Agents VARs

Report 6 Downloads 62 Views
Trends in Partnering: Telecom Agents and IT Channel Firms Carolyn April Director, Industry Analysis CompTIA [email protected]

Khali Henderson Editor in Chief Channel Partners [email protected]

Today’s Agenda

• CompTIA-Channel Partners Agent-VAR Partnering Survey Results • Panel Discussion Featuring Representatives from Both Sides of the Aisle

First off…

Who’s in the Room Today? • VARs, Solution providers, MSPs and other IT channel firms • Telecom agents (master, sub or independent) • Vendors • Distributors • Wedding crashers • Other

Breaking it Down: Components of Global Tech Sector

Telecom Services $1.5 trillion

46%

54%

IT Hardware, Software & Services $1.7 trillion

The ongoing convergence of the “traditional” IT and telecom services sectors will bring new opportunities for partnering, but also challenges for those ill-prepared. Source: IDC

Agent-VAR Partnering Study 1. Status of Agent-VAR Partnerships 2. Success Drivers & Areas of Improvement 3. Future Partnership Outlook

Research Methodology 

Goal: to understand current/future partnerships between telecom agents and IT solution providers.



Reprised 2011 survey with additional questions prompted during two workshops in 2011.

 Data collected in two separate online surveys in January 2012  Agent respondents: 60% independent/subs and 40% master agents.



VAR respondents: 33% solutions providers, 31% retailers, 22% MSPs and 8% systems integrators.

Status of Agent VAR Partnerships Number of Partnerships Between Agents and VARs Multiple partners of equal relevance

15% 16% 32% 33% 29% 28%

One partner, other secondary partners

One partner

None

46% 50%

10% 10%

7%

PBX Dealers IT VARs

Master Agents 28% 26%

Agents/Subagents

13% 28% 30% Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

Status of Agent VAR Partnerships 18% 18%

Informally swap leads for services, with no reciprocal pay or agreements Formally swap leads under an agreement VAR pays a referral fee to agent for closed leads under a referral agreement

5% 9% 5% 24%

43%

Agent pays recurring commission to VAR under subagent agreement Agent pays referral fee to VAR for closed leads under a referral agreement VAR gives agent a cut of total deal sold to agent’s customer

Agents VARs

17% 10% 7% 3% 6%

Other minor mentions include: selling and marketing under a formal agreement.

Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

Status of Agent VAR Partnerships Percentage of Revenue from Agent-VAR Partnerships in the Last 12 Months 100%

75%-99%

50%-74%

0% 5%

VARs

13% 43% 25% 25%

25%-49%

Less than 25%

Agents

10% 12%

52% 14% Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

Status of Agent VAR Partnerships How Partnership Revenue Is Expected to Change in the Next 12 Months 24%

Increase Significantly

17% 52%

Increase Somewhat

45% 18%

Stay the Same Decrease Somewhat Decrease Significantly

32% 3% 3%

Agents VARs

2% 1% Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

Status of Agent VAR Partnerships Factors Influencing Decisions to Partner

Top Factors

VAR Ranking as Major Factor

Agents Ranking as Major Factor

Partner’s reputation

61%

84%

Partner’s technical support/skills

60%

52%

Partner’s understanding of my business model

54%

43%

Partner’s financial health

51%

49%

Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

Success Factors & Improvement Areas Factors Influencing Success of Partnerships Rank

VARs

Agents

1

Leads provided by partner (54%)

Effective communication (71%)

2

Emerging technologies and business models (53%)

Leads provided by partner (47%)

3

Effective communication (51%)

Partners’ understanding of my business model (42%)

4

Marketing support provided by partner (48%)

Emerging technologies and business models (39%)

Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

Success Factors & Improvement Areas Top Priorities for Partnerships

Priority

VARs

Agents

1

Setting sales strategy (42%)

Establishing and protecting account ownership (52%)

2

Setting sales revenue goals and commitments (29%)

Establishing rules for interfacing with customers (49%)

3

(TIE)Establishing and protecting account ownership, establishing rules for interfacing with customers, and establishing project management rules (28%)

Setting sales strategy (42%)

Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

Future Partnership Outlook Agent-VAR Intentions to Partner in the Next 12 Months 76%

Plan to add new partners

26%

Plan to increase business with existing partners Plan to maintain status quo Plan to reduce business with existing partners Plan to drop some partners Don't know

84% 55% 4% 51% 1% 11% 15%

Agents

4%

VARs

1% 11%

Source: Channel Partners and CompTIA Agent-VAR Partnering Survey, January 2012

For More Information… Download the report:

Partnering Trends Between Telecom and IT Channels ‒ 2012 www.comptia.org/members www.channelpartnersonline.com/resource-center

Introducing Today’s Panel • Clark Atwood, Principal and President, Concierge Communications • Sally Coon, Vice President of Operations, TeamLogic IT • Joe Schurman, Founder and CEO, Evangelyze Communications • Marko Spremo, Vice President, Sales and Marketing, Telapprise, LLC

Contact Carolyn April Director, Industry Analysis CompTIA [email protected]

Khali Henderson Editor-in-Chief Channel Partners [email protected]

Scan for session points: • Use your myBreakaway login at comptia.boothtag.com or sign-up for a BoothTag account • Download the tag reader from the BoothTag site