APS Presentation - Arlingtonva
OCTOBER 15, 2014
ABINGDONv ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PFRC MEETING #1
Agenda PFRC Chair • Introduction • PFRC Charge and Process • Principles of Civic Design in Arlington Arlington Public Schools • Introductions • Architectural Overview • Transportation Overview Arlington County • Use Permit Process • Zoning Ordinance Parking Requirements Public Comment Next Steps
PFRC CHAIR: • Introduction • Charge & Process • Principles of Civic Design in Arlington
3
PRINCPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - CIVIC VALUES: • Respect neighborhood context and important historic structures. 01 • Take advantage of prominent sites and major civic programs to create bold • • • • •
architecture. Emphasize leadership in energy conservation and environmental sustainability through architectural design, materials, and construction methods. Utilize universal design to ensure open and welcoming accessibility for all citizens. Explore adaptive reuse of significant existing structures and building elements and consider future reuse of new buildings. Optimize open space for public relaxation and recreation, and minimize building footprint and areas used for parking, on-site roads, and service drives. Support joint development and use of school and county facilities when in the best interest of both entities.
PRINCIPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - SITING + ORIENTATION: • Orient the primary building entrance to the appropriate adjacent street or public 01 space so movement and entrance to buildings are natural and intuitive. • • •
Emphasize pedestrians, bicycles, and mass transit over automobiles in building placement, entry, and architecture. Ensure building and site are functionally and spatially coherent, facilitating flow of people to, from, and within the site Create “positive” outdoor spaces with pedestrian emphasis.
Winter rise
PRINCIPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - BUILDING FORM:
01• • •
Develop massing strategies appropriately scaled to the site and neighborhood. Use massing to emphasize pedestrian, human scale to the building, breaking into smaller sub-parts that respond to site and program. Develop a sense of hierarchy in the massing, emphasizing and leading to the important functions and spaces in the building, including the entrance.
PRINCIPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - DETAILS & MATERIALS:
01• • • • • •
Use design details related to pedestrian scale and provide interest, discovery, and character. Celebrate the civic nature of the project with public art and iconic architectural elements. Use durable and permanent materials to assure longevity of and civic pride in, the project. Appropriately plan budgets to reduce negative design impact of value engineering. Explore consistent design elements with other successful Arlington civic projects. Design building lobbies to create a sense of place and importance.
ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: • • • • • • • • 8
Project Overview Schedule Visioning Recap Site Analysis Site Explorations Sustainability Overview Archeological Summary Transportation Summary
PROJECT OVERVIEW 9
John Chadwick – Assistant Superintendent , Facilities & Operations Scott Prisco – Director of Design & Construction Aji Robinson – Project Manager Joanne Uyeda – Principal, Abingdon ES Construction Manager - TBD 10 ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Paul Lund
Scott Walters 11 DESIGN TEAM
Peter Winebrenner
Lisa Ferretto
Maureen Wiechert
Julie Higgins
Om Khurjekar
PK-12 Enrollment Growth
September 30, 2012:
22,613
September 30, 2013:
23,316
• 703/3.1% more than 2012
September 30, 2014:
24,529
• 1,213/5.2% more than 2013
2009 thru 2013:
12 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
19% increase
• Projected 2018/2019
NW -85 Legend QUADRANT
NE NW SE SW
• Projected 2023/2024
NE -218
SW -361
NW -231 SE -290
Legend QUADRANT
NE -455
SW -394
SE -371
NE NW SE SW
Notes: 1. Seat deficit equals Building Capacity in each quadrant, excluding relocatables, minus projected enrollment. 2. Peer models and dual enrolled students not included (54 students at Reed). 3. Includes planned capacity at New Elementary, ATS, McKinley, Ashlawn and Abingdon. 13 Seat Deficits : OVERVIEW Elementary School Seat Deficits
More Seats For Students 2012-2013 CIP: Addition/Renovation at Ashlawn ES New ES on Williamsburg Campus Additions/Renovations at McKinley ES Additions/Renovations at Arlington Traditional School New ES on Kenmore/Carlin Springs Campus
