Email Threading Workflows

Report 5 Downloads 104 Views
BOSTON USER GROUP Workflows for Email Threading

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Jacob Cross

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Overview The objective of today’s session is to give you some ideas that will hopefully increase your knowledge of how email threading works and how to use it to your benefit during reviews.

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Agenda •

Overview of Email Threading



Loading New Email into an Existing Thread Set



Batching Options



Conflict Checks



QC with Threading



Leveraging Previously Coded Documents

• Questions

Overview of Email Threading

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Overview of Threading •

Based on Text



Combines Threads as Email Thread Groups



No Index Necessary



Identifies Inclusive Emails

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

John emails Jane.

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Jane forwards John’s email to Bob on her iPhone.

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Bob replies to Jane in Outlook.

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Step 1: Find the Segments and Headers

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Step 2: Group the Segments

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Threading ID in Relativity

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Step 3: Determine Inclusiveness Non-inclusive

Inclusive

An email whose text and attachments are fully contained in another (inclusive) email.

• An email that contains unique content not included in any other email. • Does not consider recipient information.

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Step 3: Determine Inclusiveness Determined by the following: •

Has the text changed?



Have attachments been removed?

Tends to be conservative •

When in doubt, extra inclusives are identified

Inclusive sets are not unique •

Puts the least amount of content in front of the reviewer, while still ensuring that all text variants and all attachments are seen

Considers content only •

Adding or removing recipients does not cause an inclusive flag

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

EN55

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

? EN51

EN52 EN53

????

0001+

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN62

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

Email Thread ID Break Down Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

Determine Inclusive

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN51 is Non-Inclusive Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

The Attachment Keeps EN52 Inclusive Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

We don’t have the Middle Email Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

EN55 is Non-Inclusive Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

EN62 is Non-Inclusive Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

EN00008de Control Number

Email Threading ID

EN56

EN000018de+0000+0000-0000+0000+

EN63

EN000018de+0000+0000-0001+0000+

EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

Loading New Email into an Existing Thread Set

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Incremental Build What Happens

What Does Not Happen



Inserts new emails into existing threads





Creates new threads, if there are any



Determines inclusiveness of new emails



Updates duplicate spare

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Change inclusiveness

Incremental Build Example

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Original Example EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

0000+

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

Let’s Say We Didn’t Load the Last Email or the Branch EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

EN55

EN55 Is Inclusive as It Is the Last Email in the Thread EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

????

EN55

Running an Incremental Build

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Newly Loaded Email EN61 Is the Missing Middle Email EN000018de+

0000+

0000-

0000+

? EN51

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

The Segment Is no Longer Missing EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

The Last Email in the Chain Is Added EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

But EN55 Remains an Inclusive EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

The Branch Is Added to the Chain and EN62 is Non-Inclusive EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Results of the Incremental Build EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Full Build What Happens

Trade Offs





Time for running the whole set



Will lose previous results

As if you were running it all at once

– Because you are

– Could copy into new fields

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Results of the Incremental Build EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN95

EN55

EN56

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

EN55 Would Become Non-Inclusive EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

The Branch Is Added to the Chain and EN62 is Non-Inclusive EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Final Results of Full Build EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Delta Between Incremental and Full Build on this Thread EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batching Options

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batching Options Group by email thread group •

Allows reviewers to see all the email from a conversation together



Use view to limit to inclusive

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batch by Thread EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

All 8 Documents (Don’t forget the attachment on the second email)

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batching Options Group by email thread group •

Allows reviewers to see all the email from a conversation together



Use view to limit to inclusive

Only inclusive •

Plus family?



Exclude duplicate spares?

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Inclusive Only (Include Family) EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

4 of 8 Documents (Don’t forget the attachment on the second email)

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batching Options Group by email thread group •

Allows reviewers to see all the email from a conversation together



Use view to limit to inclusive

Only inclusive •

Plus family?



Exclude duplicate spares?

Using Conceptual Clustering to Batch Inclusive Emails

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Conflict Checks

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batching Options Think family level conflict checks •

Only bigger



All inclusives matching is the most common result

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

All Inclusives Coded the Same EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN95

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN57

We’ll call green responsive. (Notice that non-inclusive emails are not coded in this example)

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batching Options Think family level conflict checks •

Only bigger



All inclusives matching is the most common result



Less likely for the coding to match than families – Review protocols often call for whole families, but not threads to be coded the same

Two common checks •

Where thread has a responsive and a privileged document



Where thread has a responsive and non-responsive document

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

All Threads That Have at Least One Responsive

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Privilege & Non-Responsive Conflict Check

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Responsive & Privilege in the Same Thread EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

We’ll call red privilege. (Notice that non-inclusive emails are not coded in this example)

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Responsive, Non-Responsive, & Privilege in the Same Thread EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

May still need to code all documents.

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Batching Options Think family level conflict checks •

Only bigger



All inclusives matching is the most common result



Less likely for the coding to match than families – Review protocols often call for whole families, but not threads to be coded the same

Two common checks •

Where thread has a responsive and a privileged document



Where thread has a responsive and non-responsive document

Good to set up at the beginning of review to keep track of review progress © kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

QC Review

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

QC Review Using Email Threading •

Including whole thread in QC checks



Sample inclusives to focus efforts



Focus on threads with multiple designations

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

QC Example EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Leveraging Previously Coded Documents

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Leveraging Previously Coded Documents •

Similar to conflict check – Two search method



Look for documents in threads that already have coding – New documents part of thread that was already coded as responsive

– Part of thread with a privileged document • Promote directly to second level?

– In thread with non-responsive • Not as high priority?

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Leverage Previous Coding

0001+

0000+

EN71

EN71

EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

All Threads That Have at Least One Privilege Document

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

New Documents That Are in a Thread With a Privilege Document

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Leverage Previous Coding

0001+

0000+

EN71

EN71

EN000018de+

0000+

0000+

0000+

0000+

EN51

EN52 EN53

EN61

EN55

EN56

0001+

0000+

EN62

EN63

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

QC Review using Email Threading •

Similar to conflict check – Two search method



Look for documents in threads that already have coding – New documents part of thread that was already coded as responsive

– Part of thread with a privileged document • Promote directly to second level?

– In thread with non-responsive • Not as high priority?

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Relativity 9.5 Email Thread Visualization

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Thread Visualization

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Email Thread Visualization

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

In Review Overview of Email Threading

Loading New Email into an Existing Thread Set Batching Options Conflict Checks

QC with Threading Leveraging Previously Coded Documents © kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Resources Training kcura.com/relativity/resources/training

Relativity Documentation help.kcura.com

Workflow Support [email protected]

Technical Support [email protected] © kCura LLC. All rights reserved.

Questions?

© kCura LLC. All rights reserved.