Student Representative Assembly Meeting 13I
Student Representative Assembly Meeting 13I Sunday, November 3, 2013 at 6:30 pm Council Chambers, GH 111
Called to Order at 6:31 pm CALL OF THE ROLL Present
Absent Excused Absent Late Others Present
Chair
Abbas, Brodka, Campbell, Candemir, A. D’Angela, D. D’Angela, Dicenzo, D’Mello, Doucet, Garasia, Gillis, Graham, Guarna, Harper, Jeyasingham, Leslie, Loewig, Long, MacKinnon, Mallon, Morrow, Narro Perez, Palczewski, Paul, Pullen, Rheaume, Sparrow, Wolwowicz Tichenkov Jacob Klugsberg (TAC Coordinator), Ana Qarri (Silhouette Staff reporter), Emily Brown (MSU Member), Dave Moore (MSUAA), Lindsey Craig (MSU Member), Teddy Saull (MSU Member), Victoria Scott (Recording Secretary) Maria Daniel
ADOPTION OF AGENDA Moved by Graham, seconded by Garasia that the agenda be adopted as amended. Amendment Moved by Rheaume, seconded by Sparrow to amend motion #11 to read: “Moved by Sparrow, seconded by Rheaume that the Assembly adopt the following resolution: Whereas, The McMaster Students Union holds an anti-oppressive policy that was adopted in July of 2011; and Whereas, The policy states “As a student union, it is our duty to take note of these inequalities in power and hierarchies that exist within the McMaster community, as well as to take action in order to eradicate them”; and Whereas, The McMaster University Campus Store has sold costumes that are derogatory and racist towards Aboriginal people and other ethnic groups; therefore, be it Resolved, That as a result of the sales at McMaster Campus Store, the MSU will work with University partners to actively discourage the sale of offensive costumes and other items on our campus in the future.”
Rheaume explained that the original motion had specific and narrow resolutions that don’t allow working with the University. They decided to put forward the stance of working with the University moving forward.
Vote on Amendment Passes Unanimously Vote to Adopt Agenda Passes by General Consent ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM THE CHAIR
The Speaker announced that there is currently one SRA seat vacancy in the Engineering caucus. The Speaker announced that they will be opening seats for Awards Selections Committee this evening:
SRA 13I Page 2 November 3, 2013
An MSU Seat for the Rudy Heinzl Award of Excellence, presented for outstanding oneyear achievement that improves the lives of students at McMaster. An MSU and an SRA Seat for the MSU Merit Scholarship Award, presented of outstanding and valuable service to the university, student governments, clubs, societies, charities, or athletics. An MSU and an SRA Seat for the MSU Spirit Award, presented to the campus group that has demonstrated superior spirit. An MSU and an SRA Seat for the J. Lynn Watson Award for the Community, presented to a campus group for the greatest one-year contribution to charitable giving. An MSU and an SRA seat for the Honour M Award, presented for outstanding leadership, volunteering or special achievement in extra-curricular activities. The Speaker explained that the awards are a way in which the MSU recognizes and motivates outstanding students and groups within our community. The Speaker encouraged members to be a part of these selection committees, and to inform their constituents about the selection committees.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Wolwowicz that the Assembly adopt the minutes from SRA Meetings 13G – September 29, 2013 and 13H – October 20, 2013, as circulated. Passes Unanimously REPORT PERIOD 1.
Arts and Sciences Caucus – Pullen presented
2.
Pullen summarized the report. Business Caucus – Mallon presented
Mallon summarized the report.
Questions D’Angela asked if Mallon could explain why DCS said they wouldn’t allow them to be official observers. Mallon responded that they haven’t received a reason why yet, just that the answer was no. Doucet asked Mallon to clarify that DCS doesn’t allow students who have paid their fees to the DeGroote Commerce Society are not allowed to attend their meetings unless elected or hired. Mallon stated that was correct. 3.
Engineering Caucus – D’Mello presented
D’Mello stated that they have been going to MES meetings, and that they have presented the changes to BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS to get their feedback.
Questions Graham asked where the written report was. D’Mello responded that he forgot. 4.
Bylaws and Procedures Commissioner – Jeyasingham presented
5.
Jeyasingham summarized the report. Services Commissioner – Brodka presented
SRA 13I Page 3 November 3, 2013
Brodka summarized the report.
Questions Paul asked why EWB approached the Services Committee and not Finance. Brodka explained that in one of their proposals it identified a review process that involved the Services Committee. He stated that they looked it over and it doesn’t follow the mandate of the Services Committee. Brodka explained that EWB contact the Committee because they thought it was appropriate to do so. Graham stated that it might be worth referring them to the Finance Committee in the future, as it may be awkward to get the Services Committee involved in the process. Graham asked Brodka to share his thoughts on the First Year Mentoring Program. Brodka explained that it’s all about student retention, and that they have begun the process of contacting the faculty societies to gain some insight on it. 6.
Executive Board – Leslie presented
Leslie summarized the report.
Questions Harper asked what MOU was. A. D’Angela stated that it stood for Memorandum of Understanding. 7.
