ISO 5011 Test Results for 75-5053.xlsx - NetSuite
ISO 5011, Second Edition Performance Testing: Inlet Air Cleaning Equipment for Combustion Engines & Compressors S&B Filters, Inc. ● 15461 Slover Avenue ● Fontana, California 92337 ● (909) 947-0015 ● (909) 947-0603 ● www.sbfilters.com
ISO 5011, Second Edition Air Filter or Intake Kit Test Report The test data presented in the following report represents the restriction of airflow, efficiency and dust loading capacity. The filters tested were procured from various distributors or provided by customers. The tests were performed in accordance with ISO 5011. The following were measured in accordance with the test: (1) Pressure Drop for Clean Element, Initial Efficiency and Dust Loading Capacity. The Flow Rate used to conduct the Dust Loading and Capacity test(s) is listed under the Average Environmental Conditions and Test Specifications. PTI ISO Course Test Dust was utilized and the particle data sheet for the batch is attached. The test sequence begins with measuring the pressure drop of a clean filter as a function of the airflow rate which is measured in cubic feet per minute (CFM). Subsequently, the cumulative efficiency and dust loading capacity are measured. The termination point when measuring for capacity is shown at the bottom of the report under the heading Termination ^P. The results of the tests are recorded in the top table and charts shown on the next page. The filters are inspected before and after the tests are performed. The Top Table demonstrates the results of the testing for up to three (3) samples per filter type (part number). The Efficiency represents the amount of dust (contaminants) that was stopped by the filter during each test. The Capacity measures the dust holding capability of the filter. During the test, the filter is loaded with dust until it reaches a terminal pressure drop increase of 10 inches of water (28”H2O for Heavy Duty Vehicles) across the filter element (please refer to the Average Environmental Conditions and Test Specifications at the bottom of the next page to verify the pressure drop utilized on this particular test). The Line Graph shows the pressure drop as a function of the airflow rate for the clean filter(s). The computer controlled test equipment initiates the test at close to zero (0) cubic feet per minute (CFM) and then increases the CFM gradually until the CFM termination point is reached. During the test, the restriction of the filter is measured in inches of water (“H2O) as it relates to the air flow rate (CFM). Visual inspections of filters are performed to insure against dust leakage and manufacturing flaws. The Bar Graph illustrates the cumulative efficiency for the filter(s) tested. Definition of Terms & Test Protocol Restriction Restriction measures how difficult it is for the air to get through the filter and is measured in inches of H2O. Instead of referring to restriction, the industry uses "air flow" to describe the effect of restriction. They say for example, that a High Performance Filter "flows better" than the OEM paper filter. On a line graph, the lower the restriction of a filter the better the air flow. Efficiency Efficiency is measured in % and is the amount of dirt/contaminants that the filter stops from going into the engine. Capacity Capacity is the total amount of contaminants/dirt the filter will hold before reaching its termination point. The termination point is a predefined restriction point that is used as the cut-off point when measuring how much dirt a filter will hold. For typical vehicles, 10”H2O is used at the termination point. For heavy duty trucks, this number is 28”H2O. Note: Testing was conducted based on the ISO 5011 testing standard; however, variances from the actual test procedures may exist. The intent of the testing is to show comparative test results between various products that are intended for similar use. Tests are conducted under a climate controlled environment; however, changes in temperature and humidity between tests may occur which could alter the actual test results. ISO 5011Test Results Explanation - Course Test Dust.doc
