Lenawee Cradle to Career Data Committee Meeting
Lenawee Cradle to Career Data Committee Meeting September 14, 2016
Ground Rules • •
Decision Making toward consensus building Deliverables o Collect and disaggregate baseline data by key subpopulations for the core indicators o Prioritize a subset of core indicators
• •
Meetings held face to face and share electronic correspondence Stan serves as Point person for committee
From Individual Action to Collective Impact Collective Impact • A group working towards the same outcome, • Looking at student level data, • To continuously improve practices over time
Coordinated Impact • A group working on the same issue, • Sharing program level data • To identify best practices and align efforts
Individual Impact • Individual practioners working on specific issues
• Collecting qualitative and quantitative data • To demonstrate impact with individual students
Meeting Agenda 1:00 – 1:30 p.m.
Spring 2016 Statewide Assessment Results
1:30 – 2:15 p.m.
Success Network Updates
2:15 - 2:30 p.m.
LC2C Strategic Planning Update
2:30 – 3:00 p.m.
StriveTogether Data Playbook
Lenawee County Spring 2016 M-STEP Results Stan Masters Coordinator of Instructional Data Services September 1, 2016
• M-STEP
Sources of Data
– Public statewide results were released by MDE on August 30. – Public district results were released to www.MISchoolData.org on August 30. – Data represents the students in Lenawee County Public Schools, including students in LISD programs.
• Locations for Disaggregated, Student Level, and Test-Level Data – Disaggregated data from the Spring test is found at www.MISchoolData.org – Student Level data is found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected) – Test-Level strand/content expectation data for Science and Social Studies are found on the BAA Secure Site (password protected) – Test-Level claim/target data ELA and Math will be released later this fall on the BAA Secure Site (password protected) – Parent Reports have been sent to schools to distribute to students whom schools tested last year.
English Language Arts English Language Arts
English Language Arts English Language Arts English Language Arts Mathematics
Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics
Mathematics Science Science Science
Social Studies Social Studies Social Studies
0% English Language Arts
Lenawee County Spring 2016 M-STEP Percent Proficient, by grade and content area
100% Lenawee County
90% Statewide
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
3 4 5 6 7 8 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 7 11 5 8 11
Spring 2016 M-STEP ELA Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Lenawee County Statewide
English Language Arts 3 48.8% 46.0%
English Language Arts 4 46.2% 46.3%
English Language Arts 5 50.0% 50.6%
English Language Arts 6 43.4% 45.0%
English Language Arts 7 45.1% 47.1%
English Language Arts 8 47.9% 48.9%
Spring 2016 M-STEP Math Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80%
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0%
Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lenawee County 48.5% 39.9% 28.0% 29.1% 33.4% 34.6% Statewide 45.2% 44.0% 33.8% 32.8% 35.3% 32.7%
Spring 2016 M-STEP Science Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80%
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0% Lenawee County Statewide
Science 4 13.5% 14.7%
Science 7 20.6% 23.9%
Science 11 31.6% 33.0%
Spring 2016 M-STEP Social Studies Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80%
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0% Lenawee County Statewide
Social Studies 5 19.2% 18.9%
Social Studies 8 33.9% 29.3%
Social Studies 11 39.9% 43.1%
M-STEP English Language Arts Change in Performance Level Spring 2015 to Spring 2016 Spring Spring Not Partially 2015 2016 Proficient Proficient Proficient Advanced Not Proficient 67% 29% 5% 0% Partially Proficient 23% 47% 28% 1% Proficient 4% 24% 57% 16% Advanced 0% 4% 29% 66%
M-STEP Mathematics Change in Performance Level Spring 2015 to Spring 2016 Spring Spring Not Partially 2015 2016 Proficient Proficient Proficient Advanced Not Proficient 75% 23% 2% 0% Partially Proficient 29% 53% 17% 1% Proficient 4% 36% 46% 14% Advanced 0% 6% 32% 62%
Lenawee County Spring 2016 SAT Results Stan Masters Coordinator of Instructional Data Services September 1, 2016
