Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Stream Restoration ... AWS

Report 2 Downloads 138 Views
Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Stream Restoration Monitoring Report EEP Project # 205 Monitoring Year – 05 2009

Submitted to:

NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

December 2009

Monitoring Firm

Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Road Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone: (919) 278-2514 Fax: (919) 783-9266 Project Contact: Adam Spiller Email: [email protected] KCI Project No: 12071067B_KP

Design Firm

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT ................................................1

2.0 

METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................3

3.0 

REFERENCES................................................................................................................3 

APPENDIX A – GENERAL FIGURES AND PLAN VIEW Figure 1. Figure 2.

Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................5 Current Condition Plan View...............................................................................6

APPENDIX B – GENERAL PROJECT TABLES Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4.

Project Restoration Components..........................................................................8 Project Activity and Reporting History ...............................................................8 Project Contacts Table .........................................................................................9 Project Attribute Table.........................................................................................10

APPENDIX C – VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table ..........................................12 Table 6. Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot.................................................12 Table 7. Planted Stem Density By Plot ..............................................................................13 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .............................................................................................14

APPENDIX D – STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA Stream Station Photos ..................................................................................................................18 Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment ........................................................24 Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events ...........................................................................24 Cross-Section Plots Longitudinal Profile Plot Pebble Count Plots

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

1.0

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT

Bushy Branch and an unnamed tributary in Raleigh, North Carolina’s Kentwood Park were identified as a restoration project in 2000. The project restored approximately 1,400 linear feet of channel, 1,070 feet on Bushy Branch and 350 feet on an unnamed tributary to Bushy Branch (UT to Bushy Branch). Construction was completed in 2002. The project goals and objectives are listed below. Goals • Stabilize the project streams. • Enhance the riparian corridor. • Improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Objectives • Installation of in-stream structures to define additional bed features. • Relocate a section of the stream in order to restore stream pattern. • Grade severely eroding banks and excavate new bankfull benches. • Install root wads to promote bank stability. • Revegetate the adjacent banks to promote the establishment of native plant communities. The restoration plan called for the removal of all existing problem vegetation along the stream banks and within the riparian buffer. The as-built survey found the original planting of native vegetation to be unsuccessful. To correct the initial failure, a remedial vegetation plan was designed and implemented in 2004. Remedial vegetation was planted at a density of 4,840 stems per acre in the streamside community and 680 stems per acre in the bottomland hardwood community. Three vegetation monitoring plots were established during the as-built survey. The fifth year of monitoring calculated an average of 1,740 planted stems/acre in the streamside community based on Plots 1 and 2 and 1,200 stems/acre in the bottomland hardwood community based on plot 3. The use of the park’s disc golf course has had an effect on the vegetation along the west side of the upper 200 feet of Bushy Branch. There are large, mature trees along this bank, but the impacts from frequent trampling have suppressed understory vegetation and led to compaction and poor cover in the near bank region. EEP implemented a supplemental planting effort earlier in the project’s history that included this area, but foot traffic remained high even with subsequent signage installed later. While the aesthetic and vegetation density of the near bank region in this area is clearly not as good as that further down the project’s extent, the large hardwood trees left in place provide a very significant stabilizing root mass. The initial condition of the banks in this area, which were somewhat steep in large part because these trees were saved had also exhibited some steepness and scour from the outset, but have not changed significantly over the monitoring period. Recently, EEP reported to KCI that they met again with the City of Raleigh and the staff responsible for its management to discuss the disc golf pressures and encroachment in some locations by park maintenance staff in order to reinforce protections moving into stewardship. In 2010 the city installed a closely spaced line of boulders and additional EEP signage on the easement boundary in this area. Microstegium (Microstegium vimineum) and kudzu (Pueraria montana) are present and are scattered over the project’s extent with a more concentrated area of kudzu near vegetation plot 3 at the lower end of the site. EEP has established a contract to control/suppress the kudzu during the spring/summer of 2010 with a follow up treatment in 2011. Aside from these invasive populations, the fifth year monitoring found the vegetation component of the project to be on track to meeting success criteria. The stream assessment completed during the fifth year of monitoring found Bushy Branch to be functioning as designed. Channel dimensions based on repeat cross-sections have not changed significantly over the monitoring period. There has been some localized bank erosion during the monitoring period, but the majority of these areas of bank erosion have not continued to degrade over the monitoring period. UT to Bushy Branch shows isolated areas of bed degradation, but exhibits stability across most of the tributary. Most of the in-stream structures are functioning across the project site, but

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

1

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

several have experienced stress evidenced by some erosion around vane arms. The structures that have been compromised are not in danger of causing wide-spread instability throughout the project. Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on the EEPs website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available upon request.