ISO 5011 Test Report for 75-‐5053 & 75-‐5053D vs OE June 22, 2011
Test Summary Filter Tested
Improvement in Airflow vs Stock Resistance to Flow @ 580 CFM 34.0% 32.0% -
75-‐5053 (w/ Cleanable Filter) 75-‐5053D (w/ Dry Disposable Filter) OE - Stock System
Efficiency Rate
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading @ Approx 131 grams 14.6% 19.0% -
Conducted at Vehicle's Max Rated Flow (580 CFM) 99.57% 99.54% 99.85%
Airflow Analysis
Filter Mfg. & Part No. Filter #1 S&B (Cleanable) 75-5053
Air Flow scfm 0.0 290.6 433.6 584.9 724.5 870.3
Net Restriction (Inches of H2O) 0.0 1.9 4.0 6.8 10.4 14.6
Filter #2 OE Stock System
0.0 290.0 436.3 578.3 721.7 871.7
0.0 2.9 6.1 10.3 15.9 22.7
Filter #3 S&B (Dry) 75-5053D
0.0 290.1 437.4 578.9 731.7 866.3
0.000 2.000 4.000 7.000 10.600 14.900
Average Environmental Conditions & Specifications
% Less Restrictive than OE 0.0% 34.5% 34.4% 34.0% 34.6% 35.7%
Temperature Relative Humidity Baro Pressure Test Stand Inlet Size Housing Contaminant Contam. Lot # Dust Feed Rate Rated Flow
0.0% 31.0% 34.4% 32.0% 33.3% 34.4%
Test
71.00 deg F 52.73 % 28.94 mmHg #1 inches Intake Course 10929C 16.24 grams/minute 580 cfm
This report represents results of airflow, efficiency and capacity tesLng conducted at S&B Filters' climate controled laboratory. TesLng was in accordance with the internaLonally accepted ISO 5011 FiltraLon Test Standard.
Resistance to Flow 25.0
Restric2on "H2O
20.0
15.0
75-‐5053 OE 75-‐5053D 10.0
5.0
0.0 0.0
290.1
437.4
578.9
731.7
866.3
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: At 580 cfm, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter was 34.0% less restricLve offering beVer airflow than the stock system. The S&B Intake with a Dry Disposable Filter was 32.0% less restricLve.
Page 1 of 2
Air Filter Capacity & Effeciency Test Report Filter Initial Restriction Mfg. & Part No. ("H2O) Filter #1 7.30 S&B (Cleanable) 75-5053
Capacity (grams) 229.5
Efficiency (%) 99.57
Restriction (H2O) 7.30 7.63 7.81 8.35 9.05 10.50 13.48 20.49
Dust Fed (grams) 0.0 33.2 65.9 98.6 131.0 164.4 197.4 230.5
Time (minutes) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Filter #2 OE Stock System
9.59
653.4
99.85
9.59 10.14 10.60 11.03 11.72 12.52 13.55 14.71 16.04 17.92 20.59
0.0 66.0 131.5 197.0 261.3 327.3 392.2 457.6 523.7 589.1 654.4
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
Filter #3 S&B (Dry) 75-5053D
7.44
293.6
99.54
7.44 7.55 7.81 8.10 8.59 9.18 10.28 11.78 14.10 17.90
0.0 33.0 65.7 98.1 131.0 164.0 197.2 230.3 262.2 295.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading 25.00
Restric2on "H2O
20.00
15.00 75-‐5053 Stock System 75-‐5053D
10.00
5.00
0.00 0.0
33.0
65.7
98.1
131.0
164.0
197.2
230.3
262.2
295.0
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: During the dust loading process, restricLon is measured to assess the airflow. This accelerated test simulates how the filter performs as it accumlates dirt in real world condiLons. A[er 131 grams of dust was applied, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter flowed 14.6% beVer than stock under like condiLons. With the Dry Disposible Filter, this same intake was 19.0% beVer than the stock system. With this intake, the S&B Dry Disposible Filter performed beVer than the Cleanable CoVon Filter during the Dust Loading Test as it maintained a lower restricLon level for a longer period of Lme. With that said, the Cleanable Filter can be cleaned more frequently which restores the filter to almost new condiLon in terms of performance. Page 2 of 2