2014-2015 CIP: Washington Lee Renovations Additions/Renovations at Abingdon ES New Elementary Seats, South Arlington (New ES at Jefferson Preferred) 1,300 New Secondary Seats (Location or Locations to be determined) New Secondary Seats at the Career Center
14 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
2014 2015 2016 2017 2017
2016 2017 2018 2019 2022
Abingdon Elementary School
Addition / Renovation 136 additional seats: 589 – current capacity 725 – projected capacity Occupancy – September 2017 Estimated Project Cost - $28.75M
15 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Approved 2015-2024 CIP: Abingdon Elementary School
16 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Preliminary Total Project Cost Estimate
Hard Costs
$20,700,000
Escalation
$ 2,300,000
Soft Costs
$ 5,000,000
Project Costs
$28,000,000
Possible Community Amenities
$ 750,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$28,750,000
17 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Stakeholder Process
Ed Specs
BLPC
PFRC
APS •Program
Community •Site
County •Location of additions
•Educational vision
•Community concerns / use
•Transportation / traffic
•Pedagogy
•Design input
•Impact on neighborhood
•Character of spaces
•School pros & cons
•Architectural character
•Educational pros & cons
•Circulation
•Massing
•Opportunities
•Architectural character
•Community vision
•21st century learning
•Massing
•Environmental concerns
•Agility / adaptability
•Parking
•Parking
18 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SCHEDULE 19
PROJECT MILESTONES: • • • • •
Concept Design Submission to APS Board - Information – Feb 5, 2015 Concept Design Submission to APS Board - Approval – Feb 19, 2019 Schematic Design – April 15, 2015 Design Development – July 15, 2015 Use Permit – September 2015
20 OVERALL PROJECT SCHEDULE
• • • • •
Construction Documents – December 2015 Building Permit – February 2016 Bidding – March 2016 Construction – April 2016 Occupancy – September 2017
October
September
BLPC
16
November 28
30
PFRC
15
APS BD
14
PTA/Comm
19
*
January
February
2
6
3
16
17
20
21
March
17
3
18
5
19
30
8
Site Review
18
December
*Joint School and County Board project kickoff meeting
Program Review Concept Design Schematic Design 21 BLPC & PFRC SCHEDULE
17
18
Upcoming PFRC & COMMUNITY Meetings: •
October 15th
PFRC Meeting
•
October 30th
Community Meeting
•
November 19th
PFRC Meeting
•
December 17th
PFRC Meeting
•
January 21st
PFRC Meeting
•
February 18th
PFRC Meeting
•
March 18th
PFRC Meeting
•
April 15th
PFRC Meeting
•
April TBD
Community Gallery Walk
•
May 20th
PFRC Meeting
•
One PFRC meeting in July and one in October / November
•
Pre Construction Community meeting
22 PFRC SCHEDULE
22
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
VISIONING 23
GREATEST HOPES
What are your GREATEST HOPES for… … this project … Abingdon Elementary School … the community 24 VISIONING
GREATEST HOPES
DESIGN / AESTHETICS: Consider building site / massing / height Incorporate historic architectural elements & connect to Fairlington architecture Improved sense of arrival Looks like an elementary school - Age appropriate & Kid-friendly Student Involvement – “Green Team”
25
SITE / COMMUNITY: Community connections - Use by Arlington community / host community events Better site and building access Safe walking paths to school / multi-modal transportation Improved / increased parking Leave green space & Demonstration garden / AFAC Outdoor learning spaces / outdoor classroom / Outdoor patio
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SITE ANALYSIS 26
Analysis: School District Boundary
27
Context: Bus Routes
28
Context: Bike Routes
29
Site Analysis: Property Line and Setbacks
30
Site Analysis: Vehicular Access
31
Site Analysis: Parking Analysis – Per Zoning EXISTING CONDITIONS: Current Enrollment – 589* Elem. School – 1 space per 7.5 Students Requires 79 spaces Visitor Parking – 1 space per 40 Requires 15 spaces Total Required – 94 spaces Total currently on site – 80* PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Future Enrollment – 725 Elem. School – 1 space per 7.5 Students Requires 97 spaces Visitor Parking – 1 space per 40 Requires 19 spaces Total Required – 116 spaces
32
Site Analysis: Pedestrian Access / On Site Circulation
33
Site Analysis: Existing Building Entrances
34
Site Analysis: Existing Topography / Slopes / Existing Drains
35
Site Analysis: Existing Vegetation
36
Site Analysis: Existing Open Spaces-Active V/S Passive
37
Site Analysis: All Existing Conditions
38
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SITE INVESTIGATIONS 39
SITE INVESIGATION
5 x 3000 sf
6 x 2000 sf
Parking 8 = 80
Soccer Field 1
Bus 6 40
