Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Project Monitoring Report ...
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Project Monitoring Report: Year 03
Davidson County, North Carolina Upper Yadkin River Basin Cataloging Unit 030401030 EEP Project ID #407
Prepared for: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program 217 West Jones St, Suite 3000A Raleigh, NC 27603
Monitoring Firm:
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220 Raleigh, NC 27609 (919) 783-9214 Project Manager: Adam Spiller Email: [email protected] Project No: 16133830 January 2014
Design Firm: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 33068 Raleigh, NC 27636 (704) 333-5131
CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Monitoring Results................................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 References .............................................................................................................................................................. 3
Appendices Appendix A – Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables.................................................................................... 4
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2. Mitigation Planview .................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 1. Project Components .................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ......................................................................................................... 8 Table 3. Project Contacts ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 4. Project Attribute Table ............................................................................................................................... 10 Appendix B – Visual Assesment Data ...................................................................................................................... 11
CCPV ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assesment ........................................................................................ 18 Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assesment ............................................................................................................... 24 Stream and Wetland Photos .................................................................................................................................... 25 Stream Problem Area Photos .................................................................................................................................. 32 Vegetation Plot Photos ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Appendix C – Vegetation Plot Data .......................................................................................................................... 36
Table 7. Vegetation Plots Woody Stem Success Criteria Attainment Table ............................................................ 37 Table 8. Vegetation Plot Sampling Metadata .......................................................................................................... 37 Table 9. Total and Planted Stem Count by Plot and Species ................................................................................... 38 Appendix D – Stream Survey Data ........................................................................................................................... 40
Cross‐Section Plots .................................................................................................................................................. 41 Longitudinal Profile Plots ......................................................................................................................................... 58 Pebble Count Plots .................................................................................................................................................. 65 Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table ..................................................................................................... 71 Table 11. Monitoring Morphology Data Table ........................................................................................................ 78 Appendix E – Hydrologic Data .................................................................................................................................. 85
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events ................................................................................................................. 86 Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table ........................................................................................ 86 Groundwater Level Monitoring Well Plots .............................................................................................................. 87
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 INTRODUCTION The Valley Fields Farm (VFF) stream and wetland restoration project comprises 10,071 linear feet of stream restoration and 8,730 linear feet of stream preservation with approximately 3.1 acres of wetland restoration and 7.2 acres of wetland enhancement/preservation. Site construction was completed in June 2008 and plantings were completed in December 2008. This report represents the 3rd year of monitoring data collection. 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION The project is within USGS Hydrologic Cataloging Unit (HUC) 03040103030030 of the Yadkin River Basin. This 14‐digit HUC has been identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) by EEP’s Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities Plan 2009. The project is in Davidson County approximately four miles northwest of High Point and located off of Shadow Valley Road. 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The restoration of the Valley Fields Farm Site offers an opportunity to add functional stream and wetland uplift to the Yadkin River Basin. The project goals include the following: • • •
Preserve stable on‐site streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers in catchments draining into the primary enhancement/restoration reaches Enhance and restore (pattern, dimension, and profile) unstable streams using natural channel design techniques Improve water quality of non‐point source storm water through Best Management Practices
These goals will be accomplished through implementation of the following objectives: • • • •
Installing in‐stream structures such as rock vanes, log vanes, and constructed riffles Removing invasive vegetation Removing crowns from wetland areas and reconnecting the floodplain by raising the streambed and/or lowering the floodplain Re‐establishing a riparian buffer
2.0 MONITORING RESULTS The survey data were collected with a survey‐grade GPS unit between December 4 and 6, 2013. The stationing for the longitudinal profile is based on the thalweg stationing and has been adjusted to match grade control structures from previous longitudinal profiles. The CVS‐EEP protocol, Level 2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data from the site. The vegetation monitoring was completed on August 1, 2013. Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
1
2.1 HYDROLOGY Four automatic recording groundwater gauges were installed to monitor soil saturation within the upper 12 inches and any surface ponding within the wetland area of the site. Daily data were collected from the automatic gauges over the growing season to ensure that the water table was within 12 inches of the surface for a minimum of 7.5% of the growing season (18 days). While there were four Infinity groundwater gauges installed on the site at the beginning of the growing season, the data on these gauges could not be collected due to gauge malfunctions. Four new Remote Data Systems gauges were installed in their place on September 23, 2013. Because of this switch, groundwater monitoring for the site only occurred for 45 days (21%) of the growing season and none of the wells showed hydrology meeting the success criteria within this limited monitoring time frame. 2.2 VEGETATION The vegetation monitoring success criterion for the planted stream riparian zone is a density of 320 stems per acre after the third year of monitoring and an allowance for 10% mortality in the fourth and fifth years with a final density of 260 stems per acre. The third‐year vegetation monitoring was based on the Level 2 CVS‐EEP vegetation monitoring protocol. There are eighteen permanent vegetation monitoring plots within the site. The corner stakes of all but six (B2, B3, B6, B7, C1, D1) of the eighteen plots were unable to be located with a metal detector and Trimble GEO XT GPS unit and so their corner stakes were reinstalled using the Trimble and 250‐foot measuring tapes to properly lay them out. Additionally, Plot A1 was under approximately 1.5 feet of water due to backwater created by a beaver dam on the main stem and the corners were unable to be located or securely reinstalled. Because the significant amount of backwater on the floodplain had killed all but a few of the woody stems in the area around Plot A1, monitoring of this plot did not occur for the current monitoring year. The beaver dam has since been removed, however, and although the original corner stakes could not be located during the end of year site walk in December 2013, new corners will be installed in the same manner as the other plots for Monitoring Year Four. The site’s average density for this monitoring period is 283 planted stems per acre. There are many volunteer woody stems throughout the site. Including volunteers, the monitoring plots averaged 1,242 total stems per acre. Eleven of the eighteen plots had a planted stem density of less than 320 stems per acre but of those eleven, only two had a total stem density (including volunteers) of less than 320 stems per acre. Invasives do not represent a problem within the site, although isolated patches of multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia), sweet autumn clematis (Clematis terniflora), and Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) occur. On the CCPV in Appendix B, P. calleryana and T. latifolia are represented by two polygons within wetland A‐5 (T. latifolia is the polygon further from the stream). On the left bank around Station 82+00, C. terniflora is represented by a polygon bordering the easement. All other polygons represent R. multiflora. Additionally, during the end of year site walk in December, it was noted that vegetation was being cut within the easement on both banks from the beginning of Reach B to approximately Station 1520+00. EEP was notified of this cutting.
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
2
2.3 STREAM Third‐year monitoring found Valley Fields Farm to be stable, with only minor changes from the previous monitoring conditions. Three beaver dams were noted within the site during an end of year site walk in December : one dam on Reach Upper A2 (STA ~67+60, no longer impounding water), another on Reach Lower A (STA ~95+40), and a final one just past the end of Reach Lower A (STA ~100+00). Additionally, several other beaver dams were removed from the site on September 3, 2013. Reaches A and B both show the effects of these beaver dams along their lengths and have significant amounts of sediment deposition within the stream channel, causing aggradation and a lack of bedform features within the stream. This aggradation has led to a number of structures being noted as missing along both of these reaches. Additionally, beaver dam impoundment has led to areas of bank scour and erosion along the entire stream and in several spots has led to a movement of the stream centerline away from the location documented in the as‐built plans. Please see Appendix B Stream Problem Area Photos. These areas will continue to be watched closely in Monitoring Year Four. The longitudinal and cross‐section data reflect the overall stability of the site despite the problems caused by the beaver. Four of the nine cross‐sections along Reach A show stream bed aggradation ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 feet as compared to Monitoring Year Two data. The longitudinal profile shows similar levels of aggradation within Upper A and Lower A but as a whole the site has experienced little change compared to the Monitoring Year Two data. As a part of the stream success criteria, the stream must experience at least two bankfull events, each in separate monitoring years. The site has experienced multiple bankfull events since construction, but due to the extensive backwater created by the beaver dams on the site, none were recorded during Monitoring Year Three. Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Stream centerlines for tributaries D through N provided by EEP. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the EEP’s website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request. 3.0 REFERENCES Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS‐EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) NCEEP. 2009. Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities. (http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=7f49dbf7‐ac1f‐4d56‐83d6‐ 8ab892d5c672&groupId=60329) USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR‐DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
3
APPENDIX A – PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
4
Appendix A
FIGURE 1. SITE VICINITY MAP
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
5
Appendix A
FIGURE 2. MITIGATION PLANVIEW
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
6
Appendix A
TABLE 1. PROJECT COMPONENTS Mitigation Credits
Stream
Type LF/Acres Credits TOTAL CREDITS
R RE 10,071 8,730 10,071 1,746 11,817
Riparian Wetland R 3.1 3.1
RE 7.2 2.8 5.9
Non‐riparian Wetland R ‐ ‐
Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
‐ ‐
Nitrogen Nutrient Offset ‐ ‐
‐
‐
‐
Restoration Footage or Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
3,078
1:1
Buffer
RE ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐
Project Components Project Component ‐ or ‐ Reach ID Upper A
Stationing/ Location
50+00 – 80+78 80+78 – Lower A 100+13 1500+00 – Reach B 1524+92 1000+00 – Reach C 1014+89 200+00 – Reach D 202+95 Reach J (Pond 350+00 – Tributary) 350+61 100+13 – Reach A 102+89 Reach E ‐ Reach F ‐ Reach G ‐ Reach H ‐ Reach K ‐ Reach L ‐ Reach M ‐ Wetland A‐5 ‐ Wetland A‐4 ‐ Wetland B‐1 ‐ Wetland B‐2 ‐ Wetland B‐3 ‐ Wetland D‐1 ‐ Wetland A‐6 ‐ Wetland A‐4 ‐ Wetland A‐3 ‐ Wetland A‐1 ‐ Wetland A‐2 ‐ Wetland A‐7 ‐ Wetland A‐8 ‐
Existing Footage/ Acreage
Approach (PI, PII, etc.)
3,100
P2
Restoration ‐ or ‐ Restoration Equivalent Restoration
2,284
P2
Restoration
1,935
1:1
2,550
P2
Restoration
2,492
1:1
1,560
P1
Restoration
1,489
1:1
240
P1
Restoration
295
1:1
61
P2
Restoration
61
1:1
276
‐
Restoration
276
1:1
2,930 1,840 1,200 1,400 240 700 420 ‐ ‐ 0.10 0.70 0.20 0.20 1.70 1.80 0.20 0.60 0.50 0.40 1.20
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Preservation Preservation Preservation Preservation Preservation Preservation Preservation Restoration Restoration Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Preservation Preservation Preservation Preservation
2,930 1,840 1,200 1,400 240 700 420 3.00 0.10 0.10 0.40 0.08 0.20 1.70 1.80 0.20 0.60 0.50 0.40 1.20
5:1 5:1 5:1 5:1 5:1 5:1 5:1 1:1 1:1 2:1 2:1 2:1 2:1 2:1 2:1 2:1 5:1 5:1 5:1 5:1
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
7
Appendix A Component Summation Restoration Level
Stream (linear feet)
Riverine
Restoration Enhancement Enhancement I Enhancement II Creation Preservation High Quality Preservation TOTAL
10,071 ‐ ‐ 8,730
3.1 4.5 ‐ 2.7
‐ 18,801
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Non‐riparian Wetland Buffer (acres) (acres)
Upland (acres)
Non‐ riverine ‐ ‐
‐ ‐
‐ ‐
‐ ‐
‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
