U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety & Health Administration
www.osha.gov
Advanced Search | A-Z Index
Search
Search Results
Inspection Detail
[Find It! in DOL]
Inspection: 110528551 - Environmental Chemical Corporation Inspection Information - Office: San Francisco Nr: 110528551
Report ID:0935000
Open Date: 02/23/2002
Environmental Chemical Corporation Tanapag Pcb Project, Tanapag Saipan, MP 96950 SIC: 8744/Facilities Support Management Services Mailing: 1240 Bayshore Highway, Burlingame, CA 94010 Inspection Type: Unprog Rel Scope: Partial Ownership: Private Safety/Health: Safety Planning Guide: Safety-Manufacturing Optional Information: Type ID N 1 N 10
Union Status: NonUnion
Advanced Notice: N Close Conference: 03/10/2002 Close Case: 09/16/2002
Value 110528544 IMMLANG-Y
Related Activity: Type ID Safety Health Inspection 110528544 Violation Summary Serious Willful Repeat Other Unclass Total Initial Violations
2
2
Current Violations
2
2
Initial Penalty
9000
9000
Current Penalty
9000
9000
FTA Amount
Violation Items #
ID
Type
Standard
1. 01001 Serious 5A0001
Issuance
Abate
Curr$ Init$ Fta$ Contest
LastEvent
07/25/2002 08/08/2002 $4500 $4500
$0
I - Informal Settlement
2. 01002 Serious 19100132 A 07/25/2002 08/02/2002 $4500 $4500
$0
I - Informal Settlement
Back to Top
www.osha.gov
www.dol.gov
Contact Us | Freedom of Information Act | Customer Survey Privacy and Security Statement | Disclaimers Occupational Safety & Health Administration 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard: DUST&FUMES Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were accidentally exposed to the hazard of fine dust at high temperatures: a) The ECC Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) which described the full safety precautions to be followed before workers were allowed to open the ESP hatch on the Indirect Thermal Desorption (ITD) precipitator was inadequate in that: The SOP did not address or require the use of the air lance prior to opening the precipitator hatch to ensure that there had not been clogging and/or backup of dust in the precipitator. The SOP did not require visual observation at the soil conditioner interface opening to determine if concentration or backup of dust remained in the precipitator. One feasible and acceptable abatement method, among others, to correct this hazard is: Develop a comprehensive SOP that fully describes safety precautions to be followed before opening the ESP hatch including but not limited to: 1.a requirement to operate the air lance before opening the ESP hatch; 2.a requirement that employees use visual observation prior to hatch opening to ensure that there is no residual concentration of dust in the precipitator;
Back to Top
www.osha.gov
www.dol.gov
Contact Us | Freedom of Information Act | Customer Survey Privacy and Security Statement | Disclaimers Occupational Safety & Health Administration 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210
Contact Us | Freedom of Information Act | Customer Survey Privacy and Security Statement | Disclaimers Occupational Safety & Health Administration 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210