Brown Bark Park Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
Brown Bark Park Stream Restoration Monitoring Report EEP Project # 52 Monitoring Year – 05 2009
Submitted to:
NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
December 2009
Moniitoring Firrm
Landmark Center L C II, Suite S 220 4601 Six S Forks Rooad Raleiggh, NC 27609 Phone: (919) 278-22514 Fax: (919) 783-92266 Project Con P ntact: Adam m Spiller Email: adaam.spiller@k kci.com K Projectt No: 120710067B_BB KCI
Dessign Firm
Brown Bark Park P EEP Project # 52
KCI Associates of North Carolina C 2009 - MY05
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT .....................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................2 3.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................2
APPENDIX A – GENERAL FIGURES AND PLAN VIEW Figure 1. Figure 2.
Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................4 Current Condition Plan View...............................................................................5 APPENDIX B – GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4.
Project Restoration Components..........................................................................9 Project Activity and Reporting History ...............................................................9 Project Contacts Table .........................................................................................10 Project Attribute Table.........................................................................................10 APPENDIX C – VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table ..........................................12 Table 6. Planted Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot....................................12 Table 7. Planted Stem Density by Plot ..............................................................................12 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .............................................................................................13 APPENDIX D – STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA Stream Station Photos ..................................................................................................................15 Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment ........................................................23 Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events ...........................................................................23 Cross-Section Plots Longitudinal Profile Plot Pebble Count Plots
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
1.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
In 2004, the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) conducted stream restoration at Brown Bark Park within the Buffalo Creek Watershed in Greensboro, North Carolina. The 0.3-mi2 watershed is located within the USGS 14-digit HUC 03030002020040 and the NCDWQ Sub-basin 03-06-02 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The project restored approximately 2,834 linear feet of channel. Project construction occurred in 2004. The project goals and objectives are listed below. • • • • •
Restore unstable stream channel to natural stable form by modifying dimension, pattern, and/or profile based on reference reach parameters. Improve floodplain functionality by matching bankfull stage with floodplain elevation. Establish native floodplain vegetation through a forested riparian buffer. Improve the natural aesthetics of the stream corridor. Obtain mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts to streams within the same Hydrologic Unit Code.
The riparian buffer was planted with seven different species of bare root trees and four different species of live stakes. Three vegetation monitoring plots were established during the as-built survey: two buffer plots, each approximately 25’ x 100’, and one live stake plot, approximately 175’ x 5’. The fifth year of monitoring found an average of 279 stems per acre in the buffer plots, and 2,639 stems per acre in the live stake plot. Due to the urban nature of the project, there are several exotic species that are present at the project site. These species include mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), white mulberry (Morus alba), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), ornamental pear (Pyrus calleryana), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and porcelainberry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata). The invasive species listed do not exist in dense, dominant patches, they are scattered and are generally low in number. EEP has indicated that the City of Greensboro is taking over invasive control moving forward into stewardship. The fifth year monitoring found the vegetation component of the project to be on track to meeting the success criteria. Although the vegetation plots met the success criteria, the longer, narrow nature of the buffer in combination with plot placement made for 10-15 foot wide strips at various places within the buffer that exhibited lower woody stem densities and were subject to supplemental planting in late winter 2009/2010. These areas were mainly between the benching and upland zones. The total acreage subject to supplemental planting was approximately 0.9 acres. The plants were larger caliper material, 3 years in age, 5-10 gallon containerized with substantial root mass. EEP plans to observe these stems and summarize survival for 1 or 2 more growing seasons before offering the project for final closeout. The stream assessment completed during the fifth year of monitoring found the stream to be functioning for the majority of the project. Longitudinal profile and channel dimensions have changed minimally from the as-built conditions. The majority of the in-stream structures are functioning and some previously documented areas of erosion have stabilized with vegetation. Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on the EEPs website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available upon request.
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
1
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
2.0
METHODOLOGY
The EEP 2004 Stem Counting Protocol was used to collect vegetation data from Brown Bark Park this year, the fifth year of monitoring.
3.0
REFERENCES
Weakley, A S. 2006. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas. (http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeakleyFlora_2006-Jan.pdf)
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
2
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Appendix A General Figures and Plan Views
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
3
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
DIRECTIONS TO BROWN BARK PARK SITE: From Interstate 40, take exit 41 and continue north on E. Lee St. Bear right onto Hackett St. then turn left onto Gorrell St. Bear right onto US-220 N. (O’Henry Blvd.) Turn onto US-70 W. (E. Wendover Ave.) Turn right onto Benjamin Pkwy, and then continue straight onto Joseph M Bryan Blvd. Turn left onto Westridge Rd., and then left onto Westminster Dr. Turn right onto Brown Bark Dr. and the park will be on your right.
US-220
Westridge Rd.
Westminister Dr.
Project Location
Brown Bark Dr.
