Cu2O Decorated with Co-catalyst MoS2 for Solar Hydrogen ...
Supporting information (SI)
Cu2O Decorated with Co-catalyst MoS2 for Solar Hydrogen Production with Enhanced Efficiency under Visible Light Yu-Fei Zhao a,b, Zhi-Yu Yang a, Yu-Xia Zhang a, Lin Jing a, Xin Guo a, Zhengtai Ke a, Panwei Hu a , Guoxiu Wang b, Yi-Ming Yan a,*, and Ke-Ning Sun a,* a
Beijing Key Laboratory for Chemical Power Source and Green Catalysis, School of Chemical Engineering and Environment, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China b
Center for Clean Energy Technology, School of Chemistry and Forensic Science, Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
Corresponding Authors. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Tel (Fax): +86-10-68918696
1
Figure S1. The home-made measurement system for the photocatalytic water splitting.
2
Figure S2. (a) SEM image and (b) XRD pattern of layered MoS2
3
Figure S3. SEM image of pristine Cu2O nanoparticles.
4
Figure S4. The transient photocurrent−time profile at bias -0.1 V vs. SCE for MoS2 mixed with Cu2O composite (the mass ratio 1:100).
5
Figure S5. XPS survey spectra of (a) pristine Cu2O and (b) MoS2@Cu2O composites after the photostability test.
6
Cu2O Decorated with Co-catalyst MoS2 for Solar Hydrogen Production with Enhanced Efficiency under Visible Light Yu-Fei Zhao a,b, Zhi-Yu Yang a, Yu-Xia Zhang a, Lin Jing a, Xin Guo a, Zhengtai Ke a, Panwei Hu a , Guoxiu Wang b, Yi-Ming Yan a,*, and Ke-Ning Sun a,* a
Beijing Key Laboratory for Chemical Power Source and Green Catalysis, School of Chemical Engineering and Environment, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China b
Center for Clean Energy Technology, School of Chemistry and Forensic Science, Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
Corresponding Authors. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Tel (Fax): +86-10-68918696
1
Figure S1. The home-made measurement system for the photocatalytic water splitting.
2
Figure S2. (a) SEM image and (b) XRD pattern of layered MoS2
3
Figure S3. SEM image of pristine Cu2O nanoparticles.
4
Figure S4. The transient photocurrent−time profile at bias -0.1 V vs. SCE for MoS2 mixed with Cu2O composite (the mass ratio 1:100).
5
Figure S5. XPS survey spectra of (a) pristine Cu2O and (b) MoS2@Cu2O composites after the photostability test.
6
