1 Part 1: An Introduction: Organizational Behaviour and Management ...

Report 5 Downloads 25 Views
1

Part  1:  An  Introduction:  Organizational  Behaviour  and  Management Sodexo  Canada -­  leading  provider  of  food  services  and  facilities  management -­  offers  integrated  facilities  management  services  i.e.  building  maintenance,  construction, landscaping,  security,  concierge  services,  housekeeping,  fitness  centre  management -­  Better  Tomorrow  Plan:  global  initiative  that  was  developed  at  the  company’s  headquarters -­  global  and  local  issues  that  touch  every  part  of  the  organization -­  three  main  pillars  :  actively  promote  nutrition,  health,  and  wellness;;  support  development of  communities;;  protect  the  environment -­  plan:  company  wide  commitments  to  reduce  its  carbon  footprint,  water  consumption,  waste diversion  and  composting -­  online  toolkit  to  communicate  to  and  engage  employees -­  Green  Team:    educate  and  engage  employees  +  inspire  them  to  adapt  practises  and  reduce waste -­  quarterly  newsletters -­  Chris  Roberts:  Director  of  Corporate  Citizenship -­  decentralized  employment  population  is  tough -­  used  cross  functional  teams  to  help  with  initiatives -­  company  works  with  World  Wildlife  Fund -­  national  sustainable  seafood  policy -­  supports  ongoing  employee  education -­  tuition  subsidies,  training  programs  etc. What  are  organizations? Organizations:  Social  inventions  for  accomplishing  common  goals  through  group  effort -­i.e.  Sodexo,  CTV,  Toronto  Blue  Jays Social  Inventions -­  that  their  essential  characteristic  is  the  coordinated  presence  of  people.  not  things -­  people  who  present  both  opportunities  and  challenges  -­the  field  of  organizational  behaviour:  understanding  people  and  managing  them  to  work effectively Goal  Accomplishment -­  non-­profit  organizations:  soul  saving,  promoting  arts,  education  etc. -­  every  organization  has  survival  as  a  goal -­  field  of  organizational  behaviour  is  concerned  with  how  organizations  can  survive  and adapt  to  change -­  Behaviours  that  are  necessary  for  survival  and  adaptation: -­  be  motivated  to  join  and  remain  within  the  organization -­  carry  out  their  basic  work  reliably,  in  terms  of  productively,  quality,  and  service -­  be  willing  to  continuously  learn  and  upgrade  their  knowledge  and  skills -­  be  flexible  and  innovative  (especially  important  for  contemporary  organizations  since they  provide  adaption  to  change) Group  Effort

2

-­  interaction  and  organization  among  people  to  accomplish  orgs.  goals -­  much  of  intellectual  and  physical  work  done  in  organizations  is  literally  provided  by  groups -­  informal  grouping:  friends  and  alliances  develop  to  finish  work -­  informal  contact:  can  have  strong  impact  on  goal  achievement -­  field  of  organizational  behaviour  is  concerned  with  how  to  get  people  to  practise  effective teamwork What  is  organizational  Behaviour? Organizational  Behaviour:  attitudes  and  behaviours  of  individuals  and  groups  in  organizations -­  systematically  studies  these  attitudes  and  behaviours  and  provides  insight  about  effectively managing/changing  them -­  studies  how  organization  can  be  structured  more  effectively -­  studies  how  events  in  their  external  environment  affect  organizations -­  those  who  study  OB: -­  interested  in  attitudes:  how  satisfied  people  are,  committed  they  feel,  supportive  they  are  towards promoting  women/minorities  into  management  positions Human  Resource  Management  :  refers  to  programs,  practises,and  systems  to  acquire,  develop  and retain  employees  in  organizations -­  recruitment  and  selection,  compensation,  training  and  development -­  knowledge  of  OB  helps  understand  effectiveness  of  HRM -­  role  of  perception,  employee  absenteeism  and  turnover  (necessary  for  developing  effective  HR practices) -­  theories  of  motivation:  understand  employee  motivation  and  performance -­  HR  practises  ;;  contribute  to  socialization  process  in  organization Why  Study  OB? It’s  Interesting -­  about  human  nature  and  people -­  includes  interesting  example  sofa  success  and  failure It’s  Important -­  impact  of  OB  is  important  -­  does  not  stop  at  the  walls  of  any  organization -­  consumers  are  also  affected -­  tremendous  variation  in  OB It  Makes  a  Difference -­  organizations  can  no  longer  achieve  a  competitive  advantage  through  the  traditional  sources  of success  i.e.  technology,  regulated  markets,  financial  resources  etc. -­  main  factor  that  differentiates  organizations  is  their  workforce  and  human  capital -­  human  capital  is  strongly  related  and  a  key  determinant  of  firm  performance -­  sustained  competitive  advantage  therefore,  and  organizational  effectiveness  are  related  to  the management  of  human  capital  and  OB -­  Pfeffer:  16  practices  i.e.  incentive  pay,  participation  and  empowerment,  teams,  job  redesign, training  and  skill  development How  much  do  you  know  about  Organizational  Behaviour?

