Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks (CAFIB)

Report 9 Downloads 80 Views
Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks 27 May 2015 | Nurhayati Mohd Khalid & Mohammad Hafiz Norazmar | Islamic Banking and Takaful Department

1

Outline • Background  Development of Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks (CAFIB) • CAFIB requirements  RWA calculation  Capital component • Investment Account as risk absorbent

2

Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks (CAFIB)  Implemented since 2008  Objectives: – to cater for specific structures of Islamic financial transactions; and – to standardise the approach in identifying and measuring risks for the computation of capital adequacy requirement  Islamic banking institutions subject to the capital adequacy framework based on IFSB Capital Adequacy Standard (CAS) – Complement Pillar I of Basel II – Risk profiles & exposures determined based on underlying Shariah contracts (asset-based, lease-based & equity based): – Adopt risk measurements, covering credit risk, market risk & operational risk  Minimum capital adequacy requirements of 8%, consistent with Basel requirement

Risk profile Shariah contracts contracts Shariah Trading book book instruments, instruments, Trading Forex, Commodities Commodities && Forex, Physical assets Physical assets

Risk exposures exposures & & Risk measurement measurement Credit risk; Market risk; and

Operational risk

Capital requirement Minimum of 8%

3

CAFIB: Further enhancements made in 2013 to cater for Basel III capital reform  Revision made effective 1 Jan 2013  Objectives: – to raise the quality & consistency of the total capital – to cater for specific structures of Islamic capital instruments  Enhancements – Capital base to be predominantly common equity Tier 1 (CET1 i.e. ordinary shares, retained earnings and reserves) – Other non-common equity capital instruments to be of higher quality – Deductions and prudential filters made via CET1  More granular minimum capital adequacy requirements

Capital Risk profile ratios 4.5% CET1 Shariah contracts 8% TC Trading book instruments, Forex, 10.5% TC&+Physical CCB In Commodities assets 2018 13% TC + CCyB

Risk exposures & Capital instruments measurement CET1 Additional Tier 1 Tier 2

Enhancing Risk Coverage (for Counterparty Credit Risk) - Stressed input - Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) - Central Counterparties (CCP)

Yet to be implemented

4

Basel III implementation timeframe for Malaysia

5

Key features addressing Islamic financial transactions

• Scope

• Investment account (IA) holders absorb credit & market risks arising from assets funded by IA

Investment Account as Risk Absorbent

Application for Islamic financial transactions

• Look-through approach from IA holder’s perspective Capital Instruments

• Types of Shariah contracts • Clarity on loss absorption mechanism

Separate compliance for Islamic banking windows

RWA Calculations

• Risk exposures of Islamic financial transactions are determined based on underlying Shariah contracts

Risk Management

Scope: Islamic banking institutions & Islamic banking windows are subject to CAFIB Holding Company

Holding Company

Parent Bank (Conventional)

Islamic Bank (Domestic)

Islamic Bank (Foreign)

Islamic Banking Subsidiary

Conventional Bank

Islamic window

“Bank within a bank”

Subject to CAFIB





Separate minimum capital adequacy ratios at Islamic window level, in addition to compliance on consolidated basis at conventional bank level - i.e. Islamic window’s total capital (Islamic banking fund) must be at minimum 8 % of its total RWA Islamic window may raise its own capital e.g. via issuance of common equities or sukuk that qualify as CET1, AT1 or T2 - Conversion or write off of AT1 or T2 must be allocated to the Islamic banking fund

Key features addressing Islamic financial transactions

• Scope

• Investment account (IA) holders absorb credit & market risks arising from assets funded by IA

Investment Account as Risk Absorbent

Application for Islamic financial transactions

• Look-through approach from IA holder’s perspective Capital Instruments

• Types of Shariah contracts • Clarity on loss absorption mechanism

Separate compliance for Islamic banking windows

RWA calculations

• Risk exposures of Islamic financial transactions are determined based on underlying Shariah contracts

Various Shariah contracts to support Islamic financial transactions Shariah Contracts

Fee Based

Equity Based

Sale Based • Murabahah (cost plus mark up) • Salam (forward sale) • Istisna` (construction/ manufacturing) • Ijarah (lease)

• Mudarabah (profit sharing & loss bearing) • Musharakah (profit & loss sharing)

• • • •

Wakalah (agency) Wadiah (safe keeping) Kafalah (guarantee) Rahnu (collateral)

Supporting Arrangements • Urbun (earnest money) • Hamish Jiddiyyah (security deposit) • Wa`d (undertaking) • Hibah (gift)

The Shariah contracts are applied to structure various Islamic banking products

Asset

Liability

Asset-based financing • Murabahah • Ijarah • Istisna

Investment Account • Mudarabah • Musharakah • Wakalah

Profit Sharing financing • Mudarabah • Musharakah • Wakalah

Islamic deposit • Wadiah • Qard • Tawarruq

The unique features of each Shariah contract entail different risk profile / exposure to Islamic banks… 9

