Certain Access: How to Create a Multitiered System of Supports

Report 5 Downloads 33 Views
Mike Mattos

Day 2—Afternoon Keynote

Certain Access: How to Create a Multitiered System of Supports

Mike Mattos

121

The Four Cs of RTI 1. Collective responsibility 2. Concentrated instruction 3. Convergent assessment

Certain Access

4. Certain access

How to Create a Multitiered  System of Supports Mike Mattos 

PLC at Work™ and RTI at Work™ Architect

#rtiaw

Certain Access “A systematic process that guarantees  every student will receive the time and  support needed to learn at high levels.  “Thinking is guided by the question,  How do we get every child there?” —Buffum, Mattos, & Weber, Simplifying Response to Intervention: Four Essential Guiding Principles (2012), p. 10

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

123

124

RTI at Work Workshop RTITree at Work © Solution 2016 •Workshop SolutionTree.com © Solution Tree 2015. solution-tree.com. Reproducible. Reproducible. Certain Access: Tier 2 to Tier 3

Certain Access: Tier 1 to Tier 2

Universal Screening

Schoolwide Teams Take Lead Responsibility

Behavior

Attendance

English language

Number sense

Writing

Reading

Tier 3: Intensive Remediation in Universal Skills

Tier 3: Certain Access

Leadership Team

Teacher Teams

Intervention Team

Immediate Action Steps

Our Mission

To ensure that all students learn at grade level or higher!

Teacher Teams Take Lead Responsibility

Tier 2: Additional Time and Support to Meet Grade-Level Essentials

Tier 2: Certain Access

Tier 1: Access to Grade-Level Essentials for All Students

Universal Screening and Diagnostic Assessments

The RTI at Work Pyramid

REPRODUCIBLE

Tier 1 = what all kids get Green box = teacher team responsibility

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

Essential Tier 1 Teacher Team Outcomes  Identify essential standards for every grade and course.  Share essential learning targets with students.  Give common assessments for every essential standard.  Identify students for Tier 2 by student, by standard, by learning target.

#rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

125

Essential Tier 1 Schoolwide Outcomes

Essential Tier 1 Schoolwide Outcomes  Schedule weekly collaboration time.

Tier 1 = what all kids get Red box = leadership team responsibility

 Provide all students access to grade‐level essential standards.  Identify and teach essential schoolwide academic and social behaviors.

#rtiaw

Academic Behaviors

Social Behaviors  Responsible verbal and physical interactions with peers and adults  Appropriate language  Respect for property and materials  Regular attendance  Self‐monitoring

126

page 5

 Metacognition: knowledge and beliefs about thinking  Self‐concept: a student’s belief in his or her abilities  Self‐monitoring: the ability to plan and prepare for learning  Motivation: the ability to initiate and maintain interest in tasks  Strategy: techniques for organization and memorization of knowledge  Volition: the efforts and techniques needed to stay motivated and engaged in learning

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

page 5

Fundamental Assumptions  Not all students learn the same way.  Not all students learn at the same speed.

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

Tier 2 Tier 2 = extra help in meeting grade‐level  essential standards

Will

Skill

Green box = teacher team responsibility

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

127

Skill

Will

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

Teacher Team Responsibilities  Clearly define essential student learning outcomes.  Provide effective Tier 1 core instruction.  Assess student learning and the effectiveness of instruction.  Identify students in need of additional time and support (every three weeks).  Take primary responsibility for Tier 2 supplemental interventions for students who have failed to master the team’s identified essential standards.

Certain Access “A systematic process that guarantees  every student will receive the time and  support needed to learn at high levels.  “Thinking is guided by the question,  How do we get every child there?” —Buffum, Mattos, & Weber, Simplifying Response to Intervention: Four Essential Guiding Principles (2012), p. 10

#rtiaw

128

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

A Systematic Response Must …

Certain Access: Student Information  Tier 2 skill: common assessment data

 Identify  Determine  Monitor  Revise  Extend … regardless of the teachers. #rtiaw

Tier 2 Help

#rtiaw

Select and unwrap essential  student learning outcomes  and develop a unit  assessment plan.

