Northeast Region: Pavement Management Implementation
PRESERVATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Meeting Portsmouth, NH
November 8-10, 2010
1
Pavement Management Implementation FY 2005 - 2011
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Northeast Region (NER) Road System Pavement Condition Comparisons Preservation Approach Projections Conclusions
3
1. Northeast Region
4
NPS •Park Units 393 •States/Territories 50+ •Population 311 M •Annual Visitation 285 M •Economic Impact $ 11.6 B •Alternate Transportation Systems 110 •Major Metropolitan areas in the Northeast Corridor
NER 78 13 73 M 54 M $ 1.5 B 24
or 20% or 26% or 24% or 19% or 13% or 22%
5
NER Transportation Assets
6
Road Network: Scenic, Historic and Unchanged
Transportation Assets
8
API /FCI Transportation Assets NER Transportation Assets by Asset Category Good
Fair
Poor
Serios
100
Roads Restore/Replace
90
Parking Road Bridge
80
Road Tunnel
API
70
Trails
60
Trail Bridge
50
Trail Tunnel Transp Bldg
40
Fuel
30
Marina Aviation
20
Consider Removal
Railroad
10 Excess 0 0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
FCI
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
9 Source: FMSS 2/10
Total Deferred Maintenance Needs including Roads, Bridges and Multi-Modal Transportation NER $2.9 B = 18% of NPS PWR
$ 2,879M IMR
MWR
$ 3,416M NER
$ 826M
NCR
$ 3,267M
SER
$ 1,654M
$ 3,220M AKR
$ 357M
Total Need: $15.6B
10
2. Road System 11
Paved Road and Equivalent Miles of Parking NER vs. NPS
12
NER Road Facts •1,204 Total Miles: •478 Paved Road Miles •397 Paved Parking Miles •329 Gravel Road Miles •88% Asphalt, 12% PCC •Parking is 45% of Pavement •186 Bridges & Tunnels •Longest Road is 105 Miles •Historic and Non-historic •Urban and Rural •High, Low and Seasonal Use •Increased Commuter Traffic •Minimal Heavy Truck Traffic
NER Paved Miles by Functional Class 478 Road Miles and 379 Parking Miles Equivalent
400
300
200
100
0
1 Principal 2 3 Special 4 Primitive 5 Admin 6 Restricted 7 Urban 8 City 9 Parking - 282 miles Connector - Purpose - - 0 miles Access - 26 - 10 miles Parkway - 0 Street - 2 397 miles 77 miles 81 miles miles miles miles
14
NER Funding •$15M FY10 Program Budget •$12M Construction Awards •Surface & Light 3R Treatments •$3M or 20% Planning, Design, Contracting and Supervision 15
3. Pavement Condition
16
• FHWA Collects Standard Condition Data for all NPS Parks
17
• Collected on Cycles • Parking Manually Rated • Four Condition Categories 18
The Surface Condition Rating (SCR) and Roughness Condition Index (RCI) are combined to define the Pavement Condition Rating (PCR):
60% SCR + 40% RCI = PCR
NER 2009 Network Condition
Excellent Condition = 95 to 100 PCR - Roads 8% or 36 Miles - Parking 7%
Good Condition = 85 to 94 PCR - Roads 42% or 193 Miles - Parking 23% (NER Goal is 85 PCR or Better)
Fair Condition = 61 to 84 PCR - Roads 29% or 135 Miles - Parking 35%
Poor Condition = 0 to 60 PCR - Roads 21% or 97 Miles - Parking 35%
20
•Figure 10 – NER Pavement Condition Rating Breakdown – Base Year 2009
NER Pavement Condition Rating – 2009
21
4. Comparisons
22
Servicewide Breakdown by Condition Category – 2009
23
2007-2009 National-NER Comparison 100% 7.14 90%
9.04
5.01
4.55 5.01
18.25
9.30 80%
30.74 70%
11.27
37.07 39.60
60%
Excellent 34.82 50%
Good Fair
40%
Poor
30%
59.70 50.78 42.06
20%
35.66
10% 0%
2007 National
2007 NER
2009 National
2009 NER
24
Construction Design (PE) to Construction (CN) Costs 40%
35%
30%
25%
20% Northeast 11.40%
15%
6 Regions 13.75
10%
5%