Playground 2
GROUP SITE OPTIONS
41
SITE OPTION – Group 1 (option a)
42
SITE OPTION – Group 1 (option b)
43
SITE OPTION – Group 2 (option a)
44
SITE OPTION – Group 2 (option b)
45
SITE OPTION – Group 3
46
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SUATAINABILITY OVERVIEW
47
48 SUSTAINABILITY | Strategies
49 SUSTAINABILITY | Site
? WATER
SOURCE
USE
TREATMENT
REUSE
OUTFLOW
Water = Water? Water = Potable + Rain + Gray + Waste
RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM
50 SUSTAINABILITY | Water
OUTDOOR CLASSROOM
McKINLEY
ENERGY Rethink Reduce Reuse Recycle Renew
?
51 SUSTAINABILITY | Energy
Existing National Average Education 77
APS Existing McKinley (2011) 75
Existing National Average ES 73
CEP 2030 Goal (25% < 2007) 69
APS Existing ES Average (2011)
•
2011 Energy Star
•
Already exceeds APS Goal by 15%
•
Minimum Goal
59
APS 2017 Goal ES (15% < 2011)
•
48
APS Existing Abingdon (2011)
•
41
Energy Star Score of 75
35
HCM New WCPS MS 33
HCM New MCPS ES 30
HCM New BCPS ES
29
HCM New PGCPS ES 23
APS New Net Zero ES 18
Richardsville Net Zero ES 0
10
20
30
40
Energy Use Intensity (EUI)
50
60
70
80
90
15% Reduction?
Net Zero Goal •
39
CEP 2050 Goal (60% < 2007)
52 SUSTAINABILITY | Energy
ENERGY Abingdon Goal
83
60% Reduction
Arlington County • AIRE, Arlington Initiative to Rethink Energy • ACE, Arlingtonians for a Clean Environment • Community Energy Plan APS • Green Scene • AFAC, Arlington Food Assistance Center • Energy Report Cards • Energy Goal: 15% < 2011 Abingdon ES • Energy Star Certified • Specialty Wheel classes • CETA, Changing Education through the Arts • Project GIFT, Guiding Instruction through Fine Arts and Technology
53 SUSTAINABILITY | people
Learning Opportunities
54 SUSTAINABILITY | People
PEOPLE Abingdon Mission “To provide a safe, academically challenging environment that engages all students through wellplanned and executed teaching strategies, develops positive social skills and fosters productive, selfreliant citizens for the Abingdon community and beyond.”
55 SUSTAINABILITY | People
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
ARCHEOLOGICAL SUMMARY
56
ARCHEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW: Ottery Group • On-site investigation (Educational opportunity for students) • Met with Arlington County Preservation Planner – Rebeccah Ballo • Shovel tests in area near Fort Reynolds • Additional Shovel test down slope north of school • Initial findings • Substantial cut-and-fill on site from original school construction • No evidence of cultural resources relating to Civil War or other pre-WWII contexts • Full report forthcoming
57
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW
58
Multi-Modal Transportation Study: Toole Design Group Toole Design Group in on board and will begin Multi-Modal Transportation Study efforts shortly: • • • • • • • •
59
Assembling a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Team Outreach And Surveys Collect Data ‐ Transportation Counts And Observations Assess Existing Conditions – Motorized And Non‐Motorized Presentation Of Baseline Conditions Input And Coordination With Design Team Develop School Transportation Report For Abingdon Elementary Renovation/Expansion
ARLINGTON COUNTY: • Use Permit Process • Zoning Ordinance & Parking Requirements
60
Thank You 61
ABINGDONv ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PFRC MEETING #1
Agenda PFRC Chair • Introduction • PFRC Charge and Process • Principles of Civic Design in Arlington Arlington Public Schools • Introductions • Architectural Overview • Transportation Overview Arlington County • Use Permit Process • Zoning Ordinance Parking Requirements Public Comment Next Steps
PFRC CHAIR: • Introduction • Charge & Process • Principles of Civic Design in Arlington
3
PRINCPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - CIVIC VALUES: • Respect neighborhood context and important historic structures. 01 • Take advantage of prominent sites and major civic programs to create bold • • • • •
architecture. Emphasize leadership in energy conservation and environmental sustainability through architectural design, materials, and construction methods. Utilize universal design to ensure open and welcoming accessibility for all citizens. Explore adaptive reuse of significant existing structures and building elements and consider future reuse of new buildings. Optimize open space for public relaxation and recreation, and minimize building footprint and areas used for parking, on-site roads, and service drives. Support joint development and use of school and county facilities when in the best interest of both entities.
PRINCIPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - SITING + ORIENTATION: • Orient the primary building entrance to the appropriate adjacent street or public 01 space so movement and entrance to buildings are natural and intuitive. • • •
Emphasize pedestrians, bicycles, and mass transit over automobiles in building placement, entry, and architecture. Ensure building and site are functionally and spatially coherent, facilitating flow of people to, from, and within the site Create “positive” outdoor spaces with pedestrian emphasis.
Winter rise
PRINCIPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - BUILDING FORM:
01• • •
Develop massing strategies appropriately scaled to the site and neighborhood. Use massing to emphasize pedestrian, human scale to the building, breaking into smaller sub-parts that respond to site and program. Develop a sense of hierarchy in the massing, emphasizing and leading to the important functions and spaces in the building, including the entrance.
PRINCIPLES OF CIVIC DESIGN - DETAILS & MATERIALS:
01• • • • • •
Use design details related to pedestrian scale and provide interest, discovery, and character. Celebrate the civic nature of the project with public art and iconic architectural elements. Use durable and permanent materials to assure longevity of and civic pride in, the project. Appropriately plan budgets to reduce negative design impact of value engineering. Explore consistent design elements with other successful Arlington civic projects. Design building lobbies to create a sense of place and importance.
ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: • • • • • • • • 8
Project Overview Schedule Visioning Recap Site Analysis Site Explorations Sustainability Overview Archeological Summary Transportation Summary
PROJECT OVERVIEW 9
John Chadwick – Assistant Superintendent , Facilities & Operations Scott Prisco – Director of Design & Construction Aji Robinson – Project Manager Joanne Uyeda – Principal, Abingdon ES Construction Manager - TBD 10 ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Paul Lund
Scott Walters 11 DESIGN TEAM
Peter Winebrenner
Lisa Ferretto
Maureen Wiechert
Julie Higgins
Om Khurjekar
PK-12 Enrollment Growth
September 30, 2012:
22,613
September 30, 2013:
23,316
• 703/3.1% more than 2012
September 30, 2014:
24,529
• 1,213/5.2% more than 2013
2009 thru 2013:
12 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
19% increase
• Projected 2018/2019
NW -85 Legend QUADRANT
NE NW SE SW
• Projected 2023/2024
NE -218
SW -361
NW -231 SE -290
Legend QUADRANT
NE -455
SW -394
SE -371
NE NW SE SW
Notes: 1. Seat deficit equals Building Capacity in each quadrant, excluding relocatables, minus projected enrollment. 2. Peer models and dual enrolled students not included (54 students at Reed). 3. Includes planned capacity at New Elementary, ATS, McKinley, Ashlawn and Abingdon. 13 Seat Deficits : OVERVIEW Elementary School Seat Deficits
More Seats For Students 2012-2013 CIP: Addition/Renovation at Ashlawn ES New ES on Williamsburg Campus Additions/Renovations at McKinley ES Additions/Renovations at Arlington Traditional School New ES on Kenmore/Carlin Springs Campus
2014-2015 CIP: Washington Lee Renovations Additions/Renovations at Abingdon ES New Elementary Seats, South Arlington (New ES at Jefferson Preferred) 1,300 New Secondary Seats (Location or Locations to be determined) New Secondary Seats at the Career Center
14 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
2014 2015 2016 2017 2017
2016 2017 2018 2019 2022
Abingdon Elementary School
Addition / Renovation 136 additional seats: 589 – current capacity 725 – projected capacity Occupancy – September 2017 Estimated Project Cost - $28.75M
