YEAR 3 (2011) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT THREE MILE CREEK RESTORATION SITE AVERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA (Contract #16-D06125-A) FULL DELIVERY PROJECT TO PROVIDE STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION IN THE FRENCH BROAD RIVER BASIN CATALOGING UNIT 06010108
Prepared for: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Prepared by:
And
Restoration Systems, LLC 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Axiom Environmental, Inc. 20 Enterprise Street, Suite 7 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 October 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Restoration Systems, L.L.C. has completed restoration of streams and wetlands at the Three Mile Creek Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the “Site”) to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program in fulfilling stream and wetland mitigation goals. The Site, located in southwestern Avery County approximately 5.2 miles northeast of Spruce Pine, North Carolina, provides 8103 stream mitigation units and 3.7 riparian wetland mitigation units as described in the As-Built Mitigation Plan dated April 2009. The Site is located in United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 06010108010020 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin 04-0306) of the French Broad River Basin. This report serves as the Year 3 (2011) annual monitoring report. Primary activities at the Site included 1) stream restoration, 2) stream enhancement, 3) stream preservation, 4) wetland restoration and enhancement, 5) soil scarification, and 6) plant community restoration. Project restoration efforts provide 8103 Stream Mitigation Units and 3.7 riverine Wetland Mitigation Units. Eight vegetation plots (10-meter by 10-meter in size) were established and permanently monumented. These plots were surveyed in June 2011 for the Year 3 (2011) monitoring season. Vegetation sampling across the Site was above the required average density with 612 planted stems per acre surviving. In addition, each individual plot was above success criteria. Eleven cross-sections and 3600 linear feet of longitudinal profiles were measured for the Year 3 (2011) monitoring. As a whole, monitoring measurements indicate that there have been minimal changes in both the longitudinal profile and cross-sections as compared to as-built data. The as-built channel geometry compares favorably with the emulated, stable E/C type stream reach as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and construction plans. Current monitoring has demonstrated dimension, pattern, and profile were stable over the course of the monitoring period. During a heavy, flashy rain event in April 2011, an outer bend near Cross-section 6 was compromised; however, up- and downstream of the outerbend remained stable. The outer bend was repaired and replanted in September 2011, and is doing well. The outerbend will continue to be monitored closely. The only remaining stream problem area noted within the Site during the Year 3 (2011) monitoring year includes aggradation within a portion of Tributary 1. Aggradation has resulted from the installation of a dirt driveway on the neighboring property in 2010. This reach should be watched over time to ascertain any instability. All three of the monitored gauges within restoration areas were inundated/saturated within 12 inches of the surface for greater than 12.5 percent of the growing season, which extends from May 1 to October 11 (163 days). In summary, Site vegetation, streams, and wetland hydrology met success criteria for Year 3 (2011) monitoring.
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Executive Summary
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... i 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Location and Setting ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach...................................................................... 1 1.4 Project History and Background ................................................................................................... 3 2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ............................................................ 5 2.1 Vegetation Assessment ................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria .................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas .................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Stream Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Stream Success Criteria ........................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 Bankfull Events ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2.4 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment ..................................................... 7 2.2.5 Quantitative Stream Measurements ...................................................................................... 8 2.3 Wetland Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Wetland Success Criteria ...................................................................................................... 8 2.3.2 Wetland Problem Areas ........................................................................................................ 8 2.3.3 Wetland Criteria Attainment ................................................................................................. 8 3.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................................. 13 4.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 15
FIGURES Figure 1. Site Location ............................................................................................................... Appendix A Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View ................................................................................................ Appendix A
TABLES Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives .................................................................................... 2 Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ......................................................................................... 3 Table 3. Project Contacts ............................................................................................................................. 4 Table 4. Project Background........................................................................................................................ 4 Table 5. Characteristic Tree Species ............................................................................................................ 5 Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events ..................................................................................................... 6 Table 7. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .............................................................. 8 Table 8. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary............................................................................. 9 Table 9A. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ................................................................... 10 Table 9B. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ................................................................... 11 Table 9C. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ................................................................... 12 Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment for Year 3 (2011) ......................................................................... 13 Table 11. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results ................................................................................. 13 Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results ............................................................................ 14
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
page i
APPENDICES APPENDIX A. FIGURES 1. Figure 1. Site Location 2. Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View APPENDIX B. VEGETATION DATA 3. Vegetation Survey Data Tables 4. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos APPENDIX C. GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA 1. Tables C1. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment 2. Cross-section Plots and Tables 3. Longitudinal Profile Plots 4. Representative Structure Photographs APPENDIX D. HYDROLOGY DATA 2011 Groundwater Gauge Data
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
page ii
1.0
PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting Restoration Systems, L.L.C. (Restoration Systems) has completed restoration of streams and wetlands at the Three Mile Creek Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the “Site”) to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in fulfilling stream and wetland mitigation goals. The Site, located in southwestern Avery County approximately 5.2 miles northeast of Spruce Pine, North Carolina, provides 8103 stream mitigation units and 3.7 riparian wetland mitigation units as described in the April 2009 As-Built Mitigation Plan (Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A). The Site is located in United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 06010108010020 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin 04-03-06) of the French Broad River Basin. Directions to the Site: From Asheville or Raleigh, take I-40 to Marion; take NC 226 north through Linville Falls; go left on NC 194; site is ~4.5 miles on left Or, from Asheville take 19/23 North to 19E through Spruce Pine to NC 194 Take a right on NC 194 and travel approximately 1.5 miles The Site is on the right Latitude, Longitude of Site: 35.9827°N, 81.9843°W (NAD83/WGS84) 1.2 Project Objectives The primary components of the restoration project included 1) construction of a stable, riffle-pool stream channel; 2) enhancement of water quality functions within and downstream of the Site; 3) creation of a natural vegetated buffer along restored stream channels; 4) restoration of jurisdictional riverine wetlands in the Site; 5) improvement of aquatic habitat and species diversity by enhancing stream bed variability; and 6) restoration of wildlife functions associated with a riparian corridor/stable stream. 1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach A 26.68-acre conservation easement was placed on the Site to incorporate all restoration activities. The Site contains 4.8 acres of hydric soil, Three Mile Creek, 12 unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Three Mile Creek, Fork Creek, and adjacent floodplains, which represent the primary hydrologic features of the Site. Prior to construction, the project was characterized by agricultural land utilized for Christmas tree and ornamental landscape nursery plant production, timber harvest, and livestock grazing. Agricultural practices included the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and relocation, dredging, and straightening of onsite streams. In addition, hydric soils were disturbed due to regular plowing and vegetation maintenance, hoof shear from livestock, and the removal of groundwater hydrology inputs from the rerouting and straightening of Site tributaries. Restoration of Site streams and wetlands will result in positive benefits for water quality and biological diversity in the Three Mile Creek watershed. Targeted mitigation efforts at the Site were accomplished by: 1. Removing nonpoint and point sources of pollution associated with agricultural practices including a) cessation of broadcasting fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural chemicals into and adjacent to the Site and b) provide a forested riparian buffer to treat surface runoff. 2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing bank erosion associated with vegetation maintenance and plowing adjacent to Site streams and wetlands and b) planting a forested riparian buffer adjacent to Site streams and wetlands. 3. Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and sediment loads by restoring a stable dimension, pattern, and profile supported by natural in-stream habitat and grade/bank stabilization structures. Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
page 1
4. Promoting floodwater attenuation by a) reconnecting bankfull stream flows to the abandoned floodplain terrace; b) restoring secondary, dredged, straightened, and entrenched tributaries, thereby reducing floodwater velocities within smaller catchment basins; c) restoration of depressional floodplain wetlands and floodwater storage capacity within the Site, and d) revegetating Site floodplains to increase frictional resistance on floodwaters. 5. Improving aquatic habitat with bed variability and the use of in-stream structures upstream of a reach identified by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission as supporting naturally reproducing rainbow trout populations. 6. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area that is developed for agricultural production. As constructed, the Site restored historic stream and wetland functions, which existed onsite prior to channel straightening and dredging, agricultural impacts, and vegetation removal. Stream construction of meandering, E/C stream channel resulted in 6057 linear feet of stream restoration, 618 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level I), 875 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level II), 6421 linear feet of stream preservation, 2.5 acres of riverine wetland restoration, and 2.3 acres of riverine wetland enhancement (Table 1). Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives Station Range
Mitigation Type
Priority Approach
Existing Linear Footage/ Acreage
Designed Linear Footage/ Acreage**
SMU/ WMU
1+25-37+30
Restoration
1
3552
3495
3495
37+30-42+15
Enhancement I
2
485
485
323.3
Fork Creek
0+00-1+58
Enhancement II
NA
158
158
63.2
Tributary 1
0+00-3+84
Restoration
1
172
384
384
0+00-1+33
Enhancement I
2
133
133
88.7
NA
Enhancement II
NA
351
351
140.4
0+00-3+40
Restoration
1
252
340
340
NA
Preservation
NA
1808
1808
361.6
0+00-2+28
Restoration
1
136
198
198
NA
Enhancement II
NA
366
366
146.4
0+00-2+44
Restoration
1
150
214
214
NA
Preservation
NA
931
931
186.2
0+00-2+44
Restoration
1
124
214
214
NA
Preservation
NA
681
681
136.2
Restoration Segment/ Reach ID* Three Mile Creek
Tributary 2
Tributary 3
Tributary 4
Tributary 5
Tributary 6a
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Comment Restoration of a straightened channel on new location. Restoration of dimension and profile in place. Removal of invasive species and supplemental planting. Restoration of a straightened channel on new location. Restoration of dimension and profile in place. Removal of invasive species and supplemental planting. Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Preservation of existing reach Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Removal of invasive species and supplemental planting. Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Preservation of stable, forested stream reaches. Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Preservation of stable, forested stream reaches.