0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
25
Construction Supervision (CE) to Net Construction (CN) Costs
16% 14% 12% 10% 8% Northeast 6.94%
6% 4% 6 Regions 12.90%
2% 0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
26
• Project Miles as Pct. of Route Miles 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% NCRO 6.0%
NERO SERO
5.0%
MWRO 4.0%
IMRO PWRO
3.0%
AKRO
2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
27
Difference in Pavement Condition Ratings (Northeast - National) 2007
2009
Excellent
+2%
+1%
Good
+4%
+26%
Fair
+3%
-16%
Poor
-9%
-11%
28
5. Preservation Approach
29
Approach: • • • • •
RIP Data Collection HPMA Modeling 100% Field Validation ROS Prioritization (Roadway Objective Score) Program Formulation
Key Assumptions: • • • • • •
Focus on Primary Roads Stay Between the White Lines Minimize Investment in Parking Lots Demolish Non Performing Assets Minimize Design and Supervision Costs Follow Established Priorities
30
6. Projections 31
Route Miles – Pre and Post Pavement Management •Prior to 2005 - 4.7 Miles Per Year - 65 PCR in 2005 •2005 thru 2010 - 50+ Miles Per Year - 76 PCR in 2010 •Continue Approach Through 2017 with Increase in Surface Treatments to achieve minimum 85 PCR to optimum 94 PCR
32
Funding and Reauthorization Scenarios $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 Level PCR 86.63
$15 $10
Low PCR 87.68
$5 Medium PCR 91.32 $0 2005
06
07
08
09 + 10 + ARRA ARRA + L/B + L/B
11
12
13
14
15
16
2017
High PCR 91.86
33
A Comparison of 4 funding levels over a 9-year analysis period – 2011-2019 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY PLOT PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE10
PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE11
PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE12
PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE13
PCR Avg Do Nothing
100 90 80 70
Index
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Year Subset: NER_FC_12378
34
By 2013 Excellent and Good Categories will exceed 55% of the NER network (FC 12378) Low Funding + 4% Inflation All Function Classes
Low Funding + 4% Inflation FC12378 100% 9.04 90%
100%
7.80
9.30
9.04 29.90
90%
21.80
80% 42.00 15.10
39.60
33.60
Excellent
60%
Good
50%
Fair
40% 29.20
38.70
30%
19.13
14.69
12.01
18.12
42.06 16.30
Excellent 42.05
Good 41.97
40% 29.20
Poor
42.06 21.00
10%
26.81
25.22
35
11.60
0%
0% 2007
2009
2011
2013
Fair
30% 20%
21.00
39.60
Poor 33.00
10%
42.00
70%
50%
20%
9.30
80%
70% 60%
7.80
2007
2009
2011
2013
Northeast Region -- Low Funding Scenario Treatment Breakdown by Rte-Miles
250.0
Treatment Breakdown By Route Miles Miles of Treatment
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0 Preservation Light 3R Heavy 3R 4R Reconstruct
2005 11.6 9.6 1.8 1.4
2006 16.5 26.0 9.7 1.5
2007 35.0 16.2 9.2 1.2
2008 10.0 10.0 1.7 9.1
2009 15.0 35.5 2.9 1.3
2010 18.9 70.3 5.8 1.3
2011 29.7 17.0 11.3 3.6
2012 51.9 4.3 13.0 0.0
2013 31.7 25.5 10.8 0.0
2014 204.3 0.0 1.4 0.0
2015 73.9 0.0 14.0 0.0
2016 53.8 0.0 0.3 0.0
2017 208.4 0.1 0.7 0.9
36
7. Conclusions 37
Summary •Continue Pavement Management & Preservation Program •Increase Condition Data Collection Cycle •Preserve Investment Thru Increased Preservation •Focus - High Priority Roads - Where 80% of Visitors Travel •“Outside the White Lines” - Only as Necessary •Improve Highest Priority Visitor Parking •Limited Heavy 4R Construction if Funding Allows •Integrate Safety Countermeasure Priorities, Congestion Mitigation Priorities and Multi Modal Priorities
38
Questions?