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

2

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

2.0

METHODOLOGY

The EEP 2004 Stem Counting Protocol was used to collect vegetation data from Kentwood Park this year, the fifth year of monitoring.

3.0

REFERENCES

Weakley, A. S. 2006. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas. (http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeakleyFlora_2006-Jan.pdf)

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

3

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Appendix A General Figures and Plan Views

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

4

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

DIRECTIONS TO KENTWOOD PARK SITE: From Interstate 440 take exit 2A to Western Boulevard. From Western Boulevard, turn right (south) onto Kent Street. At a traffic light at the end of Kent Street, turn right (west) onto Kaplan Drive. Kentwood Park parking will be on the left (south) side of Kaplan Drive.

I-440

Western Blvd.

Kent St.

Kaplan Dr.

Project Location

Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Kentwood Park, Wake County, EEP Project # 205 0.25

0.125

0

0.25

0.5 Miles

-

Appendix B General Project Tables

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

7

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Linear Feet

Type

Bushy Branch

N/A

R

UT to Bushy Branch

N/A

EII

P3

R = Restoration EII = Enhancement II

Approach

Segment / Reach ID

Existing Linear Feet

Table 1. Project Restoration Components Project Number and Name: 205 - Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch)

Stationing

Comment

P1/2/3

965

10+00 - 20+70

Beginning 105 feet deleted from project due to no work done, and DOT right-of-way.

338

00+00 - 03+50

Reduction in linear feet credit due to disc golf course

P1/2/3 = Combination of Priority 1, 2, and 3 P3 = Priority 3

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Project Number and Name: 205 - Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch)

Activity or Report Restoration Plan Permits Final Design - 90% Construction Stream Maintenance Plan Stream Repair and Maintenance Seeding As-Built Report Year 1 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

Data Collection Complete Apr-00

Actual Completion or Delivery Mar-02 Jun-02 2002 Feb-04 2004 Feb-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Dec-09

Jul-05 Jun-06 Nov-07 Oct-08 Nov-09

8

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Table 3. Project Contacts Table Project Number and Name: 205 - Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Arcadis G&M of North Carolina, Inc. Design Firm 2301 Rexwoods Dr., Suite 102 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Contact: Mr. William Scott Hunt, III Phone: (919) 782-5511 Fax: (919) 782-5905 Shamrock Environmental Group Construction Contractor 6106 Corporate Park Dr. Brown Summit, North Carolina 27214 Contact: Mr. Bill Wright Phone: (336) 375-1989 Fax: (336) 375-1801 EcoScience Corporation Vegetation Design Firm 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101 (2004 Vegetation and Stream Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Maintenance Plan) Contact: Mr. Jens Geratz Phone: (919) 828-3433 Fax: (919) 828-3518 Seal Brothers Supplemental Vegetation and P.O. Box 86 Structure Repair Contractor Dobson, North Carolina 27017 Contact: Mr. Brian Seal Phone: (336) 710-3560 KCI Associates of NC Monitoring Performer Landmark Center II, Suite 220 MY-01, 02, 03, 04, 05 4601 Six Forks Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Phone: (919) 278-2514 Fax: (919) 783-9266

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

9

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Table 4. Project Attribute Table Project Number and Name: 205 – Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Project County Wake County 1.4 sq. mi. (Bushy Branch) Drainage Area 0.06 sq. mi. (UT to Bushy Branch) Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate 45% Second Order (Bushy Branch) Stream Order First Order (UT to Bushy Branch) Physiographic Region Piedmont Ecoregion Northern Outer Piedmont Rosgen Classification of As-built C4/B4 Wehadkee and Bibb Soils (Bushy Branch) Dominant Soil Types Wehadkee and Bibb Soils ( UT to Bushy Branch) UT to Lake Wheeler Reference Site ID UT to Mine Creek 03020201090010 (Bushy Branch) USGS HUC for Project and Reference 03020201110010 (UT to Lake Wheeler) 03020201080020 (UT to Mine Creek) 03-04-02 (Bushy Branch) NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and Reference 03-04-02 (UT to Lake Wheeler) 03-04-02 (UT to Mine Creek) C - NSW (Bushy Branch) NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference N/A (UT to Lake Wheeler) N/A (UT to Mine Creek) Any portion of the project segment 303d listed? No Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d N/A listed segment? Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor N/A % of Project Easement Fenced 0%

