lake & reservoir assessments catawba river basin - Amazon Web ...
LAKE & RESERVOIR ASSESSMENTS CATAWBA RIVER BASIN
Lake Norman
Intensive Survey Unit Environmental Sciences Section Division of Water Quality July 18, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2 GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 5 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 5 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF FIELD AND LABORATORY LAKES DATA ................................................. 6 WEATHER OVERVIEW FOR SUMMER 2012 ........................................................................................... 7 ASSESSMENT BY 8-DIGIT HUC HUC 03050101 Lake James ............................................................................................................................... 12 Lake Rhodhiss .......................................................................................................................... 14 Lake Hickory ............................................................................................................................. 16 Lookout Shoals Lake ................................................................................................................ 17 Lake Norman ............................................................................................................................. 19 Mountain Island Lake ................................................................................................................ 21 Lake Wylie ................................................................................................................................. 23 HUC 03050102 Newton City Lake ...................................................................................................................... 26 Bessemer City Lake .................................................................................................................. 27 APPENDIX A. Catawba River Basin Lakes Data October 1, 2008 through September 31, 2012..... A-1 Figures Figure 1. Precipitation for May 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar11 .............................................................................................................. 7 Figure 2. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, May 2012 .................................................... 7 Figure 3. Precipitation for June 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 4. Precipitation for July 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 5. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, July 2012 ................................................... 9 Figure 6. Precipitation for August 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar .................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 7. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, August 2012 ............................................ 10 Figure 8. Precipitation for September 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar ................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 9. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, September 2012 ...................................... 11 Tables Table 1. Catawba River Basin Lakes on the 2010 303(d) List of Impaired Waters................... 5 Table 2. Algal Growth Potential Test Results for Lake James, July 23, 2012 ........................ 13 Table 3. Algal Growth Potential Test Results for Lake Rhodhiss, July 2011 and July 2012 .............................................................................................................. 15 Table 4. Algal Growth Potential Test Results for Lake Wylie, July 2, 2012 ........................... 24
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 2
May 28, 2013
GLOSSARY Algae
Small aquatic plants that occur as single cells, colonies, or filaments. May also be referred to as phytoplankton, although phytoplankton are a subset of algae.
Algal biovolume
The volume of all living algae in a unit area at a given point in time. To determine biovolume, individual cells in a known amount of sample are counted. Cells are measured to obtain their cell volume, which is used in calculating biovolume
Algal density
The density of algae based on the number of units (single cells, filaments and/or colonies) present in a milliliter of water. The severity of an algae bloom may be determined by the algal density as follows: Mild bloom = 10,000 to 20,000 units/ml Mild bloom = 20,000 to 30,000 units/ml Severe bloom = 30,000 to 100,000 units/ml Extreme bloom = Greater than 100,000 units/ml
Algal Growth Potential Test (AGPT)
A test to determine the nutrient that is the most limiting to the growth of algae in a body of water. The sample water is split such that one sub-sample is given additional nitrogen, another is given phosphorus, a third may be given a combination of nitrogen and phosphorus, and one sub-sample is not treated and acts as the control. A specific species of algae is added to each sub-sample and is allowed to grow for a given period of time. The dry weights of algae in each sub-sample and the control are then measured to determine the rate of productivity in each treatment. The treatment (nitrogen or phosphorus) with the greatest algal productivity is said to be the limiting nutrient of the sample source. If the control sample has an algal dry weight greater than 5 mg/L, the source water is considered to be unlimited for either nitrogen or phosphorus.
Centric diatom
Diatoms are photosynthetic algae that have a siliceous skeleton (frustule) found in almost every aquatic environment including fresh and marine waters, as well as moist soils. Centric diatoms are circular in shape and are often found in the water column.
Chlorophyll a
Chlorophyll a is an algal pigment that is used as an approximate measure of algal biomass. The concentration of chlorophyll a is used in the calculation of the NCTSI, and the value listed is a lake-wide average from all sampling locations.
Clinograde
In productive lakes where oxygen levels drop to zero in the lower waters near the bottom, the graphed changes in oxygen from the surface to the lake bottom produces a curve known as clinograde curve.
Coccoid
Round or spherical shaped cell
Conductivity
This is a measure of the ability of water to conduct an electrical current. This measure increases as water becomes more mineralized. The concentrations listed are the range of values observed in surface readings from the sampling locations.
Dissolved oxygen
A measurement of oxygen concentrations found at the sampling locations.