39
Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Meeting Portsmouth, NH
November 8-10, 2010
1
Pavement Management Implementation FY 2005 - 2011
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Northeast Region (NER) Road System Pavement Condition Comparisons Preservation Approach Projections Conclusions
3
1. Northeast Region
4
NPS •Park Units 393 •States/Territories 50+ •Population 311 M •Annual Visitation 285 M •Economic Impact $ 11.6 B •Alternate Transportation Systems 110 •Major Metropolitan areas in the Northeast Corridor
NER 78 13 73 M 54 M $ 1.5 B 24
or 20% or 26% or 24% or 19% or 13% or 22%
5
NER Transportation Assets
6
Road Network: Scenic, Historic and Unchanged
Transportation Assets
8
API /FCI Transportation Assets NER Transportation Assets by Asset Category Good
Fair
Poor
Serios
100
Roads Restore/Replace
90
Parking Road Bridge
80
Road Tunnel
API
70
Trails
60
Trail Bridge
50
Trail Tunnel Transp Bldg
40
Fuel
30
Marina Aviation
20
Consider Removal
Railroad
10 Excess 0 0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
FCI
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
9 Source: FMSS 2/10
Total Deferred Maintenance Needs including Roads, Bridges and Multi-Modal Transportation NER $2.9 B = 18% of NPS PWR
$ 2,879M IMR
MWR
$ 3,416M NER
$ 826M
NCR
$ 3,267M
SER
$ 1,654M
$ 3,220M AKR
$ 357M
Total Need: $15.6B
10
2. Road System 11
Paved Road and Equivalent Miles of Parking NER vs. NPS
12
NER Road Facts •1,204 Total Miles: •478 Paved Road Miles •397 Paved Parking Miles •329 Gravel Road Miles •88% Asphalt, 12% PCC •Parking is 45% of Pavement •186 Bridges & Tunnels •Longest Road is 105 Miles •Historic and Non-historic •Urban and Rural •High, Low and Seasonal Use •Increased Commuter Traffic •Minimal Heavy Truck Traffic
NER Paved Miles by Functional Class 478 Road Miles and 379 Parking Miles Equivalent
400
300
200
100
0
1 Principal 2 3 Special 4 Primitive 5 Admin 6 Restricted 7 Urban 8 City 9 Parking - 282 miles Connector - Purpose - - 0 miles Access - 26 - 10 miles Parkway - 0 Street - 2 397 miles 77 miles 81 miles miles miles miles
14
NER Funding •$15M FY10 Program Budget •$12M Construction Awards •Surface & Light 3R Treatments •$3M or 20% Planning, Design, Contracting and Supervision 15
3. Pavement Condition
16
• FHWA Collects Standard Condition Data for all NPS Parks
17
• Collected on Cycles • Parking Manually Rated • Four Condition Categories 18
The Surface Condition Rating (SCR) and Roughness Condition Index (RCI) are combined to define the Pavement Condition Rating (PCR):
60% SCR + 40% RCI = PCR
NER 2009 Network Condition
Excellent Condition = 95 to 100 PCR - Roads 8% or 36 Miles - Parking 7%
Good Condition = 85 to 94 PCR - Roads 42% or 193 Miles - Parking 23% (NER Goal is 85 PCR or Better)
Fair Condition = 61 to 84 PCR - Roads 29% or 135 Miles - Parking 35%
Poor Condition = 0 to 60 PCR - Roads 21% or 97 Miles - Parking 35%
20
•Figure 10 – NER Pavement Condition Rating Breakdown – Base Year 2009
NER Pavement Condition Rating – 2009
21
4. Comparisons
22
Servicewide Breakdown by Condition Category – 2009
23
2007-2009 National-NER Comparison 100% 7.14 90%
9.04
5.01
4.55 5.01
18.25
9.30 80%
30.74 70%
11.27
37.07 39.60
60%
Excellent 34.82 50%
Good Fair
40%
Poor
30%
59.70 50.78 42.06
20%
35.66
10% 0%
2007 National
2007 NER
2009 National
2009 NER
24
Construction Design (PE) to Construction (CN) Costs 40%
35%
30%
25%
20% Northeast 11.40%
15%
6 Regions 13.75
10%
5%
0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
