Attachment A & B - AWS
Attachment A & B Amador County Airport Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Narrative Report with ALP Drawing Set October 17, 2017
Scope of Work INTRODUCTION The objective of this effort is to update the Amador County Airport (JAQ), Airport Layout Plan (ALP) drawing set (ALP) and provide a narrative report (Narrative Report) supporting the proposed changes and/or revisions to the ALP. The narrative report will focus on the facility changes and development direction of the airport that has occurred since the preparation of the previous Airport Layout Plan. The ALP Narrative Report will include the identification of future facility needs, and capital improvement scheduling and costs. The ALP Narrative Report and the updated ALP drawing set will also reflect new policies and development direction provided by Amador County. The Consultant will prepare the Narrative Report, including the ALP update, in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements, including Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans (as amended), AC 150/5300-13A, Airport Design (as amended), and guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout plan as defined by the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (October 1, 2013). Task 1.1 Inventory Physical Facilities Description: Perform complete inventory of physical facilities and land uses which presently exist within the boundaries of the airport. The inventory will include an examination of plans and documents as well as a thorough on-site inspection of each physical facility to determine its type, size, and use with specific emphasis on facilities that have changed since the preparation of the previous ALP. The work effort will make maximum use of existing information available in the Airport and Amador County offices. The following relevant areas are included as a minimum:
List of Fixed Based Operators (FBOs) and services provided Supplementary facilities (other businesses on airport)
Task 1.2 Evaluate Existing Documents Description: Evaluate in detail existing documents and previous planning efforts for their adaptability or use in developing the Narrative Report. These documents will include previous airport studies, area development plans, local and regional aviation forecasts and planning, comprehensive land use plans, and such other documentation as available. Consultant shall obtain and review previous construction as-built drawings, obstruction surveys, and other available plans, drawings, specifications, etc. applicable to the airport, etc. Note: Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP is currently being updated by Amador County). Task 1.3 Obtain New Aerial Photograph and Mapping/Aeronautical Survey Description: The Consultant will assemble new digital electronic color aerial photography and new topographic/planimetric and obstruction mapping of the Airport and its environs in accordance with FAA Advisory Circulars 150/5300-16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys: Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; 150/530017A,General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and
Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; and 150/5300- 18B, General Guidance And Specifications For Submission Of Aeronautical Surveys To NGS: Field Data Collection And Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards. Topographic and planimetric mapping of the surrounding area and aerial photography of the airport including existing and potential future airport property, as well as the inner approach surface areas, will be obtained by the Consultant. The digital color aerial photography will be used for base mapping and exhibits. The horizontal datum will be NAD83 and the vertical datum will be NAVD88. Submit a Survey Work and Quality Control Plan as well as an Imagery Acquisition Plan to the Airport Surveying – GIS Program Manager via the Airports Geographic Information System website at http://airports-gis.faa.gov for review and approval. Tie the airport survey to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) using a permanent connection processed according to AC 150/5300-16. The survey data collected during the survey project will be formatted to allow the data to be digested directly into the FAA’s Airports GIS system via the FAA’s web portal in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5300-18B Table 2-1. All survey data, aerial photography, and GIS data will be provided to the Sponsor in electronic format. Task 1.4 Inventory Air Traffic Activity Description: Air traffic activity data for the airport will be assembled and organized from various sources. Relevant data on general aviation (private and corporate), air taxi, and military activity will be collected. Data will be obtained from Amador County, the FAA Regional and District Offices, CALTRANS, and Fixed Base Operators. The assembled data will include, as available: a) Historical operations, including local (touch and go) and itinerant operational splits. b) Based aircraft by type, as available. Task 1.5 Prepare Aviation Demand Forecast Description: Develop aviation demand forecasts using both simple and more complex methodologies, taking into consideration forecasts from other sources such as the FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF). Historical aviation activity statistics for the airport will be organized to evaluate airport peaking characteristics and fleet mix ratios. The methodology used in this analysis will involve a variety of techniques that will factor in national transportation statistics, local socioeconomic factors as well as the independent airport data. Correlation analysis techniques will include relatively simple graphical comparisons, as well as more complex regression analysis. Within the forecast chapter, the Consultant will provide a discussion and analysis of the methodologies which are chosen for use in this study and how they have been applied. A final refinement of activity forecasts will be conducted to integrate the effects of changing technology and will result in estimates of aviation demand for the short term (5 Years), intermediate term (10 Years), and long term (20 Years), which will be presented as follows: a) Based aircraft totals and mix. b) Annual operations by type (local, itinerant). c) Operational Mix by Type and Airport Reference Code d) Critical Design Aircraft Task 1.8 – Establish and/or Validate Airport Physical Planning Criteria Description: Identify physical facility planning criteria for use in assessing the adequacy of various airport facilities to meet demands. These criteria shall be based upon the latest FAA requirements and standards as they apply to the level of activity identified, new technology, and role of the airport. These criteria shall include dimensional standards for safety including runway length, runway separation, height restrictions, etc. In addition, these criteria shall include requirements to maintain airspace/air traffic control including approach and runway protection zones, safety areas, and other general physical area requirements such as apron, terminal/operations, access circulation and parking, hangar and services, administrative, and other
airport service and support facilities. Review current Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) and recommend changes or modifications to current ACIP to meet the requirements stated above. Task 1.9 – Update the Airport’s Recommended Development Concept Description: Based on the information developed in previous tasks as well as considering the input of Amador County, a single recommended development concept for the airport facilities will be prepared. The recommendation for the most prudent and feasible development concept will become the basis for the development of airport plans, costs, and scheduling. Task 1.10 - Prepare Capital Improvement Program Description: Prepare a recommended five-year ACIP which includes estimates of the amount of funds available from federal grant-in-aid programs to determine the net amount of capital funds required by Amador County to accomplish each proposed stage of improvements for the airport. Task 1.11 – Draft Narrative Report Description: A Narrative Report will be prepared in conformance with and meet the standards of FAA Advisory (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans. Information prepared in the preceding tasks will be incorporated into the narrative report. A draft copy of the report will be provided for the County’s review. Up to five (5) printed copies and one (1) PDF copy of the draft narrative report will be provided for this preliminary review. Task 1.12 – Coordination Meetings Description: Up to three (3) coordination meetings are budgeted for the project. One of these meetings may be held remotely using “WebEx”. The meetings can be used for coordination with, or presentations to, Amador County, Airport users, and/or FAA or other agencies as necessary. One meeting is anticipated to review the Draft Narrative Report. Task 1.13 – Final Narrative Report Description: Review comments received from the County will be incorporated into a final Narrative Report. Up to five (5) printed copies of the final Narrative Report will be provided. In addition, five (5) CD/DVD’s containing a PDF copy of the final Narrative Report will also be provided. ELEMENT 2.0 - AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN DRAWING SET The purpose of this study element is to update the set of Airport Plans for the Amador County Airport. All plans will be prepared in a format which complies with the content contained within FAA’s current guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout plan as defined by the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (October 1, 2013), and which is readily acceptable to the FAA and can be utilized by the County staff in carrying out implementation. All plans will be produced utilizing AutoCAD software. The AutoCAD drawings, in a version acceptable to the Sponsor, will be a deliverable item to the County at the completion of this project. The Airport Plans will be included as an appendix in the Narrative Report document. A narrative will also be included in the appendix to better describe the intended functions of the proposed development items. Task 2.1 – Airport Layout Drawing and Data Sheet Description: Following the Recommended Airport Master Plan Concept developed under the preceding element, and FAA AC 150/5070.6A, "Airport Master Plan", an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for the airport will be prepared utilizing AutoCAD Software. The ALP will reflect updated physical features, location of
airfield facilities (runways, taxiways, navaids), and existing landside development. Development of recommended landside and airfield facilities, including runways and taxiways; property and runway protection zone boundaries; and revenue support areas will also be shown. Guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout plan as defined by the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (October 1, 2013) will be followed. Task 2.2 – Terminal Area Drawings Description: Update the Terminal Area Drawings reflecting recommended development on the landside development areas as resulting from the recommendations of this study. Task 2.3 - Part 77 Airspace Drawing(s) Description: Update the existing and ultimate Airport Airspace Drawing(s) in conformance with 14 CFR Part 77. The set will include an identification of obstructions and an obstruction data table. Obstruction information will be obtained from existing approach plans, obstruction surveys, new aerial surveys, and the current Airport Obstruction (OC) chart (as available). U.S.G.S. base maps will be superimposed on the airspace drawing. A plan for the disposition of the obstructions, as identified, will also be included as part of the obstruction data table. Task 2.4 - Inner Approach Surface Drawing(s) Description: Update the existing inner portion of the approach surface drawing in accordance with Appendix F of FAA AC 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans. Obstruction information will be obtained from existing approach plans, obstruction surveys, new aerial surveys, and the current Airport Obstruction (OC) chart (as available). Task 2.5 – On-Airport Land Use Drawing Description: A land use plan for the area within the boundaries of the airport will be prepared, based on the identified overall development concept. This will include airfield development areas, general aviation areas, ground access and vehicular circulation system service areas, and distinctions between aeronautical and non-aeronautical uses. Task 2.6 – Departure Surface Drawings Description: Prepare new departure surface drawings in accordance with FAA AC 150/5070- 6B, Airport Master Plans. Obstruction information will be obtained from existing approach plans, obstruction surveys, new aerial surveys, and the current Airport Obstruction (OC) chart (as available). Task 2.7 – Airport Property Map – Exhibit A Description: Update the Exhibit A - Airport Property Map, including the appropriate graphics and information to indicate the type of acquisition (i.e., federal funds, surplus property, local funds only, etc.) of various land areas within the airport's boundaries. The primary intent of the drawing is to identify and/or delineate all designated airport property owned or to be acquired by the airport owner. The drawing will provide an inventory all of the parcels which currently make up the airport, or are proposed for acquisition by the airport. The drawing will inventory all of the parcels, which currently make up the airport, or are proposed for acquisition by the airport sponsor. Details will be limited to the depiction of existing and future facilities (i.e., runways, taxiways, runway protection zones, and terminal facilities) which would indicate aeronautical need for airport property. This work effort will utilize information obtained from the current "Exhibit A - Property Map" as well as other sources. The Property Map will be updated in conformance with the guidelines outlined in FAA Airports ARP SOP 3.00 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for FAA Review of Exhibit ‘A’ Airport Property Inventory Maps (October 1, 2013). The Consultant will verify all
existing airport property and easements, as well as boundary surveys, and the County will provide assistance if needed. Task 2.8 - Preparation of Draft ALP Drawing Set Description: Preparation of up to twelve (12) copies of the full drawing sets for submission to the County, and subsequent comprehensive agency review by FAA and CALTRANS. Drawings will be a minimum size of 24” x 36”. The County will provide up to ten (10) unsigned copies of the full ALP drawing set for review. The County will also provide one (1) full set of drawings to CALTRANS for review. Task 2.9 - Preparation of Final ALP Drawing Set Description: Revise the Draft Airport Layout Plan Drawings prepared in Task 2.8 to reflect comments received from the SFO-ADO and CALTRANS review. Upon approval from the County, provide up to eight (8) copies of the revised ALP Drawing Set to the County for their signature. The County will forward the signed drawings to the SFO-ADO for final approval. Assumptions: It is assumed that all previously prepared ALP Drawings and associated data, including Computer Added Design/Drafting (CADD) files, will be provided to the Consultant by the County. It is also assumed that the Project will NOT include the following:
Development and evaluation of range of alternatives for airport development. Preparation of environmental documentation to meet California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements.