ISO 5011 Test Report for 75-‐5053 & 75-‐5053D vs Banks June 22, 2011
Test Summary Filter Tested
Improvement in Airflow vs Banks
75-‐5053 (w/ Cleanable Filter) 75-‐5053D (w/ Dry Disposable Filter) Banks Intake # 42215
Resistance to Flow @ an average of 581 CFM 19.0% 16.7% -
Efficiency Rate
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading @ Approx 131 grams 10.3% 14.9% -
Conducted at Vehicle's Max Rated Flow (580 CFM) 99.57% 99.54% 99.49%
Airflow Analysis
Filter Mfg. & Part No. Filter #1 S&B (Cleanable) S&B 75-5053
Air Flow scfm 0.0 290.6 433.6 584.9 724.5 870.3
Net Restriction (Inches of H2O) 0.0 1.9 4.0 6.8 10.4 14.6
Filter #2 Banks 42215
0.0 289.4 437.2 582.0 719.3 862.0
0.0 2.2 4.8 8.4 12.8 18.1
0.0 290.1 437.4 578.9 731.7 866.3
0.000 2.000 4.000 7.000 10.600 14.900
Filter #3 S&B (Dry) S&B 75-5053D
Average Environmental Conditions & Specifications
% Less Restrictive than OE 0.0% 13.6% 16.7% 19.0% 18.8% 19.3%
Temperature Relative Humidity Baro Pressure Test Stand Inlet Size Housing Contaminant Contam. Lot # Dust Feed Rate Rated Flow
Test
71.47 deg F 52.83 % 28.98 mmHg #1 inches Intake Course 10929C 16.24 grams/minute 580 cfm
This report represents results of airflow, efficiency and capacity tesNng conducted at S&B Filters' climate controled laboratory. TesNng was in accordance with the internaNonally accepted ISO 5011 FiltraNon Test Standard. Pages 1 and 2 are summaries of the test results. Should their be a discrepancy, the data on the pages labeled supporNng documentaNon should reign.
0.0% 9.1% 16.7% 16.7% 17.2% 17.7%
Resistance to Flow 20.0
18.0
16.0
Restric2on "H2O
14.0
12.0
S&B 75-‐5053
10.0
Banks S&B 75-‐5053D
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0 0.0
290.1
437.4
578.9
731.7
866.3
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: At 580 cfm, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter was 19.0% less restricNve offering beVer airflow than the Banks intake kit. The S&B Intake with a Dry Disposable Filter was 16.7% less restricNve.
Page 1 of 2
Air Filter Capacity & Effeciency Test Report Filter Mfg. & Part No. Filter #1 75-5053 S&B (Cotton)
Initial Restriction ("H2O) 7.30
Capacity (grams) 229.5
Efficiency (%) 99.57
Restriction (H2O) 7.30 7.63 7.81 8.35 9.05 10.50 13.48 20.49
Dust Fed (grams) 0.0 33.2 65.9 98.6 131.0 164.4 197.4 230.5
Time (minutes) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Filter #2 Part # 42215 Banks
7.09
195.9
99.49
7.09 7.27 7.77 8.52 10.09 14.01 21.57
0.0 32.8 65.3 98.2 131.1 164.3 197.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Filter #3 75-5053D S&B (Dry)
7.44
293.6
99.54
7.44 7.55 7.81 8.10 8.59 9.18 10.28 11.78 14.10 17.90
0.0 33.0 65.7 98.1 131.0 164.0 197.2 230.3 262.2 295.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading 25.00
Restric2on "H2O
20.00
15.00 S&B (CoVon) Banks 75-‐5053D
10.00
5.00
0.00 0.0
33.0
65.7
98.1
131.0
164.0
197.2
230.3
262.2
295.0
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: During the dust loading process, restricNon is measured to assess the airflow. This accelerated test simulates how the filter performs as it accumlates dirt in real world condiNons. A[er 131 grams of dust was applied, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter flowed 10.3% beVer than the Banks intake under like condiNons. With the Dry Disposible Filter, this same intake was 14.9% beVer than the Banks system. With this intake, the S&B Dry Disposible Filter performed beVer than the Cleanable CoVon Filter during the Dust Loading Test as it maintained a lower restricNon level for a longer period of Nme. With that said, the Cleanable Filter can be cleaned more frequently which restores the filter to almost new condiNon in terms of performance. Page 2 of 2