Sources of Data • College Readiness Scores – Public statewide results were released by MDE on August 30. – Public district results were released to www.MISchoolData.org on August 30. – Data represents the students in Lenawee County Public Schools, including students in LISD programs – Reports are found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected)
• District writing scores – Public statewide results were released by MDE on August 30. – Public district results, which do not count toward ACT’s College Readiness Benchmark, are available on www.MISchoolData.org – The College Board provides a data portal for schools (password protected) to analyze their data. – Data reports are found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected)
100%
Spring 2016 SAT Percent of Grade 11 Students Who Met of Exceeded the College Readiness Benchmark, by County and State
90%
Lenawee County Statewide
80% 70%
62.4% 60%
60.2%
50% 40%
37.0%
36.9%
35.5%
34.9%
30%
20% 10% 0% Evidence Based Reading and Writing
Mathematics
Both Content Areas
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Scores
Stan Masters LISD Coordinator of Instructional Data Services September 1, 2016
Context of this report • • • • • •
Data from Spring 2016 Work Keys Assessment Day 2 of Michigan Merit Exam All Juniors in public school district take these assessment N=1033 Public data on these results are not found on MISchoolData. Student Level data is found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected) • Descriptions of student performance levels are found at http://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/workforcesolutions/act-workkeys/about-act-workkeys.html
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Applied Mathematics Score Level Distribution, by Number of Students 350 308 290
300
250 211 200
150
119 100
63 50
42
0 0
3
4
5
6
7
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Locating Information Score Level Distribution, by Number of Students 700 603
600
500
400
300 240 200 141 100 48
1
0 0
3
4
5
6
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Reading for Information Score Level Distribution, by Number of Students 500
466
450
400 350 300 261
250 212
200 150 100
50
21
34
34
0 0
3
4
5
6
7
Statistics WorkKeys Assessment
Applied Mathematics (7)
Locating Information (6)
Reading for Information (7)
4.8
3.9
4.9
5
4
5
6
4
5
Mean
Median
Mode
Overview of WorkKeys Assessments http://www.act.org/certificate/index.html
• Level scores related to National Career Readiness Certificate – Bronze • scores at least a level 3 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 16 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
– Silver • scores at least a level 4 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 67 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
– Gold • scores at least a level 5 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 93 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
– Platinum • scores at least a level 6 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 99 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
National Career Readiness Certificate NCRC Indicator
Number of Students
Low
80
Bronze
186
Silver
551
Gold
215
Platinum
1
Lenawee County Community Outcome Current State, 09/13/16
Spring 2016 Kindergarten Readiness Spring 2016 M-STEP 3rd Grade ELA Proficiency Spring 2016 M-STEP 8th Grade Math Proficiency Spring 2016 M-STEP 7th Grade Science Proficiency Class of 2015 High School 4Year Graduation Rate Class of 2014 Post Secondary Enrollment within first 12 months Class of 2009 Post Secondary Completion within 6 years
All Students
Students of Non-White Ethnicity
Students with Disabilities
Students Economically Disadvantaged
48.8%
Hispanic 42.4% African American 29.2%
21.0%
40.2%
34.6%
Hispanic 24.7% African American 41.9%
4.0%
22.6%
20.6%
Hispanic 12.8% African American 7.7%
5.4%
12.0%
86.2%
Hispanic 86% African American 84%
60.3%
77.7%
69.0%
Hispanic 53.2% African American 55%
31.6%
Hispanic 18.9% African American 12%
50%
Updates on Student Success Networks
