DEPLOYMENT OF ALTERNATIVE MOTOR FUELS

Report 5 Downloads 203 Views
DEPLOYMENT OF ALTERNATIVE MOTOR FUELS Nils-Olof Nylund IEA Advanced Motor Fuels 8-9. October 2007

MAJOR CHALLENGES IN ROAD TRANSPORT 

Local pollution –





Greenhouse gas emissions –





transport related GHG emissions are increasing energy savings is the most efficient measure to reduce GHG

Resource constraints – –



technology will solve this problem on developed markets still a problem for many years to come in emerging markets

road transport 97 % dependent on oil the price of oil is rocketing

Congestion –

at one point we have to start discussing reduction of traffic flows, spatial planning, public transport and modal shift Tabata 2005 2

IEA AMF STRATEGIC PLAN 2005-2009 

“Advanced Motor Fuels” have been defined as fuels fulfilling one or more of the following criteria:

1. Low toxic emissions 2. Improved life-cycle efficiency 3. Reduced greenhouse gas emissions/utilisation of renewable energy sources 4. Enabling fuels for new propulsion systems 

For the 2005-2009 Strategic Plan, two additional, partly overlapping criteria are added:

5. Fuels contributing to sustainability in transportation 6. Fuels contributing to security of supply

3

FUEL REQUIREMENTS/CHARACTERISTICS 

Clean and efficient engines need high quality fuels –

– –



good combustion properties (high octane for petrol, high cetane for diesel) no lead, no sulphur good situation in e.g. Europe, Japan and North America

Enabling fuels –







lead-free fuel for exhaust aftertreatment petrol vehicles sulphur-free fuel for exhaust aftertreatment in diesel vehicles synthetic fuels for new combustion systems hydrogen for fuel cell vehicles

Godwin 2006

4

REASONS TO PROMOTE ALTERNATIVE FUELS



Increased security of supply



Reduced CO2 emissions



Reduced local emissions



New income possibilities for rural areas (biofuels)

5

TRANSPORTATION FUEL VOLUMES 

World transport fuel consumption 1,600 Mtoe



Contribution of alternative fuels (approximate figures) – – – – – –

ethanol 18 Mtoe LPG 17 Mtoe CNG 12 Mtoe biodiesel 4 Mtoe methanol 3 Mtoe GTL 1 Mtoe



Alternative fuels in total 55 Mtoe or 3.4 %



Biofuels in total 22 Mtoe or 1.4 %

6

BIOFUELS ARE GROWING RAPIDLY EU BIOFUELS PRODUCTION IN MTOE/A 6

5

Mtoe/a

4 Bioethanol

3

Biodiesel

2

1

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Ethanol dominates worldwide, biodiesel in Europe

IFP Panorama 2007 7

MOST IMPORTANT MARKETS FOR ALTERNATIVE FUELS 

Ethanol –



Biodiesel –



+100,000 vehicle countries Argentina, Pakistan, Brazil, Italy, India, Iran, Colombia, USA, China

LPG –



France and Germany

Natural gas –



Brazil & USA

rather evenly distributed

Methanol –

volumes have gone down due to the MTBE ban is USA

8

Brazilian ethanol vehicle sales (IFP Panorama 2007) World NGV numbers (IANGV)

9

WHICH ARE THE DRIVERS FOR ALTERNATIVE FUELS? 

Mandates to use alternative fuels –

e.g. Europe (biofuels) and USA (fleets)



Tax incentives for alternative fuels



Subsidies for AF vehicles and infrastructure



Benefits for AF vehicles –



free parking, access to bus lanes etc.