W. Friendly Ave.
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Brown Bark Park, Guilford County, EEP Project # 52 0.25 0.125
0
0.25
0.5 Miles
-
Appendix B General Project Tables
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
8
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Type
Approach
Linear Feet
Segment / Reach ID Reach I
Existing Linear Feet
Table 1. Project Restoration Components Project Number and Name: 52 - Brown Bark Park
2,834
R
P2/3
2,834
R = Restoration
Stationing 10+00 - 38+34
Comment
P2/3 = Combination of Priority 2 and 3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Project Number and Name: 52 - Brown Bark Park
Activity or Report Restoration Plan Permits Final Design - 90% Construction Stream Repair and Maintenance Seeding As-Built Report Year 1 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
Data Collection Complete
2005 Nov 05 Sep 06 Aug 07 Nov 08 Nov 09
9
Actual Completion or Delivery Jun 02 Jun 02 Aug 04 Apr 05 Jun 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Dec 09
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Table 3. Project Contacts Table Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Buck Engineering Design Firm 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, North Carolina 27511 Contact: Mr. Mike Rooney Phone: (919) 463-5488 Fax: (919) 463-5490 Shamrock Construction Construction Contractor P.O. Box 14987 Greensboro, North Carolina 27415 Contact: Mr. Bill Wright Phone: (336) 375-1989 Fax: (336) 375-1801 Monitoring Performers Buck Engineering MY-01 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, North Carolina 27511 Contact: Mr. Mike Rooney Phone: (919) 463-5488 Fax: (919) 463-5490 KCI Associates of NC MY-02, 03, 04, 05 Landmark Center, II Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Phone: (919) 278-2514 Fax: (919) 783-9266
Table 4. Project Attribute Table Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Project County Drainage Area Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate (%) Stream Order Physiographic Region Ecoregion Rosgen Classification of As-built Dominant Soil Types Reference Site ID USGS HUC for Project and Reference NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and Reference NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference Any portion of the project segment 303(d) listed? Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303(d) listed segment? Reasons for 303(d) Listing or Stressor % of Project Easement Fenced % of Project Easement Demarcated with Bollards Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
10
Guilford County 0.3 sq. mi. 32% First Order Piedmont Southern Outer Piedmont B5/C5 Cecil-Urban land complex (Brown Bark) N/A 03030002020040 (Brown Bark) 03-06-02 (Brown Bark) N/A (Brown Bark) No - not rated No N/A 0% 100% KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
11
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation S ucces s S ummary Table Project Number and Name: 52 - Brown Bark Park
1
Monitoring Year 05 Planted S tem Dens ity (s tems /acre) 279
Vegetation S urvival Thres hold Met? Yes
2
279
Yes
Live Stake Plot
2,639
Yes
Vegetation Plot ID
Table 6. Planted Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Buffer Plot Live Stake Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 1 2 Species Plot Totals Totals Totals Totals Totals Totals Shrubs Cornus amomum 26 26 26 26 26 Sambucus canadensis 7 7 7 7 7 Trees Quercus phellos 1 1 1 1 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3 4 3 3 3 Nyssa sylvatica 5 9 14 14 14 14 Betula nigra 1 3 5 4 4 4 Cornus florida 1 1 1 1 1 Hamamelis virginiana 9 11 11 9 9 Salix nigra 6 6 6 6 6 Salix sericea 22 25 22 22 22 Total 16 16 61 179 127 100 95 93 93
Survival %* N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 52%
*The survival percentage for each species is unknown because the as-built and first year monitoring data are not available.
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
1 3
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Salix sericea
Silky Willow
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Cornus florida
Flowering Dogwood
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Betula nigra
River Birch
Nyssa sylvatica 5 9
1 1 26
7
12
22
6
Density (Trees/Acre)
3
Total (Year 5)
9
Black Gum
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Hamamelis virginiana
Plot # 1 2 LS
Witch Hazel
Table 7. Planted Stem Density By Plot Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Crew : B. Roberts
16 16 61
279 279 3,037
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 Photo – Taken from Photo Point #3 Buffer Plot #1 and the Live Stake Plot are on the left side of the stream. 11/3/09 - MY 05
Plot 2 Photo – Taken from Photo Point #28 Buffer Plot #2 is on the left side of the stream. 11/3/09 - MY 05 Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
13
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Appendix D Stream Assessment Data
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
14
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Stream Station Photos
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#1 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#2 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#3 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#4 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#5 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#6 – MY05 – 11/3/09 15
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#7 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#8 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#9 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#10 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#11 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#12 – MY05 – 11/3/09
16
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#13 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#14 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#15 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#16 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#17 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#18 – MY05 – 11/3/09 17
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
PP#19A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#19B – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#20A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#20B – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#21A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#21B – MY05 – 11/3/09
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
18
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#22 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#23 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#24 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#25 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#26 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#27 – MY05 – 11/3/09 19
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
PP#28 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#29A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#29B – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#30 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#31 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#32 – MY05 – 11/3/09
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
20
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#33 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#34 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#35 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#36 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#37 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#38 – MY05 – 11/3/09 21
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#39 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#40 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#41 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#42 – MY05 – 11/3/09
22
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Table 8. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park (# Stable) Number Performing as Intended
Total Number per As-built *
44 44 44 43 37 49
52 52 52 52 52 50
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
85% 85% 85% 83% 71% 98%
49
50
N/A
98%
49 13 10
50 14 14
N/A N/A N/A
98% 93% 71%
14
14
N/A
100%
0
0
N/A
N/A
** 14
** 14
N/A N/A
N/A 100%
N/A
N/A
2/15
99%
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
1. Free of back or arm scour? 2. Height appropriate? 3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate? 4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6