Vice-President (Education) – Graham presented
Graham summarized the report.
Questions Jeyasingham asked Graham to summarize the discussions held at OUSA GA. Graham went over the discussions held at OUSA and responded that three policies came forward: Comprehensive Access Strategy, Student Success, and Ancillary Fees. Abbas asked about the education submission. Graham responded that students want common themes supported with research. Gillis asked if he could elaborate on lobbying for tuition and youth employment opportunities. Graham responded that it depends on the political party. Speaking with the NDP the stance for tuition freezes is appreciated. Speaking to the Liberals there were a lot of discussion on youth employment. Gillis asked about the recommended policy on training TAs, and if he has engaged with them to see how they feel about it. Graham responded that he has spoken to various TAs and have heard different responses. He added that he spoke to CUPE as well. CUPE maintains that they would be in favour of any training as long as the TAs were getting paid for it. INFORMATION PERIOD
Campbell reported that they just arrived from OUSA GA. He thanked all of the delegates and stated that they were amazing. He reported that he will be meeting with the Public Works Committee tomorrow, and will provide an update with the HSR and see if they can support the MSU. An online chat was held with the President and Provost of McMaster, and himself. Campbell announced that this week is MAC Pride week. Doucet announced that he had received all of the information from Faculty Societies and University partners about spending during Welcome Week. He stated that he will present to the Assembly how the MSU, SSC, Res Life, OCRC, and Faculty Societies spent their money. He thanked Faculty Societies and Welcome Week planners for sending their information on time. Doucet reported that he had an opportunity to speak at the Engineering SAGM, and that he was really impressed with the amount of students who came out to the meeting. Klugsberg reported that most should have received an email earlier about TAC nominations. He asked the Assembly to please share this with their constituents.
SRA 13I Page 4 November 3, 2013
A. D’Angela thanked those from the Assembly and Faculty Societies who participated in Trick or Eat and Pumpkin Hike. She announced that the Pride March will be happening on Tuesday. D’Angela thanked Arts and Science, Nursing, Health Sciences, and Science for doing their Intro vlogs. Gillis reported that Hamilton just saw the closure of US Steel, and that this marked the end of an era.
QUESTION PERIOD
A. D’Angela asked Long to elaborate on how FYC elections went and how the Committee is progressing. Long responded that FYC is solid so far this year. The elections went well. D. D’Angela asked Doucet on what kind of communication was there about Welcome Week reporting. Doucet explained that he and A. D’Angela sit on the Welcome Week Advisory Committee and they are currently going through the process of reviewing expenditures and costs. Doucet explained that everyone in the MSU is trying to provide as much support as they can to Faculty Societies for Welcome Week reporting. Harper asked Doucet if he could elaborate if they have received a budget from IRC. Doucet stated that he did receive a draft budget from IRC late last week. Jeyasingham asked D. D’Angela to comment on the consultation process of BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS. D. D’Angela explained that he asked for a written proposal from each group, and three out of five submitted theirs on time. He told the Assembly that if they would like to get involved to just let him know. Harper asked Doucet to elaborate on the specifics of the IRC budget. Doucet responded that the IRC receives $150,000 in student fees and collects more money through other revenues. The largest percentage goes towards honorariums for exec members and IRC council members. IRC also puts out a clipboard for each first year student in residence, as well as put together a yearbook. Doucet stated that the rest goes towards conferences and programming. Pullen asked if the SRA still had live-streaming. Doucet explained that the MSU has been relying on a community member to do the live-streaming of SRA meetings, and isn’t able to loan out the equipment each time. Doucet stated that once he and the Executive Editor of The Silhouette finalize the new website they would be looking into costs of live-streaming equipment and software. Sparrow asked what the process was of establishing space on campus for the Women’s Centre, as the committee has been working on it for two years. A. D’Angela responded that the WTC Ad-Hoc Committee meets weekly, and that each week they are tasked with small projects. She is hoping to have more tangible items to come forward later on. Graham asked D. D’Angela if he could speak to the initial feedback of BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS. D. D’Angela responded that the groups submitted their own ideas to the Finance Committee and stated that he would be willing to send the recommendations out to everyone. Gillis asked D. D’Angela if he could make the documents available on the committee webpage, along with the reports and drafts of the bylaw. D. D’Angela explained that he doesn’t have any new drafts of the bylaw, but that he can certainly put the recommendations online. He added that all the meetings will be minuted. Rheaume asked Doucet if they would see the specific budgets for each overspent line in the audited statements from Welcome Week. Doucet explained that they aren’t audited statements, just statements from the Faculty Societies. He explained that in terms of overspending it means that each society gets a specific amount per student for Welcome Week and then it’s up to the society to spend it how they see fit. Gillis asked the Board of Directors to clarify on how the negotiations with the HSR are coming along and when the decision would be made. Campbell responded that their hope it to bring the referendum forward to the students as a preferential ballot to give the students options. He added that they are currently working the Elections Department to see if they could still bring forward a referendum at the first meeting of January, as the HSR hasn’t given the MSU the priority that they should have. Doucet added that they won’t be finalizing the formal agreement with the HSR until the referendum has happened so they know what direction the students want to take.
