99° 40' 4''
99° 38' 11''
Nonirrigated Capability Class—Greer County, Oklahoma (Greer Tracts)
440100
440400
32
440700
441000
441300
HdmC
AF B
TipA
3866700
g Md
3867000
HS
HSAF
3866400
GlGB
WtlB
3865500
EdsD
SuwA
E1440 Rd
MktB
MktC2
7
ee k
3866100
VeKE
MktC2
KoBE
MktB
KcRG
8
439200 99° 40' 3''
Cr TlvB
3865800
3865800
GlGB
GlsB
34° 55' 41''
Jo hn Sl e
SuuA
3865500
GlsD
439500
439800
440100
Map Scale: 1:13,700 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet.
0
150
300
600
0
500
1,000
2,000
Natural Resources Conservation Service
4
WtlB
ep y
EdsD
BekA
5
N1865 Rd
T5N R23W
GlGB
GlG B
3866100
GlGB
6
34° 56' 43''
33
T6N R23W HdmC
441600
3866700
E1430 Rd
3867000
31
439800
3866400
439500
440400
9 440700
Meters 900 Feet 3,000
Web Soil Survey 2.2 National Cooperative Soil Survey
441000
441300
34° 55' 41''
441600 99° 38' 10''
439200
34° 56' 43''
5/7/2009 Page 1 of 4
Nonirrigated Capability Class–Greer County, Oklahoma (Greer Tracts)
MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI)
MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:13,700 if printed on A size (8.5" × 11") sheet.
Local Roads
Area of Interest (AOI)
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Soils
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements.
Soil Map Units Soil Ratings
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 14N NAD83
Capability Class - I Capability Class - II
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V
Soil Survey Area: Greer County, Oklahoma Survey Area Data: Version 9, Sep 11, 2008
Capability Class - VI
Date(s) aerial images were photographed:
Capability Class - VII
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available
6/6/2003
Political Features Cities PLSS Township and Range PLSS Section Water Features Oceans Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 2.2 National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/7/2009 Page 2 of 4
Nonirrigated Capability Class–Greer County, Oklahoma
Greer Tracts
Nonirrigated Capability Class
Nonirrigated Capability Class— Summary by Map Unit — Greer County, Oklahoma Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BekA
Beckman silty clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
4
5.4
1.1%
EdsD
Eda sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes
4
22.1
4.6%
GlGB
Grandmore and Grandfield loamy sands, 0 3 to 3 percent slopes
41.3
8.7%
GlsB
Grandfield loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
3
13.2
2.8%
GlsD
Grandfield loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes
4
21.9
4.6%
HdmC
Hardeman fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent 3 slopes
4.8
1.0%
HSAF
Hardeman-Southside-Arnett complex, 3 to 6 20 percent slopes
36.7
7.7%
KcRG
Knoco soils and Rock outcrop, 12 to 40 percent slopes
7
1.7
0.4%
KoBE
Knoco-Badland complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes
6
37.9
8.0%
MdgB
Madge fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
2
5.8
1.2%
MktB
McKnight loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
3
2.1
0.4%
MktC2
McKnight loamy fine sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded
4
24.6
5.2%
SuuA
Spur clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
2
143.8
30.3%
SuwA
Spur clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded
5
4.8
1.0%
TipA
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes
1
48.6
10.2%
TlvB
Tilvern clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
3
22.2
4.7%
VeKE
Vernon-Knoco complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes
6
19.8
4.2%
WtlB
Westill clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
3
18.5
3.9%
474.9
100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 2.2 National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/7/2009 Page 3 of 4
Nonirrigated Capability Class–Greer County, Oklahoma
Greer Tracts
Description Land capability classification shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field crops. Crops that require special management are excluded. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops, the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to management. The criteria used in grouping the soils do not include major and generally expensive landforming that would change slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils, nor do they include possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Capability classification is not a substitute for interpretations that show suitability and limitations of groups of soils for rangeland, for woodland, or for engineering purposes. In the capability system, soils are generally grouped at three levels-capability class, subclass, and unit. Only class and subclass are included in this data set. Capability classes, the broadest groups, are designated by the numbers 1 through 8. The numbers indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices. Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require special conservation practices, or both. Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. Class 5 soils are subject to little or no erosion but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 8 soils and miscellaneous areas have limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes.
Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 2.2 National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/7/2009 Page 4 of 4