Success Network Updates • Post Secondary Enrollment and Completion – County counselors reviewing SAT scores at their Sept. mtg. – September 18-21–National College Access Network Conference Lenawee and State will be well represented – October 1 – FAFSA opens, using prior-year data – October 5 – LCAN Welcome Meeting @Tecumseh Community Room at the TPS Administration Building, 8:00 – 9:30 a.m. – October 20 – Principals/Counselors Conference – October 24-28 - College Awareness Week – Jackson College mentoring program will be supported by FirstYear Experience course – Tracking our certifications that students earn in this county is important for the 2016-2017 school year – Class of 2016 Post-Secondary Indicators nearly completed by all schools – Working with Career Cruising/MIBrightFuture to add more student features, with support from Region 9
Success Network Updates • Building Safe and Healthy Communities – Identifying data points, areas of focus, and building relationships among stakeholders – MI-PHY data indicated areas for community involvement • Youth lack of interest/feeling value in school • Violence in home and school • Rise in suicidal ideations
– Three focus areas for the work in the community • Restorative justice programming • Supporting the trauma-informed community (building resiliency) • Student engagement/youth voice
Success Network Updates • Kindergarten Readiness – Focus with daycare and preschool providers in 2016-2017 – Future funding for additional trainings is in review with change in Lenawee Cares
Success Network Updates • Reading by Third Grade – Pilot data is being collected and organized to determine the impact of a summer reading program on student “slide” or “melt”
Strategic Planning • First day on August 27 had over 50 participants • A variety of perspectives were represented in the group • The facilitation included review of the data profile • Support for the existing prioritized outcomes • Next meetings – September 15, 29, and October 6 (evenings)
StriveTogether Data Playbook • Most communities misunderstand the nature of this work. • Navigating trust, turf and time are the often overlooked elements of collaboration. • The seven principles for effective data sharing provides a solid foundation that communities can use across organizational boundaries to improve student supports.
7 Principles for Data Sharing Source: Strive Together and Data Quality Campaign, “Data Drives School-Community Collaboration: Seven Principles for Effective Data Sharing”, 2015
• • • •
Pave the way with leaders and decision makers Know your information ecosystem Only gather information if it leads to action Build responsible data use and protection into your organizational DNA • Identify your trusted local data hub(s) • Don’t blame it on FERPA • Invest in the people who will lead the work
Next Meetings Strategic Planning • September 15, 29 and October 6, 5:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m., TECH Center
National Convening • September 20-22, Memphis, Tennessee
Executive Team • September 27, 10 a.m. – noon, ESC Professional Development Room
Leadership Team • October 18, 10:00 a.m. – noon, ESC Community Room
Data Committee • October 13, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., Fireside Room
Lenawee Cradle to Career Partnership: Pathways to Success
Data Profile Update 09/15/16
Student Achievement Profile The Partnership has been tracking the postsecondary enrollment, persistence, and completion through the National Student Clearinghouse. Each cohort of high school graduates are tracked to determine if they attended a Title IV institution of higher education, return for a second year, and complete their post-secondary experience with a valued credential within six years. Below is a table showing post-secondary enrollment across multiple cohorts, persistence among multiple cohorts, and completion for the Class of 2010 after six years following high school graduation.1
Students in Michigan participated in new statewide assessment measures in the spring of 2015. M-STEP, the general education instruments for students, were provided online for students in a variety of subjects at various grade levels. The table below provides the percentage of students proficient in Lenawee County public schools in the Spring of 2015 and 2016.2 Grade Level 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th
English Language Arts Spring Spring 2015 2016 53.0 48.8 45.7 46.2 45.3 50.0 41.3 43.4 47.4 45.1 43.3 47.9 44.5 *
Math Spring 2015 51.7 36.8 28.6 29.5 34.0 32.3 27.8
Spring 2016 48.5 39.9 28.0 29.1 33.4 34.6 *
Science Spring 2015
Spring 2016
14.4
13.5
25.9 26.2
Social Studies Spring Spring 2015 2016 21.3
19.2
34.7 40.7
33.9 39.9
20.6 31.6
* The Michigan Department of Education used the scores from the SAT for these assessments.