3

-­  research:  each  of  the  statements  is  actually  false  (pg  8  of  textbook) -­  researchers  have  found  that  the  personalities  of  effective  leaders  vary  a  fair  amount,  many  superiors, workers  underestimate  their  own  absenteeism  and  pay  is  not  always  the  most  effective  way  to  motivate workers  and  improve  job  performance -­  experience  indicates  that  people  are  good  at  giving  sensible  reasons  why  the  same  statement  is  either true  or  false  -­  thus,  pay  will  always  motivate  workers  because  most  people  want  to  make  more  money  and  will work  harder  to  get  more  pay -­ Research  Focus:  Are  the  best  Companies  to  work  for  the  best  companies? -­  additional  costs  associated  with  being  a  great  place  to  work  justified  by  higher  firm performance? -­  Ingrid,  fulmer  Barry  Gerhart,  Kimberly  Scott:  Study -­  compared  50  Fortune  100  best  list  -­-­>  comparable  in  terms  of  industry  size  and  operating performance -­  comparisons  indicated  100  best  companies  outperformed  the  matched  groups  of companies  on  financial  performance  and  stock  returns -­  Financial  performance:  measures  by  return  on  assets  (ROA)and  market  to  book  value  of  equity was  generally  better  among  100  best  than  matched  group -­    cumulative  stock  returns  of  the  companies    the  100  best  list  outperformed  a  composite  market index  by  183  percentage  points,  or  95% -­  companies  in  the  100  best  list  has  more  positive  employee  relations  and  attitudes  compared  to  the other  companies -­  to  assess  stability  of  employee  attitude -­  2  years:  the  relationship  was  positive  and  significant  and  there  was  little  change  from one  year  to  next -­  employee  attitudes  were  highly  positive  at  best  100  and  stable  -­-­>  provided  support  for  the  belief that  positive  employee  relations  are  a  source  of  sustainable  competitive  advantage -­  therefore,  direct  positive  link  between  employee  relations  and  attitudes  and  financial performance -­  companies  can  create  attractive  workplaces  without  hurting  bottom  line Goals  of  OB -­  predicting,  explaining  and  managing  behaviour Predicting  OB -­  anticipate  when  people  will  get  angry -­  interest  in  predicting  when  people  will  make  ethical  decisions,  create  innovative  products  or engage  in  sexual  harassment -­  the  regularity  of  it,  permits  the  predictions  of  its  future  occurrence -­  untutored  predictions  of  OB  are  not  always  accurate -­  field  of  OBB  provides  scientific  foundation  that  helps  improve  predictions  of  organizational events

