Massing Concepts - Arlingtonva
Massing Concepts November 10, 2015
1
Items for Consideration and Direction Which of the two massing concepts should be pursued? Affirm joint use by County and APS Funding allows for 150 surface parking spaces. Should underground
parking be considered? Should County staff consider using ‘Construction Manager at Risk’ for project delivery?
2
Overview
FY 2015-2024 CIP Funding for LRCC Replacement: $28 M Early Community Vision Sessions held in April 2015: Preserve and maximize green space Improve site access and safety Integrate the building into the park Include multi-purpose athletic courts, exercise rooms, fitness and multi-purpose flexible use spaces County and School Board direction in July 2015: Explore the possibility of including Pre-K classrooms Shared amenities to serve APS and community programs APS Program: 4 Pre-K classrooms and support space 3
Conceptual Studies
Site arrangement and building massing APS spaces direct access to dedicated playground and ground level exits DPR entries from N George Mason and park sides DPR outdoor spaces increased DPR consolidations – admin functions, Sr. Center from Culpepper Gardens Surface parking – 150 spaces Case 1 – APS dedicated rec space, Case 2 – shared gym Case – Areas
DPR
APS
Shared
Total
Concept Est $ M
1 – APS rec space
31,000
12,000
2,000
45,000
$29.5
2 - Shared gym
29,000
8,000
16,000
53,000
$34.7
4
Case 1 Spaces Upper Level (DPR Administrative Program) Main Level (open to Park side)
Lower Level (open to GM Drive)
5
Case 1 Site Plan – From Park
150 Car Parking Lot
6
Case1 - George Mason Frontage
7
Case 2 Spaces Upper Level (DPR Administrative Program)
Main Level (open to Park side)
Lower Level (open to GM Drive)
8
Case 2 Site Plan – From Park
150 Car Parking Lot
9
Case 2 – George Mason Frontage
10
Timeline Spring –Fall: 2015 Concept development, Joint Use program defined Fall, 2015: Board Guidance: Joint use, building size, parking Winter 2015-Winter 2016 A/E selection Community engagement MOU with APS CMAR selection (if alternate delivery method used) Design completion Fall 2016 Bond Referendum for construction Spring 2017-Spring 2019 Construction Summer 2019 Opening 11
1
Items for Consideration and Direction Which of the two massing concepts should be pursued? Affirm joint use by County and APS Funding allows for 150 surface parking spaces. Should underground
parking be considered? Should County staff consider using ‘Construction Manager at Risk’ for project delivery?
2
Overview
FY 2015-2024 CIP Funding for LRCC Replacement: $28 M Early Community Vision Sessions held in April 2015: Preserve and maximize green space Improve site access and safety Integrate the building into the park Include multi-purpose athletic courts, exercise rooms, fitness and multi-purpose flexible use spaces County and School Board direction in July 2015: Explore the possibility of including Pre-K classrooms Shared amenities to serve APS and community programs APS Program: 4 Pre-K classrooms and support space 3
Conceptual Studies
Site arrangement and building massing APS spaces direct access to dedicated playground and ground level exits DPR entries from N George Mason and park sides DPR outdoor spaces increased DPR consolidations – admin functions, Sr. Center from Culpepper Gardens Surface parking – 150 spaces Case 1 – APS dedicated rec space, Case 2 – shared gym Case – Areas
DPR
APS
Shared
Total
Concept Est $ M
1 – APS rec space
31,000
12,000
2,000
45,000
$29.5
2 - Shared gym
29,000
8,000
16,000
53,000
$34.7
4
Case 1 Spaces Upper Level (DPR Administrative Program) Main Level (open to Park side)
Lower Level (open to GM Drive)
5
Case 1 Site Plan – From Park
150 Car Parking Lot
6
Case1 - George Mason Frontage
7
Case 2 Spaces Upper Level (DPR Administrative Program)
Main Level (open to Park side)
Lower Level (open to GM Drive)
8
Case 2 Site Plan – From Park
150 Car Parking Lot
9
Case 2 – George Mason Frontage
10
Timeline Spring –Fall: 2015 Concept development, Joint Use program defined Fall, 2015: Board Guidance: Joint use, building size, parking Winter 2015-Winter 2016 A/E selection Community engagement MOU with APS CMAR selection (if alternate delivery method used) Design completion Fall 2016 Bond Referendum for construction Spring 2017-Spring 2019 Construction Summer 2019 Opening 11
