Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-â17
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Summary of Ratings by Program
Fine Arts Wellness and Physical Education Community and Parental Involvement 21st Century Workforce Development Second Language Acquisition Digital Learning Environment Dropout Prevention Strategies Gifted and Talented
2016-‐17 Score
2016-‐17 Rating
Letter Grade that WOULD BE ASSIGNED IF this were 2017-‐18
4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.0 2.7
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Recognized
B
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Fine Arts Indicators 1
2
3
4
Did the campus provide regular opportunities for students to participate in fine arts curriculum? Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
0
1
2
No opportunities 1 opportunity for for students students
Did the campus offer and encourage student involvement in co-‐curricular fine arts 1 to 2 No opportunities activities? opportunities for Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
What percentage of students participating in fine arts curriculum were involved in fine arts competitions? Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
Did the campus host Fine Arts events to which the community or parents were invited to attend? Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
for students
students
3
4
2 opportunities 4 opportunities offered for offered for students students
5 or more opportunities offered for students
3 opportunities 4 opportunities offered for offered for students students
5 or more opportunities offered for students
1% to 5% of 6% to 9% of 10% to 15% of More than 15% No participating participating FA participating FA participating FA participating FA FA students students students students students involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA competitions competitions competitions competitions competitions
No FA events
1 or 2 FA events
3 FA events
4 FA events
5 or more FA events
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Wellness and Physical Education Indicators 1
2
Did the campus participate in the Coordinated Approach to School Health program through PE, cafeteria, classroom and building wide efforts? Examples: Morning announcments, featuring "slow", "go" and "whoa" foods, members of SHAC Committee & Physical Activity and Fitness Sub-‐committee, SPARK curriculum in PE, participating in daily recess, Mustangs on the Move Fitness Challenge; President's Physical Fitness Test
Did the campus provide opportunities for students and parents to attend events that focused on wellness, emotional health, or overall wellbeing for students? Examples: Coffee Talk w/ Mrs. Clardy, NSCISD Adventure Race in spring, Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate Club,
Did the campus provide opportunities for active employee wellness? 3
Examples: Mustangs on the Move Fitness challenge, monthy wellness updates from campus nurse, notification of Health & Wellness Challenge sponsored by district health insurance company; access to track
0
1
2
3
No building wide 1 building wide 2 building wide 3 building wide efforts effort efforts efforts
4 4 or more building wide efforts
4 or more No opportunities 1 opportunity for 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for for students students for students for students students
4 or more No opportunities 1 opportunity for 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for for employees employees for employees for employees employees
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Community and Parental Involvement Indicators
0
Did the campus offer opportunities for parents and community volunteers to work in the school in roles or activities that support the needs of the district? No opportunities 1 Examples: Drug & Alcohol Awareness, Local historian shares town history, classroom volunteer, Wildlife Awareness Presentation, Sexting & Cyberbulling Presentation
Were community or parent representatives encouraged to serve as active participants in campus-‐level planning such as involvement on the Parent Advisory 2 Committee?
No opportunities
1
2
3
4
1 to 2 opportunities
3 opportunities
4 opportunities
5 or more opportunities
1 to 2 opportunities
3 opportunities
4 opportunities
5 or more opportunities
Examples: Campus Improvement Plan Committee, LPAC Meetings, Title One Parent Involvement Meetings
3
4
Did the campus use a variety of communication tools to inform parents of school news and information? Examples: Shared information for District Facebook, District Website, email, teacher communication, flyers/letters home, District marquee, Remind101
Did the campus provide parents and community members with opportunities to be involved in classrooms or school events? Examples: Meet the Teacher night, parent meetings, Family Reading Night, Adventure Race, pep rallies, Award Ceremonies
No 1 2 3 4 or more communication communication communication communication communication tools tool tools tools tools
No opportunities
1 to 2 opportunities
3 opportunities
4 opportunities
5 or more opportunities
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
21st Century Workforce Development Indicators 1
Did the campus host or participate in college/career activities or opportunities during the current academic year? Examples: College shirt day -‐ every Wednesday, College Tree, guidance lessons, College and Career Day, College & Career Research Project
0
1
2
3
4
No activities or opportunities
1 activity or opportunity
2 activities or opportunities
3 activities or opportunities
4 activities or opportunities
