Biodegradation of naphthalene using Pseudomonas putida (ATCC ...

Report 4 Downloads 21 Views
Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen

The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty.

ABSTRACT

BIODEGRADATION OF NAPHTHALENE USING PSEUDOMONAS putida (ATCC 17484) IN BATCH AND CHEMOSTAT REACTORS by Jay Boyd Best

Kinetic experiments were conducted using Pseudomonas putida (ATCC 17484) to determine the rate of growth when naphthalene was provided as a sole carbon source in suspended biomass systems. Batch and chemostat reactors were used under three sets of conditions: non-aerated, aerated at 29.5° C, and aerated at 25.5° C. A number of concentrations were tested under each set of conditions. Data regression was used to determine parameters for Monod (non-inhibitory), Andrews (inhibitory), and zero-order kinetics. Although the Andrews fit of the data provided a slightly lower sum-of-squares error (SSE), the amount of data scatter and the weak inhibition made the Andrews fit only marginally better. In addition, extremely small values of the saturation constant (Ks < 0.01mg/L) made the use of a zero-order kinetic constant nearly identical with a Monod model for naphthalene concentrations above 0.05 mg/L.

Particularly troublesome

experimental problems included inconsistent biomass measurements by optical density and wall growth. Suggested biokinetic parameters are: µ = 0.0074 min-1, Ks = 0.0022 mg/L, and K.1 = 31 mg/L (for Andrews model); µmax =0.0057 min-1, and Ks = 0.00088 mg/L (for Monod model); and k0= 0.0058 min-1 (for the zero-order model)

BIODEGRADATION OF NAPHTHALENE USING PSEUDOMONAS purida (ATCC 17484) IN BATCH AND CHEMOSTAT REACTORS

by Jay Boyd Best

A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the New Jersey Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science Department of Chemical Engineering, Chemistry, and Environmental Science October 1997

APPROVAL PAGE

BIODEGRADATION OF NAPHTHALENE USING PSEUDOMONAS putida (ATCC 17484) IN BATCH AND CHEMOSTAT REACTORS Jay Boyd Best

Dr Gordon Lewandowski, Thesis Advisor Chairperson and Distinguished Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Chemistry, and Environmental Science, MIT

Dr. Piero M. A rmenante, Committee Member Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Chemistry, and Environmental Science, MIT

Dr. David Kafkewitz, Committee Member Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University - Newark

( Dart

Date

ate

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

Author:

Jay Boyd Best

Degree:

Master of Science in Chemical Engineering

Date:

October 1997

Undergraduate and Graduate Education: •

Master of Science in Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, 1997



Bachelor of Science in Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989

Presentations and Publications: •

Best, Jay B. "Economic Analysis of the New Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure," Proceedings of Superfund 1990, Washington DC, November 1990.



Best, Jay B. and Simone, Deborah "Evaluations of High Concentrations of VOCs in Landfill Gas: A Case Study of the Rose Hill Regional Landfill Superfund Site," Proceedings of the New England Environmental Expo, Boston, Massachusetts, October 1994.

iv

To my wife and daughter.

V

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

There are a number of people with out whose help this project would have been impossible. I would like to thank Professor Gordon Lewandowski for his guidance and support as my thesis advisor, Professors David Kafkawitz for serving on my thesis committee and providing troubleshooting when I encountered problems, and Piero Armenante for serving on my thesis committee and providing the inspiration to switch to the Chemical Engineering program. Many people played a role in my enrollment at NJIT in the chemical engineering program. I would like to thank former Professor Vital Aelion for encouraging me to attend NJIT, and Professor Richard Trattner for allowing me to attend and ensuring my initial departmental support. Additional thanks go to: Dilip Mandal, who has provided me extraordinary help throughout my experimental work; and Gwen San Agustin and Clint Brockway who on several occasions were able to troubleshoot various analytical systems for me. Finally, this would not have been possible without a grant from the Northeast Hazardous Substance Research Center at NJIT.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter

Page

1 INTRODUCTION

1

2 LITERATURE REVIEW

3

3 OBJECTIVES

9

4 EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS AND REAGENTS

10

4.1 Shake Flasks

10

4.2 Jacketed-Batch Reactors

10

4.3 Chemostats

11

4.4 Analytical Equipment

11

4.5 Reagent Preparation

13

4.5.1 Nutrient Broth

13

4.5.2 Inorganic Growth Medum

13

4.5.3 Naphthalene-Saturated Growth Medium

13

4.5.4 Calibration Standards

14

5 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

15

5.1 Selection of Culture

15

5.2 Naphthalene Sampling and Analysis

16

5.2.1 Collection of Samples

16

5.2.2 Naphthalene Analysis by HPLC

17

5.3 Biomass Concentration Measurements by Optical Density 5.4 Shake Flasks 5.4.1 Preliminary Measurements

22

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

Page

Chapter 5.4.2 Multi-Concentration Shake Flask Experiments

-)3

5.5 Jacketed Reactor with Aeration 5.5.1 Measurement of Naphthalene Loss by Abiotic Mechanisms

)5

5.5.2 Measurement of Naphthalene Loss due to Biodegradation

26 28

5.6 Chemostats

30

6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

30

6.1 Shake Flasks 6.I.1 Preliminary Measurements

30

6.1.2 Multi-Concentration Experiments

32

6.2 Jacketed-Batch Reactor with .Aeration 6.2.1 Naphthalene Loss by Abiotic Mechanisms

35 35

6.2.1.1 Naphthalene Loss Due to Volatilization

36

6.2.1.2 Naphthalene Loss due to Adsorption to the Reactor Surfaces

37

6.2.2 Naphthalene Loss Due to Biodegradation

39

6.3 Chemostat

45

6.4 Determination of Kinetic Parameters

49

6.5 Summary

56

7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

viii

61

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

Page

Chapter APPENDIX A RE-ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM BUITRON AND CAPDEVILLE 1993; AND GOLDSMITH AND BALDERSON 1989

66

APPENDIX B OPTICAL DENSITY CALIBRATION FOR MEASUREMENT OF BIOMASS

69

APPENDIX C ESTIMATION OF MONOD PARAMETERS FROM PRELIMINARY SHAKE-FLASK EXPERIMENTS

72

APPENDIX D GROWTH/DEGRADATION CURVES FOR SHAKEFLASK EXPERIMENTS

80

APPENDIX E SEMI-LOG PLOTS OF SHAKE-FLASK DATA

84

APPENDIX F THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF STRIPPING LOSSES.

88

APPENDIX G GROWTH/DEGRADATION CURVES FOR JACKETEDBATCH EXPERIMENTS

89

APPENDIX H PREDICTED NAPHTHALENE AND BIOMASS CONCENTRATION CURVES FOR BATCH EXPERIMENTS

107

REFERENCES

113

ix

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure

5

2-1

Naphthalene Degradation Pathway

4-1

Schematic Diagram of Jacketed-Batch and Chemostat Reactors

12

5-1

Comparison of Naphthalene Degradation in Each Culture

16

5-2

Typical Chromatogram of Sample Containing Naphthalene

19

5-3

Typical Calibration Curve

19

6-1

Comparison of Naphthalene Concentrations in Preliminary Shake-Flask Experiments.

31

Experimental Biomass and Naphthalene Concentrations for a Typical Shake Flask Experiment

33

Experimental Shake-Flask Results

34

6-2

6-3 6-4

Volatilization Loss Parameter (k) as Function of Aeration Rate (Qair) at 29.5°C in 2-Liter Reaction Vessel

38

6-5

Naphthalene Concentration Due to Desorption

39

6-6

Specific-Growth Rates from Jacketed-Batch Experiments at 29° C

42

6-7

10/96 45 Biomass and Naphthalene Measurements

43

6-8

Specific-Growth Rates Determined from Jacketed-Batch Experiments Conducted at 25° C

44

Biomass and Naphthalene Concentrations in "11/96 - Batch 11"

