Customer Segmentation

Report 5 Downloads 128 Views
Customer Segmentation: Leverage Emerging Fencing Techniques to Optimize Revenue Performance

2

Josh Belkin Sr Director, Global Retail Merchandising Hotels.com 3

Fencing enables hotels to set prices and promotions based on customer segments Fenced rates for valuable customers while still protecting public rates

Customer segments for fenced rates can be defined by several traits 1

Fenced rates

Public rates

Fenced customers Public customers

4

Purchase device



Booking on desktop vs. mobile device

2 Customer origin/ location



Domestic vs. international customers vs. local customers

3



Loyalty program members vs. email subscribers vs. others

4

Customer loyalty

Other • observable traits

Any other valuable segmentation traits

Fencing is important as prices and discounts are key to influence hotel buying decision of customers Factors influencing last hotel decision for hotel stayers

Price is the top factor influencing hotel booking decision

~ 60% of customers said Price influenced their hotel decision

63%

Price

61%

Location of Hotel Property

32%

Previous experience

Hotel brand

30%

Amenities

29%

Special offer/discount

29% 26%

Positive hotel reviews

23%

Hotel pictures

Hotel star rating

21%

Loyalty membership

20% 14%

Restaurants in the hotel

Special offers/discounts also has a large role in influencing decision

Recommendations from friends/family

13%

Hotel size

12%

Recent renovation

4%

Question: “What factor influenced your last hotel decision? Select all that apply” Source: Phocuswright (Dis)Loyalty and the US Leisure Traveler

5

1

Purchase device fencing: target mobile customers who book last minute

1 in 4 hotel room nights are booked on a mobile device (and increasing!)

~ 1 in 2 mobile customers book same day/day before their trip 2015 Advance booking window for domestic US travel

2015 Forecasted YoY growth in US digital travel sales

40.7% 53%

1+ days

80%

5.5% 47%

-2.2%

0-1 days

20% Desktop

Desktop/ Laptop

Mobile

Source: Hotels.com data

Mobile

Source: eMarketer, April 2014, October 2014

6

Overall

2

Customer origin fencing: target international travelers while protecting domestic pricing

Foreign exchange rates can impact demand patterns

International customers book earlier and stay longer 2015 Booking window (months) for US hotels

GBP, EUR and CAD/USD exchange rate (Index, July 2014=100)

27% 100 Domestic customers International customers

8% 6% 13% 27%

13%

3+ mo

GBP

73% 19%

90

Jul ’14

< 1 mo

58%

Source: Hotels.com data

EUR

80

42%

2-3 mo 1-2 mo

CAD

Sep ’14

Nov ’14

Jan ’15

Mar ’15

May ’15

US Hotels Growth rate (Indexed to July 2014 = 100) 2015 Length of stay (days) in US hotels Domestic customers

120

80

+1.2 days International Customers

US->US

100

1.8

Int’l -> US

60

3.0

Jul ’14

Source: Hotels.com data

Sep ’14

Source: Hotels.com data

7

Nov ’14

Jan ’15

Mar ’15

3

Customer loyalty fencing: target loyalty program members who travel and comparison shop frequently

The loyalty traveler population is vast and they travel frequently • •

Loyalty members are savvy travelers looking for best deals •

1 in 2 hotel stayers and 1 in 3 OTA shoppers are loyalty members Loyalty participation increases with trip frequency so they are more likely frequent travelers



US Loyalty traveler population (M) and program membership (% of segment)

Loyalty members are more likely to shop across multiple websites than non loyalty members 61% of elite program members said they’d check multiple websites to get a good deal Online shopping behavior by loyalty status “When planning travel, I always check multiple websites to make sure I am getting a good deal”

118M Non-members

55M 56M (47%)

Loyalty members

No hotel loyalty

42%

Entry level/ Mid-tier

41%

Elite

18M (33%)

Hotel Stayers OTA shoppers

36% 41% 61%

Strongly agree

Neutral/Unsure

Slightly agree

Slightly disagree

25% Strongly disagree

Source: Phocuswright (Dis)Loyalty and the US Leisure Traveler

Source: Phocuswright (Dis)Loyalty and the US Leisure Traveler

8

Linda Gulrajani, CRME VP, Revenue Strategy & Distribution Marcus Hotels & Resorts Member of HSMAI’s Revenue Management Advisory Board 9

Scenario 1: Branded Strategy (Hilton) Target Customer Segment: Past transient guests who don’t already have a reservation and did not book a negotiated rate.