SRA 13I Page 5 November 3, 2013
Sparrow asked D. D’Angela if he could put up the research done on BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS on the Finance Committee’s webpage so that the groups could respond. D. D’Angela explained that there wasn’t any formal research but that he can show models of what the other schools have done. D. D’Angela asked what system was in place of who gets what in the Welcome Week levy. A. D’Angela responded that the breakdown was created two years ago when the fee was passed at General Assembly, and that the MSU receives $26 per student of the $110 levied, $11 p/s goes towards SWAG, $10 p/s goes to Faculty Societies, etc. She explained that the MOU document is in charge of where the money goes. Moore asked if they would look into the possibility of holding the HSR referendum with the SRA General Elections. Campbell responded that they should have enough time to have the referendum along with Presidential Elections, as having that deadline is helpful in negotiations.
BUSINESS 1.
Recess for Meetings of MSU Incorporated and CFMU Incorporated
Moved by Campbell, seconded by Abbas that the Assembly recess for meetings of MSU Incorporated and CFMU Incorporated. Passes by General Consent Recessed at 7:43 pm Called to Order at 8:33 pm CALL OF THE ROLL Present
Absent Excused Absent Late Others Present
Chair
2.
Brodka, Campbell, Candemir, A. D’Angela, D. D’Angela, Dicenzo, D’Mello, Doucet, Garasia, Gillis, Graham, Guarna, Harper, Jeyasingham, Leslie, Loewig, MacKinnon, Mallon, Morrow, Narro Perez, Palczewski, Paul, Pullen, Rheaume, Wolwowicz Tichenkov Abbas, Long, Sparrow Jacob Klugsberg (TAC Coordinator), Ana Qarri (Silhouette Staff reporter), Emily Brown (MSU Member), Dave Moore (MSUAA), Lindsey Craig (MSU Member), Teddy Saull (MSU Member), Victoria Scott (Recording Secretary) Maria Daniel
Close One (1) SRA/MSU Seat on Other Committees
Moved by Doucet, seconded by D’Mello that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) SRA/MSU seat on the Child Care Centre Advisory Committee.
Doucet encouraged the members to join the committee.
Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Pullen that the Assembly postpone Business Item #2 until SRA 13J
D’Angela explained that perhaps they could wait until the new SRA members have been elected, so that they have a chance to sit on a committee.
Nominations Leslie – self – accepted Vote to Postpone
SRA 13I Page 6 November 3, 2013
Passes Unanimously 3.
Close SRA Seat on Other Committee
Moved by Jeyasingham, seconded by Pullen that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) SRA seat on the Elections Committee.
Nominations Sparrow – self – accepted Vote on Motion In Favour: 26 Opposed: 0 Abstentions: 1 Abstained: Sparrow Motion Passes 4.
Sparrow won his seat on the Elections Committee by acclamation. Close MSU Seat to Other Committees
Moved by Daniel, seconded by Jeyasingham that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) MSU seat on the Elections Committee.
Moved by Morrow, seconded by Gillis to postpone Business Item #4 to SRA 13J.
D’Angela encouraged everyone to promote the MSU seat.
Vote to Postpone Passes by General Consent 5.
Close One (1) SRA Seat on Executive Board
Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Graham that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) SRA member on Executive Board.
D’Angela explained that Executive Board meets at 9 am on Thursdays this term.
Nominations Gillis – withdrew nomination Harper Vote on Motion In Favour: 26 Opposed: 0 Abstentions: 1 Abstained: Harper Motion Passes 6.
Harper won the seat on Executive Board by acclamation. Close MSU Seats on Ad-Hoc Committee for Democratic Reform
SRA 13I Page 7 November 3, 2013
Moved by Gillis, seconded by Graham to postpone Business Item #6 to SRA 13J
Graham asked everyone to please tell their constituents.
Nominations Pullen – Alexandra Sproule Vote to Postpone Passes Unanimously 7.
Open One (1) SRA Seat on Standing Committees
Moved by Jeyasingham, seconded by A. D’Angela that the Assembly open nominations for one (1) SRA seat on the Bylaws and Procedures Committee.
Jeyasingham announced that someone had to resign from the Committee. The meetings are at Friday at 11:30 am.
Vote on Motion Passes Unanimously 8.
Open MSU seats on Awards Committees
Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Brodka that the Assembly open nominations for MSU members to the following Awards Selection Committees: Honour M (1) Rudy Heinzl Award of Excellence (1) Merit Scholarship (1) J. Lynn Watson (1) Spirit Award (1)
A. D’Angela pointed out that if anyone would like to be nominated for these awards to not be on the committee, as it would be a conflict of interest. Sparrow asked if the MSU could purchase an ad in The Silhouette to encourage students to be a part of the committees. Doucet explained that they normally don’t put out an ad, but use the President’s Page to let students know. He stated that they tend to use social media and other channels.
Vote on Motion Passes Unanimously 9.