4

-­  being  able  to  predict  OB  does  not  guarantee  that  we  can  explain  the  reason  for  the  behaviour and  develop  an  effective  strategy  to  manage  it Explaining  OB -­  prediction  and  explanation  are  not  synonymous -­  accurate  predictions  precedes  explanations -­  determining  why  people  are  more  or  less  motivated,  satisfied,  or  prone  to  resign -­  explaining  events  is  more  complicated  than  predicting -­  case  can  have  multiple  causes -­  underlying  causes  of  some  event/behaviour  can  change  over  time Managing  OB -­  Management:  the  art  of  getting  things  accomplished  through  others -­  acquire,  allocate  and  utilize  physical  and  HR  to  accomplish  goals -­  prediction  and  explanation  =  analysis,  management=  action -­  we  see  cases  where  managers  act  without  analysis:  i.e.  quick  fix  result=  disaster -­  do  not  overanalyze:  rather  approach  the  problem  with  a  systematic  understanding  of  behavioural science  and  OB  +use  that  understanding  to  make  decisions:  evidence-­based  management -­  evidence-­based  management:  involves  translating  principles  based  on  the  best  scientific evidence  into  organizational  practices -­  managers  can  make  decisions  based  on  best  available  scientific  evidence  from  social science  and  organizational  research -­  voids  personal  preference  and  unsystematic  experience -­  derives  principles  from  research  evidence  and  makes  practises  that  solve  problems -­  more  likely  to  result  in  attainment  of  Organizational  goals,  also  those  affecting employees,  stockholders,  and  public  in  gener;; Early  Prescriptions  Concerning  Management -­  ongoing  concern:  prescribing  the  ‘correct’  way  to  manage  an  organization  to  reach  its  goals -­  history  of  management  thought  and  Ob  has  developed The  Classical  view  and  Bureaucracy -­  early  1900s -­  military  settings,  mining  operations,  factories  that  produces  everything -­  Henri  Fayol -­  James  D.  Mooney:  GM  executive -­  Lyndall  Urwick:  consultant -­  Classical  viewpoint:  tended  to  advocate  a  very  high  degree  of  specialization  of  labour  and  a very  high  degree  of  coordination -­  each  department:  tend  to  own  affairs,  centralized  decision  making  from  upper  management -­  suggests  that  managers  have  fairly  few  workers  except  for  low  level  jobs  where  machine  pacing will  substitute  for  close  supervision -­  Fredrick  Taylor  :  father  of  scientific  management  :  system  for  using  research  to  determine  the optimum  degree  of  specialization  and  standardization  of  work  tasks

5

-­  mainly  concerned  with  job  design  and  structure  of  work  on  the  shop  floor -­  supported  development  of  written  instructions-­-­>  clearly  defining  work  procedures, encouraged  supervisors  to  standardize  workers  movements  and  breaks  for  maximum efficiency -­  extended  scientific  management  to  the  supervisor;;s  job:  functional  foremanship  )where supervisors  would  specialize  in  particular  functions) -­  Max  Weber -­  German  social  theorist -­  made  the  term  bureaucracy:  ideal  type  of  organization  (Weber)  that  included  a  strict chain  of  command,  detailed  rules,  high  specialization,  centralized  power,  and  selection  and  promotion  based on  technical  competence -­  advocating  it  as  a  means  of  rationally  managing  complex  organizations -­  time  of  industrial  growth;;  most  management  was  done  by  intuition,  nepotism  and favouritism  were  rampant -­  following  qualities  of  bureaucracy  (Weber) -­  strict  chain  of  command  in  which  each  member  reports  to  only  a  single  supervisor -­  criteria  for  selection  and  promotion  based  on  impersonal  technical  skills  rather  than nepotism  favouritism -­  a  set  of  detailed  rules,  regulations  and  procedures  ensuring  that  the  job  gets  done regardless  of  who  the  specific  worker  is -­  the  use  of  strict  specialization  to  match  duties  with  technical  competence -­  the  centralization  of  power  at  the  top  of  the  organization -­  weber  saw  it  as  an  ideal  type,  or  theoretical  model  -­-­>  would  standardize  behaviour  and provide  workers  with  security+  sense  of  purpose -­  jobs  would  be  performanced  as  intended,  not  whims  of  specific  role  occupant -­  workers  would  have  a  fair  chance  at  promotion  and  rising  in  the  power  structure -­  provide  security  to  workers:  rules,  clear  cut  command  chain  etc. -­  Mary  Parker:  classical  view  of  management  seemed  to  take  for  granted  essential conflict  of  interest  between  managers  and  employees The  Human  Relations  Movement  and  a  Critique  of  Bureaucracy -­  began  with  famous  Hawthorne  studies  :  research  conducted  at  the  Hawthorne  plant  of Western  Electric  near  Chicago  in  the  1920s  that  illustrated  how  psychological  and  social  processes  affect productivity  and  work  adjustment -­  1920s  and  30s -­  began  in  the  strict  tradition  of  industrial  engineering -­  concerned  with  impact  of  fatigue,  rest  pauses,    lighting  on  productivity -­  researchers  began  to  notice  the  effect  of  psychological  and  social  processes  on  productivity  and work  adjustment  -­-­>  could  be  dysfunctional  aspects  to  how  work  was  organized -­  one  sign:  resistance  to  management  through  strong  informal  group  mechanisms,  i.e.  norms  that limited  productivity  to  less  that  management  wanted -­  after  WWII -­  human  relations  movement:  critique  of  classical  management  and  bureaucracy  that

