1. Terminal Area Improvements, including a new terminal, parking ...
Welcome!
1.1
Background
Welcome to the Aspen/ Pitkin County Airport Improvements EA Public Meeting
Project Refresher: Two Primary Projects: 1. Terminal Area Improvements, including a new terminal, parking and associated projects 2. Runway Shift, 80 feet to the west and widening up to 150 feet Proposed Projects
What is an Environmental Assessment? • An Environmental Assessment looks at the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project • EA environmentally clears space for the projects per the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • It is a formal, national process based on Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations and FAA orders for how to comply with NEPA
Meeting Goals: • Review preliminary findings of several environmental resource categories including visual resources, historic resources, farmlands, among others (subsequent meeting will address the rest of the resources after analysis has been completed) • Engage the community in dialogue, receive public comments on the preliminary findings
How to Participate: As you review the boards, there are several ways to comment • Grab a Terminal Visualization evaluation card • This score card lets us know how well the previous comments from the public have been integrated into the current terminal visualizations • Score the two terminal alternatives on these factors • Write any additional comments you might have on the back • Drop off the evaluation card in the marked box in the center of the room before you leave • Grab some post its • Do you have other comments? Please put your comments on post it notes and place on the board in question • Questions • Ask anyone with a nametag on to help you out
Thank you for your participation!
Next Steps: • Complete Environmental Consequences Analysis • Public meeting on noise and other environmental categories (later in 2016) • Release Draft EA with public comment period • Public Hearing
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Runway Improvements
1.2
Background
Background • ASE currently has a 95 ft. wingspan restriction in place based on runway to taxiway separation distance • Aircraft trends indicated that the aircraft with wingspans less than 95 ft. will be phased out, with half of the U.S. fleet retired by 2021 • With wingspan restriction still in place, current air carriers would not be able to operate at ASE with future fleet • FAA will not allow another MOD to allow larger wingspan without ASE meeting FAA standards of 400 feet separation • In order to have future Design Group-III air service at ASE, the FAA is requiring the airfield to be brought into FAA compliance for that Design Group
Purpose & Need • PURPOSE : The purpose of this project is to meet FAA design standards, allowing ASE to keep commercial service in the long-term • NEED: The implementation of the runway reconfiguration will address the fact that the current airfield does not meet the FAA design standards for D-III aircraft due to the deficient separation distance between the runway and taxiway
Runway Alternatives No Action Alternative • Airfield will remain “as is” operating under the 95 foot wingspan • Air service will be reduced to turboprops; some operations will divert to business jets Runway Reconfiguration Alternative • Airfield will be reconfigured: • Runway shift 80 feet west; Runway widening to 150 feet • Airfield brought into compliance with FAA design standards • Aircraft up to 118 feet wingspan will be able to fly into ASE • All other alternatives in the airfield study would either not meet project purpose and need or would result in more impacts on the airport environs • Therefore, the minimal shift required to meet FAA design
standards
is
the only Runway
Reconfiguration Alternative brought forward into the EA (along with the No Action)
Future Air Service Study (2014) Aircraft up to 118 feet could theoretically serve Aspen under the proposed Runway Alternative *E-Jets E2 data are preliminary ** Potentially performance capable, but likely limited during hotter summer months. Pending airline coordination will help determine if these aircraft could meet airline safety requirements for performance
Runway Reconfiguration Alternative
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Terminal Area Improvements
1.3
Background
Purpose & Need • East side improvements were recommended in the Master Plan due to: • Existing Terminal Area deficiencies • Apron issues • Operational issues • Roadway/connectivity issues • PURPOSE: The purpose of the terminal replacement and associated east side projects is to optimize the safety and efficiency of the airport • NEED: The implementation of the terminal replacement and associated projects will address the following needs: • The existing terminal and terminal area is deficient in space with operational, safety and functional issues that do not currently meet the needs of passengers, staff and users • Apron is deficient in size and currently slopes into the terminal, creating safety hazards • GA Apron noise has been identified as an issue for surrounding communities and a need to mitigate this noise was identified in the master plan
Terminal Alternatives • No Action Alternative • Terminal will remain “as is” • Existing needs of passengers and operations will continue to not be met • Terminal Alternatives 1 and 2 • Terminal Alternatives assume : • The same disturbance footprint (entire East Side Terminal Area) for Terminal Replacement, roadway and parking improvements, noise wall and other associated projects. • Only one parking alternative brought forward (meeting existing number of spaces). Expansion of parking onsite through a garage or expansion of the lots was determined to not be feasible. • Pedestrian integration with public transit will be enhanced • Two Terminal Alternatives differ in visualizations
340’-0”
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
ACCESS VIEW OPPORTUNITY
PARKING
GATE LOUNGE TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
HWY 82
145’-0”
Terminal Conceptual Alternative 1 : The Ridge
340’-0”
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
ACCESS VIEW OPPORTUNITY
GATE LOUNGE
MECH
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
PARKING
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
HWY 82
145’-0”
Terminal Conceptual Alternative 2 : The Pavilion
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Terminal Sizing
1.4
Background
Terminal Functionality & Assumptions • Terminal is undersized for current conditions • Some areas of deficiency includes: Passenger Hold Room, TSA checkpoint and baggage screening, restrooms, airline operations area, bag claim area, among others • 2012 Master Plan recommended sizing for terminal based on 70 seat regional jet aircraft: • 80,411 square feet based on forecasts for 2017 • 97,939 square feet based on forecasts for 2027 • New Planning years are 2023, 2028, and 2033 • 2014 Air Service Study determinded that future aircraft will be larger, with more seats • Air carrier peak hours will be increasing • More aircraft will be arriving and departing around the same time • More people will be in the terminal at the same time • Due to ASE’s high delay (about 30%) in winter months, passengers tend to be stuck for long periods in the hold room and terminal • New conditions for planning years 2023 (first year of terminal operation) and 2028 (out year of terminal and first year of runway reconfiguration of the out year) and 2033 (out year for runway): • Increased aircraft seating capacity (assuming CS100 - with 110-135 seats) • Spatial requirements would need to increase for functionality • Primary areas of size increases for Hold Room, TSA passenger screening and baggage screening, airline operations, bag claim, restrooms, and concessions • Timeline based on funding • Environmental Assessments examine potential environmental impacts from footprint • An EA looks at potential disturbance footprint • Assumes a footprint of the entire east side terminal area for the determination of impacts of the terminal, parking and associated improvements
