UK Energy Research Centre

Report 4 Downloads 95 Views
Future energy technologies and philosophies for UK and Europe

John Loughhead FREng Executive Director UK Energy Research Centre 32nd ATSE National Symposium, Brisbane, Australia 16 November 2009

UK energy sources 1995

2005

Total: 218.4

Total: 234.3

mtoe

9.7

1.7

22.4

0.8

mtoe

17.1

7.8

31.7 39.9

34.5

%

Coal Petrol Gas Nuc lear Hydroelec tric ity Imports

Source: DUKES Statistics

Renewables and waste

33

%

Sectoral emissions under business as usual

Source: UKERC Energy 2050 Report, May 2009

The Scale of the Challenge: Climate Change Mitigation  The UK Government has committed to  A 34% reduction in GHG emissions by 2020 (110 MTCO2e cf 1990)  an aspiration of an 80% reduction in GHG emissions by 2050

4

UK CO2 emissions under different scenarios

Source: UKERC Energy 2050 Report, May 2009

Sectoral emissions for 2000, 2035, 2050

Source: UKERC Energy 2050 Report, May 2009

-40% -60% -80%

-90%

Final energy demand by fuel 2035 & 2050

Source: UKERC Energy 2050 Report, May 2009

-40% -60% -80%

-90%

Electricity generation mix 2035 & 2050

Source: UKERC Energy 2050 Report, May 2009

-40% -60% -80%

-90%

We have a plan!

European Roadmap By 2020: 20% electricity from wind 15% electricity from solar PV Grid can seamlessly integrate 35% stochastic renewables 14% EU energy from sustainable bio-energy sources CCS on verge of commercial viability (assuming functioning carbon market First GEN IV nuclear fission prototype ready

Planned European R&D Investments 2010 - 2020: Technology Solar PV & CSP

Investment €16Bn

Target 15% electricity

CCS

€13Bn

Almost commercial

Energy Efficiency

€11Bn

25 smart cities

Fuel cells & Hydrogen

€6Bn

Commercial

Electricity networks

€2Bn

50% smart

Source: McKinsey and Company “Assessing the cost of CCS”

CCS: Oxyfuel technology status

Source: EU ZEP Analysis

CCS: Post-combustion capture status

Source: EU ZEP Analysis

CCS: Pre-combustion technology status

Source: EU ZEP Analysis

CCS: Demo project requirements

Source: EU ZEP Analysis

UK CCS  UK Government will support a postcombustion capture full-scale (c.300MW) demonstrator  Bids have been invited  Contribution not defined, but expected around £250M  Decision during 2009 for operation 2012  3 further CCS systems, funded by customer charges  No new coal plant without CCS readiness and minimum 300MW initial capacity

Wind  On-shore wind turbines are now a commercial technology, albeit supported by market intervention. $4000/kW; load factor reduce costs of solar cells cf module costs of $3/W today  Materials 2nd and 3rd Generation: silicon, cadmium telluride and copper indium di-selenide  Main research themes  Light trapping.  Extending the absorbing power of silicon.  Reducing the losses in solar cells.  Making materials efficient device structures  Improving process technology

Large area thin film PV array at St Asaph, North Wales.

Marine- Tidal energy R&D  Tidal energy has specific UK potential

 Marine

 Mw-scale demonstrators in test at present  Far from economically viable today  Increase understanding of the nature and optimum recovery methods for tidal stream energy  Offshore energy conversion and power conditioning  Deployment post-2015

Marine – wave energy .  First UK deployment target is 2GW.  Major challenges of reliability and cost  Devices are unreliable and fragile at present  Still at R&D stage with concept trials  Deployment uncertain, but after 2020.

