Deviance as a Situated Phenomenon: Variations in the Social Interpretation of Marijuana and Alcohol Use Orcutt Deviance as a 3 step process Community or society interprets a behaviour as deviant Defines a certain person to be a certain type of deviant Give them a treatment appropriate to their deviant label 3 Situational Conditions which influence interpretations of deviance Hostility toward a person influences the extent to which behaviour is perceived How much it interferes with situational goals How stable the behaviour is What the motivations were of the user Marijuana Situational goals How drugs interfere with a task situation Marijuana use considered deviant in task settings Alcohol as seen as more accepted in task settings Eg. Getting drinks with clients Considered less deviant in party settings Socioemotional situation Drug use is consistent with the goals of a certain situation, such as a party Situational causes are given more excuses for a deviant act Stability – intersituational pattern Stable pattern of repeated occurrences across several situations More likely to be considered deviant Intrasituational Single, situated occurrence Social and Personal Motivations (intra situational vs. intersituational) Personal motivations are seen as an individuals attempt to cope with situations More likely to be interpreted as deviant With personal motivations for doing drugs or alcohol, people viewed using alcohol for personal motivation (eg easing stress) as more deviant than personal motivation to smoke Alcohol is more accepted with social motivations over personal motivations