Three of these assessments are aligned to our community outcomes. The table below provides the information disaggregated among our subpopulations.3
Community Outcome
All
Students of Non-White Ethnicity
Students Spring 2016 M-STEP 3rd Grade ELA Proficiency
Spring 2016 M-STEP 8th Grade Math Proficiency Spring 2016 M-STEP 7th Grade Science Proficiency
48.8%
34.6%
20.6%
Hispanic 42.4% Black 29.2%
Hispanic 24.7% Black 41.9% Hispanic 12.8% Black 7.7%
Students with Disabilities
Students Economically Disadvantaged
21.0%
40.2%
4.0%
22.6%
5.4%
12.0%
In the spring of 2016, high school juniors took the revised SAT assessment. According to the College Board, students with an SAT Evidence-Based Reading and Writing score that meets or exceeds the benchmark have a 75 percent chance of earning at least a C in first-semester, credit-bearing college courses in history, literature, social sciences, or writing classes. Students with an SAT Mathematics score that meets or exceeds the benchmark have a 75 percent chance of earning at least a C in first-semester, credit-bearing college courses in algebra, statistics, precalculus, or calculus. The graph below shows the percentage of Lenawee public school students who meet the College Board’s College Readiness Benchmark score in each subject as well as meeting the benchmarks in both subjects.4
100%
Spring 2016 SAT Percent of Grade 11 Students Who Met of Exceeded the College Readiness Benchmark, by County and State
90%
Lenawee County Statewide
80% 70% 62.4% 60%
60.2%
50% 40%
37.0%
36.9%
35.5%
34.9%
30% 20% 10% 0% Evidence Based Reading and Writing
Mathematics
Both Content Areas
Juniors in public school district take the ACT Work Keys Assessments in three areas: Applied Mathematics, Locating Information, and Reading for Information. These tests measure the work readiness skills found in jobs identified by employers in the WorkKeys database. Descriptions of student performance levels are found at http://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/workforce-solutions/act-workkeys/about-actworkkeys.html. Students can earn a National Career Readiness Certificate based upon their level scores on the three tests. The table below illustrates the number of students who received a National Career Readiness Certificate in the spring of 20165 NCRC Type
Threshold and Alignment
Number of Students (Total N =1033) 80
Low (no certificate earned) Bronze
does not score at least a level 3 in each of the three core areas
scores at least a level 3 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 16 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
186
Silver
scores at least a level 4 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 67 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
551
Gold
scores at least a level 5 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 93 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
215
Platinum
scores at least a level 6 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 99 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
1
Endnotes 1
National Student Clearinghouse, August 15, 2016, Data Committee Meeting 09/14/2016, accessed at http://www.lisd.us/lenawee-cradle-to-career-2/c2c-teams/data-team 217
Spring 2015 and 2016 M-STEP Results, accessed at www.mischooldata.org
3
Lenawee Cradle to Career Community Outcomes, Data Committee Meeting 09/14/2016, accessed at http://www.lisd.us/lenawee-cradle-to-career-2/c2c-teams/data-team/ 4
Lenawee County Spring 2016 College Readiness Results, accessed at www.mischooldata.org
5
Lenawee County Spring 2016 ACT WorkKeys Results, Data Committee Meeting 09/14/2016, accessed at http://www.lisd.us/lenawee-cradle-to-career-2/c2c-teams/data-team/
Lenawee Cradle to Career Continuous Improvement Action Plan Results: Write the SMART Goal for the Community Outcome using this format: The % of [student group] [quality description] in [outcome] will increase from [current reality %] to [goal %] by the end of [time period] as measured by [tool/process] administered on [specific date].
Current Conditions from Data Profile: Description of whole population
Current and trend student performance, including non-white, Hispanic, students receiving special education services, and students identified as economically disadvantaged
Factor Analysis What are the root causes of the community outcome will want to shape?
Strategies: What can the community partners do impact the community outcome for all students and for identified focus populations?
Action Plan What strategy?
Who is involved?
When will it occur?
What were the results?