page 2
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives (continued) Station Range
Mitigation Type
Priority Approach
Existing Linear Footage/ Acreage
Designed Linear Footage/ Acreage**
SMU/ WMU
0+00-2+75
Restoration
1
146
245
245
0+00-3+43
Restoration
1
519
343
343
242
Restoration
1
242
242
242
0+00-0+43
NA
NA
0
43
0
0+00-0+92
Restoration
1
72
92
92
228
Restoration
1
228
228
228
NA
Preservation
NA
49
49
9.8
Tributary 11b
0+00-0+62
Restoration
1
51
62
62
Preservation Tributaries
NA
Preservation
NA
2952
2952
590.4
Restoration Segment/ Reach ID* Tributary 7
Tributary 8
Tributary 9
Tributary 11a
TOTAL SMUs
Riparian/ Riverine Wetlands
Comment Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Filling a ditched springhead systems and braiding restoration channel. Tie spring head to design channel. Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Braiding surface flow of restoration channel. Preservation of stable, forested stream reaches. Restoration of a ditched and disturbed channel on new location. Preservation of stable, forested stream reaches.
8103
--
Restoration
--
--
2.5
2.5
--
Enhancement
--
--
2.3
1.2
Reconstructing site tributaries, filling ditched channels and ditches, rehydrating floodplain soils, and planting with native forest vegetation. Planting with native forest vegetation.
TOTAL WMUs 3.7 * Locations of each tributary and restoration type are depicted on Sheets 1-23 in Appendix A (As-built Survey) ** Constructed linear footage excludes crossings or areas outside of easement; therefore, is slightly shorter than stationing depicts. Priority Approach 1 – Convert incised stream to stable stream at historic floodplain elevation. Priority Approach 2 – Convert incised stream to stable stream and reestablish floodplain at present location.
1.4 Project History and Background Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background information are summarized in Tables 2-4. Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report Restoration Plan Construction Completion Site Planting Mitigation Plan/As-builts Year 1 Monitoring (2009) Year 2 Monitoring (2010) Year 3 Monitoring (2011) Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Data Collection Completion August 2007 NA NA March 2009 October 2009 October 2010 October 2011
Actual Completion or Delivery September 2007 January 2009 February 2009 April 2009 September 2009 September 2010 October 2011 page 3
Table 3. Project Contacts Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 George Howard and John Preyer (919) 755-9490
Designer and Monitoring Performer
Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 Grant Lewis (919) 215-1693 Land Mechanics Designs, Inc. 126 Circle G Lane Willow Spring, North Carolina 27592 Lloyd Glover (919) 422-3392 Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Road Edenton, North Carolina 27932 Dwight McKinney (252) 482-8491 K2 Design Group, PA 5758 US Highway 70 East Goldsboro, North Carolina 27534 John Rudolph (919) 751-0075
Construction Contractor
Planting Contractor
Surveying Contractor
Table 4. Project Background Project County Drainage Area
Drainage impervious cover estimate (%) Stream Order
Physiographic Region Ecoregion Rosgen Classification of As-built Dominant Soil Types Reference Site ID USGS HUC NCDWQ Subbasin NCDWQ Classification Any portion of any project segment 303d listed? Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed segment? Reasons for 303d listing or stressor % of project easement fenced
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Avery County, North Carolina Three Mile Creek: 5.1 square miles Fork Creek: 1.8 square miles Tributaries: 0.02-0.2 square mile Travel North on US Route 19E for ~ 5 miles -> Turn Right on NC Route 194 and Travel ~1.5 miles -> Site is on Right -> Latitude, Longitude : 35.9827°N, 81.9843°W (NAD83/WGS84)
Site Location
Spruce Pine
0
1 mi.
4 mi.
1:158,400 Source: 1977 North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer, pp. 32 & 33.
Dwn. by: 2126 Rowland Pond Dr Willow Spring, NC 27592 (919) 215-1693 (919) 341-3839 fax
SITE LOCATION THREE MILE CREEK RESTORATION SITE Avery County, North Carolina
Ckd by:
CLF
Date:
Nov 2008 Project:
FIGURE
WGL
07-004
1
³
Legend Easement Boundary
! (
End Monitoring Reach Station 36+00
Groundwater Gauge Locations Vegetation Plot Locations Structure Photo Points
xse ct 1 1
Cross-section Locations
1 ! (
P
1
In-stream Structures
b u ta r y
( !
Stream Restoration
ri
xsect 10R
T
Stream Enhancement (Level 1) ( 3!
Stream Enhancement (Level 2)
1
( 2!
Prepared for:
( 1!
e xs
ct
9R
Streams ( 4!
Stream Monitoring Reach Wetland Restoration Areas
t6
P xse ct
5R
xs e c
4P xs e
ct
7
( 6!
ar ut
ut ar y
3
4
Tributary
3
tary ib u
2
Project:
THREE MILE CREEK RESTORATION SITE
y5
Tr ib
( 7!
y
ut ar
( 14 !
R
ry 6A
t3
( 10 !
6B
ec
5
( 8!
( 2 5!
tary
Thr e e m l e Creek i
Tri b
ut a
( 11 !
( 9!
ib Tr
( 12 !
4
Tri b u
xs
( 13 !
6
k re e
Start Monitoring Reach Station 00+00
e xs
xsect 8P
R
ib Tr
rk C Fo
Marsh Treatment Areas
7 ct
Tr
Wetland Enhancement Areas
Avery County, NC Title:
7
2 ! (
( 15 !
ry uta Trib
b Tri
8 Tr ib ut a
xs e
1R ct xse ary 9 ut
( 16 !