10.3
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐ ‐
TABLE 2. PROJECT ACTIVITY AND REPORTING HISTORY Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 5 yrs 7 months Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 5 yrs 7 months Number of Reporting Years: 1 Data Collection Complete N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6/1/2009 10/15/2010 11/4/2010 12/6/2013
Activity or Report Mitigation Plan Final Design – Construction Plans Construction Planting Repair Baseline Monitoring/Report Year 1 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring
Actual Completion or Delivery 3/1/2006 1/31/2007 5/16/2008 5/16/2008 11/15/2008 8/17/2009 3/28/2011 12/15/2011 1/23/2014
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
8
Appendix A
TABLE 3. PROJECT CONTACTS Design Firm
Construction Contractor
Planting Contractor
Monitoring Performers MY01‐02
MY03
Kimley‐Horn and Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 33068 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 Phone: (704)333‐5131 North State Environmental 2889 Lowery Street Winston‐Salem, NC 27101 Phone: (336)725‐2010 North State Environmental 2889 Lowery Street Winston‐Salem, NC 27101 Phone: (336)725‐2010 Kimley‐Horn and Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 33068 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 Phone: (704)333‐5131 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Phone: (919) 278‐2514 Fax: (919) 783‐9266
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
9
Appendix A
TABLE 4. PROJECT ATTRIBUTE TABLE Project County Physiographic Region Ecoregion River Basin USGS HUC NCDWQ Sub‐Basin Within Extent of EEP Watershed Plan WRC Class % of Project Easement Demarcated Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
Davidson County Piedmont Southern Outer Piedmont Yadkin 3040103030030 Yadkin Sub Basin Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 Cool 0% Yes
Restoration Component Attributes Reach A 6.5 3 5660 P Developing
Drainage Area (sq.mi.) Stream Order Restored Length (feet) Perennial or Intermittent Watershed Type Watershed LULC Distribution
Reach B 2.3 2 2492 P Developing
Reach C 0.2 1 1489 P Developing
Forest/Wetland Cultivated Developed Watershed Impervious Cover NCDWQ AU/Index Number NCDWQ Classification 303d Listed Upstream of 303d Listed Segment Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor Total Acreage of Easement Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration Rosgen Classification of Pre‐Existing Rosgen Classification of As‐Built Valley Type Valley Slope Valley Side Slope Range Valley Toe Slope Range Cowardin Classification Trout Waters Designation Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc. Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics Series Depth Clay% K T
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Reach D 0.2 1 295 P Developing
Reach J 0.1 1 61 P Developing
Wetland A‐5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
43% 22% 35% 47% C/3 C Yes Yes
23.5 C/2 C Yes Yes
1.9 C/1 C Yes Yes
1 C/1 C Yes Yes
1 C/1 C Yes Yes
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Degraded water quality due to sediment 31.0 22.4 22.4 G5 B5 VIII 0.003 15‐20% 2‐3% N/A No
8.5 2.3 0.5 0.1 6.9 1.7 0.4 0.1 6.9 1.7 0.4 0.08 G5 Incised B5 Incised B5 G B5c C5 B5c Ba VIII VIII VIII VIII 0.005 0.011 0.011 0.15 12‐20% 15‐40% 25‐30% 30‐35% 1‐3% 3‐5% 10‐14% 1‐2% N/A N/A N/A N/A No No No No Greensboro burrowing crayfish is of concern
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NC N/A
Chewacla loam and Wehadkee loam N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ChA 80" 5‐40% 0.28 5
10
APPENDIX B – VISUAL ASSESMENT DATA
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
11
Appendix B
TABLE 5. VISUAL STREAM MORPHOLOGY STABILITY ASSESMENT Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm Assessed Length 1,250 Major C hanne l C ate gory 1. Be d
C hanne l Sub-C ate gory 1. Ve rtical Stability (Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle C ondition* 3. Me ande r Pool C ondition
4.Thalwe g Position
2. Bank
1. Scoure d/Eroding
2. Unde rcut
3. Mass W asting
Reach - Upper A
Me tric 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 1. T exture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 1. T halweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 2. T halweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
Numbe r Stable , Pe rforming as Inte nde d
Total Numbe r in As-built
1. O ve rall Inte grity 2. Grade C ontrol 2a. Piping 3. Bank Prote ction
4. Habitat
*=sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
% Stable , Pe rforming as Inte nde d
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
5
-
2
5
40%
2
5
40%
5
5
100%
5
5
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. Bank slumping, calving, or collapse Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Amount of Unstable Footage
-
Totals 3. Engine e re d Structure s
Numbe r of Unstable Se gme nts
4
65
97%
0
0
100%
0 4
0 65
100% 97%
2
4
50%
2
4
50%
2
4
50%
2
4
50%
2
4
50%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
18
Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm Assessed Length 2,050 Major C hanne l C ate gory 1. Be d
C hanne l Sub-C ate gory 1. Ve rtical Stabili ty (Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle C ondi tion* 3. Me ande r Pool C onditi on
4.Thalwe g Posi tion
2. Bank
1. Scoure d/Eroding
2. Unde rcut
3. Mass W asti ng
Reach - Upper A2
Me tric 1. Aggradat ion - Bar formation/growt h sufficient to significantly deflect flow lat erally (not to include point bars) 2. Degradat ion - Evidence of downcut ting 1. T exture/Subst rate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 1. T halweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 2. T halweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
Numbe r Stabl e , Pe rforming as Inte nde d
Total Numbe r in As-bui lt
1. O ve rall Inte grity 2. Grade C ontrol 2a. Piping 3. Bank Prote ction
4. Habitat
*=sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
% Stabl e , Pe rformi ng as Inte nde d
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
20
-
11
20
55%
11
20
55%
20
20
100%
20
20
100%
Bank lacking veget ative cover resulting simply from poor growt h and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to t he extent that mass wast ing appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts t hat are modest , appear sust ainable and are providing habitat. Bank slumping, calving, or collapse Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Grade control structures exhibit ing maintenance of grade across t he sill. Structures lacking any substantial flow underneat h sills or arms. Bank erosion wit hin the struct ures ext ent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for t his table in EEP monit oring guidance document ) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Amount of Unstabl e Footage
-
Totals 3. Engine e re d Structure s
Numbe r of Unstable Se gme nts
4
150
96%
0
0
100%
0 4
0 150
100% 96%
13
13
100%
13
13
100%
13
13
100%
13
13
100%
13
13
100%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
19
Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm Assessed Length 2,000 Major C hanne l C ate gory 1. Be d
C hanne l Sub-C ate gory 1. Ve rtical Stabili ty (Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle C ondi tion* 3. Me ande r Pool C onditi on
4.Thalwe g Posi tion
2. Bank
1. Scoure d/Eroding
2. Unde rcut
3. Mass W asti ng
Reach - Lower A
Me tric 1. Aggradat ion - Bar formation/growt h sufficient to significantly deflect flow lat erally (not to include point bars) 2. Degradat ion - Evidence of downcut ting 1. T exture/Subst rate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 1. T halweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 2. T halweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
Numbe r Stabl e , Pe rforming as Inte nde d
Total Numbe r in As-bui lt
1. O ve rall Inte grity 2. Grade C ontrol 2a. Piping 3. Bank Prote ction
4. Habitat
*=sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
% Stabl e , Pe rformi ng as Inte nde d
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
10
-
0
10
0%
0
10
0%
9
10
90%
9
10
90%
Bank lacking veget ative cover resulting simply from poor growt h and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to t he extent that mass wast ing appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts t hat are modest , appear sust ainable and are providing habitat. Bank slumping, calving, or collapse Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Grade control structures exhibit ing maintenance of grade across t he sill. Structures lacking any substantial flow underneat h sills or arms. Bank erosion wit hin the struct ures ext ent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for t his table in EEP monit oring guidance document ) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Amount of Unstabl e Footage
-
Totals 3. Engine e re d Structure s
Numbe r of Unstable Se gme nts
4
100
98%
0
0
100%
0 4
0 100
100% 98%
0
6
0%
0
6
0%
0
6
0%
0
6
0%
0
6
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
20
Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm Assessed Length 1,275 Major C hanne l C ate gory 1. Be d
C hanne l Sub-C ate gory 1. Ve rtical Stabili ty (Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle C ondi tion* 3. Me ande r Pool C onditi on
4.Thalwe g Posi tion
2. Bank
1. Scoure d/Eroding
2. Unde rcut
3. Mass W asti ng
Reach - Upper B
Me tric 1. Aggradat ion - Bar formation/growt h sufficient to significantly deflect flow lat erally (not to include point bars) 2. Degradat ion - Evidence of downcut ting 1. T exture/Subst rate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 1. T halweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 2. T halweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
Numbe r Stabl e , Pe rforming as Inte nde d
Total Numbe r in As-bui lt
1. O ve rall Inte grity 2. Grade C ontrol 2a. Piping 3. Bank Prote ction
4. Habitat
*=sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
% Stabl e , Pe rformi ng as Inte nde d
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
2
-
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
Bank lacking veget ative cover resulting simply from poor growt h and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to t he extent that mass wast ing appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts t hat are modest , appear sust ainable and are providing habitat. Bank slumping, calving, or collapse Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Grade control structures exhibit ing maintenance of grade across t he sill. Structures lacking any substantial flow underneat h sills or arms. Bank erosion wit hin the struct ures ext ent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for t his table in EEP monit oring guidance document ) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Amount of Unstabl e Footage
-
Totals 3. Engine e re d Structure s
Numbe r of Unstable Se gme nts
2
61
98%
0
0
100%
0 2
0 61
100% 98%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
21
Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm Assessed Length 1,275 Major C hanne l C ate gory 1. Be d
C hanne l Sub-C ate gory 1. Ve rtical Stabili ty (Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle C ondi tion* 3. Me ande r Pool C onditi on
4.Thalwe g Posi tion
2. Bank
1. Scoure d/Eroding
2. Unde rcut
3. Mass W asti ng
Reach - Lower B
Me tric 1. Aggradat ion - Bar formation/growt h sufficient to significantly deflect flow lat erally (not to include point bars) 2. Degradat ion - Evidence of downcut ting 1. T exture/Subst rate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 1. T halweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 2. T halweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
Numbe r Stabl e , Pe rforming as Inte nde d
Total Numbe r in As-bui lt
1. O ve rall Inte grity 2. Grade C ontrol 2a. Piping 3. Bank Prote ction
4. Habitat
*=sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
% Stabl e , Pe rformi ng as Inte nde d
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
2
-
0
2
0%
0
2
0%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
Bank lacking veget ative cover resulting simply from poor growt h and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to t he extent that mass wast ing appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts t hat are modest , appear sust ainable and are providing habitat. Bank slumping, calving, or collapse Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Grade control structures exhibit ing maintenance of grade across t he sill. Structures lacking any substantial flow underneat h sills or arms. Bank erosion wit hin the struct ures ext ent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for t his table in EEP monit oring guidance document ) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Amount of Unstabl e Footage
-
Totals 3. Engine e re d Structure s
Numbe r of Unstable Se gme nts
3
105
96%
0
0
100%
0 3
0 105
100% 96%
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
22
Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm Assessed Length 1,500 Major C hanne l C ate gory 1. Be d
C hanne l Sub-C ate gory 1. Ve rtical Stabili ty (Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle C ondi tion* 3. Me ande r Pool C onditi on
4.Thalwe g Posi tion
2. Bank
1. Scoure d/Eroding
2. Unde rcut
3. Mass W asti ng
Reach - C
Me tric 1. Aggradat ion - Bar formation/growt h sufficient to significantly deflect flow lat erally (not to include point bars) 2. Degradat ion - Evidence of downcut ting 1. T exture/Subst rate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 1. T halweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 2. T halweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
Numbe r Stabl e , Pe rforming as Inte nde d
Total Numbe r in As-bui lt
1. O ve rall Inte grity 2. Grade C ontrol 2a. Piping 3. Bank Prote ction
4. Habitat
*=sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
% Stabl e , Pe rformi ng as Inte nde d
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
24
-
1
24
4%
1
24
4%
24
24
100%
24
24
100%
Bank lacking veget ative cover resulting simply from poor growt h and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to t he extent that mass wast ing appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts t hat are modest , appear sust ainable and are providing habitat. Bank slumping, calving, or collapse Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Grade control structures exhibit ing maintenance of grade across t he sill. Structures lacking any substantial flow underneat h sills or arms. Bank erosion wit hin the struct ures ext ent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for t his table in EEP monit oring guidance document ) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Amount of Unstabl e Footage
-
Totals 3. Engine e re d Structure s
Numbe r of Unstable Se gme nts
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0 0
0 0
100% 100%
17
17
100%
17
17
100%
17
17
100%
17
17
100%
17
17
100%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
23
Appendix B
TABLE 6. VEGETATION CONDITION ASSESMENT Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm Planted Acreage 81.9
Vegetation Category 1. Bare Areas 2. Low S tem Density Areas
Definitions Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on M Y3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Easement Acreage 97.5 CCPV Depiction
Number of Polygons
Combined Acreage
% of Planted Acreage
0.1 acre
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
0.1 acre
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
0
0.00
0.0%
0
0.00
0.0%
0
0.00
0.0%
Mapping Threshold
Total Areas with woody stems of a size 3. Areas of Poor class that are obviously small given Growth Rates or Vigor the monitoring year.