Dissolved oxygen saturation
The capacity of water to absorb oxygen gas. Often expressed as a percentage, the amount of oxygen that can dissolve into water will change depending on a number of parameters, the most important being temperature. Dissolved oxygen saturation is inversely proportion to temperature, that is, as temperature increases, water’s capacity for oxygen will decrease, and vice versa.
Eutrophic
Describes a lake with high biological productivity and low water transparency.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 3
May 28, 2013
Eutrophication
The process of physical, chemical, and biological changes associated with nutrient, organic matter, and silt enrichment and sedimentation of a lake.
Limiting nutrient
The plant nutrient present in lowest concentration relative to need limits growth such that addition of the limiting nutrient will stimulate additional growth. In northern temperate lakes, phosphorus (P) is commonly the limiting nutrient for algal growth
Manganese
A naturally occurring metal commonly found in soils and organic matter. As a trace nutrient, manganese is essential to all forms of biological life. Manganese in lakes is released from bottom sediments and enters the water column when the oxygen concentration in the water near the lake bottom is extremely low or absent. Manganese in lake water may cause taste and odor problems in drinking water and require additional treatment of the raw water at water treatment facilities to alleviate this problem.
Mesotrophic
Describes a lake with moderate biological productivity and water transparency
NCTSI
North Carolina Trophic State Index was specifically developed for North Carolina lakes as part of the state’s original Clean Lakes Classification Survey (NRCD 1982). It takes the nutrients present along with chlorophyll a and Secchi depth to calculate a lake’s biological productivity.
Oligotrophic
Describes a lake with low biological productivity and high water transparency.
pH
The range of surface pH readings found at the sampling locations. This value is used to express the relative acidity or alkalinity of water.
Photic zone
The portion of the water column in which there is sufficient light for algal growth. DWQ considers 2 times the Secchi depth as depicting the photic zone.
Secchi depth
This is a measure of water transparency expressed in meters. This parameter is used in the calculation of the NCTSI value for the lake. The depth listed is an average value from all sampling locations in the lake.
Temperature
The range of surface temperatures found at the sampling locations.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
The sum of organic nitrogen and ammonia in a water body. High measurements of TKN typically results from sewage and manure discharges in water bodies.
Total organic nitrogen (TON)
Total Organic Nitrogen (TON) can represent a major reservoir of nitrogen in aquatic systems during summer months. Similar to phosphorus, this concentration can be related to lake productivity and is used in the calculation of the NCTSI. The concentration listed is a lake-wide average from all sampling stations and is calculated by subtracting Ammonia concentrations from TKN concentrations.
Total phosphorus (TP)
Total phosphorus (TP) includes all forms of phosphorus that occur in water. This nutrient is essential for the growth of aquatic plants and is often the nutrient that limits the growth of phytoplankton. It is used to calculate the NCTSI. The concentration listed is a lake-wide average from all sampling stations.
Trophic state
This is a relative description of the biological productivity of a lake based on the calculated NCTSI value. Trophic states may range from extremely productive (Hypereutrophic) to very low productivity (Oligotrophic).
Turbidity
A measure of the ability of light to pass through a volume of water. Turbidity may be influenced by suspended sediment and/or algae in the water.
Watershed
A drainage area in which all land and water areas drain or flow toward a central collector such as a stream, river, or lake at a lower elevation.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 4
May 28, 2013
Overview The Catawba River and the Broad River Basins form the headwaters of the Santee-Cooper River system, which flows through South Carolina to the Atlantic Ocean. The basin is the eighth largest river basin in the state covering 3,279 square miles in the south central portion of western North Carolina. The Catawba River has its source on the eastern slopes of the Blue Ridge Mountains in McDowell County, and flows eastward, then southward, to the state line near Charlotte. The headwaters of the river are formed by swift flowing, cold water streams originating in the steep terrain of the mountains. Although the topography of the upper basin is characterized by mountains, smaller hills give way to a rolling terrain near the state line. As the basin enters the Inner Piedmont, land use shifts from forest to agricultural and urban uses. Though urban areas are not numerous in the upper basin, the lower portion of the basin contains many cities, including the Charlotte metropolitan area. Nine lakes were sampled in this river basin by DWQ staff in 2012. Two lakes appear on the 2012 303(d) List of Impaired Waters (Table 1). Mountain Island Lake had been previously placed on the 2010 303(d) List for low pH values observed in 2008. Water quality sampling of this lake in 2010 ( Appendix A) confirmed the presence of pH values within the state’s water quality limits and the lake was removed from the 303(d) List in 2012 (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu/assessment).
Table 1. Catawba River Basin Lakes on the 2012 303(d) List of Impaired Waters.