ALP UPDATE AND NARRATIVE REPORT AMADOR COUNTY AIRPORT
ADMIN GRANT STAFF ASST ADM PLAN PLAN
TASK
MAN PLAN
PROJ ENG
DEPT MAN
DIRECT COSTS
SERVICES BY OTHERS
TOTALS
PHASE I - ADMINISTRATIVE Project Management Grant applications and reimbursements Meetings/coordination
4 4
56
12
6
16
16
12
4
20 20 2
32 8 40
2 4
16
2 4 2 4 8 8
16 4
PHASE II - AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NARRATIVE REPORT) Airport Inventory Environmental Features Evaluation Airport Obstruction Evaluation Airport Pavement Evaluation and Analysis (PCN Calculations) Key Issues Facility Requirements Financial Plan Draft/Final ALP Narrative Report
8
16
4 44 8 20
2
16 4
100 24
16
16 4
2 2
10
PHASE III - UPDATE TO ALP DRAWING SET Draft ALP Drawing Set Final ALP Drawing Set
4
2
DIRECT EXPENSES Travel Expenses
$
238
$
SERVICE BY OTHERS AGIS/Obstruction Survey - Towill 18
16
110
352
58
Amador Co. Airport ALP Update Fee Estimate 101717.xlsm
54
16
$238
$75,053.00 $75,053
$19,412 $9,868 $2,136 $7,408 $35,720 $8,104 $3,472 $4,526 $2,920 $1,926 $7,006 $2,740 $5,026 $19,566 $14,946 $4,620 $238 238 $75,053 $75,053 $149,989
TOTAL HOURS PER TASK
74 20 56 70 32 42 18 12 64 20 48 130 38
474
PLANNING SERVICES COST SCHEDULE "B"
PROJECT NAME:
ALP Update and Narrative Report
DATE:
October 17, 2017
PROJ DESCRIPTION:
The Consultant shall provide planning services, to include ALP Update and Narrative Report, Obstruction Survey and PCN Pavement Calculations
A/E:
C & S ENGINEERS, INC.
PROJECT NO:
TBD
County of Amador
C&S CONTACT:
Jessica Bryan
CLIENT: CLIENT MANAGER: I. DIRECT SALARY COSTS:
RATE OF PAY TITLE
($/HR)
@
HOURS
COST
A.
DEPARTMENT MANAGER
$260.00
X
16
=
$4,160
B.
PROJECT ENGINEER
$150.00
X
54
=
$8,100
C.
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
$78.00
X
18
=
$1,404
D.
GRANTS ADMINISTRATOR
$114.00
X
16
=
$1,824
E.
MANAGING PLANNER
$186.00
X
58
=
$10,788
F.
PLANNER
$108.50
X
352
=
$38,192
G.
STAFF PLANNER
$93.00
X
110
=
$10,230
TOTAL PLANNING SERVICES:
$74,698
II. ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES: A.
TRAVEL, RENTAL CAR:
B.
TRAVEL, BY AIR:
C.
TRAVEL, PER DIEM:
D.
TRAVEL, MILEAGE:
E.
TRAVEL, HOTEL:
F.
MISCELLANEOUS:
0
DAYS @
2 RENTAL RATE @
0
TRIPS @
2
2
DAYS @
1
2 ROUND TRIPS @ 0
TRIPS @
$100.000
=
$0.00
PERSONS @
$500.00
=
$0.00
PERSONS @
$50.00
=
$100.00
MILES/RATE @
$0.550
=
$137.50
2 ROOM RATE @
$135.000
=
$0.00
=
$0.00
125
TOTAL ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES:
$238
III. SUBCONSULTANTS A.
AGIS/OBSTRUCTION SURVEY - TOWILL
$
75,053
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS:
IV. TOTALS:
TOTAL PLANNING SERVICES AND FAA ELIGIBLE
B-1
$
75,053
$149,989
AGIS AND AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN FOR AMADOR COUNTY AIRPORT
OBJECTIVE Towill understands that C&S is requesting survey data to support updating the currently approved Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Package, and provide a narrative report (Narrative Report) supporting the proposed changes and/or revisions to the ALP at Amador County airport runway 1/19. Towill will work closely with C&C, the Airport authority, and the FAA to provide and upload applicable AGIS data in general conformance with FAA standards as defined in FAA AC 150/5300‐16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys: Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey, FAA AC 150/5300‐17C, Standards for Using Remote Sensing Technologies in Airport Surveys, and FAA AC 150/5300‐18B, General Guidance and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards. This survey will be completed for an Airport Layout Plan indicated in FAA circular AC 150/5300‐18B Table 2‐1
Towill will provide all required deliverables identified in FAA circular AC 150/5300‐18B Table 2‐1
C&S will provide overall contract management and primary coordination as it relates to master planning inputs needed to satisfy the deliverables
C&S will provide outside agency coordination, and ALP drawing set updates
Towill will provide ground survey activities, orthophotography, base planimetric mapping and feature classifications, digital terrain modeling, and airspace obstruction data related to the AGIS vertically guided airspace surfaces (150/5300‐18B), part77 type C runway, and Runway End Siting Surface (RESS) type 4.
COMPENSATION The Method of Payment to CONSULTANT shall be on a total fixed cost of $75,053 to be invoiced monthly based on the percentage completed.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS & COORDINATION Towill team anticipates that additional site safety and coordination training may take place prior to the start of field activities. The field crew will use clearly identified company vehicles equipped with two‐way radios. Both teams will require coordination with the airport authority for project status reports, obtaining requested data, security badging and escorting ground survey crews, the review and approval of the draft and final submittals of work products, and coordination with outside agencies including FAA, as described in subsequent sections of this document.
DELIVERABLES The C& S Team will be responsible for the generation of the updated ALP drawing set. Towill will deliver all supporting products in the proper formats including stereo imagery, orthophotography, base planimetric and topographic mapping, and airspace obstruction identification data. Table 1 provides a breakdown of the required deliverables defined in the Advisory Circulars and the scope of this project.
DELIVERABLE
TRIGGER
TEAM
DESCRIPTION
Statement of Work
Work to be performed
C&S Engineers, Inc.
Plans. Deliver to FAA GIS via portal
Survey Quality Plan
Official Notice to Proceed
Towill, Inc.
Plans. Defines survey operations and quality control practices. Delivered to FAA via GIS portal
Image Acquisition Plan
Official Notice to Proceed
Towill, Inc.
Plans. Defines technical approach for stereo‐aerial photography acquisition. Delivered to FAA via GIS portal
Aerial Photography
Aerial Triangulation Completion
Towill, Inc.
Post flight. NGS delivery on external disk(s): Digital stereo imagery, imagery control points, Geo‐referencing, flight report
Airport obstructions and mapping digital files
Field survey and photogrammetric tasks completion
Towill, Inc.
Post obstructions. Delivery to C&S Engineers. Obstructions in XYZ and shapefile formats, planimetric details in AutoCAD format, final survey report
Final survey report
Approved Towill’s digital data contents
C&S Engineers, Inc.
Delivered to FAA and airport authority. Complete digital dataset
Airport Layout Plan sheets
Approved final survey report
C&S Engineers, Inc.
Delivered to FAA and airport authority. All required ALP sheets.
TABLE 1 – DELIVERABLES & TRIGGERS
AIRSPACE SURVEY SURFACE SPECIFICATIONS Table 2 defines all surfaces identified by C&S Engineers to be included in the Airspace Survey Analysis for runway 13/31. These surfaces include: 1) All seven (7) Vertically Guided Runway Surfaces, 2) Part 77 type C non‐precision instrument runway surfaces. Image 1 shows the coverage area of all combined surfaces. TYPE
SURFACE
TEAM
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Runway Primary Surface (VGRPS)
1000 foot wide rectangular surface longitudinally centered on runway centerline.
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Primary Connection between the VGRPS and the Connection Surface(VGPCS) VGATS
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guide Protection Surface (VGPS)
A trapezoidal sloping surface beginning at the threshold and extending outward 6,000 feet
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Approach Surface (VGAS)
Surface extending 20,000 feet from end of VGPRS
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Approach
Surface aligned with VGPCS and sloping
TYPE
SURFACE Transitional Surface (VGATS)
TEAM upward towards VGHS
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Horizontal Horizontal plane 150 feet above airport Surface (VGHS) elevation for a distance of 10,000 feet
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Conical Surface (VGCS)
Sloping surface extending upward and outward from VGHS for a horizontal distance of 7,000 feet
Part 77
Primary Surface
500 foot wide Surface longitudinally centered on runway centerline and extending 200 feet beyond runway end
Part 77
Transitional Surface
Surface sloping from the sides of the primary and approach surfaces
Part 77
Approach Surface
Surface extending 10,000 feet from edge of primary surface
Part 77
Horizontal Surface
Horizontal plane 150 feet above airport elevation for a distance of 10,000 feet
RESS – Type 4
Field Data Collection and Inventory
Surface starts 200 feet from runway end and extends horizontally 10,000 feet at a slope of 20:1. 400 feet wide at start and 3,800 feet wide at end
TABLE 2 – AIRSPACE SURVEY SURFACES
DATUM REFERENCE All surveys and final data will be based on the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83(2011)). All elevations are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Geoidal heights are based on NGS Geoid12A model. Grid coordinates will be reported in State Plane California Zone 2 (0402). All units are in US Survey Foot. SUMMARY OF SURVEY ACTIVITIES
Geodetic Control: Necessary geodetic control stations will be defined on the airport to be used for the duration of the project. The control will be tied to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)
Aerial Photography Acquisition: Aerial Imagery is required by NGS specifications and internally to Towill for the purpose of Quality Control (QC), stereo data collection, and efficient and accurate obstruction analysis. The photogrammetry team will develop a flightplan, and coordinate the acquisition, process, data collection, and analysis.
Obstruction Analysis: Obstruction collection and analysis will be completed for the specified surfaces as defined by the FAA circulars and in table 2. This task will utilize multiple types of surveys and techniques for the observations, recording, and analysis of runway, NAVAID, control, and obstructions
Base mapping Feature Data Extraction: The accepted aerial imagery will be used by the photogrammetry team to extract base mapping features necessary to complete the ALP. A complete list of these features are found in table 4.
Digital Ortho‐Photography: Towill team with generate digital ortho‐photography at a Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) of 1‐foot, and tiled to optimize efficiency in terms of file size and coverage.
TASKS & RESPONSIBITIES The Towill Team proposes to complete this work in the following five tasks in table 3: TASK
TEAM
1. AGIS Project Setup and Management
C&S Engineers, Inc. & Towill, Inc.
2. Imagery and NGS Data Submittal
Towill, Inc.
3. Field Data Collection and Inventory
Towill, Inc.
4. Base map Feature Extraction & Ortho‐ photography
Towill, Inc.
5. Obstruction Extraction and Airspace Analysis
Towill, Inc.
6. ALP Update Drawings
C&S Engineers, Inc.
