Shenot J Community Solar Presentation

Report 2 Downloads 163 Views
Community Solar: Connecting with Customers and Working through the Public Policy Challenges 2015 Utility Solar Conference San Diego, California

Presented by John Shenot April 29, 2015

The Regulatory Assistance Project

50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602

Phone: 802-223-8199 www.raponline.org

Customers Want Solar Do you think that as a country, the United States should put more emphasis, less emphasis or about the same emphasis as it does now on producing domestic energy from each of the following sources?

% More Emphasis

% Same Emphasis

% Less Emphasis

Solar

79

12

9

Wind

70

14

14

Natural Gas

55

32

12

Oil

41

27

30

Nuclear Power

35

28

33

Coal

28

27

43

Source: Gallup Poll; March 2015

2

They Want Solar on Their Homes and Businesses

Source: SolarCity and Clean Edge; March 2015 Poll of U.S. Homeowners

3

All Sorts of Customers!

4

Rooftop PV is Increasingly Affordable

5

But… Deployment of Rooftop PV is Constrained by Other Factors × I’m a renter × I expect to move to a new home soon × I can’t get financing × My rooftop isn’t suitable

6

My Rooftop Isn’t Suitable!

Only 22-27% of Residential Roof Area is Suitable for PV

Source: NREL 2008.

7

Community Solar Addresses the Biggest Non-Cost Constraints Credits can attach to your bill, even if you rent, and move with you to a new location (in the same utility’s service territory) Some programs provide access to nomoney-down, low-interest, no-fee financing Community projects are sited in suitable/optimal locations 8

Public Policy Challenges

9

Key Challenges for Community Solar • Laws, regulations or utility commission decisions limit who can offer it • Net metering/solar tariff design: – Can make community solar contrary to utility’s or customer’s self-interest – Can lead to undue cross-subsidies

• Retail rate design: – Can undermine cost-effectiveness/add risk 10

Where are the programs?

3rd Party Solar PV Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) www.dsireusa.org / March 2015

RI: May be limited

IA: See notes

to certain sectors

NV: With system size limitations

CO: With system UT: Limited to size limitations certain sectors

DC VA: Limited within a certain utility's service territory

AZ: Limited to certain sectors TX: With system size limitations

At Least 24 States U.S. Territories PR

Guam

USVI

NMI

Apparently disallowed by state or otherwise restricted by legal barriers Authorized by state or otherwise currently in use, at least in certain jurisdictions Status unclear or unknown

+ Washington DC and Puerto Rico Authorize or Allow 3rd Party Solar PV Power

Customer Credits for Monthly Net Excess Generation (NEG) Under Net Metering www.dsireusa.org / March 2015

DC

NEG at retail rate (or above); credits do not expire

NEG at less than retail rate (e.g., avoided cost rate)

NEG at retail rate at first, then credits expire or are reduced (e.g., to the avoided cost rate) after set period of time

NEG at $0

No uniform or statewide mandatory net metering rules

14

Keys to Long-Term Success • Authorization: explicitly allow community solar programs (utility, 3rd party, or both) • 3rd Party Siting: involve the utility • Solar Tariffs: customers should receive fair and just compensation for the power they supply – no more and no less • Subsidies: if any, should be provided outside of the utility bill (e.g., tax credit) 15

More Keys to Long-Term Success • Rate design: – Customers should be able to connect to the grid for no more than the cost of connecting to the grid – Customers should pay for grid services and power supply in proportion to how much they use, and when they use it

• Consider utility incentives and decoupling utility revenues from sales 16

Thank You for Your Time and Attention About RAP The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) is a global, non-profit team of experts focused on the long-term economic and environmental sustainability of the power and natural gas sectors. RAP has deep expertise in regulatory and market policies to:  Promote economic efficiency  Protect the environment  Ensure system reliability  Allocate system benefits fairly among all consumers Learn more about RAP at www.raponline.org

John Shenot: [email protected]