Convective Extremes

Report 2 Downloads 100 Views
Convective Extremes Debbie Abbs Contributions from: Tony Rafter, Mohar Chattopadhyay, Will Thurston, Sally Lavender, Todd Lane, John Allen, Bertrand Timbal, James Gilmore, ACCESS Team

Introduction  

  

 

Understanding weather (thunderstorms, ECLs, coincident events Detection Model selection (importance of sampling) Sensitivity studies (importance of model physics) Downscaling for climate change applications Statistical analysis Future plans

Severe Thunderstorms (Allen) Australian



Australian-based discriminant analysis using MesoLAPS proximity soundings



Application to GCM outputs



Impact of climate change

Brooks et al (2003) 90% POD Related work: Timbal - Cool season tornadoes Abbs – Severe storm environments in Mk3.5

East Coast Lows (Timbal) 

Early results show that the best performing diagnostic of ECL risk of formation (Laplacien of the geopotential height: a measure of the tropopause dip) provide similar results with high resolution ECMWF interim reanalyses and coarse resolution NCEP/NCAR reanalyses (i.e.: robust to model resolution): Location of maximum value of the Laplacien of Geop. H. when ECL are observed With ECMWF interim

With NCEP/NCAR

TC and rainfall (Lavender)

Coincident Events (Abbs)

A first step in the development of projections

Detection → Sampling (a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Muib_echo_g

Sampling - genealogy (Chattopadhyay) Bccr_bcm2_0

Csiro_mk3_5

Giss_e_r

inmcm3

Cccma_1

echam5

hadcm3

Ipsl_cm4

Cnrm_cm3

Csiro_mk3_0

Gfdl_2_0

Gfdl_2_1

hadgem1

Ingv_echam4

Miroc_medres

Mri_cgcm2

Masson, D. and R. Knutti, 2011: Climate model genealogy. Geophys Res Letters, 38. (Published 23 April, 2011) “Strong similarities are seen between models developed at the same institution, between models sharing versions 8 of the same atmospheric component, and between successive versions of the same model.



Modelling studies Convection over Darwin (~1km) (Lane) focussing on the dynamics and evaluating how well the simulations represent the deepest convective events and intense precipitation

Qld Floods: Experimental 1.5 km → operations (Wang & Steinle)

ECLs (10 km) (Gilmour) Sensitivity of ECL precip to different physics in WRF

Modelling studies 2009 ECL (Thurston)

2007 Pasha Bulker ECL (Abbs)

What is responsible for the development of small scale circulations. Shear instability vs. convective instability?

High-res modelling for climate change (TCs) Maximum Wind Speed 35

Occurrence (%)

30 25 20

current

15

2070

Maximum wind speed: 1 grid value per storm

10 5 0 2.5

7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5 27.5 32.5 37.5 42.5 47.5 52.5 Wind Speed (m/s)

IKE_18 Max

Integrated kinetic energy

30

Powell & Reinhold (2007)

Occurrence (%)

25 20 current

15

2070

10 5

Katerina

0 5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95 105 115

Maximum Integrated Kinetic Energy (TJ)

Measure of destructive potential Incorporates effects of storm size

Convective Extremes & Statistics (Rafter)

Return period curves

Depth-area curves

Future plans 1. 2. 3.

Adapt other N.W.P. diagnostics to climate change related research Synoptic drivers of extreme rainfall & coincident surge events – objective and seamless descriptors. New CMIP5 simulations 1. 2. 3. 4.

4.

ACCESS model 1. 2.

5.

7. 8.

ECLs (risk of formation, impact of large scale forcing on formation and genesis, impact of climate change) Application of ACCESS to downscaling of convective extremes in CMIP5 outputs

Downscaling for convective extremes 1. 2.

6.

Update projections (ECL, severe thunderstorms) Applied additional diagnostics regarding extreme weather events Extended rainfall events (across the ESB) Strong wind perpendicular to the coast

Driven with CMIP5 outputs Multi-model framework (RAMS, WRF, ACCESS …) to minimise sampling issues

Improved statistical analysis of downscaled outputs Development of projections (TCs) based on multiple analysis methods ………………….