Up to 25% of 26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of > 75% of No teachers teachers were teachers were teachers were teachers were were observed observed using observed using observed using observed using Examples: iPads, laptops, Chromebooks, SMART boards, Apple TV, Flat screen TVs, Elmos, Google using technology technology technology technology technology Classroom, Google Apps, Online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL -‐ math, language arts, science, ST Math, applications applications applications applications applications Study Island > 75% of Did the campus give students the opportunity to participate/have access to 21st Students do not Up to 25% of 26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of students have students have students have students have have access to century learning tools to enhance student engagement/learning? access to access to access to access to technology for Examples: iPads, Chrome Books, Laptops, Computer Lab, online programs, Google Apps, Google technology for technology for technology for technology for learning Classroom learning learning learning learning
Were technology applications integrated and blended into teacher instruction? 2
3
Were students offered the opportunities to participate in Career and Technology Education courses, project-‐based learning opportunities, or other instructional 4 activities reflecting the needs of 21st century learners? Examples: Principles of Agriculture, Principles of Technology, Principles of Business, Project-‐based learning, labs, Online learning -‐ Google Classroom & Google Apps
Students were not offered opportunities
Up to 25% of students participated in opportunities
26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of students studentsparticip participated in ated in opportunities opportunities
> 75% of students participated in opportunities
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Second Language Acquisition Indicators Did English Language Learners (ELLs) on campus meet or exceed progress on 1 STAAR? Data from 2016 STAAR for math & reading = 49%
2
Did campus staff participate in yearly ELPS Instruction training and LPAC training as applicable? Examples: LPAC training as required, ELPS Instruction training for all
3
Did ELL students on campus demonstrate development in progress as it relates to TELPAS? Met is maintaining composit TELPAS rating and exceed is increasing one or more rating level.
0
1
0% met or exceeded progress
0% trained in ELPS Instruction
Below state standard
2
3
1% to 20% met 21% to 40% met 41% to 60% met or exceeded or exceeded or exceeded progress progress progress
1% to 20% trained in ELPS Instruction
21% to 40% trained in ELPS Instruction
4 > 60% met or exceeded progress
41% to 60% > 60% trained in trained in ELPS ELPS Instruction Instruction
1% to 20% met 21% to 40% met 41% to 60% met or exceeded or exceeded or exceeded progress progress progress
> 60% met or exceeded progress
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Digital Learning Environment Indicators
1
Did the campus provide digital learning professional development opportunities for teachers? Examples: Read,Write, Gold, QuickTime, DMAC, Achieve 3000, ST Math
2
Do parents have access to online resources to monitor student learning and progress? Examples: Gradebook Parent Portal, Achieve 3000 Parent Log In, Remind101
3
Do teachers regularly integrate use of technology and digital learning resources during classroom instruction? Examples: teacher webpage, online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL Math, Language Arts & Science, ST Math, Study Island, Edusmart Science
4
Do all students have access to technology for learning in the classroom? Examples: iPads, Chrombooks, Laptops
0
1
2
3
4
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No teachers teachers teachers teachers teachers participated in at participated in at participated in at participated in at participated in at least 3 hours of least 3 hours of least 3 hours of least 3 hours of least 3 hours of instructional instructional instructional instructional instructional technology PD technology PD technology PD technology PD technology PD 0% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of parents No parents have parents have parents have parents have have access to access to online access to online access to online access to online online resources resources to resources to resources to resources to to monitor monitor learning monitor learning monitor learning monitor learning learning 1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No teachers teachers were teachers were teachers were teachers were were observed observed observed observed observed integrating integrating integrating integrating integrating technology and technology and technology and technology and technology and digital learning digital learning digital learning digital learning digital learning resources resources resources resources resources 1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No students students have students have students have students have have access to access to access to access to access to technology for technology for technology for technology for technology for learning in the learning in the learning in the learning in the learning in the classroom classroom classroom classroom classroom
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Dropout Prevention Strategies Indicators Does the campus offer clubs/organizations for students? 1
2
Examples: Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate, Kung Foo Club, Newsletter Club, Student Council, National Junior Honor Society, Mustangs on the Move
Does the campus offer multiple opportunities for students to participate in college/career readiness activities? Example: career day, career explorations, college days, monthly guidance lessons, Advisory period
Does the campus actively review campus attendance data? 3
4
Data Sources: TxEIS, eSPED, individual student documentation with pattern of absences, daily review of absences and parent communication, teacher review every three week grading period, PBIS
Does the campus attempt to schedule conferences with parents/students who are having attendance issues?
