Cape Fear Basin Systems Data Summary Steven Nebiker, P.E. Brian McCrodden, P.E. July 23, 2012
Reidsville Demand Pattern
2
Reidsville Discharge Pattern
3
Reidsville Reservoir SAE Curve
4
Burlington Ed Thomas Demand Pattern
5
Burlington Ed Thomas Discharge Pattern
6
Burlington Stoney Ck SAE Curve
7
Burlington Mackintosh Demand Pattern
8
Burlington Mackintosh Discharge Pattern
9
Burlington Mackintosh SAE Curve
10
Graham-Mebane Demand Pattern
11
Graham-Mebane Discharge Pattern
12
Graham-Mebane SAE Curve
13
Greensboro Brandt Demand Pattern
14
Greensboro N. Buff Ck Discharge Pattern
15
Greensboro Brandt SAE Curve
16
Greensboro Townsend Demand Pattern
17
Greensboro TZ Osborne Discharge Pattern
18
Greensboro Townsend SAE Curve
19
OWASA Demand Pattern
20
OWASA Discharge Pattern
21
OWASA Updated Operations • If one reservoir is full and the other is drawn down,
withdraw from the full reservoir • Split withdrawal when both reservoirs are full, and also split the first 100 MG withdrawn • After the reservoirs are drawn down 50 MG each, withdraw the majority from Cane Creek, less 1 MGD from University Lake • Only withdraw from quarry when supplemental flow is needed to meet demands –
22
Refill quarry once Cane Creek is full
Cane Ck Res SAE Curve
23
University Lake SAE Curve
24
Stone Quarry SAE Curve
25
Pittsboro Demand Pattern
26
Pittsboro Discharge Pattern
27
Cary Demand Pattern
28
Cary NWRF Discharge Pattern
29
Cary SWRF Discharge Pattern
30
Jordan SAE Curve
31
RTP Demand Pattern
32
Morrisville Demand Pattern
33
Siler City Demand Pattern
34
Siler City Discharge Pattern
35
Siler City Upper Res SAE Curve
36
Siler City Lower Res SAE Curve
37
Siler City Operations • Draw down the lower reservoir 1 ft • Then draw down the upper reservoir to the lower
rule to meet demand and keep the lower reservoir 1 ft below full • Draw remaining from lower reservoir if needed
38
High Point Demand Pattern
39
High Point Discharge Pattern
40
High Point SAE Curve
41
Randleman Demand Pattern
42
Randleman Discharge Pattern
43
Randleman SAE Curve
44
Randleman Lake Other Demand Patterns
45
Ramseur Demand Pattern
46
Ramseur Discharge Pattern
47
Ramseur SAE Curve
48
Progress CF Demand Pattern
49
Progress CF Discharge Pattern
50
Sanford Demand Pattern
51
Sanford Discharge Pattern
52
Hartnett Co. Demand Pattern
53
Hartnett Co. Discharge Pattern
54
Holly Springs Demand Pattern
55
Holly Springs Discharge Pattern
56
Dunn Demand Pattern
57
Dunn Discharge Pattern
58
Fayetteville Demand Pattern
59
Fayetteville Cross Ck Discharge Pattern
60
Fayetteville Rockfish Ck Discharge Pattern
61
Fayetteville Operations • Withdraw an average of 4.5 MGD from Glenville;
drawing Glenville down to 112.2 ft –
4 cfs min release from Glenville
• Withdraw the rest of demand from the Cape Fear
62
Glenville Res SAE Curve
63
Lower CF WASA Demand Pattern
64
Wilmington Demand Pattern
65
Cape Fear Reservoirs
66
Cape Fear Reservoir Rules
67
Drought Plans • Included drought plans when the triggers allowed
them to be modeled Triggers such as stage/storage or flow can be modeled – Demand based triggers such as peak day demand compared to plant capacity cannot be modeled –
68
Cape Fear Drought Plans Stage 1 Trigger Response Burlington