Patterns of Agricultural and Structural Transformation in ...

Report 11 Downloads 12 Views
IGIDR Proceedings/Projects Series

PP-069-19a

Constraints and Opportunities for Sustainable Agricultural Production in Bihar By PK Joshi, Madhur Gautam and Gaurav Tripathi

Workshop on POLICY OPTIONS AND INVESTMENT PRIORITIES FOR ACCELERATING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA NOVEMBER 10-11, 2011 India International Centre, New Delhi Organized by

Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai and Institute for Human Development, New Delhi

Supported by

Planning Commission

Food and Agriculture Organization

The World Bank

Constraints and Opportunities for Sustainable Agricultural Production in Bihar

P K Joshi*, Madhur Gautam** and Gaurav Tripathi* * International Food Policy Research Institute NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012 Indi * * The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

Issues covered  Document

key problems in agriculture  Identify opportunities for higher and sustainable agricultural production  Propose interventions for increasing agricultural production and sequencing priorities

International Food Policy Research Institute

Agro-ecological map of Bihar

NWZ: NEZ: South (E &W)

1040-1450 mm 1200-1700 mm 990-1300 mm

International Food Policy Research Institute

Sandy loam & loam Loam to clay loam Sandy loam, clay loam and clay

I Key Problems for Sustainable Agricultural Production

Salient characteristics of Bihar agriculture  

Abundant water; abundant sun shine; abundant labour Concurrent twin problems 

 

Small & fragmented holdings Low productivity 

  

High risk of flood and drought

High poverty and under-nourishment

Underdeveloped institutions Poor infrastructure Low public investment

International Food Policy Research Institute

Public investment in agriculture, irrigation & flood control (% of GSDP) 16

14.59

14 12

10.61

10

6

6.3

6.34

5.38

5.32

4.07

4

2.52

8.87

8.1

7.8

8

5.27 3.64

2.78

2.27

10.12

4.25

4.47

2009-10

2010-11

2 0 2005-06

2006-07

2007-08 Agri

International Food Policy Research Institute

2008-09

Irri + Flood

Total

Smallholder agriculture 100% 90%

0.7 3 6.7

70%

19.6

60%

40% 30%

9.3 18.2

80%

50%





89.6 53



20% 10% 0%

Holdings Area 4.0 ha

Tiny size of holding  0.43 ha in 2005/06  0.75 ha in 1995/96 2.0 t/ha; contribute about 1/3 rice production

Wheat   

36% area is still having yield < 2.0 t/h This accounts 36% of total wheat production Positive side: 28% area yields > 2.5 t/ha; contribute 38% wheat production

International Food Policy Research Institute

Low yields & high spatial disparity 

Maize  



About 1/3 area is having yield < 1.5 t/ha Positive side: 17% area yields > 4.0 t/ha; contribute about 28% maize production; and 53% area having yields >3.0 t/ha; contribute 1/3 maize production

Pulses   

About half of the area is still having yield < 0.8 t/h This accounts for 40% of total pulses production Only 10% area yields > 1.0 t/ha; contributes 12% pulse production

International Food Policy Research Institute

Key biotic constraints 

Paddy 



Maize 



Sheath blight (25-40%); bacterial leaf blight (25%); Blast (100%); stem borer (25-40%) Stem borer (25-40%); termite (100%)

Wheat 

Rust (25-40%)

International Food Policy Research Institute



Lentil 



Pod borer (Up to 50%)

Vegetable (brinjal) 

Stem borer and pod borer (25-40%)

Key abiotic constraints 

Flood 

41.4% of cropped area is flood-prone; about 2199 thousand ha (Flood years 2004-05, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2010-11)



Drought



Almost every year for past 4-5 years Soil sodicity 





Soil acidity 



3.0 lakh ha area under salinity/alkalinity 23.6 lakh ha area under soil-acidity (25.1% of geographical area)

