sent to Standard Chartered Frankfurt and Makati offices through: https
sent to Standard Chartered Frankfurt and Makati offices through: https://forms.online.standardchartered.com/public_website/group/contact_us2/
I refer to my conversation on September 19, 2014 with Standard Chartered Frankfurt office, in which Standard Chartered requested further information on Account No. 8162233172 0, Code 116100 as identified on page 6 of https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Standard+Chartered.pdf
Mr. Wolfgang Struck has advised as follows: "The money was deposited in 1972 in account name Severino Garcia Sta. Romana a.k.a. Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz as part of page 11 lower portion lines 5/8 from the bottom. All existing accounts were then transferred to Marcos in pertaining 'Instruction Memoranda' and ensuing 1973 WAIVER in Interest and Rights from Jose Antonio Diaz to Marcos using the pseudonym "Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia" Accordingly, please inform me of the amount with accrued interest that is now on deposit in this account. Upon receiving this information, I shall give Standard Chartered payment instructions in order to effect the authorized disbursement from this account. Sincerely, Karen Hudes Acting General Counsel International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Legal Counsel Global Debt Facility 1 301 229-0058 P.S. Please disregard the following notice: "Opening https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Standard+Chartered.pdf Some files can contain files or otherwise be harmful to your computer. It is important to be certain that this file is from a trustworthy source. Would you like to open this file?" Those who are interfering by inserting illegal notices such as the foregoing are certain to regret this interference.
DEED(s) OF ASSIGNMENT as signed by Fr. Antonio Diaz to “Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcua” and by Ferdinand Marcos in favor of “Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia” The legal effect of a deed of assignment executed between an owner-assignor of a right or an asset like gold or cash deposit in a bank on the one hand giving up and transferring his right(s) to an assignee/new owner of that assigned deposit on the other hand receiving and accepting the right(s) and assuming the role of successor-in-interest-and-rights vis-à-vis the depository bank is immediate and irrevocable (there must be “consideration”, though, and Marcos thought of that, to be sure, see attached), even if the bank where the asset is retained is not informed or not informed yet. No specific form is needed for the deed, no perfect language, as long as it is clear 1) who the assignor is, 2) what the asset assigned is, and 3) who the assignee is.
“The effect of a valid deed of assignment is to extinguish privity between the assignor and the obligor (the corresponding depository bank) and to create instead privity between the obligor (the bank with the secretly assigned accounts) and the assignee. Privity is the legal term for a close, mutual, or successive relationship to the same right of property” (wikipedia). Holding privity, as the special knowledge of a secret relationship with the depository bank and its top officials, as transferred from the original trustee/owner Jose Antonio Diaz via Legal Counsel and temporary de-facto administrator over all assets, Ferdinand E. Marcos, to the assignee/ successorin-interest-and-rights, “Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia”, that special knowledge of a secret relationship is now between any of the depository banks and Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia with Dr. Garcia or his representative holding the necessary credentials and valid, authenticated, and legalized documents to warrant privity between him and the obligor, the depository bank.
In fairness and justice there would be no problem for the assignee/successor. The banks have signed bank agreements with the trust depositor to the effect that they will preserve the assets retained in the bank until maturity 2005 and beyond. But what if the chosen banks which are held to “CLOAKED FOR SECRECY” on top of regular bank secrecy laws (and egged on by BIS and FED maybe) do not cooperate in any way and insist that they do not have any such asset and that they have to demand “original bank-generated documents”? Those are inside the vault assigned in the depository bank. WS July 7, 2014
I refer to my conversation on September 19, 2014 with Standard Chartered Frankfurt office, in which Standard Chartered requested further information on Account No. 8162233172 0, Code 116100 as identified on page 6 of https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Standard+Chartered.pdf
Mr. Wolfgang Struck has advised as follows: "The money was deposited in 1972 in account name Severino Garcia Sta. Romana a.k.a. Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz as part of page 11 lower portion lines 5/8 from the bottom. All existing accounts were then transferred to Marcos in pertaining 'Instruction Memoranda' and ensuing 1973 WAIVER in Interest and Rights from Jose Antonio Diaz to Marcos using the pseudonym "Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia" Accordingly, please inform me of the amount with accrued interest that is now on deposit in this account. Upon receiving this information, I shall give Standard Chartered payment instructions in order to effect the authorized disbursement from this account. Sincerely, Karen Hudes Acting General Counsel International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Legal Counsel Global Debt Facility 1 301 229-0058 P.S. Please disregard the following notice: "Opening https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Standard+Chartered.pdf Some files can contain files or otherwise be harmful to your computer. It is important to be certain that this file is from a trustworthy source. Would you like to open this file?" Those who are interfering by inserting illegal notices such as the foregoing are certain to regret this interference.
DEED(s) OF ASSIGNMENT as signed by Fr. Antonio Diaz to “Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcua” and by Ferdinand Marcos in favor of “Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia” The legal effect of a deed of assignment executed between an owner-assignor of a right or an asset like gold or cash deposit in a bank on the one hand giving up and transferring his right(s) to an assignee/new owner of that assigned deposit on the other hand receiving and accepting the right(s) and assuming the role of successor-in-interest-and-rights vis-à-vis the depository bank is immediate and irrevocable (there must be “consideration”, though, and Marcos thought of that, to be sure, see attached), even if the bank where the asset is retained is not informed or not informed yet. No specific form is needed for the deed, no perfect language, as long as it is clear 1) who the assignor is, 2) what the asset assigned is, and 3) who the assignee is.
“The effect of a valid deed of assignment is to extinguish privity between the assignor and the obligor (the corresponding depository bank) and to create instead privity between the obligor (the bank with the secretly assigned accounts) and the assignee. Privity is the legal term for a close, mutual, or successive relationship to the same right of property” (wikipedia). Holding privity, as the special knowledge of a secret relationship with the depository bank and its top officials, as transferred from the original trustee/owner Jose Antonio Diaz via Legal Counsel and temporary de-facto administrator over all assets, Ferdinand E. Marcos, to the assignee/ successorin-interest-and-rights, “Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia”, that special knowledge of a secret relationship is now between any of the depository banks and Rev. Dr. Floro E. Garcia with Dr. Garcia or his representative holding the necessary credentials and valid, authenticated, and legalized documents to warrant privity between him and the obligor, the depository bank.
In fairness and justice there would be no problem for the assignee/successor. The banks have signed bank agreements with the trust depositor to the effect that they will preserve the assets retained in the bank until maturity 2005 and beyond. But what if the chosen banks which are held to “CLOAKED FOR SECRECY” on top of regular bank secrecy laws (and egged on by BIS and FED maybe) do not cooperate in any way and insist that they do not have any such asset and that they have to demand “original bank-generated documents”? Those are inside the vault assigned in the depository bank. WS July 7, 2014