Ground Rules • •
Decision Making toward consensus building Deliverables o Collect and disaggregate baseline data by key subpopulations for the core indicators o Prioritize a subset of core indicators
• •
Meetings held face to face and share electronic correspondence Stan serves as Point person for committee
From Individual Action to Collective Impact Collective Impact • A group working towards the same outcome, • Looking at student level data, • To continuously improve practices over time
Coordinated Impact • A group working on the same issue, • Sharing program level data • To identify best practices and align efforts
Individual Impact • Individual practioners working on specific issues
• Collecting qualitative and quantitative data • To demonstrate impact with individual students
Meeting Agenda 1:00 – 1:30 p.m.
Spring 2016 Statewide Assessment Results
1:30 – 2:15 p.m.
Success Network Updates
2:15 - 2:30 p.m.
LC2C Strategic Planning Update
2:30 – 3:00 p.m.
StriveTogether Data Playbook
Lenawee County Spring 2016 M-STEP Results Stan Masters Coordinator of Instructional Data Services September 1, 2016
• M-STEP
Sources of Data
– Public statewide results were released by MDE on August 30. – Public district results were released to www.MISchoolData.org on August 30. – Data represents the students in Lenawee County Public Schools, including students in LISD programs.
• Locations for Disaggregated, Student Level, and Test-Level Data – Disaggregated data from the Spring test is found at www.MISchoolData.org – Student Level data is found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected) – Test-Level strand/content expectation data for Science and Social Studies are found on the BAA Secure Site (password protected) – Test-Level claim/target data ELA and Math will be released later this fall on the BAA Secure Site (password protected) – Parent Reports have been sent to schools to distribute to students whom schools tested last year.
English Language Arts English Language Arts
English Language Arts English Language Arts English Language Arts Mathematics
Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics
Mathematics Science Science Science
Social Studies Social Studies Social Studies
0% English Language Arts
Lenawee County Spring 2016 M-STEP Percent Proficient, by grade and content area
100% Lenawee County
90% Statewide
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
3 4 5 6 7 8 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 7 11 5 8 11
Spring 2016 M-STEP ELA Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Lenawee County Statewide
English Language Arts 3 48.8% 46.0%
English Language Arts 4 46.2% 46.3%
English Language Arts 5 50.0% 50.6%
English Language Arts 6 43.4% 45.0%
English Language Arts 7 45.1% 47.1%
English Language Arts 8 47.9% 48.9%
Spring 2016 M-STEP Math Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80%
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0%
Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lenawee County 48.5% 39.9% 28.0% 29.1% 33.4% 34.6% Statewide 45.2% 44.0% 33.8% 32.8% 35.3% 32.7%
Spring 2016 M-STEP Science Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80%
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0% Lenawee County Statewide
Science 4 13.5% 14.7%
Science 7 20.6% 23.9%
Science 11 31.6% 33.0%
Spring 2016 M-STEP Social Studies Percent Proficient, by Grade 100% 90% 80%
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0% Lenawee County Statewide
Social Studies 5 19.2% 18.9%
Social Studies 8 33.9% 29.3%
Social Studies 11 39.9% 43.1%
M-STEP English Language Arts Change in Performance Level Spring 2015 to Spring 2016 Spring Spring Not Partially 2015 2016 Proficient Proficient Proficient Advanced Not Proficient 67% 29% 5% 0% Partially Proficient 23% 47% 28% 1% Proficient 4% 24% 57% 16% Advanced 0% 4% 29% 66%
M-STEP Mathematics Change in Performance Level Spring 2015 to Spring 2016 Spring Spring Not Partially 2015 2016 Proficient Proficient Proficient Advanced Not Proficient 75% 23% 2% 0% Partially Proficient 29% 53% 17% 1% Proficient 4% 36% 46% 14% Advanced 0% 6% 32% 62%
Lenawee County Spring 2016 SAT Results Stan Masters Coordinator of Instructional Data Services September 1, 2016
