The influence of organizational and county characteristics on local ...

Report 0 Downloads 120 Views
The influence of organizational and county characteristics on local health department revenue Susan Zahner1, DrPH, RN; Senay Goitom2, BA; Andrew Reschovsky3, PhD 1. Associate Professor, School of Nursing, UW-Madison; 2. Project Assistant-Graduate Student, Robert LaFollette School of Public Affairs, UW-Madison; 3. Professor, Robert LaFollette School of Public Affairs, UW-Madison

Background

Results

Discussion

• Local health department (LHD) funding comes from a variety of sources including local government, grants (federal, state, and private), fees for services, and charitable donations. • Economic recession is associated with declines in local government revenues and often state aid. • One strategy for addressing revenue decline from local government sources is to increase revenue from other sources. • Wide variation between LHDs in level and types of revenue from non-local government sources exists but is not well understood. • Research on patterns and influences on public health financing is lacking.

Research Questions Revenue Sources

• What LHD organizational characteristics are associated with higher levels of revenues from sources other than local government overall and by type of revenue source? • What county/jurisdictional characteristics are associated with higher levels of revenues from sources other than local government overall and by type of revenue source? • Has LHD revenue from sources other than local government, overall and by type of revenue, changed over time (2004-2008)?

population

poverty rate

Methods • Calculated per capita, inflation-adjusted, total non-local-tax revenue and total expenditure for LHD i for years 2002-2008 • Calculated per capita, inflation-adjusted revenue for LHD i for each of the following non-local government revenue sources: federal revenue; state revenue; fee for service; donations; private grants • Separately regressed each of these revenue sources on a vector of jurisdiction-wide characteristics, a vector of LHD characteristics, and a vector of time trend variables:

=

+

+

County/ Jurisdictional Characteristics

Observations

Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Private Grants

All Non Local Tax Revenue

0.0207***

-0.000718

(0.00244)

(0.00156)

-0.00472*

-0.000109

0.00154***

0.0174***

(0.00270)

(0.000533)

(0.000521)

(0.00519)

-0.139

0.247

0.00484

-0.0661**

-0.221

(0.158)

(0.0314)

(0.0306)

(0.304)

median income

-0.333***

0.0188

0.148*

-0.0207

-0.0411**

-0.193

(0.0749)

(0.0480)

(0.0829)

(0.0164)

(0.0160)

(0.159)

percent non-white

0.0741**

0.0323

-0.100**

-0.00357

0.00839

-0.00974

(0.0361)

(0.0231)

(0.0400)

(0.00789)

(0.00771)

(0.0768)

0.415*

-0.192

0.133

-0.00554

0.0211

0.454

(0.223)

(0.143)

(0.247)

(0.0491)

(0.0479)

(0.474)

0.108

0.202***

0.188

0.0173

-0.0134

0.514**

(0.111)

(0.0707)

(0.123)

(0.0243)

(0.0237)

(0.235)

percent male

county health ranking

voter turnout

Standard Deviation

Donations

(0.0914)

independent LHD

Variable

Fee for Services

(0.143)

equalized property value

Results

State Revenue

-0.364**

percent 65+ years old

+

Federal Revenue

0.0257

0.0293

-0.0659

0.000367

-0.00167

-0.00618

(0.0388)

(0.0247)

(0.0429)

(0.00895)

(0.00827)

(0.0824)

0.0170

0.235

1.267***

0.0761

0.0782

1.788**

(0.369)

(0.236)

(0.409)

(0.0807)

(0.0791)

(0.785)

0.0224

-0.0911**

0.0828

0.0417***

0.0282**

0.0718

(0.0665)

(0.0424)

(0.0736)

(0.0147)

(0.0142)

(0.141)

0.474

0.110

2.362***

-0.263***

0.171**

2.902***

(0.389)

(0.248)

(0.431)

(0.0855)

(0.0840)

(0.827)

ch140 Level 2

1.857**

0.357

0.152

0.173

0.150

2.744*

(0.731)

(0.466)

(0.808)

(0.159)

(0.156)

(1.552)

ch140 Level 3

1.885**

1.050**

2.660***

0.115

0.291*

5.755***

(0.751)

(0.479)

(0.830)

(0.163)

(0.160)

(1.594)

-0.0481

1.367**

4.379***

-0.213

0.565***

6.816***

(0.872)

(0.557)

(0.964)

(0.190)

(0.186)

(1.851)

-1.212

0.945**

1.544*

0.0313

-0.0969

1.464

(0.752)