Risk exposures are determined based on stages of Shariah contract Market Risk – based on type of risk eg. inventory risk, fx risk 1

Asset-based Sale and purchase contracts • Murabahah

Stages of contract Purchase of assets for sale or leasing

(mark-up sale)

• Salam (forward purchase)

• Istisna’ (Purchase of asset under construction)

Sell to customer on deferred payment terms

Leasing contracts

Or

• Ijarah • Ijarah Muntahia Bitamleek

Lease to customer

Risk exposure/ profile Market risk • Price risk arising from holding of assets Transform Credit risk • Sales or rental receivables due from counterparty

Credit Risk - Based on asset class eg. Sovereigns & Central Banks, Banking Institutions, Corporates, Regulatory Retail*, Residential Real Estate* * Applicable to Murabahah or Ijarah contracts. For recognition of other contracts, only allowed if credit risk profile is similar to Murabahah or Ijarah

Risk exposures are determined based on stages of Shariah contract Treated as equity exposure: ▪ 100% (publicly traded) ▪ 150% (non-publicly traded) Supervisory Slotting Criteria** ▪ RW ranging 70% to 400%

2

Profit sharing Joint venture/ partnership contract • Mudharabah (Profit sharing)

• Musharakah (Profit and loss sharing)

Stages of contract • Capital investment in commercial entities • Profits are shared based on agreed ratio • Losses are shared or borne by capital providers

Risk exposure/ profile Equity risk • Equity position in banking book - Capital impairment

Market risk • Equity position trading book - underlying assets

Treated as equity exposure: Specific & general risk charge depending on type of equity.

Murabahah

1 Asset held for sale

Stages of contract

Purchase Asset

2 Asset sold & payment due from obligor Sell Asset

Capital Treatment

Murabahah & Non-binding MPO1

Binding MPO

Credit Risk: None Market risk: 15% capital charge (x) exposure amount Credit Risk2: RW based on obligor’s ratings (x) exposure amount net MV of asset Market risk: None

1Murabahah 2 Assuming

Credit risk: RW based on obligor’s ratings (x) exposure amount Market risk: None Credit risk: RW based on obligor’s ratings (x) exposure amount

Market risk: None

for Purchase Orderer with non-binding Agreement to Purchase (AP) islamic bank has legal recourse to obligor for any shortfall after asset disposal

12

Operating Ijarah

Stages of contract

1 Purchase Asset

2

Asset held for lease

Lease Asset

3

Asset leased & rental due from lessee

End of lease period

Residual life of asset

Capital Treatment

NonBinding Agreement to Lease (AL)

Binding AL

Credit Risk: None Market risk: 15% capital charge (x) exposure amount

Credit Risk1: RW based on lessee’s ratings (x) exposure amount net MV of asset

Credit risk: RW based on lessee’s ratings (x) exposure amount net asset recovery value

Credit risk: None Market risk: 15% capital charge (x) exposure amount

Market risk: 8% capital charge on asset residual value

Similar as above

Market risk: None

1 Assuming

islamic bank has legal recourse to lessee for any shortfall after asset disposal

13

Ijarah Muntahia Bitamleek (IMB)

Stages of contract

1 Purchase Asset

2

Asset held for lease

Lease Asset

Asset leased & rental due from lessee

End of lease period & transfer of asset to lessee

Capital Treatment

NonBinding Agreement to Lease (AL)

Binding AL

Credit Risk: None Market risk: 15% capital charge (x) exposure amount

Credit Risk1: RW based on obligor’s ratings (x) exposure amount net MV of asset

Credit risk: RW based on obligor’s ratings (x) exposure amount net asset recovery value Market risk: None

Similar as above

Market risk: None

1 Assuming islamic bank

has legal recourse to lessee for any shortfall after asset disposal

14

Approach for market & operational risk Market Risk

Operational Risk

• Definition: - Market risk is defined as risk of losses in onand off-balance sheet positions arising from movements in market prices

• Definition: - Risk of losses resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events - excludes strategic & reputational risks - includes Shariah compliance risk

• Types of market risk: – Benchmarking rate risk and equity risk : Capital charges are calculated based on Specific risk and General risk – Foreign exchange risk: Capital charge is calculated based on exposure to single currency and Portfolio mix – Commodity risk: 15% capital charge is applied based on either maturity ladder or simplified approach – Inventory risk: 15% capital charge is applied to assets held as inventory with a view to resale or lease More prevalent in Islamic financial transactions e.g. murabahah to purchase orderer or operating ijarah

More prevalent in Islamic financial transactions.

