2at1.2a12 ratings based on school year 2010.2011 data . district
Distr¡ct Status Deta¡l
1t26t2017
RATTNG
yEA* i-¡,'-..
1
_ir
__
l_.
I
\-1
iit{tt'¡
Financial Integr¡ty Rat¡ng System of Texas
2AT1.2A12 RATINGS BASED ON SCHOOL YEAR 2010.2011 DATA STATUS DETAIL Name: RAINS ISD{ 19O9O3)
Publication Level t : 2/2e12O14 3:36:50
PM
Status: Passed
Publication Level 2: 2l2e/2OL4 3:36:55
PM
Rat¡ng: Above Standard Ach¡evement
Last Updated: 2/28/2014 3:36:55
Þ¡str¡ct Score: 62
Passing Score: 52
PM
Ind¡cator Description 1
. DISTRICT
Updated
Score
Was The Total Fund Balance Less Nonspendable and Restricted Fund Balance Greater Than Zero In
6lrs/20t2
Yes
Ihe General Fund?
4:2Q:34 PM
2
J
Was the Total Unrestricted Net Asset Balance (Net of Accretion of Interest on Capit Bonds) ìn the Governmental Activities Column in the Statement of Net Assets Greater than Zero? (If the District's 5 Year yo Chanoe in Students was 10olo more) Were There No Disclosures In The Annual Financial Report And/Or Other Sources Of Information Concerninq Default On Bonded Indebtedness Obliqations?
6/ly2At2
Yes
4:2û'.34 PM
6/
ry2at2
Yes
4:20:35 PM
4
Was The Annual Financial Reoort Filed Within One Month After November 27th or Januarv 28th Deadline Dependino Upon The District's Fiscal Year End Date (June 30th or Auqust 3lst)?
61
15/2012
Yes
4:20:35 Pfv
5
Was There An Unoualified Opinion in Annual Financial Repod?
6/7s/2_012
Yes
4:2A:35 PM
t)
Did The Annual Financial Reoo¡t Not Disclose Anv Instancels) Of Material Weaknesses ln Internal Controls?
6/\V2AL2 4:2O:35 PM
Multiplier Sum
7
Was The Three-Year Averaoe Percent Of Total Tax Collections (Includino Delinquent) Greater Than
6/ |s/20t2
9Bo/o?
4:2A:36
5
PM
B
9
Did The Comparison Of PEIMS Data To L¡ke Information In Annual Financial ReÞort Result In An Aqqreqate Variance Of Less Than 3 Percent Of Expend¡tures Per Fund Tvpe (Data Oualitv
6175/2012 4:2O:36
Measure)
PM
?
Were Debt Related Expenditures (Net Of IFA And/Or EDA Allotment) < $350.00 Per Student?
http:i/tea4avwayl on.tea.state.tx. uslfi rsVF orm s/D i stri ct.aspx
(If
6l t5/2012
0
3
1t3
District Status Detail
1t26t2017
The D¡strict's Five-Year Percent Chanoe In Students = Or > 7olo, Or Pennv Of Tax Effort > $200.000 Per Student) 10
If
ProÞeftv Taxes Collected Per
Was There No Disclosure In The Annual Audit Reoort Of Material Noncompliance?
4:24:36 PM
6/ls/2012
5
4:2A:37 PM
11
Did The District Have Full Accreditat¡on Status In Relat¡on To Financial Manaqement Practices? (e.o. No Conservator Or Monitor Ass¡oned)
qrv2at2 4'.2O:37 PM
L2
Was The Aqoreoate Of Budoeted Expenditures And Other Uses Less Than The Aqoreaate Of Total Revenues, Other Resources and Fund Balance In General Fund?
6/1512012 4:2O:37
5
PM
13
L4
15
6lts/zjtz
If The District's Aqoreqate Fund Balance In The General Fund And Capital Proiects Fund Was Less Than Zero, Were Construction Proiects Adeouatelv Financed? lTo Avoid Creatinq Or Addinq To The Fund Balance Deficit Situation)
4:2O:38
Was The Ratio Of Cash And Investments To Deferred Revenues (Excludino Amount Eoual To Net Delinouent Taxes Receivable) In The General Fund Greater Than Or Eoual To 1:1? (If Deferred Revenues Are Less Than Net Delinouent Taxes Receivable)
4:2O:38
Was The Administrative Cost Ratio Less Than The Threshold Ratio?
6/|s/2012
5
PM
6/15/2012
5
PM
5
4:20:38 PM
Ib
Was The Rat¡o Of Students To Teachers W¡th¡n the Ranoes Shown Below Accord¡nq To District Síze?
qls/2a12
5
4:24:39 PM
t7
Was The Ratio Of Students To Total Size?
Staff Within the Ranqes Shown Below Accordino To District
6/r512072
4
4:24:'39 PM
1B
Was The Decrease In Undesionated Unreserved Fund Balance < 20olo Over Two Fiscal Years?(lf Total Revenues > Operatino Exoenditures In The General Fund.Then District Receives 5 Points)
61lsl2012
5
4:20:39 PM
19
Was The Aqoreqate Total Of Cash And Investments In The General Fund More Than $0?
6ltsl2012
(
4:20:39 PM
2A
Were Investment Earninqs In All Funds (Excludins Debt Service Fund and Capital Proiects Fund) Meet or Exceed the 3-Month Treasurv B¡ll Rate?
6l rs/2012
5
4:2A:40 PM
ó¿
Weighted Sum
1
Multiplìer Sum
62 Score
DETERMINATION OF RATING A.