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

10

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

11

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Project Number and Name: 205 - Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Vegetation Plot ID 1 2 3

Monitoring Year 05 Planted Stem Density (stems/acre) 1,880 1,600 1200

Vegetation Survival Threshold Met? Yes Yes Yes

Table 6. Stem counts for each species arranged by plot Project Number and Name: 205 – Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Plot

Species 1

2

1 1 2

6

3

Initial Totals

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Totals Totals Totals Totals Totals

Survival %

Shrubs Ilex verticillata Euonymus americana Lindera benzoin Sambucus canadensis Cornus amomum Alnus serrulata

15 4

2 1

16 6 4 7 34 14

10 3 4 3 24 11

7 4 4 1 20 7

7 3 3 0 19 7

7 1 2 0 19 7

7 1 2 0 17 5

44% 17% 50% 0% 50% 36%

23 4 2 10 13 8 18 1 8 6 4 2 3

22 5 2 11 13 4 16 1 4 4 4 2 1

20 5 2 10 14 3 21 1 3 4 3 2 3

20 5 2 10 14 3 20 1 3 4 3 2 3

20 5 2 10 13 3 20 1 3 4 3 2 2

18 5 2 10 13 3 20 1 3 4 3 1 2

78% 125% 100% 100% 100% 38% 111% 100% 38% 67% 75% 50% 67%

Trees Quercus michauxii Quercus phellos Quercus alba Fraxinus pennsylvanica Nyssa sylvatica Oxydendrum arboreum Betula nigra Cornus florida Platanus occidentalis Liriodendron tulipifera Acer negundo Ulmus americana Hamamelis virginiana

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

6

10 13 3 8 1

12 5 2

12 3 4 3 1

2

12

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Plot # 1 2 3 1 6 6 10 13

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

2 3 1 2 8 12

12

13

15 2 3 4 1

1 5 4 2 3 1 Streamside Community (Plots 1 and 2) Bottomland Hardwood Community (Plot 3) 47 40 30

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 – MY05

Density (Trees/Acre)

Total (Year 5)

Ulmus americana

American Elm

Acer negundo

Box Elder

Quercus alba

White Oak

Liriodendron tulipifera

Tulip Poplar

Quercus phellos

Willow Oak

Alnus serrulata

Tag Alder

Platanus occidentalis

Sycamore

Cornus amomum

Silky Dogwood

Sambucus canadensis

Elderberry

Cornus florida

Flowering Dogwood

Betula nigra

River Birch

Lindera benzoin

Spice Bush

Euonymus americana

Hearts-a-busting

Oxydendrum arboreum

Sourwood

Hamamelis virginiana

Witch Hazel

Nyssa sylvatica

Black Gum

Fraxinus pennsylvanica

Green Ash

Quercus michauxii

Swamp Chestnut Oak

Ilex verticillata

Winterberry

Table 7. Planted Stem Density By Plot Project Number and Name: 205 -Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Date : 7/9/09 Crew : B. Roberts, C. Carter

1,880 1,600 1,200 1,740 1,200

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1 Photo – Taken looking south from the northern corner. 7/9/09 - MY 05

Vegetation Plot 1 Supplemental Photo – Taken looking upstream toward the center of the plot from established Photo Point #3. 7/9/09 - MY 05 Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

14

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Vegetation Plot 2 Photo – Taken looking south from the northern corner. 7/9/09 - MY 05

Vegetation Plot 2 Supplemental Photo – Taken looking at center of plot from the top of the right bank across the stream from the vegetation plot. 7/9/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

15

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Vegetation Plot 3 Photo – Taken looking east from the western corner. 7/9/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

16

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Appendix D Stream Assessment Data

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

17

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Stream Station Photos

Photo Point 1 – Taken looking downstream from bridge on Kaplan Drive. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Photo Point 1, supplemental – Taken looking downstream from streambed in front of bridge on Kaplan Drive. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

18

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Photo Point 2 – Taken looking upstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Photo Point 3 – Taken looking upstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

19

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Photo Point 3 – Taken looking downstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Photo Point 4 – Taken looking upstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

20

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Photo Point 4 – Taken looking downstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Photo Point 5 – Taken looking upstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

21

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Photo Point 5 – Taken looking downstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Photo Point 6 – Taken looking upstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

22

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Photo Point 6 – Taken looking downstream. 11/5/09 - MY 05

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

23

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Table 8. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment Project Number and Name: 205 – Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Segment/Reach: Bushy Branch (1,070 ft.)

