Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan 4]
Mountain View
Center St
Mission St
)[22] 202(14
27]
275(12)[
613(41)[55]
865(54)[83]
8
10
10
] )[5
AD
m 30
ST
ph
O BR
3 7(2
LEGEND
6] 22
Signalized Intersection
XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Bike Segment Volumes
XX mph
85th Percentile Vehicle Speeds
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Pedestrian Crossing Volumes
Broad St
0(1)
1(2)
12
63(51) 175(116) 2(3)
140(69) 38(35) 1(2)
7(4) 10(8) 3(0)
2(0)
1(6)
Broad St
Lincoln St
0(3) 59(88) 0(0) 2(1)
11
2(3) 216(166) 2(3)
2(0)
2(2) 5(2) 4(4)
1(0)
0(1)
Broad St
6(4) 222(177)
Mountain View
Center St
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Auto Segment Volumes
83(164) 5(16) 35(87)
3(2) 61(85) 1(1)
10
XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
5(10)
1(1) 2(1) 1(2)
6(3)
Murray Ave
Stop Controlled Intersection
5(8)
Mission St
758(70)[76]
0] 14 2)[ 22
8
]
2 )[1
Note: Traffic count data collected during a typical weekday (Tues, Wed, Thurs) with schools in session during 2014 and 2016. Peak hour volumes reflect the highest hourly volume during the AM (7-9 AM) and PM (3:30-6:00 PM) periods.
Existing Traffic Volumes - North Segment
30
[3]
)[7
(9 51
LN 1(1)
AM(PM)
AM(PM)
1
(6)
(10
2]
5 2(7
9(8)
5(2) 1(0) 1(3)
91(77) 704(441) 2(3)
7(9)
10
2
4
Broad St
9
10(6) 176(153) 2(3)
(25
11
]
N IO
6(7) 0(1) 13(22)
Broad St
2(1)
4(0)
12(13)
8
22(23) 202(169)
96
70
9] 5)[
89
956(79)[91]
( T NS OL 97] )[1
(12
( 100
ST ER NT 11)[9] ( ph
23
2(6) 65(89) 0(0)
]
2 5)[
m 30
AM(PM)
AM(PM)
Foothill Blvd
C LIN
1
( 45
12
[5 3) 2(
21 )[1 1 9
14
8)[
3068(255)[296]
3(10) 96(98)
]
68
83(20)[9]
SERRANO
9(13)
Lincoln St
IN MOUNTA VIEW ST
CE
27 mph
25(39)
61(141) 441(738) 6(2)
22(30)
2(2)
213(134) 3(5) 6(1)
14(35)
10
SS MI
RAMONA DR
19(9) 7(4) 0(2)
1(2)
8(11)
ph
2)[19 07(22
10(4)
Broad St
[13]
(10)
12 1)[
BROAD ST
2855(254)[247]
7
31 m
ST
5(1
5
] 220 56)[ 2 ( 0 260
128
3
N ST MISSIO
73(17)[8]
0(0) 0(0) 5(2)
5(1
)[1
N NOT TO SCALE
80 30
6
9
2(4)
Chorro St
RO
R CHO
] 0)[332
91(13)[9]
26 mph 8
6
371
1445(191)[121]
1793(125)[181] 87(14)[9]
7
0(0) 222(168) 27(21)
0(0)
22
6
6(9) 0(0) 2(3)
26
8 (28
5]
]
(7)[12]
BENTON WY
81(145) 3(0) 50(57)
3(4) 2(0) 2(1)
WEST ST
MURRAY AVE
MEINECKE AVE
FOOTHILL BLVD
ph
31 m
ST
BR
] 60 )[2
86]
4
D OA
2
2)[3 5(26
[13] (13)
3242(
4 69
10
6(19)
2127(246)[183]
4(28) 258(324) 94(172)
Chorro St
3]
2
2427(216)[215]
LINCOLN ST
1(2) 256(381) 3(3)
4(2) 265(187) 3(5)
(14)[13]
(4)[5]
2543(173)[187]
(2
5
AM(PM)
(7)[8]
1
0(2)
AM(PM) AM(PM)
AM(PM)
AM(PM) AM(PM) TO AM(PM) BE
DATA Chorro St COLLECTED 4 AM(PM) FALL 2016
5(13)
2812(248)[279]
4(7)
AM(PM) AM(PM) AM(PM)
5(5) 232(171) 5(5)
1(2)
Chorro St
3
5(8)
AM(PM) AM(PM) AM(PM)
2(5) 249(323) 12(28)
17(9) 2(5) 3(4)
12(14) 19(22) 3(3)
5(5) 202(166) 2(2)
2(0)
Chorro St
2
1(2)