3 ! (
8
rie s
11 A
&
ct
MONITORING PLAN VIEW
2P
B
Drawn by:
CLF Date:
SEPT 2010 Scale:
1:3400 Project No.:
10-001 Backround Imagery: 1998 color infrared aerial photography for Avery County
0
200
400
FIGURE
800
1,200
Feet 1,600
2
APPENDIX B VEGETATION DATA 1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables 2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendices
Corri Faquin Report Prepared By 7/11/2011 14:44 Date Prepared RestorationSystems-2011-A.mdb database name C:\Axiom\Business\CVS database location CORRI-PC computer name 61538304 file size DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT-----------Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data. Metadata Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes. Proj, planted Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all Proj, total stems natural/volunteer stems. List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.). Plots Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots. Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species. Vigor by Spp List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each. Damage Damage values tallied by type for each species. Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each plot. Damage by Plot Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded. A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead ALL Stems by Plot and spp and missing stems are excluded. PROJECT SUMMARY------------------------------------Threemile Project Code Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site project Name Description River Basin length(ft) stream-to-edge width (ft) area (sq m) Required Plots (calculated) 8 Sampled Plots
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendices
Living planted stems, excluding live stakes, per acre: Negative (red) numbers indicate the project failed to reach requirements in a particular year. Project Code Threemile
River Basin
Project Name Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year 3 612
Total stems, including planted stems of all kinds (including live stakes) and natural/volunteer stems: Project Code Threemile
River Basin
Project Name Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year 3 688
Date Sampled
Planted Living Stems
Planted Living Stems EXCLUDING Live Stakes
Dead/Missing Stems
Natural (Volunteer) Stems
Total Living Stems
Total Living Stems EXCLUDING Live Stakes
Planted Living Stems per ACRE
Planted Living Stems EXCLUDING Live Stakes PER ACRE
Natural (Volunteer) Stems PER ACRE
Total Living Stems PER ACRE
Total Living Stems EXCLUDING Live Stakes PER ACRE
# species
Plot Data
6/27/2011 6/27/2011 6/27/2011 6/27/2011 7/27/2011
13 10 12 18 13
13 10 12 18 13
1 4 2 3 1
0 6 2 2 2
13 16 14 20 15
13 16 14 20 15
526 405 486 728 526
526 405 486 728 526
0 243 81 81 81
526 647 567 809 607
526 647 567 809 607
4 5 4 4 3
6/27/2011 to 6/28/2011
12
12
0
0
12
12
486
486
0
486
486
4
6/27/2011
16
16
12
2
18
18
647
647
81
728
728
3
6/27/2011 to 6/28/2011
28
27
3
0
28
27
1133
1093
0
1133
1093
6
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendices
Vigor Vigor 0 1 2 3 4
Count Percent 5 3.4 1 0.7 11 7.4 44 29.7 66 44.6 21 14.2 Missing
Vigor by Species Species Alnus serrulata Asimina triloba Celtis laevigata Cephalanthus occidentalis Cornus amomum Diospyros virginiana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Quercus alba Quercus falcata Quercus michauxii Quercus pagoda Salix sericea Cercis canadensis Quercus rubra Platanus occidentalis 15
CommonName hazel alder pawpaw sugarberry common buttonbush silky dogwood common persimmon green ash white oak southern red oak swamp chestnut oak cherrybark oak silky willow eastern redbud northern red oak American sycamore 15
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
4 1
3
2
1 0 Missing Unknown 1 1
2 1 3 3 12 6 4 3 3 7 5 2 10 7 1 1 2 3 4 17 7 1 14 2 66 44 11 1
12
1
2 1 2
1 1 1 5
2 1 1 21
Appendices
Damage Damage (no damage) Insects Unknown Site Too Wet Vine Strangulation Deer Diseased
Count 111 12 11 6 3 3 2
Percent Of Stems 75 8.1 7.4 4.1 2 2 1.4
Damage by Species Species
CommonName
Count of Damage Categories
Alnus serrulata Asimina triloba Celtis laevigata Cephalanthus occidentalis Cercis canadensis Cornus amomum Diospyros virginiana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Platanus occidentalis Quercus alba Quercus falcata Quercus michauxii Quercus pagoda Quercus rubra Salix sericea 15
hazel alder pawpaw sugarberry common buttonbush eastern redbud silky dogwood common persimmon green ash American sycamore white oak southern red oak swamp chestnut oak cherrybark oak northern red oak silky willow 15
0 1 0 0 4 1 10 1 1 6 1 5 0 7 0 37
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
(no damage)
Deer
Diseased Insects
Site Too Wet
Unknown
Vine Strangulation
1 1 1 3 8 2 23 6 17 6 7 15 1 20 1 111
4 2
1 2
6 1
1 6 1 5 3 3
3 2
12
1 6
11
3
Appendices
Damage by Plot Plot
Count of Damage Categories
(No Damage)
Deer
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8
5 3 5 5 2 2 6 9 37
9 11 9 16 12 10 22 22 111
2
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Diseased
2 1
3
2
Insects
Site Too Wet
2 1 2 4 2 1
12
Unknown
1 1
6 6
1 6 2 11
Vine Strangulation 1 1
1 3
Appendices
Planted Stems by Plot and Species Species
CommonName
Alnus serrulata Asimina triloba Cephalanthus occidentalis Cercis canadensis Cornus amomum Diospyros virginiana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Platanus occidentalis Quercus alba Quercus falcata Quercus michauxii Quercus pagoda Quercus rubra Salix sericea 14
hazel alder pawpaw common buttonbush eastern redbud silky dogwood common persimmon green ash American sycamore white oak southern red oak swamp chestnut oak cherrybark oak northern red oak silky willow 14
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Total Planted Stems 1 1 3 9 3 21 7 16 10 7 17 1 25 1 122
# plots
avg# stems
1 1 2 3 3 4 2 5 1 1 3 1 5 1 14
1 1 1.5 3 1 5.25 3.5 3.2 10 7 5.67 1 5 1
1
2
3
4
1 1
2
5
6
7
8
5 1
2
2
1
1 1
1 2 4 2
7 3
11 3 5
4
2 10 7
1
8
10 13
10
12
8
3
1
4
18
13
12
16
Appendices
1 7 1 28
ALL Stems by Plot and Species Species
CommonName
Alnus serrulata Asimina triloba Celtis laevigata Cephalanthus occidentalis Cercis canadensis Cornus amomum Diospyros virginiana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Pinus Platanus occidentalis Quercus alba Quercus falcata Quercus michauxii Quercus pagoda Quercus rubra Salix Salix sericea 17
hazel alder pawpaw sugarberry common buttonbush eastern redbud silky dogwood common persimmon green ash pine American sycamore white oak southern red oak swamp chestnut oak cherrybark oak northern red oak willow silky willow 17
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Total Stems 8 1 1 3 10 5 23 7 1 17 10 7 18 1 26 2 1 141
# plots 3 1 1 2 3 5 4 2 1 5 1 1 3 1 5 2 1 17
avg# stems 2.67 1 1 1.5 3.33 1 5.75 3.5 1 3.4 10 7 6 1 5.2 1 1
1
2
3
6
4
5
1
1
6
7
8
1 1 1 1 1
1 2 4
9
2
3
2 1
1
5 1
3
2
11 3 1 6
4
2 10 7
2
8
10
4
8 1
4
1 14
16
1 7 1
14
22
15
12
20
1 28
Appendices
Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Year 3 (2011) Annual Monitoring Vegetation Plot Photos Taken July 2011
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendices
APPENDIX C GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA 1. Table C1. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment 2. Cross-section Plots and Tables 3. Longitudinal Profile Plots 4. Representative Structure Photographs
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendices
Table C1. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment Threemile Creek
Feature Category
A. Riffles
B. Pools C. Thalweg
D. Meanders
E. Bed General F. Bank
G. Vanes H. Wads / Boulders
Total number 37 37 3737 37 37 38 38 37 37 37 38 NA 38 38 NA
Total Number / feet in unstable state NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA NA 0
% Perform in Stable Condition 100% 100% 97% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Feature Perform. Mean or Total
NA
NA
0
100%
100%
37 14 14 14 14 NA NA
37 14 14 14 14 NA NA
100 NA NA NA NA NA NA
100% NA NA NA NA NA NA
100%
(# Stable) Number Performing as Intended 37 37 36 37 36 38 38 38 37 37 38 NA 38 38 NA
2. Channel bed degradation – areas of increasing down-cutting or head cutting? 1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank 1. Free of back or arm scour? 2. Height appropriate? 3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate? 4. Free of piping or other structural failures? 1. Free of scour? 2. Footing stable?
