LECTURE NOTES Topic 1: An introduction to Australian constitutionalism Government ‘rules’ (i.e. 76 seats in HoR to form government) Not in constitution English convention Unwritten rule Therefore no legal remedy available as non judiciable What is a constitution? United the colonies- main purpose Divides the powers Created Australia- a new nation Usually establishes nation or government Three arms of government- executive, judicial, legislative Contains fundamental rules that define state and institutions Is the Australian constitution a law? If so, is it the same as every other law? Why (not)? It is a law Entrenched or higher law- harder to change i.e. referendum or interpretation via high court S109- federal law overrides inconsistency with state law Do all countries have/need a written/entrenched constitution like Australia? No- UK and NZ America has one Why does Australia have one but NZ & UK don’t? What about the constitutions of the Australian states? NZ and UK do not have written constitution From what circumstances was the Australian constitution born? Do they differ from the birth of the American constitution? Constitutional consequences? Wanted a Federation, therefore needed the rules written down Influences by American constitution What elements of Australian society were not involved in the drafting of the Australian constitution? Women Aboriginals Authority therefore may be on questionable grounds- ‘we weren’t involved therefore we are not subject to your rules’ What is parliamentary sovereignty? Popular sovereignty? What parliament enacted the commonwealth of Australia constitution act? State and commonwealth parliament have limited powers If truly sovereign, laws cant be challenged in court Political remedy- vote them out Not sovereign Means that parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament Brief constitutional chronology 1215: significance of magna carta
Limited arbitrary exercise of royal power and come to represent birth of what we call rule of law Provided that no person could be arbitrarily arrested or imprisoned by Monarch 1295: birth of bicameral parliament Two houses Significance for judiciary of case of prohibitions (1607) and case of proclamations (1611) Prohibitions: king or queen can’t be personally involved in criminal casesdetermined by law, separation of powers Proclamations: monarch can’t create new crime by proclamation- courts only (not the case anymore) Impact the English civil war had on Australian constitutionalism Parliament v the crown Parliament won Parliament won, therefore became supreme legal characteristic Therefore statute trumps common law Glorious Revolution: Bill of Rights 1688 o Conferred title of kings and queen- hold that title at will of parliament o Taxes can only be levied by parliament o Parliamentary privilegestatements made in parliament cannot be challenged o Parliamentary law cannot be suspended by monarch Act of settlement 1701 o Determines who is lawfully entitled to be king or queen of England- can’t be catholic, males preferred (changed recently) Sources of Australian constitutional law 1855: Victorian constitution 1865: Colonial Laws Validity Act and the bizarre south Australian judge Benjamin Boothby Started invalidating colonial south Australian statues because they clashed with English common law Forgetting that legislation trumps common law Act enacted- made clear that colonial parliaments can pass any act they want subject to statutes that sought to regulate same behaviour as English laws 1890’s: what forces drove the movement towards federation? Defence and protection from English defence force Trade s 92