Open SRA Seats on Awards Committees
Moved by Jeyasingham, seconded by Campbell that the Assembly open nominations for SRA members to the following Awards Selection Committees: Honour M (1) Merit Scholarship (1) J. Lynn Watson (1) Spirit Award (1)
SRA 13I Page 8 November 3, 2013
Vote on Motion Passes by General Consent 10.
Clubs Ratification
Moved by Guarna, seconded by Rheaume that the Assembly ratify the Hamilton-McMaster Rotaract Club for the 2013/14 Academic Year.
Guarna stated that it looked good, and that if the Clubs Administrator is confident of the club put forward then the SRA should approve.
Vote on Motion In Favour: 27 Opposed: 0 Abstentions: 1 Abstained: Doucet Motion Passes 11.
McMaster University Campus Store
Moved by Sparrow, seconded by Rheaume that the Assembly adopt the following resolution: Whereas, The McMaster Students Union holds an anti-oppressive policy that was adopted in July of 2011; and Whereas, The policy states “As a student union, it is our duty to take note of these inequalities in power and hierarchies that exist within the McMaster community, as well as to take action in order to eradicate them”; and Whereas, The McMaster University Campus Store has sold costumes that are derogatory and racist towards Aboriginal people and other ethnic groups; therefore, be it Resolved, That as a result of the sales at McMaster Campus Store, the MSU will work with University partners to actively discourage the sale of offensive costumes and other items on our campus in the future.
Sparrow stated that a petition has been circulated and over 500 students have signed it. He explained that the costumes have been removed but they should be proactive that the MSU take a stance to address the concerns. He added that the re-wording of the original motion put forward instructs the MSU as a whole to make these stances. Sparrow explained that they should be engaging in education campaigns on campus, and that the anti-oppression policy states that there should be a campaign each year. He added that he understood that there will be talks about a retail policy in the future and is hoping that the MSU can be a positive force and addresses this. Rheaume read a statement from MFNSA. “Inappropriate Halloween costumes are not specific to McMaster, however we are concerned when such costumes appear within our own campus community. The issue of costumes at the McMaster Campus Store extends beyond the problematic representations of Indigenous peoples, and Indigenous women specifically, as there were other costumes that were also offensive to other groups and that condoned rape culture. The Indigenous Studies Program and Indigenous Services believes that there is more work to be done to build bridges and heighten the level of awareness on campus, as the issues facing Indigenous peoples in this country are complex and nuanced. The costume issue has been an embarrassment to the entire McMaster community, and hopefully these events can spark a dialogue on critical thought and informed decision making.” He agreed that the MSU should address this in some way and it’s too early to note what the affirmative action would be. It seems as though that the administration wasn’t aware of the costumes being brought in, and since it was based on a pilot project they didn’t look into it further. Rheaume added that the University did discuss with Doucet the possibility of bringing in a retail policy for items sold through McMaster and the MSU goes through sensitivity training. Graham asked Sparrow what he would like this to accomplish.
SRA 13I Page 9 November 3, 2013
Sparrow responded that the motion was vague for a reason. Sparrow explained that Doucet requested them to do so to maintain a positive relationship with the University and give some lateral room to maneuver with the University. Doucet explained that this was brought to their attention early on, and stated that he is supportive of a motion that words together towards a solution. Campbell thanked everyone involved. He thought it spoke to the positive intent of the motion being amended. He asked why Sparrow presented the motion this way, and not with the usual motion and supporting documentation. Sparrow felt that the resolution format worked best as it conveyed their emotions and had action items. Gillis agreed with holding an anti-oppression campaign, and stated that the Operations Committee is currently looking at it. He appreciated the spirit of the motion and felt it was the right step forward, but felt disheartened about the ignorant comments about it. Gillis felt as though the motion should have been stronger, as while it’s great that the University apologized but they still profited on the costumes sold. Rheaume explained that the MSU didn’t want to come out and look like they were finger pointing. It has been a week since this came to the attention of both the MSU and the University, and they thought it best for them to come to a resolution and work with the University before making specific requests.
