1975

Report 2 Downloads 131 Views
Success of Point Barrow Shipping Transits

Alexander Brovkin – Tri Ocean Engineering Ltd. Chris Hill - Canatec Associates International Ltd. Frank Bercha – The Bercha Group

Presented to SNAME Arctic Section 21 December 2005

Point Barrow

2

Key Factors of Successful Transit 1. 2. 3. 4.

Transport method considerations during the design of Cargo Properly selected marine transportation equipment Properly selected icebreaking support vessels Precise location of shear boundary and seabed bathymetry for route selection 5. Confirmation of ice-free window availability for the time of transit:  Analysis of Historical Data  Estimate of invasion of first year, second year or multi-year ice into the ice-free transportation window due to currents and winds  Ongoing observations on area ice dynamics

6. Quantitative risk analysis of a transit around Point Barrow in specific year 7. Probabilistic analysis of a successful transit based on best estimates of Monte Carlo simulation 8. Precise planning of the voyage 9. Real time observation (any type of ice management) 10. Back-up Planning 3

“Inside Passage” (Depth less than 10 m) Voyages Around Point Barrow  Started in 19th Century for whale hunt  Early 20th Century to 1950’s very few transits  1950’s DEW Line Construction Activities along the Alaskan and Canadian Beaufort Shorelines  1958-1968 successful voyages made by Crowley each year  Starting in 1968 with oil discoveries in Prudhoe Bay and for almost 50 year now successful sealifts accomplished on a yearly basis 4

“Inside Passage” (Depth less than 10 m) Volumes of Cargo Delivered  Alaskan DEW Line Construction (1958-1983)  Crowley used 280 Tugs and 250 barges  Tonnage almost 2,300,000 tonnes

 Oil and Gas Equipment to Prudhoe Bay (1968-1983)  Crowley used 240 Tugs and 260 barges  Tonnage roughly 1,000,000 tonnes

 ATL move of 4 Tarsiut caissons from Vancouver to Canadian Beaufort (August of 1981)  ATL dry tow of Esso’s CRI from Wainwright to Tuk (August of 1982)  Crowley move of Northstar Modules for BP in 20012002 (largest module of 3,500 tons) … and many more 5

Deeper Water Passage (over 10 meters depth)

 Initial mobilizations of SSDC, CIDS, Molikpaq Platforms  Multiple SSDC/Mat tows out and back into the Beaufort Sea.  Tow of “Canmar Explorer” in 1994

 Mobilization of the Molikpaq and CIDS (“Orlan”) Platforms to Sakhalin Island Offshore 6

Self-Propelled Operation to Enter the Beaufort Sea

 Big Lift 2001 Happy-R Vessel transported 3 small barges to Tuk

 No icebreaking assistance was provided 7

1975 !!

 1975 – inside passage or nearshore passage did not open 8

1975 !!

 1975 - heavy ice conditions delayed the entry by almost 2 months

9

1975 !!

 1975 – not all planned 155,000 tonnes tonnage made through 10

1975 !!

REASONS: Late break-up, Summer Ice Intrusions, and early freeze-up 11

Situations Similar to 2003 years

A wedge of heavy ice temporarily block the route at the level of Barter Island

12

Shallow Water “Inside” Passage vs. Deeper Water Passage OFFSHORE PACK

Arctic Ocean

Point Barrow

Chukchi Sea 2 -3 nm

SHEAR ZONE ICE SHORE FAST ICE

Beaufort Sea

1- several nm (1.5-2 m thick)

20 meter 10 meter 13

Shallow Water “Inside” Passage vs. Deeper Water Passage

 NOAA scene showing fast ice, First-year ice and old pack ice.

Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, 29 December 1987; Yukon and NWT. 14

Marine Equipment Selection and Cargo Configuration

CARGO COG - ? WEIGHT - ?

