Tues. S4-W2 (2)

Report 6 Downloads 98 Views
8/2/16

Examples of Typical Disposition Codes •  •  •  •  • 

Other Candidate Selected Not Best Fit Not Suitable Other Blank

Strategic Disposition Codes •  Candidate declined offer •  Did not consider – Data management technique •  Does not meet basic qualifications •  Could not contact to schedule 1st interview •  Did not return calls •  Offer rescinded – Did not pass background check

Disposition Code Entry Best Practices •  Timeliness –  Disposition in real time –  Set up system so must disposition before closing requisition or generating offer letter

•  Do not use “dump codes” –  Better candidate selected –  Not considered in middle of requisition

•  Audit use of disposition codes in requisitions –  Evaluate recruiters on effective use

The Other Side of the Equation: Hire Data •  Look at your hire data – are they truly New Hires? –  –  –  – 

Rehires Union Recalls “Transfers” Conversions

•  Note: Often “moves the needle” more than applicant data refinements

The Power of the Internet Applicant Rule – How to Strategically Refine Applicant Data Rate for Females

Rate for Males

Standard Deviation

Shortfall

Unrefined – All Candidates

20/1000 .02

40/1000 .04

2.622

10

Minus Never MinusConsidered Never Considered

20/800 20/800 .03 .03

40/900 40/900 .04.04

And Minus Does Not Meet Basic Qualifications

20/725 .03

40/850 .05

2.012

7

And Minus Withdrew

20/675 .03

40/825 .05

1.854

7

Analysis

2.169

2.169

8

8

OFCCP’s “New” Tool •  Requests for Expression of Interest –  Candidates who do not meet the definition of an applicant

•  What are Contractors’ recordkeeping obligations? –  Data? –  Documents?

5

8/2/16

How Should Employers Respond to OFCCP Requests for “Expressions of Interest?” • 

Think about/find out why they are asking –  FCCM checkbox for IAR –  Adverse Impact –  Inexorable zeroes/underutilization/steering

• 

Respond accordingly –  If always ask/checking off a box, narrative –  If adverse impact, address –  If inexorable zeroes/underutilization/steering, recruitment for affected groups

•  • 

OFCCP needs to articulate a reason for additional candidate data If going to provide, analyze first! –  Know what OFCCP is going to see once they start looking so you can be prepared to respond

OFCCP is Going Deeper and Wider in Audits •  •  •  • 

Two years of applicant data All expressions of interest What is your definition of internet applicant Need to verify it was applied properly –  They want to check your work –  And if they don’t think it was done correctly they will add candidates back into the analyses

Be Aware of 1:1 Ratios • 

What is a 1:1 Ratio –  One applicant for one hire

Effective Outreach for OFCCP Audits • 

Address proactively through the data pre-submission –  Ensure the job group is not 1:1 –  Gather additional applicant data (staffing agencies, interviewers, other sources) –  Was this really a “New Hire” (think Rehire, Conversion, etc.)

• 

Crafting your response: This is not a violation if: –  Posted with state, if appropriate –  Posted with M/F/D sources if “goals” AND –  No one else applied

New Obligations under the New Regulations Many new obligations, but the big changes are: •  For the first time, data collection –  Must solicit veteran and disability status of applicants –  Must solicit disability status of employees

•  Disability placement goals (7%) •  Veteran hiring benchmarks (6.9%) •  Must assess the effectiveness of outreach efforts

Data Collection and Analysis •  Must collect and maintain: –  –  –  –  – 

Number of total applicants who self-ID as disabled and/or veteran Total number of job openings and number of jobs filled Total number of applicants for all jobs Total number of disabled and veterans hired Total number of applicants hired

•  Must maintain records of “computations or comparisons pertaining to applicants and hires” •  Must retain data (and any analysis) for 3 years

6

8/2/16

New Data Obligations for Vets and the Disabled •  Items 7 (Sec 503) and 11(VEVRAA) on the Itemized Listing: –  “Results of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the outreach and recruitment efforts” for the disabled and covered veterans

•  Common requests: –  Provide a description of all outreach activities your company participated in during the plan year –  Provide documentation of outreach activities to veterans & disabled individuals (and women & minorities) –  Provide the name and contact information for the organizations contacted

How to Monitor Effectiveness •  Consider asking multiple times and track it –  Referral source drop down in ATS on application – first touch –  Phone screens “How did you hear about us?” – second touch –  New Hire orientation paperwork – third touch

•  Identify which sources are working and not working •  Good rule of thumb pre-submission - add 3 & take away 3

What is Effective? •  Its not just about “push out,” but the “pull in” •  Three veteran organizations example: –  Vets Emporium: No vets referred. –  Vets R Us: Lots of vets referred: none hired. –  GetVets: Vets referred and hired.

•  Which one is the most effective? •  Which one is the most dangerous?

Take Aways •  OFCCP has said “failure to meet goals/benchmarks is not a violation; failure to try is.” •  Show OFCCP you are trying: –  Generally say what worked well –  Note areas where continue to work with source(s) –  Describe areas where changes were made/different source(s) added

•  Try to focus OFCCP on areas where goals exist •  Get reports/data to use, if necessary

PepsiCo Performance with Purpose

7

8/2/16

Better Together Outreach Process •  •  •  •  •  •  •  • 

Based on Lean 6 Sigma Process Design 11 Week Critical Path Directly Tied to AAP & Progress to Goals Defines Fundamental Local Market Requirements for Success Insure Local Market Challenges & Opportunities are Addressed Sustainable/Documented CBO Relationships Less Work Due to Shared Effort among Divisions Confidence in Defendable Outreach for All PepsiCo Divisions in a given market in One, Unified Effort

Sign In Table: •  Greet Attendees •  Provide CBO Binder & Name tags •  Creating Documentation & Evidence of Activity •  Sign in Sheet •  Collect Business Cards Opening Remarks: Michael Poole (PBC) & Jason Westenskow (FL)

Each Division Presented: 1.  Division Specific Selection Process & Criteria 2.  High Volume Opportunity Position •  • 

Job Description Basic Qualifications

3.  Online Candidate Experience 4.  Division Process Q&A Melissa Bimbi Frito Lay, Zone Business Manager

#5 PBC Warehouser

#2 PBC D-Bay Driver RegistraDon PaF Orzel

#1 Jim Kuchar & PBC Merch

#3 Frito Lay RSR

#4 Trop RSR

Jeff Brozovic = 2-3-4-5 Jim Kuchar = 3-4-5-2 Kevin Woods = 4-5-2-3 Adriana/Erin = 51st Street Tour

8

Recommend Documents