TABLE 3 – TASKS AND RESPONSIBITIES
IMAGE 1 – AMADOR COUNTY AIRPORT SURFACE COVERAGE AND FLIGHTPLAN
TASK 1: AGIS PROJECT SETUP AND MANAGEMENT
1.1 OBJECTIVES The objectives of task 1 is project setup and project management, Quality Control, project coordination and progress reporting. To accomplish this task, the Towill team will assist C&S Engineers by providing the preliminary reports to be submitted to the AGIS.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK The C&S team will develop the AGIS Statement of Work (SOW) specifically focused on the FAA scope and upload it to the AGIS website for review and approval, as is required by FAA AC 150/5300‐18B. After the FAA approves C&S SOW, the Towill Team will prepare and submit to C&S two associated work plans. C&S will in turn submit these plans to AGIS for review and approval for completing the data collection, analysis, and final data deliverables to AGIS. These plans are:
Survey and Quality Control Plan (FAA AC 150/5300‐18B)
Imagery Acquisition Plan (FAA AC 150/5300‐17C)
TASK 2: IMAGERY AND NGS DATA SUBMITTAL
2.1 OBJECTIVES The objectives of Task 2 are to process the aerial imagery acquired for use in preparing orthophotography, topographic and base planimetric mapping, and airspace obstruction analyses. The processed imagery, the ground control points, the final Aerial Triangulation results, and related reports will be submitted to NGS as per FAA AC 150/5300‐17C 2.2 SCOPE OF WORK The Towill Team will submit the imagery files and reports defined in AC 150/5300‐16A, 17B, and 18B to AGIS. An aerial photogrammetric (AP) acquisition report will be sent along with the stereo imagery to the NGS for use in imagery and obstruction verification. In coordination with C&S, the Towill Team will monitor the FAA’s review and obtain an acceptable imagery usability report. In the event the FAA determines the imagery unacceptable, the Towill Team will work with C&S and the FAA to determine the items, including the possibility of collecting new imagery, required to reach a favorable determination. The Towill Team will perform quality control on the data as it is being prepared. An internal quality assurance step will ensure that all of the data agreed upon to be provided between the C&S, the airport, and FAA described under this scope of work is compliant with FAA standards. Having incorporated revisions from the C&S of the Final data and having passed the final Quality Assurance step, the Towill Team will package and send to NGS the required deliverables including stereo imagery, Aerial Triangulation solution and reports, ground control listings and reports, and a final imagery reports as described in the approved Imagery Acquisition Plan. The deliverables will include: • • • • •
Stereo imagery on DVD sent to NGS and FAA (imagery acquired from Service Directive 6 Obtain acceptable imagery usability report from NGS Aerial Photogrammetric (AP) acquisition report (AP report uploaded to AGIS website Draft and Final AGIS data Final completion report (FAA AC 150/5300‐18B)
TASK 3: FIELD DATA COLLECTION AND INVENTORY
3.1 OBJECTIVES The objective of Task 3 is to collect ground survey information for runway critical points and NAVAIDs for the AGIS data set in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300‐18B. 3.2 SCOPE OF WORK Prior to and throughout the survey project, the Towill team will communicate with appropriate Airport officials regarding established safety, communication, airside restrictions and future airfield construction activity considerations. It is understood by the Towill team that coordination with and observation by the airport is accepted at any time. The Towill team will conduct site safety training and coordination training prior to the start of field activities and will plan on having escorts as may be required for all survey activities directly adjacent to or within the Airport Movement Area. Survey staff shall be properly badged and trained and vehicles shall be properly marked meeting the Port’s requirements. 3.2.1
GEODETIC CONTROL AND PHOTO CONTROL SURVEY
As part of the initial research for Primary and/or Secondary Airport Control Stations (PACS/SACS), Towill team will review the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) database for evidence of existing geodetic control on the airfields. If not found, Towill will create Temporary Survey Marks (TSM) in accordance with AC‐16A to provide a temporary tie to the NSRS. The Towill team will utilize established geodetic control and photo control information as required. The Towill team will densify the survey control as necessary to complete this task. 3.2.2
RUNWAY SURVEYS
The Towill team will collect runway centerline profiles in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300‐18B on each of runway 1/19 pavements utilizing GPS techniques. The profiles will be collected to deliver profile lines on the centerline at a spacing of 50‐feet between data points and 50‐foot offset profiles either side of centerline. 3.2.3
RUNWAY CRITICAL POINTS
The Towil Team will collect all runway critical points identified in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B, Table 2‐1 (for ALP), to the accuracies identified in Chapter 5 of the AC. If an existing runway endpoint monument does not already exist at each runway end a survey nail and washer shall be set. The Towill Team will determine the runway lengths from the positions of the runway endpoints and notify the Airport authorities and C&S if the lengths differ from those previously published. 3.2.4
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS (NAVAIDS)
The Towill Team will verify electronic and visual NAVAIDs associated with the Airport that is required in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B. The Towill Team will utilize airport staff for assistance in identifying specific information about the NAVAID systems prior to survey. Coordination with Airport Operations, FAA Air Traffic Control and FAA engineers will be conducted as needed to ensure the NAVAID survey does not impact NAVAID signals or flight safety. 3.3 DELIVERABLES Deliverables to include: Survey data for runway critical points and NAVAIDs as required in FAA AC 150/5300‐ 18B to support the AGIS and ALP data set
TASK 4: BASE MAP FEATURE EXTRACTION & ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY
4.1 OBJECTIVES The Towill photogrammetric team will develop base mapping planimetric feature data per the requirements in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B as follows:
Within the Airport Property Boundary, collect all existing features set forth in FAA AC 150/5300‐ 18B Chapter 5, but will be limited to only those feature shown in table 5 .that are present within the will be captured from the aerial imagery.
Collect additional limited landmark features outside the Airport Property.
Collect breaklines and masspoints within the Airport Property Boundary for the development of a DEM of sufficient accuracy and density to meet the national map accuracy standards for one‐foot contour.
Produce digital orthopohotography at one‐foot GSD to the full extent of the outer limit of the vertically guided conical surface
4.2 BASE MAPPING PLANIMETRIC & TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION Base mapping features collected correspond with the final intended output map scale and the ability of the operator to see and interpret features in the photography. Following compilation, an internal QA/QC test will be performed. As each model is completed, it will be edge‐matched to adjacent models. When all models are complete in the project, the entire set will be cartographically edited to assure compliance with all standards. Planimetric QA/QC will involve both hardcopy and softcopy reviews. Within the Airport Property Boundary, the Towill photogrammetry team will also supplement feature collection with 3D mass points and break lines in order to generate a 3D digital terrain model (DTM). Mass points and break lines will be collected in a manner and accuracy that will attain a horizontal and vertical accuracy to meet the national map accuracy standards for one‐foot contour generation. 4.3 ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY GENERATION The Towill ortho team will provide a copy of color digital ortho‐rectified imagery: 0.25 ft./pixel resolution for the Airport property (Exhibit 1) and 1.0 ft./pixel resolution for the area under the Airspace Boundary (image 1). Orthophotography will be delivered according to the State Plane grid and provided in both TIFF (.tif) and MrSID (.sid) file formats. The Towill ortho team will ortho‐rectify the digital imagery utilizing the results of the analytical aerial triangulation camera station parameters, the digital raw imagery, and the collected ground DEM.
The generated orthoimages will be visually checked for accuracy and fidelity on the workstation screen. Selected check points that are visible on the image will be visited on the screen, and the X and Y coordinates of the location of the check point will be displayed. This information will be cross referenced with the X and Y information provided by the GPS survey.
The orthorectified images will be mosaiced by the Towill ortho team, using INPHO’s OrthoVista software, with a focus on ensuring consistent rendering and seam line generation. Mosaic seamlines will then be edited by orthophoto technicians using INPHO’s OrthoVista Seamline Editor to ensure that seams will not cross through buildings, bridges, or any other structure not at ground level. Seamlines may follow features such as roads, tree lines, edges of water bodies, or edges of cleared utility rights‐of‐ way, so as to minimize the obtrusiveness of the seam and to reduce differences in tone and contrast between different images. The orthorectified images will be mosaiced so as to maximize single image tile coverage. Radiometric processing by the Towill ortho team uses INPHO’s OrthoVista Radiometrix Editor and automatic color matching and balancing for adjustment of individual images, and Adobe Photoshop for final
global adjustment finishing. Each image is reviewed against surrounding frames for radiometric consistency and image flaws, reflections, and related features that need special attention. During this process, the Towill ortho team will pay special attention to preservation of detail in shadows and highlights, and avoiding washouts.
TASK 5: OBSTRUCTION EXTRACTION AND AIRSPACE ANALYSIS
12.2 OBJECTIVES The Towill Team will utilize the triangulated stereo models generated from the acquired imagery to determine features that penetrate the RESS, Part 77, and Vertically Guided obstruction identification surfaces (identified in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B). The Towill Team will utilize a variety of survey techniques including customized inhouse tools for acquisition of features that are suspected of potentially penetrating the airspace surfaces. Direct measurement, triangulation, or ground survey may be used. The Towill Team will tie field measurements to the geodetic control established for the survey. The obstruction data points related to the vertically guided airspace surfaces (150/5300‐18B) will be processed with the RESS and Part 77 surfaces. Obstacle penetrating the vertically guided obstruction identification surfaces will be documented as part of the AGIS feature and attribute data set for submission to the FAA. Obstacle penetrating the Part 77 and the RESS surfaces will be delivered in ASCII XYZ format as well as in ESRI shapefile format.
TASK 6: ALP UPDATE DRAWINGS
6.1 OBJECTIVES The Towill Team will assist C&S Engineers by providing all planimetrics and obstructions information necessary for the ALP update. All other ALP update processes including the generation of the final sheets will be carried out by the C&S team.