Pattern and Color
0.25 acre
Cumulative Total 4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000 SF
Purple Polygon
16
1.20
1.2%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Green Polygon
7
1.50
1.5%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
24
Appendix B
STREAM AND WETLAND PHOTOS
PA 01 – 12/18/2013
PA 03 – 12/18/2013
PA 05 – 12/18/2013 Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PA 02 – 12/18/2013
PA 04 – 12/18/2013
PA 06 – 12/18/2013
25
Appendix B
PA 07 – 12/18/2013
PA 09 – 12/18/2013
PA 11 – 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PA 08 – 12/18/2013
PA 10 – 12/18/2013
PA 12 – 12/18/2013
26
Appendix B
PA 13 – 12/18/2013
PA 15 – 12/18/2013
PA 17 – 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PA 14 – 12/18/2013
PA 16 – 12/18/2013
PB 01 – 12/18/2013
27
Appendix B
PB 02 – 12/18/2013
PB 04 – 12/18/2013
PB 06 – 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PB 03 – 12/18/2013
PB 05 – 12/18/2013
PB 07 – 12/18/2013
28
Appendix B
PB 08 – 12/18/2013
PB 10 – 12/18/2013
PC 01 – 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PB 09 – 12/18/2013
PB 11 – 12/18/2013
PC 02 – 12/18/2013
29
Appendix B
PC 03 – 12/18/2013
PC 05 – 12/18/2013
PD 01 – 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PC 04 – 12/18/2013
PC 06 – 12/18/2013
PD 02 – 12/18/2013
30
Appendix B
PD 03 – 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
31
Appendix B
STREAM PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
Bank erosion (Station 79+00) – 12/18/2013
Beaver dam (Station 95+75) – 12/18/2013
Bank erosion (Station 50+00) – 12/18/2013 Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Thalweg shift (Station 84+00) – 12/18/2013
Beaver dam (Station 99+75) – 12/18/2013
Deposition (typical along Reach B) – 12/18/2013
32
Appendix B
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOS
Plot VQA02 – 8/1/2013
Plot VQA03 – 7/31/2013
Plot VQA05 – 8/1/2013 Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Plot VQA07 – 8/1/2013
Plot VQA08 – 7/31/2013
Plot VQA11 – 7/31/2013
33
Appendix B
Plot VQA12 – 7/31/2013
Plot VQA13 – 7/31/2013
Plot VQB02 – 7/30/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Plot VQB03 – 7/29/2013
Plot VQB06 – 7/30/2013
Plot VQB07 – 7/30/2013
34
Appendix B
Plot VQC01 – 8/1/2013
Plot VQC03 – 8/1/2013
Plot VQD01 – 7/30/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Plot VQW01 – 7/29/2013
Plot VQW04 – 8/1/2013
35
APPENDIX C – VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
36
Appendix C
TABLE 7. VEGETATION PLOTS WOODY STEM SUCCESS CRITERIA ATTAINMENT TABLE Plot Name VQA1 VQA2 VQA3 VQA5 VQA7 VQA8 VQA11 VQA12 VQA13 VQB2 VQB3 VQB6 VQB7 VQC1 VQC3 VQD1 VQW1 VQW4
Success Criteria Achieved/Number of Planted Stems per Acre MY‐01 (2010) MY‐02 (2011) MY‐03 (2013) MY‐04 (2014) No Yes No/0 No No No/150 No No No/50 Yes Yes No/300 No Yes No/250 No No Yes/400 Yes Yes No/300 No Yes Yes/400 Yes Yes No/100 No No No/200 Yes Yes Yes/450 No No No/300 No Yes Yes/350 Yes Yes Yes/400 Yes Yes Yes/700 No No No/150 Yes Yes No/300 No No No/300
MY‐05 (2015)
TABLE 8. VEGETATION PLOT SAMPLING METADATA Report Prepared By Date Prepared Database name Database location
Tommy Seelinger 10/25/2013 14:16 N/A1 N/A1
1=no CVS project data was able to be located within EEP’s servers
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
37
Appendix C
Scientific Name
Common Name
VQA 1
Acer negundo Alnus serrulata Betula nigra
Box Elder
TABLE 9. TOTAL AND PLANTED STEM COUNT BY PLOT AND SPECIES
Tag Alder River Birch
Celtis laevigata Cephalanthus occidentalis Cornus amomum Corylus americana Diospyros virginiana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Hamamelis virginiana Juglans nigra Liriodendron tulipifera Platanus occidentalis Quercus lyrata Quercus phellos Salix nigra Salix sericea Ulmus alata Ulmus americana
1
2
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
1 2
3
4
3
5 1
5
1
1
2 15 4 100 850
4 0 3 200 200
9 35 6 450 2200
7 19 7 350 1300
1 8 47 8 400 2750
14 8 4 700 1100
3 18 6 150 1050
1 6 18 6 300 1200
1 6 11 5 300 850
VQB 2
VQB 3
Sugarberry
Buttonbush
Silky Dogwood
1
4
1
Hazelnut
1
2
Persimmon
1
2
1
Green Ash
1
4
1
Witch Hazel
Black Walnut
2
Tulip Poplar
American Sycamore
3
2
2
3 31 4 150 1700
1 41 11 50 2100
Winged Elm American Elm
Willow Oak Black Willow Silky Willow
Planted Stem Count Volunteer Stem Count Species Count Planted Stems/acre Total Stems/acre
0
0 0 0 0
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
VQA 8 1
VQ W4
VQA 13
VQA 7
VQ W1
VQA 3
Overcup Oak
VQA 5
VQD 1
VQA 2 2
VQA 11 2
VQA 12 1
2 1
1 1
5 21 5 250 1300
5 2 5 250 350
8 14 7 400 1100
6 4 3 300 500
8 42 7 400 2500
VQB 6 3
VQB 7
VQC 1
1 3
VQC 3 6
1
2 6 19 4 300 1250
38
Appendix C
Annual Means Scientific Name Acer negundo Acer rubrum Aesculus sylvatica Albizia julibrissin Alnus serrulata Asimina triloba Betula nigra Carpinus caroliniana Celtis laevigata Cephalanthus occidentalis Cercis canadensis Cornus amomum Corylus americana Crategeou crus‐gali Diospyros virginiana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Hamamelis virginiana Ilex opaca Juglans nigra Juniperus virginiana Lindera benzoin Liquidambar styraciflua Liriodendron tulipera Nyssa sylvatica Pinus echinata Pinus taeda Plantanus occidentalis Pyrus calleryana Quercus lyrata Quercus michauxii Quercus nigra Quercus phellos Quercus shumardii Quercus sp. Salix nigra Salix sericea Ulmus alata Ulmus americana Ulmus parvifolia Unknown
Common Name Boxelder Red Maple Painted Buckeye Mimosa Tag Alder Paw‐paw River Birch Hornbeam Sugarberry Buttonbush Redbud Silky Dogwood American Hazelnut Cockspur Hawthorn Persimmon Green Ash Witch Hazel American Holly Black Walnut Eastern Redcedar Spicebush Sweetgum Tulip Poplar Black Gum Shortleaf Pine Loblolly Pine American Sycamore Callery Pear Overcup Oak Swamp Chestnut Oak Water Oak Willow Oak Shumard Oak Oak Black Willow Silky Willow Winged Elm American Elm Lacebark Elm
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Species MY3 (2013) MY2 (2011) MY1 (2010) MY0 (2008) Type P‐all T P‐all T P‐all T P‐all T Tree 9 47 2 2 1 1 1 1 Tree 4 1 1 2 2 2 2 Tree 9 Tree 1 Tree 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tree 1 Tree 4 11 2 2 2 1 2 2 Tree 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 Tree 1 2 1 Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Tree 1 Tree 6 1 3 1 1 1 1 Tree 3 7 Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tree 6 13 4 5 Tree 16 86 1 4 1 3 1 1 Tree 1 2 Tree 1 1 2 Tree 2 7 Tree 2 Tree 14 Tree 75 3 2 Tree 3 8 1 3 1 6 1 1 Tree 1 Tree 1 1 1 1 Tree 1 Tree 17 65 2 5 3 5 3 3 Tree 3 Tree 1 Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tree 2 4 1 Tree 1 1 Tree 1 Tree 12 55 5 5 Tree 2 4 Tree 1 Tree 5 6 1 2 Tree 1 7 1 6 6 6 6
Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count
102
Stems per ACRE
516
8 0.20 19
429
25
26
50
8 0.20 15
24
26 53 8 0.20 15 22
26 8 0.20 15
26
15
2170 131 255.3 131.5 267 131.5 132
39
APPENDIX D – STREAM SURVEY DATA
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
40
Appendix D
CROSS‐SECTION PLOTS
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A1, Riffle) Station 75+65 6.5 12/6/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 762.07 761.74 761.68 761.52 761.26 761.32 761.23 761.22 761.01 760.84 760.69 760.57 760.07 757.42 756.95 757.19 757.05 756.70 756.33 755.60 755.34 756.16 758.84 759.31 759.99 760.12 760.80 761.26 761.30 761.82 762.03 761.88 761.92 762.12 762.23
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
760.8 64.2 23.6 766.3 >120 5.5 2.7 8.7 5.1 1.0 Stream Type
C5
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A1, Riffle) Station 75+65 768 766 764
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.3 4.2 9.0 13.8 18.8 24.0 28.8 33.6 38.1 42.1 46.3 47.3 47.8 49.3 51.1 53.2 54.4 56.1 57.5 59.5 61.3 62.1 62.9 64.8 67.2 69.3 71.5 76.6 81.3 85.9 91.3 95.7 101.3 105.7
762 760 758 756 754 0
20 Baseline, 2008
40
60 MY-02,Station 2011
MY-01, 2010
80 (feet)
MY-03, 2013
100 Bankfull
120 Flood Prone Area
*additonal point not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
41
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A2, Riffle Station 74+70 6.5 12/6/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 762.30 761.87 761.86 761.82 761.90 761.77 761.49 760.98 761.12 761.25 761.03 761.01 759.91 758.32 756.90 756.09 756.38 756.26 756.49 756.35 756.56 756.81 757.05 757.44 757.73 758.02 758.35 758.63 759.20 760.01 760.67 761.02 761.38 761.82 761.77
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
760.7 67.7 23.6 765.3 >100 4.6 2.9 8.2 4.2 1.0 Stream Type
C5
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A2, Riffle Station 74+70 766
764
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.4 6.4 10.5 15.6 21.0 26.4 31.4 36.1 40.8 45.6 47.6 48.7 49.1 49.9 51.3 52.2 53.6 54.8 56.4 58.1 59.6 61.0 62.4 64.0 64.9 66.5 68.2 68.9 70.5 72.4 74.3 77.4 81.0 84.8
762
760
758
756
754 0
20 Baseline, 2008
40
60 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
(feet)
MY-03, 2013
80 Bankfull
100 Flood Prone Area
*additonal points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
42
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A3, Riffle) Station 71+55 6.5 12/6/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 763.40 763.23 763.32 763.15 762.56 762.72 761.98 761.60 761.01 760.45 759.34 759.05 759.04 758.95 758.86 758.58 758.13 758.06 758.16 757.97 758.30 760.09 760.91 761.50 762.47 762.65 762.47 762.61 762.90 763.25 763.65 763.95 764.03 763.91 764.04
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
762.0 54.6 23.1 766.0 >90 4.0 2.4 10.1 3.9 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A3, Riffle) Station 71+55 767 766 765 764
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.4 5.6 9.7 12.9 17.1 19.2 22.3 23.4 24.4 25.5 26.8 27.9 29.4 30.9 32.1 33.3 34.8 36.6 37.6 38.4 39.5 40.3 41.5 42.9 44.7 48.1 51.4 56.2 59.3 61.7 65.7 69.1 73.8 78.5
763 762 761 760 759 758 757 0
10
20 Baseline, 2008
30
40 Station (feet) MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
50 MY-03, 2013
60
70 Bankfull
80
90
Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
43
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A4, Pool) Station 64+30 6.5 12/6/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 765.73 765.64 765.49 764.97 764.59 764.01 763.21 759.89 759.99 760.16 760.27 760.05 760.00 759.97 759.93 759.78 759.85 759.66 760.24 763.02 763.86 764.46 764.71 764.71 764.87 764.76 764.68 764.63 764.38 764.40 764.31 764.34 764.54
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
764.0 68.5 19.4 4.3 3.5 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A4, Pool) Station 64+30 767 766 765 764
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 3.3 6.9 10.4 13.5 18.5 19.2 20.0 21.1 22.2 23.6 25.0 26.3 28.5 30.0 31.5 33.4 35.2 35.9 36.5 37.6 39.2 43.3 47.6 51.3 55.2 59.4 63.2 67.0 71.0 75.2 78.4 78.6
763 762 761 760 759 758
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
0
10
20 Baseline, 2008
30 MY-01, 2010
40 StationMY-02, (feet) 2011
50 MY-03, 2013
60
70 Bankfull
44
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A5, Riffle) Station 58+12 6.5 12/6/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 767.44 767.13 767.07 767.08 767.04 766.28 766.07 766.00 766.31 766.40 766.10 765.31 764.45 763.89 763.59 763.27 762.90 762.72 762.86 762.91 763.05 763.12 763.27 763.41 763.69 764.03 765.78 766.71 766.83 766.33 765.97 765.86 766.05 766.33 766.46
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
765.7 33.4 16.6 768.7 >90 3.0 2.0 8.3 5.4 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A5, Riffle) Station 58+12 769 768 767
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.2 4.1 8.0 11.5 15.5 18.6 22.0 23.8 25.4 27.2 28.0 28.9 29.9 31.4 32.3 33.3 34.3 35.6 36.9 38.4 39.9 41.3 42.4 43.3 44.3 44.6 46.3 47.8 49.7 53.1 56.3 60.6 64.6 69.0
766 765 764 763 762 0
10
20 Baseline, 2008
30
40 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
50 (feet)
60 MY-03, 2013
70 Bankfull
80
90
Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
45
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A6, Riffle) Station 54+55 6.5 12/6/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 768.72 768.54 768.31 767.50 767.23 767.44 767.94 767.95 766.99 766.51 764.67 763.45 763.69 763.71 763.65 763.89 763.94 764.07 764.22 764.46 764.49 764.50 764.47 764.40 764.41 764.68 765.44 766.58 766.93 766.98 766.96 767.29 767.60 768.40 768.66
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
766.9 45.4 20.2 770.3 >90 3.4 2.2 9.0 4.5 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A6, Riffle) Station 54+55 771 770 769 768