A fuel which is cheaper than petrol and diesel –

natural gas and LPG

10

CASE SWEDEN/STOCKHOLM 

Tax incentives for biofuels



Mandates for fuel retailers to provide alternative fuels (>600 stations)



Subsidy for procurement (10,000 SEK)



Reduced taxation value for company cars



Free parking for low-emission vehicles



Quittance from congestion fees for low-emission vehicles



Definition of low-emission cars: – – – –

vehicles fuelled on ethanol (E85) or methane electric vehicles petrol, diesel and hybrid vehicle emitting less than 120 g CO2/km additional requirement for low particle emissions 11

SWEDISH VEHICLE NUMBERS 2000 LD vehicles Electric 600 Hybrids 250 Fuel efficient 280 Methane 1500 Ethanol (FFV) 250 HD vehicles Ethanol Methane Electric/FC Ethanol in gasoline Ethanol in FFVs Ethanol in buses Biogas Natural gas Biodiesel in diesel Other alternative fuels

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006 Share of energy

350 840 1640 890

500 530 970 2500 3500

450 620 1260 3440 7980

400 1350 2080 4500 13300

360 3300 2300 6500 21400

325 6100 7000 10500 46700

400 680 17

380 780 18

370 900 13

490 1100 9 1.7 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 0.1 %

12

EVALUATION OF FUEL ALTERNATIVES



Vehicle performance –





Fuel cost –



concentration of ethanol and FAME (conventional biodiesel) limited to max 10 % unless used in dedicated vehicles vehicles should comply with emission regulations also when running on alternative fuels!

fuel cost per unit of energy content

Cost for infrastructure and vehicles –

substantial e.g. for natural gas, not to mention hydrogen and fuel cells



Well-to-wheel energy efficiency



Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions 13

Demands on Future Fuels e n i l o gas l e s die

biod iese l LPG

l o n a h et

DME

meth anol

natura l gas hydro gen

Diversification on the fuels side is economically unacceptable Blending relating to existing fuel specification methanol, ethanol, biodiesel

Diversification on the primary energy side from crude oil to natural gas, coal and biomass z

to blend into existing fuels

Group Research Powertrain

Frank Seyfried 2005

VOLKSWAGEN AG

THE BIOFUELS DILEMMA



So far only first generation biofuels have been available –

– –





with the exception of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil first generation biofuels do not provide significant GHG reductions feedstock for fuel production is in competition with food maintaining fuel quality only allows blending of limited amounts into petrol and diesel

OECD recently published a report on biofuels with the title “Is the cure worse than the disease?” New types of biofuels, so-called second generation biofuels are needed for enhanced GHG and vehicle performance –

BTL fuels based on solid biomass expected in the market 2010 - 2015



Sufficiency of biomass feedstock will always be a restricting factor



Sustainability criteria for biofuels are being developed 15

TRENDS IN BIOFUELS

*

“Synthetic 2nd generation fuels” HVO= hydrotreated vegetable oil (e.g. NExBTL) BTL= biomass-to-liquids

Hermann 2006

*Many experts consider biogas a viable option

COST OF FUELS

IFP Panorama 2007

CNG is typically sold at 50 % of petrol retail price

17

DEVELOPMENT OF ETHANOL PRODUCTION AND PRICE IN BRAZIL

UN/ECLAC 2007 18

BIOFUELS AND SYNFUELS ARE ENERGY INTENSIVE

WTT= well-to-tank TTW= tank-to-wheel

EUCAR/JRC/CONCAWE 2007

19

REDUCTION OF GHG

OECD 2007 20

SUMMARY 

Currently there is a surge for biofuels in both Europe and North America –







Natural gas as a vehicle fuel is growing in Asia and South America Depending on the fuel, deployment may be restricted either by infrastructure, vehicle compatibility or by fuel availability In Europe and North America alternative fuels have been brought to the market using tax incentives, subsidies and mandates –







ethanol dominates on the world level, biodiesel in Europe

most alternatives will increase costs

Not all current biofuels meet the requirements for sustainability, GHG reductions, cost effectiveness and vehicle performance Most experts recommend development of second-generation biofuels for enhanced GHG and vehicle performance Fuel quality requirements will continue to tighten with developments in engine and exhaust after-treatment technology 21