N/A N/A N/A N/A
100% 100% 100% 100%
1. Free of scour?
17
18
N/A
94%
2. Footing stable? 17 18 *Total number of features per as-built estimated from as-built profile and planview sheets. **Rc of design unknown
N/A
94%
Feature Category
Metric (per As-built and reference baselines)
A. Riffles
1. Present? 2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)? 3. Facet grade appears stable? 4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining? 5. Length appropriate? B. Pools 1. Present? (e.g. no severe aggradation) 2. Sufficiently deep (Dmax pool:Mean Bkf > 1.6?) 3. Length appropriate? C. Thalweg 1. Upstream of meander bend centering? 2. Downstream of meander centering? D. Meanders 1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion? 2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation? 3. Apparent Rc within spec? 4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief? E. Bed General 1.General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation) 2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down cutting or head cutting? F. Bank 1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank G. Vanes
H. Wads / Boulders
Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Date of Data Date of Occurrence Collection 9/18/2006 9/18/2006 8/17/2007 4/15/2007 11/15/2007 10/26/2007 11/5/2008 8/27/2008 11/9/2009 6/5/2009 11/25/2009 11/13/2009
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
Total Number / % Perform. in feet in unstable Stable state Condition
Method
Photo Number
On site Crest gauge Crest gauge Crest gauge Evaluation of rainfall data Evaluation of rainfall data
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
23
Feature Perform. Mean or Total
82%
98% 82%
100%
99% 100%
100%
94%
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05 - Final
Station 0.0 0.3 2.4 5.7 12.9 19.0 23.6 30.6 30.6 31.1 31.4 31.5 32.2 32.9 34.0 34.3 34.9 35.6 38.7 46.3 48.8 53.8 58.9
Elevation 868.72 868.72 868.21 867.69 866.24 864.60 862.46 861.49 861.18 860.91 860.41 860.32 860.35 860.41 860.45 860.55 861.12 861.54 862.20 866.08 866.73 867.16 867.20
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 858
863
868
873
0
10
861.7 5.4 7.2 863.1 18 1.4 0.8 9.8 2.5 1.0
20
30 Station (feet)
40
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 1, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 1, Riffle 0.3 7/27/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter
Cross-Section Plots
50
MY-05, 7/27/09
MY-04, 9/17/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
60
Station 0.0 3.9 6.6 12.6 15.8 21.9 26.5 27.9 28.2 28.4 28.8 29.2 29.8 30.5 30.8 31.6 32.1 36.3 39.3 44.6 46.6 50.5 55.0 59.2
Elevation 861.95 861.41 861.09 860.91 860.54 859.03 858.34 857.67 857.15 856.90 856.76 856.85 856.95 857.02 857.07 857.19 857.71 858.02 858.34 858.28 858.55 859.56 860.75 861.03
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 852
857
862
867
0
10
858.4 9.2 13.2 860.0 35 1.6 0.7 19.2 2.6 1.0
20
30 Station (feet)
40
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 2, Pool
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 2, Pool 0.3 7/28/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter
50
MY-05, 7/28/09
MY-04, 9/18/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
60
Station 0.0 4.0 10.0 12.9 22.3 23.7 26.6 27.2 27.9 28.5 29.4 29.6 30.0 30.3 30.6 30.9 32.6 33.1 35.6 39.1 46.5 48.4 50.8
Elevation 860.12 859.72 858.74 858.42 856.22 855.99 855.59 854.13 854.09 853.58 853.50 853.34 853.16 853.13 853.46 853.42 854.76 854.78 856.13 856.25 858.54 858.90 859.03
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 852
857
862
867
0
10
855.7 12.3 9.0 858.3 32 2.6 1.4 6.6 3.6 1.0
20
30 Station (feet)
40
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 3, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 3, Riffle 0.3 7/29/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter
50
MY-05, 7/29/09
MY-04, 9/24/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
60
Station 0.0 4.3 10.7 15.8 19.1 21.3 24.0 26.0 28.7 30.2 32.2 33.0 34.5 36.6 37.6 37.8 38.2 40.6 44.8 46.7 52.2 55.3 65.7 71.3
Elevation 849.12 849.23 848.54 847.99 847.38 846.82 845.43 844.28 844.34 844.19 843.24 841.68 841.64 842.02 842.28 842.43 843.44 843.76 844.13 844.47 846.94 847.66 848.74 849.23
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 840
845
850
855
0
10
843.3 7.8 6.1 845.1 23 1.7 1.3 4.7 3.8 1.0
20
30
40 Station (feet)
50
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 4, Pool
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 4, Pool 0.3 7/31/2009 B. Roberts, K. Knight-Meng
60
70
MY-05, 7/29/09
MY-04, 9/30/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
Station 0.0 1.9 11.8 19.0 29.5 35.6 44.6 52.4 54.7 56.5 58.1 59.0 60.8 61.6 62.1 62.8 66.9 72.9 79.0 83.2 94.3 103.8
Elevation 843.63 843.39 843.01 842.79 842.12 841.59 840.99 840.53 840.07 838.99 838.87 838.95 839.10 839.17 839.84 840.31 841.10 841.62 842.34 842.95 844.50 845.77
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 835
840
845
850
0
10
840.3 8.7 9.2 841.7 40 1.5 0.9 9.8 4.3 1.0
20
30
40
50 60 Station (feet)
70
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 5, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 5, Riffle 0.3 8/5/2009 B. Roberts, A. Davis
80
90
100
MY-05, 8/5/09
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
Station 0.0 1.4 3.6 7.8 11.5 15.8 20.0 23.1 25.8 27.5 29.1 29.9 31.4 32.3 33.2 33.9 34.8 36.3 37.9 40.3 46.6 52.8 58.5 64.5 74.7 77.8 80.6
Elevation 843.94 843.84 843.64 843.04 842.37 841.67 841.02 840.56 840.00 839.72 838.99 838.22 838.13 838.02 837.97 837.99 838.97 839.60 839.78 839.80 839.88 840.45 840.97 841.31 842.31 842.73 843.05
