ASCA 2015 Case Study Competition
For optimal participation, please attend the orientation in Banyan/Citrus at 7:45am on Thursday February 4. If you are unable to attend, please review this information and send an e-mail that you wish to participate by 8:15am on Thursday, February 4 to: Colin Chadwick – [email protected]
Please include if you already have a team or not in the email
ASCA 2016 Case Study Competition Orientation Thursday, February 4, 2016 Presented by: Colin Chadwick, Kennesaw State University
Case Study Competition Sponsored by the Raymond H. Goldstone Foundation
Agenda • • • • • •
Case Study Types Case Study Guidelines Format Judges/Judging Criteria Housekeeping Items Partner Process and Registration
Case Study Types • Case Study Types – Graduate/New Professional & Mid-Level • Eligibility: • Graduate and New Professional • Enrolled in Masters Program for 2016 Semester • Employed in Student Conduct for ≤ 2 years
• Mid-Level • Employed in Student Conduct for > 5 years, but < 8 years
Case Study Guidelines • Prepare Response as a Team • Do it on your own – You’ve got this! • No consulting other professionals • Can utilize outside sources, articles, URLs • Use this Code of Student Conduct when appropriate •
Kennesaw State University Student Code of Conduct
• Be creative! • No use of PowerPoint, Presio, Prezi, or other electronic modes • Think “Best Elevator Pitch”
• Teams of 2 or 3 – Don’t want anyone to be left out!
Format • Presentation order will be assigned randomly via e-mail. • Expect e-mail from Colin directly after this presentation.
• 7 minutes – Present Case Study Response to Judges • 5 minutes – Judges Ask You Questions • Each Team can watch the other teams present AFTER you have presented. • No questions for other teams please.
• Each Room Will Have a Moderator. • Moderator Role – Bring you in, introduce you to judges, time keeper for presentation and questioning
Judges & Judging Criteria • Amanda Mesirow: Moraine Valley Community College • Kate Dicato: UNC Chapel Hill • Tynika Williams: DrexelUniversity • Gary Dickstein: Wright State University • Sandra Rouse: Newberry College • Jeffery Stefancic: Purdue University
• Judges will be paying attention to: • Innovation & Approach • Organization of Presentation & Thoughts
• Valid and Rational Approach and
Responses – Is it practical? Does it make sense?
Housekeeping Items • • • •
Partner Up! Case Study Competition Tips Packet Case Study Handout Questions: Contact Colin • [email protected]
• Winners will be announced at Closing Banquet. • Good Luck, Thanks For Your Participation!
Please include if you already have a team or not in the email
ASCA 2016 Case Study Competition Orientation Thursday, February 4, 2016 Presented by: Colin Chadwick, Kennesaw State University
Case Study Competition Sponsored by the Raymond H. Goldstone Foundation
Agenda • • • • • •
Case Study Types Case Study Guidelines Format Judges/Judging Criteria Housekeeping Items Partner Process and Registration
Case Study Types • Case Study Types – Graduate/New Professional & Mid-Level • Eligibility: • Graduate and New Professional • Enrolled in Masters Program for 2016 Semester • Employed in Student Conduct for ≤ 2 years
• Mid-Level • Employed in Student Conduct for > 5 years, but < 8 years
Case Study Guidelines • Prepare Response as a Team • Do it on your own – You’ve got this! • No consulting other professionals • Can utilize outside sources, articles, URLs • Use this Code of Student Conduct when appropriate •
Kennesaw State University Student Code of Conduct
• Be creative! • No use of PowerPoint, Presio, Prezi, or other electronic modes • Think “Best Elevator Pitch”
• Teams of 2 or 3 – Don’t want anyone to be left out!
Format • Presentation order will be assigned randomly via e-mail. • Expect e-mail from Colin directly after this presentation.
• 7 minutes – Present Case Study Response to Judges • 5 minutes – Judges Ask You Questions • Each Team can watch the other teams present AFTER you have presented. • No questions for other teams please.
• Each Room Will Have a Moderator. • Moderator Role – Bring you in, introduce you to judges, time keeper for presentation and questioning
Judges & Judging Criteria • Amanda Mesirow: Moraine Valley Community College • Kate Dicato: UNC Chapel Hill • Tynika Williams: DrexelUniversity • Gary Dickstein: Wright State University • Sandra Rouse: Newberry College • Jeffery Stefancic: Purdue University
• Judges will be paying attention to: • Innovation & Approach • Organization of Presentation & Thoughts
• Valid and Rational Approach and
Responses – Is it practical? Does it make sense?
Housekeeping Items • • • •
Partner Up! Case Study Competition Tips Packet Case Study Handout Questions: Contact Colin • [email protected]
• Winners will be announced at Closing Banquet. • Good Luck, Thanks For Your Participation!