Vote on Motion Passes Unanimously TIME OF NEXT MEETING November 17, 2013 6:30pm Council Chambers, GH 111 CALL OF THE ROLL Present
Absent Excused Absent Late Others Present
Chair
Abbas, Brodka, Campbell, Candemir, A. D’Angela, D. D’Angela, Dicenzo, D’Mello, Doucet, Garasia, Gillis, Graham, Guarna, Harper, Jeyasingham, Leslie, Loewig, Long, MacKinnon, Mallon, Morrow, Narro Perez, Palczewski, Paul, Pullen, Rheaume, Sparrow, Wolwowicz Tichenkov Jacob Klugsberg (TAC Coordinator), Ana Qarri (Silhouette Staff reporter), Emily Brown (MSU Member), Dave Moore (MSUAA), Lindsey Craig (MSU Member), Teddy Saull (MSU Member), Victoria Scott (Recording Secretary) Maria Daniel
ADJOURNMENT Moved by Morrow, seconded by Rheaume that the meeting adjourn. Motion Passes by General Consent Adjourned at 9:08 pm /vs
Called to Order at 6:31 pm CALL OF THE ROLL Present
Absent Excused Absent Late Others Present
Chair
Abbas, Brodka, Campbell, Candemir, A. D’Angela, D. D’Angela, Dicenzo, D’Mello, Doucet, Garasia, Gillis, Graham, Guarna, Harper, Jeyasingham, Leslie, Loewig, Long, MacKinnon, Mallon, Morrow, Narro Perez, Palczewski, Paul, Pullen, Rheaume, Sparrow, Wolwowicz Tichenkov Jacob Klugsberg (TAC Coordinator), Ana Qarri (Silhouette Staff reporter), Emily Brown (MSU Member), Dave Moore (MSUAA), Lindsey Craig (MSU Member), Teddy Saull (MSU Member), Victoria Scott (Recording Secretary) Maria Daniel
ADOPTION OF AGENDA Moved by Graham, seconded by Garasia that the agenda be adopted as amended. Amendment Moved by Rheaume, seconded by Sparrow to amend motion #11 to read: “Moved by Sparrow, seconded by Rheaume that the Assembly adopt the following resolution: Whereas, The McMaster Students Union holds an anti-oppressive policy that was adopted in July of 2011; and Whereas, The policy states “As a student union, it is our duty to take note of these inequalities in power and hierarchies that exist within the McMaster community, as well as to take action in order to eradicate them”; and Whereas, The McMaster University Campus Store has sold costumes that are derogatory and racist towards Aboriginal people and other ethnic groups; therefore, be it Resolved, That as a result of the sales at McMaster Campus Store, the MSU will work with University partners to actively discourage the sale of offensive costumes and other items on our campus in the future.”
Rheaume explained that the original motion had specific and narrow resolutions that don’t allow working with the University. They decided to put forward the stance of working with the University moving forward.
Vote on Amendment Passes Unanimously Vote to Adopt Agenda Passes by General Consent ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM THE CHAIR
The Speaker announced that there is currently one SRA seat vacancy in the Engineering caucus. The Speaker announced that they will be opening seats for Awards Selections Committee this evening:
SRA 13I Page 2 November 3, 2013
An MSU Seat for the Rudy Heinzl Award of Excellence, presented for outstanding oneyear achievement that improves the lives of students at McMaster. An MSU and an SRA Seat for the MSU Merit Scholarship Award, presented of outstanding and valuable service to the university, student governments, clubs, societies, charities, or athletics. An MSU and an SRA Seat for the MSU Spirit Award, presented to the campus group that has demonstrated superior spirit. An MSU and an SRA Seat for the J. Lynn Watson Award for the Community, presented to a campus group for the greatest one-year contribution to charitable giving. An MSU and an SRA seat for the Honour M Award, presented for outstanding leadership, volunteering or special achievement in extra-curricular activities. The Speaker explained that the awards are a way in which the MSU recognizes and motivates outstanding students and groups within our community. The Speaker encouraged members to be a part of these selection committees, and to inform their constituents about the selection committees.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Wolwowicz that the Assembly adopt the minutes from SRA Meetings 13G – September 29, 2013 and 13H – October 20, 2013, as circulated. Passes Unanimously REPORT PERIOD 1.
Arts and Sciences Caucus – Pullen presented
2.
Pullen summarized the report. Business Caucus – Mallon presented
Mallon summarized the report.
Questions D’Angela asked if Mallon could explain why DCS said they wouldn’t allow them to be official observers. Mallon responded that they haven’t received a reason why yet, just that the answer was no. Doucet asked Mallon to clarify that DCS doesn’t allow students who have paid their fees to the DeGroote Commerce Society are not allowed to attend their meetings unless elected or hired. Mallon stated that was correct. 3.
Engineering Caucus – D’Mello presented
D’Mello stated that they have been going to MES meetings, and that they have presented the changes to BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS to get their feedback.
Questions Graham asked where the written report was. D’Mello responded that he forgot. 4.
Bylaws and Procedures Commissioner – Jeyasingham presented
5.
Jeyasingham summarized the report. Services Commissioner – Brodka presented
SRA 13I Page 3 November 3, 2013
Brodka summarized the report.
Questions Paul asked why EWB approached the Services Committee and not Finance. Brodka explained that in one of their proposals it identified a review process that involved the Services Committee. He stated that they looked it over and it doesn’t follow the mandate of the Services Committee. Brodka explained that EWB contact the Committee because they thought it was appropriate to do so. Graham stated that it might be worth referring them to the Finance Committee in the future, as it may be awkward to get the Services Committee involved in the process. Graham asked Brodka to share his thoughts on the First Year Mentoring Program. Brodka explained that it’s all about student retention, and that they have begun the process of contacting the faculty societies to gain some insight on it. 6.
Executive Board – Leslie presented
Leslie summarized the report.
Questions Harper asked what MOU was. A. D’Angela stated that it stood for Memorandum of Understanding. 7.
Vice-President (Education) – Graham presented
Graham summarized the report.