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.2 3.3 6.0 9.1 12.1 13.7 15.7 17.1 18.0 18.5 18.9 20.2 21.3 22.3 23.3 24.5 25.7 26.8 28.0 29.5 30.7 32.1 33.4 34.7 35.9 37.2 37.9 39.3 42.5 46.1 50.0 53.1 56.6 59.7
767 766 765 764 763 762 761 0
10
20 Baseline, 2008
30
40 MY-02,Station 2011
MY-01,2010
50 (feet)
MY-03, 2013
60 Bankfull
70
80
Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
46
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A7, Pool) Station 54+15 6.5 12/6/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 769.65 769.34 769.54 769.56 768.70 768.24 767.63 767.57 767.41 767.82 766.96 766.37 763.72 763.61 763.39 763.43 763.55 763.91 764.08 764.14 764.25 764.32 764.41 764.34 764.77 765.62 767.11 767.55 767.75 767.68 768.18 768.05 768.23 768.27 768.39
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
767.0 43.2 16.3 3.6 2.7 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A7, Pool) Station 54+15 770 769 768
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.5 5.7 9.0 11.2 12.8 14.8 17.6 20.3 22.6 23.9 24.8 25.0 26.4 27.3 28.5 29.6 30.7 31.7 33.1 34.4 35.5 36.4 37.5 38.4 39.0 40.3 42.1 44.6 47.0 50.2 53.0 57.1 60.3 63.4
767 766 765 764 763 762 0
10
20 Baseline, 2008
30
40 MY-01, 2010
50
StationMY-02, (feet) 2011
60 MY-03, 2013
70
80
Bankfull
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
47
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A10, Riffle) Station 93+50 6.5 12/4/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 756.02 755.68 755.95 756.39 756.63 756.57 756.25 756.27 756.05 755.41 755.23 754.61 753.35 752.20 751.87 752.37 752.37 752.19 752.23 752.29 752.19 752.16 752.09 751.91 752.22 753.23 753.63 753.95 754.34 754.75 754.72 754.82 754.95 755.72 755.98
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
755.5 69.3 35.0 759.1 >90 3.6 2.0 17.7 2.6 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A10, Riffle) Station 93+50 761 760 759 758
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.0 5.1 9.0 13.7 18.5 23.5 27.7 33.5 36.9 42.7 44.0 44.6 45.3 47.0 48.4 49.8 51.0 52.2 54.3 55.6 57.3 59.1 60.3 60.9 62.2 62.9 64.1 65.2 66.3 67.6 69.4 70.4 71.8 75.2
757 756 755 754 753 752 751 0
20 Baseline, 2008
40
60 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
80 (feet)
MY-03, 2013
100 Bankfull
120
Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
48
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - A11, Riffle) Station 94+55 6.5 12/4/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 755.24 754.72 755.24 755.41 755.43 755.57 755.35 754.87 754.35 754.62 754.79 754.23 753.19 753.46 753.15 753.16 753.03 753.11 753.11 753.13 752.87 752.76 752.44 752.35 752.39 752.14 751.79 752.03 753.21 755.05 755.27 755.24 755.52 755.53 755.98
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
754.9 44.9 26.1 758.0 >90 3.1 1.7 15.2 3.4 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A11, Riffle) Station 94+55 762 760 758
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.2 4.3 8.2 13.1 18.7 23.1 26.6 31.0 34.7 37.7 38.8 39.7 40.7 42.1 43.2 44.7 46.5 48.5 50.7 51.9 53.3 54.7 56.1 57.6 59.6 61.0 62.4 63.2 64.5 65.7 69.3 72.0 75.9 78.7
756 754 752 750 748 0
20 Baseline, 2008
40
60 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
80 (feet)
MY-03, 2013
100 Bankfull
120 Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
49
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - B1, Riffle) Station 1503+75 2.3 12/4/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 772.26 772.04 772.17 772.12 772.35 772.32 772.43 772.31 771.38 770.61 769.77 768.84 767.89 767.04 766.59 766.60 766.80 767.06 767.16 766.98 766.79 765.71 764.81 764.29 763.77 763.70 763.77 763.86 763.79 763.68 763.55 763.39 763.28 763.24 763.10
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
769.338 769.338
766.1 58.0 24.3 769.3 89.9 3.2 2.4 10.2 3.7 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - B1, Riffle) Station 1503+75 774 772 770
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.4 3.2 6.9 10.7 15.0 19.2 22.3 25.3 27.7 30.4 33.3 36.1 39.3 41.6 47.0 51.6 55.4 59.0 62.3 65.5 66.3 67.4 68.7 70.1 71.2 72.1 73.1 74.2 75.3 76.4 77.4 78.4 79.4 80.4
0 149.18104
768 766 764 762 760 0
20 Baseline, 2008
40
60
80 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
(feet)
100 MY-03, 2013
120 Bankfull
140
Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
50
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - B2, Riffle) Station 1054+20 2.3 12/4/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 772.24 772.07 772.28 772.28 772.46 772.48 771.44 770.25 769.22 768.17 767.31 766.67 766.48 766.54 767.01 767.18 767.09 767.11 767.00 766.29 765.92 765.73 765.74 764.13 763.46 763.59 763.52 763.59 763.57 763.42 762.94 763.07 763.21 763.04 763.03
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
768.963 768.963
765.9 62.1 27.5 769.0 97.2 3.1 2.3 12.2 3.5 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - B2, Riffle) Station 1054+20 774 772 770
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.3 3.6 8.8 12.9 14.7 17.8 21.3 24.2 27.4 30.7 35.0 39.4 42.9 47.3 50.8 54.6 58.6 62.5 65.2 67.0 68.6 69.2 69.8 71.3 72.2 73.2 74.2 75.0 76.1 77.8 79.0 80.3 81.3 83.1
0 148.28676
768 766 764 762 760 0
20 Baseline, 2008
40
60
80 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
(feet)
100 MY-03, 2013
120 Bankfull
140
Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
51
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - B3, Riffle) Station 1516+50 2.3 12/4/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 766.38 766.20 766.27 766.23 766.05 765.19 764.23 763.40 762.13 761.43 761.00 760.71 760.71 760.88 760.74 761.24 761.07 760.64 759.63 758.94 758.69 758.26 757.76 757.79 757.68 757.75 757.48 757.47 757.71 757.92 758.24 758.29 758.46 759.03 759.51
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
760.7 37.5 23.1 763.9 90.8 3.2 1.6 14.2 3.9 1.0 B5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - B3, Riffle) Station 1516+50 768 766
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.3 4.6 8.9 12.6 14.7 16.8 19.5 22.1 24.1 26.2 29.0 31.8 36.0 39.7 43.5 45.9 47.1 48.1 49.4 50.3 51.1 52.1 53.0 54.1 55.2 56.1 57.2 58.3 59.2 60.0 61.3 62.3 63.2 64.3
764 762 760 758 756 0
20 Baseline, 2008
40
60 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
80 (feet)
MY-03, 2013
100 Bankfull
120 Flood Prone Area
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
52
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - B4, Pool) Station 1516+90 2.3 12/4/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 765.29 764.93 764.63 764.52 764.56 764.40 763.96 763.20 762.51 761.54 761.05 760.70 760.80 760.66 760.48 760.50 759.88 759.53 758.69 758.06 758.16 758.22 758.27 758.16 757.95 757.79 757.68 757.47 757.44 757.52 758.34 759.05 759.82 760.99 761.28
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
760.4 35.6 19.7 3.0 2.0 B5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - B4, Pool) Station 1516+90 766 765 764 763
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.4 5.2 9.8 13.6 16.8 19.3 21.4 24.1 26.4 29.1 32.8 36.7 39.8 43.6 47.3 48.8 49.8 50.7 51.3 52.8 54.0 55.1 56.5 57.7 58.9 60.5 61.8 63.4 64.9 65.1 66.2 67.4 69.5 72.4
762 761 760 759 758 757 756 0
20
40 Baseline, 2008
60 MY-01, 2010
StationMY-02, (feet) 2011
80
100 MY-03, 2013
120 Bankfull
*additional points not included due to space
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
53
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - C1, Riffle) Station 1003+15 0.2 12/5/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 777.17 776.59 776.67 776.51 776.27 775.93 775.90 775.36 775.44 774.83 774.51 773.80 773.69 773.72 773.97 775.35 775.62 775.47 775.59 776.32 776.84 777.24 777.59 778.30 778.51 778.68 779.00 779.30 779.46 780.02
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
775.3 5.6 5.8 776.9 46.0 1.6 1.0 6.0 7.9 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - C1, Riffle) Station 1003+15 781 780 779
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.7 4.1 7.5 12.1 16.0 21.0 24.7 26.4 27.7 28.4 29.4 30.5 31.5 32.4 33.1 33.7 35.7 39.3 41.8 46.0 49.2 52.5 56.1 59.3 63.6 67.9 74.2 76.0 76.2
778 777 776 775 774 773 772 0
10 Baseline, 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
20
30
40 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
(feet)
50 MY-03, 2013
60 Bankfull
70 Flood Prone Area
54
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - C2, Pool) Station 1004+00 0.2 12/5/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 776.17 775.56 776.06 775.83 775.73 775.63 775.26 774.71 774.75 774.17 773.77 773.07 773.33 773.05 773.81 774.71 775.37 775.13 775.23 775.85 776.38 776.35 776.29 776.11 775.82 775.81 776.15
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
774.0 3.3 5.2 0.9 0.6 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - C2, Pool) Station 1004+00 777 777 776 776
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.2 7.5 13.0 17.2 21.5 25.8 29.3 32.2 33.0 33.7 34.9 36.1 37.4 38.4 39.0 40.2 44.2 49.5 54.4 58.1 62.4 66.4 70.7 74.9 77.9 78.1
775 775 774 774 773 773 772 772 0
10
20 Baseline, 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
30 MY-01, 2010
40 StationMY-02, (feet) 2011
50 MY-03, 2013
60
70 Bankfull
55
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - C3, Riffle) Station 1007+10 0.2 12/5/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Station 0.0 0.3 5.0 10.6 15.2 19.3 23.4 25.9 26.8 27.7 28.8 30.2 31.2 31.8 33.3 36.7 40.3 44.9 48.6 48.9
Elevation 770.43 770.07 770.05 769.76 769.89 769.61 769.31 769.57 769.21 768.48 768.21 768.28 768.39 768.88 769.43 769.62 769.81 770.33 770.28 770.73
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
769.2 3.9 5.8 770.2 43.4 1.0 0.7 8.6 7.5 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - C3, Riffle) Station 1007+10 771 771
Elevation (feet)
770 770 769 769 768 768 0
5
10 Baseline, 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
15
20 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
25 (feet)
30 MY-03, 2013
35 Bankfull
40
45
Flood Prone Area
56
Appendix D
Yadkin Valley Fields Farm, MY03 VFF (XS - C4, Riffle) Station 1011+10 0.2 12/5/2013 T. Seelinger, M. Koss
River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 771.75 771.23 771.22 771.17 771.02 770.13 769.29 768.39 768.00 767.53 766.96 766.31 765.88 765.75 765.70 766.90 767.40 767.67 767.62 768.34 768.55 768.33 768.17 768.11 768.03 768.27
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:
767.4 5.1 4.6 769.1 38.0 1.7 1.1 4.1 8.3 1.0 C5
Stream Type
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - C4, Riffle) Station 1011+10 773 772 771
Elevation (feet)
Station 0.0 0.3 4.8 9.2 13.0 15.3 17.3 19.7 22.0 24.3 25.4 26.5 27.0 28.0 29.1 30.0 31.3 32.8 35.4 38.5 41.4 45.2 49.2 52.8 55.6 55.8
770 769 768 767 766 765 764 0
10 Baseline, 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
20
30 Station MY-02, 2011
MY-01, 2010
(feet)
40 MY-03, 2013
Bankfull
50 Flood Prone Area
57
Appendix D
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE PLOTS
Longitudinal Profile Valley Fields Farm EEP Project Number ‐ 407 Station 50+00‐58+40 (Upper A)
768 SBKF = ‐0.0011x + 772.89
766
SWS = ‐0.0017x + 773.57
764
762
760 5000
5100
5200 Baseline 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
5300 MY‐01 2010
5400 MY‐02 2011
5500 MY‐03 2013
Structures
5600 Bankfull Bankful
5700 Water Surface
5800
5900
BKF Slope
58
Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Valley Fields Farm EEP Project Number ‐ 407 Station 62+60‐81+50 (Upper A2) 766
SBKF = ‐0.0042x + 791.29
764
762
Beaver Dam
760 SWS = ‐0.0038x + 786.14
758
756
754
752 6260
6460
6660 Baseline 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
6860 MY‐01 2010
7060 MY‐02 2011
7260 MY‐03 2013
7460 Structure
Bankfull Bankful
7660 Water Surface
7860
8060
BKF Slope
59
Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Valley Fields Farm EEP Project Number ‐ 407 Station 82+00‐98+00 (Lower A) 758
757 SBKF = ‐0.0015x + 769.25 756
Backwater from dam SWS = ‐0.0005x + 758.87
755
Beaver Dam 754
753
752
751
750
749 8200
8400
8600 Baseline 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
8800 MY‐01 2010
MY‐02 2011
9000 MY‐03 2013
9200 Bankfull Bankful
Water Surface
9400 BKF Slope
9600
9800
WS Slope
60
Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Valley Fields Farm EEP Project Number ‐ 407 Station 155+25 ‐ 158+25 (Upper B) 766
765 SBKF = ‐0.0052x + 846.33
764
763
SWS = ‐0.0036x + 818.31 762
761
760
759 15525
15575 Baseline 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
15625 MY‐01 2010
