CTP
o
n 11 " $
o
Adopted by:
£ ¤ 17
Wilmington MPO Date:
117 £ ¤ n
210 " $
421 £ ¤
o
n
40 § ¦ ¨
Recommended by:
n
17 £ ¤
Transportation Planning Branch Transportation Planning Branch Date: Date: 140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
o
n
74 £ ¤
n 17 £ ¤ n n n nn n 117 £ ¤ nn n £ 76 ¤ n n nn nn n n n132 n
nn
87 " $
n 17 £ ¤
n
50 " $
n n
n
o
n
n
n n
n
" $
n n n n
o
o n n
133 " $
421 £ ¤
n 17 £ ¤
87 " $
n nn
211 " $
133 " $ o
nn
Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Legend Sheet 1
Sheet 2
Adoption Sheet
Highway Map
o n
Adoption Sheet
air Schools_public Interstate
Sheet 3
Sheet 4
Public Transportation and Rail Map Bicycle Map
US Route NC Route Secondary Road Local
Sheet 5
Pedestrian Map
Rivers and Streams Major Bodies of Water Wilmington MPO Boundary
Wilmington MPO North Carolina Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date: December 9, 2015
11 " $
210 " $
17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨
P "
P " "
P " "
P "
"" P "
£ ¤
P " "
74 P £ ¤ " 17 £ ¤
# *
P "
P " "
P "
P " " P
87 " $
P "
P " "
§ ¦ $ ¨ 133 " 140
74 £ ¤
17 £ ¤ P "
50 " $
P " "
P " "
P " P " "
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤
P "
17
P " " P " " P "
P "
132 " $
P " "
133 " $
421 £ ¤
P " "
17 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
133 " $
Bus Routes
Rail Corridor
Needs Improvement
Inactive
Recommended
Recommended
Fixed Guideway Existing
High Speed Rail Corridor
Recommended
Recommended
Existing
Multimodal Connector Existing Recommended
Existing
Needs Improvement
Operational Strategies
0 0.75 1.5
#
Active
#
Existing
! ( ! (
Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation
Park and Ride Lot
P "
Existing
P "
Recommended
3
4.5
q Miles
Sheet 3 of 5
Wilmington MPO
Base map date: June 1, 2015
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Refer to CTP document for more details
Plan date: December 9, 2015
Needs Improvement Recommended
Public Transportation and Rail Map
11 " $
210 " $
17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨ 17 £ ¤
50 " $
140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
£ ¤
74 £ ¤
17
87 " $
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
132 " $
133 " $
17 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
133 " $
Multi-Use Paths
On-road Existing
Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
Recommended
Recommended
Off-road Existing Needs Improvement Recommended
( ! (
Existing Grade Separation
0 0.75 1.5
3
Miles 4.5
Pedestrian Map
q Sheet 4 of 5
Proposed Grade Separation Base map date: JUNE 1, 2015 Refer to CTP document for more details
Planning Area Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date: DECEMBER 9, 2015
11 " $ 17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
210 " $
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨
50 " $
17 £ ¤
140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
£ ¤
74 £ ¤
17
87 " $
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
132 " $
133 " $
17 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
133 " $
Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Multi-Use Paths
On-road Existing
Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
Recommended
Recommended
Off-road Existing Needs Improvement Recommended
( ! (
Existing Grade Separation
0 0.75 1.5
3
Miles 4.5
Bicycle Map
q Sheet 4 of 5
Proposed Grade Separation Base map date: Refer to CTP document for more details
Planning Area Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date:
11 " $
17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
210 " $
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨
17 £ ¤
50 " $
140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
74 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
87 " $
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
132 " $
133 " $
17 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
*Cape Fear Crossing is shown as the Study Area for this project, no final alternative alignment has been chosen at the time of adoption of the CTP
Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Other Major Thoroughfares
Freeways
Existing
Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
Recommended
Recommended
Minor Thoroughfares
Expressways
Existing Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement Recommended
Boulevards Existing Needs Improvement Recommended
Recommended
! . ! . ( ! ! ( ! ( ! (
Existing Interchange
Highway Map 0 0.75 1.5
3
4.5
q Miles
Sheet 2 of 5
Proposed Interchange Interchange Needs Improvement
Base map date: JUNE 1, 2015
Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation
Refer to CTP document for more details
Wilmington MPO Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date: DECEMBER 9, 2015
Public-use Crossovers Not Allowed; U-turn Median Median Crossovers Openings for Use by Authorized Vehicles Only when Need is Justified
Connections
Minimum 2 Lanes; No Median; Minimum 4 Lanes with a Median Minimum 4 Lanes with a Median Minimum 2 Lanes with a Median Includes Facilities with Two Way Left Turn Lane
Cross-Section
Provided only at Interchanges; All Cross Streets are GradeSeparated
Not Allowed
At-Grade Intersections for most Major and Minor Cross Streets (Occasional Interchange at Major Crossing); Use of Acceleration and Deceleration Lanes
between All-Movement Crossovers is 2000 feet (posted speed limit of greater than 45 mph) or 1200 feet (posted speed limit of 45 mph or less)
Primarily At-Grade Intersections
Crossovers is 2000 feet (posted Not Applicable speed limit of greater than 45 mph) or 1200 feet (posted speed limit of 45 mph or less)
Allowed; Alternatives to AllMovement Crossovers Allowed; Minimum Spacing Encouraged; Minimum Spacing between All-Movement
Provided only at Interchanges for Major Cross Streets and At-Grade Intersections for Minor Cross Streets; Use of Acceleration and Deceleration Lanes for At-Grade Intersections
Partial Control of Access - One Driveway Connection per Parcel; Consolidate and/or Share Driveways and Limit Access to Connecting Streets or Service Roads; Restrict to Right-in/Rightout
Driveways
Partial Control of Access - One Allowed with Full Movements; Driveway Connection per Parcel; Consolidate or Share Consolidate and/or Share Connections, if possible Driveways and Limit Access to Connecting Streets or Service Roads; Restrict to Right-in/Rightout
Limited Control of Access - Not Allowed
Allowed
Allowed Limited Control of Access - Not Allowed
Not Allowed
Not Allowed
None
Traffic Signals
Limited or Partial
Limited or Partial
25mph to 55 mph
Collector or Local
Moderate to Low Mobility, High Access
Thoroughfares
Full
30 mph to 55 mph
Arterial or Collector
Moderate Mobility, Low to Moderate Access
Boulevards
Control of Access
Posted Speed Limit 55 mph or greater
45 mph to 60 mph
Arterial
AASHTO Design Classification
Interstate or Freeway
High Mobility, Low to Moderate Access
Expressways
Functional Purpose High Mobility, Low Access
Freeways
NCDOT FACILITY TYPES COMPARISON CHART
n 11 " $
o
Adopted by:
£ ¤ 17
Wilmington MPO Date:
117 £ ¤ n
210 " $
421 £ ¤
o
n
40 § ¦ ¨
Recommended by:
n
17 £ ¤
Transportation Planning Branch Transportation Planning Branch Date: Date: 140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
o
n
74 £ ¤
n 17 £ ¤ n n n nn n 117 £ ¤ nn n £ 76 ¤ n n nn nn n n n132 n
nn
87 " $
n 17 £ ¤
n
50 " $
n n
n
o
n
n
n n
n
" $
n n n n
o
o n n
133 " $
421 £ ¤
n 17 £ ¤
87 " $
n nn
211 " $
133 " $ o
nn
Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Legend Sheet 1
Sheet 2
Adoption Sheet
Highway Map
o n
Adoption Sheet
air Schools_public Interstate
Sheet 3
Sheet 4
Public Transportation and Rail Map Bicycle Map
US Route NC Route Secondary Road Local
Sheet 5
Pedestrian Map
Rivers and Streams Major Bodies of Water Wilmington MPO Boundary
Wilmington MPO North Carolina Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date: December 9, 2015
11 " $
210 " $
17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨
P "
P " "
P " "
P "
"" P "
£ ¤
P " "
74 P £ ¤ " 17 £ ¤
# *
P "
P " "
P "
P " " P
87 " $
P "
P " "
§ ¦ $ ¨ 133 " 140
74 £ ¤
17 £ ¤ P "
50 " $
P " "
P " "
P " P " "
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤
P "
17
P " " P " " P "
P "
132 " $
P " "
133 " $
421 £ ¤
P " "
17 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
133 " $
Bus Routes
Rail Corridor
Needs Improvement
Inactive
Recommended
Recommended
Fixed Guideway Existing
High Speed Rail Corridor
Recommended
Recommended
Existing
Multimodal Connector Existing Recommended
Existing
Needs Improvement
Operational Strategies
0 0.75 1.5
#
Active
#
Existing
! ( ! (
Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation
Park and Ride Lot
P "
Existing
P "
Recommended
3
4.5
q Miles
Sheet 3 of 5
Wilmington MPO
Base map date: June 1, 2015
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Refer to CTP document for more details
Plan date: December 9, 2015
Needs Improvement Recommended
Public Transportation and Rail Map
11 " $
210 " $
17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨ 17 £ ¤
50 " $
140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
£ ¤
74 £ ¤
17
87 " $
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
132 " $
133 " $