Waterlogging 

6.28 lakh ha area is water-logged

International Food Policy Research Institute

Inadequate institutions & poor infrastructure 

Markets are underdeveloped    



Credit 



Rs 3,930 per ha (March 2008, as per Annual Credit Plan)

Insurance 



Thinly spread markets: 0.6 per thousand square kilometer Prices below MSP during the marketing season - 15% for rice; -9% for maize and -7% for wheat in major mandies These are even much lower in local markets (villages)

Still at infancy stage

Cold storage 

1.5 per thousand square kilometer

International Food Policy Research Institute

II Opportunities for Higher and Sustainable Production

How to unleashing opportunities? Harness untapped yield reservoir  Leverage power of improved technologies  Utilize fallow lands  Promote agricultural diversification 



4 pronged strategy   



Innovations Institutions Incentives Infrastructure





International Food Policy Research Institute

High-value & remunerative commodities Labor absorbing & water efficient commodities

1. Bridge the yield gaps Rice yield gaps: FLD and sate average (t/ha) 

Yield gap: 131-300%   

FLD yield: 6.29 t/ha State avg: 1.55 t/ha 0.5 t/ha in Bhagalpur to 2.9 t/ha in Bhojpur

Rajendra Mahsuri-1; Rajendra Sweta  Swarna-Sub 1 for flood

prone areas

International Food Policy Research Institute

Yield gaps in dairy sector Milk yield l/animal/year Items

Experiment station yield (Maximum) Attainable yield (Maximum) Average actual farm Yield Yield gap I Yield gap II Yield gap I % of Experiment station yield Yield gap II % of attainable International Food Policy Research Institute

Crossbred Indigenous Buffalo

7275

2768

3200

3386 1541

1589 910

2610 1560

3889 1845 79

1179 679 67

590 1050 51

54

43

40

2. Connect invention to innovation:

potential of hybrid rice Yield Average Districts range, t/ha yield, t/ha West Singhbhun (4.81); Dumka < 5.00 4.67 (4.29); Chatra (4.92)

5.0 – 6.0

5.75

Ranchi (5.72); Godde (5.64); Koderne (5.90)

6.0 – 7.0

6.33

Lohardaga (6.03); Shibganj (6.89); Palamau (6.06)

> 7.00

7.43

Bokaro (7.54); Gharwa (7.06); Dhanbad (7.98); Pakur (7.07); East Singhbhum (7.54)

International Food Policy Research Institute

3. Emerging hybrid maize in Bihar (yields t/ha) 6.66 Winter

3.18 2.41

5.66 Rainy

2.63 1.7 0

1

2

3 Local

International Food Policy Research Institute

4 Composite

5 Hybrids

6

7

4. High potential of management practices 

Conservation agriculture  

Direct seeded rice (DSR) and zero tillage in wheat Systems of rice intensification (SRI) (selected location with caution)

Laser land leveling  Efficient water management  Fish production in waterlogged areas  Promote fish-duck production  Manage degraded lands (acidic and sodic soild) 

International Food Policy Research Institute

5. Harness potential of rice-fallow Extent of rabi-fallow area 11.6

10 9.5

8 6 4

18

4.4

1.7

ia

es

19

Ind

MP

ar

sa

15

W

Be

Or is

38

Bih

1.2

0

10

2.2

4S tat

2

ng al

Rice-fallow area, m ha

12

Rabi fallow as of kharif rice. %

80

78

60 40

37

31

20

47

37

38

Ind ia

4S tate s

MP

ar Bih

al eng

WB

Ori

ssa

0

International Food Policy Research Institute

Orissa

W Bengal

Bihar

MP

Other

Constraints to use rice-fallow lands 

Abiotic 



Crop improvement 



Source of information: 88-97% by NGOs & 14-23% by extension staff

Grazing lands 



Lack of inputs and cash to buy seeds and other inputs (>90%)

Access to information about varieties and management 



Lack of short duration pulses and rice varieties (64-97%); pest problems (30-62%)