High Level Terminal Steps: EA
• Step 1: Environmental Assessment (Current Step) • Environmentally Clear Space based on Industry Standards for Terminal; allow room for options and phasing
• Step 2: Terminal Programming • Determine space, functionality, and level of service needs for Aspen, Programming allow for community compatibility and be consistent with FAA requirements
Design
• Step 3: Terminal Design • BOCC to finalize space, functionality and level of service goals, terminal design, and local clearances • EA will be reviewed to ensure it is consistent with final design prior to construction
• Step 4: Construction Construction
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Terminal Sizing
1.5
Background
Terminal Functionality & Assumptions • High Level Size Range outlined in the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Report #25 (Airport Terminal Planning and Design, Volume 1) • Methodology premised on number of square feet per narrow body aircraft gate • ACRP planning assumption: Small domestic airports = 15,000 to 18,000 square feet per narrow body gate • ASE currently operates with 8 gates • Master Plan recommended 10 gates: Larger CS-100s can be accommodated with 8-10 gates in the planning years (2023, 2028, 2033) • ACRP Industry Standard Sizing Range (high level) • Conditions Today (CRJ-700): 90,000-108,000 • 6 gates x 15,000 square feet per gate and 6 gates x 18,000 square feet per gate • Future Conditions (2028): 8 gates with CS-100 aircraft: 120,000 – 144,000 • 8 gates x 15,000 sq. ft. per gate and 8 gates x 18,000 square feet per gate • Future Conditions (2033): 10 gates with CS-100 aircraft): 150,000 – 180,000 • 10 gates x 15,000 sq. ft. per gate and 10 gates x 18,000 square feet per gate • Based on local conditions, EA will examine approximately 140,000 square feet in terms of footprint and visual impacts
• NOTE: These are planning level estimates based off industry standards for the purpose of the EA (environmentally clearing the space); not a design process or decision point • Terminal programming during subsequent design phase will update numbers for each terminal space specific to Aspen to ensure functional needs, community compatibility and compliant with FAA requirements • BOCC will make a decision on size during terminal programming design phases with robust community involvement
Aviation Activity Forecast Table (2015-2033) *NOTE: 2014 Air Service Study identified the 737 as potentially performance capable under D-III standards (note yet confirmed by airlines); Fleet mix assumes a small number of these operations to be conservative
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Environmental Consequences
2.1
Analysis
Environmental Categories Categories to Evaluate per FAA Order 1050.1F Include : • Air Quality
• Land Use
• Biological Resources
• Natural Resources and Energy Supply
• Climate
• Noise and Noise-Compatible Land Use
• Coastal Resources
• Socioeconomics Impacts, Environmental Justice,
• Department of Transportation Act: Section 4(f)
and Children’s Environmental Health and Safety
• Farmlands
Risks
• Hazardous Materials, Pollution Prevention, and
• Visual Effects
Solid Waste
• Water Resources (Wetlands, Floodplains and Wild and Scenic Rivers)
• Historical, Architectural, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources
• Cumulative Impacts
• Green highlights denotes categories with preliminary environmental consequences available today; remaining categories will be addressed in a subsequent public meeting • Farmlands: All area is per-disturbed, no prime farmlands impacted • Coastal Resources: Area is 500+ miles from the nearest coastal area; no impacts
Natural Resources & Energy Supply • Runway Alternatives • Increased water usage and fuel consumption would occur during construction. This usage would be temporary and is not expected to place undue stress on the environment. • Sustainable Construction Management Plan: Techniques would be employed for conservation of resources and energy. • No long-term net increase of energy use • Terminal Alternatives • Increased water usage and fuel consumption would occur during construction. This usage would be temporary and is not expected to place undue stress on the environment. • Energy use: • Terminal size would increase however, terminal has option to increase energy efficiency/integration of renewable energy options • No significant impact on energy resources expected
Hazardous Materials & Pollution Prevention Summary • Runway and Terminal Alternatives • The Alternatives are not expected to change the handling, use or disposal of hazardous materials and waste • No known hazardous waste sites would be impacted • Construction activities could generate hazardous waste as materials commonly consist of paint, oil, solvents, etc. and solid waste. Impacts would be temporary and not significant • No long term increases in solid waste expected. Terminal expansion would meet existing demand • Solid waste would increase during construction: • Landfill has a 15 year lifespan • Sustainable Construction Management Plan would be followed to reduce solid waste creation during construction
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Environmental Consequences
2.2
Analysis
Historical, Architectural, Archaeological & Cultural Resources • Runway Alternative • A historic property, Airport Ranch, sits near the project site. While not on the National Register of Historic Places, the ranch was determined eligible in 1988 • The ranch is located outside the Area of Potential Effect, and is not expected to incur impacts • Terminal Alternatives • No historic or historically eligible properties exist on the east side • Therefore, no impacts to historically eligible properties
Historic Area of Potential Effect
Department of Transportation Section 4(f) • Section 4(f) resources include publicly owned parks, recreation areas, wildlife or waterfowl refuges, or lands of historic sites that are of national, state, or local significance. • Runway Alternative • A historic property, Airport Ranch, sits near the project site. The historic property is located outside the Area of Potential Effect, and would not incur impacts • Approximately 1,657 feet of Owl Creek Bike Path would be relocated between 13 feet and 58 feet to the west, outside of the Object Free Area • Temporary closure during construction • No long term impact on the bike path, its uses or users • Terminal Alternatives • No negative Impacts
Bike Path & Owl Creek Road Relocation
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Visual Background
2.3
Analysis
Summary of Visioning Meeting The vision session occurred in February 2015 and was organized into (4) areas for discussion:
1. “SENSE OF PLACE” 2. “SUSTAINABILITY” 3. “NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY” 4. “PASSENGER EXPERIENCE” During the open house, we documented community input, insights and consolidated the comments into general themes.
