“General Approach to Individually Dispersed, Highly Soluble, and ...

Supporting Information for

“General Approach to Individually Dispersed, Highly Soluble, and Conductive Graphene Nanosheets Functionalized by Nitrene Chemistry” Hongkun He and Chao Gao* MOE Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Synthesis and Functionalization, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China. *Correspondence to [email protected] (C.G.) Synthesis of Azido-Terminated Poly(ethylene glycol) (Az-PEG). Under nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring, DCC (7.08 g, 34.3 mmol), PEG-OH (Mn = 350, 750, or 1900 g/mol, 28.6 mmol), and DMAP (0.42 g, 3.4 mmol) were added into freshly distilled dichloromethane (100 mL). After the flask was immersed into an ice-water bath, Az-COOH (6.41 g, 34.3 mmol) was added. After 48 h, the reaction mixture was vacuum filtered and washed successively with 1M HCl solution, 1M NaOH solution, and deionized water. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 overnight, filtered, concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and dried under vacuum to give a yellow oil (Az-PEG350, AzPEG750)

or

white

solid

(Az-PEG1900).

1

H

NMR

(CDCl3,

δ,

ppm):

4.25

(m,

CH2OOCCH2CH2COOCH2), 3.64 (CH2 of PEG), 3.48 (t, CH2N3), 3.37 (s, OCH3), 2.68 (m, OOCCH2CH2COO). Synthesis of Azido-Terminated Long Alkyl Chain (Az-C16). Under nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring, DCC (9.08 g, 44 mmol), Az-OH (6.96 g, 80 mmol), and DMAP (0.538 g, 4.4 mmol) were added into freshly distilled dichloromethane (100 mL). After the flask was immersed into an icewater bath, palmitic acid (10.24 g, 40 mmol) was added. After 30 h, the reaction mixture was vacuum filtered and washed successively with 1M HCl solution, 1M NaOH solution, and deionized water. The organic phase was concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and dried under vacuum to give a white solid. 1

H NMR (CDCl3, δ, ppm): 4.25 (t, CH2CH2N3), 3.47 (t, CH2N3), 2.35 (t, CH2COO), 1.64 (m,

CH2CH2COO), 1.25 (b, (CH2)12), 0.88 (t, CH3).

S1

Figure S1. AFM images of G-N-COOH (a), G-N-Br (b), G-N-OH (c), G-N-NH2 (d), G-N-PEG350 (e), and G-N-PEG750 (f). c

b

a

f

e

h= 2.79 nm

μm

μm

μm

d

h= 3.50 nm

h= 3.14 nm

h= 1.98 nm

h= 2.09 nm

μm

nm

S2

h= 5.10 nm

μm

Figure S2. SEM images of G-N-COOH (a,b), G-N-NH2 (c), G-N-PS (d), G-N-PEG1900 (e,f), G-NPEG750 (g,h), and G-N-PEG350 (i,j). The images in the right column (b, d, f, h, and j) are SEM sideview images of filtered films. a

b

50 μm

1 μm

d

c

20 μm

1 μm

e

f

2 μm

g

10 μm

h

2 μm

i

20 μm

j

5 μm

5 μm

S3

Figure S3. TEM images of G-N-OH (a,b), G-N-COOH (c,d), G-N-PS (e,f), G-N-C16 (g), G-N-Br-gPS (h,i), G-N-Br (j,k), G-N-NH2 (l,m), and G-N-NH2-g-C16 (n,o). . a

c

b

0.5 μm

d

0.5 μm

200 nm

f

e

200 nm

200 nm

g

200 nm

i

h

500 nm

200 nm

500 nm

S4

Figure S3 continued j

k

l

m

n

o

S5

Figure S4. The XRD (a) and EDS (b) results of G-N-COOH-Fe3O4, and photographs of G-N-COOHFe3O4 in DMF before and after being separated by an external magnetic field (c).

a

Intensity (a.u.)

(311)

C (111)

(220) (511) (440)

(400)

(422)

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2 Theta (degree)

b

Intensity (a.u.)

C

Cu

Fe

O Fe

0

Cu

Fe

2

4

6 keV

c

S6

8

10

Figure S5. (a-c) TEM images of G-N-COOH-Fe3O4. (d-f) TEM images of G-N-OH-“Fe3O4” obtained in the control experiment using G-N-OH instead of G-N-COOH as the starting material.

a)

0.5 μm

d)

0.5 μm

b)

c)

100 nm

50 nm

f)

e)

50 nm

100 nm

S7

Figure S6. FTIR spectra of GO, f-GNs, and modified f-GNs. b

Intensity (a.u.)

Intensity (a.u.)

a

GO G-N-NH2

GO G-N-OH G-N-OH-g-PCL

4000

3000

2000

G-N-NH2-g-C16

4000

1000

3000

2000

1000 -1

Wavenumber (cm )

-1

Wavenumber (cm )

c

Intensity (a.u.)

Intensity (a.u.)

d

GO G-N-Br G-N-Br-g-PS G-N-PS

GO G-N-COOH

4000

3000

2000

4000

1000 -1

Intensity (a.u.)

GO G-N-PEG350 G-N-PEG750 G-N-PEG1900

3000

2500

2000

1500 -1

2500

2000

1500

Wavenumber (cm )

e

3500

3000

-1

Wavenumber (cm )

4000

3500

1000

500

Wavenumber (cm )

S8

1000

500

Figure S7. FTIR spectra of Az-PEG350 (a), Az-PEG750 (b), Az-PEG1900 (c), Az-C16 (d), Az-PS (e), and GPC curve of Az-PS (f). a

Intensity (a.u.)

Intensity (a.u.)

b

2104 -N3 4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

2104 -N3

1500

1000

4000

500

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

-1

-1

Wavenumber (cm )

Wavenumber (cm )

c

Intensity (a.u.)

Intensity (a.u.)

d

2106 -N3

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

3500

500

2106 -N3

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

-1

Wavenumber (cm )

-1

Wavenumber (cm )

e Intensity (a.u.)

f

4000

2104 -N3

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

3

500

10

-1

Wavenumber (cm )

4

10

Molecular Weight (g/mol)

S9

500

G-N-Br

G-N-NH2

G-N-COOH

G-N-OH

GO

S10

toluene

n-hexane

chloroform

methanol

ethanol

ethylene glycol

THF

acetone

NMP

DMF

DMSO

water

Figure S8. The photographs of GO, f-GNs, modified f-GNs and reduced GO in various solvents.

G-N-PEG1900

G-N-PEG750

G-N-PEG350

G-N-PS

G-N-C16

S11

toluene

n-hexane

chloroform

methanol

ethanol

ethylene glycol

THF

acetone

NMP

DMF

DMSO

water

Figure S8 continued

Reduced GO

G-N-Br-g-PS

G-N-NH2-g-C16 G-N-OH-g-PCL

S12

toluene

n-hexane

chloroform

methanol

ethanol

ethylene glycol

THF

acetone

NMP

DMF

DMSO

water

Figure S8 continued