Feature Category A. Riffles

B. Pools

C. Thalweg

Metric (per As-built and reference baselines) 1. Present? 2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)? 3. Facet grade appears stable? 4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining? 5. Length appropriate? 1. Present? (e.g. no severe aggradation) 2. Sufficiently deep (Dmax pool:Mean Bkf > 1.6?) 3. Length appropriate? 1. Upstream of meander bend centering? 2. Downstream of meander centering?

(# Stable) Number Total Number / % Perform. Feature Performing Total Number feet in unstable in Stable Perform. Mean as Intended per As-built * state Condition or Total 12 12 N/A 100% 12 12 N/A 100% 12 12 N/A 100% 12 12 N/A 100% 100% 12 12 N/A 100% 12 12 N/A 100% 12 12 N/A 100% 100% 12 12 N/A 100% 6 8 N/A 75% 75% 6 8 N/A 75%

D. Meanders 1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion? 2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation? 3. Apparent Rc within spec? 4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief? E. Bed General 1.General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation) 2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down cutting or head cutting? F. Bank 1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank G. Vanes 1. Free of back or arm scour?

H. Wads / Boulders

2. Height appropriate? 3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate? 4. Free of piping or other structural failures? 1. Free of scour? 2. Footing stable?

6

8

N/A

75%

2 8 5

2 8 8

N/A N/A N/A

100% 100% 63%

N/A

N/A

0/0

100%

N/A N/A 10

N/A N/A 17

0/0 7/170 N/A

100% 92% 59%

15 15 15 0 1

17 17 17 2 2

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

88% 88% 88% 0% 50%

81%

100% 92%

81% 25%

* Total number of features per as-built estimated from as-built profile and planview sheets.

Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events Project Number and Name: 205 - Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) Date of Data Collection

Date of Occurrence

06/15/06

06/14/06

07/11/07 11/12/07 10/28/2008 6/16/2009

06/03/07 07/17/07 09/07/08 11/9/2009

Kentwood Park (Bushy Branch) EEP Project # 205

Method

Photo Number

Site visit to evaluate stage indicators after storm event Crest Gauge Crest Gauge Crest Gauge Evaluation of rain data

24

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

KCI Associates of North Carolina 2009 - MY05

Cross-Section Plots

Station 0.0 4.2 6.8 8.3 11.4 13.7 14.6 16.2 17.2 17.9 19.1 19.3 19.8 20.5 21.6 22.9 23.6 25.4 29.1 31.6 34.3 35 9 35.9 38.1

Elevation 107.21 106.99 106.55 106.14 104.43 103.51 102.93 101.91 101.52 101.19 100.87 100.85 100.83 100.95 101.13 102.01 102.43 102.57 102.96 103.94 105.16 105 44 105.44 105.53

Neuse Kentwood Park, UT to Bushy Branch XS - 1, Pool 0.06 7/6/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:

102.4 8.3 8.2 104.0 20 1.6 1.0 8.1 2.4 1.0

Neuse River Basin, Kentwood Park, UT to Bushy Branch , XS - 1, Pool 108

106 Elevation n (feet)

River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew:

Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY 00 MY-00

104

MY-01, 7/21/05 MY-02, 5/10/06

102

MY-03, 7/10/07 MY-04, 7/15/08 MY-05, 7/6/09

100 0

10

20 Station (feet)

30

40

River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 100.14 100.05 99.80 99.40 98.86 98.04 97.50 97.44 97.00 96.73 96.19 96.25 96.31 96.26 96.41 96.56 97.13 97.38 97.70 99.40 100.27 100.50

SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:

97.1 4.2 7.2 98.1 16 0.9 0.6 12.3 2.2 1.0

Neuse River Basin, Kentwood Park, UT to Bushy Branch , XS - 2, Riffle 102

100 Elevation (feet) et)

Station 0.0 2.0 4.7 5.6 6.3 8.2 10.5 11.9 14.0 14.6 14.9 15.7 16.3 16.9 18.4 19.2 20.6 22.2 23.1 25.7 27.8 31.4

Neuse Kentwood Park, UT to Bushy Branch XS - 2, Riffle 0.06 7/6/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter

