23 December 2014 Food Standards Australia New Zealand PO Box ...

Report 1 Downloads 274 Views

Dec 23, 2014 - submission is from Consumer NZ, New Zealand's leading consumer ... In particular, we support a more rigorous and prescriptive approach.

23 December 2014 Food Standards Australia New Zealand PO Box 7186 Canberra BC ACT 2610 Australia By email: [email protected] SUBMISSION on Proposal P1034 – Chemical Migration from Packaging into Food 1.

Introduction

Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission on Proposal P1034 (Proposal). This submission is from Consumer NZ, New Zealand’s leading consumer organisation. It has an acknowledged and respected reputation for independence and fairness as a provider of impartial and comprehensive consumer information and advice. Contact:

2.

Sue Chetwin Consumer NZ Private Bag 6996 Wellington 6141 Phone: 04 384 7963 Email: [email protected]

Our submission

We only wish to respond to two questions in the Proposal. Question 1: What concerns, if any, do you have about food packaging in relation to food safety? FSANZ’s preliminary work on the chemical migration from packaging into food (CMPF) has confirmed that the leaching of some chemicals may pose a public health risk, although the magnitude of the risk is unknown. As the discussion document notes, other jurisdictions have responded to this risk by introducing regulations aimed at safeguarding public health. However, New Zealand has not followed. Instead, reliance has been placed on the general requirement that food packaging should be safe. Given many substances used in food packaging have not been adequately assessed, we have been concerned this stance puts consumers at risk. Of particular concern is the potential risk from cumulative exposure to packaging chemicals. We’ve previously reported on phthalates research by the US National Academy of Sciences that found widespread human exposure to these chemicals at all stages of life.1 1

National Research Council. (2008). Phthalates and Cumulative Risk Assessment, http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Phthalates-Cumulative-Risk-Assessment/12528?bname=

Certain phthalates have been restricted for use in cosmetic products in New Zealand.2 However, the approach of regulatory agencies has not been consistent and there are no similar restrictions on the use of these chemicals in other consumer products, including food packaging. The discussion document acknowledges there is evidence from recent surveys and international incidents there may be a risk from dietary exposure to CMPF “if risk management strategies are not implemented”. In our view, these strategies must ensure there is robust regulation to adequately safeguard public health. Question 2: What measures do you think could be implemented to resolve these concerns? We support the development of additional measures for managing food-safety risks arising from CMPF. In particular, we support a more rigorous and prescriptive approach to the control of chemicals that may migrate from packaging into foods, similar to the requirements in the EU and US. The fact some businesses appear to be unaware of the risks associated with CMPF is concerning. The results of FSANZ’s consultation indicate knowledge of CMPF within the business community is variable. This strongly suggests the current regulatory approach is inadequate. Given the scientific uncertainties around the safety risks from chemicals in food packaging, we believe a precautionary approach is justified. Where there is evidence of the potential for harm, then the use of that chemical should be regulated. Finally, in our view, consumers have the right to know what chemicals are contained in their food packaging. We would therefore support a requirement for food manufacturers to identify the types of food packaging they use. Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission on the Proposal. If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely

Sue Chetwin Chief Executive

2

See the Cosmetic Products Group Standard. The standard is administered by the Environmental Protection Authority and can be found at http://www.epa.govt.nz/hazardous-substances/approvals/groupstandards/Pages/cosmetic.aspx

Recommend Documents
Sep 30, 2014 - However, under the Proposal, FSSFs and EDs will not have to meet the ... composition, does not mean that they should be permitted to carry ...

This submission is from Consumer NZ, New Zealand's leading consumer organisation. It has an acknowledged and respected reputation for independence.

Catering Services, St Johns Park, Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmania; ... Queensland Health Scientific Services, Brisbane, Queensland;.

May 8, 2002 - this data demonstrates that the DHA-rich micro-algae and the oil ..... to an aerosol mist of the fermentation broth during product recovery of ...

30,000 AND MORE CAPACITY. TOPSTOPS AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND •2014. > 15,001-30,000 CAPACITY. 3. Suncorp Stadium, Milton, Australia. 52,500.

Mar 22, 2006 - CONSUMPTION FIGURES OF DAIRY PRODUCTS FOR AUSTRALIAN .... transferred to large insulated storage silos and maintained at ... From survey data on industry pasteurisation practices in Australia HTST treatment of milk ... UHT processing o

Nov 25, 2014 - Rt Honjohn Key. Prime Minister. Parliament Buildings. WELLINGTON. Dear Prime Minister lnspector-General's inquiry into NZSIS. The inspector-General of intelligence and Security (IGIS) is publishing her report into the release of inform

For many years after Tasman's explorations, New Zealand and its seemingly aggressive inhabitants lay untouched, while Australia was often only visited by accident. The true first charting of Australia and New Zealand was completed a century after Tas

Suite 801 Ma. Natividad Bldg. 470 T.M. Kalaw corner Cortada Sts., Ermita, Manila. Tel Nos: +61 3 9384 1844 Fax +61 3 9383 6226 Mob +61 411 711 639.

Oct 27, 2012 - Glenn Maxwell. 15. 0 . W. . . . . 2. 4.69. 75. Pat Cummins. 16. 5 . 4 . . . 1. 2. 4.71. 80. Glenn Maxwell. 17. 4 . . . 4 . . 2. 4.67. 84. Pat Cummins. 18. 3 . 2 . . 1 . 2. 4.58. 87. Daniel Christian. 19. 1 . . 1 W. . . 3. 4.4. 88. Jame