1(4)
137(64) 620(481) 23(40)
46(54) 37(39) 23(37)
13(48)
Chorro St
1
16(21) 231(288) 12(34)
AM(PM)
AM(PM)
62(52) 45(41) 133(182)
3(6)
2(6) 5(2) 2(5)
19(25) 19(33) 12(11)
51(59) 336(684) 35(38)
15(34)
Foothill Blvd
3(5) Murray Ave
9(25)
[27
) 03
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan N
N OL C LIN
ST
A
UT LN
ST
NOT TO SCALE
W
Chorro St
Chorro St
1(3) Broad St
Chorro St
3(3)
Palm St
17
15(12) 29(43) 6(12)
0(0)
ST
Palm St
16
44(50) 84(76) 145(136)
91(175) 9(22) 42(50)
38(95) 62(66) 22(9)
[9]
m
LM
11(25) 38(110) 3(12) 0(2)
6)
]
26
T
3(4)
(1
)[8
8]
2 (1
[11
]
HS
4(12)
28(22) 138(169) 12(24)
9)
ST
96
ph
28
AC
11(23) 159(234) 4(3)
21(28)
10(8)
15(5)
(8
28
AD
)[2
03
(2
] )[0 (0
27
14
)[1
5
8]
1(1)
16
1 7(
7
]
)[5
(0
ph
m
PE
6(8)
Mill St
15
37(6) 21(11) 13(7)
62(56) 76(76) 73(88)
ST
7 7(
98
Y RE
2] )[7 5 4 2( 68
ST
TE
N MO
NI M PO
A AZ PL
O ST
RA
ST
LEGEND
E
GU
Signalized Intersection
HI
Stop Controlled Intersection XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Auto Segment Volumes
XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Bike Segment Volumes
XX mph
85th Percentile Vehicle Speeds
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Pedestrian Crossing Volumes
D
OA
BR ST
Note: Traffic count data collected during a typical weekday (Tues, Wed, Thurs) with schools in session during 2014 and 2016. Peak hour volumes reflect the highest hourly volume during the AM (7-9 AM) and PM (3:30-6:00 PM) periods.
Existing Traffic Volumes - South Segment
4(4)
09
[1 3)
I SS I M
TE N MO
4(2)
O
]
39(42) 185(196) 67(23)
RR
ST
] 74
O
0]
[26
T LS
ON
Y RE
5(4) 205(342) 24(10)
ST
17(9)
28(85) 29(30) 14(17)
PA
17
ST
Peach St
14
88(129) 7(11) 19(16)
MO
R OR
) 88
)[2 03 (2 94 26
CH (2
80
30
L MI
11(37) 12(11) 1(3)
1
9(
9 11
15
11
O BR
51
15
101
28
[1
) 05
7(7)
OS
OS
]
14
10(12) 237(514) 0(1)
] [27
ph
PE
Walnut St
13
1(4) 1(0) 2(0)
0(0)
0(0)
ph
m
]
5) (1
0 )[2
ST
70(143) 1(1) 6(19)
9(11) 42(19) 250(233) 17(9)
35
(31
m 36
H AC
53(16) 14(4) 338(255) 113(69)
44(16) 382(325) 1(0)
13
Chorro St
5(11)
For an ideal bicycle boulevard, traffic volumes should be 1,500 vehicles per day (veh/day) or less to provide a comfortable, low‐stress environment for cyclists of all ability levels, although volumes up to 3,000 veh/day can be accommodated. When volumes exceed 3,000 veh/day, a shared facility (vehicles and bikes share the travelway) is likely to be uncomfortable for less‐ experienced riders. North of Lincoln Street, Broad Street traffic volumes are currently 500‐2,000 veh/day above the maximum daily volume range recommended for a bicycle boulevard. Existing volume data suggests that volume management design strategies (i.e. traffic diverters, partial closures, etc.) should be considered for the bicycle boulevard to facilitate a low‐stress bicycling environment.