(0.479)

(0.832)

(0.165)

(0.161)

(1.597)

-1.408*

0.328

1.653**

-0.0635

-0.156

0.546

(0.723)

(0.462)

(0.799)

(0.158)

(0.155)

(1.535)

1.726**

1.725***

3.533***

0.355**

0.220

7.674***

(0.745)

(0.476)

(0.824)

(0.163)

(0.159)

(1.582)

0

0

0

0

0

0

(0)

(0)

(0)

(0)

(0)

(0)

County/jurisdictional characteristics associated with higher per capita non-local government revenues included: • Larger population (Overall, federal, fees, & private grants) • Lower poverty rates (Federal & private grants) • Median income (Fees) • Better county health ranking (Overall & fees) • Voter turnout (Donations & private grants) County/jurisdictional characteristics associated with lower non-local government revenues included: • Median income (Federal & private grants) • Voter turnout (State grants) LHD characteristics associated with higher non-local government revenues included: • Independent health department compared to human service model (Overall, fees, & private grants) • More complex service mix/higher certification level (Overall, federal state, fees, & private grants) • Region of state (compared to SE) • North (overall, state grants, fees, & private grants) • South (state grants & fees) • Northeast (fees) • West (overall, federal, state, fees, and donations) LHD characteristics associated with lower non-local government revenues included: • Independent health department compared to human service model (Donations) • Region of state (compared to SE) • Northeast (federal grants) Time trend: Compared to 2004, 2006-2008 indicated more federal grant revenue (likely related to H1N1 response and an increase in WIC funding) and more private grant revenues. Overall per capita non-local government revenue did not change significantly over this time period.

Limitations • Aggregate county-level measures may mask important variations among sub-county (city/town) LHD jurisdictions • Analysis is descriptive only and limited to 5 years of data (2004-2008)

Conclusions

Dependent Variables Federal Revenue

652

5.64

4.38

0

45.82

State Revenue

651

2.10

2.53

0.00

18.72

Fee for Services

653

5.12

5.38

0.00

74.91

Donations

645

0.14

0.86

0.00

14.49

Private Grants

645

0.29

0.72

0.00

8.99

Total Non-Local-Tax Revenue

653

13.38

9.43

0.00

90.78

4.59

595.958

northern region Local Health Department Characteristics southern region

northeastern region

Jurisdiction/County Characteristics western region

population (in 1000s)

653

59.61

80.57

poverty rate

686

10.87

4.10

3.40

34.10

median income (in $1,000s)

686

45.25

7.72

28.01

75.94

percent non-white

686

9.75

12.60

0.95

85.71

percent male

686

49.80

1.05

48.05

53.91

percent 65+ years old

686

14.48

3.29

9.16

25.59

equalized property value (in $10,000s)

641

8.85

4.93

3.55

70.23

county health ranking

490

0.127

0.857

-1.730

3.000

voter turnout

686

62.35

4.49

49.33

77.00

Local Health Department Characteristics local health department type

686

0.76

0.43

0

1

Level 2

686

0.531

0.499

0

1

Level3

686

0.357

0.480

0

1

Northern Region

686

0.153

0.360

0

1

Southern Region

686

0.224

0.418

0

1

Northeastern Region

686

0.204

0.403

0

1

Southeastern Region

686

0.235

0.424

0

1

Western Region

686

0.184

0.388

0

1

2004b.year

2005.year

2006.year Time Trend

-0.318

-0.0196

0.492

-0.0300

0.0211

0.734

(0.515)

(0.328)

(0.568)

(0.113)

(0.111)

(1.091)

1.029*

-0.424

0.272

-0.0279

0.249**

0.972

(0.531)

(0.339)

(0.588)

(0.116)

(0.114)

(1.128)

2007.year

1.097*

-0.288

0.0242

0.0367

0.441***

1.168

(0.581)

(0.371)

(0.643)

(0.127)

(0.124)

(1.235)

2008.year

1.389**

-0.398

-0.294

0.0734

0.347**

0.873

(0.641)

(0.409)

(0.709)

(0.140)

(0.137)

(1.361)

-2.850

13.27

-22.38

-1.483

-0.419

-20.18

(13.24)

(8.442)

(14.65)

(2.925)

(2.836)

(28.12)

Chapter 140 (Base level=1)

Constant

Observations R-squared

453

453

454

448

449

454

0.331

0.201

0.311

0.122

0.214

0.364

Standard errors in parentheses

*** p