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 835
840
845
850
0
10
839.6 8.8 8.6 841.2 45 1.6 1.0 8.4 5.2 1.0
20
30
40 Station (feet)
50
60
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 6, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 6, Riffle 0.3 8/5/2009 B. Roberts, A. Davis
70
80
MY-05, 8/5/2009
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
Longitudinal Profile Brown Bark Park EEP Project Number 52 - MY05 Stations 10+00 - 20+00 865
863
SBKF = -0.0077x + 871.3 861
859
857
SWS = -0.0082x + 870.77
ELEVATION (FT)
855
853
851
849
847
845
843
841
839
837
835 1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
STATION (FT) ( ) As-Built
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-05, 8/4/09
Bankfull
Water Surface
In-stream Structures
BKF Slope
WS Slope
g Longitudinal Profile Brown Bark Park EEP Project Number 52 - MY05 Stations 20+00 - 30+00
865
863
861
859
SBKF = -0.0106x + 876.26 857
ELEVATIION (FT)
855
853
851
Bedrock Drop
849
SBKF = -0.0071x + 864.21 847
SWS = -0.0114x + 876.81 845
843
841
839
SWS = -0.0087x + 867.73 837
835 2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
STATION (FT) As-Built
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-05, 8/4/09
Bankfull
Water Surface
In-stream Structures
BKF Slope
WS Slope
Longitudinal Profile Brown Bro n Bark Park EEP Project Number 52 - MY05 Stations 30+00 - 40+00
865
863
861
859
857
ELEVAT TION (FT)
855
853
851
849
847
SBKF = -0.0033x + 852.95 845
843
SBKF = -0.0076x + 867.29 841
839
SWS = -0.0022x + 848.62 837
SWS = -0.0076x + 866.12 835 3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
STATION (FT)
As-Built
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-05, 8/5/09
Bankfull
Water Surface
In-stream Structures
WS Slope
BKF Slope
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
101
10 2 4 8 11 6 7 16 7 7 2 1 6 8 5 1
Cross-Section 1 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
2 6.1 12 17 80 140
Size (mm)
0.01
5 6 17 4 2 3 3 11 15 10 8 4 5 1 3 10 100 Particle Size - Millimeters 3 3 Size Distribution mean 12.6 dispersion 6.3 skewness 0.02
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 1 Riffle
Pebble Count Plots
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 16% 64% 20% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
100
13 4 7 6 17 22 12 11 2 1
5
Cross-Section 2 Pool - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 1.8 8 11 14 21 30
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 6.1 dispersion 4.0 skewness -0.24
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 2 Pool
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 18% 82% 0% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
16 107
1 8 6 11 4 9 5 10 8 3 2 2 3 6 9 2 2
Cross-Section 3 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 1.9 6.4 12 20 120 180
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 15.1 dispersion 8.2 skewness 0.07
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 3 Riffle
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 14% 50% 19% 2% 15%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
90
13 5 7 3 12 14 10 10 8 7 1
Cross-Section 4 Pool - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 2.4 8.8 13 18 34 54
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 9.0 dispersion 4.0 skewness -0.15
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 4 Pool
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 14% 84% 1% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
100
1 6 12 10 2
3 3 1 2 5 7 3 11 10 13 11
Cross-Section 5 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 4.5 11 18 28 110 160
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 28.3 dispersion 4.3 skewness 0.26
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 5 Riffle
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 0% 72% 28% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Cross-Section 6 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C Very Fine .062 - .125 S Fine .125 - .25 A Medium .25 - .50 N Coarse .50 - 1 D Very Coarse 1-2 S Very Fine 2-4 5 Fine 4 - 5.7 G 10 Fine 5.7 - 8 R 1 Medium 8 - 11.3 A 19 Medium 11.3 - 16 V 17 Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 11 Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 7 Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 1 Very Coarse 45 - 64 1 Small 64 - 90 C 9 Small 90 - 128 O 10 g Large 128 - 180 B 7 Large 180 - 256 L 2 Small 256 - 362 B Small 362 - 512 L Medium 512 - 1024 D Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 R Bedrock >2048 BDRK Total 100 Note: % Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
8 11 15 24 100 160
Size (mm)
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 28.3 dispersion 4.3 skewness 0.26
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 6 Riffle
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 0% 72% 28% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Submitted to:
NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
December 2009
Moniitoring Firrm
Landmark Center L C II, Suite S 220 4601 Six S Forks Rooad Raleiggh, NC 27609 Phone: (919) 278-22514 Fax: (919) 783-92266 Project Con P ntact: Adam m Spiller Email: adaam.spiller@k kci.com K Projectt No: 120710067B_BB KCI
Dessign Firm
Brown Bark Park P EEP Project # 52
KCI Associates of North Carolina C 2009 - MY05
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT .....................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................2 3.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................2
APPENDIX A – GENERAL FIGURES AND PLAN VIEW Figure 1. Figure 2.
Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................4 Current Condition Plan View...............................................................................5 APPENDIX B – GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4.
Project Restoration Components..........................................................................9 Project Activity and Reporting History ...............................................................9 Project Contacts Table .........................................................................................10 Project Attribute Table.........................................................................................10 APPENDIX C – VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table ..........................................12 Table 6. Planted Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot....................................12 Table 7. Planted Stem Density by Plot ..............................................................................12 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .............................................................................................13 APPENDIX D – STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA Stream Station Photos ..................................................................................................................15 Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment ........................................................23 Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events ...........................................................................23 Cross-Section Plots Longitudinal Profile Plot Pebble Count Plots
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
1.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
In 2004, the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) conducted stream restoration at Brown Bark Park within the Buffalo Creek Watershed in Greensboro, North Carolina. The 0.3-mi2 watershed is located within the USGS 14-digit HUC 03030002020040 and the NCDWQ Sub-basin 03-06-02 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The project restored approximately 2,834 linear feet of channel. Project construction occurred in 2004. The project goals and objectives are listed below. • • • • •
Restore unstable stream channel to natural stable form by modifying dimension, pattern, and/or profile based on reference reach parameters. Improve floodplain functionality by matching bankfull stage with floodplain elevation. Establish native floodplain vegetation through a forested riparian buffer. Improve the natural aesthetics of the stream corridor. Obtain mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts to streams within the same Hydrologic Unit Code.
The riparian buffer was planted with seven different species of bare root trees and four different species of live stakes. Three vegetation monitoring plots were established during the as-built survey: two buffer plots, each approximately 25’ x 100’, and one live stake plot, approximately 175’ x 5’. The fifth year of monitoring found an average of 279 stems per acre in the buffer plots, and 2,639 stems per acre in the live stake plot. Due to the urban nature of the project, there are several exotic species that are present at the project site. These species include mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), white mulberry (Morus alba), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), ornamental pear (Pyrus calleryana), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and porcelainberry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata). The invasive species listed do not exist in dense, dominant patches, they are scattered and are generally low in number. EEP has indicated that the City of Greensboro is taking over invasive control moving forward into stewardship. The fifth year monitoring found the vegetation component of the project to be on track to meeting the success criteria. Although the vegetation plots met the success criteria, the longer, narrow nature of the buffer in combination with plot placement made for 10-15 foot wide strips at various places within the buffer that exhibited lower woody stem densities and were subject to supplemental planting in late winter 2009/2010. These areas were mainly between the benching and upland zones. The total acreage subject to supplemental planting was approximately 0.9 acres. The plants were larger caliper material, 3 years in age, 5-10 gallon containerized with substantial root mass. EEP plans to observe these stems and summarize survival for 1 or 2 more growing seasons before offering the project for final closeout. The stream assessment completed during the fifth year of monitoring found the stream to be functioning for the majority of the project. Longitudinal profile and channel dimensions have changed minimally from the as-built conditions. The majority of the in-stream structures are functioning and some previously documented areas of erosion have stabilized with vegetation. Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on the EEPs website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available upon request.
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
1
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
2.0
METHODOLOGY
The EEP 2004 Stem Counting Protocol was used to collect vegetation data from Brown Bark Park this year, the fifth year of monitoring.
3.0
REFERENCES
Weakley, A S. 2006. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas. (http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeakleyFlora_2006-Jan.pdf)
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
2
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Appendix A General Figures and Plan Views
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
3
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
DIRECTIONS TO BROWN BARK PARK SITE: From Interstate 40, take exit 41 and continue north on E. Lee St. Bear right onto Hackett St. then turn left onto Gorrell St. Bear right onto US-220 N. (O’Henry Blvd.) Turn onto US-70 W. (E. Wendover Ave.) Turn right onto Benjamin Pkwy, and then continue straight onto Joseph M Bryan Blvd. Turn left onto Westridge Rd., and then left onto Westminster Dr. Turn right onto Brown Bark Dr. and the park will be on your right.
US-220
Westridge Rd.
Westminister Dr.
Project Location
Brown Bark Dr.