Supporting Documentation
Determination of Gasoline and Diesel Engine Air Consumption CFM Calculator: Enter Data in Blue Shaded Areas Engine Displacement (cubic inches) RPM at maximum horse power Cycle Factor: Enter "2" for 4 Cycle Diesel and Gasoline Enter "1" for 2 Cycle Diesel and Gasoline Volumetric Efficiency: Naturally Aspirated Gasoline & Diesel Engines Enter "0.8" Super Charged Engines Enter "1.30" Turbocharged Engines Enter "1.75"
408.8 2,800 2 1.75
Based on the information entered above, the estimated CFM of the vehicle at maximum Horse Power is:
Liters to CID Converter Liters: 6.7 Cubic Inches: 408.8 Vehicle Information Model Year 2011 Make Ford Model F250/ 350 Super-Duty Engine Specs V8 Diesel
580
CYCLE FACTOR Cycle Factor 2 1
4 Cycle Gasoline and Diesel Engine 2 Cycle Gasoline and Diesel Engine
Volumetric Efficiency (Approximate) 0.8 1.30 1.75
VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY Naturally Aspirated Gasoline & Diesel Engines Supercharged Engines Turbocharged Engines
Note: The 1.75 volumetric efficiency is applicable only at top governed engine speed under full load conditions.
EQUATION The following is a method of determining approximated gasoline and diesel engine air flow requirement: Air Flow (CFM) = Displacement (cubic inches) x 1728
RPM x Volumetric Efficiency Cycle Factor
EXAMPLE Information necessary to calculate air consumption: Ford F250 7.3L V8 Diesel Truck 4 cycle, 2800 RPM@Maximum HP, 445.4 (cubic inches) displacement, turbocharged Air Flow (CFM) :
445.4 x 1728
2800 x 1.75 = 631 CFM 2
Macintosh HD:Users:Berry:Desktop:75-5053 Zip Folder:CFM Calculator 6.7L Ford.xls
ISO 5011, Second Edition Air Filter or Intake Kit Test Report The test data presented in the following report represents the restriction of airflow, efficiency and dust loading capacity. The filters tested were procured from various distributors or provided by customers. The tests were performed in accordance with ISO 5011. The following were measured in accordance with the test: (1) Pressure Drop for Clean Element, Initial Efficiency and Dust Loading Capacity. The Flow Rate used to conduct the Dust Loading and Capacity test(s) is listed under the Average Environmental Conditions and Test Specifications. PTI ISO Course Test Dust was utilized and the particle data sheet for the batch is attached. The test sequence begins with measuring the pressure drop of a clean filter as a function of the airflow rate which is measured in cubic feet per minute (CFM). Subsequently, the cumulative efficiency and dust loading capacity are measured. The termination point when measuring for capacity is shown at the bottom of the report under the heading Termination ^P. The results of the tests are recorded in the top table and charts shown on the next page. The filters are inspected before and after the tests are performed. The Top Table demonstrates the results of the testing for up to three (3) samples per filter type (part number). The Efficiency represents the amount of dust (contaminants) that was stopped by the filter during each test. The Capacity measures the dust holding capability of the filter. During the test, the filter is loaded with dust until it reaches a terminal pressure drop increase of 10 inches of water (28”H2O for Heavy Duty Vehicles) across the filter element (please refer to the Average Environmental Conditions and Test Specifications at the bottom of the next page to verify the pressure drop utilized on this particular test). The Line Graph shows the pressure drop