Global Stratification 02-13-2013

Report 16 Downloads 68 Views
Global Stratification

02-13-2013

In Class (56) Notes

02-13-2013

Global Stratification Global Patterns of Social Inequality Terminology  Post WWII o First World: high income, industrial o Second World: socialist o Third World: non-industrialized, low income  Present o High, Middle, Low Income Countries o Decide on basis of economic development o Not political systems Global Class Structure  See map 9-1, p231 o Economic Development in Global Perspective o High, Middle, Low Income countries o Low income – mostly in Africa o Distribution of Income  See map 9-1, p234 

o Wealth and Well-Being in Global Perspective See map 9-2, p234

High Income Countries  2010: 18% world‟s people (1.2 billion) live in wealth  income US #13,000-35,000  Where: North America, Europe, Australia, Western Europe, Japan (60 countries)  Enjoy 60% of world‟s income – shows imbalance  High-technology (industrial and information economy), urbanized, control world‟s financial markets Middle Income Countries  68% world‟s people (approx.. 4.8 billion)  Annual incomes: US $2,000-18,000  Where: Latin and South America, Former Socialist Countries, China (101 countries)  Some urbanization, limited industrialization  Still much agrarian life



Often densely populated, but depends on

Low Income Countries  14% world‟s people – 15% of world‟s land  less than $3,000/year  Central and East Africa, Asia  Limited industrial technology  Mostly peasant farming – ½ live in cities  Massive poverty, disease and hunger are common Why does global poverty exist?  Technology o ¼ of people in low income countries use human or animal power to farm land 

Population growth



Cultural patterns: Resist Innovations o Get rid of cultural beliefs that are holding them back from embracing new technology



Social stratification o Low income countries distribute wealth very unequally



Gender Inequality: must improve women‟s standing



Global power relationships (in historical sense – Colonialism) o Colonialism – political/economical control of other nations o Neocolonialism – new modern form of colonialism  Not direct political control 

Economic exploitation by multinational corporations

Theoretical Explanations for Global Class Structure Modernization Theory o Global inequalities due to technological and cultural differences o Political context is important:  Emerged 1950s  Structural functionalist base  Develop foreign policy emphasizing capitalism and free markets



Aim: counter Soviet Union and threat of socialism spreading to other parts of the world

o Historical perspective:  Until recently, entire world was poor  Therefore, there is a need to explain affluence (period of affluence)  Focus on period of Industrial Revolution  See technology + “Spirit of Capitalism”  Development = Industrial technology + Anti-traditional Culture o Tradition: greatest barrier to economic development  Includes strong family ties and reverence for the past o Max    

Weber: Protestant Reformation Reshaped traditional Catholic beliefs Wealth is a sign of personal virtue Individualism replacing importance of community and family Aspiring to improve yourself to gain access to wealth

o W.W. Rowtow‟s Stages of Modernization – implies that growth always takes place    

Traditional Take-off Drive to technological maturity Mass consumption

o Role of high-income countries – aid in advancement  Control populations – birth control, sex education  Increase in food production – The Green Revolution – ways in which farming was done in industrial countries  

Introduce industrial technology Provide foreign aid

o Criticisms of Modernization Theory  Provides some defense of capitalism  Modernization doesn‟t always take place in low-income countries  Not inevitable progression of stages  High-income countries often block development of low-income countries  Status quo work in their favor









High income countries industrialized from a position of global strength. Can we expect low-income countries to go the same

in a position of global weakness? Impact of international relations:  See figure 9.4 “Africa‟s Colonial History” page 243  Must recognize impact of colonialism Ethnocentric  Should the most developed countries really be the standard?  Where are the resources going to come from? Blames the victim  Causes of global poverty seen emanating from within lowincome societies

Dependency Theory o Global inequality due to historical exploitation of low-income countries by those better off o Social conflict basis o Global poverty generated by high-income countries – results:  Systematic impoverished of low-income countries for centuries  Dependence of high-income countries o Andre Gunder Frank: You can only have development if there is underdevelopment  Underdevelopment necessary  No “linear path of progress:  Colonial process aided development  Simultaneously created underdevelopment o Domination begins with colonialism, continues with neo-colonialism o Immanuel Wallerstein:  „Core‟ exploitation „periphery‟ through…  Resource extraction  Inhibition of development  Cycle of debt Dependency involves… o Resource extraction  Originally: raw materials/slaves

 

Now: raw materials/cheap labour Result: narrow, export-oriented economies

 Prevents viable industrial base  Limits production of staples for local consumption o Cycle of debt: unequal trade relations o ***Get slides***