Metric (per As-built and reference baselines) 1. Present 2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)? 3. Facet grade appears stable? 4. Minimal evidence of embedding / fining? 5. Length appropriate? 1. Present? (e.g. not subject to severe aggrad. Or migrat.?) 2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D:Mean Bkf>1.6?) 3. Length appropriate? 1. Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centering? 2. Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering? 1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion? 2. Of those eroding, # w/concomitant point bar formation? 3. Apparent Rc within spec? 4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief? 1. General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
99%
100% 100%
100%
100% NA
Station 0.00 3.10 6.18 8.68 10.12 10.97 11.57 11.98 12.56 13.52 13.98 14.86 16.33 17.47 18.67 22.10 24.6
Elevation 263.61 263.82 263.92 263.94 263.93 263.86 263.38 263.38 263.17 263.25 263.55 263.47 264.38 264.38 264.37 264.10 264.09
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 1, Riffle 0.05 5/54/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
263.9 2.2 5.2 264.6 >80 0.7 0.4 12.3 >5 1.0 Stream Type
E
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 1, Riffle 265
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
264 Bankfull Flood Prone Area As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09
263 0
MY-02 5/25/010
10
20
Station (feet)
MY-03 5/4/11
Station 0.00 5.08 6.03 8.51 9.65 10.92 11.45 12.11 13.07 13.99 14.93 16.42 17.71 18.85 22.92 23.6 27.6 29.0
Elevation 263.00 263.53 263.60 263.89 264.06 263.98 263.73 263.19 262.89 262.79 262.93 263.32 263.81 264.25 264.11 264.45 264.26 264.28
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 2, Pool 0.05 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
264.0 5.5 7.7 1.2 0.7 Stream Type
E
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 2, Pool 265
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
264 Bankfull
263
Flood Prone Area As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09
262 0
10
Station (feet)
20
MY-02 5/25/10 MY-03 5/4/11
30
Station 0.00 1.33 3.05 5.83 9.10 10.69 15.03 16.37 18.90 20.40 20.87 21.38 22.09 23.79 25.6 27.0 27.8 28.8 29.6 30.9 31.9 33.6 34.7 36.8 39.0 39.7 41.1 42.72 44.02 45.98 53.61 55.39 56.20 57.75 61.02 64.31
Elevation 264.27 264.09 263.96 264.24 262.97 262.75 262.72 262.67 261.52 260.74 260.15 259.82 259.72 259.79 260.27 260.44 260.61 260.58 260.46 260.47 260.65 260.68 260.87 260.90 260.71 261.22 261.62 261.63 262.45 262.68 262.89 263.52 263.90 263.58 263.48 263.73
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 3, Riffle 4.7 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
262.6 48.1 28.5 265.5 >65 2.9 1.7 16.9 >5 1.0 Stream Type
E/C
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 3, Riffle 266
264
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
262 Bankfull Flood Prone Area
260 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
As-Built 11/6/08 70 MY-01 8/18/09
258
MY-02 5/25/10
Station (feet)
MY-03 5/4/11
Station -0.5 4.1 6.8 8.3 13.3 14.2 15.0 16.3 17.5 18.0 18.4 19.5 21.7 23.5 25.0 26.3 28.0 29.8 30.7 31.5 33.1 34.7 35.9 38.0 40.3 42.7 47.0 49.0 50.7 52.3 54.8 56.5 57.8 62.1
Elevation 269.3 269.3 269.4 269.5 269.6 269.6 269.1 268.0 267.5 267.4 266.1 266.1 266.0 266.1 266.28 266.39 266.40 266.79 267.26 267.57 267.79 267.78 268.24 268.58 268.93 269.83 269.94 269.73 269.79 269.92 269.85 270.77 271.35 271.77
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 4, Pool 4.7 5/4/2011 Dean, Perkinson SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
269.5 57.4 27.3 3.4 2.1 Stream Type
E
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 4, Pool 273
271
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
269 Bankfull
267
Flood Prone Area As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/08
265 0
10
20
30
Station (feet)
40
50
MY-02 5/25/10 60 MY-03 5/4/11
70
Station 0.0 2.2 2.9 3.6 4.9 6.0 6.5 7.1 7.9 9.6 10.2 10.9 11.9 12.7 13.8 15.4 17.7 19.6 20.1 22.0 23.3 23.8 25.8 27.3 28.2 29.8 30.9 31.6 32.8 36.7 41.8 43.5 44.3 45.8 48.0 49.6
Elevation 275.0 275.0 275.2 275.1 274.8 274.7 274.1 273.3 273.1 272.8 272.8 272.9 273.1 272.95 272.66 272.48 272.51 272.44 272.35 272.27 272.06 272.06 272.08 272.52 273.10 273.43 273.99 274.82 275.22 275.06 275.16 275.70 276.25 276.34 276.32 276.51
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 5, Riffle 4.7 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
275.1 59.4 29.0 278.1 >65 3.0 2.0 14.2 >5 1.0 Stream Type
E/C
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 5, Riffle 279
277
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
275 Bankfull Flood Prone Area
273
As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09
271 0
10
20
30 Station (feet)
40
MY-02 5/25/10
50 5/4/11 MY-03
60
Station 4.5 8.8 11.7 13.3 14.0 16.0 17.3 18.3 19.1 19.6 20.4 21.5 23.5 25.4 27.0 28.3 28.6 29.5 30.4 31.8 33.4 36.1 38.9 41.4 43.4 45.4
Elevation 280.0 279.9 280.0 280.1 279.8 278.8 278.5 278.4 278.7 278.4 277.4 277.1 276.6 276.0 275.8 275.6 276.1 276.7 277.8 279.4 279.9 279.9 280.0 280.1 280.2 280.3
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 6, Pool 4.7 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
279.9 44.1 19.5 4.3 2.3 E/C
Stream Type
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 6, Pool 283
281 Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
279 Bankfull Flood Prone Area
277
As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09
275
MY-02 5/25/10
0
10
20
30 Station (feet)
40
MY-03 5/4/11
50
Station 0.0 3.2 7.3 9.9 11.5 14.1 15.4 17.3 18.1 19.0 19.8 22.2 22.5 24.7 26.0 27.5 29.2 30.6 31.4 31.9 32.4 33.1 33.5 33.8 34.3 35.5 36.1 36.8 37.9 38.5 39.3 39.9 40.6 43.6 46.4 48.9
Elevation 283.8 283.7 283.7 283.7 283.9 283.9 283.4 282.0 281.9 281.8 281.6 281.5 281.5 281.55 281.30 281.38 281.38 281.27 281.31 281.31 281.19 281.19 281.45 281.31 281.51 281.75 282.02 282.56 283.75 284.03 284.00 284.08 283.97 283.85 284.15 284.44
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 7, Riffle 4.7 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