Lake
Location
Violation
303(d) Year
Lake Rhodhiss below elevation 995'
From Johns River to Rhodhiss Dam
Elevated pH
2006
Lake Wylie South Fork Catawba River Arm - NC portion
South Fork Catawba River Arm of Lake Wylie
Elevated copper Elevated surface water temperatures
2008
Following the description of the assessment methodology used for the Catawba River Basin, there are individual summaries for each of the lakes and a two-paged matrix that distills the information used to make the lakes use support assessments.
Assessment Methodology For this report, data from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2012 were reviewed. Lake monitoring and sample collection activities performed by DWQ field staff are in accordance with the Intensive Survey Unit Standard Operating Procedures Manual (http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=522a90a4-b593-426f-8c1121a35569dfd8&groupId=38364) An interactive map of the state showing the locations of lake sites sampled by DWQ may be found at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ambient-lakes-map. All lakes were sampled during the growing season from May through September. Data were assessed for excursions of the state's Class C water quality standards for chlorophyll a, pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature, turbidity, and surface metals. Other parameters discussed in this report include Secchi depth and percent dissolved oxygen saturation. Secchi depth provides a measure of water clarity and is used in calculating the trophic or nutrient enriched status of a lake. Percent dissolved oxygen saturation gives information on the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water column and may be increased by photosynthesis or depressed by oxygen-consuming decomposition.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 5
May 28, 2013
For algae collection and assessment, water samples are collected from the photic zone, preserved in the field and taken concurrently with chemical and physical parameters. Samples were quantitatively analyzed to determine assemblage structure, density (units/ml) and biovolume (m3/mm3). For the purpose of reporting, algal blooms were determined by the measurement of unit density (units/ml). Unit density is a quantitative measurement of the number of filaments, colonies or single celled taxa in a waterbody. Blooms are considered mild if they are between 10,000 and 20,000 units/ml. Moderate blooms are those between 20,000 and 30,000 units/ml. Severe blooms are between 30,000 and 100,000 units/ml. Extreme blooms are those 100,000 units/ml or greater. An algal group is considered dominant when it comprises 40% or more of the total unit density or total biovolume. A genus is considered dominant when it comprises 30% or more of the total unit density or total biovolume. Additional data considered as part of the use support assessment include historic DWQ water quality data, documented algal blooms and/or fish kills, problematic aquatic macrophytes, or listing on the EPA's 303(d) List of Impaired Waters. For a more complete discussion of lake ecology and assessment, please go to http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/isu. The 1992 North Carolina Lake Assessment Report (downloadable from this website) contains a detailed chapter on ecological concepts that clarifies how the parameters discussed in this review relate to water quality and reservoir health.
Quality Assurance of Field and Laboratory Lakes Data Data collected in the field via single or multiparameter water quality meters are entered into the Ambient Lakes Database within 24 hours of the sampling date. These data are then reviewed for accuracy and completeness within a week of entry. Data that have not been reviewed are given a ‘P’ code for ‘Provisional‘ (data has been entered but not been verified for accuracy and/or completeness). Data that have been verified are given an ‘A’ code for ‘Accepted’. Chemistry data from the DWQ Water Quality Laboratory are entered into the Lakes Database within 48 hours of receipt from the lab. As with the field data, laboratory results are coded ‘P’ until the entered data is verified for entry accuracy and completeness, after which, the code is changed to ‘A’. Generally, laboratory data entered into the Lakes Database are verified within a week following the initial entry. Data, either laboratory or field, which appear to be out of range for the lake sampled are double checked against field sheets or the laboratory results form by the Lakes Data Administrator for possible data entry error. If there are data entry mistakes, possible equipment, sampling, and/or analysis errors, these are investigated and corrected if possible. If the possible source of an error cannot be determined, the data remains in the database. If an error is determined, the data value is removed from the appropriate database parameter field and placed in the ‘Notes’ field along with a comment regarding the error. Chemistry results received from the laboratory that have been given an qualification code are also entered into the ‘Notes’ field along with the assigned laboratory code. Laboratory qualification coded data or data which may be in error due to sampling, handling, and/or equipment problems are only entered into the ‘Notes’ field and never in the data field(s) in the Ambient Lakes Database. Additional information regarding the Quality Assurance Program is covered in the Ambient Lake Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Plan. Version 1.1 (July 2012) of this document is available on the ISU website (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/isu).
