Brine spills associated with unconventional oil development in North ...

Report 2 Downloads 28 Views
Supporting Information

Brine spills associated with unconventional oil development in North Dakota Nancy E. Lauer1, Jennifer S. Harkness1, Avner Vengosh1*

1

Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States

*Corresponding author phone: 919-681-8050. Fax: 919-684-5833; email: [email protected]

Contents

Page

1. Sample Collection Protocols

S2

2. Supporting Figures (9 figures)

S3-S11

3. Supporting Tables (8 tables)

S12-S18

S1

Sample Collection Protocols Water samples were collected from July 9- July 14, 2015. Samples were collected for analysis of (1) major anions, (2) major cations, (3) trace metals, (4) strontium isotopes, (5) oxygen and hydrogen isotopes, (6) alkalinity, and (7) dissolved organic carbon, and (8) dissolved radium. Samples collected for major anions, Sr isotopes, and dissolved organic carbon were filtered in the field in new high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sample bottles using 0.45µm syringe filters. Samples collected for major cations and trace metals were filtered (0.45µm syringe filters) in the field in new HDPE sample bottles that were acid washed and preserved using ~10% high purity nitric acid. Samples collected for alkalinity and oxygen and hydrogen isotopes were collected unfiltered and underwater in new HDPE sample bottles with zero headspace. Immediately following collection, samples were stored on ice until returned to the laboratory. Dissolved Ra was measured in select spill water samples by concentrating dissolved Ra on manganese oxide fibers. 2-25 liters of spill water were run through two sequential columns each containing ~10 grams of MnO fibers. Flow rates were kept at less than 1 liter per minute, and if necessary, samples were diluted using distilled water to conductivity less than 10 mS/cm to ensure efficient adsorption of Ra to the fibers. The two fibers for each sample were analyzed on the gamma detector separately. In spill waters containing dissolved Ra, all Ra appeared to be captured on the first fiber, indicating that nearly 100% retention of the samples dissolved Ra on the fiber.

S2

Supporting Figures

Figure S1. Specific locations of collected spillwater and spill sediments in the Bear Den Bay Spill site. Soil/sediment samples were collected at ND102A, ND102B, ND102C, ND102D, ND102E, and ND103. Water samples were collected at ND102 and ND103. Lake Sakakawea is located downstream of the spill.

S3

Figure S2. Specific locations of collected spill water and spill sediments in the Blacktail Creek Spill site. Soil/sediment samples were collected at ND125, ND124, ND123, ND123A, ND123B, and ND122. Water samples were collected at ND125, ND124, ND123, ND126, and ND122.

S4

Figure S3. Alkalinity vs. TOC in all samples

S5

Figure S4. Lithium, strontium, and boron vs. chloride in water samples, sorted by water source.

S6

Figure S5. δ2H vs. δ18O in water samples, sorted by water types. Stable isotopes in background surface water were highly correlated with a slope of ~5.4 (r=0.92). Such a slope is expected from mixing of the Bakken brines (red circles) with background water, which was observed in Type A spills.

S7

Figure S6. Sulfate, barium, and manganese vs. chloride in water samples, sorted by water source.

S8

Figure S7. Brine spills vs. oil and gas wells in North Dakota. Note the positive correlation (R2= 0.66) between the number of brine spills and the number of oil and gas wells, suggesting there is a relatively higher occurrence of spills in areas with higher well density. This co-occurrence of brine spills and oil and gas wells is drawn from comparing the number of brine spills to the number of gas wells in each township (36 square miles) in North Dakota.

S9

Figure S8. A histogram of the occurrences of spills volumes in North Dakota since 2007. Note that the data has been log transformed. Data were compiled from North Dakota Department of Health: Environmental Releases & Investigations. (https://www.ndhealth.gov/WQ/GW/spills.htm)

S10

Figure S9. The distribution of brine spills sources in North Dakota based on (A) the volume of spilled brine, and (B) the number of spills. Data were compiled from North Dakota Department of Health: Environmental Releases & Investigations. (https://www.ndhealth.gov/WQ/GW/spills.htm)

S11

Supporting Tables Table S1. Sample description

Sample ID

Lat (N)

Long (W)

Spill Date

Spill Volume (bbls)