25
Construction Supervision (CE) to Net Construction (CN) Costs
16% 14% 12% 10% 8% Northeast 6.94%
6% 4% 6 Regions 12.90%
2% 0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
26
• Project Miles as Pct. of Route Miles 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% NCRO 6.0%
NERO SERO
5.0%
MWRO 4.0%
IMRO PWRO
3.0%
AKRO
2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
27
Difference in Pavement Condition Ratings (Northeast - National) 2007
2009
Excellent
+2%
+1%
Good
+4%
+26%
Fair
+3%
-16%
Poor
-9%
-11%
28
5. Preservation Approach
29
Approach: • • • • •
RIP Data Collection HPMA Modeling 100% Field Validation ROS Prioritization (Roadway Objective Score) Program Formulation
Key Assumptions: • • • • • •
Focus on Primary Roads Stay Between the White Lines Minimize Investment in Parking Lots Demolish Non Performing Assets Minimize Design and Supervision Costs Follow Established Priorities
30
6. Projections 31
Route Miles – Pre and Post Pavement Management •Prior to 2005 - 4.7 Miles Per Year - 65 PCR in 2005 •2005 thru 2010 - 50+ Miles Per Year - 76 PCR in 2010 •Continue Approach Through 2017 with Increase in Surface Treatments to achieve minimum 85 PCR to optimum 94 PCR
32
Funding and Reauthorization Scenarios $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 Level PCR 86.63
$15 $10
Low PCR 87.68
$5 Medium PCR 91.32 $0 2005
06
07
08
09 + 10 + ARRA ARRA + L/B + L/B
11
12
13
14
15
16
2017
High PCR 91.86
33
A Comparison of 4 funding levels over a 9-year analysis period – 2011-2019 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY PLOT PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE10
PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE11
PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE12
PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE13
PCR Avg Do Nothing
100 90 80 70
Index
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Year Subset: NER_FC_12378
34
By 2013 Excellent and Good Categories will exceed 55% of the NER network (FC 12378) Low Funding + 4% Inflation All Function Classes
Low Funding + 4% Inflation FC12378 100% 9.04 90%
100%
7.80
9.30
9.04 29.90
90%
21.80
80% 42.00 15.10
39.60
33.60
Excellent
60%
Good
50%
Fair
40% 29.20
38.70
30%
19.13
14.69
12.01
18.12
42.06 16.30
Excellent 42.05
Good 41.97
40% 29.20
Poor
42.06 21.00
10%
26.81
25.22
35
11.60
0%
0% 2007
2009
2011
2013
Fair
30% 20%
21.00
39.60
Poor 33.00
10%
42.00
70%
50%
20%
9.30
80%
70% 60%
7.80
2007
2009
2011
2013
Northeast Region -- Low Funding Scenario Treatment Breakdown by Rte-Miles
250.0
Treatment Breakdown By Route Miles Miles of Treatment
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0 Preservation Light 3R Heavy 3R 4R Reconstruct
2005 11.6 9.6 1.8 1.4
2006 16.5 26.0 9.7 1.5
2007 35.0 16.2 9.2 1.2
2008 10.0 10.0 1.7 9.1
2009 15.0 35.5 2.9 1.3
2010 18.9 70.3 5.8 1.3
2011 29.7 17.0 11.3 3.6
2012 51.9 4.3 13.0 0.0
2013 31.7 25.5 10.8 0.0
2014 204.3 0.0 1.4 0.0
2015 73.9 0.0 14.0 0.0
2016 53.8 0.0 0.3 0.0
2017 208.4 0.1 0.7 0.9
36
7. Conclusions 37
Summary •Continue Pavement Management & Preservation Program •Increase Condition Data Collection Cycle •Preserve Investment Thru Increased Preservation •Focus - High Priority Roads - Where 80% of Visitors Travel •“Outside the White Lines” - Only as Necessary •Improve Highest Priority Visitor Parking •Limited Heavy 4R Construction if Funding Allows •Integrate Safety Countermeasure Priorities, Congestion Mitigation Priorities and Multi Modal Priorities
38
Questions?
39