Streets developed as bicycle boulevards should have prevailing motor vehicle speeds (85th percentile speeds) of 25 mph or less, with 20 mph preferred to provide a low‐street bicycling environment. Speed surveys were conducted along several segments of the Broad Street corridor: between Monterey Street and US 101; between Lincoln Street and Mission Street; and between Mission Street and Ramona Drive. Throughout the corridor, prevailing speeds exceeded the ideal range for a bicycle boulevard, particularly between Mission Street and Lincoln Street where prevailing speeds were nearly 10 mph above the ideal level. Existing data suggests that speed management design strategies (i.e. traffic circles, speed humps, neckdowns/lane narrowing, etc.) should be considered for the bicycle boulevard to provide a low‐stress bicycling environment.
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan RO OR CH
1
ST
N
Pacheco Elementary
California Polytechnic State University
N
I RD FERRIN
PATRICIA DR
Bishop's Peak Elementary
PLANNED CERRO ROMAULDO BICYCLE BOULEVARD
CERRO ROMAULDO AVE
NOT TO SCALE
FOOTHILL BLVD
OR A
NI
Santa Rosa Park
O ST
ST
Creek
Old Garden Creek
D
OA
BR
R CENTE
IL M
ST
ST
ST
OA ST
R TE
ON
M
O ST
ST
Planning Area Context and Bicycle Connectivity
A ER U G HI
RR
RO OR
Mission Plaza
EY
ST
MO
Mission College Prep. School
CH
Bicycle Boulevard
ST
P
Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane) Class III Bikeway (Bike Route)
Downtown San Luis Obispo
M AL
D
Old Mission School
OS
H AC PE
BR
Class I Bikeway (Bike Path)
ST
W
L
LEGEND
ST
SA
AL
T NU
RO
LIN
A
Community Garden
T
NS
L CO
OS
PROPOSED LONG-TERM CLOSURE OF US 101/ BROAD ST RAMPS AND CONSTRUCTION OF GRADE-SEPARATED BIKE/PED CROSSING OF US 101
VIEW TAIN
NT SA
N MOU Lincoln Deli
101
Stenner
N ST
MISSIO
PLANNED BROAD ST. BICYCLE BOULEVARD
VD
MURRAY AVE
BISHOP'S PEAK/PACHECO ELEMENTARY SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS WILL EXPLORE BIKE/PED CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS TO IMPROVE CONNECTIVITY ACROSS FOOTHILL BLVD.
H E D F ROM S C HOO L S
BL
/ B IK ES
MEINECKE AVE
CHORR
WA LK
LIF
LE
CA
MI
The Villages
BROAD ST
2-
TASSAJARA DR
LA ENTRADA
1/
RAMONA DR
ST M
A
H RS
ST San Luis Obispo Creek
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan N NOT TO SCALE
AD
ST
O
BR
C LIN
CHORRO STREET UNDERCROSSING OF US 101
ST
ER ST
Recommended street light pole spacing for this type of street is every 200-250' per City Engineering Standards
N ST
MISSIO
MURRAY AVE
MEINECKE AVE
BENTON WY
1
NT
RRO CHO
250'
10
CE
FOOTHILL BLVD
CURB RAMPS NOT PROVIDED AT MANY CROSSINGS ALONG BROAD ST
T NS OL
Street Lighting
D OA
ST
BR
EXISTING BROAD ST/US 101 RAMPS FUTURE GRADE-SEPARATED BIKE/PED CROSSING
BROAD ST
NL
IO
SS
MI N
SERRANO
RAMONA DR
LEGEND Existing Sidewalk No Sidewalk Provided Existing Curb Ramp Existing Speed Humps Existing Street Lighting Marked Crosswalk