TABLE 4 BASE MAPPING FEATURE LIST DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
Airfield
AircraftGateStandPoint
Point
Airfield
AircraftNonMovementArea
Line
Airfield
AirfieldLight
Point
Airfield
AirOperationsArea
Polygon
Airfield
AirportSign
Point
Airfield
Apron
Polygon
Airfield
DeicingArea
Polygon
Airfield
PassengerLoadingBridge
Polygon
Airfield
RestrictedAccessBoundary
Line
Airfield
Runway
Polygon
Airfield
Runway
String (40)
Airfield
Runway
Airfield
Runway
String (255) Enumeration (20)
Airfield
Runway
String (7)
Airfield
Runway
Real
Airfield
Runway
Airfield
Runway
Enumeration (16) Enumeration (16)
DEFINITION Geographic position of painted stand positions on the stand guidance line usually marked by a yellow crossbar according to aircraft type (e.g., for B‐747, A‐340) Taxiways and apron (ramp) areas not under the control of air traffic. Any lighting located within or near an airport boundary the provides guidance for airborne and ground maneuvering of aircraft. Air Operations Area is where security measures are enforced as specified in the airport security program. This area includes aircraft movement areas, aircraft parking areas, loading ramps, and safety areas and any adjacent areas (such as general aviation areas) not separated by adequate security systems, measures, or procedures. Signs at an airport other than surface painted signs. A defined area on an airport or heliport, paved or unpaved, intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading passengers or cargo, refueling, parking, or maintenance. An aircraft deicing facility is a facility where: (1) frost, ice, or snow is removed (deicing) from the aircraft in order to provide clean surfaces and/or (2) clean surfaces of the aircraft receive protection (anti‐icing) against the formation of frost or ice and accumulation of snow or slush for a limited period of time. A bridge for loading/unloading access to airplanes for passengers and crew. A restricted area boundary identifies areas strictly reserved for use by authorized personnel only. A rectangular area on a airport prepared for the landing and takeoff run of aircraft Designator of the runway based on the magnetic bearing and position in relation to parallel runways (e.g. 33R/15L) Description of the feature. A temporal description of the operational status of the feature. Designator of the runway based on the magnetic bearing and position in relation to parallel runways (for example, 33R/15L). Perpendicular line to the surface centerline, extending to the edge of the runway pavement on both sides of the runway, through a runway end‐ point. If less than 100 feet round up to the nearest 5 feet. If more than 100 feet round to the nearest 10 feet. A classification of airfield pavement surfaces for Airport Obstruction Charts A code indicating the composition of the related surface
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Polygon
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
String (50) String (255) Enumeration (20) Real Enumeration (16) Enumeration (16) String (3)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
Line
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
String (7)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
String (7)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
String (255) Enumeration (20)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
Boolean (1)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Point
Airfield
RunwayEnd
String (40)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
String (255)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Integer
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Airfield
RunwayEnd
String (3)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Enumeration (20) Enumeration (16)
DEFINITION A specially prepared surface placed adjacent to the ends of runways to eliminate the erosive effect of the high wind forces produced by airplanes at the beginning of their takeoff rolls. The name of the feature. Textual description of the featurE The overall length of the feature A code indicating the composition of the related surface A code indicating the composition of the related surface Specific runway end designator. Continuous line along the painted centerline of a runway connecting the middle‐points of the two outermost thresholds. Centerline is composed of many centerline points (see RunwayControlPoint). It is used to calculate grade and line‐of‐ sight criteria. Designator of the runway based on the magnetic bearing and position in relation to parallel runways (e.g. 33R/15L) The designator of the associated runway Textual description of the feature. A temporal description of the operational status of the feature. Indicates whether the centerline is derived or photodetermined The end of the runway surface suitable for landing or takeoff runs of aircraft. Runway Ends describe the approach and departure procedure characteristics of a runway threshold. The Runway End is the same as the runway threshold when the threshold is not displaced. The name of the feature. Description of the feature. The height above the reference ellipsoid, measured along the ellipsoidal outer normal through the point in question. Also called the geodetic height. The predominant status of the airfield facility surface site. Code indicating the type of precision guidance applicable. The distance from the runway end to the landing threshold. When the thresholdType is normal, displacedDist = 0 LDA: The runway length declared available and suitable for a landing airplane The designator for the runway end (i.e. 32L) TODA: The TORA plus the length of any remaining runway clearway beyond the far end of the TORA TORA: The runway length declared available and suitable for the ground run of an airplane taking off
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Airfield
RunwayIntersection
TYPE Enumeration (16) Polygon
Airfield
RunwayLabelReferencePoi nt
Airfield
RunwaySafetyAreaBoundar
Polygon
Airfield
Shoulder
Polygon
Airfield
TaxiwayElement
Polygon
Airfield
TaxiwayHoldingPosition
Line
Airfield
TaxiwayIntersection
Polygon
Airspace
LandmarkSegment
Line
Airspace
LandmarkSegment
String (40)
Airspace
Obstacle
Point
Airspace
Obstacle
String (50)
Airspace
Obstacle
Airspace
Obstacle
Boolean (1) Enumeration (16)
Airspace
Obstacle
Real
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Polygon
Airspace
ObstructionArea
String (40)
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Boolean (1) Enumeration (16) Real
DEFINITION An description of the landing threshold: either normal or displaced The area in which two or more runways intersect The bottom center position of the runway designation marking. The boundary of the Runway Safety Area (RSA). An area adjacent to the edge of paved runways, taxiways, or Defined paths on an airport established for the taxiing of aircraft (excluding apron taxilanes) and intended to provide a link between one part of the airport and another. A designated position at which taxiing aircraft and vehicles shall stop and hold position, unless otherwise authorized by the aerodrome control tower. A junction of two or more taxiways (Source: ICAO Annex 14, Volume 1, Aerodromes, Chapter 1, page 5). Features providing geographic orientation near the airport vicinity. The features may or may not have obstruction value. Collect geographic features of landmark value aiding in geographic orientation as individual polyline objects. The name of the feature All fixed (whether temporary or permanent) and mobile objects, or parts thereof, that are located on an area intended for the surface movement of aircraft, penetrating an Obstruction Identification Surface (OIS), or selected as representative object. Use this feature for modeling linear objects as obstacles. The name of the feature. A code indicating that the obstacle is lighted The type of markings applied to the feature. The height above the reference ellipsoid, measured along the ellipsoidal outer normal through the point in question. Also called the geodetic height. Polygon features penetrating the plane of the obstruction identification surface (OIS) or selected as representative objects. Determine the type of obstructing area by the predominant feature within the grouped area. Penetrating groups of trees, ground, buildings, urban areas, mobile cranes, and agricultural area are the most common types of obstruction areas found within the surfaces of an Airport Airspace Analysis survey. The name of the feature A code indicating that the obstacle is lighted The type of markings applied to the feature. The overall length of the obstruction.
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
DEFINITION
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Real
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Real
The overall width of the obstruction. The height above the reference ellipsoid, measured along the ellipsoidal outer normal through the point in question.
Airspace Airspace Airspace Airspace
ObstructionIdentificationSu rface ObstructionIdentificationSu rface ObstructionIdentificationSu rface ObstructionIdentificationSu rface
String (30)
A commonly used name for the zone.
String (255)
Description of the feature
Enumeration (20) Enumeration (16)
A temporal description of the operational status of the feature Defines the type of approach guidances the OIS is meant to protect. The value of the maximum profile slope of the obstruction identification surface. This value is always expressed as a percent. A derived imaginary Obstruction Identification Surface defined by the FAA. A polygon, or a set of polygons, that encompasses all property owned or controlled by the airport for aviation purposes. The boundary where land meets the edge of a large body of fresh or salt water. A control station established in the vicinity of, and usually on, an airport and tied to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS). Permanent point identifier assigned by NGS to PACS and SACS
Airspace
ObstructionIdentificationSu rface
Real
Airspace
ObstructionIdentSurface
Polygon
Cadastral
AirportBoundary
Polygon
Environmental
Shoreline
Polygon
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Point
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (6)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Enumeration (20)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Contains the allowable values of a point type used by the ControlPoint feature. The point types may be supplementally provided as subtypes of ControlPoints for ease of use and clarification.
String (50) Enumeration (20) String (255)
Any commonly used name for the control point. The type of monument as defined by the Corps of Engineers EM 1110‐1‐1002. A temporal description of the operational status of the feature. Specific runway end designator. Specific runway designator.
The monument description.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Enumeration (20)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (3)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (7
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Date
The year of the most recent runway end survey used to compute the ARP
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Date
The date the monument was last field recovered. Format for date is YYYYMMDD (i.e., September 15, 1994 = 19940915).
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (30)
The condition and type of the marker (witness post) used to identify the location of the monument.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (255)
The field book.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Boolean (1)
A Boolean indicating GPS suitability.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (40)
The designation stamped into the bottom of the monument.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (10)
Survey epoch used to establish the control point.
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
Geodetic
ElevationContour
Line
Geodetic
ImageArea
Polygon
Navigational Aids
NavigationalAidEquipment
Navigational Aids
NavigationalAidEquipment
Structures
Building
Polygon
Structures
Fence
Line
Structures
Gate
Line
Structures
Roof
Polygon
Structures
Tower
Point
Surface Transportation
Bridge
Polygon
DrivewayArea
Polygon
RailroadCenterline
Line
Surface Transportation Surface Transportation
Surface Transportation
RoadSegment
Polygon
Surface Transportation
Sidewalk
Polygon
DEFINITION Connecting points on the surface of the earth of equal vertical elevation representing some fixed elevation interval. The image foot print or coverage area. Any ground‐based visual or electronic device that provides point to point guidance information or position to aircraft in flight. The name of the feature. A three‐dimensional structure (i.e. hangars, terminals, etc.) modeled with a bounding polygon. Any fencing (chain‐link, razor wire, PVC, etc.). A gate is an opening in a fence or other type of barrier between areas. Structure on top of buildings, garages and other similar structures. A structure created, by man, to facilitate an activity at an elevated level above the ground. A structure used by vehicles that allows passage over or under an obstacle such as a river, chasm, mountain, road or railroad. An access to a residence or other vehicle parking lot or storage area. Represents the centerline of each pair of rails Represents a linear section of the physical road system designed for, or the result of, human or vehicular movement; must be continuous (no gaps) and cannot branch; no mandates are provided on how to segment the road system except that data providers adopt a consistent method. A paved or concrete pad used as a pedestrian walkway. Usually is composed of one or more SideWalkSegments
Operations Manager
task
Airport Solution Specialist
Admin Support
14
2
Field Survey Manager
Field Survey Technician
Photo Services Supervisor
Photo Services Technician
Photogrammetri Photogrammetri c Manager c Technician
Graphics Manager
Graphics Technician
Totals
Hourly Rate 1 AGIS Project Setup and Management
4
20
2 Imagery and AGIS Data Submittal Acquisition to Sub
$9,995.00
Processing
2
2
6
60
24
220
4
4
3 Field Data Collection and Inventory
2
4
4. Base map Feature Extraction & Orthophotography
2
4
5. Obstruction Extraction and Airspace Analysis
2
4
12
26
6
30
280
0
4
Airport Solution Specialist
Admin Support
Field Survey Manager
Field Survey Technician
Photo Services Supervisor
Photo Services Technician
$195
$152
$77
$152
$118
$118
$91
$152
$780
$2,128
$154
$0
$0
$0
$0
$390
$0
$154
$912
$7,080
$0
$390
$608
$0
$3,648
$25,960
$390
$608
$154
$0
$390
$608
$0
$2,340
$3,952
$462
2
50
128 2
16
268
4
60
2
30
104
4
40
2
8
60
12
150
6
54
580 + Flight
Graphics Manager
Graphics Technician
$91
$118
$77
$0
$0
$0
$0
3,062.00
$364
$608
$4,550
$0
$0
14,058.00
$0
$0
$0
$0
$236
$1,232
32,074.00
$0
$0
$0
$608
$5,460
$236
$2,310
9,766.00
$0
$0
$0
$0
$608
$3,640
$236
$616
6,098.00
$4,560
$33,040
$0
$364
$1,824
$13,650
$708
$4,158
75,053.00
6. ALP Update Drawings
0
Operations Manager
task Hourly Rate 1 AGIS Project Setup and Management
Photogrammetri Photogrammetri c Manager c Technician
Totals
2 Imagery and AGIS Data Submittal Acquisition to Sub Processing 3 Field Data Collection and Inventory 4. Base map Feature Extraction & Orthophotography 5. Obstruction Extraction and Airspace Analysis
$9,995.00
9,995.00
6. ALP Update Drawings
0.00