283.8 47.1 24.2 286.4 >65 2.6 1.9 12.4 >5 1.0 Stream Type
E/C
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 7, Riffle 288
286
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
284 Bankfull Flood Prone Area
282
As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09 MY-02 5/25/10
280 0
10
20
Station (feet)
30
40
MY-03 5/4/11
50
Station 0.0 3.6 5.0 7.6 9.7 11.7 13.5 14.6 16.0 17.0 17.9 18.6 20.0 22.4 26.9 29.9 30.3 31.1 32.7 34.2 39.6 44.6 48.2 50.4 53.5
Elevation 289.7 289.6 289.8 289.6 289.6 289.5 289.4 289.2 288.3 288.0 287.5 285.7 285.7 285.88 286.62 286.87 287.41 287.95 287.74 288.10 289.33 289.44 289.59 290.05 290.12
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 8, Pool 4.7 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
289.4 51.4 27.1 3.7 1.9 Stream Type
E/C
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 8, Pool 293
291
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
289 Bankfull Flood Prone Area
287
As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09 MY-02 5/25/10
285 0
10
20
30 Station (feet)
40
MY-03 50 5/4/11
60
Station 0.0 3.6 6.0 7.5 9.2 13.8 16.8 18.3 19.8 21.1 22.9 24.1 25.8 27.0 27.6 29.1 30.6 31.3 33.3 35.1 35.9 37.9 39.3 39.7 40.6 41.7 43.6 44.6 51.5 53.6 56.5 59.1
Elevation 296.0 295.6 295.3 294.8 294.7 294.5 294.5 294.4 293.8 292.9 292.5 292.6 292.4 292.41 292.52 292.33 292.53 292.27 291.99 292.10 292.16 292.65 292.85 292.52 292.98 293.33 294.58 294.78 295.12 295.43 296.63 296.63
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 9, Riffle 4.7 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
294.6 48.0 27.0 297.2 >65 2.6 1.8 15.2 >5 1.0 Stream Type
E/C
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 9, Riffle 299
297
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
295 Bankfull Flood Prone Area
293
As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09
291 0
10
20
30 Station (feet)
40
MY-02 5/25/10
50 5/4/11 MY-03
60
Station 0.0 2.5 5.2 8.3 9.3 10.5 11.3 11.9 12.5 13.8 14.8 15.4 15.7 16.1 17.3 18.6 20.7 23.8 25.4 26.9 29.8
Elevation 296.1 296.2 296.3 296.3 296.3 295.7 295.7 295.6 295.5 295.7 295.9 295.9 295.5 295.47 295.79 296.13 296.04 296.01 296.15 295.99 296.02
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 10, Riffle 0.05 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
296.1 3.4 8.7 296.8 >35 0.7 0.4 22.3 >5 1.0 Stream Type
E/C
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 10, Riffle 298 Bankfull Flood Prone Area
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
297
As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09 MY-02 5/25/10 MY-03 5/4/11
296
295 0
10
Station (feet)
20
30
Station 0.0 2.7 5.5 7.8 9.4 10.0 10.4 10.9 11.6 12.0 12.4 12.8 13.8 15.0 16.2 17.2 18.7 20.2 21.4 22.8 24.5 25.6
Elevation 297.5 297.6 297.7 298.0 298.1 298.0 297.9 297.9 298.0 298.1 298.1 298.0 298.0 297.87 297.95 297.87 297.90 297.88 298.05 298.08 297.93 297.80
French Broad Threemile Creek XS - 11, Pool 0.05 5/4/2011 Dean, Thomas SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
298.1 1.1 8.8 0.5 0.1 Stream Type
E/C
French Broad River Basin, Threemile Creek, XS - 11, Pool 299
Elevation (feet)
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
298
Bankfull
297
Flood Prone Area As-Built 11/6/08 MY-01 8/18/09
296 0
10
Station (feet)
20
MY-02 5/25/10 MY-03 5/4/11
30
Project Name Reach Feature Date Crew
Elevation (feet - arbitrary)
Station 0.0 37.1 93.1 98.8 107.4 121.0 130.4 138.8 144.7 197.0 226.7 236.5 250.9 253.2 281.5 325.5 346.6 370.6 384.2 420.6 438.2 448.3 457.1 484.0 494.7 513.8 517.6 543.8 559.5 602.6 627.8 651.9 655.0 696.0 94 713.6 741.3 754.4 92 821.6 845.2 867.7 871.4 90 893.4 932.0 943.4 955.7 88 964.5 990.6 1013.1 86 1021.3 1039.8 1053.0 1089.8 84 1106.2 1116.9 1131.8 82 1143.9 1164.3 1245.2 1254.5 80 1267.9 1279.9 0 1315.5 1357.4 1366.5 1379.4 1387.8
Threemile Creek - Profile 00+00 - 10+00 Profile 5/2/11 Dean, Thomas 2008 As-built Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 82.5 82.6 82.8 83.2 83.4 83.9 83.2 83.9 83.2 83.9 84.1 84.1 83.4 84.3 83.4 84.3 83.7 84.3 84.7 85.1 84.1 85.1 83.3 85.2 82.1 85.2 85.2 85.2 85.4 85.9 86.0 86.4 85.2 85.4 86.4 85.7 86.3 86.8 87.0 86.1 87.2 86.2 87.2 86.8 87.2 87.2 87.6 86.5 87.6 85.6 87.6 87.9 88.2 87.7 88.3 87.8 88.3 88.7 89.1 88.2 89.1 87.0 89.0 89.5 89.6 89.7 90.0 89.0 90.1 89.0 90.1 89.6 90.2 91.0 91.2 90.1 91.2 88.6 91.3 91.4 91.6 91.4 91.9 91.5 92.0 91.0 92.0 91.1 92.1 91.6 92.1 92.5 92.9 92.8 93.1 92.0 93.1 92.0 93.0 92.6 93.1 93.6 94.1 93.8 94.3 92.3 94.2 93.2 94.3 93.3 94.3 94.5 94.9 95.7 96.1 95.1 96.1 95.3 96.0 95.8 96.1100 96.3 96.6 96.9 97.3 96.2 97.3 96.4 97.2 96.9 97.3
Station -3.3 27.2 61.6 96.5 114.5 141.7 173.8 181.2 218.5 232.7 239.7 249.8 251.9 282.1 331.2 345.4 364.7 386.1 426.2 439.9 449.9 483.8 491.2 500.9 514.9 517.6 566.8 604.3 630.1 643.6 652.3 655.0 698.8 710.5 740.9 768.2 821.6 849.2 868.4 871.6 932.6 945.5 967.1 1015.0
2009 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 82.5 82.8 82.8 83.1 83.5 83.8 83.4 84.0 84.0 84.3 84.2 84.5 84.2 84.9 84.7 85.0 85.0 85.3 83.4 85.3 83.1 85.3 83.0 85.3 85.4 85.7 85.6 86.0 86.1 86.5 85.7 86.6 85.5 86.5 86.4 86.6 87.0 87.4 86.3 87.3 86.7 87.3 87.2 87.7 86.8 87.7 86.7 87.7 85.2 87.7 88.1 88.4 88.3 88.5 88.9 89.2 88.3 89.2 87.0 89.2 87.7 89.3 89.6 89.8 90.1 90.3 89.4 90.4 89.3 90.4 90.2 90.6 91.1 91.4 90.2 91.4 89.3 91.4 91.5 91.8 91.9 92.3 91.1 92.2 92.1 92.5 92.9 93.2
200
Station -3.0 42.3 81.9 95.6 104.5 120.8 133.0 139.8 148.7 178.9 188.0 205.8 231.4 250.9 257.5 300.3 326.5 340.3 361.3 378.5 397.6 430.0 444.7 462.4 490.8 505.6 519.5 525.1 566.6 610.4 634.0 658.1 662.6 704.6 717.3 734.5 758.1 785.0 827.2 855.8 874.2 879.3 912.9 919.7 945.9 957.1 971.5 999.7 1011.6
2010 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 82.5 82.8 82.9 83.4 83.6 84.0 83.5 84.0 83.5 84.0 83.8 84.3 83.5 84.5 83.4 84.4 83.9 84.6 84.1 84.7 84.7 85.0 84.6 85.4 84.0 85.4 82.6 85.4 85.3 85.6 86.0 86.3 85.8 86.5 85.5 86.5 85.3 86.5 85.4 86.5 86.4 86.7 86.9 87.4 86.1 87.4 86.7 87.4 87.0 87.6 86.4 87.6 84.7 87.6 88.0 88.4 88.2 Threemile88.5 Creek Year 88.6 89.2 88.2 89.2 87.0 89.2 89.5 89.8 89.8 90.4 88.9 90.4 89.1 90.4 89.6 90.4 90.4 90.8 90.7 91.4 90.2 91.4 88.6 91.4 91.5 91.8 91.5 92.0 91.5 92.1 91.4 92.3 91.2 92.3 91.7 92.3 92.6 93.0 91.8 93.2