0
1
No clubs/organ-‐ izations offered
2
3
1 to 2 3 to 4 5 to 6 clubs/organ-‐ clubs/organ-‐ clubs/organ-‐ izations offered izations offered izations offered
4 7 or more clubs/organ-‐ izations offered
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No students students students students students participated in a participated in at participated in at participated in at participated in at CCR activity least 1 CCR least 1 CCR least 1 CCR least 1 CCR activity activity activity activity No regular reviews
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
No regular attempts
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Gifted and Talented Indicators Do teachers on campus meet minumum state GT training requirements? 1
Do parents of GT students have opportunities to learn about the GT program 2 during the school year? Examples: Letter home, GT Showcase Event(s)
0
1
2
3
4
100% of GT 100% of GT < 100% GT 100% of GT GT teachers did teachers met teachers met teachers met teachers met not meet state state state state minimum state requirements requirements requirements of requirements of GT training plus 6 or more plus 12 or more 12 hours of 12 hours of requirements additional hours additional hours training training of training of training The campus did 7 or more not provide 1 or 2 identified 3 or 4 identified 5 or 6 identified identified information opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities about the GT were provided to were provided to were provided to were provided to program to parents parents parents parents parents
Is the GT curriculum designed to meet the social, emotional, and learning needs of No identified 1 to 2 identified 3 to 4 identified 5 to 6 identified More than 7 the gifted including opportunities such as project-‐based learning, collaborative types of types of types of types of identified types opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities of opportunities 3 team-‐work, learning perseverance, time management, organization, and goal were provided to were provided to were provided to were provided to were provided to setting? Examples: Mock election, create perfect utopia,"Was Museum" -‐ significance person made in world, work individually, pairs, small groups, class decides topics and how far to delve into topics,
students
students
students
students
students
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
ool
Grade that WOULD BE ASSIGNED IF his were 2017-‐18 A A A A A A A B
ool
Score 4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
2
4
4
3.5 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 3
4
4
3.7 A Exemplary
ool
Score
4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score
3
2
3
2.7 B Recognized
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Summary of Ratings by Program
Fine Arts Wellness and Physical Education Community and Parental Involvement 21st Century Workforce Development Second Language Acquisition Digital Learning Environment Dropout Prevention Strategies Gifted and Talented
2016-‐17 Score
2016-‐17 Rating
Letter Grade that WOULD BE ASSIGNED IF this were 2017-‐18
4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.0 2.7
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Recognized
B
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Fine Arts Indicators 1
2
3
4
Did the campus provide regular opportunities for students to participate in fine arts curriculum? Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
0
1
2
No opportunities 1 opportunity for for students students
Did the campus offer and encourage student involvement in co-‐curricular fine arts 1 to 2 No opportunities activities? opportunities for Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
What percentage of students participating in fine arts curriculum were involved in fine arts competitions? Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
Did the campus host Fine Arts events to which the community or parents were invited to attend? Examples: Band concerts -‐ beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts -‐ Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
for students
students
3
4
2 opportunities 4 opportunities offered for offered for students students
5 or more opportunities offered for students
3 opportunities 4 opportunities offered for offered for students students
5 or more opportunities offered for students
1% to 5% of 6% to 9% of 10% to 15% of More than 15% No participating participating FA participating FA participating FA participating FA FA students students students students students involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA competitions competitions competitions competitions competitions
No FA events
1 or 2 FA events
3 FA events
4 FA events
5 or more FA events
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Wellness and Physical Education Indicators 1
2
Did the campus participate in the Coordinated Approach to School Health program through PE, cafeteria, classroom and building wide efforts? Examples: Morning announcments, featuring "slow", "go" and "whoa" foods, members of SHAC Committee & Physical Activity and Fitness Sub-‐committee, SPARK curriculum in PE, participating in daily recess, Mustangs on the Move Fitness Challenge; President's Physical Fitness Test
Did the campus provide opportunities for students and parents to attend events that focused on wellness, emotional health, or overall wellbeing for students? Examples: Coffee Talk w/ Mrs. Clardy, NSCISD Adventure Race in spring, Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate Club,
Did the campus provide opportunities for active employee wellness? 3
Examples: Mustangs on the Move Fitness challenge, monthy wellness updates from campus nurse, notification of Health & Wellness Challenge sponsored by district health insurance company; access to track
0
1
2
3
No building wide 1 building wide 2 building wide 3 building wide efforts effort efforts efforts
4 4 or more building wide efforts
4 or more No opportunities 1 opportunity for 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for for students students for students for students students
4 or more No opportunities 1 opportunity for 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for for employees employees for employees for employees employees
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Community and Parental Involvement Indicators
0
Did the campus offer opportunities for parents and community volunteers to work in the school in roles or activities that support the needs of the district? No opportunities 1 Examples: Drug & Alcohol Awareness, Local historian shares town history, classroom volunteer, Wildlife Awareness Presentation, Sexting & Cyberbulling Presentation
Were community or parent representatives encouraged to serve as active participants in campus-‐level planning such as involvement on the Parent Advisory 2 Committee?