Analyze summative  assessment results;  identify students in  need of supplemental  interventions.

Introduce learning  targets to students.   Begin core instruction.

Analyze formative assessment  results, provide mid‐unit  interventions, and continue  and/or complete core  instruction.

Tier 1 Prevention

#rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

129

Tier 2 = extra support in meeting grade‐level  essential standards Red box = leadership team responsibility

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

How Much Time and How Often? There must be flexible time embedded into the  master schedule for teacher teams to lead  supplemental interventions.

 Frequently (weekly)  About 30 minutes per session  Available to all students Students cannot miss new essential standards.

#rtiaw

130

#rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

Tier 2

Will

Will

Skill

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

Ensure that sufficient, effective resources are  available to provide Tier 2 interventions for  students in need of supplemental support in:  Motivation  Attendance  Behavior #rtiaw

Coordinate schoolwide human resources to best  support core instruction and interventions,  including:  Administration  Site counselors  Psychologists  Instructional aides  Other classified staff #rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

131

Fundamental Assumptions  Some students will lack the essential skills from previous years.

#rtiaw

#rtiaw

Universal Skills of Learning Tier 3 = intensive remediation in universal skills

 Reading  Writing

Red box = leadership team responsibility

 Number sense  English language  Attendance  Behavior

#rtiaw

132

#rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

Three Critical Teams

School Intervention Team

#rtiaw

          

Principal Counselor Psychologist Speech and language pathologist English language development specialist Reading specialist Math specialist Special education teacher Nurse Librarian Community resource officer #rtiaw

The school intervention team’s primary  responsibility is to coordinate the school’s  efforts to meet the needs of individual students  requiring intensive support.

#rtiaw

What if Tiers 1, 2, and 3 don’t work for a specific student?

#rtiaw

© Mattos 2017. SolutionTree.com. Do not duplicate.

133

REPRODUCIBLE

Building a Site Intervention Team Team Members:

Essential Role

Recommended

Administration

Principal

Reading

Reading specialist

Writing

ELA specialist

Math

Math specialist

English language

EL specialist

Teaching differentiation

Speech and language pathologist Special education teacher

Behavior

Psychologist

Social–family

Counselor

Instructional resources

Librarian

Community resources

Community resource officer Social worker Counselor

Language

Staff Members Best Trained to Meet This Need

When will this team meet? Determine a weekly meeting time and location. Time: Location: Team norms:

134

RTI at Work Workshop © Solution Tree 2016 • SolutionTree.com Reproducible.

REPRODUCIBLE

Essential Questions for Special Education Identification These questions are designed to help a site intervention team consider if special education identification is appropriate, justified, and defendable for a student. Unless the intervention team can answer each question affirmatively, then the decision to recommend special education is not appropriate or defendable. Tier 1: y

Did the student have access to rigorous, grade-level curriculum?

y

What evidence do we have that our school’s initial instruction (Tier I) was effective for similar students?

y

Was the student given additional time and differentiated instruction during Tier I instruction?

Tier 2: y

Did we identify the student for supplemental time and support in a timely manner?

y

What were the child’s specific learning needs?

y

What was the cause of the student’s struggles?

y

What research-based interventions were used to address the student’s specific learning needs?

y

What evidence do we have that these interventions were effective for similar students?

Tier 3: y

When was the child referred for intensive support?

y

What quality problem-solving process was used to better identify the child’s specific learning needs and the cause(s) of the student’s struggles?

y

What research-based interventions were used to address the student’s specific learning needs?

y

What evidence do we have that these interventions were effective for students with similar needs?

y

Are there any other intervention or supports that can or should be tried before considering special education placement?

y

Do we have agreement among the intervention team that special education is necessary and appropriate to meet the needs of this child? Is this decision defensible?

Simplifying Response to Intervention © Solution Tree Press 2012 • SolutionTree.com Visit go.SolutionTree.com/rti to download this page.

135