Sources of Data • College Readiness Scores – Public statewide results were released by MDE on August 30. – Public district results were released to www.MISchoolData.org on August 30. – Data represents the students in Lenawee County Public Schools, including students in LISD programs – Reports are found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected)
• District writing scores – Public statewide results were released by MDE on August 30. – Public district results, which do not count toward ACT’s College Readiness Benchmark, are available on www.MISchoolData.org – The College Board provides a data portal for schools (password protected) to analyze their data. – Data reports are found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected)
100%
Spring 2016 SAT Percent of Grade 11 Students Who Met of Exceeded the College Readiness Benchmark, by County and State
90%
Lenawee County Statewide
80% 70%
62.4% 60%
60.2%
50% 40%
37.0%
36.9%
35.5%
34.9%
30%
20% 10% 0% Evidence Based Reading and Writing
Mathematics
Both Content Areas
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Scores
Stan Masters LISD Coordinator of Instructional Data Services September 1, 2016
Context of this report • • • • • •
Data from Spring 2016 Work Keys Assessment Day 2 of Michigan Merit Exam All Juniors in public school district take these assessment N=1033 Public data on these results are not found on MISchoolData. Student Level data is found at www.datadirector.com/lisd (password protected) • Descriptions of student performance levels are found at http://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/workforcesolutions/act-workkeys/about-act-workkeys.html
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Applied Mathematics Score Level Distribution, by Number of Students 350 308 290
300
250 211 200
150
119 100
63 50
42
0 0
3
4
5
6
7
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Locating Information Score Level Distribution, by Number of Students 700 603
600
500
400
300 240 200 141 100 48
1
0 0
3
4
5
6
Spring 2016 Lenawee County WorkKeys Reading for Information Score Level Distribution, by Number of Students 500
466
450
400 350 300 261
250 212
200 150 100
50
21
34
34
0 0
3
4
5
6
7
Statistics WorkKeys Assessment
Applied Mathematics (7)
Locating Information (6)
Reading for Information (7)
4.8
3.9
4.9
5
4
5
6
4
5
Mean
Median
Mode
Overview of WorkKeys Assessments http://www.act.org/certificate/index.html
• Level scores related to National Career Readiness Certificate – Bronze • scores at least a level 3 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 16 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
– Silver • scores at least a level 4 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 67 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
– Gold • scores at least a level 5 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 93 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
– Platinum • scores at least a level 6 in each of the three core areas • necessary foundational skills for 99 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
National Career Readiness Certificate NCRC Indicator
Number of Students
Low
80
Bronze
186
Silver
551
Gold
215
Platinum
1
Lenawee County Community Outcome Current State, 09/13/16
Spring 2016 Kindergarten Readiness Spring 2016 M-STEP 3rd Grade ELA Proficiency Spring 2016 M-STEP 8th Grade Math Proficiency Spring 2016 M-STEP 7th Grade Science Proficiency Class of 2015 High School 4Year Graduation Rate Class of 2014 Post Secondary Enrollment within first 12 months Class of 2009 Post Secondary Completion within 6 years
All Students
Students of Non-White Ethnicity
Students with Disabilities
Students Economically Disadvantaged
48.8%
Hispanic 42.4% African American 29.2%
21.0%
40.2%
34.6%
Hispanic 24.7% African American 41.9%
4.0%
22.6%
20.6%
Hispanic 12.8% African American 7.7%
5.4%
12.0%
86.2%
Hispanic 86% African American 84%
60.3%
77.7%
69.0%
Hispanic 53.2% African American 55%
31.6%
Hispanic 18.9% African American 12%
50%
Updates on Student Success Networks
Success Network Updates • Post Secondary Enrollment and Completion – County counselors reviewing SAT scores at their Sept. mtg. – September 18-21–National College Access Network Conference Lenawee and State will be well represented – October 1 – FAFSA opens, using prior-year data – October 5 – LCAN Welcome Meeting @Tecumseh Community Room at the TPS Administration Building, 8:00 – 9:30 a.m. – October 20 – Principals/Counselors Conference – October 24-28 - College Awareness Week – Jackson College mentoring program will be supported by FirstYear Experience course – Tracking our certifications that students earn in this county is important for the 2016-2017 school year – Class of 2016 Post-Secondary Indicators nearly completed by all schools – Working with Career Cruising/MIBrightFuture to add more student features, with support from Region 9