15 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Approved 2015-2024 CIP: Abingdon Elementary School
16 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Preliminary Total Project Cost Estimate
Hard Costs
$20,700,000
Escalation
$ 2,300,000
Soft Costs
$ 5,000,000
Project Costs
$28,000,000
Possible Community Amenities
$ 750,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$28,750,000
17 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Stakeholder Process
Ed Specs
BLPC
PFRC
APS •Program
Community •Site
County •Location of additions
•Educational vision
•Community concerns / use
•Transportation / traffic
•Pedagogy
•Design input
•Impact on neighborhood
•Character of spaces
•School pros & cons
•Architectural character
•Educational pros & cons
•Circulation
•Massing
•Opportunities
•Architectural character
•Community vision
•21st century learning
•Massing
•Environmental concerns
•Agility / adaptability
•Parking
•Parking
18 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SCHEDULE 19
PROJECT MILESTONES: • • • • •
Concept Design Submission to APS Board - Information – Feb 5, 2015 Concept Design Submission to APS Board - Approval – Feb 19, 2019 Schematic Design – April 15, 2015 Design Development – July 15, 2015 Use Permit – September 2015
20 OVERALL PROJECT SCHEDULE
• • • • •
Construction Documents – December 2015 Building Permit – February 2016 Bidding – March 2016 Construction – April 2016 Occupancy – September 2017
October
September
BLPC
16
November 28
30
PFRC
15
APS BD
14
PTA/Comm
19
*
January
February
2
6
3
16
17
20
21
March
17
3
18
5
19
30
8
Site Review
18
December
*Joint School and County Board project kickoff meeting
Program Review Concept Design Schematic Design 21 BLPC & PFRC SCHEDULE
17
18
Upcoming PFRC & COMMUNITY Meetings: •
October 15th
PFRC Meeting
•
October 30th
Community Meeting
•
November 19th
PFRC Meeting
•
December 17th
PFRC Meeting
•
January 21st
PFRC Meeting
•
February 18th
PFRC Meeting
•
March 18th
PFRC Meeting
•
April 15th
PFRC Meeting
•
April TBD
Community Gallery Walk
•
May 20th
PFRC Meeting
•
One PFRC meeting in July and one in October / November
•
Pre Construction Community meeting
22 PFRC SCHEDULE
22
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
VISIONING 23
GREATEST HOPES
What are your GREATEST HOPES for… … this project … Abingdon Elementary School … the community 24 VISIONING
GREATEST HOPES
DESIGN / AESTHETICS: Consider building site / massing / height Incorporate historic architectural elements & connect to Fairlington architecture Improved sense of arrival Looks like an elementary school - Age appropriate & Kid-friendly Student Involvement – “Green Team”
25
SITE / COMMUNITY: Community connections - Use by Arlington community / host community events Better site and building access Safe walking paths to school / multi-modal transportation Improved / increased parking Leave green space & Demonstration garden / AFAC Outdoor learning spaces / outdoor classroom / Outdoor patio
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SITE ANALYSIS 26
Analysis: School District Boundary
27
Context: Bus Routes
28
Context: Bike Routes
29
Site Analysis: Property Line and Setbacks
30
Site Analysis: Vehicular Access
31
Site Analysis: Parking Analysis – Per Zoning EXISTING CONDITIONS: Current Enrollment – 589* Elem. School – 1 space per 7.5 Students Requires 79 spaces Visitor Parking – 1 space per 40 Requires 15 spaces Total Required – 94 spaces Total currently on site – 80* PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Future Enrollment – 725 Elem. School – 1 space per 7.5 Students Requires 97 spaces Visitor Parking – 1 space per 40 Requires 19 spaces Total Required – 116 spaces
32
Site Analysis: Pedestrian Access / On Site Circulation
33