MY‐02 2011
15675 MY‐03 2013
Structures
15725 Bankfull Bankful
Water Surface
15775 BKF Slope
15825 WS Slope
61
Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Valley Fields Farm EEP Project Number ‐ 407 Station 167+25 ‐ 170+50 (Lower B) 762
SBKF = ‐0.0088x + 908.14 761
760
759
SWS = ‐0.0041x + 826.16
758
757
756
755 16725
16775 Baseline 2008
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
16825 MY‐01 2010
16875 MY‐02 2011
16925
MY‐03 2013
Structures
Bankfull Bankful
16975 Water Surface
BKF Slope
17025 WS Slope
62
Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Valley Fields Farm EEP Project Number ‐ 407 Station 100+00 ‐ 107+00 (Reach C) 780
778 SBKF = ‐0.0094x + 872.52
SWS = ‐0.0093x + 870.29 776
774
772
770
768 10000
10100 Baseline 2008
10200 MY‐01 2010
10300 MY‐02 2011
10400
MY‐03 2013
Structures
10500 Bankfull Bankful
Water Surface
10600 BKF Slope
10700
WS Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
63
Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Valley Fields Farm EEP Project Number ‐ 407 Station 107+00 ‐ 114+90 (Reach C) 772
770
SBKF = ‐0.0094x + 872.52
768 SWS = ‐0.0093x + 870.29
766
764
762
760 10700
10800 Baseline 2008
10900 MY‐01 2010
11000 MY‐02 2011
11100 MY‐03 2013
Structures
11200 Bankfull Bankful
11300 Water Surface
BKF Slope
11400 WS Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
64
Appendix D
PEBBLE COUNT PLOTS Cross-Section A1 Riffle - VFF MY-03
Cumulative Percent
Particle
Millimeter
Material
Count
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
10
10%
10%
1
Very Fine
.062 - .125
S
10
10%
20%
0.9
.125 - .25
A
10
10%
30%
0.8
.25 - .50
N
10
10%
40%
0.7
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
30
30%
70%
Very Coarse
1-2
S
20
20%
90%
Very Fine
2-4
10
10%
100%
Fine
4 - 5.7
G
0%
100%
Fine
5.7 - 8
R
0%
100%
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
0%
100%
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
0%
100%
Coarse
16 - 22.6
E
0%
100%
C umulative Percent
Fine Medium
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.01
Coarse
22.6 - 32
L
0%
100%
32 - 45
S
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45 - 64
0%
100%
Small
64 - 90
C
0%
100%
Small
90 - 128
O
0%
100%
1 0.9
0%
100%
100%
100%
>2048
100
Total Size (mm)
Type
D50
0.63
silt/clay
10%
D84
1.6
sand
80%
D95
2.8
gravel
10%
cobble
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
0.3 0.2 0.1 0
24
BDRK
Bedrock
0.4
23
100%
22
0%
21
R
20
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048
0.5
19
100%
18
0%
17
D
16
512 - 1024
0.6
15
Medium
MY-03
14
100%
13
0%
12
L
11
362 - 512
MY-02
10
Small
10000
0.7
9
100%
8
0%
7
B
6
256 - 362
5
Small
1000
0.8
4
100%
3
100%
0%
2
0%
L
100
Individual Class Percentage
1
B
180 - 256
10
MY-01
Individual C lass Percent
128 - 180
Large
1
Particle Size - Millimeters
Very Coarse
Large
0.1
Particel Size - Millimeters MY-03
65
Appendix D
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
10000
MY-03
Individual Class Percentage 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 24
23
22
0 21
Type silt/clay 0% sand 60% gravel 40% cobble 0%
MY-02
20
Size (mm) D50 1.6 D84 3.2 D95 4
MY-01
19
100%
100
1000
18
100%
Total
100
17
100%
10
16
0%
1
Particle Size - Millimeters
15
BDRK
0.1
14
100% 100% 100% 100%
0 0.01
13
0% 0% 0% 0%
0.1
12
B L D R
0.2
11
100% 100% 100% 100%
0.3
9
0% 0% 0% 0%
0.4
10
C O B L
0.5
8
64 - 90 90 - 128 128 - 180 180 - 256
0.6
7
Small Small Large Large
0.7
6
95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
35 5
0.8
5
G R A V E L S
>2048
35% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
S
5 20 35
1 0.9
4
2-4 4 - 5.7 5.7 - 8 8 - 11.3 11.3 - 16 16 - 22.6 22.6 - 32 32 - 45 45 - 64
Bedrock
0% 0% 5% 25% 60%
3
Very Fine Fine Fine Medium Medium Coarse Coarse Very Coarse Very Coarse
Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048
0% 0% 5% 20% 35%
S A N D
2
.062 - .125 .125 - .25 .25 - .50 .50 - 1 1-2
1
Very Fine Fine Medium Coarse Very Coarse
Cumulative Percent
Cum % 0%
Individual Class Percent
Cross-Section A2 Riffle - VFF MY-03 Millimeter Material Count Item % < 0.062 S/C 0%
Cumulative Percent
Particle Silt/Clay
Particel Size - Millimeters MY-03
66
Appendix D
Cross-Section A3 Riffle - VFF MY-03
Cumulative Percent
Cum %
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0%
1
.062 - .125
S
0%
0%
0.9
Fine
.125 - .25
A
0%
0%
0.8
Medium
.25 - .50
N
2
2%
2%
0.7
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
16
16%
18%
Very Coarse
1-2
S
31
31%
49%
Very Fine
2-4
36
36%
85%
Fine
4 - 5.7
G
10
10%
95%
Fine
5.7 - 8
R
5
5%
100%
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
0%
100%
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
0%
100%
Coarse
16 - 22.6
E
0%
100%
Cumulative Percent
Silt/Clay Very Fine
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.01
Coarse
22.6 - 32
L
0%
100%
32 - 45
S
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45 - 64
0%
100%
Small
64 - 90
C
0%
100%
Small
90 - 128
O
0%
100%
1 0.9
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048
R
0%
100%
BDRK
0%
100%
100%
100%
Bedrock
>2048
100
Total Size (mm)
Type
D50
2
silt/clay
0%
D84
3.9
sand
49%
D95
6
gravel
51%
cobble
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
24
100%
23
0%
22
D
21
512 - 1024
20
Medium
0.6
19
100%
18
0%
17
L
16
362 - 512
0.7
15
Small
10000
MY-03
14
100%
13
0%
12
B
11
256 - 362
MY-02
10
Small
1000
0.8
9
100%
8
100%
0%
7
0%
L
100
Individual Class Percentage
6
B
180 - 256
10
MY-01
Individual C lass Percent
128 - 180
Large
1
Particle Size - Millimeters
Very Coarse
Large
0.1
5
Item %
4
Count
3
Material
2
Millimeter
1
Particle
Particel Size - Millimeters MY-03
67
Appendix D
Cross-Section A10 Riffle - VFF MY-03
Cumulative Percent
Cum %
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0%
1
.062 - .125
S
10
10%
10%
0.9
Fine
.125 - .25
A
10
10%
20%
0.8
Medium
.25 - .50
N
10
10%
30%
0.7
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
0%
30%
Very Coarse
1-2
S
26
26%
56%
Very Fine
2-4
27
27%
83%
Fine
4 - 5.7
G
10
10%
93%
Fine
5.7 - 8
R
3
3%
96%
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
3
3%
99%
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
1
1%
100%
Coarse
16 - 22.6
E
0%
100%
C umulative Percent
Silt/Clay Very Fine
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.01
Coarse
22.6 - 32
L
0%
100%
32 - 45
S
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45 - 64
0%
100%
Small
64 - 90
C
0%
100%
Small
90 - 128
O
0%
100%
1 0.9
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048
R
0%
100%
BDRK
0%
100%
100%
100%
Bedrock
>2048
100
Total Size (mm)
Type
D50
1.7
silt/clay
0%
D84
4.2
sand
56%
D95
7.3
gravel
44%
cobble
0%
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
24
100%
23
0%
22
D
21
512 - 1024
20
Medium
0.6
19
100%
18
0%
17
L
16
362 - 512
0.7
15
Small
10000
MY-03
14
100%
13
0%
12
B
11
256 - 362
MY-02
10
Small
1000
0.8
9
100%
8
100%
0%
7
0%
L
100
Individual Class Percentage
6
B
180 - 256
10
MY-01
Individual Class Percent
128 - 180
Large
1
Particle Size - Millimeters
Very Coarse
Large
0.1
5
Item %
4
Count
3
Material
2
Millimeter
1
Particle
Particel Size - Millimeters MY-03
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
68
Appendix D
Cross-Section B1 Riffle - VFF MY-03
Cumulative Percent
Cum %
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0%
1
.062 - .125
S
0%
0%
0.9
Fine
.125 - .25
A
2
2%
2%
0.8
Medium
.25 - .50
N
3
3%
5%
0.7
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
21
20%
25%
Very Coarse
1-2
S
37
36%
61%
Very Fine
2-4
34
33%
93%
Fine
4 - 5.7
G
4
4%
97%
Fine
5.7 - 8
R
2
2%
99%
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
1
1%
100%
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
0%
100%
Coarse
16 - 22.6
E
0%
100%
C umulative Percent
Silt/Clay Very Fine
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.01
Coarse
22.6 - 32
L
0%
100%
32 - 45
S
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45 - 64
0%
100%
Small
64 - 90
C
0%
100%
Small
90 - 128
O
0%
100%
1 0.9
100%
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048
R
0%
100%
BDRK
0%
100%
100%
100%
>2048
104
Total Size (mm)
Type
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1
Bedrock
0.5
D50
1.6
silt/clay
0%
D84
3.3
sand
61%
D95
4.8
gravel
39%
cobble
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
24
0%
23
D
22
512 - 1024
21
Medium
0.6
20
100%
19
0%
18
L
17
362 - 512
0.7
16
Small
10000
MY-03
15
100%
14
0%
13
B
12
256 - 362
1000
0.8
11
Small
MY-02
10
100%
9
100%
0%
8
0%
L
100
Individual Class Percentage
7
B
180 - 256
10
MY-01
Individual C lass Percent
128 - 180
Large
1
Particle Size - Millimeters
Very Coarse
Large
0.1
6
Item %
5
Count
4
Material
3
Millimeter
2
Particle
Particel Size - Millimeters MY-03
69
Appendix D
Individual Class Percentage 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 24
23
0 22
Type silt/clay 0% sand 54% gravel 30% cobble 9%
10000
MY-03
21
Size (mm) D50 1.8 D84 45 D95 110
MY-02
20
100%
100
MY-01
19
100%
Total
1000
18
100%
100
17
0%
10
16
BDRK
1
Particle Size - Millimeters
15
100% 100% 100% 100%
0.1
14
0% 0% 0% 0%
0 0.01
13
B L D R
0.1
12
93% 97% 99% 100%
0.2
11
2% 4% 2% 1%
0.3
9
2 4 2 1
0.4
10
C O B L
0.5
8
64 - 90 90 - 128 128 - 180 180 - 256
0.6
7
Small Small Large Large
0.7
6
68% 71% 72% 72% 73% 75% 78% 84% 91%
14 3 1
0.8
5
G R A V E L S
>2048
1 2 3 6 7
14% 3% 1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 6% 7%
S
15 18 21
1 0.9
4
2-4 4 - 5.7 5.7 - 8 8 - 11.3 11.3 - 16 16 - 22.6 22.6 - 32 32 - 45 45 - 64
Bedrock
0% 0% 15% 33% 54%
3
Very Fine Fine Fine Medium Medium Coarse Coarse Very Coarse Very Coarse
Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048
0% 0% 15% 18% 21%
S A N D
2
.062 - .125 .125 - .25 .25 - .50 .50 - 1 1-2
1
Very Fine Fine Medium Coarse Very Coarse
Cumulative Percent
Cum % 0%
Individual Class Percent
Cross-Section C3 Riffle - VFF MY-03 Millimeter Material Count Item % < 0.062 S/C 0%
Cumulative Percent
Particle Silt/Clay
Particel Size - Millimeters MY-03
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
70
Appendix D
TABLE 10. BASELINE STREAM DATA SUMMARY TABLE Table 10a.1 Baseline Stream Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Upper A: 800 feet Gauge2
Parameter Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Regional Curve LL UL Eq. 20.502 22.66 21.581
Pre-Existing Condition Min
Mean
2.2206 2.4544 2.3375
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
52.257 57.758 55.008
Bank Height Ratio
Med 18.2 20.8 1.7
Max
Reference Reach(es) Data 5
n 1 1 1
SD
Min 5.7 23.3 0.5
Mean 10.1 53.033 0.9
Med 9.4 49.9 1
Max 15.2 85.9 1.2
5
SD
Design n 3 3 3
Min
Med 30 66 1.9
Monitoring Baseline Max
Min 29.1 90 1.6
Mean 30.05 90.7 1.85
Med
5
Max 31 91.4 2.1
SD
n 2 2 2
1.9
1
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.9
2.8
3
3.2
2
30.9 10.7 1.1
1 1 1
2.7 9.4 1.5
10.2 11.167 6.4667
8.9 11.4 8.8
19 12.7 9.1
3 3 3
57.5 15.8 2.2
50.1 14.2 3
55.1 16.65 3
60.1 19.1 3
2 2 2
2.8
1
1.1
1.3333
1.4
1.5
3
1
1
1
1
2
120.4 0.0034 98.5 5.1 340.6
1 1 3 3 2
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
0.0026 0.003 2.6 30
2.6 42
0.0033
2
0.0061 0.0337 0.0173 0.0961 0.0361
6
2.6 77
1 2
0.9 15.3
1.9 31.7
1.4 31.6
3.9 52.4
1.13 13.8
6 6
3 3 3 3 3
43.2 16.4 1.7 44.7 7.6
79.2 29.5 4.1 141.3 10.9
84.3 22 3.7 114 11.2
105.1 51 6.8 320.6 15.5
26.1 14.7 1.7 106.5 3.1
4 5 6 6 5
56.5 88.5 0.0031 0.0031 0.0064 0.0034 0.0034 38.5 74.1 2.5 3.8 4.8 3.72 4.21 120 120 150 155.7 248.2
Pattern 36 17 0.9341 76 4.1758
Channel Beltwidth (ft) Radius of Curvature (ft) Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) Meander Width Ratio
59 79 72 248 3.956 13.626 143 196 7.8571 10.769
201 60 2 240 8
229 90 3 300 10
256 120 4 360 12
22.1 10.1 0.3 117 4.0
118.1 45.7 1.5 302.2 10.1
126 49.2 292..4
197.2 79.8 2.6 613.9 19.8
71.914 28.527 1.1141 251.12 7.9637
Transport parameters 2
0.31824 23.64698193 45.2088
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Bankfull Velocity (fps) Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Valley length (ft) Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3
4.1722 4.6114 4.3918 229.5 253.66 241.58
0.560976 42.68793974 46.71576
0.386724 28.97191657 50.48316
G5c/F5 6.9 213.1
B4/E5/C4
B5c/C5 4.2
C5 4.382940109
1.1 0.003 0.003
1.1-1.3 0.0080-0.0215 0.0082-0.0522
1.2 0.0028 0.0031
0.0029 0.0024
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
71
4 5 6 6 5
Appendix D
Table 10a.2 Baseline Stream Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Upper A2: 1,850 feet Gauge2
Parameter Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Regional Curve LL UL Eq. 20.502 22.66 21.581 2.2206 2.4544 2.3375
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
52.257 57.758 55.008
Bank Height Ratio