W. Friendly Ave.
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Brown Bark Park, Guilford County, EEP Project # 52 0.25 0.125
0
0.25
0.5 Miles
-
Appendix B General Project Tables
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
8
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Type
Approach
Linear Feet
Segment / Reach ID Reach I
Existing Linear Feet
Table 1. Project Restoration Components Project Number and Name: 52 - Brown Bark Park
2,834
R
P2/3
2,834
R = Restoration
Stationing 10+00 - 38+34
Comment
P2/3 = Combination of Priority 2 and 3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Project Number and Name: 52 - Brown Bark Park
Activity or Report Restoration Plan Permits Final Design - 90% Construction Stream Repair and Maintenance Seeding As-Built Report Year 1 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
Data Collection Complete
2005 Nov 05 Sep 06 Aug 07 Nov 08 Nov 09
9
Actual Completion or Delivery Jun 02 Jun 02 Aug 04 Apr 05 Jun 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Dec 09
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Table 3. Project Contacts Table Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Buck Engineering Design Firm 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, North Carolina 27511 Contact: Mr. Mike Rooney Phone: (919) 463-5488 Fax: (919) 463-5490 Shamrock Construction Construction Contractor P.O. Box 14987 Greensboro, North Carolina 27415 Contact: Mr. Bill Wright Phone: (336) 375-1989 Fax: (336) 375-1801 Monitoring Performers Buck Engineering MY-01 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, North Carolina 27511 Contact: Mr. Mike Rooney Phone: (919) 463-5488 Fax: (919) 463-5490 KCI Associates of NC MY-02, 03, 04, 05 Landmark Center, II Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Phone: (919) 278-2514 Fax: (919) 783-9266
Table 4. Project Attribute Table Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Project County Drainage Area Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate (%) Stream Order Physiographic Region Ecoregion Rosgen Classification of As-built Dominant Soil Types Reference Site ID USGS HUC for Project and Reference NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and Reference NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference Any portion of the project segment 303(d) listed? Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303(d) listed segment? Reasons for 303(d) Listing or Stressor % of Project Easement Fenced % of Project Easement Demarcated with Bollards Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
10
Guilford County 0.3 sq. mi. 32% First Order Piedmont Southern Outer Piedmont B5/C5 Cecil-Urban land complex (Brown Bark) N/A 03030002020040 (Brown Bark) 03-06-02 (Brown Bark) N/A (Brown Bark) No - not rated No N/A 0% 100% KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
11
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation S ucces s S ummary Table Project Number and Name: 52 - Brown Bark Park
1
Monitoring Year 05 Planted S tem Dens ity (s tems /acre) 279
Vegetation S urvival Thres hold Met? Yes
2
279
Yes
Live Stake Plot
2,639
Yes
Vegetation Plot ID
Table 6. Planted Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Buffer Plot Live Stake Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 1 2 Species Plot Totals Totals Totals Totals Totals Totals Shrubs Cornus amomum 26 26 26 26 26 Sambucus canadensis 7 7 7 7 7 Trees Quercus phellos 1 1 1 1 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3 4 3 3 3 Nyssa sylvatica 5 9 14 14 14 14 Betula nigra 1 3 5 4 4 4 Cornus florida 1 1 1 1 1 Hamamelis virginiana 9 11 11 9 9 Salix nigra 6 6 6 6 6 Salix sericea 22 25 22 22 22 Total 16 16 61 179 127 100 95 93 93
Survival %* N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 52%
*The survival percentage for each species is unknown because the as-built and first year monitoring data are not available.
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
1 3
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Salix sericea
Silky Willow
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Cornus florida
Flowering Dogwood
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Betula nigra
River Birch
Nyssa sylvatica 5 9
1 1 26
7
12
22
6
Density (Trees/Acre)
3
Total (Year 5)
9
Black Gum
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Hamamelis virginiana
Plot # 1 2 LS
Witch Hazel
Table 7. Planted Stem Density By Plot Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Crew : B. Roberts
16 16 61
279 279 3,037
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 Photo – Taken from Photo Point #3 Buffer Plot #1 and the Live Stake Plot are on the left side of the stream. 11/3/09 - MY 05
Plot 2 Photo – Taken from Photo Point #28 Buffer Plot #2 is on the left side of the stream. 11/3/09 - MY 05 Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
13
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Appendix D Stream Assessment Data
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
14
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Stream Station Photos
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#1 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#2 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#3 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#4 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#5 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#6 – MY05 – 11/3/09 15
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#7 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#8 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#9 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#10 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#11 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#12 – MY05 – 11/3/09
16
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#13 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#14 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#15 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#16 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#17 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#18 – MY05 – 11/3/09 17
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
PP#19A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#19B – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#20A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#20B – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#21A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#21B – MY05 – 11/3/09
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
18
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#22 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#23 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#24 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#25 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#26 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#27 – MY05 – 11/3/09 19
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
PP#28 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#29A – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#29B – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#30 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#31 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#32 – MY05 – 11/3/09
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
20
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#33 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#34 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#35 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#36 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#37 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#38 – MY05 – 11/3/09 21
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
PP#39 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#40 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#41 – MY05 – 11/3/09
PP#42 – MY05 – 11/3/09
22
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05
Table 8. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park (# Stable) Number Performing as Intended
Total Number per As-built *
44 44 44 43 37 49
52 52 52 52 52 50
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
85% 85% 85% 83% 71% 98%
49
50
N/A
98%
49 13 10
50 14 14
N/A N/A N/A
98% 93% 71%
14
14
N/A
100%
0
0
N/A
N/A
** 14
** 14
N/A N/A
N/A 100%
N/A
N/A
2/15
99%
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
1. Free of back or arm scour? 2. Height appropriate? 3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate? 4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6