No opportunities
1
2
3
4
1 to 2 opportunities
3 opportunities
4 opportunities
5 or more opportunities
1 to 2 opportunities
3 opportunities
4 opportunities
5 or more opportunities
Examples: Campus Improvement Plan Committee, LPAC Meetings, Title One Parent Involvement Meetings
3
4
Did the campus use a variety of communication tools to inform parents of school news and information? Examples: Shared information for District Facebook, District Website, email, teacher communication, flyers/letters home, District marquee, Remind101
Did the campus provide parents and community members with opportunities to be involved in classrooms or school events? Examples: Meet the Teacher night, parent meetings, Family Reading Night, Adventure Race, pep rallies, Award Ceremonies
No 1 2 3 4 or more communication communication communication communication communication tools tool tools tools tools
No opportunities
1 to 2 opportunities
3 opportunities
4 opportunities
5 or more opportunities
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
21st Century Workforce Development Indicators 1
Did the campus host or participate in college/career activities or opportunities during the current academic year? Examples: College shirt day -‐ every Wednesday, College Tree, guidance lessons, College and Career Day, College & Career Research Project
0
1
2
3
4
No activities or opportunities
1 activity or opportunity
2 activities or opportunities
3 activities or opportunities
4 activities or opportunities
Up to 25% of 26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of > 75% of No teachers teachers were teachers were teachers were teachers were were observed observed using observed using observed using observed using Examples: iPads, laptops, Chromebooks, SMART boards, Apple TV, Flat screen TVs, Elmos, Google using technology technology technology technology technology Classroom, Google Apps, Online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL -‐ math, language arts, science, ST Math, applications applications applications applications applications Study Island > 75% of Did the campus give students the opportunity to participate/have access to 21st Students do not Up to 25% of 26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of students have students have students have students have have access to century learning tools to enhance student engagement/learning? access to access to access to access to technology for Examples: iPads, Chrome Books, Laptops, Computer Lab, online programs, Google Apps, Google technology for technology for technology for technology for learning Classroom learning learning learning learning
Were technology applications integrated and blended into teacher instruction? 2
3
Were students offered the opportunities to participate in Career and Technology Education courses, project-‐based learning opportunities, or other instructional 4 activities reflecting the needs of 21st century learners? Examples: Principles of Agriculture, Principles of Technology, Principles of Business, Project-‐based learning, labs, Online learning -‐ Google Classroom & Google Apps
Students were not offered opportunities
Up to 25% of students participated in opportunities
26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of students studentsparticip participated in ated in opportunities opportunities
> 75% of students participated in opportunities
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Second Language Acquisition Indicators Did English Language Learners (ELLs) on campus meet or exceed progress on 1 STAAR? Data from 2016 STAAR for math & reading = 49%
2
Did campus staff participate in yearly ELPS Instruction training and LPAC training as applicable? Examples: LPAC training as required, ELPS Instruction training for all
3
Did ELL students on campus demonstrate development in progress as it relates to TELPAS? Met is maintaining composit TELPAS rating and exceed is increasing one or more rating level.