300
2011 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation -3.0 82.5 83.1 15.8 82.0 83.2 45.0 82.9 83.8 55.9 83.3 84.1 63.1 82.8 84.1 82.5 82.8 84.2 113.7 83.3 84.5 143.6 84.0 84.8 158.3 83.1 84.8 163.7 82.8 84.8 177.4 83.3 85.1 210.3 84.1 85.2 224.1 84.5 85.5 233.4 83.9 85.5 242.0 84.4 85.6 248.5 84.6 85.6 255.8 83.7 85.5 257.7 84.1 258.5 85.5 85.8 291.0 85.3 86.2 302.3 85.1 86.1 337.2 83.5 86.2 350.1 85.2 86.2 388.5 85.6 86.4 428.9 86.7 87.6 441.7 86.1 457.8 86.1 87.7 488.3 86.7 87.9 86.4 87.8to 10+00 3499.4 (2011) Profile - Reach 00+00 510.9 85.6 87.9 524.9 85.0 87.8 527.4 88.1 88.5 567.5 88.2 88.8 611.9 88.8 89.6 632.7 87.6 89.6 651.8 87.7 666.0 89.4 667.0 699.8 89.6 90.5 708.5 88.8 90.6 727.4 89.1 90.6 779.6 89.6 91.0 812.4 90.6 91.4 831.8 90.4 91.6 838.6 90.1 91.7 869.1 88.6 91.7 884.0 89.0 91.6 885.1 91.6 92.0 936.9 91.2 92.4 973.6 91.4 92.5 1000.6 92.3 93.1 1019.6 92.3 93.3
400
500
Avg. Water Surface Slope Riffle Length Avg. Riffle Slope Pool Length Pool to Pool Spacing
600
As-built 0.0098 51 0.0154 46 -------
2009 0.0097 53 0.0143 38 0.0008
700
Distance (feet) As-built (2008) Bed
Year 1 (2009) Bed
Year 2 (2010) Bed
Year 3 (2011) Bed
Year 3 (2011) Water Surface
2010 0.0098 51 0.0148 44 0.0038
800
2011 0.0097 50 0.0173 46 0.0052
900
1000
Project Name Reach Feature Date Crew
Threemile Creek - Profile 10+00 - 20+00 Profile 5/2/11 Dean, Thomas
Elevation (feet - arbitrary)
2008 As-built Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 0.0 82.5 82.6 37.1 82.8 83.2 93.1 83.4 83.9 98.8 83.2 83.9 107.4 83.2 83.9 121.0 84.1 84.1 130.4 83.4 84.3 138.8 83.4 84.3 144.7 83.7 84.3 197.0 84.7 85.1 226.7 84.1 85.1 236.5 83.3 85.2 250.9 82.1 85.2 253.2 85.2 85.2 281.5 85.4 85.9 325.5 86.0 86.4 346.6 85.2 370.6 85.4 86.4 384.2 85.7 86.3 420.6 86.8 87.0 438.2 86.1 87.2 448.3 86.2 87.2 457.1 86.8 87.2 484.0 87.2 87.6 494.7 86.5 87.6 513.8 85.6 87.6 517.6 87.9 88.2 543.8 87.7 88.3 559.5 87.8 88.3 602.6 88.7 89.1 627.8 88.2 89.1 651.9 87.0 89.0 655.0 89.5 89.6 696.0 89.7 90.0 104 713.6 89.0 90.1 741.3 89.0 90.1 754.4 89.6 90.2 102 821.6 91.0 91.2 845.2 90.1 91.2 867.7 88.6 91.3 871.4 91.4 91.6 100 893.4 91.4 91.9 932.0 91.5 92.0 943.4 91.0 92.0 955.798 91.1 92.1 964.5 91.6 92.1 990.6 92.5 92.9 1013.1 92.8 93.1 1021.396 92.0 93.1 1039.8 92.0 93.0 1053.0 92.6 93.1 1089.8 93.6 94.1 94 1106.2 93.8 94.3 1116.9 92.3 94.2 1131.8 93.2 94.3 1143.992 93.3 94.3 1164.3 94.5 94.9 1245.2 95.7 96.1 1254.5 95.1 96.1 1267.990 95.3 96.0 1279.9 1000 95.8 96.1 1100 1315.5 96.3 96.6 1357.4 96.9 97.3 1366.5 96.2 97.3 1379.4 96.4 97.2 1387.8 96.9 97.3
Station 967.1 1015.0 1025.6 1036.6 1054.6 1082.7 1113.0 1120.3 1132.9 1146.8 1164.5 1201.0 1246.3 1254.6 1267.6 1277.0 1311.8 1358.9 1369.2 1378.7 1391.4 1412.1 1445.4 1465.7 1472.2 1483.4 1520.9 1535.2 1542.2 1561.5 1582.5 1615.2 1622.6 1635.5 1646.3 1660.0 1681.2 1689.0 1700.4 1708.2 1714.8 1721.6 1749.6 1759.2 1771.1 1784.0 1803.5 1836.9 1855.5 1872.0 1875.0 1911.9 1919.8 1928.7 1941.8 1976.7 1991.8 2010.1
2009 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 92.1 92.5 92.9 93.2 92.3 93.3 92.4 93.3 93.0 93.3 93.8 94.2 93.9 94.4 92.4 94.4 93.4 94.4 94.0 94.4 94.7 94.9 95.4 95.5 95.8 96.1 95.2 96.2 95.3 96.2 96.0 96.1 95.9 96.6 96.9 97.3 96.3 97.3 96.5 97.3 97.0 97.4 97.6 97.8 98.0 98.2 97.5 98.2 97.0 98.2 98.0 98.3 98.2 98.8 97.6 98.8 97.1 98.8 98.0 98.9 98.4 98.9 99.2 99.7 98.0 99.7 97.7 99.6 98.2 99.7 99.3 99.6 100.0 100.3 99.4 100.3 100.1 100.3 99.4 100.3 99.3 100.4 100.1 100.3 100.3 100.5 99.4 100.5 99.3 100.5 100.1 100.5 100.7 100.9 100.9 101.1 99.9 101.1 99.1 101.1 101.4 101.4 101.3 101.8 100.6 101.7 100.1 101.8 101.4 101.8 101.9 102.2 101.2 102.2 102.0 102.2
1200
Station 999.7 1011.6 1022.5 1033.7 1045.5 1061.4 1090.2 1113.1 1125.7 1137.4 1153.8 1172.3 1243.0 1254.6 1267.9 1284.4 1326.3 1360.3 1371.5 1379.2 1391.6 1409.4 1452.3 1468.7 1477.1 1485.0 1520.0 1535.3 1551.7 1565.7 1576.0 1583.7 1601.3 1618.6 1630.1 1640.4 1652.8 1661.3 1684.9 1696.8 1711.5 1722.3 1751.5 1761.2 1774.8 1787.2 1804.8 1837.0 1855.4 1870.9 1877.9 1912.3 1922.9 1931.9 1939.6 1978.1 1989.2 2000.1
2010 2011 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 92.6 93.0 990.6 92.3 93.1 91.8 93.2 1016.7 92.3 93.3 92.5 93.2 1032.7 91.9 93.4 92.1 93.3 1058.8 92.6 93.5 92.1 93.3 1078.4 94.0 94.3 92.9 93.3 1088.7 93.0 94.6 93.7 94.0 1103.5 92.8 94.6 93.8 94.4 1112.3 93.3 94.7 92.7 94.4 1119.0 93.5 94.7 92.9 94.4 1126.6 92.4 94.7 93.7 94.5 1150.6 93.7 94.7 94.7 95.0 1203.2 95.2 95.7 95.5 96.1 1231.1 95.3 96.3 95.3 96.1 1246.0 94.5 96.4 94.8 96.1 1254.4 94.6 96.4 95.5 96.1 1289.3 95.8 96.6 96.4 96.9 1310.1 96.1 97.0 96.6 97.2 1337.2 96.5 97.4 96.0 97.3 1353.4 96.2 97.4 96.3 97.2 1373.7 96.0 97.5 96.7 97.3 1393.1 96.5 97.4 97.2 97.7 1439.8 97.8 98.4 97.8 98.2 1475.3 97.3 98.6 97.4 98.3 1483.9 98.0 98.9 97.6 98.3 1509.6 98.4 99.2 97.9 98.3 1523.4 97.3 99.3 98.2 98.8 1540.3 96.3 99.4 97.5 98.9 1559.4 97.1 99.3 97.5 98.9 1581.2 98.1 99.2 Creek Year1614.7 3 (2011) Profile 10+00 to 97.7 Threemile 98.8 99.0 - Reach99.9 97.7 98.8 1629.1 97.3 99.9 98.3 98.8 1641.2 98.6 99.9 99.1 99.5 1649.5 98.0 99.9 98.9 99.7 1659.8 99.4 100.3 97.8 99.6 1675.3 97.5 100.3 97.7 99.7 1685.0 100.1 100.5 97.9 99.7 1692.6 98.8 100.6 98.9 99.6 1698.5 99.8 100.5 99.9 100.3 1708.9 99.9 100.6 99.7 100.3 1715.9 99.4 100.6 99.3 100.3 1727.8 100.1 100.7 99.9 100.3 1750.8 100.3 100.8 100.1 100.5 1765.1 98.9 101.0 98.6 100.6 1772.9 98.6 100.9 99.4 100.6 1789.9 100.4 100.9 100.2 100.5 1836.8 101.1 101.6 100.7 101.0 1852.5 99.4 101.7 100.7 101.2 1880.1 99.5 101.6 99.5 101.3 1881.9 101.5 101.6 98.9 101.2 1919.4 101.3 102.1 101.4 101.6 1928.0 100.2 102.1 101.3 101.8 1940.1 100.2 102.2 100.1 101.8 1950.3 101.5 102.2 99.9 101.8 1965.2 101.9 102.6 101.2 101.8 1982.4 102.0 102.7 101.8 102.3 1988.8 101.3 102.7 101.0 102.3 2003.9 101.2 102.7 101.3 102.3
1300
1400
1500
Avg. Water Surface Slope Riffle Length Avg. Riffle Slope Pool Length Avg. Pool Slope