Bankfull Flood Prone Area

98

MY-00 MY-01, 7/21/05 MY-02, 5/10/06

96

MY-03, 7/10/07 MY-04, 7/15/08 MY-05, 7/6/09

94 0

10

20 Station (feet)

30

40

River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 96.75 96.61 96.53 96.49 96.17 94.03 92.72 92.57 91.17 91.07 91.05 90.83 90.73 90.80 90.99 90.75 90.69 90.63 90.66 90.62 90.50 90.72 90.80 90.81 90.89 92.13 93.34 93.56 93.31 93.64 97.06 98.05

SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:

92.4 33.9 23.7 94.3 42 1.9 1.4 16.6 1.8 1.5

Neuse River Basin, Kentwood Park, Bushy Branch , XS - 2a, Riffle 100 98 Elevation (feet)

Station 0.0 0.2 3.6 5.7 7.4 11.9 15.2 17.6 20.8 21.3 22.5 22.9 23.4 25.0 25.2 26.7 28.1 29.7 30.6 31.5 32.5 33.6 35.4 39.5 39.8 41.1 43.7 45.1 48.7 52.3 58.2 63.3

Neuse Kentwood Park, Bushy Branch XS - 2a, Riffle 1.27 7/6/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter

96 Bankfull Flood Prone Area

94

MY-02, 5/10/06* MY-03, 7/10/07

92

MY-04, 7/15/08 MY-05, 7/6/09

90 0

10

20

30

40 Station (feet)

*Supplemental Cross-Section, installed MY02

50

60

70

River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 95.73 94.88 94.07 94.41 95.63 95.44 92.26 92.28 92.89 92.47 90.88 89.58 89.27 89.35 89.13 89.21 89.41 89.48 90.16 91.38 91.42 92.71 95.53 95.55 95.53 95.28 95.28 95.21

SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:

91.8 43.2 21.2 94.5 38 2.7 2.0 10.4 1.8 1.3

Neuse River Basin, Kentwood Park, Bushy Branch , XS - 3, Riffle 98 96 Elevation (feet) et)

Station 0.0 4.7 7.7 12.4 23.2 30.6 37.7 39.6 42.3 46.8 49.9 50.9 52.8 53.7 57.8 60.3 62.6 65.5 66.9 68.1 69.2 69.5 73.4 83.4 95.0 99.4 104.4 105.0

Neuse Kentwood Park, Bushy Branch XS - 3, Riffle 1.27 7/6/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter

Bankfull

94

Flood Prone Area MY-00 MY-01, 7/21/05

92

MY-02. 5/10/06 MY-03, 7/10/07

90

MY-04, 7/18/08 MY-05, 7/6/09

88 0

10

20

30

40

50 60 Station (feet)

70

80

90

100

110

River Basin: Watershed: XS ID Drainage Area (sq mi): Date: Field Crew: Elevation 92.31 92.53 91.31 89.14 87.09 86.83 87.07 86.99 87.23 87.25 87.55 88.04 88.80 89.24 89.09 90.25 90.97 90.97 92.04 93.17 93.00 93.06

SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio:

89.4 35.3 22.9 91.9 37 2.5 1.5 14.9 1.6 1.0

Neuse River Basin, Kentwood Park, Bushy Branch , XS - 4, Pool 96 94 Elevation (feet) et)

Station 0.0 5.0 8.1 9.4 10.0 13.7 16.1 17.4 19.5 20.2 21.0 22.2 27.6 30.2 31.8 32.9 35.2 38.5 43.8 48.7 54.3 57.4

Neuse Kentwood Park, Bushy Branch XS - 4, Pool 1.27 7/6/2009 B. Roberts, C. Carter

Bankfull

92

Flood Prone Area MY-00

90

MY-01, 7/21/05 MY-02, 5/10/06 MY-03, 7/10/07

88

MY-04, 7/18/08 MY-05, 7/6/09

86 0

10

20

30 Station (feet)

40

50

60

Longitudinal Profile for Bushy Branch Kentwood Park Park, Wake County EEP Project Number 205 - MY05 100

98

96 SBKF = -0.0119x + 111.42

ELEVA ATION ((ft)

94

92

90

88 SWS = -0.0088x + 102.68 86

84

82 1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

1700

1800

1900

2000

STATION (ft) MY-02, 5/10/06

MY-03, 7/10/07

MY-04, 7/18/08

MY-05, 7/7/09

Bankfull

Water Surface

In-stream Structures

BKF Slope

WS Slope

2100

Longitudinal Profile for UT to Bushy Branch Kentwood Park Park, Wake County EEP Project Number 205 - MY05 108