0
1
0% met or exceeded progress
0% trained in ELPS Instruction
Below state standard
2
3
1% to 20% met 21% to 40% met 41% to 60% met or exceeded or exceeded or exceeded progress progress progress
1% to 20% trained in ELPS Instruction
21% to 40% trained in ELPS Instruction
4 > 60% met or exceeded progress
41% to 60% > 60% trained in trained in ELPS ELPS Instruction Instruction
1% to 20% met 21% to 40% met 41% to 60% met or exceeded or exceeded or exceeded progress progress progress
> 60% met or exceeded progress
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Digital Learning Environment Indicators
1
Did the campus provide digital learning professional development opportunities for teachers? Examples: Read,Write, Gold, QuickTime, DMAC, Achieve 3000, ST Math
2
Do parents have access to online resources to monitor student learning and progress? Examples: Gradebook Parent Portal, Achieve 3000 Parent Log In, Remind101
3
Do teachers regularly integrate use of technology and digital learning resources during classroom instruction? Examples: teacher webpage, online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL Math, Language Arts & Science, ST Math, Study Island, Edusmart Science
4
Do all students have access to technology for learning in the classroom? Examples: iPads, Chrombooks, Laptops
0
1
2
3
4
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No teachers teachers teachers teachers teachers participated in at participated in at participated in at participated in at participated in at least 3 hours of least 3 hours of least 3 hours of least 3 hours of least 3 hours of instructional instructional instructional instructional instructional technology PD technology PD technology PD technology PD technology PD 0% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of parents No parents have parents have parents have parents have have access to access to online access to online access to online access to online online resources resources to resources to resources to resources to to monitor monitor learning monitor learning monitor learning monitor learning learning 1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No teachers teachers were teachers were teachers were teachers were were observed observed observed observed observed integrating integrating integrating integrating integrating technology and technology and technology and technology and technology and digital learning digital learning digital learning digital learning digital learning resources resources resources resources resources 1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No students students have students have students have students have have access to access to access to access to access to technology for technology for technology for technology for technology for learning in the learning in the learning in the learning in the learning in the classroom classroom classroom classroom classroom
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Dropout Prevention Strategies Indicators Does the campus offer clubs/organizations for students? 1
2
Examples: Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate, Kung Foo Club, Newsletter Club, Student Council, National Junior Honor Society, Mustangs on the Move
Does the campus offer multiple opportunities for students to participate in college/career readiness activities? Example: career day, career explorations, college days, monthly guidance lessons, Advisory period
Does the campus actively review campus attendance data? 3
4
Data Sources: TxEIS, eSPED, individual student documentation with pattern of absences, daily review of absences and parent communication, teacher review every three week grading period, PBIS
Does the campus attempt to schedule conferences with parents/students who are having attendance issues?
0
1
No clubs/organ-‐ izations offered
2
3
1 to 2 3 to 4 5 to 6 clubs/organ-‐ clubs/organ-‐ clubs/organ-‐ izations offered izations offered izations offered
4 7 or more clubs/organ-‐ izations offered
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No students students students students students participated in a participated in at participated in at participated in at participated in at CCR activity least 1 CCR least 1 CCR least 1 CCR least 1 CCR activity activity activity activity No regular reviews
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
No regular attempts
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-‐17 Campus District
Nixon-‐Smiley Middle School Nixon-‐Smiley CISD
Gifted and Talented Indicators Do teachers on campus meet minumum state GT training requirements? 1
Do parents of GT students have opportunities to learn about the GT program 2 during the school year? Examples: Letter home, GT Showcase Event(s)
0
1
2
3
4
100% of GT 100% of GT < 100% GT 100% of GT GT teachers did teachers met teachers met teachers met teachers met not meet state state state state minimum state requirements requirements requirements of requirements of GT training plus 6 or more plus 12 or more 12 hours of 12 hours of requirements additional hours additional hours training training of training of training The campus did 7 or more not provide 1 or 2 identified 3 or 4 identified 5 or 6 identified identified information opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities about the GT were provided to were provided to were provided to were provided to program to parents parents parents parents parents
Is the GT curriculum designed to meet the social, emotional, and learning needs of No identified 1 to 2 identified 3 to 4 identified 5 to 6 identified More than 7 the gifted including opportunities such as project-‐based learning, collaborative types of types of types of types of identified types opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities of opportunities 3 team-‐work, learning perseverance, time management, organization, and goal were provided to were provided to were provided to were provided to were provided to setting? Examples: Mock election, create perfect utopia,"Was Museum" -‐ significance person made in world, work individually, pairs, small groups, class decides topics and how far to delve into topics,
students
students
students
students
students
Overall Program Score A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-‐18)
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-‐17)
ool
Grade that WOULD BE ASSIGNED IF his were 2017-‐18 A A A A A A A B
ool
Score 4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
2
4
4
3.5 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 3
4
4
3.7 A Exemplary
ool
Score
4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score 4
4
4
4
4.0 A Exemplary
ool
Score
3
2
3
2.7 B Recognized