Evaluation Criteria Strong Indoor-Outdoor Relationship Reflecting Community Vision Optimizing Views Sustainable Design Prioritizing the Passenger Experience Being a Good Neighbor Build it Once, Build it Right
General Themes “A Balanced Approach” • Economic lifeline • Operational efficiency • Good neighbor • Part of the community • Build it once, build it right “Embrace the Outdoors” • Views • Inside / outside spaces “The Gateway Experience” • Reflect the community vision “Connectivity to the Community” • Ground transportation / accessibility
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
What’s Happened
2.4
Analysis
Site Influencing Factors - Horizontal Our area of study for a new terminal and associated site operations (parking / access/ enplanement strategy) is bound by the proposed runway changes and Highway 82. SEE SHEET 3 OF 23
Section A TERMINAL AREA PLAN IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 3 OF 23)
UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE
Area of Study HWY 82
GSE BUILDING
RSA
RSA
TOFA ROFA
RSA
T/W
A5
CS100
1 CS
CS100
CS100
CS100
RSA
ROFA
ROFA
T/W B8
320' TOFA
RSA
TOFA RSA
RSA
T/W B9
150'
RUNWAY 15/33
RSA
T/W A9
RSA
TOFA RSA
TOFA
ROFA TOFA
00
CS100
TAXIWAY A
TAXIWAY A
TAXIWAY B TAXIWAY B
ROFA
TOFA
ROFA
TOFA
ROFA
TOFA
ROFA
50'
RSA
400'
blincoln
TOFA
AOC
50'
May 28, 2014 - 8:39am
ROFA
150'
RUNWAY 15/33
TAXILANE A
ROFA
T/W A8
RSA
T/W A3
RSA
400'
NORTH GA RAMP IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 4 OF 23)
ROFA
TOFA
T/W A7
TAXILANE A
ROFA
T/W A1
RSA
Y 82
TOFA
TOFA
400'
ROFA
00
CS1
T/W A6
TOFA
320'
ROFA
F.B.O.
T/W A4
EXTENDED TAXIWAY A
SOUTH GA RAMP IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 3 AND 4 OF 23)
HW
FAA
T/W A2
TOFA
HANGAR
CS100
EXTENDED T-SHADE HANGARS
TERMINAL
HANGAR
TO
FA
TOFA
OWL CREEK ROAD
OWL CREEK
I:\Projects\ASE\Engineering\ASE LOC 14-01 - Future Air Service Study - Phase II\Phase II\Phase II alternatives\ASE 14-01 ALT 12.dwg
F.B.O. WEST SIDE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 4 OF 23)
ROAD
N
AIRPORT RANCH
Aerial Map with Area of Study Highlighted
SHEET 4 OF 23 *Based on Masterplan Update Aspen/Pitkin County AirportSEE(12/2012)
MASTER PLAN COMPARISON TO PROPOSED LAYOUT FROM STUDY IMPACTS - CURRENT PROPOSED MASTER PLAN LAYOUT TERMINAL AREA/COMMERCIAL RAMP SOUTH AND NORTH GA RAMP WEST SIDE DEVELOPMENT
- ALL RSA'S, ROFA'S, AND TOFA'S SHOWN ARE FOR PROPOSED AIRCRAFT PAVEMENT PROPOSED AIRFIELD AND ROAD LAYOUT FROM AIR SERVICE STUDY ASE PROPERTY LINE BURLINGAME RANCH PROPERTY LINE CDOT PROPERTY LINE HIGHWAY 82 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACK
LEGEND ®
MASTER PLAN LAYOUT AIRCRAFT PAVEMENT MASTER PLAN LAYOUT BUILDINGS
GRAPHIC SCALE 300
MASTER PLAN LAYOUT ROADWAYS AND PARKING LOTS
0
300
600
( IN FEET )
900 S. BROADWAY SUITE 350 PHONE: 303-524-3030
DENVER, CO 80209 FAX: 303-534-3031
WWW.JVIATION.COM
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT ASPEN, COLORADO FUTURE AIR SERVICE STUDY - PHASE II ALTERNATIVE 12 DATE: MAY 30, 2014
SHEET 2 OF 23
Site Section A
Site Influencing Factors - Vertical The general topography of the valley has an overall effect of making the airport slope at an average of 2% consistently along the runway which impacts the terminal planning.