Fence & Method: $79 rate with a calendar that had the dates with that rate available highlighted (had other rates available for all dates) Sent out one email campaign that was bookable for 7 days and covered a 6 week booking window and then sent another one when there was only one day left with the same offer.

Success: Booked $27k in revenue The second “one day left” email out performed the first email

Tracking: Through the Clairvoyix and Hilton.com 10

Scenario 2: Resort Strategy Target Customer Segment: Transient guests who have booked through a discount channel like Groupon, Travelzoo, etc. in the past that don’t have a future reservation (Very important to collect email addresses from these guests).

Fence & Method: Email 48 hour sale promoting “book now and get the lowest rates of the year” sent out 1 week prior to the Groupon/Travelzoo offer going out

Success: Booked 1,030 rooms through this offer, which decreased the next “special offer” production significantly, saving us the commission and capturing them direct

Tracking: With a special rate code

11

Scenario 3: OTA Strategy Target Customer Segment: Fenced guests (or members) on OTAs

Fence & Method: Discount for members only

Success: 30% - 40% of the OTA bookings are coming from this channel Improved placement on the site This requires that a guest creates a login, but there are no other fences that prevent them from seeing the special pricing so is this really a fenced offer?

Tracking: Reports provided by market managers

12

Kathleen Cullen, CRME SVP, Revenue & Distribution Commune Hotels & Resorts Chair of HSMAI’s Revenue Management Advisory Board 13

Scenario 1: Goal: Fill Suite Occupancy without public discounting Targeted Customer Segment: Guests with stays more than once and have paid an ADR range of $400-$2500.

Fence: Pull qualified customer list from CRM

Method: Via Email Communication or private mailing with an invitation to stay in one of the remodeled luxury suites. Tracking: Email Campaign Statistics, Rate Code Production and if bookable via a landing page on brand.com Google Analytics

14

15

16

Scenario 2: Goal: Build occupancy base outside the 45 day booking window. Customer Segment: OTA International Customers

Fence: Unique POS (Point of Sale) + include a cancel policy and/or MLOS restriction

Method: Via OTA partners using Unique POS (ie: UK, Brazil, etc.)

Tracking: OTA reports or set up a specific Rate Code to track all bookings.

17

Example: Extranet Results

18

Scenario 3: Goal: Increase Website Conversions Customer Segment: Direct Bookers

Fence: Guests that are within Shopping Cart Funnel

Method: Show LightBox to potential guest that has checked rates & avail but closes out booking engine. Email trigger to potential guest that started to make their reservation but does not complete.

Tracking: Booking Engine Reporting + Partner Reporting

19

Email Abandonment

20

Booking Engine Pop-up

21

May Results # of Abandoned Carts

4,819

# of Guests we were able to invite back

548

# of Reservations Recovered

26

Reservation Value

$ 502.72

Revenue

$13,070.75 *

Cost

$392.12

ROI

$33:1 * 15% of Pre-Opening Website Revenue

22

Scenario 4: Goal: Drive occupancy on select need dates Customer Segment: Local Residents

Fence: Live in specific zip codes

Method: Serve Paid Search Text and Display Advertising to shoppers with a Florida Zip Code Dedicated Email Blast to Thompson Hotel’s email database with a Florida address Load Florida Resident Rate to a Booking Engine Filter

Tracking: Paid Search Reports, Email results + Google Analytics

23

Paid Search

24

Email Blast

25

Results April – June MTD, 2015 Room Nights

161

Reservations

71

LOS

2.3

ADR

$253.13

Revenue

$40,754.85

Cost

$7,797.71

ROI

$5:1

26