Success Network Updates • Building Safe and Healthy Communities – Identifying data points, areas of focus, and building relationships among stakeholders – MI-PHY data indicated areas for community involvement • Youth lack of interest/feeling value in school • Violence in home and school • Rise in suicidal ideations
– Three focus areas for the work in the community • Restorative justice programming • Supporting the trauma-informed community (building resiliency) • Student engagement/youth voice
Success Network Updates • Kindergarten Readiness – Focus with daycare and preschool providers in 2016-2017 – Future funding for additional trainings is in review with change in Lenawee Cares
Success Network Updates • Reading by Third Grade – Pilot data is being collected and organized to determine the impact of a summer reading program on student “slide” or “melt”
Strategic Planning • First day on August 27 had over 50 participants • A variety of perspectives were represented in the group • The facilitation included review of the data profile • Support for the existing prioritized outcomes • Next meetings – September 15, 29, and October 6 (evenings)
StriveTogether Data Playbook • Most communities misunderstand the nature of this work. • Navigating trust, turf and time are the often overlooked elements of collaboration. • The seven principles for effective data sharing provides a solid foundation that communities can use across organizational boundaries to improve student supports.
7 Principles for Data Sharing Source: Strive Together and Data Quality Campaign, “Data Drives School-Community Collaboration: Seven Principles for Effective Data Sharing”, 2015
• • • •
Pave the way with leaders and decision makers Know your information ecosystem Only gather information if it leads to action Build responsible data use and protection into your organizational DNA • Identify your trusted local data hub(s) • Don’t blame it on FERPA • Invest in the people who will lead the work
Next Meetings Strategic Planning • September 15, 29 and October 6, 5:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m., TECH Center
National Convening • September 20-22, Memphis, Tennessee
Executive Team • September 27, 10 a.m. – noon, ESC Professional Development Room
Leadership Team • October 18, 10:00 a.m. – noon, ESC Community Room
Data Committee • October 13, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., Fireside Room
Lenawee Cradle to Career Partnership: Pathways to Success
Data Profile Update 09/15/16
Student Achievement Profile The Partnership has been tracking the postsecondary enrollment, persistence, and completion through the National Student Clearinghouse. Each cohort of high school graduates are tracked to determine if they attended a Title IV institution of higher education, return for a second year, and complete their post-secondary experience with a valued credential within six years. Below is a table showing post-secondary enrollment across multiple cohorts, persistence among multiple cohorts, and completion for the Class of 2010 after six years following high school graduation.1
Students in Michigan participated in new statewide assessment measures in the spring of 2015. M-STEP, the general education instruments for students, were provided online for students in a variety of subjects at various grade levels. The table below provides the percentage of students proficient in Lenawee County public schools in the Spring of 2015 and 2016.2 Grade Level 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th
English Language Arts Spring Spring 2015 2016 53.0 48.8 45.7 46.2 45.3 50.0 41.3 43.4 47.4 45.1 43.3 47.9 44.5 *
Math Spring 2015 51.7 36.8 28.6 29.5 34.0 32.3 27.8
Spring 2016 48.5 39.9 28.0 29.1 33.4 34.6 *
Science Spring 2015
Spring 2016
14.4
13.5
25.9 26.2
Social Studies Spring Spring 2015 2016 21.3
19.2
34.7 40.7
33.9 39.9
20.6 31.6
* The Michigan Department of Education used the scores from the SAT for these assessments.