Questions Jeyasingham asked Graham to summarize the discussions held at OUSA GA. Graham went over the discussions held at OUSA and responded that three policies came forward: Comprehensive Access Strategy, Student Success, and Ancillary Fees. Abbas asked about the education submission. Graham responded that students want common themes supported with research. Gillis asked if he could elaborate on lobbying for tuition and youth employment opportunities. Graham responded that it depends on the political party. Speaking with the NDP the stance for tuition freezes is appreciated. Speaking to the Liberals there were a lot of discussion on youth employment. Gillis asked about the recommended policy on training TAs, and if he has engaged with them to see how they feel about it. Graham responded that he has spoken to various TAs and have heard different responses. He added that he spoke to CUPE as well. CUPE maintains that they would be in favour of any training as long as the TAs were getting paid for it. INFORMATION PERIOD
Campbell reported that they just arrived from OUSA GA. He thanked all of the delegates and stated that they were amazing. He reported that he will be meeting with the Public Works Committee tomorrow, and will provide an update with the HSR and see if they can support the MSU. An online chat was held with the President and Provost of McMaster, and himself. Campbell announced that this week is MAC Pride week. Doucet announced that he had received all of the information from Faculty Societies and University partners about spending during Welcome Week. He stated that he will present to the Assembly how the MSU, SSC, Res Life, OCRC, and Faculty Societies spent their money. He thanked Faculty Societies and Welcome Week planners for sending their information on time. Doucet reported that he had an opportunity to speak at the Engineering SAGM, and that he was really impressed with the amount of students who came out to the meeting. Klugsberg reported that most should have received an email earlier about TAC nominations. He asked the Assembly to please share this with their constituents.
SRA 13I Page 4 November 3, 2013
A. D’Angela thanked those from the Assembly and Faculty Societies who participated in Trick or Eat and Pumpkin Hike. She announced that the Pride March will be happening on Tuesday. D’Angela thanked Arts and Science, Nursing, Health Sciences, and Science for doing their Intro vlogs. Gillis reported that Hamilton just saw the closure of US Steel, and that this marked the end of an era.
QUESTION PERIOD
A. D’Angela asked Long to elaborate on how FYC elections went and how the Committee is progressing. Long responded that FYC is solid so far this year. The elections went well. D. D’Angela asked Doucet on what kind of communication was there about Welcome Week reporting. Doucet explained that he and A. D’Angela sit on the Welcome Week Advisory Committee and they are currently going through the process of reviewing expenditures and costs. Doucet explained that everyone in the MSU is trying to provide as much support as they can to Faculty Societies for Welcome Week reporting. Harper asked Doucet if he could elaborate if they have received a budget from IRC. Doucet stated that he did receive a draft budget from IRC late last week. Jeyasingham asked D. D’Angela to comment on the consultation process of BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS. D. D’Angela explained that he asked for a written proposal from each group, and three out of five submitted theirs on time. He told the Assembly that if they would like to get involved to just let him know. Harper asked Doucet to elaborate on the specifics of the IRC budget. Doucet responded that the IRC receives $150,000 in student fees and collects more money through other revenues. The largest percentage goes towards honorariums for exec members and IRC council members. IRC also puts out a clipboard for each first year student in residence, as well as put together a yearbook. Doucet stated that the rest goes towards conferences and programming. Pullen asked if the SRA still had live-streaming. Doucet explained that the MSU has been relying on a community member to do the live-streaming of SRA meetings, and isn’t able to loan out the equipment each time. Doucet stated that once he and the Executive Editor of The Silhouette finalize the new website they would be looking into costs of live-streaming equipment and software. Sparrow asked what the process was of establishing space on campus for the Women’s Centre, as the committee has been working on it for two years. A. D’Angela responded that the WTC Ad-Hoc Committee meets weekly, and that each week they are tasked with small projects. She is hoping to have more tangible items to come forward later on. Graham asked D. D’Angela if he could speak to the initial feedback of BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS. D. D’Angela responded that the groups submitted their own ideas to the Finance Committee and stated that he would be willing to send the recommendations out to everyone. Gillis asked D. D’Angela if he could make the documents available on the committee webpage, along with the reports and drafts of the bylaw. D. D’Angela explained that he doesn’t have any new drafts of the bylaw, but that he can certainly put the recommendations online. He added that all the meetings will be minuted. Rheaume asked Doucet if they would see the specific budgets for each overspent line in the audited statements from Welcome Week. Doucet explained that they aren’t audited statements, just statements from the Faculty Societies. He explained that in terms of overspending it means that each society gets a specific amount per student for Welcome Week and then it’s up to the society to spend it how they see fit. Gillis asked the Board of Directors to clarify on how the negotiations with the HSR are coming along and when the decision would be made. Campbell responded that their hope it to bring the referendum forward to the students as a preferential ballot to give the students options. He added that they are currently working the Elections Department to see if they could still bring forward a referendum at the first meeting of January, as the HSR hasn’t given the MSU the priority that they should have. Doucet added that they won’t be finalizing the formal agreement with the HSR until the referendum has happened so they know what direction the students want to take.