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 6
May 28, 2013
Weather Overview for Summer 2012 th
After a dry, warm winter, May brought beneficial rainfall to the state and ranked as the 10 wettest May on record since 1895 based on statewide average rainfall. The coastal plains and the northwestern region of the state received the most rainfall during this month (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Precipitation for May 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
The wet conditions in May helped to alleviate most of the short-term concerns with hydrological drought in the state (Figure 2). Much of the Catawba River Basin started out the month in moderate drought conditions and improved to abnormally dry conditions. Temperatures in May were warm, averaging 3.5 °F above the normal for the month.
Figure 2. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina , May 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 7
May 28, 2013
June temperatures in North Carolina were much cooler than normal, despite a heat wave that began on the th last few days of the month. Overall, June 2012 ranked as the 29 coolest June since1895. The last half of June was also drier with most of the state receiving 75% less than the normal rainfall for the month (Figure 3). Much of the Catawba River Basin received 25% to 75% of the estimated rainfall for the month.
Figure 3. Precipitation for June 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
July 2012 remained warm and, overall, the temperatures for the month ranked as the 3rd warmest for the state since 1895. Rainfall was closer to normal for a typical July in the state (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Precipitation for July 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
Although the southwestern region of the Catawba River Basin was in a moderate drought at the beginning of the month, the rainfall amounts improved conditions to abnormally dry in the southern part of the river basin by the end of the month (Figure 5).
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 8
May 28, 2013
Figure 5. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina , July 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
Temperatures in August 2012 averaged near normal in the state. Early August started out warmer while late August was cooler. Rainfall totals for the month were also closer to normal for the month, with wetter conditions occurring in the east and drier conditions present in the west. In August, some parts of the state experienced a few days of very heavy rainfall which resulted in localized flooding (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Precipitation for August 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
Drought conditions throughout the state were greatly diminished in August 2012 as compared to previous years. By the end of the month, only a few regions of abnormally dry conditions existed in the state, including the central region of the Catawba River Basin (Figure 7).
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 9
May 28, 2013
Figure 7. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina , August 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
September storms brought substantial rainfall to central and western NC, while the coastal plain and southwestern corner of the state remained dry (Figure 8). Most of the Catawba River Basin received estimated rainfall amounts between 105% and 150% of normal for the month. The rainfall amounts helped to maintain stream and reservoir to at or near normal levels throughout most of the state. Temperatures were cooler than normal for the central piedmont and coastal plain and within the normal ranges for the mountains.
Figure 8. Precipitation for September 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
Drought conditions in the state continued to decline in September with abnormally dry conditions persisting in three isolated regions of the state (Figure 9). Abnormally dry conditions improved in the Catawba River Basin by the end of September.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 10
May 28, 2013
Figure 9. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, September 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 11
May 28, 2013
LAKE & RESERVOIR ASSESSMENTS HUC 03050101
Lake James
Ambient Lakes Program Name
Lake James
Trophic Status (NC TSI) Oligotrophic M ean Depth (meters) 14.0 36.9 Volume (10 6 m 3 ) 380 Watershed Area (mi 2 ) Classification WS-IV B C CTB013B CTB013C CTB015A CTB015C CTB023A1 Stations Number of Times Sampled 5 5 5 5 5
CTB023B
5
Lake James is formed by the impoundment of the Catawba and Linville Rivers and is the most upstream reservoir of the Catawba Chain Lakes. The Catawba and Linville River portions of Lake James are joined by a small canal. Water flows from the Catawba River portion of Lake James through this canal into the Linville River side. Due to the shallowness of the canal as compared with the reservoir on either side, warm, oxygenated surface water from the Catawba River portions flows into the Linville River section during the summer months, and the colder, less oxygenated water is trapped within the Catawba River side of Lake James. Hypolimnetic water (the deeper, colder bottom water) from Lake James exits the reservoir from the Linville River portion. This leaves the warmer, more oxygenated water flowing in from the Catawba River. The result of these hydrologic dynamics produces distinct differences in the temperature profiles in each side of the reservoir. DWQ staff monitored Lake James from May through September 2012. Secchi depths ranged from 0.8 meter at the upper end of the Catawba River arm of the reservoir (CTB013B) in May 2012 to 4.6 meters at the lower end of the Linville River arm (CTB023B) in June 2012 (Appendix A). Surface dissolved oxygen ranged from 6.8 to 9.1 mg/L and surface pH values ranged from 7.2 to 8.2 s.u. Surface conductivity values in 2012 were similar to those previously observed at this lake by DWQ staff.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 12
May 28, 2013
Total phosphorus concentrations were generally below DWQ laboratory detection levels with the exception of values recorded for CTB013B in the upper end of the Catawba River arm. These values ranged from 0.04 mg/L in May to 0.02 mg/L in June, August and September. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen concentrations ranged from
Lake Norman
