CC & Industrial Production

Report 4 Downloads 41 Views
CC & Industrial Production

SF Sustainability Summer School 2009

[email protected]

Industrialization: A Process of Structural Change

Updated (USDOC) from Kuznets, 1971

[email protected]

World – Growth in Industrial Output and Trade (1913=100) + + + + +

Index of world trade

+ +

[email protected]

1

[email protected]

[email protected]

Per Capita Materials (Tons/year) Mobilization (log scale) 100

Abraum, Abfälle, Erdbewegung, etc. Baumaterialien, Inland

90 80

Overburden, wastes Constr. Materials Products Minerals, metals Fuels Biomass (domestic+ imports)

Fertigprodukte, Handel

70 60

Mineralien&Metalle, Handel

50

Mineralien&Metalle,Inland

40

Brennstoffe, Handel

30

Brennstoffe, Inland

20

Biomasse, Handel

10

Biomasse, Inland

0

Deutschland

Österreich

USA

Source: Adriaanse et al. (1997), W. Hüttler et al. (1996), Wagner & Nötstaller (1997).

[email protected]

2

Industrial Growth: Key Concepts Output Growth (old AND new products) relies on: • • • •

Economies of Scale Standardization Increasing Returns Technological Change (new materials/processes/products) leading to:

Cost Reductions [email protected]

Growth of Mass Production/Consumption 1950-1990

[email protected]

Increasing Scale (Steel Plants) →Economies of Scale

Source: Rosegger, 1996.

[email protected]

3

Standardization

“You can paint it any color, so long as it's black “ (attributed to Henry Ford) [email protected]

Improved Economics: Prices vs. Costs Ford Model T 5

log (1993$/car)

Prices y = -0.214x + 3.8738 R2 = 0.9765 4

Costs y = -0.1194x + 3.6024 R2 = 0.733 3 -2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

log (cum. production, million)

Source: Based on Abernathy&Ward, 1975 [email protected]

Costs Improve via TC (German Steel Production Process Change)

Recycled steel!

[email protected]

4

Germany – Steel Prices (Current and Constant Mark/Ton)

Impact of Puddel and Bessemer

[email protected]

Social Implications • Higher labor productivity • Rising wages • Reduced working time Mass production → mass consumption → “leisure class” (Veblen)

[email protected]

Manufacturing Labor Productivity

[email protected]

5

Growth in Real Wages Source: Phelps Brown, 1973.

[email protected]

Reductions in Working Time (hours per year) 3,000

2,700

Hours

2,400

Japan 2,100

France

1,800

UK

USA

Germany

1,500 Data: Maddison, 1991 1850

1900

1950

2000

Year

[email protected]

Changing Time Budgets (Gershuny, 1991).

[email protected]

6

Environmental Implications • Amplification of traditional impacts (output growth related) • Novel impacts (DDT, CFCs,…) • Point-source (industrial plants) impacts amplified by disperse consumption and end-of-life impacts • But moderated by increased “decoupling” (relative “dematerialization”) [email protected]

Global Materials Mobilization Billion tons per year. AD 2000

Fossil energy

Metals

Industrial raw materials

Constr. materials

Earth moved

Food & fibers

Total

Mining/ harvesting

10

>5

2.5

~16

--

>5

>40

Overburden, wastes

>20

>15?

1

>50

100

Source: Argawal (1991), Grübler (2001), Nötstaller (1998).

[email protected]

World - Production (left) and Emissions (right, /1000) of Metals 4.5 Kupfer copper Blei lead Zink zinc

Produktion Production

4.0 3.5

60

3.0 2.5

40

2.0 1.5

20

1.0 0.5

0 18

Emissionen Emissions

90 −1 50

Emissionen (Tausend Tonnen) Emissions (1000 tons)

Produktion (Millionen Tonnen) Production (Million tons)

80

0 0 19

91 −1 01

0 19

− 11

2 19

0 19

93 −1 21

0 3 19

1−

40 19 19

95 −1 41

0 19

96 −1 51

0 19

97 −1 61

0 7 19

1−

80 19 19

0 99 −1 81

Quelle: J.O. Nriagu, 1996 Source: J.O. Nriagu (1996)

[email protected]

7

Industrial CO2 Emissions vs. per capita Value Added

[email protected]

CC & Industrial Production

[email protected]

World Final Energy Use 1971-2005

Industry largest user, with largest emissions growth (but great spatial heterogeneity!)

Source: LBL, 2008.

[email protected]

8

Industry: GtCO2 (incl. electricity)

[email protected]

Industrial Emissions Reductions • Inherent incentive structure for cost minimization (=responsive to price signals, akin homo oeconomicus) • Locus for innovation and entrepreneur-ship (within sector but also across [spillovers]) • Globalized (=can/does relocate, potential emissions “leakage”) • Rel. importance (employment, GDP) declines with success (productivity growth) [email protected]

Typical Pattern of Improvement Potentials in Industry (IPCC AR4 WGII Ch7.p465)

[email protected]

9

Estimated 2030 CO2 Emission Reduction Potentials (IPCC AR4 WGII Ch7.p474)

[email protected]

Free Lunches and Take-backs • Efficiency improvements (AEEIs) • Miniaturization, light-weight • Material substitution • New demands (e-commerce) • Higher service quality, comfort and safety • Changes in consumer behavior [email protected]

[email protected]

10

[email protected]

Material Composition of Avg US Car 1800

1600

1400

1200

Weight (kg)

Other materials Fluids & lubricants

1000

Powder metal parts Zinc die castings Copper

800

Glass Plastics/composites

600

Rubber Aluminum Iron

400

Stainless Steel High Strength Steel Conventional Steel

200

0 1978

1985

Year

2001

DOE, 2001

[email protected]

US Refrigerators: Size, Costs, and Energy Efficiency

Source: US NRC, 2001 based on Goldstein & Geller, 1999.

Source: OTA, 1991.

[email protected]

11

Energy Implications of Book Retailing

Source: Kapur based on Matthews et al., 2002

Percent Change since 1970 in US Automobile CO2 Emissions and Driving Forces

[email protected]

Supporting Material

[email protected]

12

5 Industrialization Clusters: Technology Dimensions

[email protected]

5 Industrialization Clusters: Organizational/Spatial Dimensions

[email protected]

US Materials Intensity (rel. Dematerialization) (Data: Wernick, 1996)

Isolines of –3%/yr (GDP growth rate)

[email protected]

13

USA – Absolute Materials Use (cumulative) 300 &plastics &paper &fertilizer &metals wood

Million Tons

250

200

150

100

50

0 1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Source: adapted from Wernick & Ausubel (1995).

Price vs. Concentration of Materials

[email protected]

14