47

6-9

6-10 Specific-Growth Rate Determined by Chemostat at 29.5° C

48

6-11

50

Specific-Growth Rate Determined by Chemostat at 25.5° C

6-12 Parameter Fitting of Non-Aerated Experimental Data

53

6-13 Parameter Fitting of Aerated Experimental Data at 29.5° C

54

6-14 Parameter Fitting of Aerated Experimental Data at 25.5° C

55

6-15 Parameter Fining of All Experimental Data

57

6-16 Simulation vs. Experimental Biomass and Naphthalene Concentrations

61

LIST OF TABLES Page

Table 2-1

Naphthalene Degradation Rates Provided in Literature

4-1

Growth Medium Composition

13

4-2

Working Standard Concentrations and Dilutions

14

5-1

HPLC Parameters for Naphthalene Analysis

18

5-2

Optical Density Calibration Measurements

22

5-3

Preliminary Shake Flask Experiments

22

5-4

Experimental Dilutions for Multi-Concentration Shake Flask Experiments

)4

8

5-5

Summary of Jacketed Batch Reactor Experiments

5-6

Summary of Chemostat Experiments

'79

6-1

Summary of Shake-Flask Experiment Results

35

6-2

Naphthalene Concentration in Methanol Rinses of Reactor Surface

39

6-3

Summary of Jacketed-Batch Experiment Results

45

6-4

Comparison Yields Calculated for "I1/96 - Batch 11."

47

6-5

Summary of Chemostat Experiment Results

51

6-6

Fitted Kinetic Parameters for Non-Aerated Experiments

53

6-7

Fitted Kinetic Parameters for Aerated Experiments at 29.5° C

55

6-8

Fitted Kinetic Parameters for Aerated Experiments at 25.5° C

56

6-9

Fitted Kinetic Parameters for All Data

58

6-10 Summary of Model Parameters

59

6-11 Summary of Monod Parameters Available from the Literature

60

7-1

Summary of Model Parameters

65

7-2

Experimental Problems and Possible Solutions

65

Xi

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Biological treatment of wastewater has been extensively studied and there are many excellent references describing these processes. More recently a great deal of attention has been focused on the in-situ bioremediation of organic compounds at contaminated sites. Of particular concern has been the restoration of groundwater resources at these sites One important application of bioremediation is the treatment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), some of which are known to be carcinogenic (Dipple et al. 1990). PAHs are produced by many industrial processes such as coal gasification (Luthy et al. 1994) and oil refining. They are major constituents in fossil fuels like coal, crude oil, and heavy petroleum fractions. Natural processes such as volcanic eruptions and forest fires also produce PAHs. Due to the many processes that contribute to PAH formation, they are ubiquitous in the environment (Cerniglia 1993). In-situ bioremediation has the potential to cost-effectively restore or reduce PAH contamination in groundwater. In practice, however, in-situ bioremediation is an extremely complicated technology. Cerniglia (I993) points out that there are many factors effecting the biodegradation of PAHs "including soil type, moisture content, concentration of the PAH, redox conditions, sediment toxicity, temperature, pH, electron acceptors, per cent organic matter, seasonal factors, the presence of PAH-degrading organisms, inorganic nutrient availability, depth, diffusion and physiochemical properties of the PAH." Since remediation is costly and time consuming, the importance of a reliable engineering model to analyze in-situ remediation options prior to committing resources cannot be overemphasized. Although the soil-groundwater system is complex due to the interaction of organic compounds with the soil and groundwater phases, many models assume that biodegradation occurs only when the organic con-pound is "bioavailable," and a compound is generally only bioavailable when it is the aqueous phase. Thus, the rate of degradation of compounds in the aqueous phase is of particular importance. 1

2

The simplest PAH, and the focus of this investigation, is the two-ringed compound naphthalene. Although only mildly toxic and non-carcinogenic, naphthalene is a useful model compound for other PAHs. Naphthalene is a hydrophobic compound with a relatively low aqueous solubility of 31.7 mg/L (May et al. 1978). At room temperature it is a solid with a melting point of 80.2 deg C. Based on vapor pressures in Perry's Chemical Engineers Handbook (1984; pg 3-58) and a three parameter Antoine Correlation, naphthalene has vapor pressures of 0.096 and 0.145 nun Hg at 26° and 30° C, respectively. As will be discussed in the next chapter, many investigators have determined simple first-order rate constants for naphthalene degradation. These assume a simple linear relationship between the rate of naphthalene loss and the naphthalene concentration for a given biomass concentration. rate of naphthalene loss = -k x [biomass colic] x [naphthalene conc.] The proportionality constant k is the first-order rate constant.

(1-1)

Although the

relationship is frequently true at low concentrations, at high concentrations a maximum degradation rate is reached. For some compounds the degradation may actually fall at higher substrate concentrations due to toxic effects. As might be imagined, more complex models are required to model these systems. Monod and Andrews models consider maximum and inhibitory effects, respectively. This investigation determines the kinetic rate parameters for two parameter (Monod), and three parameter (Andrews) kinetic models in aqueous systems.