Site Analysis: Existing Building Entrances
34
Site Analysis: Existing Topography / Slopes / Existing Drains
35
Site Analysis: Existing Vegetation
36
Site Analysis: Existing Open Spaces-Active V/S Passive
37
Site Analysis: All Existing Conditions
38
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SITE INVESTIGATIONS 39
SITE INVESIGATION
5 x 3000 sf
6 x 2000 sf
Parking 8 = 80
Soccer Field 1
Bus 6 40
Playground 2
GROUP SITE OPTIONS
41
SITE OPTION – Group 1 (option a)
42
SITE OPTION – Group 1 (option b)
43
SITE OPTION – Group 2 (option a)
44
SITE OPTION – Group 2 (option b)
45
SITE OPTION – Group 3
46
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
SUATAINABILITY OVERVIEW
47
48 SUSTAINABILITY | Strategies
49 SUSTAINABILITY | Site
? WATER
SOURCE
USE
TREATMENT
REUSE
OUTFLOW
Water = Water? Water = Potable + Rain + Gray + Waste
RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM
50 SUSTAINABILITY | Water
OUTDOOR CLASSROOM
McKINLEY
ENERGY Rethink Reduce Reuse Recycle Renew
?
51 SUSTAINABILITY | Energy
Existing National Average Education 77
APS Existing McKinley (2011) 75
Existing National Average ES 73
CEP 2030 Goal (25% < 2007) 69
APS Existing ES Average (2011)
•
2011 Energy Star
•
Already exceeds APS Goal by 15%
•
Minimum Goal
59
APS 2017 Goal ES (15% < 2011)
•
48
APS Existing Abingdon (2011)
•
41
Energy Star Score of 75
35
HCM New WCPS MS 33
HCM New MCPS ES 30
HCM New BCPS ES
29
HCM New PGCPS ES 23
APS New Net Zero ES 18
Richardsville Net Zero ES 0
10
20
30
40
Energy Use Intensity (EUI)
50
60
70
80
90
15% Reduction?
Net Zero Goal •
39
CEP 2050 Goal (60% < 2007)
52 SUSTAINABILITY | Energy
ENERGY Abingdon Goal
83
60% Reduction
Arlington County • AIRE, Arlington Initiative to Rethink Energy • ACE, Arlingtonians for a Clean Environment • Community Energy Plan APS • Green Scene • AFAC, Arlington Food Assistance Center • Energy Report Cards • Energy Goal: 15% < 2011 Abingdon ES • Energy Star Certified • Specialty Wheel classes • CETA, Changing Education through the Arts • Project GIFT, Guiding Instruction through Fine Arts and Technology
53 SUSTAINABILITY | people
Learning Opportunities
54 SUSTAINABILITY | People
PEOPLE Abingdon Mission “To provide a safe, academically challenging environment that engages all students through wellplanned and executed teaching strategies, develops positive social skills and fosters productive, selfreliant citizens for the Abingdon community and beyond.”
55 SUSTAINABILITY | People
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
ARCHEOLOGICAL SUMMARY
56
ARCHEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW: Ottery Group • On-site investigation (Educational opportunity for students) • Met with Arlington County Preservation Planner – Rebeccah Ballo • Shovel tests in area near Fort Reynolds • Additional Shovel test down slope north of school • Initial findings • Substantial cut-and-fill on site from original school construction • No evidence of cultural resources relating to Civil War or other pre-WWII contexts • Full report forthcoming
57
Hord Coplan Macht’s Baltimore Location
TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW
58
Multi-Modal Transportation Study: Toole Design Group Toole Design Group in on board and will begin Multi-Modal Transportation Study efforts shortly: • • • • • • • •
59
Assembling a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Team Outreach And Surveys Collect Data ‐ Transportation Counts And Observations Assess Existing Conditions – Motorized And Non‐Motorized Presentation Of Baseline Conditions Input And Coordination With Design Team Develop School Transportation Report For Abingdon Elementary Renovation/Expansion
ARLINGTON COUNTY: • Use Permit Process • Zoning Ordinance & Parking Requirements
60
Thank You 61