Scope of Work INTRODUCTION The objective of this effort is to update the Amador County Airport (JAQ), Airport Layout Plan (ALP) drawing set (ALP) and provide a narrative report (Narrative Report) supporting the proposed changes and/or revisions to the ALP. The narrative report will focus on the facility changes and development direction of the airport that has occurred since the preparation of the previous Airport Layout Plan. The ALP Narrative Report will include the identification of future facility needs, and capital improvement scheduling and costs. The ALP Narrative Report and the updated ALP drawing set will also reflect new policies and development direction provided by Amador County. The Consultant will prepare the Narrative Report, including the ALP update, in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements, including Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans (as amended), AC 150/5300-13A, Airport Design (as amended), and guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout plan as defined by the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (October 1, 2013). Task 1.1 Inventory Physical Facilities Description: Perform complete inventory of physical facilities and land uses which presently exist within the boundaries of the airport. The inventory will include an examination of plans and documents as well as a thorough on-site inspection of each physical facility to determine its type, size, and use with specific emphasis on facilities that have changed since the preparation of the previous ALP. The work effort will make maximum use of existing information available in the Airport and Amador County offices. The following relevant areas are included as a minimum:
List of Fixed Based Operators (FBOs) and services provided Supplementary facilities (other businesses on airport)
Task 1.2 Evaluate Existing Documents Description: Evaluate in detail existing documents and previous planning efforts for their adaptability or use in developing the Narrative Report. These documents will include previous airport studies, area development plans, local and regional aviation forecasts and planning, comprehensive land use plans, and such other documentation as available. Consultant shall obtain and review previous construction as-built drawings, obstruction surveys, and other available plans, drawings, specifications, etc. applicable to the airport, etc. Note: Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP is currently being updated by Amador County). Task 1.3 Obtain New Aerial Photograph and Mapping/Aeronautical Survey Description: The Consultant will assemble new digital electronic color aerial photography and new topographic/planimetric and obstruction mapping of the Airport and its environs in accordance with FAA Advisory Circulars 150/5300-16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys: Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; 150/530017A,General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and
Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; and 150/5300- 18B, General Guidance And Specifications For Submission Of Aeronautical Surveys To NGS: Field Data Collection And Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards. Topographic and planimetric mapping of the surrounding area and aerial photography of the airport including existing and potential future airport property, as well as the inner approach surface areas, will be obtained by the Consultant. The digital color aerial photography will be used for base mapping and exhibits. The horizontal datum will be NAD83 and the vertical datum will be NAVD88. Submit a Survey Work and Quality Control Plan as well as an Imagery Acquisition Plan to the Airport Surveying – GIS Program Manager via the Airports Geographic Information System website at http://airports-gis.faa.gov for review and approval. Tie the airport survey to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) using a permanent connection processed according to AC 150/5300-16. The survey data collected during the survey project will be formatted to allow the data to be digested directly into the FAA’s Airports GIS system via the FAA’s web portal in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5300-18B Table 2-1. All survey data, aerial photography, and GIS data will be provided to the Sponsor in electronic format. Task 1.4 Inventory Air Traffic Activity Description: Air traffic activity data for the airport will be assembled and organized from various sources. Relevant data on general aviation (private and corporate), air taxi, and military activity will be collected. Data will be obtained from Amador County, the FAA Regional and District Offices, CALTRANS, and Fixed Base Operators. The assembled data will include, as available: a) Historical operations, including local (touch and go) and itinerant operational splits. b) Based aircraft by type, as available. Task 1.5 Prepare Aviation Demand Forecast Description: Develop aviation demand forecasts using both simple and more complex methodologies, taking into consideration forecasts from other sources such as the FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF). Historical aviation activity statistics for the airport will be organized to evaluate airport peaking characteristics and fleet mix ratios. The methodology used in this analysis will involve a variety of techniques that will factor in national transportation statistics, local socioeconomic factors as well as the independent airport data. Correlation analysis techniques will include relatively simple graphical comparisons, as well as more complex regression analysis. Within the forecast chapter, the Consultant will provide a discussion and analysis of the methodologies which are chosen for use in this study and how they have been applied. A final refinement of activity forecasts will be conducted to integrate the effects of changing technology and will result in estimates of aviation demand for the short term (5 Years), intermediate term (10 Years), and long term (20 Years), which will be presented as follows: a) Based aircraft totals and mix. b) Annual operations by type (local, itinerant). c) Operational Mix by Type and Airport Reference Code d) Critical Design Aircraft Task 1.8 – Establish and/or Validate Airport Physical Planning Criteria Description: Identify physical facility planning criteria for use in assessing the adequacy of various airport facilities to meet demands. These criteria shall be based upon the latest FAA requirements and standards as they apply to the level of activity identified, new technology, and role of the airport. These criteria shall include dimensional standards for safety including runway length, runway separation, height restrictions, etc. In addition, these criteria shall include requirements to maintain airspace/air traffic control including approach and runway protection zones, safety areas, and other general physical area requirements such as apron, terminal/operations, access circulation and parking, hangar and services, administrative, and other
airport service and support facilities. Review current Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) and recommend changes or modifications to current ACIP to meet the requirements stated above. Task 1.9 – Update the Airport’s Recommended Development Concept Description: Based on the information developed in previous tasks as well as considering the input of Amador County, a single recommended development concept for the airport facilities will be prepared. The recommendation for the most prudent and feasible development concept will become the basis for the development of airport plans, costs, and scheduling. Task 1.10 - Prepare Capital Improvement Program Description: Prepare a recommended five-year ACIP which includes estimates of the amount of funds available from federal grant-in-aid programs to determine the net amount of capital funds required by Amador County to accomplish each proposed stage of improvements for the airport. Task 1.11 – Draft Narrative Report Description: A Narrative Report will be prepared in conformance with and meet the standards of FAA Advisory (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans. Information prepared in the preceding tasks will be incorporated into the narrative report. A draft copy of the report will be provided for the County’s review. Up to five (5) printed copies and one (1) PDF copy of the draft narrative report will be provided for this preliminary review. Task 1.12 – Coordination Meetings Description: Up to three (3) coordination meetings are budgeted for the project. One of these meetings may be held remotely using “WebEx”. The meetings can be used for coordination with, or presentations to, Amador County, Airport users, and/or FAA or other agencies as necessary. One meeting is anticipated to review the Draft Narrative Report. Task 1.13 – Final Narrative Report Description: Review comments received from the County will be incorporated into a final Narrative Report. Up to five (5) printed copies of the final Narrative Report will be provided. In addition, five (5) CD/DVD’s containing a PDF copy of the final Narrative Report will also be provided. ELEMENT 2.0 - AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN DRAWING SET The purpose of this study element is to update the set of Airport Plans for the Amador County Airport. All plans will be prepared in a format which complies with the content contained within FAA’s current guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout plan as defined by the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (October 1, 2013), and which is readily acceptable to the FAA and can be utilized by the County staff in carrying out implementation. All plans will be produced utilizing AutoCAD software. The AutoCAD drawings, in a version acceptable to the Sponsor, will be a deliverable item to the County at the completion of this project. The Airport Plans will be included as an appendix in the Narrative Report document. A narrative will also be included in the appendix to better describe the intended functions of the proposed development items. Task 2.1 – Airport Layout Drawing and Data Sheet Description: Following the Recommended Airport Master Plan Concept developed under the preceding element, and FAA AC 150/5070.6A, "Airport Master Plan", an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for the airport will be prepared utilizing AutoCAD Software. The ALP will reflect updated physical features, location of
airfield facilities (runways, taxiways, navaids), and existing landside development. Development of recommended landside and airfield facilities, including runways and taxiways; property and runway protection zone boundaries; and revenue support areas will also be shown. Guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout plan as defined by the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (October 1, 2013) will be followed. Task 2.2 – Terminal Area Drawings Description: Update the Terminal Area Drawings reflecting recommended development on the landside development areas as resulting from the recommendations of this study. Task 2.3 - Part 77 Airspace Drawing(s) Description: Update the existing and ultimate Airport Airspace Drawing(s) in conformance with 14 CFR Part 77. The set will include an identification of obstructions and an obstruction data table. Obstruction information will be obtained from existing approach plans, obstruction surveys, new aerial surveys, and the current Airport Obstruction (OC) chart (as available). U.S.G.S. base maps will be superimposed on the airspace drawing. A plan for the disposition of the obstructions, as identified, will also be included as part of the obstruction data table. Task 2.4 - Inner Approach Surface Drawing(s) Description: Update the existing inner portion of the approach surface drawing in accordance with Appendix F of FAA AC 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans. Obstruction information will be obtained from existing approach plans, obstruction surveys, new aerial surveys, and the current Airport Obstruction (OC) chart (as available). Task 2.5 – On-Airport Land Use Drawing Description: A land use plan for the area within the boundaries of the airport will be prepared, based on the identified overall development concept. This will include airfield development areas, general aviation areas, ground access and vehicular circulation system service areas, and distinctions between aeronautical and non-aeronautical uses. Task 2.6 – Departure Surface Drawings Description: Prepare new departure surface drawings in accordance with FAA AC 150/5070- 6B, Airport Master Plans. Obstruction information will be obtained from existing approach plans, obstruction surveys, new aerial surveys, and the current Airport Obstruction (OC) chart (as available). Task 2.7 – Airport Property Map – Exhibit A Description: Update the Exhibit A - Airport Property Map, including the appropriate graphics and information to indicate the type of acquisition (i.e., federal funds, surplus property, local funds only, etc.) of various land areas within the airport's boundaries. The primary intent of the drawing is to identify and/or delineate all designated airport property owned or to be acquired by the airport owner. The drawing will provide an inventory all of the parcels which currently make up the airport, or are proposed for acquisition by the airport. The drawing will inventory all of the parcels, which currently make up the airport, or are proposed for acquisition by the airport sponsor. Details will be limited to the depiction of existing and future facilities (i.e., runways, taxiways, runway protection zones, and terminal facilities) which would indicate aeronautical need for airport property. This work effort will utilize information obtained from the current "Exhibit A - Property Map" as well as other sources. The Property Map will be updated in conformance with the guidelines outlined in FAA Airports ARP SOP 3.00 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for FAA Review of Exhibit ‘A’ Airport Property Inventory Maps (October 1, 2013). The Consultant will verify all
existing airport property and easements, as well as boundary surveys, and the County will provide assistance if needed. Task 2.8 - Preparation of Draft ALP Drawing Set Description: Preparation of up to twelve (12) copies of the full drawing sets for submission to the County, and subsequent comprehensive agency review by FAA and CALTRANS. Drawings will be a minimum size of 24” x 36”. The County will provide up to ten (10) unsigned copies of the full ALP drawing set for review. The County will also provide one (1) full set of drawings to CALTRANS for review. Task 2.9 - Preparation of Final ALP Drawing Set Description: Revise the Draft Airport Layout Plan Drawings prepared in Task 2.8 to reflect comments received from the SFO-ADO and CALTRANS review. Upon approval from the County, provide up to eight (8) copies of the revised ALP Drawing Set to the County for their signature. The County will forward the signed drawings to the SFO-ADO for final approval. Assumptions: It is assumed that all previously prepared ALP Drawings and associated data, including Computer Added Design/Drafting (CADD) files, will be provided to the Consultant by the County. It is also assumed that the Project will NOT include the following:
Development and evaluation of range of alternatives for airport development. Preparation of environmental documentation to meet California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements.