DRAFT 7' UKC Vessel Blue Marlin Black Marlin Mighty Servant 1 Mighty Servant 3

Max Draft, DWT, m 1000 tons 10.3 78 10.11 57 8.77 40 9.06 29

UKC, m

Depth, m

2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1

12.4 12.21 10.87 11.16

15

Icebreakers Support Inside Passage

Deeper Passage

16

Analysis of Historical Data U.S. National Ice Center weekly ice charts

17

Analysis of Historical Data Archived satellite data High frequency of coverage and low cost of acquisition

Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, 29 December 1987; Yukon and NWT. 18

Analysis of Historical Data Archived satellite data High frequency of coverage and low cost of acquisition

NOAA weather satellite scene 30 June 2005

19

Analysis of Historical Data Leads in ice Data extracted from weather satellite images. (MMS, 2005)

20

Analysis of Historical Data

Zones used in extracting lead data from satellite images (MMS, 2005).

21

Probability of Occurrence Determination of the ice parameters of interest affecting potential transit corridors. •Multi-year ice •Second-year ice •First-year ice •Open water •Extreme ice features

22

Probability of Occurrence

Multi-year hummock field

Ice island fragments 23

Probability of Occurrence Example of open water along the Alaskan coast east of Point Barrow, i.e. outside the Point Barrow transit zone but along a possible corridor to a destination site.

© 2001 CSA/ASC 24

Shear Zone Boundary

Shear of gyre against landfast ice creates significant ridges east of Point Barrow. (map Mahoney et al., 2005)

25

Shear Zone Boundary Recent literature (POAC 05 and MMS). Probability of landfast ice occurrence between October and July (Mahoney et al., 2005).

26

Forecasting Ice Dynamics Requirements: •Advance development and testing of regional/local forecast mechanism. •Good data on area marine forces. •Accurate regional weather forecasts. •Consistent and frequent feedback from field.

27

Forecasting Ice Dynamics

28

Forecasting Ice Dynamics

Example of forecast local ice drift superimposed on same-day satellite picture.

29

Forecasting Ice Dynamics

Example of tabular ice forecast report form

30

Probabilistic Analysis Simulation of transits using Monte Carlo or other models. Requires input data set including following parameters:

•Historical ice concentration •Historical level ice thickness •Historical ridge/hummock/rubble data

•Index of distances covered by various combinations of ice parameters.

31

Schedule Risk Analysis General Approaches  Data and information.  Probabilistic model constructed for activity time and cost variations.  Main stakeholders interviewed.  Principal schedule scenarios identified and modelled as Cases.  Case schedule and cost probability distributions.  Project composite schedule and cost probability distributions.

32

Risk Analysis

CASES  CASE 1 General

 Routine delays without qualitative changes in schedule.

 CASE 2 Barrow Closed

 Sealift impossible resulting in at least one year project delay.

 CASE 3 Gravel Permit Delay

 CASE 4 Winter Activity Delayed

 Pad construction delayed one year.

 Reduction of winter construction window duration. 33

Cumulative Distribution for Total Cost – Case 1

34

Cumulative Distribution for Expected Total Cost

35

Risk Analysis SUMMARY

Planned Cost (US $MM)

Total Prob. Cost (US $MM) Mean

Weight

1 – General

651.90

676.06

0.545

2 – Barrow Closed

651.90

676.06

0.030

3 – Gravel Permit Delay

651.90

706.06

0.300

4 – Winter Activity Delays

651.90

686.28

0.125

Case

Total Expected Cost (US $MM) – Probability Mean

686.42 36

Choosing the Optima Time of transit: Period of the year, to maximize mobilization costs.

Final routeing: Dependent on master’s judgement and developing ice and weather conditions.

37

Real Time Monitoring

© 2001 CSA/ASC 38

Real Time Monitoring •High quality daily weather reports. •High quality weather forecasts •Daily satellite coverage, cloud permitting. •Pre-arranged radar satellite coverage for difficult transit legs.

39

Closing 

Utilize results of work done in the past

 Changes in environment and technology call for revisiting of the transit issues  To achieve best results the work should be organized and implemented in a structured manner  Use of local and current knowledge

40

Sources of Data and Information

 SNAME Arctic Section Archives  Canatec Associates International Ltd.  Bercha Group Thank You and Merry Christmas !! 41

Recommend Documents