6

advocated  management  styles  that  were  more  participative  and  oriented  toward  employee  needs -­  called  attention  to  dysfunctional  aspects  of  classical  management -­  advocated  people-­orientated  style  of  management  catering  to  social  and  psychological needs  of  employees -­  critique  addressed  several  specific  problems: -­  strict  specialization  is  incompatible  with  human  needs  for  growth  and  achievement.  This can  lead  to  employee  alienation  from  the  organization  and  its  clients -­  strong  centralization  and  reliance  on  formal  authority  often  fail  to  take  advantage  of  the creative  ideas  and  knowledge  of  lower-­level  members,  who  are  often  closer  to  the  customer -­  as  a  result;;  the  org.  will  fail  to  learn  from  mistakes,  threatening  innovation  and adaption -­  strict,  impersonal  rules  lead  members  to  adopt  the  minimum  a  higher  performance  levels are  possible -­  strong  specialization  causes  employees  to  lose  sight  of  the  overall  goals  of  the  org.  Forms procedures,  required  signatures  become  ends  in  themselves.  divorced  rom  needs  of  customers,  clients,  and departments  in  org.  -­-­>  called  the  red-­tape  mentality -­  not  all  orbs.  have  these  problems-­-­>  common Contemporary  Management  :  The  contingency  approach How  the  apparent  tension  between  the  classical  approach  and  human  relations  approach  has  been resolved: -­  classical  advocates:  critical  role  of  control  and  coordination  in  getting  goals  accomplished -­  human  relationists:  dangers  of  forms  of  control  and  coordination  (plus  addressed  needs  for flexibility  and  adaptability) -­  contemporary  scholars:  management  approached  need  to  be  tailored  to  fit  the  situation -­  i.e.  manage  a  payroll  department  more  bureaucratically  than  research  and  development department  -­-­>  payroll  once  a  week  is  no  margin  for  error -­  research  requires  creativity  that  is  fostered  by  a  more  flexible  work  environment -­  OB  cannot  be  a  cookbook -­  there  is  a  growing  body  of  research  and  management  experience  to  help  sort  out  complexities  of what  happens -­  everything  relies  on  :  it  depends  :  dependencies  are  called  contingencies -­  contingency  approach:  approach  to  management  that  recognized  that  there  is  no  one  best  way to  manage,  and  that  an  appropriate  management  style  depends  on  the  demands  of  the  situation -­  the  effectiveness  of  a  leadership  style  is  contingent  on  the  abilities  of  the  followers,  i.e. consequence  of  a  pay  increase  is  contingent  on  need  for  money -­  contingencies  :  illustrate  complexities  of  OB  and  why  we  need  to  study  it  systematically What  do  managers  do? -­  strong  impact  on  what  happens  in  and  to  orgs. -­  influence  and  are  influenced  by  OB  -­-­>  net  result  can  have  a  huge  effect  for  organizational  effectiveness Managerial  roles -­  Henry  Mintzberg

7

-­  canadian  management  theorist -­  conducted  study  of  behaviour  of  several  managers -­  complex  set  of  roles  played  by  the  managers:  figurehead,  leader,  liaison  person,  monitor, disseminator,  spokesperson,  entrepreneur,  disturbance  handler,  resource  allocator,  negotiator -­  Informational  Roles:  Monitor,  disseminator,  spokesperson -­  interpersonal  roles:  figurehead,  leader,  liaison -­  decisional  roles:  entrepreneur,  disturbance  handler,  resource  all Interpersonal  Roles: -­  expected  behaviours  that  have  to  do  with  establishing  and  maintaining  interpersonal  relations -­  figurehead  role:  managers  service  symbols  of  their  organization  rather  than  active  decision makers -­  i.e.  making  a  speech  to  a  trade  group,  entertaining  clients,  signing  documents. -­  Liaison  role:  managers  maintain  horizontal  contacts  inside  and  outside  the  organization -­  i.e.  discussing  project  with  colleague  in  another  department,  delegate  in  another  country -­  Monitor  role:  managers  scan  internal/external  environments  of  the  firm  to  follow  performance and  keep  themselves  informed -­  attend  professional  engineering  conference  (head) -­  disseminator  role:  managers  send  out  information  on  both  facts  and  preferences  to  others -­  i.e.  R&D  summarized  what  he/she  learnt  at  conferences -­  spokesperson  role:  mainly  sending  message  into  organization’s  external  environment  i.e.  drafting annual  report  to  stockholders Decisional  Roles -­  entrepreneur  role;;  managers  turn  problems  and  opps.  into  plans  for  improved  changes i.e.  suggesting  new  product  or  service  that  will  please  customers -­  disturbance  handler:  managers  deal  with  problems -­  resource  allocator:  decide  how  to  deploy  time,  money,  personnel,  other  critical  resources -­  negotiator  role:  conduct  major  negotiations  with  other  orgs.  or  individuals -­  relative  importance  of  roles  vary  with  management  level  and  organizational  technology -­  first  level  supervisors  do  more  disturbance  handling  and  less  figure  heading -­  Mintzberg  main  contribution  to  OB:  highlight  complexity  of  roles  managers  are  required  to  play  and variety  of  skills  they  must  have  to  be  effective  ,  i.e.leadership,  communication  and  negotiation -­  also  illustrates  the  complex  balancing  pact  managers  fav  when  they  must  play  different  roles  for different  audiences Managerial  Activities -­  Fred  Luthans,  Richard  Hodgetts,  Stuart  Rosenkrantz  -­-­>  study -­  behaviour  of  a  large  number  of  managers  in  a  variety  of  different  kinds  of  orgs. -­  managers  will  engage  in  four  types  of  activities: 1.  Routine  communication:  includes  formal  sending  receiving  of  information  (i.e.  meetings) and  handling  of  paperwork 2.  traditional  management:  planning,  decision  making,  controlling  are  primary 3.  networking:  interacting  with  people  outside  the  org.  and  informal  socializing  and