Bioenergy – R&D focus  Land-use competition with food crops and overall sustainability is major issue  R&D biotechnology:  Ensuring sustainability  Widening the range of starting materials for bioenergy  Making plant cell walls easier to break down  Optimising fermentation to produce fuel

 R&D bioenergy:    

Resources Biomass characterisation Thermal conversion Biofuels and biorefineries

Importance of heat CO2 Em issions from UK Energy End-User Consum ption

160 140 120

42

mtCO2

100 80

32

60 95

144

32

40 61 20

37

0 Residential

Service

CO2 emissions from heating (mtCO2)

Manufacturing

Transport

Non-heat CO2 emissions (mtCO2)

UK industrial energy use by quality Energy (PJ) 200 180 Pulp and Paper

160

Gypsum

140

Other Lime

120

Iron and Steel 100

Glass Food and Drink

80

Chemicals 60

Ceramics Cement

40

Aluminium

20 0

0.27

0.65

0.79 0.85 0.87 0.95 1.00

Thermodynamic quality

Source: Geoff Hammond, UKERC and Bath University

Heat

UK industrial energy saving potential % 100 Economic potential

80 60

Technical potential

Existing energy use

Thermodynamic potential

40 20 0 Energy saving potential

Heat Source: Geoff Hammond, UKERC and Bath University

The Scale of the Challenge: Contribution of the Built Environment  45% of all present carbon emissions come from existing buildings, with 27% from homes  87% of existing buildings will still be here in 2050

26

Market penetration trends, home energy efficiency measures

Source: Prof Dennis Loveday, Loughborough University

Progress towards 80%...energy efficiency predictions: 2001 English housing stock 0% reduction 20%

100

Existing 2001 English housing stock (123 MTCO2) +100% solid wall insulation

80

Heating CO2 emissions (MTCO2)

40% +100% cavity wall insulation +100% low energy lights

60 60%

APPLIANCE INTERVENTIONS

40

+100% low standby power appliances

80%

+100% gas boilers as condensing +100% triple glazing +100% 0.5 ach ventilation rate +100% 300mm loft insulation +100% water heating interventions +100% low energy cold appliances

HEATING INTERVENTIONS

20

0 0

10

20

30

40

Appliance (cooking, lights and appliances) CO2 emissions (MTCO2) -Based on 1971 to 2000 average climate data. Source: CaRB project, Carbon Vision Partnership, funded by EPSRC Source: Prof Dennis Loveday, Loughborough University

Recent progress: Hard data from recent times projected forward 1990#:

154MtCO2 equivalent from housing



35% of energy saving interventions installed*

2005#:

147MtCO2 equivalent from housing



65% of energy saving interventions installed*

2020

114MtCO2, HMG’s target for housing

Must achieve net savings at six times rate of recent history. 4% savings net of many factors At most a 20% further reductions via 100% reach of * above. # Measured data, incontrovertible * 3” loft insulation, >60% window double glazed, >60% rooms draught proofed, cavity wall insulation to modern standards 29 Source: Prof Mike Kelly, CLG

Housing

MicroCHP: Fuel cell base 10 000 unit trial by 2010 36 000 for 2012

SOFC technologies

Ceres Power Rolls Royce FCS

Heat Pumps  Can provide space / water heating, and space cooling  Upgrades ‘low grade’ environmental heat  Ground and air source  Typical COPs in range 3-5  Best with lower temp. / large area emitters  Retrofit –some challenges (emitter and garden areas)  Consumer barriers: unfamiliarity, maintenance availability, noise

Carbon intensity of heating Current grid carbon intensity

Carbon per useful heat

0.14

useful heat intensity (kgC/kWh

0.12

Direct electric

0.1 CHP

0.08 0.06

Heat pump

0.04 0.02

grid intensity (kgC/kWh)

18 0.

16 0.

14 0.

12 0.

1 0.

08 0.

06 0.

04 0.

02

-0.02

0.

0

0

Current grid status

Source: Dr Nick Eyre, OUCE Oxford and UKERC

Gas-fired boiler

Nuclear planning

Transport: Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, Batteries, or Bikes

 t

To close  Carbon reduction targets are challenging  Technologies to address these are identified, but most require substantial development  Wind is the primary “new” energy source for Northern Europe  CCS may play only an interim role  Primary need is for engineering development, not science  Solar technologies do need new science

UK Energy Research Centre www.ukerc.ac.uk

Recommend Documents