As-built 0.0098 51.0 0.0154 46.0 -------
2009 0.0097 52.9 0.0143 38.0 0.0008
Year 1 (2009) Bed
Year 2 (2010) Bed
2011 0.0097 50 0.0173 46 0.0052
20+00
1600
1700
Distance (feet) As-built (2008) Bed
2010 0.0098 51 0.0148 44 0.0038
Year 3 (2011) Bed
Year 3 (2011) Water Surface
1800
1900
2000
Project Name Reach Feature Date Crew
Threemile Creek - Profile 20+00 - 30+00 Profile 5/2/11 Dean, Thomas
Elevation (feet - arbitrary)
2008 As-built Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 0.0 82.5 82.6 37.1 82.8 83.2 93.1 83.4 83.9 98.8 83.2 83.9 107.4 83.2 83.9 121.0 84.1 84.1 130.4 83.4 84.3 138.8 83.4 84.3 144.7 83.7 84.3 197.0 84.7 85.1 226.7 84.1 85.1 236.5 83.3 85.2 250.9 82.1 85.2 253.2 85.2 85.2 281.5 85.4 85.9 325.5 86.0 86.4 346.6 85.2 370.6 85.4 86.4 384.2 85.7 86.3 420.6 86.8 87.0 438.2 86.1 87.2 448.3 86.2 87.2 457.1 86.8 87.2 484.0 87.2 87.6 494.7 86.5 87.6 513.8 85.6 87.6 517.6 87.9 88.2 543.8 87.7 88.3 559.5 87.8 88.3 602.6 88.7 89.1 627.8 88.2 89.1 651.9 87.0 89.0 655.0 89.5 89.6 696.0114 89.7 90.0 713.6 89.0 90.1 741.3 89.0 90.1 754.4 89.6 90.2 112 821.6 91.0 91.2 845.2 90.1 91.2 867.7 88.6 91.3 871.4110 91.4 91.6 893.4 91.4 91.9 932.0 91.5 92.0 943.4 91.0 92.0 955.7108 91.1 92.1 964.5 91.6 92.1 990.6 92.5 92.9 1013.1 92.8 93.1 106 1021.3 92.0 93.1 1039.8 92.0 93.0 1053.0 92.6 93.1 1089.8 93.6 94.1 104 1106.2 93.8 94.3 1116.9 92.3 94.2 1131.8 93.2 94.3 102 1143.9 93.3 94.3 1164.3 94.5 94.9 1245.2 95.7 96.1 1254.5 95.1 96.1 100 1267.9 95.3 96.0 1279.9 2000 95.8 96.1 2100 1315.5 96.3 96.6 1357.4 96.9 97.3 1366.5 96.2 97.3 1379.4 96.4 97.2 1387.8 96.9 97.3
Station 1971.8 1990.1 2014.8 2057.5 2064.9 2077.4 2089.1 2127.9 2148.5 2173.6 2176.6 2212.9 2224.2 2242.6 2263.2 2282.2 2321.8 2345.4 2360.4 2369.9 2401.4 2468.9 2491.5 2502.3 2527.6 2540.7 2593.2 2606.2 2621.5 2634.9 2637.3 2668.4 2684.7 2707.3 2730.4 2735.7 2751.8 2770.9 2806.3 2848.0 2857.8 2872.6 2888.6 2897.5 2904.1 2937.8 2960.9 2971.4 2979.2 2989.8
2009 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 101.2 102.2 102.0 102.2 102.5 102.5 102.4 102.9 101.9 102.9 102.9 102.9 103.0 103.4 103.6 102.8 103.6 101.6 103.6 104.0 104.1 104.1 104.4 103.2 104.5 103.3 104.4 103.7 104.4 103.9 104.5 105.4 105.7 104.8 105.6 105.0 105.7 105.5 105.6 106.4 106.6 107.0 107.5 107.3 107.6 106.6 107.6 106.5 107.6 107.4 107.6 108.1 108.4 107.5 108.4 106.8 108.4 106.6 108.3 108.6 108.7 108.8 109.0 107.6 109.0 108.2 109.0 108.3 109.0 108.6 108.9 109.3 109.5 109.7 109.9 109.7 110.2 110.0 110.4 109.1 110.4 109.4 110.4 109.7 110.4 109.5 110.4 110.3 110.4 110.8 111.0 110.7 111.0 110.3 111.0 110.3 111.0 110.2 111.0
2200
Station 1974.2 1985.1 1996.8 2025.6 2064.2 2074.1 2082.5 2091.6 2136.7 2152.0 2167.6 2174.7 2180.4 2214.4 2225.7 2252.9 2274.0 2284.0 2323.1 2342.6 2364.6 2375.0 2412.6 2449.5 2492.4 2508.4 2532.1 2544.7 2596.1 2610.3 2634.6 2639.7 2653.4 2674.6 2688.4 2707.5 2726.5 2738.2 2791.8 2825.3 2850.1 2864.7 2883.6 2895.4 2904.9 2938.1 2958.6 2975.5 2987.0 2998.6 3040.7
2010 2011 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 101.0 102.3 1966.3 101.3 102.7 101.3 102.3 1981.4 101.2 102.7 102.0 102.3 1998.7 102.2 102.9 102.5 102.9 2019.8 102.4 103.2 102.3 103.0 2041.0 102.1 103.3 102.1 103.0 2044.9 102.6 103.4 102.2 103.0 2058.6 102.6 103.4 102.6 103.0 2069.2 101.8 103.5 103.4 103.7 2087.7 102.9 103.4 102.5 103.7 2128.7 103.6 104.2 102.4 103.7 2144.1 102.7 104.2 101.8 103.7 2164.1 102.0 104.2 104.1 104.3 2176.9 102.0 104.2 104.2 104.7 2177.8 104.1 104.5 103.0 104.7 2205.9 104.5 105.1 103.6 104.7 2219.5 103.3 105.0 103.3 104.7 2243.5 103.2 105.1 104.4 104.8 2262.7 103.3 105.1 105.3 105.7 2288.3 104.6 105.1 104.6 105.8 2322.5 104.9 105.9 104.9 105.8 2340.9 104.1 105.9 105.5 105.8 2350.2 104.3 105.9 106.8 107.0 2380.6 105.7 106.3 107.1 107.4 2399.8 106.0 106.9 107.4 107.8 2413.2 106.6 107.3 106.7 107.8 2438.9 106.9 107.6 106.7 107.8 2473.2 107.3 108.1 107.4 107.9 2493.4 107.4 108.1 Threemile 108.6 106.6 - Reach108.2 Creek Year2510.4 3 (2011) Profile 20+00 to 107.2 108.6 2530.9 106.5 108.2 106.4 108.6 2561.0 107.9 108.3 108.7 108.9 2576.3 107.8 108.6 108.8 109.1 2605.0 108.2 108.8 108.7 109.2 2618.2 106.9 108.9 107.6 109.3 2630.5 106.5 108.9 108.0 109.3 2642.0 106.7 108.8 108.3 109.3 2643.3 108.8 109.1 108.9 109.2 2673.1 108.5 109.5 110.0 110.4 2684.4 107.6 109.5 110.1 110.5 2695.7 107.0 109.6 110.3 110.6 2715.8 107.8 109.6 109.5 110.7 2731.6 108.3 109.6 109.8 110.7 2749.1 109.4 109.9 109.5 110.7 2768.6 109.5 110.3 110.5 110.7 2793.4 110.0 110.6 111.0 111.2 2815.2 109.8 110.7 110.9 111.3 2858.6 110.1 111.0 110.3 111.3 2865.0 109.4 111.0 110.4 111.3 2872.5 109.3 111.0 111.0 111.3 2890.6 109.2 111.0 111.7 112.0 2901.5 109.4 111.0 2914.7 110.5 111.0 2939.0 111.0 111.3 2961.6 111.1 111.7 2971.7 110.3 111.7 2980.1 110.1 111.7 2998.1 110.4 111.7
2300
2400
2500
Avg. Water Surface Slope Riffle Length Avg. Riffle Slope Pool Length Avg. Pool Slope
As-built 0.0098 51.0 0.0154 46.0 -------
2009 0.0097 52.9 0.0143 38.0 0.0008
2010 0.0098 51 0.0148 44 0.0038
30+00
2600
2700
2800
Distance (feet) As-built (2008) Bed
Year 1 (2009) Bed
Year 2 (2010) Bed
2011 0.0097 50 0.0173 46 0.0052
Year 3 Bed (2011)
Year 3 (2011) Water Surface
2900
3000
Elevation (feet - arbitrary)
Project Name Reach Feature Date Crew
Threemile Creek - Profile 30+00 - 36+00 Profile 5/2/11 Dean, Thomas
2008 As-built Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 0.0 82.5 82.6 37.1 82.8 83.2 93.1 83.4 83.9 98.8 83.2 83.9 107.4 83.2 83.9 121.0 84.1 84.1 130.4 83.4 84.3 138.8 83.4 84.3 144.7 83.7 84.3 197.0 84.7 85.1 226.7 84.1 85.1 236.5 83.3 85.2 250.9 82.1 85.2 253.2 85.2 85.2 281.5 85.4 85.9 325.5 86.0 86.4 346.6 85.2 370.6 85.4 86.4 384.2 85.7 86.3 420.6 86.8 87.0 438.2 86.1 87.2 448.3 86.2 87.2 457.1 86.8 87.2 484.0 87.2 87.6 494.7 86.5 87.6 513.8 85.6 87.6 517.6 87.9 88.2 543.8 87.7 88.3 559.5 87.8 88.3 602.6 88.7 89.1 627.8 88.2 89.1 651.9 87.0 89.0 120.0 655.0 89.5 89.6 696.0 89.7 90.0 713.6 89.0 90.1 741.3 89.0 90.1 118.0 754.4 89.6 90.2 821.6 91.0 91.2 845.2 90.1 91.2 867.7 88.6 91.3 871.4 91.4 91.6 116.0 893.4 91.4 91.9 932.0 91.5 92.0 943.4 91.0 92.0 955.7 91.1 92.1 964.5 91.6 92.1 114.0 990.6 92.5 92.9 1013.1 92.8 93.1 1021.3 92.0 93.1 1039.8 92.0 93.0 112.0 1053.0 92.6 93.1 1089.8 93.6 94.1 1106.2 93.8 94.3 1116.9 92.3 94.2 1131.8 93.2 94.3 110.0 1143.9 93.3 94.3 1164.3 94.5 94.9 1245.2 95.7 96.1 1254.5 95.1 96.1 108.0 1267.9 95.3 96.0 1279.9 3000 95.8 96.1 1315.5 96.3 96.6 1357.4 96.9 97.3 1366.5 96.2 97.3 1379.4 96.4 97.2 1387.8 96.9 97.3