8

politicking  with  insiders 4.  Human  resource  management:  includes  motivating  and  reinforcing,  disciplining  and punishing,  managing  conflict,  staffing,  training  +  development -­  sample  of  248  managers  -­-­>  page  17  results -­  fascinating  finding:  ho  emphasis  on  these  various  activities  correlated  with  managerial  success -­  if  we  define  cusses  as  moving  up  the  rank  of  an  org.  quickly,  networking  was  critical  (less  to HRM) -­  success  in  terms  of  unit  effectiveness  and  employee  satisfaction  and  commitment:  more successful  managers  were  those  who  devoted  more  time  to  effort  and  HRM  (less  to  networking) Managerial  Agendas -­  John  Kotter:  behaviour  patterns  of  number  of  general  managers -­  found  differences  but  also  a  lot  of  similarities -­  categories:  agenda  setting,  networking,  agenda  implementation Agenda  Setting -­  managers  all  gradually  developed  agendas  of  their  accomplishment  for  orgs. -­  almost  always  informal  and  unwritten,  they  were  much  more  concerned  with  people  issues  and less  numerical  than  most  formal  strategic  plans -­  based  agendas  wide-­ranging  informal  discussions  with  wide  variety  of  people Networking -­  wide  formal  and  informal  network  of  key  people -­  insiders:  peers,  employees,  bosses,  people’s  employees,  bosses -­  outsiders:  customers,  suppliers,  competitors.  government  officials,  press -­  provided  information  and  established  cooperative  relationships  relevant  to  their  agendas -­  formal  hiring,  reassigning  shaped  the  network -­  formal  liaisons  in  which  managers  created  dependencies  by  doing  favours  for  others  (also shaped  network) Agenda  implementation -­  used  networks  to  implement -­  would  go  anywhere  for  help -­  employed  wide  range  of  influence  tactics,  from  direct  orders  to  subtle  language  and  stories  that conveyed  their  message  indirectly -­  findings -­  high  degree  of  informal  interaction/  concern  with  people  issues  that  were  necessary  for  the managers  to  achieve  their  agendas -­  managers  used  formal  org.  power,  but  often  found  themselves  dependent  on  people  who  wielded no  power Managerial  Minds -­  Herbert  Simon  and  Daniel  Isenberg -­  explored  how  managers  think -­  managerial  intuition  (focus) -­  intuition  has  guided  many  actions,  and  they  use  intuition  in  these  several  ways:

9

-­  to  sense  that  a  problem  exists -­  to  perform  well  learned  mental  tasks  rapidly  (i.e.  sizing  up  written  contracts) -­  to  synthesize  isolated  pieces  of  information  and  date -­  to  double  check  more  formal  or  mechanical  analyses  (do  these  projections  look correct?) -­  dispute  the  idea  that  intuition  is  the  opposite  of  rationality  or  that  it  means  unanalytical -­  good  intuition:  problem  solving  or  problem  identification  based  on  long  history  of systematic  and  extensive  education/experience  that  enables  a  manager  to  locate  problems  within  network of  previously  acquired  information International  Managers -­  basic  behaviours  and  thought  processes;;  international  managers  would  act  the  same  generally -­  cross  cultural  variations  in  values  that  affect  interpersonal  interactions Geert  Hofstede -­  managers  are  cultural  heroes  and  a  distinct  social  class  in  NA -­  Germany;;  worships  engineers  and  have  fewer  managerial  types -­  Japan:  managers  pay  obsessive  attention  to  group  solidarity  rather  than  to  star  employees -­  Netherlands  :exhibit  modesty  and  strive  for  congress -­  Taiwan/Singapore:  family  run  businesses  professional  management  (such  as  NA)  is  downplayed -­  technically  requirements  for  achieving  success  is  the  same  but  the  behavioural  requirements  are different -­  national  culture  is  one  of  the  most  important  contingency  variables  in  OB -­  What  depends  on  where  one  is  in  the  world? -­  appropriateness  of  various  leadership  styles -­  motivational  techniques -­  communication  methods Some  Contemporary  Management  Concerns -­  four  issues  with  which  organizations  and  managers  are  currently  concerns Diversity  (Local  and  Global) -­  demographics  of  NA  changing -­  workforce  and  customers  becoming  diverse -­  contributions:  increased  immigration  and  women  into  paid  employment -­  visible  minorities:  fastest  growing  segment  of  the  population -­  2/3  of  todays  new  entrants  into  labour  force:  women,  visible  minorities,  aboriginals  and persons  with  disabilities -­  Statistics  Canada:  number  of  visible  minorities  s  to  double  by  2017 -­  will  form  more  than  half  the  population  in  greater  Toronto  and  Vancouver -­  immigrants  will  account  for  22  %  of  population -­  diversity  of  age -­  workforce  will  be  dominated  with  people  over  40  in  the  next  10  years  or  less -­  2015  projectos:  48%  of  canada's  working  age  population  will  be  between  ages  45-­64 (this  was  29%  in  1991)

10

-­  growing  #  of  65+  year  olds  will  be  in  workforce  because a)  elimination  of  mandatory  retirement  age  of  65 b)  recent  global  recession  where  people’s  life  savings  diminished -­  75%  expected  to  work  past  65 -­  factors  included  in  the  much  more  intergenerational  contact  in  workplace: a)  re  entry  of  retired  people  into  the  workforce b_  trend  to  remove  vertical  layers  in  the  organization -­  new  programs  in  response  to  demographic  shift: -­  flexible  benefit  plan -­  compressed  work  days -­  part  time  jobs -­  attract/  retain  older  workers -­  Orkin/PCO  Services  Corp.  -­-­>pest  control  service  -­-­>  dealt  with  shortage  of  pest  control specialists-­-­>  introduced  more  flexible  part  time  schedule  with  benefits  to  attract  employees  back  or  to stay -­  diversity  issues  have  increasing  impact  as  organizations  go  global -­  foreign  sales  by  MNCs  exceed  7  trillion  and  growing  20/30%  faster  than  sales  of exports -­  multinational  expansion,  strategic  alliances,  joint  ventures  -­-­>  require  employees  and managers  to  come  to  contact  with  counterparts  from  other  cultures -­  diversity  and  OB -­  stereotypes,  conflict,  cooperation  and  teamwork -­  managers  must  manage  these  effectively  for  orgs.  to  benefit  from  the  considerable opportunities  that  diverse  workforce  offers A  Positive  Work  Environment  and  Employee  Well  Being -­  deterioration  of  well  being:  concern  over  job  security,  job  demands,  work  related  stress -­  employees  who  are  disengaged,  disillusioned,  suffering  from  physical  and  mental  sickness -­  absenteeism  +employee  turnover  on  the  rise  in  Cda -­  Statistics  Canada:  increase  if  found  across  all  age  groups  and  sectors,  translates  into  millions  of dollars  in  lost  productivity -­  total  cost  reported  absenteeism  is  15  billion  annually -­  major  contributors:  poorly  designed  jobs  +  increasing  stress  levels -­  work  related  illness  on  the  rise -­  more  workplace  stress  than  a  decade  ago -­  Canadian  employees  study  ;;  direct  cost  of  absenteeism  is  high  work  life  conflict:  3-­5  billion dollars  annually -­  costs  Canadians  approx.  6-­10  billion  per  year  (when  both  direct  and  indirect  costs  included) -­  employees  searching  for  meaning  and  purposes  in  their  work  lives  have  focused  on  employee physical  and  mental  health  by  creating  positive  work  environments -­  OB  concerned  with  creating  positive  work  environments  that  contribute  to  employee health/wellness -­  spiritual  workplace  and  workplace  spirituality:  workplace  that  provides  employees  with