Did the d¡strict answer 'No' to lndicators L, 2, 3, or ratlng is Substandard Achievement.
http://tea4avwayl on.tea.state.b
1t26t2017
RATTNG
yEA* i-¡,'-..
1
_ir
__
l_.
I
\-1
iit{tt'¡
Financial Integr¡ty Rat¡ng System of Texas
2AT1.2A12 RATINGS BASED ON SCHOOL YEAR 2010.2011 DATA STATUS DETAIL Name: RAINS ISD{ 19O9O3)
Publication Level t : 2/2e12O14 3:36:50
PM
Status: Passed
Publication Level 2: 2l2e/2OL4 3:36:55
PM
Rat¡ng: Above Standard Ach¡evement
Last Updated: 2/28/2014 3:36:55
Þ¡str¡ct Score: 62
Passing Score: 52
PM
Ind¡cator Description 1
. DISTRICT
Updated
Score
Was The Total Fund Balance Less Nonspendable and Restricted Fund Balance Greater Than Zero In
6lrs/20t2
Yes
Ihe General Fund?
4:2Q:34 PM
2
J
Was the Total Unrestricted Net Asset Balance (Net of Accretion of Interest on Capit Bonds) ìn the Governmental Activities Column in the Statement of Net Assets Greater than Zero? (If the District's 5 Year yo Chanoe in Students was 10olo more) Were There No Disclosures In The Annual Financial Report And/Or Other Sources Of Information Concerninq Default On Bonded Indebtedness Obliqations?
6/ly2At2
Yes
4:2û'.34 PM
6/
ry2at2
Yes
4:20:35 PM
4
Was The Annual Financial Reoort Filed Within One Month After November 27th or Januarv 28th Deadline Dependino Upon The District's Fiscal Year End Date (June 30th or Auqust 3lst)?
61
15/2012
Yes
4:20:35 Pfv
5
Was There An Unoualified Opinion in Annual Financial Repod?
6/7s/2_012
Yes
4:2A:35 PM
t)
Did The Annual Financial Reoo¡t Not Disclose Anv Instancels) Of Material Weaknesses ln Internal Controls?
6/\V2AL2 4:2O:35 PM
Multiplier Sum
7
Was The Three-Year Averaoe Percent Of Total Tax Collections (Includino Delinquent) Greater Than
6/ |s/20t2
9Bo/o?
4:2A:36
5
PM
B
9
Did The Comparison Of PEIMS Data To L¡ke Information In Annual Financial ReÞort Result In An Aqqreqate Variance Of Less Than 3 Percent Of Expend¡tures Per Fund Tvpe (Data Oualitv
6175/2012 4:2O:36
Measure)
PM
?
Were Debt Related Expenditures (Net Of IFA And/Or EDA Allotment) < $350.00 Per Student?
http:i/tea4avwayl on.tea.state.tx. uslfi rsVF orm s/D i stri ct.aspx
(If
6l t5/2012
0
3
1t3
District Status Detail
1t26t2017
The D¡strict's Five-Year Percent Chanoe In Students = Or > 7olo, Or Pennv Of Tax Effort > $200.000 Per Student) 10
If
ProÞeftv Taxes Collected Per
Was There No Disclosure In The Annual Audit Reoort Of Material Noncompliance?
4:24:36 PM
6/ls/2012
5
4:2A:37 PM
11
Did The District Have Full Accreditat¡on Status In Relat¡on To Financial Manaqement Practices? (e.o. No Conservator Or Monitor Ass¡oned)
qrv2at2 4'.2O:37 PM
L2
Was The Aqoreoate Of Budoeted Expenditures And Other Uses Less Than The Aqoreaate Of Total Revenues, Other Resources and Fund Balance In General Fund?
6/1512012 4:2O:37
5
PM
13
L4
15
6lts/zjtz
If The District's Aqoreqate Fund Balance In The General Fund And Capital Proiects Fund Was Less Than Zero, Were Construction Proiects Adeouatelv Financed? lTo Avoid Creatinq Or Addinq To The Fund Balance Deficit Situation)
4:2O:38
Was The Ratio Of Cash And Investments To Deferred Revenues (Excludino Amount Eoual To Net Delinouent Taxes Receivable) In The General Fund Greater Than Or Eoual To 1:1? (If Deferred Revenues Are Less Than Net Delinouent Taxes Receivable)
4:2O:38
Was The Administrative Cost Ratio Less Than The Threshold Ratio?
6/|s/2012
5
PM
6/15/2012
5
PM
5
4:20:38 PM
Ib
Was The Rat¡o Of Students To Teachers W¡th¡n the Ranoes Shown Below Accord¡nq To District Síze?
qls/2a12
5
4:24:39 PM
t7
Was The Ratio Of Students To Total Size?
Staff Within the Ranqes Shown Below Accordino To District
6/r512072
4
4:24:'39 PM
1B
Was The Decrease In Undesionated Unreserved Fund Balance < 20olo Over Two Fiscal Years?(lf Total Revenues > Operatino Exoenditures In The General Fund.Then District Receives 5 Points)
61lsl2012
5
4:20:39 PM
19
Was The Aqoreqate Total Of Cash And Investments In The General Fund More Than $0?
6ltsl2012
(
4:20:39 PM
2A
Were Investment Earninqs In All Funds (Excludins Debt Service Fund and Capital Proiects Fund) Meet or Exceed the 3-Month Treasurv B¡ll Rate?
6l rs/2012
5
4:2A:40 PM
ó¿
Weighted Sum
1
Multiplìer Sum
62 Score
DETERMINATION OF RATING A.
Did the d¡strict answer 'No' to lndicators L, 2, 3, or ratlng is Substandard Achievement.
http://tea4avwayl on.tea.state.b