EXISTING SPEED HUMPS
Existing Pedestrian Facilities - North Segment
EXISTING SHARED LANE MARKINGS ("SHARROWS")
Mountain View
Center St
Mission St
)[22] 202(14
27]
275(12)[
613(41)[55]
865(54)[83]
8
10
10
] )[5
AD
m 30
ST
ph
O BR
3 7(2
LEGEND
6] 22
Signalized Intersection
XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Bike Segment Volumes
XX mph
85th Percentile Vehicle Speeds
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Pedestrian Crossing Volumes
Broad St
0(1)
1(2)
12
63(51) 175(116) 2(3)
140(69) 38(35) 1(2)
7(4) 10(8) 3(0)
2(0)
1(6)
Broad St
Lincoln St
0(3) 59(88) 0(0) 2(1)
11
2(3) 216(166) 2(3)
2(0)
2(2) 5(2) 4(4)
1(0)
0(1)
Broad St
6(4) 222(177)
Mountain View
Center St
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Auto Segment Volumes
83(164) 5(16) 35(87)
3(2) 61(85) 1(1)
10
XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
5(10)
1(1) 2(1) 1(2)
6(3)
Murray Ave
Stop Controlled Intersection
5(8)
Mission St
758(70)[76]
0] 14 2)[ 22
8
]
2 )[1
Note: Traffic count data collected during a typical weekday (Tues, Wed, Thurs) with schools in session during 2014 and 2016. Peak hour volumes reflect the highest hourly volume during the AM (7-9 AM) and PM (3:30-6:00 PM) periods.
Existing Traffic Volumes - North Segment
30
[3]
)[7
(9 51
LN 1(1)
AM(PM)
AM(PM)
1
(6)
(10
2]
5 2(7
9(8)
5(2) 1(0) 1(3)
91(77) 704(441) 2(3)
7(9)
10
2
4
Broad St
9
10(6) 176(153) 2(3)
(25
11
]
N IO
6(7) 0(1) 13(22)
Broad St
2(1)
4(0)
12(13)
8
22(23) 202(169)
96
70
9] 5)[
89
956(79)[91]
( T NS OL 97] )[1
(12
( 100
ST ER NT 11)[9] ( ph
23
2(6) 65(89) 0(0)
]
2 5)[
m 30
AM(PM)
AM(PM)
Foothill Blvd
C LIN
1
( 45
12
[5 3) 2(
21 )[1 1 9
14
8)[
3068(255)[296]
3(10) 96(98)
]
68
83(20)[9]
SERRANO
9(13)
Lincoln St
IN MOUNTA VIEW ST
CE
27 mph
25(39)
61(141) 441(738) 6(2)
22(30)
2(2)
213(134) 3(5) 6(1)
14(35)
10
SS MI
RAMONA DR
19(9) 7(4) 0(2)
1(2)
8(11)
ph
2)[19 07(22
10(4)
Broad St
[13]
(10)
12 1)[
BROAD ST
2855(254)[247]
7
31 m
ST
5(1
5
] 220 56)[ 2 ( 0 260
128
3
N ST MISSIO
73(17)[8]
0(0) 0(0) 5(2)
5(1
)[1
N NOT TO SCALE
80 30
6
9
2(4)
Chorro St
RO
R CHO
] 0)[332
91(13)[9]
26 mph 8
6
371
1445(191)[121]
1793(125)[181] 87(14)[9]
7
0(0) 222(168) 27(21)
0(0)
22
6
6(9) 0(0) 2(3)
26
8 (28
5]
]
(7)[12]
BENTON WY
81(145) 3(0) 50(57)
3(4) 2(0) 2(1)
WEST ST
MURRAY AVE
MEINECKE AVE
FOOTHILL BLVD
ph
31 m
ST
BR
] 60 )[2
86]
4
D OA
2
2)[3 5(26
[13] (13)
3242(
4 69
10
6(19)
2127(246)[183]
4(28) 258(324) 94(172)
Chorro St
3]
2
2427(216)[215]
LINCOLN ST
1(2) 256(381) 3(3)
4(2) 265(187) 3(5)
(14)[13]
(4)[5]
2543(173)[187]
(2
5
AM(PM)
(7)[8]
1
0(2)
AM(PM) AM(PM)
AM(PM)
AM(PM) AM(PM) TO AM(PM) BE
DATA Chorro St COLLECTED 4 AM(PM) FALL 2016
5(13)
2812(248)[279]
4(7)
AM(PM) AM(PM) AM(PM)
5(5) 232(171) 5(5)
1(2)
Chorro St
3
5(8)
AM(PM) AM(PM) AM(PM)
2(5) 249(323) 12(28)
17(9) 2(5) 3(4)
12(14) 19(22) 3(3)
