c e d K
I
K c e d
2 3
MAY 01 2017
4
LTG CRU Civil Rights
5 6
IRY)FOR.9 THE AWYDNISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, 'FOR A RUMAN RIGHTS 'COMMISSION HEARING
7 S. 9 1.0
WASHNGTON STATE RtMAN RIGHT'S OAR DooketNa_ COMMISSION, pregetiting the case in. support of the complgiiit filed by hinelfe-
OZ-ON-7- [f1f0_-
Harrisoo,
11 Complainant.,
CON-9ENT"DECOM'
V.
ij 14
(CLERX% ACTION' R'EQUMD)' SPIKFS.'FOOD:-MARTS INC.,
15 .16
17 19
L
1.1
JUDGMENT SVVMLkRY
Judgment Creditot-
'Washington State Human Rights Commission
-
19.
1.2 Judgment Debtor, 13 . Prin6pai Judgment Amount:
SPIKE' S- FOOD-MA.RT,'INC. $3,600
20,
1A
Total Judgment:
$3,000
21
1-5
Post Juftment Inte-rost Ratc'.:
12 :
1.6
Attoenq for Judgment Creditor
.4 pot
13
annum
CWia,Sta0ingP-Ala"flima AssiMant.Attorney. &neM
.24 25. U
2J
- Cotnp'lainagt
Washihgtah
State.
HumEin
Rights
Commhsion
(tho
"Coinmlssion % fiaVi)jg conducted an invi5stigEdoij and commenced this actign pur; cant to
CON9961T MMP,
Received Time Feb.13. 2017 3:18PM No.0217
ATrOMUr OIRMn OF WASHINGTON. civii Rig6a Elik. SOU' Fift Awnur, Stdtr. 2000 Swftic*A HIM, . (20,6) /42-4492
I
RM 49.60, the 'Washington Law Against, UseriminatioA, pres&ding#he case in support of the
2 , Complaint filed by Jimelle Harrison; and 3
Respondent -Spike's Food-mart Inc.. ('Spikq',9 Food-Mart" or '.Respondent"),
2.2
4. haVing. been served with the Ndfice of Hearing and Amended Complaint; and the Commission, 5 -appearing by, and through Its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney, General; and Chalia
6 7
Stallings-Alh'ilimaAssWant Money Q.,,-nual; and Respondent, appeating Pro 9e; and. 23
The Conu -nission and Respondent having agreed an 4;.basis fi6r the settlement -of
•8
the matters 4fleged ift the Amended Complaint and to the entry of "this Consent Decree against
9
Resp6ndent Without thd. b&O for hearhig or 4,udi'cation Of -any issue ofkw. or fact,;'-and
fo II
21.4,
Ile Commission and Respondent agree this. Consent Decree. does not constitute
pOddrice or an iidmis6on regarding the existence or •h6ri-existenee of any, Is.sue,. fact, or
12 violatio of any Jaw alleged by 6e- tommissioa with the, excepifion that kespotident. admits -to j 3 -the jurisdiction of this -Court;, and 14
2.5
'Respondent redo,gni2es, and, states that
15
voluntarily
1.6
General's ©I
and
this Consent Decree,ls
entered into
thAt no promises., represeatations, or threats: have been made by The. Attorney-
ce
or any member, officer, ages ox representative- tbereofto irzdueo it to enter-
17 into this Consent Decree, ek6tpt foe the promises and representations provided herein; .and 18 19 20 21
2.6
Respondent Waives any right it may have to appeal from this Consent Decree or
to otherwise contest the validity of this Consent Decree;, and 2.7,
Respondefit agkees, that it
will
not oppose the entry, of this Consent Decree on
the, ground it -fails to comply with CiVil Rule 65(d), and' hereby. waives, any objections based
22 ' thereon; and 23 24
2.8
Respondent further agrees its payments made• or due pursuant to this Consent
Decree are n6t am. enabk to discharge 'in bankruptcy,. and it. shall, not seek or -support th6ir
25 discharge in banlaWWy not oppose their being detennined not amenable to discharge, in 26 'barAmTtey., and 2
C014SENT DECM
Rece ved' Time Feb. 13,
2017
3:18PM No,0217
AT109MY OOMAL oF, wAsHmm ,w dy;I Kightr, [ink - 800`FiftA*=Oc. 5td"200 SaWde Wk 99104 (296)-40M.92
2.5
1
Respondent'.firther agrees its payments made or due pursuant 'to this Cohsent
2
Decree -are not pftferential transfers .of assets, :end it.alf A not make or supp6rt.-argunients to the
3
contrary ifi, bankruptcy court. or elsewhere.
4
The Couz% finding no j.pst'reason for delay;.
5
NOW,. MMFORt, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as.
6
follows: 21.0 This Court has jurisdiction of the -subject- matter of this action and of the pArties.
7
9 .Ihe Commission's Amended Complaint in this- matter. states -claims upon which. relief may be, 9
granted tw&r the WastAngton Law A*st))iscrimfnatioti,.P-CW49.60.