ALP UPDATE AND NARRATIVE REPORT AMADOR COUNTY AIRPORT
ADMIN GRANT STAFF ASST ADM PLAN PLAN
TASK
MAN PLAN
PROJ ENG
DEPT MAN
DIRECT COSTS
SERVICES BY OTHERS
TOTALS
PHASE I - ADMINISTRATIVE Project Management Grant applications and reimbursements Meetings/coordination
4 4
56
12
6
16
16
12
4
20 20 2
32 8 40
2 4
16
2 4 2 4 8 8
16 4
PHASE II - AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NARRATIVE REPORT) Airport Inventory Environmental Features Evaluation Airport Obstruction Evaluation Airport Pavement Evaluation and Analysis (PCN Calculations) Key Issues Facility Requirements Financial Plan Draft/Final ALP Narrative Report
8
16
4 44 8 20
2
16 4
100 24
16
16 4
2 2
10
PHASE III - UPDATE TO ALP DRAWING SET Draft ALP Drawing Set Final ALP Drawing Set
4
2
DIRECT EXPENSES Travel Expenses
$
238
$
SERVICE BY OTHERS AGIS/Obstruction Survey - Towill 18
16
110
352
58
Amador Co. Airport ALP Update Fee Estimate 101717.xlsm
54
16
$238
$75,053.00 $75,053
$19,412 $9,868 $2,136 $7,408 $35,720 $8,104 $3,472 $4,526 $2,920 $1,926 $7,006 $2,740 $5,026 $19,566 $14,946 $4,620 $238 238 $75,053 $75,053 $149,989
TOTAL HOURS PER TASK
74 20 56 70 32 42 18 12 64 20 48 130 38
474
PLANNING SERVICES COST SCHEDULE "B"
PROJECT NAME:
ALP Update and Narrative Report
DATE:
October 17, 2017
PROJ DESCRIPTION:
The Consultant shall provide planning services, to include ALP Update and Narrative Report, Obstruction Survey and PCN Pavement Calculations
A/E:
C & S ENGINEERS, INC.
PROJECT NO:
TBD
County of Amador
C&S CONTACT:
Jessica Bryan
CLIENT: CLIENT MANAGER: I. DIRECT SALARY COSTS:
RATE OF PAY TITLE
($/HR)
@
HOURS
COST
A.
DEPARTMENT MANAGER
$260.00
X
16
=
$4,160
B.
PROJECT ENGINEER
$150.00
X
54
=
$8,100
C.
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
$78.00
X
18
=
$1,404
D.
GRANTS ADMINISTRATOR
$114.00
X
16
=
$1,824
E.
MANAGING PLANNER
$186.00
X
58
=
$10,788
F.
PLANNER
$108.50
X
352
=
$38,192
G.
STAFF PLANNER
$93.00
X
110
=
$10,230
TOTAL PLANNING SERVICES:
$74,698
II. ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES: A.
TRAVEL, RENTAL CAR:
B.
TRAVEL, BY AIR:
C.
TRAVEL, PER DIEM:
D.
TRAVEL, MILEAGE:
E.
TRAVEL, HOTEL:
F.
MISCELLANEOUS:
0
DAYS @
2 RENTAL RATE @
0
TRIPS @
2
2
DAYS @
1
2 ROUND TRIPS @ 0
TRIPS @
$100.000
=
$0.00
PERSONS @
$500.00
=
$0.00
PERSONS @
$50.00
=
$100.00
MILES/RATE @
$0.550
=
$137.50
2 ROOM RATE @
$135.000
=
$0.00
=
$0.00
125
TOTAL ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES:
$238
III. SUBCONSULTANTS A.
AGIS/OBSTRUCTION SURVEY - TOWILL
$
75,053
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS:
IV. TOTALS:
TOTAL PLANNING SERVICES AND FAA ELIGIBLE
B-1
$
75,053
$149,989
AGIS AND AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN FOR AMADOR COUNTY AIRPORT
OBJECTIVE Towill understands that C&S is requesting survey data to support updating the currently approved Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Package, and provide a narrative report (Narrative Report) supporting the proposed changes and/or revisions to the ALP at Amador County airport runway 1/19. Towill will work closely with C&C, the Airport authority, and the FAA to provide and upload applicable AGIS data in general conformance with FAA standards as defined in FAA AC 150/5300‐16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys: Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey, FAA AC 150/5300‐17C, Standards for Using Remote Sensing Technologies in Airport Surveys, and FAA AC 150/5300‐18B, General Guidance and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards. This survey will be completed for an Airport Layout Plan indicated in FAA circular AC 150/5300‐18B Table 2‐1
Towill will provide all required deliverables identified in FAA circular AC 150/5300‐18B Table 2‐1
C&S will provide overall contract management and primary coordination as it relates to master planning inputs needed to satisfy the deliverables
C&S will provide outside agency coordination, and ALP drawing set updates
Towill will provide ground survey activities, orthophotography, base planimetric mapping and feature classifications, digital terrain modeling, and airspace obstruction data related to the AGIS vertically guided airspace surfaces (150/5300‐18B), part77 type C runway, and Runway End Siting Surface (RESS) type 4.
COMPENSATION The Method of Payment to CONSULTANT shall be on a total fixed cost of $75,053 to be invoiced monthly based on the percentage completed.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS & COORDINATION Towill team anticipates that additional site safety and coordination training may take place prior to the start of field activities. The field crew will use clearly identified company vehicles equipped with two‐way radios. Both teams will require coordination with the airport authority for project status reports, obtaining requested data, security badging and escorting ground survey crews, the review and approval of the draft and final submittals of work products, and coordination with outside agencies including FAA, as described in subsequent sections of this document.
DELIVERABLES The C& S Team will be responsible for the generation of the updated ALP drawing set. Towill will deliver all supporting products in the proper formats including stereo imagery, orthophotography, base planimetric and topographic mapping, and airspace obstruction identification data. Table 1 provides a breakdown of the required deliverables defined in the Advisory Circulars and the scope of this project.
DELIVERABLE
TRIGGER
TEAM
DESCRIPTION
Statement of Work
Work to be performed
C&S Engineers, Inc.
Plans. Deliver to FAA GIS via portal
Survey Quality Plan
Official Notice to Proceed
Towill, Inc.
Plans. Defines survey operations and quality control practices. Delivered to FAA via GIS portal
Image Acquisition Plan
Official Notice to Proceed
Towill, Inc.
Plans. Defines technical approach for stereo‐aerial photography acquisition. Delivered to FAA via GIS portal
Aerial Photography
Aerial Triangulation Completion
Towill, Inc.
Post flight. NGS delivery on external disk(s): Digital stereo imagery, imagery control points, Geo‐referencing, flight report
Airport obstructions and mapping digital files
Field survey and photogrammetric tasks completion
Towill, Inc.
Post obstructions. Delivery to C&S Engineers. Obstructions in XYZ and shapefile formats, planimetric details in AutoCAD format, final survey report
Final survey report
Approved Towill’s digital data contents
C&S Engineers, Inc.
Delivered to FAA and airport authority. Complete digital dataset
Airport Layout Plan sheets
Approved final survey report
C&S Engineers, Inc.
Delivered to FAA and airport authority. All required ALP sheets.
TABLE 1 – DELIVERABLES & TRIGGERS
AIRSPACE SURVEY SURFACE SPECIFICATIONS Table 2 defines all surfaces identified by C&S Engineers to be included in the Airspace Survey Analysis for runway 13/31. These surfaces include: 1) All seven (7) Vertically Guided Runway Surfaces, 2) Part 77 type C non‐precision instrument runway surfaces. Image 1 shows the coverage area of all combined surfaces. TYPE
SURFACE
TEAM
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Runway Primary Surface (VGRPS)
1000 foot wide rectangular surface longitudinally centered on runway centerline.
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Primary Connection between the VGRPS and the Connection Surface(VGPCS) VGATS
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guide Protection Surface (VGPS)
A trapezoidal sloping surface beginning at the threshold and extending outward 6,000 feet
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Approach Surface (VGAS)
Surface extending 20,000 feet from end of VGPRS
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Approach
Surface aligned with VGPCS and sloping
TYPE
SURFACE Transitional Surface (VGATS)
TEAM upward towards VGHS
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Horizontal Horizontal plane 150 feet above airport Surface (VGHS) elevation for a distance of 10,000 feet
Vertically Guided
Vertically Guided Conical Surface (VGCS)
Sloping surface extending upward and outward from VGHS for a horizontal distance of 7,000 feet
Part 77
Primary Surface
500 foot wide Surface longitudinally centered on runway centerline and extending 200 feet beyond runway end
Part 77
Transitional Surface
Surface sloping from the sides of the primary and approach surfaces
Part 77
Approach Surface
Surface extending 10,000 feet from edge of primary surface
Part 77
Horizontal Surface
Horizontal plane 150 feet above airport elevation for a distance of 10,000 feet
RESS – Type 4
Field Data Collection and Inventory
Surface starts 200 feet from runway end and extends horizontally 10,000 feet at a slope of 20:1. 400 feet wide at start and 3,800 feet wide at end
TABLE 2 – AIRSPACE SURVEY SURFACES
DATUM REFERENCE All surveys and final data will be based on the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83(2011)). All elevations are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Geoidal heights are based on NGS Geoid12A model. Grid coordinates will be reported in State Plane California Zone 2 (0402). All units are in US Survey Foot. SUMMARY OF SURVEY ACTIVITIES
Geodetic Control: Necessary geodetic control stations will be defined on the airport to be used for the duration of the project. The control will be tied to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)
Aerial Photography Acquisition: Aerial Imagery is required by NGS specifications and internally to Towill for the purpose of Quality Control (QC), stereo data collection, and efficient and accurate obstruction analysis. The photogrammetry team will develop a flightplan, and coordinate the acquisition, process, data collection, and analysis.
Obstruction Analysis: Obstruction collection and analysis will be completed for the specified surfaces as defined by the FAA circulars and in table 2. This task will utilize multiple types of surveys and techniques for the observations, recording, and analysis of runway, NAVAID, control, and obstructions
Base mapping Feature Data Extraction: The accepted aerial imagery will be used by the photogrammetry team to extract base mapping features necessary to complete the ALP. A complete list of these features are found in table 4.
Digital Ortho‐Photography: Towill team with generate digital ortho‐photography at a Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) of 1‐foot, and tiled to optimize efficiency in terms of file size and coverage.
TASKS & RESPONSIBITIES The Towill Team proposes to complete this work in the following five tasks in table 3: TASK
TEAM
1. AGIS Project Setup and Management
C&S Engineers, Inc. & Towill, Inc.
2. Imagery and NGS Data Submittal
Towill, Inc.
3. Field Data Collection and Inventory
Towill, Inc.
4. Base map Feature Extraction & Ortho‐ photography
Towill, Inc.
5. Obstruction Extraction and Airspace Analysis
Towill, Inc.
6. ALP Update Drawings
C&S Engineers, Inc.