Intensive Survey Unit Environmental Sciences Section Division of Water Quality July 18, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2 GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 5 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 5 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF FIELD AND LABORATORY LAKES DATA ................................................. 6 WEATHER OVERVIEW FOR SUMMER 2012 ........................................................................................... 7 ASSESSMENT BY 8-DIGIT HUC HUC 03050101 Lake James ............................................................................................................................... 12 Lake Rhodhiss .......................................................................................................................... 14 Lake Hickory ............................................................................................................................. 16 Lookout Shoals Lake ................................................................................................................ 17 Lake Norman ............................................................................................................................. 19 Mountain Island Lake ................................................................................................................ 21 Lake Wylie ................................................................................................................................. 23 HUC 03050102 Newton City Lake ...................................................................................................................... 26 Bessemer City Lake .................................................................................................................. 27 APPENDIX A. Catawba River Basin Lakes Data October 1, 2008 through September 31, 2012..... A-1 Figures Figure 1. Precipitation for May 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar11 .............................................................................................................. 7 Figure 2. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, May 2012 .................................................... 7 Figure 3. Precipitation for June 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 4. Precipitation for July 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 5. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, July 2012 ................................................... 9 Figure 6. Precipitation for August 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar .................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 7. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, August 2012 ............................................ 10 Figure 8. Precipitation for September 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar ................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 9. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, September 2012 ...................................... 11 Tables Table 1. Catawba River Basin Lakes on the 2010 303(d) List of Impaired Waters................... 5 Table 2. Algal Growth Potential Test Results for Lake James, July 23, 2012 ........................ 13 Table 3. Algal Growth Potential Test Results for Lake Rhodhiss, July 2011 and July 2012 .............................................................................................................. 15 Table 4. Algal Growth Potential Test Results for Lake Wylie, July 2, 2012 ........................... 24
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 2
May 28, 2013
GLOSSARY Algae
Small aquatic plants that occur as single cells, colonies, or filaments. May also be referred to as phytoplankton, although phytoplankton are a subset of algae.
Algal biovolume
The volume of all living algae in a unit area at a given point in time. To determine biovolume, individual cells in a known amount of sample are counted. Cells are measured to obtain their cell volume, which is used in calculating biovolume
Algal density
The density of algae based on the number of units (single cells, filaments and/or colonies) present in a milliliter of water. The severity of an algae bloom may be determined by the algal density as follows: Mild bloom = 10,000 to 20,000 units/ml Mild bloom = 20,000 to 30,000 units/ml Severe bloom = 30,000 to 100,000 units/ml Extreme bloom = Greater than 100,000 units/ml
Algal Growth Potential Test (AGPT)
A test to determine the nutrient that is the most limiting to the growth of algae in a body of water. The sample water is split such that one sub-sample is given additional nitrogen, another is given phosphorus, a third may be given a combination of nitrogen and phosphorus, and one sub-sample is not treated and acts as the control. A specific species of algae is added to each sub-sample and is allowed to grow for a given period of time. The dry weights of algae in each sub-sample and the control are then measured to determine the rate of productivity in each treatment. The treatment (nitrogen or phosphorus) with the greatest algal productivity is said to be the limiting nutrient of the sample source. If the control sample has an algal dry weight greater than 5 mg/L, the source water is considered to be unlimited for either nitrogen or phosphorus.
Centric diatom
Diatoms are photosynthetic algae that have a siliceous skeleton (frustule) found in almost every aquatic environment including fresh and marine waters, as well as moist soils. Centric diatoms are circular in shape and are often found in the water column.
Chlorophyll a
Chlorophyll a is an algal pigment that is used as an approximate measure of algal biomass. The concentration of chlorophyll a is used in the calculation of the NCTSI, and the value listed is a lake-wide average from all sampling locations.
Clinograde
In productive lakes where oxygen levels drop to zero in the lower waters near the bottom, the graphed changes in oxygen from the surface to the lake bottom produces a curve known as clinograde curve.
Coccoid
Round or spherical shaped cell
Conductivity
This is a measure of the ability of water to conduct an electrical current. This measure increases as water becomes more mineralized. The concentrations listed are the range of values observed in surface readings from the sampling locations.
Dissolved oxygen
A measurement of oxygen concentrations found at the sampling locations.
Dissolved oxygen saturation
The capacity of water to absorb oxygen gas. Often expressed as a percentage, the amount of oxygen that can dissolve into water will change depending on a number of parameters, the most important being temperature. Dissolved oxygen saturation is inversely proportion to temperature, that is, as temperature increases, water’s capacity for oxygen will decrease, and vice versa.