N/A N/A N/A N/A
100% 100% 100% 100%
1. Free of scour?
17
18
N/A
94%
2. Footing stable? 17 18 *Total number of features per as-built estimated from as-built profile and planview sheets. **Rc of design unknown
N/A
94%
Feature Category
Metric (per As-built and reference baselines)
A. Riffles
1. Present? 2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)? 3. Facet grade appears stable? 4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining? 5. Length appropriate? B. Pools 1. Present? (e.g. no severe aggradation) 2. Sufficiently deep (Dmax pool:Mean Bkf > 1.6?) 3. Length appropriate? C. Thalweg 1. Upstream of meander bend centering? 2. Downstream of meander centering? D. Meanders 1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion? 2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation? 3. Apparent Rc within spec? 4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief? E. Bed General 1.General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation) 2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down cutting or head cutting? F. Bank 1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank G. Vanes
H. Wads / Boulders
Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events Project Number and Name: 52 – Brown Bark Park Date of Data Date of Occurrence Collection 9/18/2006 9/18/2006 8/17/2007 4/15/2007 11/15/2007 10/26/2007 11/5/2008 8/27/2008 11/9/2009 6/5/2009 11/25/2009 11/13/2009
Brown Bark Park EEP Project # 52
Total Number / % Perform. in feet in unstable Stable state Condition
Method
Photo Number
On site Crest gauge Crest gauge Crest gauge Evaluation of rainfall data Evaluation of rainfall data
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
23
Feature Perform. Mean or Total
82%
98% 82%
100%
99% 100%
100%
94%
KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05 - Final
Station 0.0 0.3 2.4 5.7 12.9 19.0 23.6 30.6 30.6 31.1 31.4 31.5 32.2 32.9 34.0 34.3 34.9 35.6 38.7 46.3 48.8 53.8 58.9
Elevation 868.72 868.72 868.21 867.69 866.24 864.60 862.46 861.49 861.18 860.91 860.41 860.32 860.35 860.41 860.45 860.55 861.12 861.54 862.20 866.08 866.73 867.16 867.20
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 858
863
868
873
0
10
861.7 5.4 7.2 863.1 18 1.4 0.8 9.8 2.5 1.0
20
30 Station (feet)
40
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 1, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 1, Riffle 0.3 7/27/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter
Cross-Section Plots
50
MY-05, 7/27/09
MY-04, 9/17/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
60
Station 0.0 3.9 6.6 12.6 15.8 21.9 26.5 27.9 28.2 28.4 28.8 29.2 29.8 30.5 30.8 31.6 32.1 36.3 39.3 44.6 46.6 50.5 55.0 59.2
Elevation 861.95 861.41 861.09 860.91 860.54 859.03 858.34 857.67 857.15 856.90 856.76 856.85 856.95 857.02 857.07 857.19 857.71 858.02 858.34 858.28 858.55 859.56 860.75 861.03
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 852
857
862
867
0
10
858.4 9.2 13.2 860.0 35 1.6 0.7 19.2 2.6 1.0
20
30 Station (feet)
40
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 2, Pool
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 2, Pool 0.3 7/28/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter
50
MY-05, 7/28/09
MY-04, 9/18/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
60
Station 0.0 4.0 10.0 12.9 22.3 23.7 26.6 27.2 27.9 28.5 29.4 29.6 30.0 30.3 30.6 30.9 32.6 33.1 35.6 39.1 46.5 48.4 50.8
Elevation 860.12 859.72 858.74 858.42 856.22 855.99 855.59 854.13 854.09 853.58 853.50 853.34 853.16 853.13 853.46 853.42 854.76 854.78 856.13 856.25 858.54 858.90 859.03
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 852
857
862
867
0
10
855.7 12.3 9.0 858.3 32 2.6 1.4 6.6 3.6 1.0
20
30 Station (feet)
40
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 3, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 3, Riffle 0.3 7/29/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter
50
MY-05, 7/29/09
MY-04, 9/24/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
60
Station 0.0 4.3 10.7 15.8 19.1 21.3 24.0 26.0 28.7 30.2 32.2 33.0 34.5 36.6 37.6 37.8 38.2 40.6 44.8 46.7 52.2 55.3 65.7 71.3
Elevation 849.12 849.23 848.54 847.99 847.38 846.82 845.43 844.28 844.34 844.19 843.24 841.68 841.64 842.02 842.28 842.43 843.44 843.76 844.13 844.47 846.94 847.66 848.74 849.23
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 840
845
850
855
0
10
843.3 7.8 6.1 845.1 23 1.7 1.3 4.7 3.8 1.0
20
30
40 Station (feet)
50
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 4, Pool
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 4, Pool 0.3 7/31/2009 B. Roberts, K. Knight-Meng
60
70
MY-05, 7/29/09
MY-04, 9/30/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
Station 0.0 1.9 11.8 19.0 29.5 35.6 44.6 52.4 54.7 56.5 58.1 59.0 60.8 61.6 62.1 62.8 66.9 72.9 79.0 83.2 94.3 103.8
Elevation 843.63 843.39 843.01 842.79 842.12 841.59 840.99 840.53 840.07 838.99 838.87 838.95 839.10 839.17 839.84 840.31 841.10 841.62 842.34 842.95 844.50 845.77
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 835
840
845
850
0
10
840.3 8.7 9.2 841.7 40 1.5 0.9 9.8 4.3 1.0
20
30
40
50 60 Station (feet)
70
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 5, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 5, Riffle 0.3 8/5/2009 B. Roberts, A. Davis
80
90
100
MY-05, 8/5/09
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
Station 0.0 1.4 3.6 7.8 11.5 15.8 20.0 23.1 25.8 27.5 29.1 29.9 31.4 32.3 33.2 33.9 34.8 36.3 37.9 40.3 46.6 52.8 58.5 64.5 74.7 77.8 80.6