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

In order to determine the extent of previous research related to this thesis, a review of the available scientific literature was conducted. Computerized searches using the Engineering Index (EI) and Chemical Abstract Services (CAS) produced approximately 150 references. Keyword searches were used to obtain references related to naphthalene and biodegradation rates, or naphthalene and Pseudomonas putida.

The number of potentially relevent

references was further reduced following a review of their abstracts. Approximately 70 references were located for final review. References that were considered to make some contribution to understanding issues relevant to this thesis are referenced in the text and appear in the bibliography. There are many references in the literature that describe the partial or complete degradation of naphthalene in the environment (Albrechtsen et al. 1992; Nielsen and Christensen I994; Nielsen et al. I996; Heitcamp et al. 1987; Elmendorf et al. 1994). A concise but excellent review article that discusses the biodegradation of PAHs is provided by Cerniglia (1993). Pathways for naphthalene degradation by bacteria have been well characterized (Cerniglia 1993, Eaton and Chapman 1992). Figure 2-1 illustrates the degradation pathway of naphthalene to salicylic acid. Naphthalene first undergoes oxidation to form cis-1,2dihydroxy-I,2-dihydronaphthalene. After several steps, the oxygenated aromatic ring is opened to form trans-o-hydroxy-benzylidenepyruvate. After several more steps, salicylic acid is formed. Relative difficulty in degrading PAHs roughly follows increasing molecular weight of substrate. In a study of sediment:water microcosms by Heitkamp and Cerniglia (I987), naphthalene (128 g/Mol), the simplest PAH, had a half-life of 2.4-4.4 weeks compared to 200->300 weeks for benzo[a]pyrene (252 g/Mol). Similar results were reported by Sims et al. (1990) when working with soil-only systems.

3

4

Figure 2-1. Naphthalene Degradation Pathway

5

The genetic organization of the plasmids responsible for naphthalene and salicylate degradation in Pseudomonas putida GI have been well characterized (Yen 1982). The genes for naphthalene metabolism are on an 83-kilobase plasmid (nah7). Salicylate provides control for the expression of these genes. An important feature of this type of control is that there is always a low level of naphthalene degrading activity. As naphthalene degradation produces salicylate, more messenger RNA is transcribed, resulting in more enzyme formation and greater degradation. This induction model is supported by results of Guerin and Boyd (1995) who showed that for Pseudomonas putida (ATCC 17484) naphthalene degradation activity was present at a low level even after nine months of growth in nutrient medium. High levels of degradation activity could be generated within 15 minutes of exposure to naphthalene. Another naphthalene degrading bacteria from the genus Alcalgenes (strain NP-Alk) showed no naphthalene degradation activity after prolonged growth without naphthalene and required many hours of naphthalene exposure to readapt. It would seem that there is more than one scheme for control of naphthalene degradation. The importance of the nah7 naphthalene dioxygenase gene mentioned previously is underscored by a study conducted by Fleming et al. (1993). They showed a quantitative relationship between the presence of the nah7 naphthalene dioxygenase gene and PAH degradation in contaminated soils. One of the unique aspects of their method is that no cell cultivation is required prior to extracting and- quantitating the nah7 naphthalene dioxygenase gene mRNA levels. Müncnerová and Augustin (1994) provide an excellent review of the literature regarding the metabolism of PAHs by certain fungi such as Cunninghamella elegans. Cutright et al. have evaluated C. elegans for use in remediating PAH contaminated soils (1994). There are a number of different fungal species that are able to degrade several of the low-molecular-weight PAHs but encounter significant difficulty with larger molecules of 5 or more rings. Unlike bacterial degradation which oxygenates the PAH to fowl a cisdihydrodiol, fungal degradation oxygenates to the trans-dihydrodiol indicating a completely different reactive pathway utilizing the cytochrome P-450 monoxygenases (Müncnerová