3D Diagram A | Airfield-to-Apron
3D Diagram B | Apron-to-Landside
3D Diagram A & B (see above)
N
3D Diagram Overall Airport Topography
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
What’s Happened
2.5
Analysis
Existing Neighborhood Views
1 | view from Trentaz Road
1 | night view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound 1 | view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
2
Concept 1 “The Ridge”
3.1
Building Concepts
Terminal Layout
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
340’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
CURBSIDE VIEW OPPORTUNITY
PARKING
GATE LOUNGE TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
HWY 82
145’-0”
Site Section Typical East-West
L S
OU B
CURBSIDE
LOADING/ STORAGE
AIRLINE OPS
TSA BAG SCREEN
AIRPORT ADMIN.
AIRLINE TICKET OFFICE
CIRCULATION / RESTROOMS
TICKETING
BAGGAGE CLAIM
SECURITY CHECKPOINT
OUTBOUND BAGGAGE
Plan Legend MECHANICAL
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
Level 1
CURBSIDE
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE
OPEN TO BELOW
INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
GATE LOUNGE
APRON
Level 2
Plan Diagrams
RFTA Station RFTA Station
Long Term
Short Term
Employee
Rental Ready
Rental Car Service Long Term
Commercial Apron
Site Plan Conceptual Layout
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
2
3.2
Concept 1 “The Ridge”
Building Concepts
Perspectives A Site integration achieves a smaller scale while capitalizing on thermal mass of the ground B Low profile roof “hugs” the landscape to create a neighborhood scale C Potential green roof patio provides an extended outdoor experience D Structure & building form respond to internal program & spatial needs E Interconnected spaces create layered views & intuitive wayfinding F Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
F
B
D C F
E
A
Building Cross Section | looking north
A Pedestrian-scale approach & curbside experience B Low profile roof “hugs” the landscape to create a neighborhood scale C Landscaped area provides an extended outdoor experience D Southeast corner lifts to frame views of Buttermilk Ski Area E Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
D B
E
E A C
Building Exterior | looking northwest
A Framed view to Buttermilk Ski Area B Landscaped area provides an extended outdoor experience C Building form allows ticketing, bag claim & gate lounge to share volume, daylight & views D Amenities & seating in non-secure area creates a relaxed & pleasant public space
C
A
B
D
Building Interior | looking south
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
2
Concept 1 “The Ridge”
3.3
Building Concepts
Neighborhood Views
1 | view from Trentaz Road
1 | night view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound 1 | view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
2
Concept 2 “The Pavilion”
4.1
Building Concepts
Terminal Layout
340’-0”
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
CURBSIDE VIEW OPPORTUNITY
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
GATE LOUNGE
PARKING
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
MECH
HWY 82
145’-0”
Site Section Typical East-West
L S
OU B
CURBSIDE
LOADING/ STORAGE
ENTRY PLAZA AIRLINE OPS
AIRPORT ADMIN.
AIRLINE TICKET OFFICE
CIRCULATION / RESTROOMS
TICKETING
TSA BAG SCREEN
SECURITY CHECKPOINT
OUTBOUND BAGGAGE
BAGGAGE CLAIM
Plan Legend MECHANICAL
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
Level 1
CURBSIDE
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
GATE LOUNGE
APRON
Level 2
Plan Diagrams
RFTA Station RFTA Station
Long Term
Short Term
Employee
Rental Ready
Rental Car Service Long Term
Commercial Apron
Site Plan Conceptual Layout
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
2
Concept 2 “The Pavilion”
4.2
Building Concepts
Perspectives A Site integration achieves a smaller scale while capitalizing on thermal mass of the ground B Expansive views from gate lounge C Potential green roof patio provides an extended outdoor experience D Skylights optimize natural daylight E Entry plaza creates a welcoming & pleasant public space F Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
F
F B
C F
D
E
A
Building Cross Section | looking north
A Stepped building massing reduces building scale B Entry plaza creates a welcoming & pleasant public space C Potential green roof patio provides an extended outdoor experience D Southeast corner lifts to frame views of Buttermilk Ski Area E Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
D A C
E
E
B
B
Building Exterior | looking northwest
A Skylights optimize natural daylight B Amenities & seating in non-secure area creates a relaxed & pleasant public space C Entry plaza creates a welcoming public space, as well as a setting for local artist, interactive amenities & events
A
C
B
Building Interior | looking south
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
C
2
Concept 2 “The Pavilion”
4.3
Building Concepts
Neighborhood Views
1 | view from Trentaz Road
1 | night view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound 1 | view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
1.1
Background
Welcome to the Aspen/ Pitkin County Airport Improvements EA Public Meeting
Project Refresher: Two Primary Projects: 1. Terminal Area Improvements, including a new terminal, parking and associated projects 2. Runway Shift, 80 feet to the west and widening up to 150 feet Proposed Projects
What is an Environmental Assessment? • An Environmental Assessment looks at the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project • EA environmentally clears space for the projects per the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • It is a formal, national process based on Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations and FAA orders for how to comply with NEPA
Meeting Goals: • Review preliminary findings of several environmental resource categories including visual resources, historic resources, farmlands, among others (subsequent meeting will address the rest of the resources after analysis has been completed) • Engage the community in dialogue, receive public comments on the preliminary findings
How to Participate: As you review the boards, there are several ways to comment • Grab a Terminal Visualization evaluation card • This score card lets us know how well the previous comments from the public have been integrated into the current terminal visualizations • Score the two terminal alternatives on these factors • Write any additional comments you might have on the back • Drop off the evaluation card in the marked box in the center of the room before you leave • Grab some post its • Do you have other comments? Please put your comments on post it notes and place on the board in question • Questions • Ask anyone with a nametag on to help you out
Thank you for your participation!