as a function of the airflow rate for the clean filter(s). The computer controlled test equipment initiates the test at close to zero (0) cubic feet per minute (CFM) and then increases the CFM gradually until the CFM termination point is reached. During the test, the restriction of the filter is measured in inches of water (“H2O) as it relates to the air flow rate (CFM). Visual inspections of filters are performed to insure against dust leakage and manufacturing flaws. The Bar Graph illustrates the cumulative efficiency for the filter(s) tested. Definition of Terms & Test Protocol Restriction Restriction measures how difficult it is for the air to get through the filter and is measured in inches of H2O. Instead of referring to restriction, the industry uses "air flow" to describe the effect of restriction. They say for example, that a High Performance Filter "flows better" than the OEM paper filter. On a line graph, the lower the restriction of a filter the better the air flow. Efficiency Efficiency is measured in % and is the amount of dirt/contaminants that the filter stops from going into the engine. Capacity Capacity is the total amount of contaminants/dirt the filter will hold before reaching its termination point. The termination point is a predefined restriction point that is used as the cut-off point when measuring how much dirt a filter will hold. For typical vehicles, 10”H2O is used at the termination point. For heavy duty trucks, this number is 28”H2O. Note: Testing was conducted based on the ISO 5011 testing standard; however, variances from the actual test procedures may exist. The intent of the testing is to show comparative test results between various products that are intended for similar use. Tests are conducted under a climate controlled environment; however, changes in temperature and humidity between tests may occur which could alter the actual test results. ISO 5011Test Results Explanation - Course Test Dust.doc
ISO 5011 Test Report for 75-‐5053 & 75-‐5053D vs OE June 22, 2011
Test Summary Filter Tested
Improvement in Airflow vs Stock Resistance to Flow @ 580 CFM 34.0% 32.0% -
75-‐5053 (w/ Cleanable Filter) 75-‐5053D (w/ Dry Disposable Filter) OE - Stock System
Efficiency Rate
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading @ Approx 131 grams 14.6% 19.0% -
Conducted at Vehicle's Max Rated Flow (580 CFM) 99.57% 99.54% 99.85%
Airflow Analysis
Filter Mfg. & Part No. Filter #1 S&B (Cleanable) 75-5053
Air Flow scfm 0.0 290.6 433.6 584.9 724.5 870.3
Net Restriction (Inches of H2O) 0.0 1.9 4.0 6.8 10.4 14.6
Filter #2 OE Stock System
0.0 290.0 436.3 578.3 721.7 871.7
0.0 2.9 6.1 10.3 15.9 22.7
Filter #3 S&B (Dry) 75-5053D
0.0 290.1 437.4 578.9 731.7 866.3
0.000 2.000 4.000 7.000 10.600 14.900
Average Environmental Conditions & Specifications
% Less Restrictive than OE 0.0% 34.5% 34.4% 34.0% 34.6% 35.7%
Temperature Relative Humidity Baro Pressure Test Stand Inlet Size Housing Contaminant Contam. Lot # Dust Feed Rate Rated Flow
0.0% 31.0% 34.4% 32.0% 33.3% 34.4%
Test
71.00 deg F 52.73 % 28.94 mmHg #1 inches Intake Course 10929C 16.24 grams/minute 580 cfm
This report represents results of airflow, efficiency and capacity tesLng conducted at S&B Filters' climate controled laboratory. TesLng was in accordance with the internaLonally accepted ISO 5011 FiltraLon Test Standard.
Resistance to Flow 25.0
Restric2on "H2O
20.0
15.0
75-‐5053 OE 75-‐5053D 10.0
5.0
0.0 0.0
290.1
437.4
578.9
731.7
866.3
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: At 580 cfm, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter was 34.0% less restricLve offering beVer airflow than the stock system. The S&B Intake with a Dry Disposable Filter was 32.0% less restricLve.