5(5) 202(166) 2(2)
2(0)
Chorro St
2
1(2)
1(4)
137(64) 620(481) 23(40)
46(54) 37(39) 23(37)
13(48)
Chorro St
1
16(21) 231(288) 12(34)
AM(PM)
AM(PM)
62(52) 45(41) 133(182)
3(6)
2(6) 5(2) 2(5)
19(25) 19(33) 12(11)
51(59) 336(684) 35(38)
15(34)
Foothill Blvd
3(5) Murray Ave
9(25)
[27
) 03
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan N
N OL C LIN
ST
A
UT LN
ST
NOT TO SCALE
W
Chorro St
Chorro St
1(3) Broad St
Chorro St
3(3)
Palm St
17
15(12) 29(43) 6(12)
0(0)
ST
Palm St
16
44(50) 84(76) 145(136)
91(175) 9(22) 42(50)
38(95) 62(66) 22(9)
[9]
m
LM
11(25) 38(110) 3(12) 0(2)
6)
]
26
T
3(4)
(1
)[8
8]
2 (1
[11
]
HS
4(12)
28(22) 138(169) 12(24)
9)
ST
96
ph
28
AC
11(23) 159(234) 4(3)
21(28)
10(8)
15(5)
(8
28
AD
)[2
03
(2
] )[0 (0
27
14
)[1
5
8]
1(1)
16
1 7(
7
]
)[5
(0
ph
m
PE
6(8)
Mill St
15
37(6) 21(11) 13(7)
62(56) 76(76) 73(88)
ST
7 7(
98
Y RE
2] )[7 5 4 2( 68
ST
TE
N MO
NI M PO
A AZ PL
O ST
RA
ST
LEGEND
E
GU
Signalized Intersection
HI
Stop Controlled Intersection XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Auto Segment Volumes
XXX(YYY)[ZZZ]
Daily(AM Peak Hour)[PM Peak Hour] Bike Segment Volumes
XX mph
85th Percentile Vehicle Speeds
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
XX(YY)
AM(PM) Peak Hour Pedestrian Crossing Volumes
D
OA
BR ST
Note: Traffic count data collected during a typical weekday (Tues, Wed, Thurs) with schools in session during 2014 and 2016. Peak hour volumes reflect the highest hourly volume during the AM (7-9 AM) and PM (3:30-6:00 PM) periods.
Existing Traffic Volumes - South Segment
4(4)
09
[1 3)
I SS I M
TE N MO
4(2)
O
]
39(42) 185(196) 67(23)
RR
ST
] 74
O
0]
[26
T LS
ON
Y RE
5(4) 205(342) 24(10)
ST
17(9)
28(85) 29(30) 14(17)
PA
17
ST
Peach St
14
88(129) 7(11) 19(16)
MO
R OR
) 88
)[2 03 (2 94 26
CH (2
80
30
L MI
11(37) 12(11) 1(3)
1
9(
9 11
15
11
O BR
51
15
101
28
[1
) 05
7(7)
OS
OS
]
14
10(12) 237(514) 0(1)
] [27
ph
PE
Walnut St
13
1(4) 1(0) 2(0)
0(0)
0(0)
ph
m
]
5) (1
0 )[2
ST
70(143) 1(1) 6(19)
9(11) 42(19) 250(233) 17(9)
35
(31
m 36
H AC
53(16) 14(4) 338(255) 113(69)
44(16) 382(325) 1(0)
13
Chorro St
5(11)
For an ideal bicycle boulevard, traffic volumes should be 1,500 vehicles per day (veh/day) or less to provide a comfortable, low‐stress environment for cyclists of all ability levels, although volumes up to 3,000 veh/day can be accommodated. When volumes exceed 3,000 veh/day, a shared facility (vehicles and bikes share the travelway) is likely to be uncomfortable for less‐ experienced riders. North of Lincoln Street, Broad Street traffic volumes are currently 500‐2,000 veh/day above the maximum daily volume range recommended for a bicycle boulevard. Existing volume data suggests that volume management design strategies (i.e. traffic diverters, partial closures, etc.) should be considered for the bicycle boulevard to facilitate a low‐stress bicycling environment.