11

meaning  purpose  a  sense  of  community  and  a  connection  to  others -­  is  not  about  religion,  but  provides  employees  with  meaningful  work  life  aligned  with  their values -­  employees  have  interesting  work  which  provides  them  meaning  and  feeling  of  purpose,  a sense  they  belong  to  the  org.  and  a  sense  of  connection  to  their  work  +others -­  have  opportunities  for  personal  growth  and  development -­  feel  valued/supported e.g.  Telus:  provides  quiet  rooms  for  meditation,  praying,  decompassing  etc. -­  they  offer  seminars  -­  nutrition,  parenting,  work  life  balance  etc. -­  spirituality  initiatives  :  create  positive  work  environment,  promotes  health  and wellness  +  reduced  absenteeism -­  OB  :  concerned  with  developing  employees  and  providing  them  with  resources  they  need  to achieve  goals -­  psychological  capital:  an  individual’s  positive  psychological  state  of  development  that  is characterized  by;;  (components  of  PsyCap) -­  self  efficacy  (one's  confidence  to  take  on  and  put  on  the  necessary  effort  to  succeed  at challenging  tasks)  , -­  optimism  (making  internal  attributions  about  positive  events  in  present  and  future +external  attributions  about  negative  events)  , -­  hope  (persevering  towards  one's  goals  and  when  necessary  making  changes  and  using multiple  pathways  to  achieve  ones  goals), -­  resilience  (ones  ability  to  bounce  back  or  rebound  from  adversity  and  setbacks  to  attain success) -­  these  components  are  considered  to  be  states  or  positive  work  related  psychological  resources -­-­>  they  can  be  changed  modified  and  developed -­  they  are  not  fixed  stable  or  static  personality  traits -­  research  on  Psycap:  positively  related  to  employee  psychological  well  being  and  positive  job attitudes,  behaviours,  performance -­  negatively  related  to  undesirable  things  i.e  stress  anxiety,  turnover  intentions -­  Psycap  interventions  (PCI)  focus  on  enhancing  each  of  the  components  of  psycap -­  one  way  for  orgs.  to  improve  employee  health  and  well  being  is  to  develop  their  Psycap Talent  Management  and  Employee  Engagement -­  orgs.  becoming  increasingly  concerned  with  talent  and  employee  engagement -­  talent  ranks  second  most  critical  challenge  behind  business  growth -­  Talent  Management  an  orgs.  processes  for  attracting,  developing,  retaining,  and  utilizing people  with  the  required  skills  to  meet  current  and  future  business  needs -­  ability  of  org.  to  attract/retain  -­-­>  now  especially  critical  -­-­>  firms  struggling  to  compete  and survive -­  orgs.  struggling  to  find  qualified  individuals -­  changing  demographics:  dramatic  shortage  of  skilled  workers  over  next  10  year  s -­  baby  boomers  will  begin  to  retire  in  next  few  years  =  creating  large  skill  gap -­  30%  shortfall  of  workers  between  ages  25-­44 -­  increasing  willingness  of  knowledge  workers  to  relocate  anywhere  in  the  world  and  fewer  Cdns