Page 1 of 2
Air Filter Capacity & Effeciency Test Report Filter Initial Restriction Mfg. & Part No. ("H2O) Filter #1 7.30 S&B (Cleanable) 75-5053
Capacity (grams) 229.5
Efficiency (%) 99.57
Restriction (H2O) 7.30 7.63 7.81 8.35 9.05 10.50 13.48 20.49
Dust Fed (grams) 0.0 33.2 65.9 98.6 131.0 164.4 197.4 230.5
Time (minutes) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Filter #2 OE Stock System
9.59
653.4
99.85
9.59 10.14 10.60 11.03 11.72 12.52 13.55 14.71 16.04 17.92 20.59
0.0 66.0 131.5 197.0 261.3 327.3 392.2 457.6 523.7 589.1 654.4
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
Filter #3 S&B (Dry) 75-5053D
7.44
293.6
99.54
7.44 7.55 7.81 8.10 8.59 9.18 10.28 11.78 14.10 17.90
0.0 33.0 65.7 98.1 131.0 164.0 197.2 230.3 262.2 295.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading 25.00
Restric2on "H2O
20.00
15.00 75-‐5053 Stock System 75-‐5053D
10.00
5.00
0.00 0.0
33.0
65.7
98.1
131.0
164.0
197.2
230.3
262.2
295.0
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: During the dust loading process, restricLon is measured to assess the airflow. This accelerated test simulates how the filter performs as it accumlates dirt in real world condiLons. A[er 131 grams of dust was applied, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter flowed 14.6% beVer than stock under like condiLons. With the Dry Disposible Filter, this same intake was 19.0% beVer than the stock system. With this intake, the S&B Dry Disposible Filter performed beVer than the Cleanable CoVon Filter during the Dust Loading Test as it maintained a lower restricLon level for a longer period of Lme. With that said, the Cleanable Filter can be cleaned more frequently which restores the filter to almost new condiLon in terms of performance. Page 2 of 2
ISO 5011 Test Report for 75-‐5053 & 75-‐5053D vs Banks June 22, 2011
Test Summary Filter Tested
Improvement in Airflow vs Banks
75-‐5053 (w/ Cleanable Filter) 75-‐5053D (w/ Dry Disposable Filter) Banks Intake # 42215
Resistance to Flow @ an average of 581 CFM 19.0% 16.7% -
Efficiency Rate
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading @ Approx 131 grams 10.3% 14.9% -
Conducted at Vehicle's Max Rated Flow (580 CFM) 99.57% 99.54% 99.49%
Airflow Analysis
Filter Mfg. & Part No. Filter #1 S&B (Cleanable) S&B 75-5053
Air Flow scfm 0.0 290.6 433.6 584.9 724.5 870.3
Net Restriction (Inches of H2O) 0.0 1.9 4.0 6.8 10.4 14.6
Filter #2 Banks 42215
0.0 289.4 437.2 582.0 719.3 862.0
0.0 2.2 4.8 8.4 12.8 18.1
0.0 290.1 437.4 578.9 731.7 866.3
0.000 2.000 4.000 7.000 10.600 14.900
Filter #3 S&B (Dry) S&B 75-5053D
Average Environmental Conditions & Specifications
% Less Restrictive than OE 0.0% 13.6% 16.7% 19.0% 18.8% 19.3%
Temperature Relative Humidity Baro Pressure Test Stand Inlet Size Housing Contaminant Contam. Lot # Dust Feed Rate Rated Flow
Test
71.47 deg F 52.83 % 28.98 mmHg #1 inches Intake Course 10929C 16.24 grams/minute 580 cfm
This report represents results of airflow, efficiency and capacity tesNng conducted at S&B Filters' climate controled laboratory. TesNng was in accordance with the internaNonally accepted ISO 5011 FiltraNon Test Standard. Pages 1 and 2 are summaries of the test results. Should their be a discrepancy, the data on the pages labeled supporNng documentaNon should reign.
0.0% 9.1% 16.7% 16.7% 17.2% 17.7%
Resistance to Flow 20.0
18.0
16.0
Restric2on "H2O
14.0
12.0
S&B 75-‐5053
10.0
Banks S&B 75-‐5053D
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0 0.0
290.1
437.4
578.9
731.7
866.3
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: At 580 cfm, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter was 19.0% less restricNve offering beVer airflow than the Banks intake kit. The S&B Intake with a Dry Disposable Filter was 16.7% less restricNve.