TABLE 3 – TASKS AND RESPONSIBITIES
IMAGE 1 – AMADOR COUNTY AIRPORT SURFACE COVERAGE AND FLIGHTPLAN
TASK 1: AGIS PROJECT SETUP AND MANAGEMENT
1.1 OBJECTIVES The objectives of task 1 is project setup and project management, Quality Control, project coordination and progress reporting. To accomplish this task, the Towill team will assist C&S Engineers by providing the preliminary reports to be submitted to the AGIS.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK The C&S team will develop the AGIS Statement of Work (SOW) specifically focused on the FAA scope and upload it to the AGIS website for review and approval, as is required by FAA AC 150/5300‐18B. After the FAA approves C&S SOW, the Towill Team will prepare and submit to C&S two associated work plans. C&S will in turn submit these plans to AGIS for review and approval for completing the data collection, analysis, and final data deliverables to AGIS. These plans are:
Survey and Quality Control Plan (FAA AC 150/5300‐18B)
Imagery Acquisition Plan (FAA AC 150/5300‐17C)
TASK 2: IMAGERY AND NGS DATA SUBMITTAL
2.1 OBJECTIVES The objectives of Task 2 are to process the aerial imagery acquired for use in preparing orthophotography, topographic and base planimetric mapping, and airspace obstruction analyses. The processed imagery, the ground control points, the final Aerial Triangulation results, and related reports will be submitted to NGS as per FAA AC 150/5300‐17C 2.2 SCOPE OF WORK The Towill Team will submit the imagery files and reports defined in AC 150/5300‐16A, 17B, and 18B to AGIS. An aerial photogrammetric (AP) acquisition report will be sent along with the stereo imagery to the NGS for use in imagery and obstruction verification. In coordination with C&S, the Towill Team will monitor the FAA’s review and obtain an acceptable imagery usability report. In the event the FAA determines the imagery unacceptable, the Towill Team will work with C&S and the FAA to determine the items, including the possibility of collecting new imagery, required to reach a favorable determination. The Towill Team will perform quality control on the data as it is being prepared. An internal quality assurance step will ensure that all of the data agreed upon to be provided between the C&S, the airport, and FAA described under this scope of work is compliant with FAA standards. Having incorporated revisions from the C&S of the Final data and having passed the final Quality Assurance step, the Towill Team will package and send to NGS the required deliverables including stereo imagery, Aerial Triangulation solution and reports, ground control listings and reports, and a final imagery reports as described in the approved Imagery Acquisition Plan. The deliverables will include: • • • • •
Stereo imagery on DVD sent to NGS and FAA (imagery acquired from Service Directive 6 Obtain acceptable imagery usability report from NGS Aerial Photogrammetric (AP) acquisition report (AP report uploaded to AGIS website Draft and Final AGIS data Final completion report (FAA AC 150/5300‐18B)
TASK 3: FIELD DATA COLLECTION AND INVENTORY
3.1 OBJECTIVES The objective of Task 3 is to collect ground survey information for runway critical points and NAVAIDs for the AGIS data set in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300‐18B. 3.2 SCOPE OF WORK Prior to and throughout the survey project, the Towill team will communicate with appropriate Airport officials regarding established safety, communication, airside restrictions and future airfield construction activity considerations. It is understood by the Towill team that coordination with and observation by the airport is accepted at any time. The Towill team will conduct site safety training and coordination training prior to the start of field activities and will plan on having escorts as may be required for all survey activities directly adjacent to or within the Airport Movement Area. Survey staff shall be properly badged and trained and vehicles shall be properly marked meeting the Port’s requirements. 3.2.1
GEODETIC CONTROL AND PHOTO CONTROL SURVEY
As part of the initial research for Primary and/or Secondary Airport Control Stations (PACS/SACS), Towill team will review the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) database for evidence of existing geodetic control on the airfields. If not found, Towill will create Temporary Survey Marks (TSM) in accordance with AC‐16A to provide a temporary tie to the NSRS. The Towill team will utilize established geodetic control and photo control information as required. The Towill team will densify the survey control as necessary to complete this task. 3.2.2
RUNWAY SURVEYS
The Towill team will collect runway centerline profiles in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300‐18B on each of runway 1/19 pavements utilizing GPS techniques. The profiles will be collected to deliver profile lines on the centerline at a spacing of 50‐feet between data points and 50‐foot offset profiles either side of centerline. 3.2.3
RUNWAY CRITICAL POINTS
The Towil Team will collect all runway critical points identified in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B, Table 2‐1 (for ALP), to the accuracies identified in Chapter 5 of the AC. If an existing runway endpoint monument does not already exist at each runway end a survey nail and washer shall be set. The Towill Team will determine the runway lengths from the positions of the runway endpoints and notify the Airport authorities and C&S if the lengths differ from those previously published. 3.2.4
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS (NAVAIDS)
The Towill Team will verify electronic and visual NAVAIDs associated with the Airport that is required in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B. The Towill Team will utilize airport staff for assistance in identifying specific information about the NAVAID systems prior to survey. Coordination with Airport Operations, FAA Air Traffic Control and FAA engineers will be conducted as needed to ensure the NAVAID survey does not impact NAVAID signals or flight safety. 3.3 DELIVERABLES Deliverables to include: Survey data for runway critical points and NAVAIDs as required in FAA AC 150/5300‐ 18B to support the AGIS and ALP data set
TASK 4: BASE MAP FEATURE EXTRACTION & ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY
4.1 OBJECTIVES The Towill photogrammetric team will develop base mapping planimetric feature data per the requirements in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B as follows:
Within the Airport Property Boundary, collect all existing features set forth in FAA AC 150/5300‐ 18B Chapter 5, but will be limited to only those feature shown in table 5 .that are present within the will be captured from the aerial imagery.
Collect additional limited landmark features outside the Airport Property.
Collect breaklines and masspoints within the Airport Property Boundary for the development of a DEM of sufficient accuracy and density to meet the national map accuracy standards for one‐foot contour.
Produce digital orthopohotography at one‐foot GSD to the full extent of the outer limit of the vertically guided conical surface
4.2 BASE MAPPING PLANIMETRIC & TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION Base mapping features collected correspond with the final intended output map scale and the ability of the operator to see and interpret features in the photography. Following compilation, an internal QA/QC test will be performed. As each model is completed, it will be edge‐matched to adjacent models. When all models are complete in the project, the entire set will be cartographically edited to assure compliance with all standards. Planimetric QA/QC will involve both hardcopy and softcopy reviews. Within the Airport Property Boundary, the Towill photogrammetry team will also supplement feature collection with 3D mass points and break lines in order to generate a 3D digital terrain model (DTM). Mass points and break lines will be collected in a manner and accuracy that will attain a horizontal and vertical accuracy to meet the national map accuracy standards for one‐foot contour generation. 4.3 ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY GENERATION The Towill ortho team will provide a copy of color digital ortho‐rectified imagery: 0.25 ft./pixel resolution for the Airport property (Exhibit 1) and 1.0 ft./pixel resolution for the area under the Airspace Boundary (image 1). Orthophotography will be delivered according to the State Plane grid and provided in both TIFF (.tif) and MrSID (.sid) file formats. The Towill ortho team will ortho‐rectify the digital imagery utilizing the results of the analytical aerial triangulation camera station parameters, the digital raw imagery, and the collected ground DEM.
The generated orthoimages will be visually checked for accuracy and fidelity on the workstation screen. Selected check points that are visible on the image will be visited on the screen, and the X and Y coordinates of the location of the check point will be displayed. This information will be cross referenced with the X and Y information provided by the GPS survey.
The orthorectified images will be mosaiced by the Towill ortho team, using INPHO’s OrthoVista software, with a focus on ensuring consistent rendering and seam line generation. Mosaic seamlines will then be edited by orthophoto technicians using INPHO’s OrthoVista Seamline Editor to ensure that seams will not cross through buildings, bridges, or any other structure not at ground level. Seamlines may follow features such as roads, tree lines, edges of water bodies, or edges of cleared utility rights‐of‐ way, so as to minimize the obtrusiveness of the seam and to reduce differences in tone and contrast between different images. The orthorectified images will be mosaiced so as to maximize single image tile coverage. Radiometric processing by the Towill ortho team uses INPHO’s OrthoVista Radiometrix Editor and automatic color matching and balancing for adjustment of individual images, and Adobe Photoshop for final
global adjustment finishing. Each image is reviewed against surrounding frames for radiometric consistency and image flaws, reflections, and related features that need special attention. During this process, the Towill ortho team will pay special attention to preservation of detail in shadows and highlights, and avoiding washouts.
TASK 5: OBSTRUCTION EXTRACTION AND AIRSPACE ANALYSIS
12.2 OBJECTIVES The Towill Team will utilize the triangulated stereo models generated from the acquired imagery to determine features that penetrate the RESS, Part 77, and Vertically Guided obstruction identification surfaces (identified in FAA AC 150/5300‐18B). The Towill Team will utilize a variety of survey techniques including customized inhouse tools for acquisition of features that are suspected of potentially penetrating the airspace surfaces. Direct measurement, triangulation, or ground survey may be used. The Towill Team will tie field measurements to the geodetic control established for the survey. The obstruction data points related to the vertically guided airspace surfaces (150/5300‐18B) will be processed with the RESS and Part 77 surfaces. Obstacle penetrating the vertically guided obstruction identification surfaces will be documented as part of the AGIS feature and attribute data set for submission to the FAA. Obstacle penetrating the Part 77 and the RESS surfaces will be delivered in ASCII XYZ format as well as in ESRI shapefile format.
TASK 6: ALP UPDATE DRAWINGS
6.1 OBJECTIVES The Towill Team will assist C&S Engineers by providing all planimetrics and obstructions information necessary for the ALP update. All other ALP update processes including the generation of the final sheets will be carried out by the C&S team.