10'
'2.11 This Consent Decree finally resolves a
K c e d
2 3
MAY 01 2017
4
LTG CRU Civil Rights
5 6
IRY)FOR.9 THE AWYDNISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, 'FOR A RUMAN RIGHTS 'COMMISSION HEARING
7 S. 9 1.0
WASHNGTON STATE RtMAN RIGHT'S OAR DooketNa_ COMMISSION, pregetiting the case in. support of the complgiiit filed by hinelfe-
OZ-ON-7- [f1f0_-
Harrisoo,
11 Complainant.,
CON-9ENT"DECOM'
V.
ij 14
(CLERX% ACTION' R'EQUMD)' SPIKFS.'FOOD:-MARTS INC.,
15 .16
17 19
L
1.1
JUDGMENT SVVMLkRY
Judgment Creditot-
'Washington State Human Rights Commission
-
19.
1.2 Judgment Debtor, 13 . Prin6pai Judgment Amount:
SPIKE' S- FOOD-MA.RT,'INC. $3,600
20,
1A
Total Judgment:
$3,000
21
1-5
Post Juftment Inte-rost Ratc'.:
12 :
1.6
Attoenq for Judgment Creditor
.4 pot
13
annum
CWia,Sta0ingP-Ala"flima AssiMant.Attorney. &neM
.24 25. U
2J
- Cotnp'lainagt
Washihgtah
State.
HumEin
Rights
Commhsion
(tho
"Coinmlssion % fiaVi)jg conducted an invi5stigEdoij and commenced this actign pur; cant to
CON9961T MMP,
Received Time Feb.13. 2017 3:18PM No.0217
ATrOMUr OIRMn OF WASHINGTON. civii Rig6a Elik. SOU' Fift Awnur, Stdtr. 2000 Swftic*A HIM, . (20,6) /42-4492
I
RM 49.60, the 'Washington Law Against, UseriminatioA, pres&ding#he case in support of the
2 , Complaint filed by Jimelle Harrison; and 3
Respondent -Spike's Food-mart Inc.. ('Spikq',9 Food-Mart" or '.Respondent"),
2.2
4. haVing. been served with the Ndfice of Hearing and Amended Complaint; and the Commission, 5 -appearing by, and through Its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney, General; and Chalia
6 7
Stallings-Alh'ilimaAssWant Money Q.,,-nual; and Respondent, appeating Pro 9e; and. 23
The Conu -nission and Respondent having agreed an 4;.basis fi6r the settlement -of
•8
the matters 4fleged ift the Amended Complaint and to the entry of "this Consent Decree against
9
Resp6ndent Without thd. b&O for hearhig or 4,udi'cation Of -any issue ofkw. or fact,;'-and
fo II
21.4,
Ile Commission and Respondent agree this. Consent Decree. does not constitute
pOddrice or an iidmis6on regarding the existence or •h6ri-existenee of any, Is.sue,. fact, or
12 violatio of any Jaw alleged by 6e- tommissioa with the, excepifion that kespotident. admits -to j 3 -the jurisdiction of this -Court;, and 14
2.5
'Respondent redo,gni2es, and, states that
15
voluntarily
1.6
General's ©I
and
this Consent Decree,ls
entered into
thAt no promises., represeatations, or threats: have been made by The. Attorney-
ce
or any member, officer, ages ox representative- tbereofto irzdueo it to enter-
17 into this Consent Decree, ek6tpt foe the promises and representations provided herein; .and 18 19 20 21
2.6
Respondent Waives any right it may have to appeal from this Consent Decree or
to otherwise contest the validity of this Consent Decree;, and 2.7,
Respondefit agkees, that it
will
not oppose the entry, of this Consent Decree on
the, ground it -fails to comply with CiVil Rule 65(d), and' hereby. waives, any objections based
22 ' thereon; and 23 24
2.8
Respondent further agrees its payments made• or due pursuant to this Consent
Decree are n6t am. enabk to discharge 'in bankruptcy,. and it. shall, not seek or -support th6ir
25 discharge in banlaWWy not oppose their being detennined not amenable to discharge, in 26 'barAmTtey., and 2
C014SENT DECM
Rece ved' Time Feb. 13,
2017
3:18PM No,0217
AT109MY OOMAL oF, wAsHmm ,w dy;I Kightr, [ink - 800`FiftA*=Oc. 5td"200 SaWde Wk 99104 (296)-40M.92
2.5
1
Respondent'.firther agrees its payments made or due pursuant 'to this Cohsent
2
Decree -are not pftferential transfers .of assets, :end it.alf A not make or supp6rt.-argunients to the
3
contrary ifi, bankruptcy court. or elsewhere.
4
The Couz% finding no j.pst'reason for delay;.
5
NOW,. MMFORt, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as.
6
follows: 21.0 This Court has jurisdiction of the -subject- matter of this action and of the pArties.
7
9 .Ihe Commission's Amended Complaint in this- matter. states -claims upon which. relief may be, 9
granted tw&r the WastAngton Law A*st))iscrimfnatioti,.P-CW49.60.
10'
'2.11 This Consent Decree finally resolves a