Next Steps: • Complete Environmental Consequences Analysis • Public meeting on noise and other environmental categories (later in 2016) • Release Draft EA with public comment period • Public Hearing
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Runway Improvements
1.2
Background
Background • ASE currently has a 95 ft. wingspan restriction in place based on runway to taxiway separation distance • Aircraft trends indicated that the aircraft with wingspans less than 95 ft. will be phased out, with half of the U.S. fleet retired by 2021 • With wingspan restriction still in place, current air carriers would not be able to operate at ASE with future fleet • FAA will not allow another MOD to allow larger wingspan without ASE meeting FAA standards of 400 feet separation • In order to have future Design Group-III air service at ASE, the FAA is requiring the airfield to be brought into FAA compliance for that Design Group
Purpose & Need • PURPOSE : The purpose of this project is to meet FAA design standards, allowing ASE to keep commercial service in the long-term • NEED: The implementation of the runway reconfiguration will address the fact that the current airfield does not meet the FAA design standards for D-III aircraft due to the deficient separation distance between the runway and taxiway
Runway Alternatives No Action Alternative • Airfield will remain “as is” operating under the 95 foot wingspan • Air service will be reduced to turboprops; some operations will divert to business jets Runway Reconfiguration Alternative • Airfield will be reconfigured: • Runway shift 80 feet west; Runway widening to 150 feet • Airfield brought into compliance with FAA design standards • Aircraft up to 118 feet wingspan will be able to fly into ASE • All other alternatives in the airfield study would either not meet project purpose and need or would result in more impacts on the airport environs • Therefore, the minimal shift required to meet FAA design
standards
is
the only Runway
Reconfiguration Alternative brought forward into the EA (along with the No Action)
Future Air Service Study (2014) Aircraft up to 118 feet could theoretically serve Aspen under the proposed Runway Alternative *E-Jets E2 data are preliminary ** Potentially performance capable, but likely limited during hotter summer months. Pending airline coordination will help determine if these aircraft could meet airline safety requirements for performance
Runway Reconfiguration Alternative
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Terminal Area Improvements
1.3
Background
Purpose & Need • East side improvements were recommended in the Master Plan due to: • Existing Terminal Area deficiencies • Apron issues • Operational issues • Roadway/connectivity issues • PURPOSE: The purpose of the terminal replacement and associated east side projects is to optimize the safety and efficiency of the airport • NEED: The implementation of the terminal replacement and associated projects will address the following needs: • The existing terminal and terminal area is deficient in space with operational, safety and functional issues that do not currently meet the needs of passengers, staff and users • Apron is deficient in size and currently slopes into the terminal, creating safety hazards • GA Apron noise has been identified as an issue for surrounding communities and a need to mitigate this noise was identified in the master plan
Terminal Alternatives • No Action Alternative • Terminal will remain “as is” • Existing needs of passengers and operations will continue to not be met • Terminal Alternatives 1 and 2 • Terminal Alternatives assume : • The same disturbance footprint (entire East Side Terminal Area) for Terminal Replacement, roadway and parking improvements, noise wall and other associated projects. • Only one parking alternative brought forward (meeting existing number of spaces). Expansion of parking onsite through a garage or expansion of the lots was determined to not be feasible. • Pedestrian integration with public transit will be enhanced • Two Terminal Alternatives differ in visualizations
340’-0”
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
ACCESS VIEW OPPORTUNITY
PARKING
GATE LOUNGE TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
HWY 82
145’-0”
Terminal Conceptual Alternative 1 : The Ridge
340’-0”
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
ACCESS VIEW OPPORTUNITY
GATE LOUNGE
MECH
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
PARKING
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
HWY 82
145’-0”
Terminal Conceptual Alternative 2 : The Pavilion
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Terminal Sizing
1.4
Background
Terminal Functionality & Assumptions • Terminal is undersized for current conditions • Some areas of deficiency includes: Passenger Hold Room, TSA checkpoint and baggage screening, restrooms, airline operations area, bag claim area, among others • 2012 Master Plan recommended sizing for terminal based on 70 seat regional jet aircraft: • 80,411 square feet based on forecasts for 2017 • 97,939 square feet based on forecasts for 2027 • New Planning years are 2023, 2028, and 2033 • 2014 Air Service Study determinded that future aircraft will be larger, with more seats • Air carrier peak hours will be increasing • More aircraft will be arriving and departing around the same time • More people will be in the terminal at the same time • Due to ASE’s high delay (about 30%) in winter months, passengers tend to be stuck for long periods in the hold room and terminal • New conditions for planning years 2023 (first year of terminal operation) and 2028 (out year of terminal and first year of runway reconfiguration of the out year) and 2033 (out year for runway): • Increased aircraft seating capacity (assuming CS100 - with 110-135 seats) • Spatial requirements would need to increase for functionality • Primary areas of size increases for Hold Room, TSA passenger screening and baggage screening, airline operations, bag claim, restrooms, and concessions • Timeline based on funding • Environmental Assessments examine potential environmental impacts from footprint • An EA looks at potential disturbance footprint • Assumes a footprint of the entire east side terminal area for the determination of impacts of the terminal, parking and associated improvements
High Level Terminal Steps: EA
• Step 1: Environmental Assessment (Current Step) • Environmentally Clear Space based on Industry Standards for Terminal; allow room for options and phasing
• Step 2: Terminal Programming • Determine space, functionality, and level of service needs for Aspen, Programming allow for community compatibility and be consistent with FAA requirements