Streets developed as bicycle boulevards should have prevailing motor vehicle speeds (85th percentile speeds) of 25 mph or less, with 20 mph preferred to provide a low‐street bicycling environment. Speed surveys were conducted along several segments of the Broad Street corridor: between Monterey Street and US 101; between Lincoln Street and Mission Street; and between Mission Street and Ramona Drive. Throughout the corridor, prevailing speeds exceeded the ideal range for a bicycle boulevard, particularly between Mission Street and Lincoln Street where prevailing speeds were nearly 10 mph above the ideal level. Existing data suggests that speed management design strategies (i.e. traffic circles, speed humps, neckdowns/lane narrowing, etc.) should be considered for the bicycle boulevard to provide a low‐stress bicycling environment.
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan RO OR CH
1
ST
N
Pacheco Elementary
California Polytechnic State University
N
I RD FERRIN
PATRICIA DR
Bishop's Peak Elementary
PLANNED CERRO ROMAULDO BICYCLE BOULEVARD
CERRO ROMAULDO AVE
NOT TO SCALE
FOOTHILL BLVD
OR A
NI
Santa Rosa Park
O ST
ST
Creek
Old Garden Creek
D
OA
BR
R CENTE
IL M
ST
ST
ST
OA ST
R TE
ON
M
O ST
ST
Planning Area Context and Bicycle Connectivity
A ER U G HI
RR
RO OR
Mission Plaza
EY
ST
MO
Mission College Prep. School
CH
Bicycle Boulevard
ST
P
Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane) Class III Bikeway (Bike Route)
Downtown San Luis Obispo
M AL
D
Old Mission School
OS
H AC PE
BR
Class I Bikeway (Bike Path)
ST
W
L
LEGEND
ST
SA
AL
T NU
RO
LIN
A
Community Garden
T
NS
L CO
OS
PROPOSED LONG-TERM CLOSURE OF US 101/ BROAD ST RAMPS AND CONSTRUCTION OF GRADE-SEPARATED BIKE/PED CROSSING OF US 101
VIEW TAIN
NT SA
N MOU Lincoln Deli
101
Stenner
N ST
MISSIO
PLANNED BROAD ST. BICYCLE BOULEVARD
VD
MURRAY AVE
BISHOP'S PEAK/PACHECO ELEMENTARY SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS WILL EXPLORE BIKE/PED CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS TO IMPROVE CONNECTIVITY ACROSS FOOTHILL BLVD.
H E D F ROM S C HOO L S
BL
/ B IK ES
MEINECKE AVE
CHORR
WA LK
LIF
LE
CA
MI
The Villages
BROAD ST
2-
TASSAJARA DR
LA ENTRADA
1/
RAMONA DR
ST M
A
H RS
ST San Luis Obispo Creek
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Plan N NOT TO SCALE
AD
ST
O
BR
C LIN
CHORRO STREET UNDERCROSSING OF US 101
ST
ER ST
Recommended street light pole spacing for this type of street is every 200-250' per City Engineering Standards
N ST
MISSIO
MURRAY AVE
MEINECKE AVE
BENTON WY
1
NT
RRO CHO
250'
10
CE
FOOTHILL BLVD
CURB RAMPS NOT PROVIDED AT MANY CROSSINGS ALONG BROAD ST
T NS OL
Street Lighting
D OA
ST
BR
EXISTING BROAD ST/US 101 RAMPS FUTURE GRADE-SEPARATED BIKE/PED CROSSING
BROAD ST
NL
IO
SS
MI N
SERRANO
RAMONA DR
LEGEND Existing Sidewalk No Sidewalk Provided Existing Curb Ramp Existing Speed Humps Existing Street Lighting Marked Crosswalk
EXISTING SPEED HUMPS
Existing Pedestrian Facilities - North Segment
EXISTING SHARED LANE MARKINGS ("SHARROWS")