6 and Augustin 1994; and Cemiglia 1993). A third pathway, used by "white rot" fungi such as Phanerochaeie chrysosporium, involves the extracellular attack of free radicals initiated by lignin peroxydases on PAHs (Cemiglia 1994; Bumpus 1993). The PAHs are first oxidized to quinones prior to ring cleavage. Algae have also been reported to metabolize PAHs, primarily under photoautotrophic conditions. The mechanisms and pathways for algal degradation of PAHs are not yet fully understood (Cerniglia 1994). Mihelcic and Luthy (1988a & b) have investigated PAH degradation under a variety of redox conditions. This is particularly important since in many environmental systems where PAH contamination is present, oxygen is limited. Luthy and Mihelcic found that naphthalene and acenaphthene were degraded under aerobic and denitrifying conditions. In the absence of oxygen or nitrate, these PAHs were not degraded. Samson et al. (1990) confirmed the degradation of naphthalene under denitrifying conditions with further investigation of sorption-desorption effects. The biodegradation of PAHs is to a large extent limited by their bioavailabilty which is often equated to the aqueous solubility. The generally hydrophobic nature of PAHs results in the partitioning of a large fraction of the PAHs into the organic phase of soil (Samson et al. 1990; Guerin and Boyd 1992) or non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) in a multi-phase system (Samson et al. 1990; Ghoshal et al. 1996). Log Koc values, which measure the partitioning of a compound between octanol and water, have been reported as 2.74 (Abdul, Gibson and Rai 1987) and 2.68 (Guerin and Boyd 1992). Since many environmental systems of concern contain both aqueous and solid phases, a number of studies have investigated degradation in soil-water systems (Heitkamp et al. 1987; Nielsen et al. 1996; Guerin and Boyd 1992; Ahn et al. 1996; Luthy et al. 1994; Al-Bashir et al. 1990; Heitkamp and Cerniglia 1987; Mihelic and Luthy 1988a & b). In a variation of the soil-water or NAPL-water systems, research by Volkering's group (Volkering et al. 1992 and 1993) has focused on the degradation of naphthalene when added as crystals to batch experiments; their results indicate that under most conditions mass transfer limits the rate of degradation. Particularly at former manufactured gas plants (MGP) sites, non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) are present. These liquids are complex mixtures of organic compounds,

7 many of them PAHs. A review article by Luthy et al. (1994) provides an overview of the complex issues that surround the cleanup of MGP sites. Volatilization appears to play some role in the loss of the low molecular weight PAHs naphthalene and 1-methylnaphthalene from soils. Sims et al. reported volatilization losses of 30 and 20% for these two compounds, respectively (1990) The same study also found losses of 2-20% by abiotic reaction mechanisms for 2- and 3-ring PAI-I compounds.. A major gap in the literature concerns the evaluation of aqueous biodegradation rate constants. Of the 70 articles reviewed, eleven contained degradation rates. The rates provided (and their limitations) are presented in Table 2-1. Although several references provided values for the Monod parameters (µmax, and Ks) the experiments were generally of limited scope. Two references (Buitron and Capdeville 1993; and Goldsmith and Balderson 1989) provided data that could be re-analyzed (see Appendix A) to determine rate parameters. But these experiments are also of limited scope and the re-analysis based on only a few data points. None of the references in Table 2-1 indicated any difficulty with wall growth or variability of biomass measurements. A critical issue when considering the treatment of any hazardous compound using biological methods is possible inhibitory effects. None of the literature cited considered use of a model with substrate inhibition. This is not surprising since only a few researchers have even attempted to use a two parameter, Monod, model. One paper was found that examined the possibility that naphthalene might be an inhibitor to growth on naturally occurring, biogenic matter (Volskay and Grady 1990). Volskay and Grady used two screening tests to examine the inhibitory effects of a number of compounds including naphthalene. Naphthalene was found to have a 40% and 26% inhibition by the RIKA and OECD method 209 screening procedures, respectively, at the aqueous saturation concentration for naphthalene (31.7 mg/L). The level of difficulty of determining appropriate kinetic parameters is exemplified by a recent publication explaining a model for coupled mass transport and biodegradation (Ahn et al.1996). Although they used naphthalene as a test compound for their model, the values they included for kinetic parameters were guesses based on literature values for other compounds.

8 Table 2-1. Naphthalene Degradation Rates Provided in Literature Degradation Rate

Reference

Comments

108.6 - 24.5 (L/g/h)

Buitron and Capdeville (1993)

(Based on Re-analysis) 2.4 to 4.4 (weeks, as naphthalene half-lives in sediment)

Degradation rates provided in reference are for µmax/ Ks. S