Pre-Existing Condition Min 14.6 23.7 2.7
Mean 16.55 75.25 2.75
Med
Max 18.5 126.8 2.8
Reference Reach(es) Data 5
n 2 2 2
SD
Min 5.7 23.3 0.5
Mean 10.1 53.033 0.9
Med 9.4 49.9 1
Max 15.2 85.9 1.2
5
SD
Design n 3 3 3
Min
Med 30 66 1.9
Monitoring Baseline Max
Min 30.1 78.6 1.8
Mean 30.8 98.6 2
Med
5
Max 31.1 126.6 2.2
SD
n 3 3 3
3.4
3.45
3.5
2
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.9
3.2
3.5
4
3
40.4 5.2 1.6
45 6.05 4.25
49.6 6.9 6.9
2 2 2
2.7 9.4 1.5
10.2 11.167 6.4667
8.9 11.4 8.8
19 12.7 9.1
3 3 3
57.5 15.8 2.2
55.2 14 2.5
62.2 15.3 3.2
69 16.4 4.1
3 3 3
1.5
1.8
2.1
2
1.1
1.3333
1.4
1.5
3
1
1
1
1
3
86.3 0.0135 238.6 5.94 300.6
3 5 3 11 5
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
0.0026 0.003 0.0044 0.0033 0.0008 2.5 30
2.8 42
2.6 53.7
3.2 77
59.2 58.5 3.7 58.5 3.6
79 248 17 228 5.4
4
0.0061 0.0337 0.0173 0.0961 0.0361
6
3 3
0.9 15.3
1.9 31.7
1.4 31.6
3.9 52.4
1.13 13.8
6 6
6 6 6 6 6
43.2 16.4 1.7 44.7 7.6
79.2 29.5 4.1 141.3 10.9
84.3 22 3.7 114 11.2
105.1 51 6.8 320.6 15.5
26.1 14.7 1.7 106.5 3.1
4 5 6 6 5
33.3 52 0.0031 0.0031 0.0064 0.0016 0.0086 60.8 110.4 2.5 3.8 4.8 4.15 5.03 120 120 150 142.7 238
Pattern 36 60 14 87.4 0.8459 5.3 58 139.8 2.5 3.6
Channel Beltwidth (ft) Radius of Curvature (ft) Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) Meander Width Ratio
16 87.4 6 65.9 1.1
201 60 2 240 8
229 90 3 300 10
256 120 4 360 12
22.1 10.1 0.3 117 3.9
118.1 45.7 1.5 302.2 9.8
126 49.2 292..4
197.2 79.8 2.6 613.9 19.7
71.914 28.527 1.1153 251.12 8.0101
Transport parameters 2
0.5148 39.03306101 45.2088
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Bankfull Velocity (fps) Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Valley length (ft) Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3
4.1722 4.6114 4.3918 229.5 253.66 241.58
0.560976 42.68793974 46.71576
1.07328 83.92826353 129.59856
G5/Incised E5 4.9-5.7 241.1
B4/E5/C4
B5c/C5 4.2
C5 3.882636656
1.0-1.1 0.0025-0.0040 0.0030-0.0035
1.1-1.3 0.0080-0.0215 0.0082-0.0522
1.2 0.0028 0.0031
0.0036 0.0036
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
72
Appendix D
Table 10a.3 Baseline Stream Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Lower A: 1,400 feet Gauge2
Parameter Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Regional Curve LL UL Eq. 25.261 27.921 26.591
Pre-Existing Condition Min
Mean
2.5939 2.8669 2.7304
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
72.699 80.351 76.525
Bank Height Ratio
Med 45.1 63.3 2
Max
Reference Reach(es) Data 5
n 1 1 1
SD
Min 5.7 23.3 0.5
Mean 10.1 53.033 0.9
Med 9.4 49.9 1
Max 15.2 85.9 1.2
5
SD
Design n 3 3 3
Min
Med 30 66 1.9
Monitoring Baseline Max
Min 30.1 78.6 1.8
Mean 30.8 98.6 2
Med
5
Max 31.1 126.6 2.2
SD
n 3 3 3
3.5
1
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.9
3.2
3.5
4
3
91.3 22.6 1.4
1 1 1
2.7 9.4 1.5
10.2 11.167 6.4667
8.9 11.4 8.8
19 12.7 9.1
3 3 3
57.5 15.8 2.2
55.2 14 2.5
62.2 15.3 3.2
69 16.4 4.1
3 3 3
1.7
1
1.1
1.3333
1.4
1.5
3
1
1
1
1
3
51.6 0.0135 152.8 5.94 300.6
3 5 3 11 5
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
0.0075 0.0089 4 53
4.6 104
0.0102
2
0.0061 0.0337 0.0173 0.0961 0.0361
6
5.3 156
2 2
0.9 15.3
1.9 31.7
1.4 31.6
3.9 52.4
1.13 13.8
6 6
6 6 6 6 6
43.2 16.4 1.7 44.7 7.6
79.2 29.5 4.1 141.3 10.9
84.3 22 3.7 114 11.2
105.1 51 6.8 320.6 15.5
26.1 14.7 1.7 106.5 3.1
4 5 6 6 5
36.8 44.4 0.0031 0.0031 0.0064 0.0016 0.0086 89.6 119.8 2.5 3.8 4.8 4.15 5.03 120 120 150 142.7 238
Pattern 36 14 2 58 2.5
Channel Beltwidth (ft) Radius of Curvature (ft) Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) Meander Width Ratio
60 87.4 5.3 139.8 3.6
59.2 58.5 3.7 58.5 3.6
79 248 17 228 5.4
16 87.4 6 65.9 1.1
201 60 2 240 8
229 90 3 300 10
256 120 4 360 12
22.1 10.1 0.3 117 3.9
118.1 45.7 1.5 302.2 9.8
126 49.2 292..4
197.2 79.8 2.6 613.9 19.7
71.914 28.527 1.1153 251.12 8.0101
Transport parameters 2
1.11072 86.98116865 134.11944
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Bankfull Velocity (fps) Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Valley length (ft) Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3
4.2541 4.7019 4.478 325.54 359.81 342.68
0.560976 42.68793974 46.71576
1.07328 83.92826353 129.59856
G5/Incised E5 4.9-5.7 241.1
B4/E5/C4
B5c/C5 4.2
C5 3.882636656
1.0-1.1 0.0025-0.0040 0.0030-0.0035
1.1-1.3 0.0080-0.0215 0.0082-0.0522
1.2 0.0028 0.0031
0.0015 0.002
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
73
Appendix D
Table 10a.4 Baseline Stream Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Upper B: 200 feet Gauge2
Parameter Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Regional Curve LL UL Eq. 15.54 17.176 16.358 1.8069 1.9971 1.902
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
33.717 37.267 35.492
Bank Height Ratio
Pre-Existing Condition Min 14.3 20 1.9
Mean 15.4 20.8 2.1
Med
Max 16.4 21.6 2.2
Reference Reach(es) Data 5
n 2 2 2
SD
Min 5.7 23.3 0.5
Mean 10.1 53.033 0.9
Med 9.4 49.9 1
Max 15.2 85.9 1.2
5
SD
Design n 3 3 3
Min
Med 27.5 60.5 1.6
Monitoring Baseline Max
Min
Mean
Med 21.4 88.1 2
Max
5
SD
n 1 1 1
2.5
2.7
2.8
2
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.3
3.1
1
27.1 7.3 1.3
31.7 7.4 1.4
36.2 7.5 1.4
2 2 2
2.7 9.4 1.5
10.2 11.167 6.4667
8.9 11.4 8.8
19 12.7 9.1
3 3 3
43.1 17.5 2.2
42.4 10.8 4.1
1 1 1
2.6
2.8
3
2
1.1
1.3333
1.4
1.5
3
1
1
1
0.0181
2
6
0.0039
18.4 0.0005
3.2 61
2 2
0.9 15.3
1.9 31.7
1.4 31.6
3.9 52.4
1.13 13.8
6 6
2 110
3.2 110
3.9 138
1 1 2 2 1
75 226 14.7 672 43.6
3 3 3 3 3
43.2 16.4 1.7 44.7 7.6
79.2 29.5 4.1 141.3 10.9
84.3 22 3.7 114 11.2
105.1 51 6.8 320.6 15.5
26.1 14.7 1.7 106.5 3.1
4 5 6 6 5
101 55 2 220 8
109 83 3.0182 275 10
120 110 4 330 12
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
0.0053 0.0131 2.8 31
3 42
0.0061 0.0337 0.0173 0.0961 0.0361
41.1 3.23
41.6 3.24
42.2 3.24 107.5
Pattern 29 15 1 108 7
Channel Beltwidth (ft) Radius of Curvature (ft) Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) Meander Width Ratio
50 105.67 6.8667 358.67 23.267
46 76 4.9 296 19.2
108.7 23.8
170.8 55.4
148.2
327.6
164.6 50.5 2.4 266.7 12.5
261..6 34.204 110.1 36.202 621
201.06
Transport parameters 2
1.716624 136.9105109 197.41176
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Bankfull Velocity (fps) Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Valley length (ft) Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3
4.0661 4.4941 4.2801 144.31 159.5 151.91
0.559728 42.58898812 58.77144
0.067392 4.691537038 8.137584
G5/Incised E5 4.5-5.6 162.7
B4/E5/C4
B5c/C5 4.2
E5 3.837264151
1.1 0.0046 0.0131
1.1-1.3 0.0080-0.0215 0.0082-0.0522
1.1 0.0039 0.0047
Flat 0.0047
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
74
4 5 6 6 5
Appendix D
Table 10a.5 Baseline Stream Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Lower B: 230 feet Gauge2
Parameter Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Regional Curve LL UL Eq. 16.16 17.861 17.011 1.8602 2.056 1.9581
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
35.869 39.645 37.757
Bank Height Ratio
Pre-Existing Condition Min 14.3 20 1.9
Mean 15.4 20.8 2.1
Med
Max 16.4 21.6 2.2
Reference Reach(es) Data 5
n 2 2 2
SD
Min 5.7 23.3 0.5
Mean 10.1 53.033 0.9
Med 9.4 49.9 1
Max 15.2 85.9 1.2
5
SD
Design n 3 3 3
Min
Med 27.5 60.5 1.6
Monitoring Baseline Max
Min
Mean
Med 48.4 91.3 1.4
5
Max
SD
n 1 1 1
2.5
2.7
2.8
2
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.3
2.9
1
27.1 7.3 1.3
31.7 7.4 1.4
36.2 7.5 1.4
2 2 2
2.7 9.4 1.5
10.2 11.167 6.4667
8.9 11.4 8.8
19 12.7 9.1
3 3 3
43.1 17.5 2.2
67.8 34.5 1.9
1 1 1
2.6
2.8
3
2
1.1
1.3333
1.4
1.5
3
1
1
1
0.0181
2
6
0.0039
3.2 61
2 2
0.9 15.3
1.9 31.7
1.4 31.6
3.9 52.4
1.13 13.8
6 6
75 226 14.7 672 43.6
3 3 3 3 3
43.2 16.4 1.7 44.7 7.6
79.2 29.5 4.1 141.3 10.9
84.3 22 3.7 114 11.2
105.1 51 6.8 320.6 15.5
26.1 14.7 1.7 106.5 3.1
4 5 6 6 5
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
0.0053 0.0131 2.8 31
3 42
0.0061 0.0337 0.0173 0.0961 0.0361
2 110
3.2 110
14 25.5 0.0027 0.0067 19.1 20.3 3.9 138
40.2 0.0087 21.5
2 2 2 1 1
261..6 34.204 110.1 36.202
4 5 6 6 5
4.1 88.9
Pattern 29 15 1 108 7
Channel Beltwidth (ft) Radius of Curvature (ft) Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) Meander Width Ratio
50 105.67 6.8667 358.67 23.267
46 76 4.9 296 19.2
97 106 122 108.7 57 85 114 23.8 2.0727 3.0909 4.1455 227 284 341 148.2 8.2545 10.327 12.4
170.8 55.4 327.6
164.6 50.5 1.0 266.7 5.5
621
201.06
Transport parameters 2
1.716624 136.9105109 197.41176
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Bankfull Velocity (fps) Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Valley length (ft) Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3
4.0809 4.5105 4.2957 154.08 170.3 162.19
0.559728 42.58898812 58.77144
0.5826912 44.41116115 100.514232
G5/Incised E5 4.5-5.6 162.7
B4/E5/C4
B5c/C5 4.2
B5 2.399705015
1.1 0.0046 0.0131
1.1-1.3 0.0080-0.0215 0.0082-0.0522
1.1 0.0039 0.0047
0.0035 0.0047
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
75
Appendix D
Table 10a.6 Baseline Stream Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Reach C: 1,400 feet Gauge2
Parameter Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Regional Curve LL UL Eq. 5.1366 5.6773 5.407 0.7927 0.8762 0.8345
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
5.8553 6.4716 6.1634
Bank Height Ratio
Pre-Existing Condition Min
Mean
Med 7 14.1 0.6
Max
Reference Reach(es) Data 5
n 1 1 1
SD
Min 5.7 23.3 0.5
Mean 10.1 53.033 0.9
Med 9.4 49.9 1
Max 15.2 85.9 1.2
5
SD
Design n 3 3 3
Min
Med 11.5 25.3 0.7
Monitoring Baseline Max
Min 8.9 39.6 0.6
Mean 12.133 45.6 0.8333
Med 13.5 48.5 0.9
Max 14 48.7 1
5
SD
n 3 3 3
0.9
1
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
1.2
1.1
1.5333
1.7
1.8
3
3.3 11.7 2
1 1 1
2.7 9.4 1.5
10.2 11.167 6.4667
8.9 11.4 8.8
19 12.7 9.1
3 3 3
7.8 17.2 2.2
7.5 8.9 3.5
9.6 16.267 3.8333
8.9 15.9 3.6
12.4 24 4.4
3 3 3
1
1
1.1
1.3333
1.4
1.5
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
6
0.0086
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
0.0061 0.0337 0.0173 0.0961 0.0361 0.9 15.3
1.9 31.7
1.4 31.6
3.9 52.4
1.13 13.8
6 6
0.9 45
1.5 69
1.7 92
43.2 16.4 1.7 44.7 7.6
79.2 29.5 4.1 141.3 10.9
84.3 22 3.7 114 11.2
105.1 51 6.8 320.6 15.5
26.1 14.7 1.7 106.5 3.1
4 5 6 6 5
33 23 2 92 8
46 35 3.0435 115 10
58 46 4 138 12
21.7 41.6 36.7 90.8 23.5 0.0017 0.0066 0.0082 0.0104 0.0035 25.8 50.2 56.4 66.7 16.7 2.18 2.52 2.58 2.78 0.25 46 92.5 91.9 152.2 37.9
7 7 6 7 9
Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) Radius of Curvature (ft) Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) Meander Width Ratio
84.1 20.8 2.3 72.5 8.1
97.4 32.5 2.7 187.8 15.5
96.4 30.7 2.3 131.2 9.7
112 59.4 4.2 595.1 42.5
11.417 16.521 0.9237 237.02 16.01
Transport parameters 2
0.643968 49.28807318 129.59856
0.370656 27.71871363 123.57072
B4/E5/C4
C5/E5 3.1
E5 18.28089888
1.1-1.3 0.0080-0.0215 0.0082-0.0522
1.1 0.0066 0.0086
0.0099 0.0095
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Bankfull Velocity (fps) Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Valley length (ft) Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3
3.6682 4.0543 3.8612 22.609 24.989 23.799
Incised B5 6.5 21.6
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
76
4 5 6 6 5
Appendix D
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Valley Fields Farm/407 Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design
Parameter 1
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
10
40
0
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
16
1.18 69.41 29.41
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.6
0.93
Entrenchment Class 10
800
0
0
0
1
Upper A (800 feet)
1
2
3
Incision Class 2.0
Parameter 1
6.49
9.96
0
0
0
200
600
10
10
20
60
0
14
60
26
0
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.09
0.65
1.25
6.16
11.3
Entrenchment Class 10 1500 3 Incision Class 2.0 0
350
0
0
0
0 1000
850
Parameter
2.85
31.7 59.76
0.43
2.25 12.08 39.69 71.35
1
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
5
10
5
80
0
8.33
33.3
58.3
0
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.19
1.5
2.62
8.88
11.3
Entrenchment Class 10
100
900
400
0
0
0 1200
200
1
3
Incision Class 2.0
0
Parameter 1
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
10
10
30
50
0
0
19
81
0
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
1.81
4
Entrenchment Class 10
430
0
0
0
0
0
0
430
1
3
Incision Class 2.0
Parameter
2.85
31.7 59.76
0.43
2.25 12.08 39.69 71.35
1
Reach C (1,400 feet)
4.06
X
0.82
2.85
31.7 59.76
4.06
0.43
2.25 12.08 39.69 71.35 X
0.82
600 Incision Class 2.0 1000
3
0.43
2.25 12.08 39.69 71.35 X
0.82
5.67
7.49 0
0
0
0
10
0
300 0
30
10
31.7 59.76
4.06
0.82
0.43
2.25 12.08 39.69 71.35 X