SRA 13I Page 5 November 3, 2013
Sparrow asked D. D’Angela if he could put up the research done on BYLAW 5 – FINANCIAL AFFAIRS on the Finance Committee’s webpage so that the groups could respond. D. D’Angela explained that there wasn’t any formal research but that he can show models of what the other schools have done. D. D’Angela asked what system was in place of who gets what in the Welcome Week levy. A. D’Angela responded that the breakdown was created two years ago when the fee was passed at General Assembly, and that the MSU receives $26 per student of the $110 levied, $11 p/s goes towards SWAG, $10 p/s goes to Faculty Societies, etc. She explained that the MOU document is in charge of where the money goes. Moore asked if they would look into the possibility of holding the HSR referendum with the SRA General Elections. Campbell responded that they should have enough time to have the referendum along with Presidential Elections, as having that deadline is helpful in negotiations.
BUSINESS 1.
Recess for Meetings of MSU Incorporated and CFMU Incorporated
Moved by Campbell, seconded by Abbas that the Assembly recess for meetings of MSU Incorporated and CFMU Incorporated. Passes by General Consent Recessed at 7:43 pm Called to Order at 8:33 pm CALL OF THE ROLL Present
Absent Excused Absent Late Others Present
Chair
2.
Brodka, Campbell, Candemir, A. D’Angela, D. D’Angela, Dicenzo, D’Mello, Doucet, Garasia, Gillis, Graham, Guarna, Harper, Jeyasingham, Leslie, Loewig, MacKinnon, Mallon, Morrow, Narro Perez, Palczewski, Paul, Pullen, Rheaume, Wolwowicz Tichenkov Abbas, Long, Sparrow Jacob Klugsberg (TAC Coordinator), Ana Qarri (Silhouette Staff reporter), Emily Brown (MSU Member), Dave Moore (MSUAA), Lindsey Craig (MSU Member), Teddy Saull (MSU Member), Victoria Scott (Recording Secretary) Maria Daniel
Close One (1) SRA/MSU Seat on Other Committees
Moved by Doucet, seconded by D’Mello that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) SRA/MSU seat on the Child Care Centre Advisory Committee.
Doucet encouraged the members to join the committee.
Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Pullen that the Assembly postpone Business Item #2 until SRA 13J
D’Angela explained that perhaps they could wait until the new SRA members have been elected, so that they have a chance to sit on a committee.
Nominations Leslie – self – accepted Vote to Postpone
SRA 13I Page 6 November 3, 2013
Passes Unanimously 3.
Close SRA Seat on Other Committee
Moved by Jeyasingham, seconded by Pullen that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) SRA seat on the Elections Committee.
Nominations Sparrow – self – accepted Vote on Motion In Favour: 26 Opposed: 0 Abstentions: 1 Abstained: Sparrow Motion Passes 4.
Sparrow won his seat on the Elections Committee by acclamation. Close MSU Seat to Other Committees
Moved by Daniel, seconded by Jeyasingham that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) MSU seat on the Elections Committee.
Moved by Morrow, seconded by Gillis to postpone Business Item #4 to SRA 13J.
D’Angela encouraged everyone to promote the MSU seat.
Vote to Postpone Passes by General Consent 5.
Close One (1) SRA Seat on Executive Board
Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Graham that the Assembly close nominations for one (1) SRA member on Executive Board.
D’Angela explained that Executive Board meets at 9 am on Thursdays this term.
Nominations Gillis – withdrew nomination Harper Vote on Motion In Favour: 26 Opposed: 0 Abstentions: 1 Abstained: Harper Motion Passes 6.
Harper won the seat on Executive Board by acclamation. Close MSU Seats on Ad-Hoc Committee for Democratic Reform
SRA 13I Page 7 November 3, 2013
Moved by Gillis, seconded by Graham to postpone Business Item #6 to SRA 13J
Graham asked everyone to please tell their constituents.
Nominations Pullen – Alexandra Sproule Vote to Postpone Passes Unanimously 7.
Open One (1) SRA Seat on Standing Committees
Moved by Jeyasingham, seconded by A. D’Angela that the Assembly open nominations for one (1) SRA seat on the Bylaws and Procedures Committee.
Jeyasingham announced that someone had to resign from the Committee. The meetings are at Friday at 11:30 am.
Vote on Motion Passes Unanimously 8.
Open MSU seats on Awards Committees
Moved by A. D’Angela, seconded by Brodka that the Assembly open nominations for MSU members to the following Awards Selection Committees: Honour M (1) Rudy Heinzl Award of Excellence (1) Merit Scholarship (1) J. Lynn Watson (1) Spirit Award (1)
A. D’Angela pointed out that if anyone would like to be nominated for these awards to not be on the committee, as it would be a conflict of interest. Sparrow asked if the MSU could purchase an ad in The Silhouette to encourage students to be a part of the committees. Doucet explained that they normally don’t put out an ad, but use the President’s Page to let students know. He stated that they tend to use social media and other channels.
Vote on Motion Passes Unanimously 9.