106

104

ELEVAT TION (ft)

102

100 SBKF= -0.0346x + 106.24 98

96

94

92

90 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

STATION (ft) MY-01, 7/21/05

MY-02, 5/10/06

MY-03, 7/10/07

MY-04, 7/18/08

MY-05, 7/7/09

In-stream Structures

Bankfull

BKF Slope

Pebble Count Plots Cross-Section 1 Pool - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay

Note:

S A N D S G R A V E L S C O B L B L D R BDRK Total

3 25 11 9 6 4 2 3 5 4 1 5 6 5 2 8 1

100

100% % Finer Than (Cumulative)

Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048

Particle Size Distribution Kentwood Park XS 1 Pool

80%

60%

40%

20%

0% 0.01

D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95

0.1

Size (mm) 0.18 0.39 2.5 13 64 150

5 6 17 4 2 3 3 11 15 10 8 4 5 1 3 10 100 Particle Size - Millimeters 3 3 Size Distribution mean 3.4 dispersion 19.7 skewness 0.08

MY01 MY02 MY03 MY04 MY05

1000

10000

Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial

0% 48% 36% 16% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Cross-Section 2 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay

Note:

S A N D S G R A V E L S C O B L B L D R BDRK Total

6 22 9 10 6 3 4 5 4 5 7 4 7 6 2

100

100% % Finer Than (Cumulative)

Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048

Particle Size Distribution Kentwood Park XS 2 Riffle

80% MY01

60%

MY02 MY03 MY04

40%

MY05

20%

0% 0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Particle Size - Millimeters

D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95

Size (mm) 0.17 0.43 2.8 16 59 110

Size Distribution mean 3.2 dispersion 18.8 skewness 0.03

Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial

0% 47% 38% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Cross-Section 2A Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay

Note:

S A N D S G R A V E L S C O B L B L D R BDRK Total

2 1 2 3 4 6 1 2 2 8 7 17 11 17 12 4 1 1

101

100% % Finer Than (Cumulative)

Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048

Particle Size Distribution Kentwood Park XS 2A Riffle

80% MY02

60%

MY03 MY04

40%

MY05

20%

0% 0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Particle Size - Millimeters

D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95

Size (mm) 3.2 20 29 45 67 98

Size Distribution mean 14.6 dispersion 5.7 skewness -0.26

Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial

0% 12% 70% 18% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Cross-Section 3 Riffle - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay

Note:

S A N D S G R A V E L S C O B L B L D R BDRK Total

4 11 7 3 10 5 7 3 7 7 3 9 7 5 8 4

100% % Finer Than (Cumulative)

Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048

Particle Size Distribution Kentwood Park XS 3 Riffle

80% MY01

60%

MY02 MY03 MY04

40%

MY05

20%

0% 0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Particle Size - Millimeters

1

101

D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95

Size (mm) 0.28 2.1 8.2 19 51 90

Size Distribution mean 3.8 dispersion 17.8 skewness -0.22

Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial

0% 35% 52% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Cross-Section 4 Pool - MY05 Particle Millimeter Count < 0.062 S/C Silt/Clay

Note:

S A N D S G R A V E L S C O B L B L D R BDRK Total

2 1 6 12 5 3 3 4 3 7 17 11 10 7 3 2

10 106

100% % Finer Than (Cumulative)

Very Fine .062 - .125 Fine .125 - .25 Medium .25 - .50 Coarse .50 - 1 Very Coarse 1-2 Very Fine 2-4 Fine 4 - 5.7 Fine 5.7 - 8 Medium 8 - 11.3 Medium 11.3 - 16 Coarse 16 - 22.6 Coarse 22.6 - 32 Very Coarse 32 - 45 Very Coarse 45 - 64 Small 64 - 90 Small 90 - 128 g Large 128 - 180 Large 180 - 256 Small 256 - 362 Small 362 - 512 Medium 512 - 1024 Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 Bedrock >2048

Particle Size Distribution Kentwood Park XS 4 Pool

80% MY01

60%

MY02 MY03 MY04

40%

MY05

20%

0% 0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Particle Size - Millimeters

D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95

Size (mm) 0.72 9.1 23 32 57 92

Size Distribution mean 6.4 dispersion 17.2 skewness -0.40

Type silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial

0% 25% 55% 11% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0%