Eutrophic
Describes a lake with high biological productivity and low water transparency.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 3
May 28, 2013
Eutrophication
The process of physical, chemical, and biological changes associated with nutrient, organic matter, and silt enrichment and sedimentation of a lake.
Limiting nutrient
The plant nutrient present in lowest concentration relative to need limits growth such that addition of the limiting nutrient will stimulate additional growth. In northern temperate lakes, phosphorus (P) is commonly the limiting nutrient for algal growth
Manganese
A naturally occurring metal commonly found in soils and organic matter. As a trace nutrient, manganese is essential to all forms of biological life. Manganese in lakes is released from bottom sediments and enters the water column when the oxygen concentration in the water near the lake bottom is extremely low or absent. Manganese in lake water may cause taste and odor problems in drinking water and require additional treatment of the raw water at water treatment facilities to alleviate this problem.
Mesotrophic
Describes a lake with moderate biological productivity and water transparency
NCTSI
North Carolina Trophic State Index was specifically developed for North Carolina lakes as part of the state’s original Clean Lakes Classification Survey (NRCD 1982). It takes the nutrients present along with chlorophyll a and Secchi depth to calculate a lake’s biological productivity.
Oligotrophic
Describes a lake with low biological productivity and high water transparency.
pH
The range of surface pH readings found at the sampling locations. This value is used to express the relative acidity or alkalinity of water.
Photic zone
The portion of the water column in which there is sufficient light for algal growth. DWQ considers 2 times the Secchi depth as depicting the photic zone.
Secchi depth
This is a measure of water transparency expressed in meters. This parameter is used in the calculation of the NCTSI value for the lake. The depth listed is an average value from all sampling locations in the lake.
Temperature
The range of surface temperatures found at the sampling locations.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
The sum of organic nitrogen and ammonia in a water body. High measurements of TKN typically results from sewage and manure discharges in water bodies.
Total organic nitrogen (TON)
Total Organic Nitrogen (TON) can represent a major reservoir of nitrogen in aquatic systems during summer months. Similar to phosphorus, this concentration can be related to lake productivity and is used in the calculation of the NCTSI. The concentration listed is a lake-wide average from all sampling stations and is calculated by subtracting Ammonia concentrations from TKN concentrations.
Total phosphorus (TP)
Total phosphorus (TP) includes all forms of phosphorus that occur in water. This nutrient is essential for the growth of aquatic plants and is often the nutrient that limits the growth of phytoplankton. It is used to calculate the NCTSI. The concentration listed is a lake-wide average from all sampling stations.
Trophic state
This is a relative description of the biological productivity of a lake based on the calculated NCTSI value. Trophic states may range from extremely productive (Hypereutrophic) to very low productivity (Oligotrophic).
Turbidity
A measure of the ability of light to pass through a volume of water. Turbidity may be influenced by suspended sediment and/or algae in the water.
Watershed
A drainage area in which all land and water areas drain or flow toward a central collector such as a stream, river, or lake at a lower elevation.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 4
May 28, 2013
Overview The Catawba River and the Broad River Basins form the headwaters of the Santee-Cooper River system, which flows through South Carolina to the Atlantic Ocean. The basin is the eighth largest river basin in the state covering 3,279 square miles in the south central portion of western North Carolina. The Catawba River has its source on the eastern slopes of the Blue Ridge Mountains in McDowell County, and flows eastward, then southward, to the state line near Charlotte. The headwaters of the river are formed by swift flowing, cold water streams originating in the steep terrain of the mountains. Although the topography of the upper basin is characterized by mountains, smaller hills give way to a rolling terrain near the state line. As the basin enters the Inner Piedmont, land use shifts from forest to agricultural and urban uses. Though urban areas are not numerous in the upper basin, the lower portion of the basin contains many cities, including the Charlotte metropolitan area. Nine lakes were sampled in this river basin by DWQ staff in 2012. Two lakes appear on the 2012 303(d) List of Impaired Waters (Table 1). Mountain Island Lake had been previously placed on the 2010 303(d) List for low pH values observed in 2008. Water quality sampling of this lake in 2010 ( Appendix A) confirmed the presence of pH values within the state’s water quality limits and the lake was removed from the 303(d) List in 2012 (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu/assessment).
Table 1. Catawba River Basin Lakes on the 2012 303(d) List of Impaired Waters.
Lake
Location
Violation
303(d) Year
Lake Rhodhiss below elevation 995'
From Johns River to Rhodhiss Dam
Elevated pH
2006
Lake Wylie South Fork Catawba River Arm - NC portion
South Fork Catawba River Arm of Lake Wylie
Elevated copper Elevated surface water temperatures
2008
Following the description of the assessment methodology used for the Catawba River Basin, there are individual summaries for each of the lakes and a two-paged matrix that distills the information used to make the lakes use support assessments.
