UNDER THE MICR SC PE N.Y.P.D crime lab’s hair-and-fibre unit can’t make promises; at best, it can give a likely answer. The world’s fascination with TV shows like CSI has many asking “Why?”
By Jeffrey Toobin
ͳͲǡʹͲͲ͵ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ -‐ Ǧͻ Ǥ ϐ ϐ ǡ ǡ ϐϐ Ǥ ǯǡ ǡ Ǥ ϐǡ ǡ ǤǤǤǤ ǯǦǦϐǡǯǡǤ Under questioning in Brooklyn federal court, Faber said that she had compared samples of fabric ǯ ϐǡǡ night of the crime. The prosecutor asked Faber to describe the methods and equipment she had used to make her analysis. ǤDz ϐ ǡǡȀ ǡdz ǤϐDz-‐ Ǯ ǯdz Ǥ ǯ Ȅϐ Ǥ -‐ ǡǤ ǯ Ǥ ǡ ϐ Ǧ ǯ Ǥ ǯ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǤDz ǡ ǯ ǡdz ǤDz ϐ Ǥ Ǯ ǯǦǤdz Dz ǣ ǡdzǡȄDz ǣdzDz ǣdzȄ Ǥȋ Dz ǣdz
most popular program in the world.) In large part because of the series’ success, Faber’s profession has acquired an air of glamour, and its practitioners an aura of infallibility. “I just met with the conference of Louisiana judges, and, when I asked if ‘CSI’ ϐ ǡǡdz Carol Henderson, the director of the National Clearinghouse for Sci-‐ ǡ ǡǡ ǡǤ Dz Ǥdz ǡ the number of job applications has increased dramatically in the past few years. In the pilot for the series, which was broadcast in 2000, Gil Grissom, the ϐ ǡǡ comparing toenail clippings. “If I can match the nail in the sneaker to the sus-‐ ǯ ǤǤǤdz ǡǤ ǡ ǤDz ǡdzǤǡ ȋ Ȍ ǡǡDz ϐ Ǧ Ǥ Ǥdz ϐ Ǧ ǤDz Ǯ ǡǯdz ǡǦǦǦǡǤDzǤǡ Ǯ ǡǯǮǡǯǮ ǯǮ Ǥǯdz Ǧ Dz dzȄ ǡǡ-‐ ǡϐǡ ǡϐȄ ϐ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǦǦǡ ǦȄ Ǧ Ȅ ǡ ǡ-‐ ǡ ϐǡ Ǥ ͳͻͻǡ ǡDz -‐ ǡ Ǥdz ϐ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ ǤǤ Ǥǡϐ ǡ Ǧ chairs, Harry T. Edwards, a senior federal-‐appeals-‐court judge. “It sounds like there is a lot of impressionistic and ǡdzǡ ǤDz Ǧ Continued on page 23.
William Petersen (Dr. Gil Grissom) and the rest of the CSI TV gang analyze DNA, hair, fibre and even a toenail or two at times. Most of these will reveal a perfect match. The glory of TV allows them to do this, but the real world does not.
Lisa Faber uses the best of available technology to determine if a stand of hair or fibre will help reach any conclusions. Even with what seems to be a perfect match, she can only speculate.