TABLE 4 BASE MAPPING FEATURE LIST DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
Airfield
AircraftGateStandPoint
Point
Airfield
AircraftNonMovementArea
Line
Airfield
AirfieldLight
Point
Airfield
AirOperationsArea
Polygon
Airfield
AirportSign
Point
Airfield
Apron
Polygon
Airfield
DeicingArea
Polygon
Airfield
PassengerLoadingBridge
Polygon
Airfield
RestrictedAccessBoundary
Line
Airfield
Runway
Polygon
Airfield
Runway
String (40)
Airfield
Runway
Airfield
Runway
String (255) Enumeration (20)
Airfield
Runway
String (7)
Airfield
Runway
Real
Airfield
Runway
Airfield
Runway
Enumeration (16) Enumeration (16)
DEFINITION Geographic position of painted stand positions on the stand guidance line usually marked by a yellow crossbar according to aircraft type (e.g., for B‐747, A‐340) Taxiways and apron (ramp) areas not under the control of air traffic. Any lighting located within or near an airport boundary the provides guidance for airborne and ground maneuvering of aircraft. Air Operations Area is where security measures are enforced as specified in the airport security program. This area includes aircraft movement areas, aircraft parking areas, loading ramps, and safety areas and any adjacent areas (such as general aviation areas) not separated by adequate security systems, measures, or procedures. Signs at an airport other than surface painted signs. A defined area on an airport or heliport, paved or unpaved, intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading passengers or cargo, refueling, parking, or maintenance. An aircraft deicing facility is a facility where: (1) frost, ice, or snow is removed (deicing) from the aircraft in order to provide clean surfaces and/or (2) clean surfaces of the aircraft receive protection (anti‐icing) against the formation of frost or ice and accumulation of snow or slush for a limited period of time. A bridge for loading/unloading access to airplanes for passengers and crew. A restricted area boundary identifies areas strictly reserved for use by authorized personnel only. A rectangular area on a airport prepared for the landing and takeoff run of aircraft Designator of the runway based on the magnetic bearing and position in relation to parallel runways (e.g. 33R/15L) Description of the feature. A temporal description of the operational status of the feature. Designator of the runway based on the magnetic bearing and position in relation to parallel runways (for example, 33R/15L). Perpendicular line to the surface centerline, extending to the edge of the runway pavement on both sides of the runway, through a runway end‐ point. If less than 100 feet round up to the nearest 5 feet. If more than 100 feet round to the nearest 10 feet. A classification of airfield pavement surfaces for Airport Obstruction Charts A code indicating the composition of the related surface
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Polygon
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
Airfield
RunwayBlastPad
String (50) String (255) Enumeration (20) Real Enumeration (16) Enumeration (16) String (3)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
Line
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
String (7)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
String (7)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
String (255) Enumeration (20)
Airfield
RunwayCenterline
Boolean (1)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Point
Airfield
RunwayEnd
String (40)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
String (255)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Integer
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Airfield
RunwayEnd
String (3)
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Real
Enumeration (20) Enumeration (16)
DEFINITION A specially prepared surface placed adjacent to the ends of runways to eliminate the erosive effect of the high wind forces produced by airplanes at the beginning of their takeoff rolls. The name of the feature. Textual description of the featurE The overall length of the feature A code indicating the composition of the related surface A code indicating the composition of the related surface Specific runway end designator. Continuous line along the painted centerline of a runway connecting the middle‐points of the two outermost thresholds. Centerline is composed of many centerline points (see RunwayControlPoint). It is used to calculate grade and line‐of‐ sight criteria. Designator of the runway based on the magnetic bearing and position in relation to parallel runways (e.g. 33R/15L) The designator of the associated runway Textual description of the feature. A temporal description of the operational status of the feature. Indicates whether the centerline is derived or photodetermined The end of the runway surface suitable for landing or takeoff runs of aircraft. Runway Ends describe the approach and departure procedure characteristics of a runway threshold. The Runway End is the same as the runway threshold when the threshold is not displaced. The name of the feature. Description of the feature. The height above the reference ellipsoid, measured along the ellipsoidal outer normal through the point in question. Also called the geodetic height. The predominant status of the airfield facility surface site. Code indicating the type of precision guidance applicable. The distance from the runway end to the landing threshold. When the thresholdType is normal, displacedDist = 0 LDA: The runway length declared available and suitable for a landing airplane The designator for the runway end (i.e. 32L) TODA: The TORA plus the length of any remaining runway clearway beyond the far end of the TORA TORA: The runway length declared available and suitable for the ground run of an airplane taking off
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
Airfield
RunwayEnd
Airfield
RunwayIntersection
TYPE Enumeration (16) Polygon
Airfield
RunwayLabelReferencePoi nt
Airfield
RunwaySafetyAreaBoundar
Polygon
Airfield
Shoulder
Polygon
Airfield
TaxiwayElement
Polygon
Airfield
TaxiwayHoldingPosition
Line
Airfield
TaxiwayIntersection
Polygon
Airspace
LandmarkSegment
Line
Airspace
LandmarkSegment
String (40)
Airspace
Obstacle
Point
Airspace
Obstacle
String (50)
Airspace
Obstacle
Airspace
Obstacle
Boolean (1) Enumeration (16)
Airspace
Obstacle
Real
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Polygon
Airspace
ObstructionArea
String (40)
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Boolean (1) Enumeration (16) Real
DEFINITION An description of the landing threshold: either normal or displaced The area in which two or more runways intersect The bottom center position of the runway designation marking. The boundary of the Runway Safety Area (RSA). An area adjacent to the edge of paved runways, taxiways, or Defined paths on an airport established for the taxiing of aircraft (excluding apron taxilanes) and intended to provide a link between one part of the airport and another. A designated position at which taxiing aircraft and vehicles shall stop and hold position, unless otherwise authorized by the aerodrome control tower. A junction of two or more taxiways (Source: ICAO Annex 14, Volume 1, Aerodromes, Chapter 1, page 5). Features providing geographic orientation near the airport vicinity. The features may or may not have obstruction value. Collect geographic features of landmark value aiding in geographic orientation as individual polyline objects. The name of the feature All fixed (whether temporary or permanent) and mobile objects, or parts thereof, that are located on an area intended for the surface movement of aircraft, penetrating an Obstruction Identification Surface (OIS), or selected as representative object. Use this feature for modeling linear objects as obstacles. The name of the feature. A code indicating that the obstacle is lighted The type of markings applied to the feature. The height above the reference ellipsoid, measured along the ellipsoidal outer normal through the point in question. Also called the geodetic height. Polygon features penetrating the plane of the obstruction identification surface (OIS) or selected as representative objects. Determine the type of obstructing area by the predominant feature within the grouped area. Penetrating groups of trees, ground, buildings, urban areas, mobile cranes, and agricultural area are the most common types of obstruction areas found within the surfaces of an Airport Airspace Analysis survey. The name of the feature A code indicating that the obstacle is lighted The type of markings applied to the feature. The overall length of the obstruction.
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
DEFINITION
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Real
Airspace
ObstructionArea
Real
The overall width of the obstruction. The height above the reference ellipsoid, measured along the ellipsoidal outer normal through the point in question.
Airspace Airspace Airspace Airspace
ObstructionIdentificationSu rface ObstructionIdentificationSu rface ObstructionIdentificationSu rface ObstructionIdentificationSu rface
String (30)
A commonly used name for the zone.
String (255)
Description of the feature
Enumeration (20) Enumeration (16)
A temporal description of the operational status of the feature Defines the type of approach guidances the OIS is meant to protect. The value of the maximum profile slope of the obstruction identification surface. This value is always expressed as a percent. A derived imaginary Obstruction Identification Surface defined by the FAA. A polygon, or a set of polygons, that encompasses all property owned or controlled by the airport for aviation purposes. The boundary where land meets the edge of a large body of fresh or salt water. A control station established in the vicinity of, and usually on, an airport and tied to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS). Permanent point identifier assigned by NGS to PACS and SACS
Airspace
ObstructionIdentificationSu rface
Real
Airspace
ObstructionIdentSurface
Polygon
Cadastral
AirportBoundary
Polygon
Environmental
Shoreline
Polygon
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Point
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (6)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Enumeration (20)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Contains the allowable values of a point type used by the ControlPoint feature. The point types may be supplementally provided as subtypes of ControlPoints for ease of use and clarification.
String (50) Enumeration (20) String (255)
Any commonly used name for the control point. The type of monument as defined by the Corps of Engineers EM 1110‐1‐1002. A temporal description of the operational status of the feature. Specific runway end designator. Specific runway designator.
The monument description.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Enumeration (20)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (3)
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (7
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Date
The year of the most recent runway end survey used to compute the ARP
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Date
The date the monument was last field recovered. Format for date is YYYYMMDD (i.e., September 15, 1994 = 19940915).
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (30)
The condition and type of the marker (witness post) used to identify the location of the monument.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (255)
The field book.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
Boolean (1)
A Boolean indicating GPS suitability.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (40)
The designation stamped into the bottom of the monument.
Geodetic
AirportControlPoint
String (10)
Survey epoch used to establish the control point.
DATASET
FEATURE CLASS
TYPE
Geodetic
ElevationContour
Line
Geodetic
ImageArea
Polygon
Navigational Aids
NavigationalAidEquipment
Navigational Aids
NavigationalAidEquipment
Structures
Building
Polygon
Structures
Fence
Line
Structures
Gate
Line
Structures
Roof
Polygon
Structures
Tower
Point
Surface Transportation
Bridge
Polygon
DrivewayArea
Polygon
RailroadCenterline
Line
Surface Transportation Surface Transportation
Surface Transportation
RoadSegment
Polygon
Surface Transportation
Sidewalk
Polygon
DEFINITION Connecting points on the surface of the earth of equal vertical elevation representing some fixed elevation interval. The image foot print or coverage area. Any ground‐based visual or electronic device that provides point to point guidance information or position to aircraft in flight. The name of the feature. A three‐dimensional structure (i.e. hangars, terminals, etc.) modeled with a bounding polygon. Any fencing (chain‐link, razor wire, PVC, etc.). A gate is an opening in a fence or other type of barrier between areas. Structure on top of buildings, garages and other similar structures. A structure created, by man, to facilitate an activity at an elevated level above the ground. A structure used by vehicles that allows passage over or under an obstacle such as a river, chasm, mountain, road or railroad. An access to a residence or other vehicle parking lot or storage area. Represents the centerline of each pair of rails Represents a linear section of the physical road system designed for, or the result of, human or vehicular movement; must be continuous (no gaps) and cannot branch; no mandates are provided on how to segment the road system except that data providers adopt a consistent method. A paved or concrete pad used as a pedestrian walkway. Usually is composed of one or more SideWalkSegments
Operations Manager
task
Airport Solution Specialist
Admin Support
14
2
Field Survey Manager
Field Survey Technician
Photo Services Supervisor
Photo Services Technician
Photogrammetri Photogrammetri c Manager c Technician
Graphics Manager
Graphics Technician
Totals
Hourly Rate 1 AGIS Project Setup and Management
4
20
2 Imagery and AGIS Data Submittal Acquisition to Sub
$9,995.00
Processing
2
2
6
60
24
220
4
4
3 Field Data Collection and Inventory
2
4
4. Base map Feature Extraction & Orthophotography
2
4
5. Obstruction Extraction and Airspace Analysis
2
4
12
26
6
30
280
0
4
Airport Solution Specialist
Admin Support
Field Survey Manager
Field Survey Technician
Photo Services Supervisor
Photo Services Technician
$195
$152
$77
$152
$118
$118
$91
$152
$780
$2,128
$154
$0
$0
$0
$0
$390
$0
$154
$912
$7,080
$0
$390
$608
$0
$3,648
$25,960
$390
$608
$154
$0
$390
$608
$0
$2,340
$3,952
$462
2
50
128 2
16
268
4
60
2
30
104
4
40
2
8
60
12
150
6
54
580 + Flight
Graphics Manager
Graphics Technician
$91
$118
$77
$0
$0
$0
$0
3,062.00
$364
$608
$4,550
$0
$0
14,058.00
$0
$0
$0
$0
$236
$1,232
32,074.00
$0
$0
$0
$608
$5,460
$236
$2,310
9,766.00
$0
$0
$0
$0
$608
$3,640
$236
$616
6,098.00
$4,560
$33,040
$0
$364
$1,824
$13,650
$708
$4,158
75,053.00
6. ALP Update Drawings
0
Operations Manager
task Hourly Rate 1 AGIS Project Setup and Management
Photogrammetri Photogrammetri c Manager c Technician
Totals
2 Imagery and AGIS Data Submittal Acquisition to Sub Processing 3 Field Data Collection and Inventory 4. Base map Feature Extraction & Orthophotography 5. Obstruction Extraction and Airspace Analysis
$9,995.00
9,995.00
6. ALP Update Drawings
0.00