Elevation 843.94 843.84 843.64 843.04 842.37 841.67 841.02 840.56 840.00 839.72 838.99 838.22 838.13 838.02 837.97 837.99 838.97 839.60 839.78 839.80 839.88 840.45 840.97 841.31 842.31 842.73 843.05
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:
Elevation (feet) 835
840
845
850
0
10
839.6 8.8 8.6 841.2 45 1.6 1.0 8.4 5.2 1.0
20
30
40 Station (feet)
50
60
Cape Fear River Basin, Brown Bark Park, MY05, XS - 6, Riffle
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
Cape Fear Brown Bark Park, MY05 XS - 6, Riffle 0.3 8/5/2009 B. Roberts, A. Davis
70
80
MY-05, 8/5/2009
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-01
As-Built
Flood Prone Area
Bankfull
Longitudinal Profile Brown Bark Park EEP Project Number 52 - MY05 Stations 10+00 - 20+00 865
863
SBKF = -0.0077x + 871.3 861
859
857
SWS = -0.0082x + 870.77
ELEVATION (FT)
855
853
851
849
847
845
843
841
839
837
835 1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
STATION (FT) ( ) As-Built
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-05, 8/4/09
Bankfull
Water Surface
In-stream Structures
BKF Slope
WS Slope
g Longitudinal Profile Brown Bark Park EEP Project Number 52 - MY05 Stations 20+00 - 30+00
865
863
861
859
SBKF = -0.0106x + 876.26 857
ELEVATIION (FT)
855
853
851
Bedrock Drop
849
SBKF = -0.0071x + 864.21 847
SWS = -0.0114x + 876.81 845
843
841
839
SWS = -0.0087x + 867.73 837
835 2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
STATION (FT) As-Built
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-05, 8/4/09
Bankfull
Water Surface
In-stream Structures
BKF Slope
WS Slope
Longitudinal Profile Brown Bro n Bark Park EEP Project Number 52 - MY05 Stations 30+00 - 40+00
865
863
861
859
857
ELEVAT TION (FT)
855
853
851
849
847
SBKF = -0.0033x + 852.95 845
843
SBKF = -0.0076x + 867.29 841
839
SWS = -0.0022x + 848.62 837
SWS = -0.0076x + 866.12 835 3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
STATION (FT)
As-Built
MY-02, 9/13/06
MY-03, 7/31/07
MY-04, 10/1/08
MY-05, 8/5/09
Bankfull
Water Surface
In-stream Structures
WS Slope
BKF Slope
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
101
10 2 4 8 11 6 7 16 7 7 2 1 6 8 5 1
Cross-Section 1 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
2 6.1 12 17 80 140
Size (mm)
0.01
5 6 17 4 2 3 3 11 15 10 8 4 5 1 3 10 100 Particle Size - Millimeters 3 3 Size Distribution mean 12.6 dispersion 6.3 skewness 0.02
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 1 Riffle
Pebble Count Plots
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 16% 64% 20% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
100
13 4 7 6 17 22 12 11 2 1
5
Cross-Section 2 Pool - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 1.8 8 11 14 21 30
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 6.1 dispersion 4.0 skewness -0.24
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 2 Pool
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 18% 82% 0% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
16 107
1 8 6 11 4 9 5 10 8 3 2 2 3 6 9 2 2
Cross-Section 3 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 1.9 6.4 12 20 120 180
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 15.1 dispersion 8.2 skewness 0.07
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 3 Riffle
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 14% 50% 19% 2% 15%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
90
13 5 7 3 12 14 10 10 8 7 1
Cross-Section 4 Pool - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 2.4 8.8 13 18 34 54
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 9.0 dispersion 4.0 skewness -0.15
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 4 Pool
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 14% 84% 1% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Note:
Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048 C O B L B L D R BDRK Total
G R A V E L S
S A N D S
100
1 6 12 10 2
3 3 1 2 5 7 3 11 10 13 11
Cross-Section 5 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay
% Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
Size (mm) 4.5 11 18 28 110 160
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 28.3 dispersion 4.3 skewness 0.26
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 5 Riffle
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 0% 72% 28% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
Cross-Section 6 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C Very Fine .062 - .125 S Fine .125 - .25 A Medium .25 - .50 N Coarse .50 - 1 D Very Coarse 1-2 S Very Fine 2-4 5 Fine 4 - 5.7 G 10 Fine 5.7 - 8 R 1 Medium 8 - 11.3 A 19 Medium 11.3 - 16 V 17 Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 11 Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 7 Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 1 Very Coarse 45 - 64 1 Small 64 - 90 C 9 Small 90 - 128 O 10 g Large 128 - 180 B 7 Large 180 - 256 L 2 Small 256 - 362 B Small 362 - 512 L Medium 512 - 1024 D Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 R Bedrock >2048 BDRK Total 100 Note: % Finer Than (Cumulative)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.1
8 11 15 24 100 160
Size (mm)
0.01
10
100
Size Distribution mean 28.3 dispersion 4.3 skewness 0.26
Particle Size - Millimeters
1
Particle Size Distribution Brown Bark Park XS 6 Riffle
1000
Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
10000
0% 0% 72% 28% 0%
MY05
MY04
MY03
MY02