Three of these assessments are aligned to our community outcomes. The table below provides the information disaggregated among our subpopulations.3
Community Outcome
All
Students of Non-White Ethnicity
Students Spring 2016 M-STEP 3rd Grade ELA Proficiency
Spring 2016 M-STEP 8th Grade Math Proficiency Spring 2016 M-STEP 7th Grade Science Proficiency
48.8%
34.6%
20.6%
Hispanic 42.4% Black 29.2%
Hispanic 24.7% Black 41.9% Hispanic 12.8% Black 7.7%
Students with Disabilities
Students Economically Disadvantaged
21.0%
40.2%
4.0%
22.6%
5.4%
12.0%
In the spring of 2016, high school juniors took the revised SAT assessment. According to the College Board, students with an SAT Evidence-Based Reading and Writing score that meets or exceeds the benchmark have a 75 percent chance of earning at least a C in first-semester, credit-bearing college courses in history, literature, social sciences, or writing classes. Students with an SAT Mathematics score that meets or exceeds the benchmark have a 75 percent chance of earning at least a C in first-semester, credit-bearing college courses in algebra, statistics, precalculus, or calculus. The graph below shows the percentage of Lenawee public school students who meet the College Board’s College Readiness Benchmark score in each subject as well as meeting the benchmarks in both subjects.4
100%
Spring 2016 SAT Percent of Grade 11 Students Who Met of Exceeded the College Readiness Benchmark, by County and State
90%
Lenawee County Statewide
80% 70% 62.4% 60%
60.2%
50% 40%
37.0%
36.9%
35.5%
34.9%
30% 20% 10% 0% Evidence Based Reading and Writing
Mathematics
Both Content Areas
Juniors in public school district take the ACT Work Keys Assessments in three areas: Applied Mathematics, Locating Information, and Reading for Information. These tests measure the work readiness skills found in jobs identified by employers in the WorkKeys database. Descriptions of student performance levels are found at http://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/workforce-solutions/act-workkeys/about-actworkkeys.html. Students can earn a National Career Readiness Certificate based upon their level scores on the three tests. The table below illustrates the number of students who received a National Career Readiness Certificate in the spring of 20165 NCRC Type
Threshold and Alignment
Number of Students (Total N =1033) 80
Low (no certificate earned) Bronze
does not score at least a level 3 in each of the three core areas
scores at least a level 3 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 16 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
186
Silver
scores at least a level 4 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 67 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
551
Gold
scores at least a level 5 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 93 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
215
Platinum
scores at least a level 6 in each of the three core areas necessary foundational skills for 99 percent of the jobs in the WorkKeys database
1
Endnotes 1
National Student Clearinghouse, August 15, 2016, Data Committee Meeting 09/14/2016, accessed at http://www.lisd.us/lenawee-cradle-to-career-2/c2c-teams/data-team 217
Spring 2015 and 2016 M-STEP Results, accessed at www.mischooldata.org
3
Lenawee Cradle to Career Community Outcomes, Data Committee Meeting 09/14/2016, accessed at http://www.lisd.us/lenawee-cradle-to-career-2/c2c-teams/data-team/ 4
Lenawee County Spring 2016 College Readiness Results, accessed at www.mischooldata.org
5
Lenawee County Spring 2016 ACT WorkKeys Results, Data Committee Meeting 09/14/2016, accessed at http://www.lisd.us/lenawee-cradle-to-career-2/c2c-teams/data-team/
Lenawee Cradle to Career Continuous Improvement Action Plan Results: Write the SMART Goal for the Community Outcome using this format: The % of [student group] [quality description] in [outcome] will increase from [current reality %] to [goal %] by the end of [time period] as measured by [tool/process] administered on [specific date].
Current Conditions from Data Profile: Description of whole population
Current and trend student performance, including non-white, Hispanic, students receiving special education services, and students identified as economically disadvantaged
Factor Analysis What are the root causes of the community outcome will want to shape?
Strategies: What can the community partners do impact the community outcome for all students and for identified focus populations?
Action Plan What strategy?
Who is involved?
When will it occur?
What were the results?