12

entering  skills  trades=  canadians  will  face  increasingly  severe  shortages  of  labour -­  currently:  shortages  in  scientific,  technical,high  tech  industries  and  senior  management communications  marketing  positions -­  more  than  60  %  of  Cdn  employers  say  that  labour  shortages  are  limiting  productivity/efficiency -­  top  CEOs  of  Cda  -­-­>  believe  retaining  employees  has  become  their  #1  priority  +attracting  new employees  is  4th  priority,  behind  financial  performance  and  profitability -­  3/4  of  employers  say  they  cannot  find  competent  employees -­  orgs.  become  increasingly  concerned  about  employee  engagement -­  work  management:  a  positive  work  related  state  of  mind  that  is  characterized  by  vigour, dedication  and  absorption -­  only  1/3  of  workers  are  engaged  and  engaged  workers  have  more  positive  work  attitudes  + higher  job  performance -­  employee  engagement=  key  for  success  and  competitiveness  ,  has  significant  impact  on productivity,  customer  satisfaction,  profitability,  innovation  and  quality -­  sample  of  65  firms  (different  industries),  top  25%  on  engagement  index  had  greater  return  on assets  (ROA),  greater  profitability,  more  than  double  shareholder  value  (compared  to  bottom  25%) -­  OB  and  talent  management  +  employee  engagement -­  OB  provides  means  for  orgs  to  be  designed/managed  in  way  to  optimize  attraction development,  retention  engagement  and  performance  of  talent -­  i.e.  providing  opportunities  for  learning  and  designing  challenging,  meaningful,  rewarding  jobs -­  i.e.  providing  recognition  and  monetary  rewards  for  performance -­  managing  diverse  workforce,  offering  flexible  work  arrangements,  providing  effective  leadership Corporate  Social  Responsibility  (CSR) -­  CSR-­  an  org.  taking  responsibility  for  the  impact  of  its  decisions  and  actions  on  its  stakeholders -­  orgs.  overall  impact  on  society  at  large  and  extends  beyond  interests  of  shareholders -­  more  so  interests  of  employees  and  community  in  which  it  operates -­  CSR -­  involves  variety  of  issues -­  i.e.  community  involvement,  environmental  protection,  safe  products,  ethical  marketing, employee  diversity,  local/global  labour  practices -­  has  to  do  with  how  an  org.  performs  its  core  functions  or  producing  goods  and  providing services  and  that  is  does  so  in  a  socially  responsible  way -­  Social  responsibility  and  OB -­  has  to  do  with  treatment  of  employees,  management  practices  ie.  managing  diversity, work  family  balance,  employee  equity -­  orgs.  rank  high  on  CSR:  good  employers  because  of  the  way  they  treat  their  employees and  management  practices  promoting  employee  well  being -­  CSr  also  involves -­  environmental,  social  and  governance  issues  (ESG) -­  orgs.  social  and  environmental  actions  are  increasingly  scrutinized  L  shareholders  and consumers  are  holding  firms  to  higher  CSR  standards  on  environment,  employment,  social  issues -­  governance  issues  i.e.  executive  compensation  receive  greater  attention

13

-­  2009  Macleans  inaugural  list  of  50  Most  Socially  responsible  Corporations  -­-­>  those  that  raises standards  of  good  corporate  citizens -­  these  rankings  have  led  to  increasing  number  of  orgs.  placing  greater  emphasis  on  CSR initiatives -­  Sodexo  canada:  made  Sodexo  Foundation:  donates  meals  to  at-­risk  youths -­  Cameo  Corp:  world’s  largest  producers  of  uranium,  community  investment  program  that  focuses on  improving  the  quality  of  life  for  people  in  communities  it  operates -­  Unilever  Canada:  community  virility  fund  and  donates  1%  of  pre  tax  profits  to  initiatives  in childrens  health  and  water  resources  (both  linked  to  its  products) -­  concern  for  environment  and  green  initiatives -­  Sodexo  Canada:  one  of  canada's  greenest  corps. -­  green  programs  require  change  in  employees  attitudes  and  behaviours -­  i.e.  Fairmont  Hotels  and  Resorts  :  employees  volunteer  to  be  on  green  teams  that  meet month  to  brainstorm  environmental  initiatives -­  program=  positive  effect  on  employee  engagement  and  motivation -­  employees  are  proud  to  be  working  for  environmentally  friendly  org. -­  Hudson  bays  company:  published  CSr  report  every  year -­  Husky  Injection  Molding  System:  environmental  responsibility  programs Applied  Focus:  Green  Management  at  the  Delta  Chelsea  Hotel -­  2008:  Turtle  Island  Recycling  tour -­  helped  get  employees  engaged  in  green  initiatives  by  providing  big  picture  of  what  happens  to waste  from  hotel  and  impact  on  environment -­  08:  76%  of  waste  from  hotel,  recycled,  and  09:  figure  risen  to  81% -­  employee  orientation  includes  a  presentation  on  hotels  green  initiatives  and  policies -­  an  internal  newsletter  dedicated  a  page  to  environment,  posters  o  elevators,  message boards  etc. -­  also  set  goals  to  be  carbon  neutral  -­-­>  LivClean  EcoStay  Program:  guests  can  voluntarily pay  $1  per  stay  to  support  emission-­reduction  projects The  Manager’s  Notebook:  Toronto’s  Troubled  Transit  System  (pg.  25  read  over  section)