Station 2971.4 2979.2 2989.8 2994.6 3040.0 3051.5 3063.4 3068.0 3070.6 3097.3 3104.2 3121.4 3128.2 3154.3 3190.3 3209.2 3229.2 3236.7 3259.2 3277.5 3308.5 3317.1 3329.7 3347.9 3352.9 3398.6 3410.1 3420.2 3428.9 3435.9 3460.3 3491.9 3509.2 3522.2 3528.0
2009 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 110.3 111.0 110.3 111.0 110.2 111.0 110.8 111.1 111.5 111.8 110.8 111.8 110.3 111.8 110.2 111.8 110.2 112.1 111.8 112.1 111.3 112.1 111.4 112.1 111.9 112.1 112.4 112.7 113.2 113.3 111.5 113.3 112.1 113.3 113.1 113.5 113.8 114.1 114.1 114.5 114.6 114.8 114.0 114.8 114.0 114.8 113.0 114.8 115.0 115.1 115.6 115.9 115.6 116.0 115.1 115.9 115.3 116.0 115.6 116.0 116.4 116.6 116.6 116.8 115.7 116.8 115.2 116.8 117.1 117.2
3100
Station 2975.5 2987.0 2998.6 3040.7 3054.6 3066.9 3073.0 3096.2 3105.9 3117.9 3129.4 3186.8 3203.1 3215.0 3231.5 3239.1 3283.3 3312.3 3328.5 3340.0 3349.7 3357.4 3414.4 3423.7 3432.5 3443.0 3467.4 3497.4 3511.6 3523.9 3532.2
2010 2011 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 110.3 111.3 2966.6 110.1 111.7 110.4 111.3 2984.6 110.4 111.7 111.0 111.3 2996.5 111.2 111.7 111.7 112.0 3020.7 111.1 112.2 110.6 112.1 3034.8 111.3 112.3 110.3 112.1 3048.2 110.5 112.3 112.0 112.3 3056.3 110.3 112.3 112.1 112.5 3065.3 110.3 112.3 111.7 112.5 3067.3 112.1 112.3 111.7 112.5 3091.3 112.1 112.8 112.3 112.5 3096.9 111.6 112.8 113.2 113.6 3103.8 111.5 112.8 112.6 113.6 3120.2 111.6 112.8 112.1 113.6 3127.1 112.4 113.1 112.3 113.6 3150.9 112.7 113.2 113.5 113.9 3164.1 112.9 113.6 114.4 114.8 3176.4 113.0 113.8 114.6 115.1 3183.3 112.3 113.8 114.4 115.2 3200.6 111.7 113.9 114.1 115.2 3212.1 111.8 113.9 113.9 115.2 3226.3 112.6 113.9 115.2 115.5 3236.4 113.7 114.1 116.0 116.3 3261.1 113.7 114.6 115.6 116.4 3273.7 112.9 114.7 115.5 116.4 3286.9 113.1 114.7 116.2 116.5 3294.6 114.0 114.8 116.9 117.1 3301.1 114.4 115.3 116.8 117.3 3309.0 113.8 115.4 116.3 117.3 3322.7 113.7 115.4 3 (2011) Profile - Reach 30+00 116.0 Threemile 117.3Creek Year 3342.9 113.6 115.5 117.4 117.6 3356.9 115.3 115.6 3381.4 115.4 116.1 3405.8 115.7 116.6 3410.7 115.4 116.6 3419.0 115.1 116.6 3428.8 115.2 116.5 3446.3 116.1 116.7 3492.6 117.0 117.6 3501.6 116.3 117.7 3512.0 116.0 117.7 3526.4 116.0 117.6 3532.0 117.5 117.9
3200
3300
Avg. Water Surface Slope Riffle Length Avg. Riffle Slope Pool Length Avg. Pool Slope
Year 1 (2009) Bed
Year 2 (2010) Bed
3400
Year 3 (2011) Bed
2009 0.0097 52.9 0.0143 38.0 0.0008
2010 0.0098 51 0.0148 44 0.0038
2011 0.0097 50 0.0173 46 0.0052
to 36+00
Distance (feet) As-built (2008) Bed
As-built 0.0098 51.0 0.0154 46.0 -------
Year 3 (2011) Water Surface
3500
3600
Three Mile Year 3 (2011) Annual Monitoring Structure Photographs taken May 2011 Cross-vane (Photo 1)
J-hook (Photo 2)
Log-Vane (Photo 3)
Cross-vane Station (Photo 4)
Log-vane (Photo 5)
Cross-vane (Photo 6)
Log-vane (Photo 7)
Cross-vane (Photo 8)
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendices
Three Mile Year 3 (2011) Annual Monitoring Structure Photographs taken May 2010 (continued) Cross-vane (Photo 9)
Log-vane (Photo 10)
J-hook (Photo 11)
Cross-vane (Photo 12)
Cross-vane (Photo 13)
Cross-vane (Photo 14)
Cross-vane (Photo 15)
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
J-hook 9 (Photo 16)
Appendices
APPENDIX D HYDROLOGY DATA 2011 Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Annual Monitoring Report Threemile Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendices
Threemile - Groundwater Gauge 1 Year 3 (2011 Data)
20.00 18.00 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 -2.00 -4.00 -6.00 -8.00 -10.00 -12.00 -14.00 -16.00 -18.00 -20.00 -22.00 -24.00 -26.00 -28.00 -30.00
4.00 May 1 Start of Growing Season
October 11 End of Growing Season 3.50
95 days
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
Date
11/10/2011
10/31/2011
10/21/2011
10/11/2011
10/1/2011
9/21/2011
9/11/2011
9/1/2011
8/22/2011
8/12/2011
8/2/2011
7/23/2011
7/13/2011
7/3/2011
6/23/2011
6/13/2011
6/3/2011
5/24/2011
5/14/2011
5/4/2011
4/24/2011
4/14/2011
4/4/2011
3/25/2011
0.00
Precipitation (inches)
Water Level (inches)
3.00
Date 11/10/2011
10/31/2011
10/21/2011
10/11/2011
10/1/2011
9/21/2011
9/11/2011
9/1/2011
147 days
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Precipitation (inches)
May 1 Start of Growing Season
8/22/2011
8/12/2011
8/2/2011
7/23/2011
7/13/2011
7/3/2011
6/23/2011
6/13/2011
6/3/2011
5/24/2011
5/14/2011
20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 5/4/2011
4/24/2011
4/14/2011
4/4/2011
3/25/2011
Water Level (inches)
Threemile - Groundwater Gauge 2 Year 3 (2011 Data)
4.00
October 11 End of Growing Season 3.50
3.00
Date 11/10/2011
10/31/2011
10/21/2011
10/11/2011
10/1/2011
9/21/2011
9/11/2011
9/1/2011
101 days
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Precipitation (inches)
May 1 Start of Growing Season
8/22/2011
8/12/2011
8/2/2011
7/23/2011
7/13/2011
7/3/2011
6/23/2011
6/13/2011
6/3/2011
5/24/2011
5/14/2011
20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 5/4/2011
4/24/2011
4/14/2011
4/4/2011
3/25/2011
Water Level (inches)
Threemile - Groundwater Gauge 3 Year 3 (2011 Data)
October 11 End of Growing Season 4.00
3.50
3.00
Date 11/10/2011
10/31/2011
10/21/2011
10/11/2011
10/1/2011
9/21/2011
9/11/2011
9/1/2011
October 11 End of Growing Season
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Precipitation (inches)
32 days
8/22/2011
8/12/2011
8/2/2011
7/23/2011
7/13/2011
7/3/2011
6/23/2011
6/13/2011
6/3/2011
5/24/2011
5/14/2011
20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 5/4/2011
4/24/2011
4/14/2011
4/4/2011
3/25/2011
Water Level (inches)
Threemile - Groundwater Reference Gauge Year 3 (2011 Data)
May 1 Start of Growing Season 4.00
3.50
3.00