Resource constraints 



Low residual moisture (91-97%); terminal drought (63-78%)

Crop damage due to grazing (almost 100%)

Missing markets 

High production risk (22-60%) and price risk (18-46%)

International Food Policy Research Institute

6. Agricultural diversification: Share of food commodities in value of agricultural output, %

Paddy Wheat Maize Pulses F & Veg L’stock Others

1990/ 91

2000/ 01

2008 /09

20 14 3

13 11 3

11 9 2

7 14 30

3 36 15

2 24 42

12

9

10

 

Diversification towards livestock sector F & V and L’stock shares 66% in VOAO  



Declining size of holdings Rising demands

COMFED (dairy) 

Membership up  



Milk collection up  

International Food Policy Research Institute

17.282 m in 1999/00 48.96 m in 2010/11 281.08 th kg/day in 1999/00 608.38 th kg/day in 2006-07

High potential of horticulture sector 

Mango 



Darbhanga, Vaishali, East Champaran and West Champaran

Vegetables 

Potato, brinjal, cauliflower, tomato, onion



Patna, Nalanda, Saran, Gopalganj, E & W Champaran, Madhubani, Saharsha

Litchi and banana 





Muzzaferpur, Vaishali

Guava 

Rohtas, Bhojpur



Floriculture  

International Food Policy Research Institute

Rose, gladiolus, jasmine (bela), marigold and tuberose Patna, Muzzaferpur, Vaishali, Smastipur, Gaya

Poultry and fish 

Egg production 



Egg production went up from 740 million in 2001-02 to 1101 million in 2009-10

Fish  

Fish production almost remained stagnated in Bihar ranged between 2.67 and 3.06 lakh tons Saran, Muzzaffarpur, Sitamarhi, West Champaran, East Champaran, Darbhanga, Samistipur, Madhubani, Saharsa. Katihar

International Food Policy Research Institute

7. Prospects for agro-processing sector 

  



Bihar food market: US$ 9000 m & expected to grow to US$ 19,000 m by 2015 (110% increase)  45% is processed food market Prospects for cereals, pulses, oilseeds Rice milling installed capacity is inadequate Maize processing insignificant  Starch, corn oil, corn flacks, poultry feed Fruits, vegetables, sugarcane, potato, tobacco, etc 



Fruit juice, fruit pulp, squash, pickles, tomato sauces/pulp/paste, jam/jelly, fruit beverages

Makhana processing

International Food Policy Research Institute

Constraints in agro-processing sector Agro-processing is with the unorganized sector  Absence of pre-processing facilities 





High post-harvest losses 



Pre-cooling, cooling, grading, sorting, pack houses Papaya: 30-50%; Banana: 15-25%; Cabbage: 41-44%; Potato, Brinjal, Onion, cauliflower: 33%

Power is a major constraint

International Food Policy Research Institute

III Interventions for Accelerating Sustainable Agricultural Production

Needed interventions and way forward 

More investment in agriculture    



Reprioritize research agenda 



Flood control, irrigation & drainage management; land development Drainage canal from north to south Develop markets Agricultural research and extension More multi-disciplinary, sub-regional and more focus on management of natural resources

Connect invention and innovation   

Massive seed production program: Hybrids (maize, vegetables) Saplings of fruit trees Promote climate smart agriculture (such as conservation agriculture; land management, water management)

International Food Policy Research Institute

Interventions…. 

Provide incentives to connect farmers with markets 

Special agriculture zone 

  



Cereals, fruits, vegetables, poultry, fish

Adopt Model Market Act Attract corporate sector for investment in markets, agro-processing and land development Enforce regulatory mechanisms for assured prices, and other market related risks

Strengthen institutions   

Land reforms (consolidation, ownership….) Pro-poor (smallholder agriculture): collective production and marketing, contract farming, farmers’ cooperatives Strengthen credit, insurance, services, and extension services

International Food Policy Research Institute

Marching for prosperity through agriculture

Thank you

International Food Policy Research Institute