Documented Spill Cause

Sampled Water Type

Description

Type A Spills ND102

47.78302

-102.65152

1/17/15

70,000

Pipeline

Small pond, standing water

Bear Den Brine Spill

ND103

47.7827

-102.6511

1/17/15

70,000

Pipeline

Small pond, standing water

Bear Den Brine Spill, uphill of ND102

ND113

47.86885

-102.95044

Wetlands

Brine Spill adjacent to plant

ND123

48.39835

-103.62457

7/7/14

24,000

Pipeline

River

Blacktail Creek, 10 m downstream of spill

ND126

48.39835

-103.62457

7/8/14

24,000

Pipeline

River

Blacktail Creek, sample collected on spill site

ND120

48.47578

-102.8269

Small pond/wetlands

Located adjacent to well pad

ND128

48.77762

-101.31268

2/25/11

300

Connection Leak

Small pond/wetlands

0.1 mile away from storage tanks

ND129

48.79811

-101.34384

7/20/11

300

Pipeline

Standing water

0.25 mile away from spill

ND130

48.80805

-101.19978

Small pond/wetlands

Located adjacent to disposal site

ND131

48.73949

-101.23452

Standing water

Located in ditch on side of road next to rig

PW1

Produced Water

Bakken Produced Water

PW2

Produced Water

Bakken Produced Water

PW3

Produced Water

Bakken Produced Water

PW4

Produced Water

Bakken Produced Water

Type B Spills

Produced Water

Background Sites ND104

47.73263

-102.59772

Pond from natural spring

Previous evidence for bubbling

ND105

47.80302

-102.54898

Large Lake

Bear Den Drinking Water Intake in Lake Sakakawea

ND106

47.66506

-102.54247

Pond

ND107

47.66431

-102.545

Stream

Area covered with salts; stream meets with ND106 pond

ND108

47.59779

-102.51086

River

Little Missouri Tributary

ND109

47.61797

-102.60488

Stream

McGregor Creek; Rig sites nearby

ND110

47.6116

-102.77017

River

Little Missouri Tributary

ND111

47.59742

-102.76648

River

Little Missouri River

ND112

47.32603

-102.8495

Standing Water

Standing water on well pad

ND114

47.8825

-102.95243

Wetlands

Adjacent to well pad

ND116

47.8287

-103.32613

Stream

ND117

47.81425

-102.71712

Stream

Bear Den Creek

ND118

47.95393

-102.7517

Stream

Clark's Creek

ND119

48.17346

-102.38839

Stream

ND121

48.02315

-102.18806

Stream

Shell Creek

ND122

48.37291

-103.59431

River

Blacktail Creek; Downstream of spill site

ND124

48.41182

-103.68964

River

Blacktail Creek; Upstream of spill site

ND125

48.41645

-103.70071

River

Blacktail Creek; Upstream of spill site

ND127

47.9469

-102.20802

Stream

Stream near 260 barrel brine spill

S12

Table S2. Major chemistry of all samples Sample ID Type A Spills ND102 ND103 ND113 ND123 ND126 AVERAGE Type B Spills ND120 ND128 ND129 ND130 ND131 AVERAGE Produced Water PW1 PW2 PW3 PW4 AVERAGE Background Sites ND104 ND105 ND106 ND107 ND108 ND109 ND110 ND111 ND112 ND114 ND116 ND117 ND118 ND119 ND121 ND122 ND124 ND125 ND127 AVERAGE

Cl mg/L

Br mg/L

SO4 mg/L

Alkalinity Ca mg/L mg/L

Mg mg/L

Sr mg/L

Na mg/L

NH4+ mg/L

14795 16032 996 1487 1900 7042

72.5 74.0 5.5 5.2 5.9 33

1713 3210 4090 3025 3117 3031

279 247 668 880 941 603

1953 1773 576 156 212 934

684 902 376 235 258 491

52.6 51.1 5.7 3.5 4.7 24

6003 6754 1513 2029 2282 3716

9.14 42.4 0.62 21.0 17.0 18

207 269 5833 189 18703 5040

0.22 0.56 5.8 0.17 20.5 5

464 946 856 387 2739 1078

306 466 116 345 110 268

111 187 1225 109 1381 603

101 148 475 91 2220 607

0.46 0.89 5.94 0.49 8.53 3.3

102 298 1876 99 6829 1841

0.76 0.40