partnerships that work

Report 2 Downloads 127 Views
MORRISVILLE, NC COMPREHENSIVE PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN MAY 16, 2017

Town Council Strategy & Feedback Sessions

Agenda 





Team Introduction & Overview of Master Planning Process Review of Demographics and Recreation Trends Discussion: Strengths/Weaknesses  Park

facilities & maintenance  Park operations & staffing  Park programs 

Benchmarking & Level of Service - Update

Master Plan Team Rachel Cotter – McAdams Margaret Bransford – PROS Michael Vampran – McAdams

Master Plan Process Existing Conditions Inventory + Analysis Community Input Vision + Goals

Needs + Standards/Trends

Recommendations + Strategies Master Plan Development

Action Plan

Demographic Overview – Town Limits

2016 Total Population

2016 Total Households

2016 Population Median Age

23,174

9,354

34.1

2016 Median Household Income

2016 Minority Percentage

$86,836

51%

Population Growth – Town Limits

Population Growth – 2 Mile Buffer

COMPARATIVE INCOME CHARACTERISTICS

M O R RISVIL LE 2 - M ILE B UF FER

N O R TH C A R O LI NA

$54,149

$29,472

$25,920 $46,868

$44,057

$86,836 $41,123

Median Household Income

$89,929

Per Capita Income

U.S .A .

General Sports Trends - Local TOWN LIMITS

2-MILE BUFFER

Fitness Trends - Local TOWN LIMITS

2-MILE BUFFER

Outdoor Activity Trends - Local TOWN LIMITS

2-MILE BUFFER

SWOT Analysis •

• •

Facilities Operations & Staff Programs

Facility Summary •

• •

9 Active / Managed Parks: 136.97 ac Open space: 64.01 ac Other Maintained: 1.90 ac

Standard

Town of Morrisville

NRPA Standard

Deficiency

Acres Parkland per 1,000 Population

5.91ac

9.6ac

85 ac

1 / 2,266 = 10 parks

1 park

Number of Parks per 1 / 2,575 Population = 9 parks

*all figures are based on 2016 population data

92% of the community believe well-maintained parks add to the quality of life in the community.

Operations & Staff Summary Standard

Town of Morrisville

NRPA Standard

Deficiency

Operating Budget per Capita

$60.04

$77.32

$17.28

% Expenditure Recovery via Revenue Generation

60.5%

29.1%

+40.0%

7.3

2.5

Number of FTE Staff 4.8 per 10,000 residents

Strengths & Weaknesses Catalyst Questions • Do you find existing parks are large enough and distributed frequently / evenly throughout the community? • Do you find the existing facilities offer a diverse range of recreation opportunities to meet resident needs and interests? • Do you find existing facilities are able to support the demand for programs?

Strengths & Weaknesses Catalyst Questions (cont.) • Are there specialty facilities lacking at existing facilities (ie, splash pad, ropes course, environmental education, skate park / pump track) • What are the pro’s and con’s of offering programs to residents vs non-residents?

Strengths & Weaknesses Catalyst Questions (cont.) • What compliments or constraints do you hear from your constituents? • Do you feel the current program offerings are appropriate for the demographics trends? • Do you find the UDO requirements regarding open space and public recreation space dedication / fee-in-lieu effective?

Benchmark Communities 5-7 COMMUNITIES    





Holly Springs Wake Forest Apex Matthews / Davidson / Cornelius Flower Mound / Sugar Land, TX Plainfield, IN

METRICS FOR ID      

Demographics Geography Budget Similar/Aspirational CAPRA Relationship

Level of Service Worksheet

Next Steps Thank you! Rachel Cotter [email protected] Margaret Bransford [email protected]