-----.---.----.---.-.--.----------.---...-.-.--.-.----.---.---.------.--.----.-----.-----.--..-----.---.-._.~_ .._---_._---_._-----------------_._-._._._-_._---.-.-.-.------.--------.-..-.----.---------.----------.--.---.-------.---------.-----.------.------.---------.--.---.---.---.------.--.--.---
..
BBS: Date:
Tt18
From: To: Subj:
DOLORES RUTHERFORD ROBERT THOMAS STRONG WILLIAMS - VA
BC
Bar1dM2steY~ Vancc£llv2r, (:20:26)
f\jufnb (:?r' Refer#: Recvd:
04--:24-'-95
-------------------_._-----------------------~_._--_ E·:()b
:
NONE NO
-----------.-
-----.------.---
------.--------.---------.----.-
'J
Saw your message to TR Peterson and want to comment on what I recently wrote to you about your Eleazer WILLIAMS. I formerly - thouqht that there ... was no chance that Eleazer could be a son of my William WILLIAMS? but found Eleazer er1umerated RI(~HT NEX'l- DOOR to Mary NIL.I__IAMS in (:II'le of thcrse tax lists~ I still think that Eleazer is more of the generation of my Zachariah. looks as if we are right ba(:k where we started fY()fnu I didr1't fir1ci listed in any of those tax lists WITH any other WILLIAMS. In the 1755 tax list, an Elias WILLIAMS is listed with my William but he MAY be the same Elias WILLIAMS as was listed in 1752 under Croudus (Crowdas). That Elias was not in the 1753 or 1754 lists, lists are missing those years. In 1756 and 1757, Elias is listed there are no lists extant for 1758. In 1759 and 1760, Azariah is the overseer for and under John Britt?s name. The 1761 WILLIAMS incomplete
list does not listed alone. and show no
Elia~;
WIL_.LIAMS
these
fiyst
177~:;
"
of the Eleazer
Elias
&
"
" " "
.J_
oT
"
-
wits. wits. wits.
t:.~
]~~.}
f
I. .•
_ ..
to to to F' 'f"
II
.~).
n c
t:()
'\:Jit~:.=
deed deed deed t7.' ~::.
~...
c3f:?:?d
11
L.. f:? -:'~
k
to
Id
€?
£-:1
ci
t: ()
L"'·?'::;'.k
E{'f-
"
·::E';:· ~:. "
Fj'r' ub b " c:'~d d L~~;:.II
()
t:()
"I)\~\/i·~:.
...-
()f
follo';.JinfJ
G1
f
an
nc)t
bllt
1..·111:::.'
mka)
(signed) ( )"
"
("
-rhU.·f-·~.:.t()n'l
&
Inv= of est~ of EleazeF Williams retlJyned anej rec:c)rc~ecj in 1·7:::3 .. :3 !;!.!:.;t ct. t) en n
.....
gave security for Elias. ~:': Co • .:;~\;;-;:::-t .. FJ.:i.':-~~:. {;..J:i.ll:i."",-ms". ,.,"In DE:~bt" -...hlrn .. I···!,,~x)'·:i.·:".on
se(:l_tYity
Williams
L.:..'=-..:"-- •../~ •••.__
&
nm.)
l)Erf:)tiJ
:'.{
~J..~......!""~:.._l:..··_-._~ ••
for
as
a
Eliasq witsu
~)yc!ves a deed
fYCim
Moss
to
G~l.tt1h~
l l ./ j ~"~-"
Eleaze~
Williams BYoa(jdlJS~
as
grantC)F
I'~is wfu
i__ s Williams
Frar1ces
de(:la~es
ac~~rlc,wledges a deed to yelu tler d()wer rtsu
Shippley
the
ifl
laj'l(j;
ir1'~estate and she is issued LOA in the estate with Richard Johnson, Wm. Nuckoles and Elias Williams as her securities. Wm. Massie, Thos. Massie, John Holland and Nathaniel Holland (or any three
F'ranc: __
of
tt')em) were
appc)inted
Do you
II
F"Yances
Williams
ttlat
suppose
S;W22YS
she
to
Azarills
the
apf3raise
Frances was
Williams
was
estate;
a MASSIE
assess;ed
died
with
6
or a HOLLAND?) hClyses
she possessed in April of 1782. collect a tax on said horses. -- \James Mei',ies(?) agstu Drury Alford & Frances Williams, d£2C'd ",n "In DE,bt ". Pl t. a',,.\!c\i'"dE'C! Eleazor Williams, (:o~~tSq - A case involving Elias Wills (could this be Williams?) agst. \;,Jin. ~'Jilli,':\fn':::, n'" "In C"' •':5''.0''. . John Lovi!211 E\ct