Assessment Methodology For this report, data from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2012 were reviewed. Lake monitoring and sample collection activities performed by DWQ field staff are in accordance with the Intensive Survey Unit Standard Operating Procedures Manual (http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=522a90a4-b593-426f-8c1121a35569dfd8&groupId=38364) An interactive map of the state showing the locations of lake sites sampled by DWQ may be found at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ambient-lakes-map. All lakes were sampled during the growing season from May through September. Data were assessed for excursions of the state's Class C water quality standards for chlorophyll a, pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature, turbidity, and surface metals. Other parameters discussed in this report include Secchi depth and percent dissolved oxygen saturation. Secchi depth provides a measure of water clarity and is used in calculating the trophic or nutrient enriched status of a lake. Percent dissolved oxygen saturation gives information on the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water column and may be increased by photosynthesis or depressed by oxygen-consuming decomposition.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 5
May 28, 2013
For algae collection and assessment, water samples are collected from the photic zone, preserved in the field and taken concurrently with chemical and physical parameters. Samples were quantitatively analyzed to determine assemblage structure, density (units/ml) and biovolume (m3/mm3). For the purpose of reporting, algal blooms were determined by the measurement of unit density (units/ml). Unit density is a quantitative measurement of the number of filaments, colonies or single celled taxa in a waterbody. Blooms are considered mild if they are between 10,000 and 20,000 units/ml. Moderate blooms are those between 20,000 and 30,000 units/ml. Severe blooms are between 30,000 and 100,000 units/ml. Extreme blooms are those 100,000 units/ml or greater. An algal group is considered dominant when it comprises 40% or more of the total unit density or total biovolume. A genus is considered dominant when it comprises 30% or more of the total unit density or total biovolume. Additional data considered as part of the use support assessment include historic DWQ water quality data, documented algal blooms and/or fish kills, problematic aquatic macrophytes, or listing on the EPA's 303(d) List of Impaired Waters. For a more complete discussion of lake ecology and assessment, please go to http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/isu. The 1992 North Carolina Lake Assessment Report (downloadable from this website) contains a detailed chapter on ecological concepts that clarifies how the parameters discussed in this review relate to water quality and reservoir health.
Quality Assurance of Field and Laboratory Lakes Data Data collected in the field via single or multiparameter water quality meters are entered into the Ambient Lakes Database within 24 hours of the sampling date. These data are then reviewed for accuracy and completeness within a week of entry. Data that have not been reviewed are given a ‘P’ code for ‘Provisional‘ (data has been entered but not been verified for accuracy and/or completeness). Data that have been verified are given an ‘A’ code for ‘Accepted’. Chemistry data from the DWQ Water Quality Laboratory are entered into the Lakes Database within 48 hours of receipt from the lab. As with the field data, laboratory results are coded ‘P’ until the entered data is verified for entry accuracy and completeness, after which, the code is changed to ‘A’. Generally, laboratory data entered into the Lakes Database are verified within a week following the initial entry. Data, either laboratory or field, which appear to be out of range for the lake sampled are double checked against field sheets or the laboratory results form by the Lakes Data Administrator for possible data entry error. If there are data entry mistakes, possible equipment, sampling, and/or analysis errors, these are investigated and corrected if possible. If the possible source of an error cannot be determined, the data remains in the database. If an error is determined, the data value is removed from the appropriate database parameter field and placed in the ‘Notes’ field along with a comment regarding the error. Chemistry results received from the laboratory that have been given an qualification code are also entered into the ‘Notes’ field along with the assigned laboratory code. Laboratory qualification coded data or data which may be in error due to sampling, handling, and/or equipment problems are only entered into the ‘Notes’ field and never in the data field(s) in the Ambient Lakes Database. Additional information regarding the Quality Assurance Program is covered in the Ambient Lake Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Plan. Version 1.1 (July 2012) of this document is available on the ISU website (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/isu).
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 6
May 28, 2013
Weather Overview for Summer 2012 th
After a dry, warm winter, May brought beneficial rainfall to the state and ranked as the 10 wettest May on record since 1895 based on statewide average rainfall. The coastal plains and the northwestern region of the state received the most rainfall during this month (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Precipitation for May 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
The wet conditions in May helped to alleviate most of the short-term concerns with hydrological drought in the state (Figure 2). Much of the Catawba River Basin started out the month in moderate drought conditions and improved to abnormally dry conditions. Temperatures in May were warm, averaging 3.5 °F above the normal for the month.
