Session 8 - SRIVASTAVA, Anupam

Report 2 Downloads 297 Views
STC  Implementation  in  ASEAN Dr.  Anupam  Srivastava [email protected] Presentation  at  CSCAP  Meeting Bangkok,  August  8-­‐9,  2016

Functions  &  Utility  of  STC • Serve  as  a  deterrent  to  WMD   acquisition  efforts • Delay efforts  of  proliferators  in  acquiring   WMD  items  or   technologies • Help  interdict   illegal  transfers  of  controlled  goods,   materials  &  technologies • Serve  as  a  source  of  information on  possible  WMD   activities • Buy   time  for  diplomatic   efforts  to  prevent  a  WMD   program • STCs  facilitate  high-­‐technology  trade   by  creating   legal-­‐ procedural  infrastructure   – across  FTAs   and   beyond 2

UNSCR  1540:   Main  Provisions § Para  1:  general  commitment  to  not  support  non-­‐state  actors  re  WMDs § Para  2: criminalize  all  activities  of  non-­‐state  actors (unauthorized  entities)   with  regard  to  WMD-­‐relevant  items § Para  3a: appropriate  effective  measures  for  nuclear  materials  control  and   accounting § Para  3b:  appropriate  and  effective  measures  for  nuclear  material  protection   (physical  security) § Para  3c:  effective  border  controls   § Para  3d:  comprehensive  national  export  controls § Para  6: appropriate  control  lists § Para  8b:  international  obligations  incorporated  into  domestic  laws/regulations § Para  8d:  develop  appropriate  ways  to  work  with  industry  and  public § Para  9:  engage  in  dialogue  and  cooperation  on  nonproliferation § Para  10:  take  cooperative  action  to  prevent  illicit  trafficking  in  WMD  items

Translating  1540  requirements  into  STC  System

Legal Basis for STC

Interagency Licensing Process

Government Outreach to Industry

STC Enforcement

Legal  Basis  for  STC One  or  more  laws,  passed  by  the  national  legislature,  which  authorizes  the   government  to  regulate,  monitor  and  enforce  rules  and  regulations   regarding  dual-­‐use/strategic  trade. v The  law(s)  establish  the  national  reasons  for  regulating  this  trade: § Hi-­‐tech  trade  facilitation § National  security § International  nonproliferation  obligations v The  law(s)  establish   § the  scope  of  control  (which  technologies,  transactions  will  be  controlled) § the  jurisdiction  (to  whom  does  it  apply) § the  responsibilities  of  the  govt  agencies § the  responsibilities  of  the  industry  and  academia § Penalties  for  violation

STC  Licensing Official  authorization  by  the  government  for  the  transfer  of   controlled  goods  or  technologies v Licensing  system  should  be  supported  by  laws/legislation  that   provide  authority  to  designated  officials/agencies  to  license  all   activities  and  items  related  to  trade  &  transfers   of  sensitive  dual-­‐ use  goods  AND military  items v This  includes § § §

Identifying/listing  items  and  defining  transactions  that  are  subject  to   licensing  process Identifying  who  reviews  and/or  issues  export  licenses Identifying  where  end-­‐user/end-­‐use-­‐based  controls  might  apply

6

Government-­‐Industry  Outreach  in  STC What  happens  if  the  industry  violates  STC  regulations  out  of   ignorance  or  confusion?  Govt  needs  to  assist  the  industry   understand  and  comply  with  STCs v Outreach  requires  laws  &  regulations  that  designate  one  or  more   govt  agencies  with  the  responsibility  to  educate  industry   v This  includes:   § Choosing  more  than  one  method  to  communicate  with  the  industry § Assistance  in  establishing  compliance  programs § Incorporating  feedback  on  efficiency/suitability  of  STC  process  and   procedures  

7

STC  Enforcement What  happens  if  exporters  do  not  comply  with  licensing   requirements?  Enforcement  becomes  critical v Requires  laws  &  regulations  that  designate  one  or  more   govt  agencies  with  enforcement    authority  (both  dual-­‐use   &  munitions) v This  includes: § Authority  to  search,  detain,  seize,  investigate  shipments § Understand  which  items/transactions/destinations  might  require   the  exporter  to  submit  a  license   § Capacity  and  resources  (training,  procedures  &  tools)  to  identify   shipments  and  shippers  of  concern § Authority  &  protocol  to  get  inter-­‐agency  inputs § Impose  penalties  for  violations

8

Update  as  of  August  2016 1) CITS  has  converted  CSCAP  Memo  #14  into  a  Matrix and  completed  it  based  on  open  source  info  available  in  English 2)   MS-­‐CSCAP    can  now  use  their  internal  resources  to  help  CITS   update  the  Matrix  for  their  own  country 3)   Alternately,  they  can  submit  (to  Pacific  Forum  CSIS)  a  copy  of   documents  that  provide  info  corresponding  to  specific  elements   in  the  Matrix.  CITS  can  analyze  and  help  complete  the  Matrix

Legislation  covering  trade  in  dual-­‐use   (strategic)  goods

©CITS2016  Not  for   distribution  or  use  without  permission

Control  List(s)

©CITS2016  Not  for   distribution  or  use  without  permission

Empowered/Authorized  Agency   identified  for  each  function

Empowered/Authorized  Agency   identified  for  each  function

©CITS2016  Not  for   distribution  or  use  without  permission

Electronic  Tools

©CITS2016  Not  for   distribution  or  use  without  permission

Initial   Assessment v Singapore  &  Malaysia    à have  all  the  STC  elements  (as  identified  in  CSCAP   Memo#14) v Philippines  àhas  established  a  comprehensive  law  that  covers  all  the   recommended  elements  (of  STC  legal  basis)  identified  in  UNSCR  1540.  Now   embarked  upon  writing  Implementing  Rules  &  Regulations  for  each  function   v Cambodia  àlaw  covers  non-­‐devt  &  non-­‐export  of  N,  B,  C  weapons.  Needs  to   regulate  transit,  t ’shipment  &  brokering,  and  expand  scope  to  delivery  systems.   A  National  Cmte  is  working  to  pilot  IRRs  &  engage  enforcement  agencies.     v Vietnam  à regulates  nuclear  and  radiological  materials  export  &  re-­‐export.   Requires  a  law  and  IRRs  to  expand  scope  to  C,  B  and  delivery  systems v Thailand  à DoFT  working  on  STC  law;  adopted  EU  control  list  of  2009   v Other  ASEAN  countries  have  limited  or  no  clear  focus  on  CBRN  items v Other  than  SG  &  MY,  others  might  need  electronic  tools   for  licensing,   outreach  and  enforcement  activities ©CITS2016  Not  for   distribution  or  use  without  permission

Action   Items v CITS  to  send  Matrix  plus  individual  country  data-­‐sheets  to  Pacific   Forum  CSIS  to  forward  to  MS-­‐CSCAP  Secretariat  [to  get  additional   data  and  documents] v CITS  to  revise  Matrix  and  draft  Report  (with  inputs  from  CSCAP   colleagues) v Report  can  include  sections  on   § Benefits  (&  challenges)  of  establishing  common  guidelines,  lists  of  DU   items  &  entities  of  concern;  regd/approved  brokers;  freight  forwarders   § Additional  steps  to  fully  implement  &  enforce  UNSCR  1540

v Once  CSCAP  MS  approve  the  Report,  it  can  be  finalized   § Can  serve  as  a  guide  to  further  develop  national  STC  systems; should   improve  regional  coordination,  including  ASEAN  Single  Window § Copy  can  be  submitted  to  ARF; it  can  use  in  its  dialog  with  1540  Cmte    

Recommend Documents