17 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
133 " $
Multi-Use Paths
On-road Existing
Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
Recommended
Recommended
Off-road Existing Needs Improvement Recommended
( ! (
Existing Grade Separation
0 0.75 1.5
3
Miles 4.5
Pedestrian Map
q Sheet 4 of 5
Proposed Grade Separation Base map date: JUNE 1, 2015 Refer to CTP document for more details
Planning Area Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date: DECEMBER 9, 2015
11 " $ 17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
210 " $
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨
50 " $
17 £ ¤
140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
£ ¤
74 £ ¤
17
87 " $
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
132 " $
133 " $
17 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
133 " $
Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Multi-Use Paths
On-road Existing
Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
Recommended
Recommended
Off-road Existing Needs Improvement Recommended
( ! (
Existing Grade Separation
0 0.75 1.5
3
Miles 4.5
Bicycle Map
q Sheet 4 of 5
Proposed Grade Separation Base map date: Refer to CTP document for more details
Planning Area Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date:
11 " $
17 £ ¤
117 £ ¤
210 " $
421 £ ¤
40 § ¦ ¨
17 £ ¤
50 " $
140 ¦ ¨ 133 § " $
74 £ ¤
74 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
87 " $
117 £ ¤ 76 £ ¤ 17 £ ¤
132 " $
133 " $
17 £ ¤
421 £ ¤
87 " $
211 " $
*Cape Fear Crossing is shown as the Study Area for this project, no final alternative alignment has been chosen at the time of adoption of the CTP
Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Other Major Thoroughfares
Freeways
Existing
Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
Recommended
Recommended
Minor Thoroughfares
Expressways
Existing Existing
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement Recommended
Boulevards Existing Needs Improvement Recommended
Recommended
! . ! . ( ! ! ( ! ( ! (
Existing Interchange
Highway Map 0 0.75 1.5
3
4.5
q Miles
Sheet 2 of 5
Proposed Interchange Interchange Needs Improvement
Base map date: JUNE 1, 2015
Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation
Refer to CTP document for more details
Wilmington MPO Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date: DECEMBER 9, 2015
Public-use Crossovers Not Allowed; U-turn Median Median Crossovers Openings for Use by Authorized Vehicles Only when Need is Justified
Connections
Minimum 2 Lanes; No Median; Minimum 4 Lanes with a Median Minimum 4 Lanes with a Median Minimum 2 Lanes with a Median Includes Facilities with Two Way Left Turn Lane
Cross-Section
Provided only at Interchanges; All Cross Streets are GradeSeparated
Not Allowed
At-Grade Intersections for most Major and Minor Cross Streets (Occasional Interchange at Major Crossing); Use of Acceleration and Deceleration Lanes
between All-Movement Crossovers is 2000 feet (posted speed limit of greater than 45 mph) or 1200 feet (posted speed limit of 45 mph or less)
Primarily At-Grade Intersections
Crossovers is 2000 feet (posted Not Applicable speed limit of greater than 45 mph) or 1200 feet (posted speed limit of 45 mph or less)
Allowed; Alternatives to AllMovement Crossovers Allowed; Minimum Spacing Encouraged; Minimum Spacing between All-Movement
Provided only at Interchanges for Major Cross Streets and At-Grade Intersections for Minor Cross Streets; Use of Acceleration and Deceleration Lanes for At-Grade Intersections
Partial Control of Access - One Driveway Connection per Parcel; Consolidate and/or Share Driveways and Limit Access to Connecting Streets or Service Roads; Restrict to Right-in/Rightout
Driveways
Partial Control of Access - One Allowed with Full Movements; Driveway Connection per Parcel; Consolidate or Share Consolidate and/or Share Connections, if possible Driveways and Limit Access to Connecting Streets or Service Roads; Restrict to Right-in/Rightout
Limited Control of Access - Not Allowed
Allowed
Allowed Limited Control of Access - Not Allowed
Not Allowed
Not Allowed
None
Traffic Signals
Limited or Partial
Limited or Partial
25mph to 55 mph
Collector or Local
Moderate to Low Mobility, High Access
Thoroughfares
Full
30 mph to 55 mph
Arterial or Collector
Moderate Mobility, Low to Moderate Access
Boulevards
Control of Access
Posted Speed Limit 55 mph or greater
45 mph to 60 mph
Arterial
AASHTO Design Classification
Interstate or Freeway
High Mobility, Low to Moderate Access
Expressways
Functional Purpose High Mobility, Low Access
Freeways
NCDOT FACILITY TYPES COMPARISON CHART