Figure 2. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina , May 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 7
May 28, 2013
June temperatures in North Carolina were much cooler than normal, despite a heat wave that began on the th last few days of the month. Overall, June 2012 ranked as the 29 coolest June since1895. The last half of June was also drier with most of the state receiving 75% less than the normal rainfall for the month (Figure 3). Much of the Catawba River Basin received 25% to 75% of the estimated rainfall for the month.
Figure 3. Precipitation for June 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
July 2012 remained warm and, overall, the temperatures for the month ranked as the 3rd warmest for the state since 1895. Rainfall was closer to normal for a typical July in the state (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Precipitation for July 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
Although the southwestern region of the Catawba River Basin was in a moderate drought at the beginning of the month, the rainfall amounts improved conditions to abnormally dry in the southern part of the river basin by the end of the month (Figure 5).
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 8
May 28, 2013
Figure 5. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina , July 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
Temperatures in August 2012 averaged near normal in the state. Early August started out warmer while late August was cooler. Rainfall totals for the month were also closer to normal for the month, with wetter conditions occurring in the east and drier conditions present in the west. In August, some parts of the state experienced a few days of very heavy rainfall which resulted in localized flooding (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Precipitation for August 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
Drought conditions throughout the state were greatly diminished in August 2012 as compared to previous years. By the end of the month, only a few regions of abnormally dry conditions existed in the state, including the central region of the Catawba River Basin (Figure 7).
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 9
May 28, 2013
Figure 7. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina , August 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
September storms brought substantial rainfall to central and western NC, while the coastal plain and southwestern corner of the state remained dry (Figure 8). Most of the Catawba River Basin received estimated rainfall amounts between 105% and 150% of normal for the month. The rainfall amounts helped to maintain stream and reservoir to at or near normal levels throughout most of the state. Temperatures were cooler than normal for the central piedmont and coastal plain and within the normal ranges for the mountains.
Figure 8. Precipitation for September 2012: Percent of Normal Based on Estimates From NWS Radar (Data courtesy NWS/NCEP)
Drought conditions in the state continued to decline in September with abnormally dry conditions persisting in three isolated regions of the state (Figure 9). Abnormally dry conditions improved in the Catawba River Basin by the end of September.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 10
May 28, 2013
Figure 9. US Drought Monitor for North Carolina, September 2012 (Courtesy of NC DENR Division of Water Resources)
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 11
May 28, 2013
LAKE & RESERVOIR ASSESSMENTS HUC 03050101
Lake James
Ambient Lakes Program Name
Lake James
Trophic Status (NC TSI) Oligotrophic M ean Depth (meters) 14.0 36.9 Volume (10 6 m 3 ) 380 Watershed Area (mi 2 ) Classification WS-IV B C CTB013B CTB013C CTB015A CTB015C CTB023A1 Stations Number of Times Sampled 5 5 5 5 5
CTB023B
5
Lake James is formed by the impoundment of the Catawba and Linville Rivers and is the most upstream reservoir of the Catawba Chain Lakes. The Catawba and Linville River portions of Lake James are joined by a small canal. Water flows from the Catawba River portion of Lake James through this canal into the Linville River side. Due to the shallowness of the canal as compared with the reservoir on either side, warm, oxygenated surface water from the Catawba River portions flows into the Linville River section during the summer months, and the colder, less oxygenated water is trapped within the Catawba River side of Lake James. Hypolimnetic water (the deeper, colder bottom water) from Lake James exits the reservoir from the Linville River portion. This leaves the warmer, more oxygenated water flowing in from the Catawba River. The result of these hydrologic dynamics produces distinct differences in the temperature profiles in each side of the reservoir. DWQ staff monitored Lake James from May through September 2012. Secchi depths ranged from 0.8 meter at the upper end of the Catawba River arm of the reservoir (CTB013B) in May 2012 to 4.6 meters at the lower end of the Linville River arm (CTB023B) in June 2012 (Appendix A). Surface dissolved oxygen ranged from 6.8 to 9.1 mg/L and surface pH values ranged from 7.2 to 8.2 s.u. Surface conductivity values in 2012 were similar to those previously observed at this lake by DWQ staff.
Intensive Survey Unit
Page 12
May 28, 2013
Total phosphorus concentrations were generally below DWQ laboratory detection levels with the exception of values recorded for CTB013B in the upper end of the Catawba River arm. These values ranged from 0.04 mg/L in May to 0.02 mg/L in June, August and September. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen concentrations ranged from