Open SRA Seats on Awards Committees
Moved by Jeyasingham, seconded by Campbell that the Assembly open nominations for SRA members to the following Awards Selection Committees: Honour M (1) Merit Scholarship (1) J. Lynn Watson (1) Spirit Award (1)
SRA 13I Page 8 November 3, 2013
Vote on Motion Passes by General Consent 10.
Clubs Ratification
Moved by Guarna, seconded by Rheaume that the Assembly ratify the Hamilton-McMaster Rotaract Club for the 2013/14 Academic Year.
Guarna stated that it looked good, and that if the Clubs Administrator is confident of the club put forward then the SRA should approve.
Vote on Motion In Favour: 27 Opposed: 0 Abstentions: 1 Abstained: Doucet Motion Passes 11.
McMaster University Campus Store
Moved by Sparrow, seconded by Rheaume that the Assembly adopt the following resolution: Whereas, The McMaster Students Union holds an anti-oppressive policy that was adopted in July of 2011; and Whereas, The policy states “As a student union, it is our duty to take note of these inequalities in power and hierarchies that exist within the McMaster community, as well as to take action in order to eradicate them”; and Whereas, The McMaster University Campus Store has sold costumes that are derogatory and racist towards Aboriginal people and other ethnic groups; therefore, be it Resolved, That as a result of the sales at McMaster Campus Store, the MSU will work with University partners to actively discourage the sale of offensive costumes and other items on our campus in the future.
Sparrow stated that a petition has been circulated and over 500 students have signed it. He explained that the costumes have been removed but they should be proactive that the MSU take a stance to address the concerns. He added that the re-wording of the original motion put forward instructs the MSU as a whole to make these stances. Sparrow explained that they should be engaging in education campaigns on campus, and that the anti-oppression policy states that there should be a campaign each year. He added that he understood that there will be talks about a retail policy in the future and is hoping that the MSU can be a positive force and addresses this. Rheaume read a statement from MFNSA. “Inappropriate Halloween costumes are not specific to McMaster, however we are concerned when such costumes appear within our own campus community. The issue of costumes at the McMaster Campus Store extends beyond the problematic representations of Indigenous peoples, and Indigenous women specifically, as there were other costumes that were also offensive to other groups and that condoned rape culture. The Indigenous Studies Program and Indigenous Services believes that there is more work to be done to build bridges and heighten the level of awareness on campus, as the issues facing Indigenous peoples in this country are complex and nuanced. The costume issue has been an embarrassment to the entire McMaster community, and hopefully these events can spark a dialogue on critical thought and informed decision making.” He agreed that the MSU should address this in some way and it’s too early to note what the affirmative action would be. It seems as though that the administration wasn’t aware of the costumes being brought in, and since it was based on a pilot project they didn’t look into it further. Rheaume added that the University did discuss with Doucet the possibility of bringing in a retail policy for items sold through McMaster and the MSU goes through sensitivity training. Graham asked Sparrow what he would like this to accomplish.
SRA 13I Page 9 November 3, 2013
Sparrow responded that the motion was vague for a reason. Sparrow explained that Doucet requested them to do so to maintain a positive relationship with the University and give some lateral room to maneuver with the University. Doucet explained that this was brought to their attention early on, and stated that he is supportive of a motion that words together towards a solution. Campbell thanked everyone involved. He thought it spoke to the positive intent of the motion being amended. He asked why Sparrow presented the motion this way, and not with the usual motion and supporting documentation. Sparrow felt that the resolution format worked best as it conveyed their emotions and had action items. Gillis agreed with holding an anti-oppression campaign, and stated that the Operations Committee is currently looking at it. He appreciated the spirit of the motion and felt it was the right step forward, but felt disheartened about the ignorant comments about it. Gillis felt as though the motion should have been stronger, as while it’s great that the University apologized but they still profited on the costumes sold. Rheaume explained that the MSU didn’t want to come out and look like they were finger pointing. It has been a week since this came to the attention of both the MSU and the University, and they thought it best for them to come to a resolution and work with the University before making specific requests.
Vote on Motion Passes Unanimously TIME OF NEXT MEETING November 17, 2013 6:30pm Council Chambers, GH 111 CALL OF THE ROLL Present
Absent Excused Absent Late Others Present
Chair
Abbas, Brodka, Campbell, Candemir, A. D’Angela, D. D’Angela, Dicenzo, D’Mello, Doucet, Garasia, Gillis, Graham, Guarna, Harper, Jeyasingham, Leslie, Loewig, Long, MacKinnon, Mallon, Morrow, Narro Perez, Palczewski, Paul, Pullen, Rheaume, Sparrow, Wolwowicz Tichenkov Jacob Klugsberg (TAC Coordinator), Ana Qarri (Silhouette Staff reporter), Emily Brown (MSU Member), Dave Moore (MSUAA), Lindsey Craig (MSU Member), Teddy Saull (MSU Member), Victoria Scott (Recording Secretary) Maria Daniel
ADJOURNMENT Moved by Morrow, seconded by Rheaume that the meeting adjourn. Motion Passes by General Consent Adjourned at 9:08 pm /vs