40
20
0
0
0
0
0 1850
1850
0
0
0
40
20
As-built/Baseline 0
30
10
40
20
0
0 1400
0
0
0
0
10
40
20
0
As-built/Baseline 0
30
10
40
20
0
0
0
430
0
430
0
0
0
0
0.81
X
2.85
X X
0 0
Design
Reference Reach(es) Data
0
500
0
0.81
30 4.06
0
0
0
31.7 59.76
20
0
Design
Design 30
0
20
X
0
400
40
X
2.85
40
800
1400
0
0
800
10
Reference Reach(es) Data
0
10
As-built/Baseline
X
30 0
30
0.81
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
Entrenchment Class 10
0
Design
Reference Reach(es) Data
Pre-Existing Condition
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% 18.63 34.31 47.06 1 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm) 0.05 1.17 1.86
20
X
30 0
7.01 22.23 29.83
1
40
X
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
Reach B (430 feet)
10
0.81
Reference Reach(es) Data
Pre-Existing Condition
1
0.82
X
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
Lower A (1,400 feet)
4.06
X
Pre-Existing Condition
1
2
30 0
X
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
1
2
1.35
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
Upper A2 (1,850 feet)
2
30
Pre-Existing Condition
1
2
20
As-built/Baseline
10
40
20
As-built/Baseline 0
30
10
40
20
0
0 1000
400
0
0.81
0 1400
0
0
0
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave 2 = Entrenchment Class - Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as visual estimates 3 = Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as the longitudinal profile
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
77
Appendix D
TABLE 11. MONITORING MORPHOLOGY DATA TABLE Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections) Valley Fields Farm/407 Cross Section A1 (Riffle) 1 Base Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation Record elevation (datum) used 760.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
MY1
MY2
MY3
760.8
760.8
760.8
MY4
MY5
Cross Section A2 (Riffle) MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
760.7
760.7
760.7
MY4
MY5
Cross Section A3 (Riffle) MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
760.7
762.0
762.0
762.0
MY4
MY5
Cross Section A4 (Pool) MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
762.0
764.0
764.0
764.0
MY4
MY5
Cross Section A5 (Riffle) MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
764.0
765.7
765.7
765.7
765.7
31.1
33.3
37.3
23.6
38.2
30.8
37.1
23.6
30.1
33.4
29.7
23.1
31.1
27.5
32.0
19.4
31.0
29.9
23.2
16.6
Floodprone Width (ft) >120
>120
>120
>120
>100
>100
>100
>100
>90
>90
>90
>90
-
-
-
-
>90
>90
>90
>90 2.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
2.3
2.1
2.7
1.9
3.0
1.9
2.9
1.8
1.7
2.0
2.4
2.2
2.8
2.4
3.5
1.6
1.2
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.4
5.2
5.6
5.5
4.0
5.7
4.6
4.6
3.2
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.0
5.2
5.1
4.3
2.8
3.1
2.9
3.0
76.4
79.1
64.2
72.8
92.8
69.1
67.7
55.2
57.4
59.5
54.6
69.0
75.9
78.2
68.5
50.1
35.5
35.3
33.4 8.3
2 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) 62.5 Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 15.5
14.6
17.6
8.7
20.1
10.2
19.9
8.2
16.4
19.4
14.8
10.1
-
-
-
-
19.1
25.1
15.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.1
3.8
3.4
5.1
2.9
3.6
3.0
4.2
3.0
2.7
3.1
3.9
-
-
-
-
3.0
3.1
4.0
5.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
156.0
199.5
190.2
154.0
176.0
193.1
185.8
149.0
154.0
189.6
162.1
165.0
184.0
215.4
187.0
133.0
114.0
125.7
136.9
6.7
1.4
0.6
15.3
1.4
1.6
15.6
26.6
2.0 Base
MY1
2 Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft ) 147.0 d50 (mm)
Cross Section A6 (Riffle) 1 Base Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation Record elevation (datum) used 766.9
MY1
MY2
MY3
766.9
766.9
MY4
MY5
Cross Section A7 (Pool) MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
766.9
767.0
767.0
767.0
MY4
MY5
Cross Section A10 (Riffle) MY+
MY4
MY5
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY+
MY2
MY3
767.0
755.5
755.5
755.5
755.5
754.9
754.9
754.9
754.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
38.3
34.7
26.2
20.2
29.1
27.2
27.4
16.3
41.3
47.1
42.9
35.0
72.2
41.6
41.5
26.1
>90
>90
>90
>90
-
-
-
-
>90
>90
>90
>90
>90
>90
>90
>90
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
2.2
2.6
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.7
2.3
2.3
1.7
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.5
1.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.7
4.7
3.4
3.2
3.9
4.0
3.6
4.0
3.8
3.8
3.6
5.1
3.5
3.6
3.1
75.6
68.7
45.4
60.1
54.8
54.7
43.2
95.5
85.4
74.0
69.3
137.4
74.6
61.4
44.9 15.2
16.0
10.0
9.0
-
-
-
-
17.9
26.0
24.8
17.7
38.0
23.1
28.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.4
3.2
4.5
-
-
-
-
2.8
2.3
2.9
2.6
1.8
2.5
2.6
3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
172.0
200.0
166.7
168.0
162.0
189.1
166.9
448.0
440.0
456.7
455.2
596.0
539.0
565.0
547.9
Base
MY1
2 Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft ) 166.0 d50 (mm)
MY1
MY2
MY3
766.1
766.1
766.1
MY4
MY5
Cross Section B2 (Riffle) MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
765.9
765.9
765.9
765.9
MY4
MY5
Cross Section B3 (Riffle) MY+
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
MY2
MY3
760.7
760.7
760.7
760.7
760.4
760.4
760.4
760.4 19.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
21.4
36.4
22.8
24.3
35.7
34.3
33.7
27.5
48.4
44.4
22.1
23.1
44.1
38.3
27.9
88.1
98.7
88.6
89.9
106.1
106.7
99.6
97.2
91.3
93.7
96.5
90.8
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
2.4
2.4
1.9
2.4
2.3
2.3
1.4
1.2
2.0
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.6
2.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.1
4.3
3.1
3.2
4.0
4.0
3.4
3.1
2.9
3.2
3.5
3.2
3.2
2.8
2.8
3.0
66.6
54.7
58.0
67.7
81.5
75.9
62.1
67.8
55.3
44.0
37.5
57.7
49.1
43.8
35.6 -
19.9
9.5
10.2
18.8
14.4
15.0
12.2
34.5
35.8
11.1
14.2
-
-
-
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.1
2.7
3.9
3.7
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.5
1.9
2.1
4.4
3.9
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
619.0
574.2
616.2
690.0
718.0
638.3
688.0
582.0
571.0
549.2
563.8
479.0
431.0
444.3
433.3
1.4
1.6
1.6 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
774.0
774.0
774.0
769.2
769.2
769.2
769.2
767.4
767.4
767.4
767.4
2 Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft ) 586.0 d50 (mm)
Cross Section C1 (Riffle) Base Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1 Record elevation (datum) used 775.3
MY4
MY5
Cross Section C2 (Pool)
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY+
775.3
775.3
775.3
774.0
MY4
MY5
Cross Section C3 (Riffle) MY+
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.0
11.7
7.6
5.8
12.9
5.9
5.5
5.2
13.5
14.1
19.0
5.8
8.9
11.2
11.9
4.6
48.5
50.4
48.0
46.0
59.2
54.5
71.3
-
48.7
48.7
48.7
43.4
39.6
40.8
41.5
38.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.4
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.7
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
2.1
1.5
1.6
2.0
1.9
2.0
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.7
2.6
2.4
1.7
9.1
6.1
5.6
12.0
6.3
7.6
3.3
7.5
5.7
8.4
3.9
8.9
9.4
10.2
5.1
14.9
9.4
6.0
13.9
5.5
4.0
-
24.0
34.4
43.3
8.6
8.9
13.3
13.8
4.1 8.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
4.3
6.3
6.2
4.6
9.3
12.9
-
3.6
3.5
2.6
7.5
4.4
3.7
3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
199.0
238.1
241.9
53.0
52.0
53.5
52.1
39.0
33.0
60.7
51.9
142.0
133.0
165.1
102.7
8.6
57.0
1.8
2 Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft ) 199.0 d50 (mm)
MY5
MY+
MY4
MY5
MY+
Cross Section C4 (Riffle) MY+
Floodprone Width (ft)
2 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) 12.4 Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 15.9
MY4
Cross Section B4 (Pool)
Base
Floodprone Width (ft)
2 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) 42.4 Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.8
MY+
1.7
Cross Section B1 (Riffle) Base Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1 Record elevation (datum) used 766.1
MY5
Cross Section A11 (Riffle)
Base
Floodprone Width (ft)
2 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) 71.0 Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 20.6
MY4
MY4
MY5
MY+
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: “It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary.”
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
78
Appendix D
Exhibit Table 11b.1 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Upper A: 800 feet Baseline
Parameter Min Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Bankfull Width (ft) 29.1 Floodprone Width (ft) 90.0 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.6 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.8
Mean 30.1 90.7 1.9 3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 50.1 Width/Depth Ratio 14.2 Entrenchment Ratio 3.0 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0
55.1 16.7 3.0 1.0 88.5 0.003 74.1 4.2 248.2
Med
Max 31.0 91.4 2.1 3.2
MY-1 SD4
n 2 2 2 2
Min 33.3 90.5 1.7 3.6
Mean 33.3 108.6 2.0 4.4
60.1 19.1 3.0 1.0
2 2 2 2
57.4 14.6 2.7 1.0
66.9 17.0 3.3 1.0
120.4 0.003 98.5 5.1 340.6
1 1 3 3 2
21.7 0.003 36.9 3.3 80.2
63.7 0.004 72.0 4.0 102.9
Med
MY-2 Max 33.4 126.7 2.3 5.2
SD4
Med
MY- 3
n 2 2 2 2
Min 23.2 83.2 1.5 2.9
Mean 25.6 87.5 2.0 3.9
Max 27.4 91.5 2.6 4.7
76.4 19.4 3.8 1.0
2 2 2 2
35.3 10.0 3.2 1.0
52.9 13.0 3.4 1.0
68.7 15.2 4.0 1.0
105.7 0.004 95.9 4.5 134.0
2 2 2 3 3
14.9 0.006 47.5 2.1 48.4
30.0 0.011 103.2 2.6 122.4
52.1 0.014 164.8 3.2 179.7
SD4
n 3 3 3 3
Min 16.6 >90 2.0 3.0
Mean 18.4 >90 2.1 3.2
3 3 3 3
33.4 8.3 4.5 1.0
39.4 8.7 5.0 1.0
Med
Max 20.0 >90 2.2 3.4
MY- 4 SD4
45.4 9.0 5.4 1.0
n 2 2 2 2
Min
Mean
Med Max
MY- 5 SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
2 2 2 2
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
56.5 0.003 38.5 3.7 155.7
No identifiable riffles 5.8 10.1 1.4 1.6 464.9 464.9
14.4 1.7 464.9
2 2 1
Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) 22.1 Radius of Curvature (ft) 10.1 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 0.3 Meander Wavelength (ft) 117.0 Meander Width Ratio 4.0
118.1 126.0 197.2 71.9 45.7 49.2 79.8 28.5 1.5 2.6 1.1 302.2 292.4 613.9 206.7 10.1 19.8 8.0
4 5 6 6 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3 3
C5
C5
C5
C5
1.1 0.0029 0.0024
1.1 0.0025 0.002
1.1 0.0002 0.001
1.1 0.0017 0.001
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3%/61%/36%/0%/0%/0%
3
1.5/3.2/5.0
d50 / d84 / d95 /
2
4.1%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table 3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
79
Appendix D
Exhibit Table 11b.2 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Upper A2: 1,850 feet Baseline
Parameter Min Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Bankfull Width (ft) 30.1 Floodprone Width (ft) 78.6 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.8 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.2
Mean 30.8 98.6 2.0 3.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 55.2 Width/Depth Ratio 14.0 Entrenchment Ratio 2.5 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0
62.2 15.3 3.2 1.0 52.0 0.009 110.4 5.0 238.0
Med
Max 31.1 126.6 2.2 4.0
MY-1 SD4
n 3 3 3 3
Min 27.2 87.7 1.2 3.1
Mean 28.6 89.6 1.6 3.5
69.0 16.4 4.1 1.0
3 3 3 3
35.5 13.6 3.1 1.0
45.2 19.3 3.1 1.0
86.3 0.01 238.6 5.9 300.6
3 5 3 11 5
18.8 0.002 77.4 4.6 50.7
35.8 0.004 141.2 4.9 142.4
Med
MY-2 n 2 2 2 2
Min 29.7 78.6 1.9 3.8
Mean Med Max SD4 34.0 37.3 3.8 101.4 126.7 21.1 2.1 2.4 0.2 4.8 5.6 0.8
n 4 4 4 4
Min 23.1 >90 2.4 4.0
Mean 23.4 >90 2.7 4.7
54.8 25.1 3.2 1.0
2 2 2 2
59.5 13.1 2.5 1.0
71.5 16.4 3.0 1.0
79.1 19.9 3.4 1.0
4 4 4 4
54.6 8.2 3.9 1.0
62.2 9.0 4.4 1.0
52.8 0.005 405.4 5.4 244.4
3 5 3 11 5
5.5 0.006 14.0 1.9 38.2
19.2 0.07 50.9 3.1 122.3
45.6 0.2 84.7 4.7 249.5
Max 29.9 91.5 2.0 3.9
SD4
MY- 3
9.2 3.0 0.4 0.0
Med
Max 23.6 >90 2.9 5.5
MY- 4 SD4
n 3 3 3 3
67.7 10.1 5.1 1.0
3 3 3 3
18.0 0.008 28.7 6.9 4.9 1.1 212.4 47.8
1 1 11 11 10
Min
Mean
Med Max
MY- 5 SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
33.3 0.002 60.8 4.2 142.7
18.0 18.0 0.008 0.008 7.1 18.6 1.8 3.3 31.3 117.8
Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) 22.1 Radius of Curvature (ft) 10.1 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 0.3 Meander Wavelength (ft) 117.0 Meander Width Ratio 3.9
118.1 126.0 197.2 71.9 45.7 49.2 79.8 28.5 1.5 2.6 1.1 302.2 292.4 613.9 206.7 9.8 19.7 8.0
4 5 6 6 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3 3
C5
C5
C5
C5
1.18 0.0036 0.0036
1.18 0.004 0.004
1.18 0.0035 0.0036
1.18 0.0038 0.0042
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 3%/61%/36%/0%/0%/0%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% 3