• Approaches: Basic Indicator Approach

Standardised/ Alternative Standardised Approach

Increased sophistication

Advanced Measurement

Key features addressing Islamic financial transaction requirements

• Scope

• Investment account (IA) holders absorb credit & market risks arising from assets funded by IA

Investment Account as Risk Absorbent

Application for Islamic financial transactions

Separate compliance for Islamic banking windows

RWA calculations

• Look-through approach from IA holder’s perspective Capital Instruments

• Types of Shariah contracts • Clarity on loss absorption mechanism

Risk exposures of Islamic financial transactions are determined based on underlying Shariah contracts

Main changes for capital instruments

Basel I/II • Common Equity • Hybrid Tier 1 (Non-Inno Tier 1 & Inno Tier 1) • Tier 2 Subordinated instruments

Basel III • CET1 • Additional Tier 1 • Tier 2 Subordinated instruments

• Loss absorption limited to repayments terms & level of subordination • Step-ups allowed

• Principal loss absorption • Non-Viability Loss absorption • Step-ups not allowed

No specific treatment for Shariah compliant instruments

Treatment for Shariah compliant instruments clarified

Specific requirements on Shariah-compliant capital instruments

Shariah contracts

• Additional Tier 1 use only non-exchange based contracts (ie. Musyarakah & Mudarabah) • Due to perpetuality of instruments • No restrictions on type of Shariah contract for Tier 2 instruments

Loss absorption mechanism

• Conversion or write-off mechanism are allowed for exchange-based contracts (eg. conversion of sub-debt into ordinary shares) • Conversion mechanism for non-exchange-based contracts (eg. conversion of Additional Tier 1 into ordinary shares)

Use of SPV

• Use of an independent SPV is allowed in structures that require the use of such SPVs (e.g. Murabahah or Ijarah) • The multiple contracts used in SPV structures must in combination meet the criteria for inclusion in capital. Eg. purchase undertaking must not legally or economically enhance the seniority of capital issued

Transparency & Clarity

Submission of: • Explanation of the salient features of the Shariah contract and Shariahcompliant mechanisms used in structuring the capital instrument • Confirmation that the write-off mechanism is Shariah-compliant, if the mechanisms other than those specified by SAC is used

Key features addressing Islamic financial transaction requirements

• Scope

• Investment account (IA) holders absorb credit & market risks arising from assets funded by IA

Investment Account as Risk Absorbent

Application for Islamic financial transactions

Separate compliance for Islamic banking windows

RWA calculations

• Look-through approach from IA holder’s perspective Capital Instruments

• Types of Shariah contracts • Clarity on loss absorption mechanism

Risk exposures of Islamic financial transactions are determined based on underlying Shariah contracts

Investment Account as Risk Absorbent CAR for Islamic banks

Capital Base

=

Total RWA Less Credit and Market RWA funded by IA

Islamic Banking Act (IBA) Deposit include funds received under any contract Guidelines on Recognition & Measurement of PSIA as Risk Absorbent •



Risk absorbent only allowed for Restricted Investment Account (RIA) – loss fully transferred to PSIA holders No risk absorbent for Unrestricted Investment Account (URIA) because tools to manage Displaced Commercial Risks (DCR) is allowed eg. Profit Equalisation Reserves

Islamic Financial Services Act (IFSA) Funds with non-principal guarantee feature are defined as investment eg. Mudarabah, Musyarakah, Wakalah Investment Account Framework • •

Both RIA & URIA effectively & fully transfer loss to IA holders Full risk absorbent allowed as tools to manage Displaced Commercial Risks (DCR) is no longer allowed.

Only products structured as per IA Framework are eligible as risk absorbent 1 Product Structuring 6 • Product Disclosure Sheet • Terms & Conditions • Financial information disclosure

• Suitability & Fair dealing practices

2 • Separate management of IA

Transparency & Disclosure

5 Business & Market Conduct

• Shariah compliant • Redemption of investment account investment • Investment • Profit distribution objectives • Valuation

Manageme nt of IA

IA Framework

3 Oversight Arrangement

4 Risk Management & Internal Control

• Robust governance process to ensure effective oversight of investment mandate & strategies - Board - Shariah Committee - Senior Management

• Tagging capability facilitates measurement of risks & return • Appropriate identification & measurement of losses ensure effective risk transfer to IAH 21

PSIA as Risk Absorbent Look through approach IA Holder (Rabbul Mal) (e.g. parent bank)

No capital requirement for Mudarib as risks of underlying assets are transferred to Rabbul Mal

Fund placement

IA Manager (Mudarib) (e.g. Islamic subsidiary)

Capital requirement for Rabbul Mal is based on the underlying asset

Financing (i.e. underlying asset)

Credit Risk •

Under the standardised approach (SA), the Rabbul Mal shall calculate the capital requirement based on the risk weight applicable to the obligor of the underlying asset. Under the IRB approach, the Rabbul Mal shall calculate the capital requirements of the underlying asset.

Market Risk •



The Rabbul Mal shall classify the underlying asset as a trading book position based on its own trading book policy statement. Under the standardised approach, the Rabbul Mal shall use the appropriate capital charge of the underlying asset. Under the IMA, the Rabbul Mal shall calculate the capital requirements of the underlying asset.

22

The End

23