Design
• Step 3: Terminal Design • BOCC to finalize space, functionality and level of service goals, terminal design, and local clearances • EA will be reviewed to ensure it is consistent with final design prior to construction
• Step 4: Construction Construction
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Terminal Sizing
1.5
Background
Terminal Functionality & Assumptions • High Level Size Range outlined in the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Report #25 (Airport Terminal Planning and Design, Volume 1) • Methodology premised on number of square feet per narrow body aircraft gate • ACRP planning assumption: Small domestic airports = 15,000 to 18,000 square feet per narrow body gate • ASE currently operates with 8 gates • Master Plan recommended 10 gates: Larger CS-100s can be accommodated with 8-10 gates in the planning years (2023, 2028, 2033) • ACRP Industry Standard Sizing Range (high level) • Conditions Today (CRJ-700): 90,000-108,000 • 6 gates x 15,000 square feet per gate and 6 gates x 18,000 square feet per gate • Future Conditions (2028): 8 gates with CS-100 aircraft: 120,000 – 144,000 • 8 gates x 15,000 sq. ft. per gate and 8 gates x 18,000 square feet per gate • Future Conditions (2033): 10 gates with CS-100 aircraft): 150,000 – 180,000 • 10 gates x 15,000 sq. ft. per gate and 10 gates x 18,000 square feet per gate • Based on local conditions, EA will examine approximately 140,000 square feet in terms of footprint and visual impacts
• NOTE: These are planning level estimates based off industry standards for the purpose of the EA (environmentally clearing the space); not a design process or decision point • Terminal programming during subsequent design phase will update numbers for each terminal space specific to Aspen to ensure functional needs, community compatibility and compliant with FAA requirements • BOCC will make a decision on size during terminal programming design phases with robust community involvement
Aviation Activity Forecast Table (2015-2033) *NOTE: 2014 Air Service Study identified the 737 as potentially performance capable under D-III standards (note yet confirmed by airlines); Fleet mix assumes a small number of these operations to be conservative
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Environmental Consequences
2.1
Analysis
Environmental Categories Categories to Evaluate per FAA Order 1050.1F Include : • Air Quality
• Land Use
• Biological Resources
• Natural Resources and Energy Supply
• Climate
• Noise and Noise-Compatible Land Use
• Coastal Resources
• Socioeconomics Impacts, Environmental Justice,
• Department of Transportation Act: Section 4(f)
and Children’s Environmental Health and Safety
• Farmlands
Risks
• Hazardous Materials, Pollution Prevention, and
• Visual Effects
Solid Waste
• Water Resources (Wetlands, Floodplains and Wild and Scenic Rivers)
• Historical, Architectural, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources
• Cumulative Impacts
• Green highlights denotes categories with preliminary environmental consequences available today; remaining categories will be addressed in a subsequent public meeting • Farmlands: All area is per-disturbed, no prime farmlands impacted • Coastal Resources: Area is 500+ miles from the nearest coastal area; no impacts
Natural Resources & Energy Supply • Runway Alternatives • Increased water usage and fuel consumption would occur during construction. This usage would be temporary and is not expected to place undue stress on the environment. • Sustainable Construction Management Plan: Techniques would be employed for conservation of resources and energy. • No long-term net increase of energy use • Terminal Alternatives • Increased water usage and fuel consumption would occur during construction. This usage would be temporary and is not expected to place undue stress on the environment. • Energy use: • Terminal size would increase however, terminal has option to increase energy efficiency/integration of renewable energy options • No significant impact on energy resources expected
Hazardous Materials & Pollution Prevention Summary • Runway and Terminal Alternatives • The Alternatives are not expected to change the handling, use or disposal of hazardous materials and waste • No known hazardous waste sites would be impacted • Construction activities could generate hazardous waste as materials commonly consist of paint, oil, solvents, etc. and solid waste. Impacts would be temporary and not significant • No long term increases in solid waste expected. Terminal expansion would meet existing demand • Solid waste would increase during construction: • Landfill has a 15 year lifespan • Sustainable Construction Management Plan would be followed to reduce solid waste creation during construction
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Environmental Consequences
2.2
Analysis
Historical, Architectural, Archaeological & Cultural Resources • Runway Alternative • A historic property, Airport Ranch, sits near the project site. While not on the National Register of Historic Places, the ranch was determined eligible in 1988 • The ranch is located outside the Area of Potential Effect, and is not expected to incur impacts • Terminal Alternatives • No historic or historically eligible properties exist on the east side • Therefore, no impacts to historically eligible properties
Historic Area of Potential Effect
Department of Transportation Section 4(f) • Section 4(f) resources include publicly owned parks, recreation areas, wildlife or waterfowl refuges, or lands of historic sites that are of national, state, or local significance. • Runway Alternative • A historic property, Airport Ranch, sits near the project site. The historic property is located outside the Area of Potential Effect, and would not incur impacts • Approximately 1,657 feet of Owl Creek Bike Path would be relocated between 13 feet and 58 feet to the west, outside of the Object Free Area • Temporary closure during construction • No long term impact on the bike path, its uses or users • Terminal Alternatives • No negative Impacts
Bike Path & Owl Creek Road Relocation
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
Visual Background
2.3
Analysis
Summary of Visioning Meeting The vision session occurred in February 2015 and was organized into (4) areas for discussion:
1. “SENSE OF PLACE” 2. “SUSTAINABILITY” 3. “NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY” 4. “PASSENGER EXPERIENCE” During the open house, we documented community input, insights and consolidated the comments into general themes.