1.5/3.2/5.0
d50 / d84 / d95 /
2
4.1%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table 3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
80
Appendix D
Exhibit Table 11b.3 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/447 - Lower A: 1,400 feet Baseline
Parameter
MY-1 SD4
Min Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Bankfull Width (ft) 30.1 Floodprone Width (ft) 78.6 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.8 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.2
Mean 30.8 98.6 2.0 3.5
Med 31.1 90.6 2.0 3.4
Max 31.1 126.6 2.2 4.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 55.2 Width/Depth Ratio 14.0 Entrenchment Ratio 2.5 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0
62.2 15.3 3.2 1.0
62.5 15.5 3.0 1.0
69.0 16.4 4.1 1.0
3 3 3 3
51.6 0.014 152.8 5.9 300.6
3 5 3 11 5
n 3 3 3 3
Min
Mean
Med 47.1 109.3 1.8 3.8 85.4 26.0 2.3 1.0
MY-2 Max
SD4
MY- 3
n 1 1 1 1
Min 27.4 87.8 1.7 3.8
Mean Med Max 35.1 42.9 105.4 122.9 1.9 2.0 3.9 4.0
1 1 1 1
54.7 13.7 2.9 1.0
64.4 19.2 3.0 1.0
74.0 24.8 3.2 1.0
25.1 0.002 30.7 0.9 54.0
63.2 0.006 58.4 1.2 126.7
118.2 0.017 97.7 2.1 288.6
SD4
n 2 2 2 2
Min 26.1 >90 1.7 3.1
Mean 30.6 >90 1.9 3.4
2 2 2 2
44.9 15.2 2.6 1.0
57.1 16.5 3.0 1.0
Med
Max 35.0 >90 2.0 3.6
MY- 4 SD4
69.3 17.7 3.4 1.0
n 2 2 2 2
Min
Mean
Med Max
MY- 5 SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
2 2 2 2
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
36.8 0.002 89.6 4.2 142.7
44.4 0.009 119.8 5.0 238.0
No identifiable riffles or pools
Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) 22.1 Radius of Curvature (ft) 10.1 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 0.3 Meander Wavelength (ft) 117.0 Meander Width Ratio
3.9
118.1 126.0 197.2 45.7 49.2 79.8 1.5 2.6
71.9 28.5 1.1
4 5 6
302.2 292..4 613.9 251.1
6
9.8
19.7
8.0
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
5
Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3 3
C5
C5
C5
C5
1.14 0.0015 0.002
1.14 0.0004 0.002
1.14 0.002 0.0012
1.14 0.0005 0.0015
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 3%/61%/36%/0%/0%/0%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% 3
1.5/3.2/5.0
d50 / d84 / d95 /
2
3.6%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table 3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
81
Appendix D
Exhibit Table 11b.4 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Upper B: 200 feet Parameter
Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Min
Mean
Med 21.4 88.1 2
Max
MY-1 SD4
n 1 1 1
Min
Mean
Med 36.36 98.67 1.83
MY-2 Max
SD4
n 1 1 1
Min 22.77 88.56 2.25
MY- 3
Mean Med Max 28.25 33.73 94.09 99.62 2.325 2.4
SD4
n 2 2 2
Min 24.3 89.9 2.3
Mean 25.9 93.6 2.4
Med
MY- 4
Max 27.5 97.2 2.4
SD4
n 2 2 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.1
1
4.26
1
3.1
3.255
3.41
2
3.1
3.2
3.2
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio
42.4 10.8 4.1
1 1 1
66.57 19.87 2.71
1 1 1
54.67 9.49 2.95
65.27 12.24 3.42
75.87 14.99 3.89
2 2 2
58 10.2 3.5
60.1 11.2 3.6
62.1 12.2 3.7
2 2 2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1
1.0
1
1.12
1.1
1.16
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
18.4 5E-04
1 1 2 2 1
79.3 3.3
1
44.25 1.5
49.4 1.7 136.64
136.64 1.89
1
1
Min
Mean
Med Max
MY- 5 SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Profile
41.1 41.6 3.23 3.24
42.2 3.24 107.5
No identifiable riffles 21.6 24.0 2.0 2.0 116.0 116.0
26.4 2.0 116.0
2 2 1
Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) 108.7 Radius of Curvature (ft) 23.8 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) 148.2 Meander Width Ratio
170.8 164.6 261..6 34.2 55.4 50.5 110.1 36.2 2.4 327.6 266.7 621 201.1 12.5
4 5 6 6 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3 Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 3
E5
C5
C5
C5
1.13 Flat 0.0047
1.13 0.00004 0.0047
1.13 0.0041 0.0033
1.13 0.0036 0.0052
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% 3
0%/61%/39%/0%/0%/0%
d50 / d84 / d95 /
1.6/3.3/4.8
2
15.20%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table 3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
82
Appendix D
Exhibit Table 11b.5 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 -Lower B: 230 feet Baseline
Parameter Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Bankfull Width (ft) Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1
Min
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
Bank Height Ratio
Mean
Med 48.4 91.3 1.4 2.9
MY-1
Max
SD4
67.8 34.5 1.9 1.0
n 1 1 1 1
Min
Mean
Med 44.41 93.68 1.24 3.17
MY-2 Max
SD4
n 1 1 1 1
Min 22.1 93.9 1.6 2.8
Mean 25.0 95.2 1.8 3.1
Med
MY- 3 Max 27.9 96.5 2.0 3.5
1 1 1 1
55.25 35.81 2.11 1.0
1 1 1 1
43.8 11.1 3.4 1.0
43.9 14.5 3.9 1.0
44.0 17.8 4.4 1.0
2 2 2 1 1
23 0.005
1 1 2 2 2
10.9 0.0 27.6 1.2 54.2
19.4 0.0 59.3 1.5 99.8
29.8 0.0 99.9 1.7 145.3
SD4
Med
Max 23.1 90.8 1.6 3.2
MY- 4 SD4
n 2 2 2 2
Min 23.1 90.8 1.6 3.2
Mean 23.1 90.8 1.6 3.2
n 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
37.5 14.2 3.9 1.0
37.5 14.2 3.9 1.0
37.5 14.2 3.9 1.0
1 1 1 1
21.7 0.02
21.7 0.02
21.7 0.02
1 1
Min
Mean
Med Max
MY- 5 SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Profile Riffle Length (ft) 14 25.5 40.2 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0027 0.00667 0.0087 Pool Length (ft) 19.1 20.3 21.5 Pool Max depth (ft) 4.1 Pool Spacing (ft) 88.9
40.2 3.9 82.4
47.1 4.2 87.8
54.1 4.4 93.1
No identifiable pools
Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) 108.7 Radius of Curvature (ft) 23.8 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Meander Wavelength (ft) 148.2 Meander Width Ratio
170.8 164.6 261..6 34.2 55.4 50.5 110.1 36.2 1.0 327.6 266.7 621 201.1 5.5
4 5 6 6 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3 3
B5
B5
B5
B5
1.17 0.0035 0.0047
1.17 0.0027 0.0047
1.17 0.0044 0.0021
1.17 0.0041 0.0088
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 0%/61%/39%/0%/0%/0%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% 3
1.6/3.3/4.8
d50 / d84 / d95 /
2
22.80%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table 3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
83
Appendix D
Exhibit Table 11b.6 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Valley Fields Farm/407 - Reach C: 1,400 feet Baseline
Parameter
MY-1
MY- 4
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD
4
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
12.1 13.5 45.6 48.5 0.8 0.9 1.5 1.7
14.0 48.7 1.0 1.8
3 3 3 3
11.2 40.8 0.4 1.2
12.3 46.7 0.7 2.0
11.7 48.7 0.8 2.1
14.1 50.4 0.8 2.6
3 3 3 3
5.5 41.5 0.4 1.2
11.0 9.7 52.4 48.3 0.9 0.8 1.8 1.7
19.0 71.3 1.4 2.4
6.0 13.0 0.4 0.5
4 4 4 4
4.6 36.0 0.7 1.0
5.4 39.1 0.9 1.4
5.8 38.0 1.0 1.6
5.8 43.4 1.1 1.7
3 3 3 3
9.6 8.9 16.3 15.9 3.8 3.6 1.0 1.0
12.4 24.0 4.4 1.0
3 3 3 3
5.7 13.3 3.5 1.0
8.1 20.9 3.8 1.0
9.1 14.9 3.7 1.0
9.4 34.4 4.3 1.0
3 3 3 3
6.1 4.0 2.6 1.0
8.1 8.0 17.6 11.6 6.3 4.9 1.0 1.0
10.2 43.3 12.9 1.0
1.7 17.6 4.7 0.0
4 4 4 4
3.9 4.1 6.2 1.0
4.9 6.2 7.3 1.0
5.1 6.0 7.5 1.0
5.6 8.6 8.3 1.0
3 3 3 3
41.6 36.7 0.0 0.0 50.2 56.4 2.5 2.6 92.5 91.9
90.8 0.0 66.7 2.8 152.2
23.5 0.0 16.7 0.3 37.9
7 7 6 7 9
18.8 0.0 9.4 2.5 22.8
31.3 0.0 74.9 2.8 88.5
50.4 0.0 166.3 3.1 195.7
3 3 3 3 3
2.3 0.0 11.6 0.7 11.2
22.2 0.0 24.0 1.1 39.3
51.5 0.3 38.6 1.6 88.6
11.6 0.0 3.8 1.8 -
18.0 0.0 3.8 1.8 -
24.4 0.0 3.8 1.8 -
2 2 1 1 -
96.4 112.0 11.4 30.7 59.4 16.5 2.3 4.2 0.9 131.2 595.1 237.0 9.7 42.5 16.0
4 5 6 6 5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) Width/Depth Ratio Entrenchment Ratio 1
Bank Height Ratio
7.5 8.9 3.5 1.0
SD
4
MY- 3
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.9 Floodprone Width (ft) 39.6 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.1
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
4
MY-2 SD
4
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
MY- 5 4
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
4
n
Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max depth (ft) Pool Spacing (ft)
21.7 0.0 25.8 2.2 46.0
Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) 84.1 Radius of Curvature (ft) 20.8 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 2.3 Meander Wavelength (ft) 72.5 Meander Width Ratio 8.1
97.4 32.5 2.7 187.8 15.5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) BF slope (ft/ft) 3 3
1.09 0.0099 0.0095
C5
C5
C5
1.09 0.0086 0.0094
1.09 0.0093 0.0093
1.09 0.0093 0.0094
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 0%/54%/30%/9%/0%/0%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% 3
1.8/45/110
d50 / d84 / d95 /
2
0%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table 3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
84
APPENDIX E – HYDROLOGIC DATA
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
85
Appendix E
TABLE 12. VERIFICATION OF BANKFULL EVENTS Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
7/8/2010
N/A
Wrackline observed in floodplain
11/4/2010
N/A
Wrackline observed at bankfull
4/10/2010
N/A
Wrackline observed at bankfull
11/2/2011
N/A
Wrackline observed at bankfull
Photo # (if available) See MY‐02 report See MY‐02 report See MY‐02 report See MY‐02 report
TABLE 13. WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERIA ATTAINMENT TABLE Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage) Gauge Name MY‐01 (2010) MY‐02 (2011) MY‐03 (2013)* MY‐04 (2014) MY‐05 (2015) Yes/103 Yes/67 No/0 CE1 (45.6%) (29.6%) (0%) Yes/109 Yes/68 No/0 CE3 (48.2%) (30.1%) (0%) Yes/86 Yes/21 No/0 CE4 (38.1%) (9.3%) (0%) Yes/97 Yes/38 No/0 CE6 (42.9%) (16.8%) (0%) *Gauges reinstalled 9/23/2013, monitoring only occurred for 21% of growing season
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
86
Appendix E
GROUNDWATER LEVEL MONITORING WELL PLOTS
Valley Fields Farm Reference Gauge CE1 2013-MY03 0.0
Begin Growing Season 3/26/2013
-5.0
4
End Growing Season 11/6/2013
3.5 3
-15.0 2.5 -20.0 2 Gauge installed 9/23/2013
-25.0
Rainfall (in.)
Groundwater Depth (in.)
-10.0
1.5
-30.0 1
-35.0
12/30/2013
12/19/2013
12/8/2013
11/27/2013
11/16/2013
11/5/2013
10/25/2013
10/14/2013
10/3/2013
9/22/2013
9/11/2013
8/31/2013
8/20/2013
8/9/2013
7/29/2013
7/18/2013
7/7/2013
6/26/2013
6/15/2013
6/4/2013
5/24/2013
5/13/2013
5/2/2013
4/21/2013
4/10/2013
3/30/2013
3/19/2013
3/8/2013
2/25/2013
2/14/2013
2/3/2013
0 1/23/2013
-45.0 1/12/2013
0.5
1/1/2013
-40.0
Date Gauge CE1
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Jurisdictional Depth
Rainfall
87
Appendix E
Valley Fields Farm Wetland Gauge CE3 2013-MY03 0.0
Begin Growing Season 3/26/2013
-5.0
4
End Growing Season 11/6/2013
3.5 3
-15.0
Gauge installed 9/23/2013
2.5
-20.0 2 -25.0
Rainfall (in.)
Groundwater Depth (in)
-10.0
1.5 -30.0 1
-35.0
12/30/2013
12/19/2013
12/8/2013
11/27/2013
11/16/2013
11/5/2013
10/25/2013
10/14/2013
10/3/2013
9/22/2013
9/11/2013
8/31/2013
8/20/2013
8/9/2013
7/29/2013
7/18/2013
7/7/2013
6/26/2013
6/15/2013
6/4/2013
5/24/2013
5/13/2013
5/2/2013
4/21/2013
4/10/2013
3/30/2013
3/19/2013
3/8/2013
2/25/2013
2/14/2013
2/3/2013
0 1/23/2013
-45.0 1/12/2013
0.5
1/1/2013
-40.0
Date Gauge CE3
Jurisdictional Depth
Rainfall
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
88
Appendix E
Valley Fields Farm Wetland Gauge CE4 2013-MY03 0.0
Begin Growing Season 3/26/2013
-5.0
4
End Growing Season 11/6/2013
3.5 3
-15.0 2.5 -20.0 2 -25.0 Gauge installed 9/20/2013
-30.0
Rainfall (in.)
Groundwater Depth (in.)
-10.0
1.5 1
-35.0
12/30/2013
12/19/2013
12/8/2013
11/27/2013
11/16/2013
11/5/2013
10/25/2013
10/14/2013
10/3/2013
9/22/2013
9/11/2013
8/31/2013
8/20/2013
8/9/2013
7/29/2013
7/18/2013
7/7/2013
6/26/2013
6/15/2013
6/4/2013
5/24/2013
5/13/2013
5/2/2013
4/21/2013
4/10/2013
3/30/2013
3/19/2013
3/8/2013
2/25/2013
2/14/2013
2/3/2013
0 1/23/2013
-45.0 1/12/2013
0.5
1/1/2013
-40.0
Date Gauge CE4
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Jurisdictional Depth
Rainfall
89
Appendix E
Valley Fields Farm Wetland Gauge CE6 2013-MY03 0.0
Begin Growing Season 3/26/2013
-5.0
4
End Growing Season 11/6/2013
3.5 3
-15.0 2.5 -20.0 2 Gauge installed 9/23/2013
-25.0
Rainfall (in.)
Groundwater Depth (in.)
-10.0
1.5 -30.0 1
-35.0
12/30/2013
12/19/2013
12/8/2013
11/27/2013
11/16/2013
11/5/2013
10/25/2013
10/14/2013
10/3/2013
9/22/2013
9/11/2013
8/31/2013
8/20/2013
8/9/2013
7/29/2013
7/18/2013
7/7/2013
6/26/2013
6/15/2013
6/4/2013
5/24/2013
5/13/2013
5/2/2013
4/21/2013
4/10/2013
3/30/2013
3/19/2013
3/8/2013
2/25/2013
2/14/2013
2/3/2013
0 1/23/2013
-45.0 1/12/2013
0.5
1/1/2013
-40.0
Date Gauge CE6
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site NCEEP Project #407 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Jurisdictional Depth
Rainfall
90