Page 1 of 2
Air Filter Capacity & Effeciency Test Report Filter Mfg. & Part No. Filter #1 75-5053 S&B (Cotton)
Initial Restriction ("H2O) 7.30
Capacity (grams) 229.5
Efficiency (%) 99.57
Restriction (H2O) 7.30 7.63 7.81 8.35 9.05 10.50 13.48 20.49
Dust Fed (grams) 0.0 33.2 65.9 98.6 131.0 164.4 197.4 230.5
Time (minutes) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Filter #2 Part # 42215 Banks
7.09
195.9
99.49
7.09 7.27 7.77 8.52 10.09 14.01 21.57
0.0 32.8 65.3 98.2 131.1 164.3 197.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Filter #3 75-5053D S&B (Dry)
7.44
293.6
99.54
7.44 7.55 7.81 8.10 8.59 9.18 10.28 11.78 14.10 17.90
0.0 33.0 65.7 98.1 131.0 164.0 197.2 230.3 262.2 295.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Resistance to Flow During Dust Loading 25.00
Restric2on "H2O
20.00
15.00 S&B (CoVon) Banks 75-‐5053D
10.00
5.00
0.00 0.0
33.0
65.7
98.1
131.0
164.0
197.2
230.3
262.2
295.0
Flow Rate SCFM Comments: During the dust loading process, restricNon is measured to assess the airflow. This accelerated test simulates how the filter performs as it accumlates dirt in real world condiNons. A[er 131 grams of dust was applied, the S&B Intake with a Cleanable CoVon Filter flowed 10.3% beVer than the Banks intake under like condiNons. With the Dry Disposible Filter, this same intake was 14.9% beVer than the Banks system. With this intake, the S&B Dry Disposible Filter performed beVer than the Cleanable CoVon Filter during the Dust Loading Test as it maintained a lower restricNon level for a longer period of Nme. With that said, the Cleanable Filter can be cleaned more frequently which restores the filter to almost new condiNon in terms of performance. Page 2 of 2
Supporting Documentation
Determination of Gasoline and Diesel Engine Air Consumption CFM Calculator: Enter Data in Blue Shaded Areas Engine Displacement (cubic inches) RPM at maximum horse power Cycle Factor: Enter "2" for 4 Cycle Diesel and Gasoline Enter "1" for 2 Cycle Diesel and Gasoline Volumetric Efficiency: Naturally Aspirated Gasoline & Diesel Engines Enter "0.8" Super Charged Engines Enter "1.30" Turbocharged Engines Enter "1.75"
408.8 2,800 2 1.75
Based on the information entered above, the estimated CFM of the vehicle at maximum Horse Power is:
Liters to CID Converter Liters: 6.7 Cubic Inches: 408.8 Vehicle Information Model Year 2011 Make Ford Model F250/ 350 Super-Duty Engine Specs V8 Diesel
580
CYCLE FACTOR Cycle Factor 2 1
4 Cycle Gasoline and Diesel Engine 2 Cycle Gasoline and Diesel Engine
Volumetric Efficiency (Approximate) 0.8 1.30 1.75
VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY Naturally Aspirated Gasoline & Diesel Engines Supercharged Engines Turbocharged Engines
Note: The 1.75 volumetric efficiency is applicable only at top governed engine speed under full load conditions.
EQUATION The following is a method of determining approximated gasoline and diesel engine air flow requirement: Air Flow (CFM) = Displacement (cubic inches) x 1728
RPM x Volumetric Efficiency Cycle Factor
EXAMPLE Information necessary to calculate air consumption: Ford F250 7.3L V8 Diesel Truck 4 cycle, 2800 RPM@Maximum HP, 445.4 (cubic inches) displacement, turbocharged Air Flow (CFM) :
445.4 x 1728
2800 x 1.75 = 631 CFM 2
Macintosh HD:Users:Berry:Desktop:75-5053 Zip Folder:CFM Calculator 6.7L Ford.xls