Evaluation Criteria Strong Indoor-Outdoor Relationship Reflecting Community Vision Optimizing Views Sustainable Design Prioritizing the Passenger Experience Being a Good Neighbor Build it Once, Build it Right
General Themes “A Balanced Approach” • Economic lifeline • Operational efficiency • Good neighbor • Part of the community • Build it once, build it right “Embrace the Outdoors” • Views • Inside / outside spaces “The Gateway Experience” • Reflect the community vision “Connectivity to the Community” • Ground transportation / accessibility
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
What’s Happened
2.4
Analysis
Site Influencing Factors - Horizontal Our area of study for a new terminal and associated site operations (parking / access/ enplanement strategy) is bound by the proposed runway changes and Highway 82. SEE SHEET 3 OF 23
Section A TERMINAL AREA PLAN IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 3 OF 23)
UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE
Area of Study HWY 82
GSE BUILDING
RSA
RSA
TOFA ROFA
RSA
T/W
A5
CS100
1 CS
CS100
CS100
CS100
RSA
ROFA
ROFA
T/W B8
320' TOFA
RSA
TOFA RSA
RSA
T/W B9
150'
RUNWAY 15/33
RSA
T/W A9
RSA
TOFA RSA
TOFA
ROFA TOFA
00
CS100
TAXIWAY A
TAXIWAY A
TAXIWAY B TAXIWAY B
ROFA
TOFA
ROFA
TOFA
ROFA
TOFA
ROFA
50'
RSA
400'
blincoln
TOFA
AOC
50'
May 28, 2014 - 8:39am
ROFA
150'
RUNWAY 15/33
TAXILANE A
ROFA
T/W A8
RSA
T/W A3
RSA
400'
NORTH GA RAMP IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 4 OF 23)
ROFA
TOFA
T/W A7
TAXILANE A
ROFA
T/W A1
RSA
Y 82
TOFA
TOFA
400'
ROFA
00
CS1
T/W A6
TOFA
320'
ROFA
F.B.O.
T/W A4
EXTENDED TAXIWAY A
SOUTH GA RAMP IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 3 AND 4 OF 23)
HW
FAA
T/W A2
TOFA
HANGAR
CS100
EXTENDED T-SHADE HANGARS
TERMINAL
HANGAR
TO
FA
TOFA
OWL CREEK ROAD
OWL CREEK
I:\Projects\ASE\Engineering\ASE LOC 14-01 - Future Air Service Study - Phase II\Phase II\Phase II alternatives\ASE 14-01 ALT 12.dwg
F.B.O. WEST SIDE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS (SEE SHEET 4 OF 23)
ROAD
N
AIRPORT RANCH
Aerial Map with Area of Study Highlighted
SHEET 4 OF 23 *Based on Masterplan Update Aspen/Pitkin County AirportSEE(12/2012)
MASTER PLAN COMPARISON TO PROPOSED LAYOUT FROM STUDY IMPACTS - CURRENT PROPOSED MASTER PLAN LAYOUT TERMINAL AREA/COMMERCIAL RAMP SOUTH AND NORTH GA RAMP WEST SIDE DEVELOPMENT
- ALL RSA'S, ROFA'S, AND TOFA'S SHOWN ARE FOR PROPOSED AIRCRAFT PAVEMENT PROPOSED AIRFIELD AND ROAD LAYOUT FROM AIR SERVICE STUDY ASE PROPERTY LINE BURLINGAME RANCH PROPERTY LINE CDOT PROPERTY LINE HIGHWAY 82 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACK
LEGEND ®
MASTER PLAN LAYOUT AIRCRAFT PAVEMENT MASTER PLAN LAYOUT BUILDINGS
GRAPHIC SCALE 300
MASTER PLAN LAYOUT ROADWAYS AND PARKING LOTS
0
300
600
( IN FEET )
900 S. BROADWAY SUITE 350 PHONE: 303-524-3030
DENVER, CO 80209 FAX: 303-534-3031
WWW.JVIATION.COM
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT ASPEN, COLORADO FUTURE AIR SERVICE STUDY - PHASE II ALTERNATIVE 12 DATE: MAY 30, 2014
SHEET 2 OF 23
Site Section A
Site Influencing Factors - Vertical The general topography of the valley has an overall effect of making the airport slope at an average of 2% consistently along the runway which impacts the terminal planning.
3D Diagram A | Airfield-to-Apron
3D Diagram B | Apron-to-Landside
3D Diagram A & B (see above)
N
3D Diagram Overall Airport Topography
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
What’s Happened
2.5
Analysis
Existing Neighborhood Views
1 | view from Trentaz Road
1 | night view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound 1 | view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
2
Concept 1 “The Ridge”
3.1
Building Concepts
Terminal Layout
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
340’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
CURBSIDE VIEW OPPORTUNITY
PARKING
GATE LOUNGE TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
HWY 82
145’-0”
Site Section Typical East-West
L S
OU B
CURBSIDE
LOADING/ STORAGE
AIRLINE OPS
TSA BAG SCREEN
AIRPORT ADMIN.
AIRLINE TICKET OFFICE
CIRCULATION / RESTROOMS
TICKETING
BAGGAGE CLAIM
SECURITY CHECKPOINT
OUTBOUND BAGGAGE
Plan Legend MECHANICAL
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
Level 1
CURBSIDE
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE
OPEN TO BELOW
INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
GATE LOUNGE
APRON
Level 2
Plan Diagrams
RFTA Station RFTA Station
Long Term
Short Term
Employee
Rental Ready
Rental Car Service Long Term
Commercial Apron
Site Plan Conceptual Layout
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
2
3.2
Concept 1 “The Ridge”
Building Concepts
Perspectives A Site integration achieves a smaller scale while capitalizing on thermal mass of the ground B Low profile roof “hugs” the landscape to create a neighborhood scale C Potential green roof patio provides an extended outdoor experience D Structure & building form respond to internal program & spatial needs E Interconnected spaces create layered views & intuitive wayfinding F Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
F
B
D C F
E
A
Building Cross Section | looking north
A Pedestrian-scale approach & curbside experience B Low profile roof “hugs” the landscape to create a neighborhood scale C Landscaped area provides an extended outdoor experience D Southeast corner lifts to frame views of Buttermilk Ski Area E Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
D B
E
E A C
Building Exterior | looking northwest
A Framed view to Buttermilk Ski Area B Landscaped area provides an extended outdoor experience C Building form allows ticketing, bag claim & gate lounge to share volume, daylight & views D Amenities & seating in non-secure area creates a relaxed & pleasant public space
C
A
B
D
Building Interior | looking south
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
2
Concept 1 “The Ridge”
3.3
Building Concepts
Neighborhood Views
1 | view from Trentaz Road
1 | night view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound 1 | view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
2
Concept 2 “The Pavilion”
4.1
Building Concepts
Terminal Layout
340’-0”
CDOT ROW
CDOT RESERVED CORRIDOR
APRON
TOFA
175’-0”
100’-0” 120’-0”
CURBSIDE VIEW OPPORTUNITY
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
GATE LOUNGE
PARKING
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
TICKETING / BAG CLAIM
MECH
HWY 82
145’-0”
Site Section Typical East-West
L S
OU B
CURBSIDE
LOADING/ STORAGE
ENTRY PLAZA AIRLINE OPS
AIRPORT ADMIN.
AIRLINE TICKET OFFICE
CIRCULATION / RESTROOMS
TICKETING
TSA BAG SCREEN
SECURITY CHECKPOINT
OUTBOUND BAGGAGE
BAGGAGE CLAIM
Plan Legend MECHANICAL
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
Level 1
CURBSIDE
DEPARTING PASSENGER ARRIVING PASSENGER OUTBOUND BAGGAGE INBOUND BAGGAGE VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
GATE LOUNGE
APRON
Level 2
Plan Diagrams
RFTA Station RFTA Station
Long Term
Short Term
Employee
Rental Ready
Rental Car Service Long Term
Commercial Apron
Site Plan Conceptual Layout
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
2
Concept 2 “The Pavilion”
4.2
Building Concepts
Perspectives A Site integration achieves a smaller scale while capitalizing on thermal mass of the ground B Expansive views from gate lounge C Potential green roof patio provides an extended outdoor experience D Skylights optimize natural daylight E Entry plaza creates a welcoming & pleasant public space F Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
F
F B
C F
D
E
A
Building Cross Section | looking north
A Stepped building massing reduces building scale B Entry plaza creates a welcoming & pleasant public space C Potential green roof patio provides an extended outdoor experience D Southeast corner lifts to frame views of Buttermilk Ski Area E Overhangs protect passengers from the elements, limit light pollution & solar gain, and maximize natural daylight
D A C
E
E
B
B
Building Exterior | looking northwest
A Skylights optimize natural daylight B Amenities & seating in non-secure area creates a relaxed & pleasant public space C Entry plaza creates a welcoming public space, as well as a setting for local artist, interactive amenities & events
A
C
B
Building Interior | looking south
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
C
2
Concept 2 “The Pavilion”
4.3
Building Concepts
Neighborhood Views
1 | view from Trentaz Road
1 | night view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound 1 | view from Trentaz Road
2 | view from McLain Flats Road
6 | view from CO-82 south bound
5 | view from Owl Creek Road
4 | view from W Buttermilk Road
for more information:
add to the conversation online:
http://www.aspenairport.com
http://www.pitkincountyconnect.com
3 | view from CO-82 north bound
